Ingham County Medical Care Facility
3860 Dobie Road, Okemos, MI 48864 · Government - County · 236 certified beds · (517) 381-6100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.4% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.9% | 5.4% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.3% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.0% | 3.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.9% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.9% | 19.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.2% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.6% | 5.1% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.2% | 20.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.2% | 14.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 79.8% | 79.5% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.2% | 24.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.6% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.21 | 1.84 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.16 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
62.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 134 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 55.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 60 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 62.0%CMS range 54.4–69.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 8.1–15.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 55.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 53.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 45.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 3.9–11.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.94 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 236 beds and averages 130.8 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 105 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.28 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.31 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
57 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2023-08-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review facility failed to: 1) accurately assess, monitor and prevent the development of pressure ulcers consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent avoidable pressure ulcers; and 2) implement care-planned and non-care-planned interventions for one Resident (R21) of four reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in R21 facility acquired stage 4 pressure wound(Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle) that developed infection requiring antibiotic treatment, pain, and the increased likelihood for delayed wound healing and/or worsening of wounds and overall deterioration in health status. Findings include: Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected R21 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included anemia, hypertension (high blood pressure), heart failure, heart disease, renal disease, peripheral vascular disease, facility acquired pressure ulcer stage IV,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 3029138. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report a resident-to-resident sexual abuse allegation to the State Agency for two (R1 and R2) of three reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease, dementia, anxiety, and depression. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/18/26 revealed R1 scored 14 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). According to the medical record, R1 had been deemed unable to make his own medical and business decisions. The medical record did not include an assessment that R1 had the ability to consent to sexual activity/relationships or that his Durable Power of Attorney had the authority to make sexual activity/relationship decisions for him. Review of R1's care plan revealed Resident has a female friend on his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake number 3029138. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was in place for one out of three residents (Resident #2). Findings Inlcuded:Per the facility face sheet Resident #2 (R2) was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a Brief Assessment for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 4/16/2026 revealed R2 had a BIMS score of 15 out of 15 which indicated full cognitive abilities. Review of a progress note dated 4/28/2026 revealed R2 became upset the night before when she was asked to leave another resident's (R1) room. Review of a social service progress note dated 5/19/2026 revealed R2 was met with in order to discuss R2 interfering with R1's care, to not wake R1 while sleeping, and to leave and return later if R1 was in the bathroom or receiving care. Another progress note dated 5/29/2026 revealed R2 was witnessed in R1's room inappropriately touching R1. R2 was asked to leave R1's room, however, would not comply. In an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to: (1) provide palatable food products, and (2) provide consistent dietary glassware and flatware affecting 131 residents who consume food, resulting in the increased likelihood for resident decreased food acceptance, nutritional decline, and undignified dining.Findings include:During an observation, interview and record review on 12/09/2025 at 12:10 PM several residents were sitting in Main Dining Room and staff were present appearing to be getting ready to serve lunch. Review of the posted menu located behind the silverware at the serving window reflected tomato Florentine soup, Korean BBQ chicken, moist fluffy rice, curried cauliflower, [NAME] gelatin, margarin, and 2% milk was on the menu for lunch. Continued observation with limited silverware noted in holder and several plastic silverware observed in room trays in carts located by the kitchenette. During an interview, Certified Nurse Aid DD reported staff must use plastic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility to effectively clean and maintain food service equipment affecting 131 residents who consume food, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination and bacterial harborage.Findings include:On 12/09/2025 at 10:25 A.M., An initial tour of the food service was conducted with Dining Service Director F. The following items were noted: One 12-inch-wide by 12-inch-long return-air-exhaust ventilation grill was observed heavily soiled with accumulated and encrusted dust/dirt deposits, adjacent to the mechanical dish machine. The 2022 FDA Model Food Code section 6-501.14 states: (A) Intake and exhaust air ducts shall be cleaned and filters changed so they are not a source of contamination by dust, dirt, and other materials. (B) If vented to the outside, ventilation systems may not create a public health HAZARD or nuisance or unLAWful discharge. On 12/09/2025 at 11:10 A.M., An initial tour of the South Pantry Kitchenette was conducted with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents were treated with dignity and respect when residents were required to use plastic silverware for meals which diminished the homelike dining experience in two (Resident #33 and #73) and the potential to affect all residents that utilize utensils during meal service. Findings include:Review of the medical record reflected R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) reflected R33 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 12/09/2025 at 2:36 PM, R33 was observed in bed. R33 was dressed, however, multiple orange stains on R33's shirt were observed. R33 stated that she struggled feeding herself lunch that day. R33 explained that she utilized adaptive equipment and can feed herself when it is provided, except more recently, the facility had been utilizing plastic spoons instead of actual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-15 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for four resident (#7,#47,#72,#145) of 26 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy, resulting in inaccurate MDS assessments. Findings Include Resident #47 (R#47) Review of the medical record reflected that R47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 12/10/2025. Diagnoses of displaced fracture of upper end of the left humerus, unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction (a range of long-term effects and complications), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, heart failure and blindness in right eye. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/12/2025 revealed R47 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively intact) out of 15. Under section GG0115, Functioning Limitations in Range of Motions reveals R47 is independent for all care, used a walker for safe ambulation. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) skin assessment with an ARD/Target…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-15 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate monitoring of a resident prescribed an antipsychotic medication in one (Resident #93) out of 5 reviewed for medication review. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #93 (R93) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included nondisplaced bimalleolar fracture of right lower leg. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/23/25, reflected R93 scored 7 out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 12/10/2025 4:01 PM, R93 was observed in her room watching television. Review of R93's Physician Orders revealed an active order for Seroquel Oral Tablet 50 MG (antipsychotic medication). Review of R93's Antipsychotic medication care plan revealed an intervention dated 1/16/23 which stated, orthostatic blood pressures as ordered. Review of R93's Physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake #2649987 Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act.Findings include: Review of the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/29/25, revealed Resident 136 (R136) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged home on [DATE], with diagnoses that include congestive heart failure and chronic kidney disease. R136 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). On 12/10/2025 09:57 am, during a phone interview with R136 she reported on October second, she was on a diuretic and had to void her bladder frequently, R136 stated used the call light frequently on the midnight shift due to the medication. R136 stated the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was angry that R136 kept asking for help, R136 stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains To Intake #2649987 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for one resident (Resident #136) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include Review of the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/29/25, revealed Resident 136 (R136) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged home on [DATE], with diagnoses that include congestive heart failure and chronic kidney disease. R136 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). On 12/10/2025 09:57 am, during a phone interview with R136 she reported on October second, she was on a diuretic and had to void her bladder frequently, R136 stated used the call light frequently on the midnight shift due to the medication. R136 stated the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was angry that R136 kept asking for help, R136 stated the more she asked for the bedpan, tension and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plan for one resident R7 of 26 reviewed. Findings Included:Resident #7 (R7)Review of the medical record demonstrate that R7 was admitted to the facility 12/12/2024 with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke), dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), type 2 diabetes, hypothyroidism (low thyroid hormone), anemia (low red blood cells), depression, psychosis (mental state where you lose touch with reality), hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), hypertension, anxiety, and insomnia. Review of R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/24/2025, revealed R7 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 07 (severe cognitive impairment) out of 15. During observation and attempted interview on 12/11/2025 at 09:31 a.m. R7 was observed lying down in her bed. A half-length side rail was observed on the right side of the bed and on the left side of the bed. R7 did not respond to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 46 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide bath/showers for one Residents (#13) of three Residents reviewed.Findings Included: Resident #13 (R13): Review of the medical record demonstrated that R13 was admitted to the facility 09/26/2023 with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, schizoaffective disorder depressive, dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), atrial flutter, sleep disorder, hypertension, hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), and anxiety. Review of R13's Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/02/2025, revealed R13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 09 (severe cognitive impairment) out of 15. During observation and interview on 12/09/2025 at 01:39 p.m. R13 was observed sitting up wheelchair. R13 explained that she had not been receiving showers as frequently she wanted. She explained that she wanted to shower twice per week.Review of R13's MDS, with an ARD of 12/02/2025, section GG- Functional Abilities revealed that she was dependent for showers. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During interviews, observations and record review the facility failed to provide meaningful activities to one of one resident (R86) resulting in boredom, isolation and disengagement. Findings Include Resident #86 (R86)Review of the medical record reflected that R86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, fracture of left great toe, emphysema, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, dyspnea with repeated falls. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/07/2025 revealed R86 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 (cognitively intact) out of 15.Under section GG0115, Functional Limitation in Range of Motion reveals R86 had impairment on both sides, used a walker and wheelchair for ambulation and required substantial/maximal assistance for all care. During an observation and interview on 12/09/2025 at 1:44 PM, R86 did not have any activities, magazines, books, or coloring materials for her to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident safety during staff assisted mechanical lift transfer for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #3) reviewed for accidents, resulting in Resident #3 right lower leg laceration that required hospital transfer and sutures. Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected R3 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic osteomyelitis, heart failure, morbidly obese, diabetes, venous insufficiency, and depression. The MDS reflected R3 had a BIM (assessment tool) score of 15 which indicated her ability to make daily decisions was cognitively intact, and she required staff assist with dressing, hygiene, bathing and transfers.During an observation and interview on 12/09/2025 at 4:05 PM, R3 was sitting in wheelchair in resident room and appeared calm, pleasant and able to answer questions without difficulty. R3 reported an incident on 12/5/25, when staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement and document interventions designed to prevent further weight loss, including consistent monitoring and documentation of dietary intake, nutritional supplements, and snacks in two (Resident #10, Resident #116) out of 4 reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Resident #10 (R10) Review of the medical record revealed R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease, anxiety disorder, and insomnia. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/10/25 revealed R10 scored 00 out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool), ate a mechanically altered diet, and required setup or clean-up assistance with eating. On 12/15/25 at 9:58 AM. R10 was observed ambulating independently exiting the lounge and walking down the hallway. On 12/15/25 at 10:22 AM, R10 continued wandering the hallway while a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-15 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that bed rails were assessed and measured to prevent possible entrapment for one Resident (#7) of one resident reviewed for Residents using bed rails. Findings Included:Resident #7 (R7)Review of the medical record demonstrate that R7 was admitted to the facility 12/12/2024 with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke), dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), type 2 diabetes, hypothyroidism (low thyroid hormone), anemia (low red blood cells), depression, psychosis (mental state where you lose touch with reality), hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), hypertension, anxiety, and insomnia. Review of R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/24/2025, revealed R7 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 07 (severe cognitive impairment) out of 15. During observation and attempted interview on 12/11/2025 at 09:31 a.m. R7 was observed lying down in her bed. A half-length side rail was observed on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-15 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure monitoring and inspection of resident bed frames and mattress for one resident (#7) of one resident reviewed for bed safety. Findings Included: Resident #7 (R7):Review of the medical record demonstrate that R7 was admitted to the facility 12/12/2024 with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke), dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), type 2 diabetes, hypothyroidism (low thyroid hormone), anemia (low red blood cells), depression, psychosis (mental state where you lose touch with reality), hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood), hypertension, anxiety, and insomnia. Review of R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/24/2025, revealed R7 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 07 (severe cognitive impairment) out of 15. During observation and attempted interview on 12/11/2025 at 09:31 a.m. R7 was observed lying down in her bed. A half-length side rail was observed on the right side of the bed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2575199.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect R1's right to be free from sexual abuse by R2 and R4.Findings Include: R1:Review of the medical record reflected R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/19/25, reflected R1 scored three out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) and was independent for transfers and walking at least 150 feet.R2:Review of the medical record reflected R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia. The admission MDS, with an ARD of 6/2/25, reflected R2 scored eight out of 15 (moderate cognitive impairment) on the BIMS and was independent for transfers and walking at least 150 feet.R4:Review of the medical record reflected R4 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Findings include: An observation of the main kitchen reach in cooler on 10/08/24 at 08:36 AM with Dining Services Manager (DSM) P revealed the following: - a container of chicken with a use by date of 10/4/24 - two containers of pureed vegetables with a use by date of 10/4/24 - a container of blue cheese dressing with a use by date of 10/7/24 - a container of pureed pasta with a use by date of 10/3/24 - an unlabeled/undated container of food. DSM P removed the expired/undated food items from the cooler and reported they believed the unlabeled container was pumpkin pie filling. On 10/08/24 at 08:50 AM, upon entrance into the rehab kitchen, a cloth hamper was observed overflowing with soiled rags and aprons. There were numerous fruit flies flying above the hamper. DSM P agreed there were fruit flies and reported the hamper should have been emptied the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure witnesses observed the signing of a Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) document by one (Resident #78) of one reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #78 (R78) admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included encephalopathy and left side hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (stroke). R78's DNR form reflected the resident signed the form on 3/1/24, the Physician signed the form on 3/5/24, and two witnesses signed the form on 3/6/24. The Attestation of Witnesses section of the DNR document reflected, The individual who has executed this order appears to be of sound mind, and under no duress, fraud, or undue influence . In an interview on 10/09/24 at 12:40 PM, Social Services Supervisor (SS) K reported two witnesses had to sign the DNR document, indicating the person signing on behalf of the resident was of sound mind at the time of signing. SS K reported they would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement appropriate preventive measures and take corrective action for allegations of abuse for 3 of 3 residents (R#'s 9, 113 and 33) reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Resident #33 Review of the clinical record including the Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] reflected Resident # 33 (R33) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with fractured fibula. R33 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). On 10/08/24 01:56 PM during a bedside interview with R33 it was reported that things at the facility were going well with the exclusion of being molested by another resident (Resident #113) during bingo last week. Resident #33 stated while assisting R113 with the bingo cards, R113 allegedly touched R33's upper thigh, left breast and calf . R33 stated the incident was reported and investigated by management. When queried what was done to ensure the incident didn't happen again, R33 reported R113 now…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00146701 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet transfer/discharge documentation requirements for 2 of 2 reviewed (R#19 & R#39) from a total of 24 sampled residents, resulting in the potential for these residents and/or their representatives not obtaining their due rights. Findings include: Resident 39 (R39) Review of the medical record reflected R39 was an initial admission to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses of Respiratory Failure, Pneumonia, Kidney Failure, Heart Failure, Diabetes Mellitus, Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive, Pulmonary Disease and schizophrenia. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/21/2024, revealed R39 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 (cognitively intact) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R39 requires maximum assistance to dependent with personal care. Record review revealed R39…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00146701 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a written copy to two of two residents (R #19 and R#39) reviewed for bed hold notification in a language that was understandable, resulting in potential for lack of understanding and knowledge for and what the bed hold policy entailed. Findings include: Resident 39 (R39) Review of the medical record reflected R39 was an initial admission to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses of Respiratory Failure, Pneumonia, Kidney Failure, Heart Failure, Diabetes Mellitus, Heart Failure, Chronic Obstructive, Pulmonary Disease and schizophrenia. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/21/2024, revealed R39 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 (cognitively intact) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R39 requires maximum assistance to dependent with personal care. Record review revealed R39…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00146701. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to permit timely readmission from the hospital for one (Resident #19) of two reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #19 (R19) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, diabetes and heart failure. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/9/24, reflected R19 scored eight out of 15 (moderate cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). R19's medical record reflected they transferred to the hospital on 8/21/24 due to being unresponsive. A Hospital Progress Note for 8/26/24 reflected R19 was stable to discharge, pending placement. A Hospital Progress Note for 8/28/24 reflected R19 was medically stable for discharge. A Case Manager was assisting with placement, as prior placement was declined due to payment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Level II determination was completed for two residents (Resident #83 and Resident #104) of two reviewed. Findings include: Resident #83 (R83) Review of the medical record revealed R83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder, vascular dementia with anxiety, dementia with psychotic disturbance, and anxiety disorder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/4/24 revealed R83 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). Review of the Physician's Orders revealed R83 had been prescribed Zyprexa (an antipsychotic medication) and Remeron (antidepressant medication) since admission to the facility. Review of the Change in Condition Preadmission Screening (PAS)/Annual Resident Review (ARR) Level I Screening completed on 3/14/24 revealed R83 was marked yes for questions 1-4 in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement care planned interventions to promote the healing of wounds for one (Resident #78) of 24 reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #78 (R78) admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included encephalopathy and left side hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (stroke). The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/20/24, reflected R78 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). The same MDS reflected R78 was coded for one stage four pressure ulcer and one unstageable pressure, both present on admission/entry or reentry. R78's Care Plan reflected they were dependent on two staff for repositioning and turning in bed. An intervention for 3/5/24 reflected R78 had an alternating pressure mattress. On 10/08/24 at 9:03 AM, R78 was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a meaningful, diverse and engaging activity program for one resident (#58) of two reviewed for activities. Findings include: Review of the clinical record reflected Resident # 58 (R58) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included dementia and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 7/18/2024 and it was revealed R58 had long and short term memory impairment and severely impaired decision making skills. On 10/08/24 at 10:30, PM R58 was observed in his room sitting in his wheel chair up against the wall, a television (TV) was above him and not on. R58 sat in the room which was dark, TV not on, music not on. R58 observed in the same position after lunch again no TV, sitting in his room in wheelchair. On 10/09/24 at 01:22 PM, R 58 was observed being brought back from the dining room after lunch, staff observed leaving R58 in room sitting against wall under the TV, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drug regimens were reviewed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist and provider, in one of five residents reviewed for medication management and monitoring (Resident #3), resulting in the potential for increased adverse consequences related to medication therapy. Findings include: Resident #3 (R3) Review of the medical record reflected R3 was an initial admission to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of Anxiety, Schizophrenia, Diabetes Mellitus, Coronary Artery Disease and other orthopedic conditions. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/12/2024, revealed R3 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively intact) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R3 was independent or required minimal assistance with personal care. Record review revealed on the 04/17/24 Monthly Medication Review (MMR) pharmacy made…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to dispose of expired medications in one of four medication carts and one of three medication storage rooms reviewed, resulting in the potential for decreased efficacy of medications and adverse side effects in a current facility census of 132 residents. Findings include: During an observation on 10/09/24 at 08:50AM of Blue Cart a bottle of Thiamin Vitamin B-1 100mg with an expiration date of 03/24. During an observation on 10/09/24 at 09:00AM in the Blue Medication Room, observed a bottle of Move+Vision+Bones+Supplement expired on 04/24. During an observation on 10/09/24 at 09:10AM of the [NAME] Ridge Medication Room, two bottles of Calcium Carbonate 500mg with an expiration date of 04/24. During an interview on 10/11/24 at 09:20 AM, DON B stated nurses checked them on the night shift. DON B also stated the central supply person was supposed to have helped monitor the medication carts and the medication rooms, but she did not the carts and rooms.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer an influenza immunization per consent for one (Resident #46) of five reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #46 (R46) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia and heart failure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/9/24 revealed R46 had moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. The medical record revealed R46 had a legal guardian. Review of the Infection Note dated 10/13/24 revealed messages were left with R46's guardian to get consent for the influenza vaccine and that a letter was sent on 8/26/24 with no reply. R46 was then hospitalized from [DATE] to 10/24/24. The hospital documents revealed no immunizations were given during hospitalization. Review of the Influenza Vaccine Informed Consent/Declination revealed on 10/25/23, R46's guardian gave verbal consent for R46 to receive the influenza…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake MI00142898. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed date mark all potentially hazardous ready-to-eat food products in two resident refrigerators of three reviewed. Findings include: An observation of the rehab unit resident refrigerator on 7/9/24 at 3:56 PM revealed signage that read STOP ANY PATIENT WHO WISHES TO HAVE FOOD IN THIS REFRIGERATOR MUST HAVE THEIR NAME, ROOM NUMBER, AND DATE THAT IS PLACED IN HERE ON THE CONTAINER PLEASE MAKE SURE IT IS MARKED. Another sign included the Dining Services Department Food Storage Chart which indicated maximum storage timelines. Inside the refrigerator, the following was observed: a bowl of an unknown food that was undated 3 containers of Chobani blueberry Greek yogurt that expired 7/8/24 a squirt bottle of what appeared to be salad dressing that was not labeled or dated a bowl of peas that was undated a cup of milk that was undated a container of a roasted turkey BLT from the facility's bistro with a date of 6/30/24 a container of salad that was undated a container of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains To Intake #MI00145470 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1. ensure one resident (resident #7) of three residents reviewed were free of significant medication errors. 2. notify the physician of missed doses of physician ordered medication, resulting in the potential for increased seizure risk. Findings include: Review of the clinical record including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident 7 (R7) was admitted to the facility with diagnosis that included seizure disorder, muscular dystrophy. Resident 7 scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Review of R7's June and July 2024's monthly physician orders reflected acetazolamide 250 milligrams (mg) was ordered 3 times a day for seizure disorder. Review of R7's medication administration record for June and July 2024 reflected the acetazolamide afternoon and evening dose was not administered to R7 on June 30, 2024 and the morning dose of acetazolamide was not administered on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00139667 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to immediately report abuse allegations for 1 Resident (Resident #6) of 3 reviewed for abuse resulting in allegations of abuse that were not reported to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the State Agency timely and the potential for further allegations of abuse to go unreported and not thoroughly investigated. Findings include: Resident #6 Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 (R3) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, and complex regional pain syndrome. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R6 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). On 12/11/23 2:32 PM, R6 was observed in her room nicely groomed and seated in her chair. R6 was easily conversant. R6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes MI00140195 and MI00140198 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the protection of residents from abuse for two (Resident #7 and #8) of 7 reviewed, resulting in the potential for further abuse to occur. Findings Include: Resident #7 (R7) Review of the medical record revealed that R7 was admitted to facility [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, heart failure, and insomnia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE] reflected that R7 was sometimes understood and sometimes able to understand others with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) score of 3 (Severe Cognitive Impairment). Section G of the same MDS revealed that R7 required one-person extensive assist for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. On [DATE] at 2:43 PM, R7 was observed self-propelling wheelchair off Red River Road Hall toward South Unit Dining Room. R7 stated she was doing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance to 2 sampled resident (Resident #5 and Resident #14), resulting in assistance with ADL and/or bowel/bladder not provided, the potential for skin breakdown, resident's needs to go unmet, discomfort and frustration to a reasonable person. Findings Include: Resident #5 (R5) Review of the medical record revealed R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included major depressive disorder, unspecified benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, cognitive communication deficit and anoxic brain damage. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R5 scored 9 out of 15 (cognitively impaired) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). Review of the Care Plan revealed that R5 required (assistance) by (2) staff for toileting. On 12/14/23 at 1:16 PM, R5 was observed in his room. R6 was sitting in a specialized high back wheelchair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure cleanliness of kitchen equipment, food storage temperatures were documented, and food products were dated, resulting in the potential for food borne illness to occur in a current facility census of 171 residents. Findings Included: In an observation on 8/28/2023 at 9:14 AM, during the initial kitchen tour, revealed the juice machine had thick sticky debris on the pour spouts of the apple and cranberry juice, and the front of the juice machine observed to have sticky thick debris on it. During observation of the walk in cooler an opened bag of shredded cheese, which was not tied close, was observed to not have any date on the package of when the cheese package was opened, nor did it have a use by date on the bag. A container of stir fry sauce was observed to have an opened date of 7/10/2023 and an expiration date of 8/9/2023, a container of teriyaki sauce had an opened date of 7/3/2023 and an expiration date of 8/2/2023, and a container of barbeque sauce had a use by date of 8/16/2023. Observation inside…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During an observation on 8/29/2023 at 8:20 AM, the call light for room [ROOM NUMBER], that was visible outside of the room door, was on. At 8:25 AM, five staff members were observed to walk past room and did not stop to address the resident's need. On 8/29/2023 at 8:44 AM, the call light was on for room [ROOM NUMBER] two staff members walked past and did not address the call light or resident needs, and at 8:48 AM, two other staff members walked by and did not address the call light or the resident's needs. At 8:49 AM, four other staff members were observed to walk by room [ROOM NUMBER] and did not stop and address the call light or the resident's needs. In an observation on 8/30/2023 at 9:44 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER]'s call light was on. Two staff members walked by room [ROOM NUMBER] and did not address the call light or the resident's needs. A nurse was observed standing at the medication cart in the hall, but did not address the call light or resident's needs. In an observation on 8/30/2023 at 9:55 AM, a call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to assess, update, and ensure advance directive information was in place for 1 resident (Resident 109) of two residents reviewed, resulting in the potential for resident's preferences for medical care to not be followed by the facility staff. Findings Include: Resident #109 (R109) A review of the medical record revealed R109 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection, type 2 diabetes, aphasia, and adult failure to thrive. R109 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS), a short performance based cognitive screen for nursing home residents, score of 10 (8-12 moderately impaired) which was completed on 8/26/2023. On 08/28/23 at 03:06 PM a record review was conducted, and code status wasn't found under physician orders, underneath R109 name, in the progress notes, under miscellaneous or the care plan. During an interview on 08/29/23 at 07:40 AM, Nursing Department Unit Secretary (NDUS) P stated that everything…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical restraints in one of one resident reviewed for physical restraints (Resident #59), resulting in the likelihood of injuries, depression, and unmet needs. Findings include: Resident #59 (R59) Review of the medical record revealed R59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension, type two diabetes, major depressive disorder, unspecified dementia, and vascular dementia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/18/23 revealed R59 scored 10 out of 15 (moderate cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The same MDS reflected that R59 required extensive assistance of one person for dressing and total dependence for transferring and toileting. In an observation on 08/28/23 at 1:57 PM, R59 was observed in a wheelchair, holding onto the wheelchair armrest, and repeatedly shaking the armrest of the wheelchair. When interviewed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for 3 (Resident #21, #34, and #309) of 32 residents reviewed resulting in the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #34 Review of the medical record revealed that Resident #34 (R34) was readmitted to facility 4/5/22 with diagnoses including left hand contracture, right hand contracture, rheumatoid arthritis, and chronic ischemic heart disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/6/2023 revealed that R34 was rarely/never understood with a staff assessment for mental status reflecting short and long-term memory problems with severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. Section G of the same MDS revealed that R34 required one-person total assist with bed mobility, dressing, and eating; two-person total assist with transfers and toilet use; and had an upper extremity functional limitation in range of motion on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to revise Care Plans for one (Resident #130) of 32 reviewed for Care Plans, resulting in the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #130 (R130): Review of the medical record reflected R130 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (excessive accumulation of fluid within the brain), major depressive disorder and insomnia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/15/23, reflected R130 scored twelve out of 15 (moderate cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). The same MDS reflected R130 extensive assistance of one person for most activities of daily living. On 08/29/23 at 1:26 PM, R130 was observed propelling herself in the hallway in the direction of her room. R130 reported that there had been sexual problems at the facility. R130 reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received assistance with care according to their personal preferences and care plans for 1 residents(R21) of 3 residents reviewed for hygiene and grooming , resulting in missed grooming, skin breakdown and the increased likelihood for inadequate hygiene and feelings of embarrassment. Findings include: Resident #21 (R21) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected R21 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included anemia, hypertension (high blood pressure), heart failure, heart disease, renal disease, peripheral vascular disease, facility acquired pressure ulcer stage 4, anxiety, and depression. The MDS reflected R21 had a BIM (assessment tool) which indicated her ability to make daily decisions was severely impaired, and she required two person physical assist with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, hygiene, bathing and one person…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide failed to provide meaningful, individualized activities for one resident (#59) of two residents reviewed for activities resulting in the potential for depression, boredom, and feelings of lack of self-worth. Findings Include: Resident #59 (R59) Review of the medical record revealed R59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension, type two diabetes, major depressive disorder, unspecified dementia, and vascular dementia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/18/23 revealed R59 scored 10 out of 15 (moderate cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). The same MDS reflected that R59 required extensive assistance of one person for dressing and total dependence for transferring and toileting. In an observation on 08/28/23 at 1:57 PM, R59 was observed in a wheelchair, holding onto the wheelchair armrest, and repeatedly shaking the armrest of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate safety measures to ensure resident safety for one resident (R309) of four residents reviewed for accidents and hazards, resulting in R309's repeat falls post surgical repair with re-fracture and increased likelihood for additional accidents and/or injuries. Findings include: Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected R309 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] post left hip fracture repair related to fall at home, with diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure), dementia, heart disease, orthostatic hypotension, urinary tract infection and depression. The MDS reflected R309 had a BIM (Brief Interview for Mental status) score of 3 which indicated her ability to make daily decisions was severely impaired, and she required one-person physical assist bed mobility, transfers, walk in room and corridor, locomotion on unit, toileting, dressing, eating,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00138710. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services to restore as much normal bowel and bladder function as possible in one of two residents reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence (Resident 149#), resulting in continued or worsened incontinence. Findings include: Resident #149 (R149) On 8/28/23 at 10:44 AM, R149 was observed sitting in her room in a wheelchair. R149's family member was interviewed at the same date and time and stated R149 was admitted to the facility for short-term rehabilitation following a stroke, and the plan was for her to return home with services. R149's family member voiced a concern that the facility had refused to work on bowel and bladder training for R149's incontinence. R149's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], introduced the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a short performance-based cognitive screener for nursing home…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform nutritional assessments and implement nutrition interventions for two (Resident #109 and Resident #146) of six reviewed, resulting in the potential for continued weight loss and a decline in nutritional status. Findings include: Resident #146 (R146) Review of the medical record revealed R146 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, cervical disc disorder, and insomnia. According to the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/3/23 revealed R146 scored 4 out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool), required extensive assistance of one person for eating, weighed 125 pounds (#), sustained a significant weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or 10% or more in the last six months and was not on a prescribed weight loss regimen. Review of Mini Nutritional assessment dated [DATE] and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure three out of six Certified Nurse Aids (CNA) have completed a yearly competency/skills check list resulting in the potential for compromised resident care and unmet needs. Findings Included: In an interview on 8/30/2023 at 10:13 AM, CNA W stated that she had been telling Director of Nursing (DON) B, and even wrote a letter that she needed to get her skills competency checklist completed. CNA W stated she also told Unit Manager X, and she had been telling them for three months that her skills check list was due at the end of the month. In an interview on 8/30/2023 at 2:18 PM, [NAME] President of Human Resources (VP/HR) D stated that the CNA skills competency checklist was to be completed yearly. VP/HR D said it must be done in person. VP/HR D stated that CNA W was registered, but must have missed the group in person training, and said that the group in-person skills/competency checklist were held maybe in May and December. VP/HR D said management sets up the group training. VP/HR D said CNA W's skills competency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor the use of an antipsychotic for one (Resident #144) and attempt non-pharmacological interventions prior to the use of a PRN (as needed) antianxiety medication for one (Resident #68) of five reviewed, resulting in the potential for adverse reactions and unnecessary medications. Findings include: Resident #68 (R68) Review of the medical record revealed R68 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, mixed receptive expressive language disorder, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/1/23 revealed R68 had moderate cognitive impairment, too antipsychotic, antianxiety, and antidepressant medications. Review of the Physician's Progress Note dated 11/1/22 revealed Restart Ativan 0.5 mg (milligrams) every 6 hours PRN indefinitely. Do not want to schedule Ativan as she does not require this every day.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5% when three medication errors were observed from a total of 34 opportunities for three residents (Resident #4, Resident #70, and Resident #103) of six residents reviewed for medication administration, resulting in a medication error rate of 8.82% and the potential for adverse reactions/side effects. Findings include: Resident #103 (R103) Review of the medical record revealed R103 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease. On 8/30/23 at 8:00 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Q was observed preparing and administering medications to R103. LPN Q administered Senna 8.6 milligrams (mg), a laxative medication. Review of the Physician's Order dated 8/15/22 revealed an order for Senna S 8.6-50 mg (sennosides-docusate sodium), a laxative and stool softener medication. On 8/30/23 at 8:11 AM, LPN Q agreed R103 was ordered to receive Senna S and Senna was administered.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer insulin according to physician orders in one of five residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #59), resulting in an increased risk of hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia. Findings include: Resident #59 (R59) R59's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 7/18/23 introduced a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a brief performance-based cognitive screener for nursing home residents, score of 10 (08-12 Moderate Impairment). The same MDS revealed R59 had the diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, non-traumatic brain dysfunction, anemia, dementia, and lung disease. In review of R59's physician order dated 4/21/23, NovoLog Solution (Insulin Aspart) 100 Units/Milliliter (ml), was to be administered per sliding scale: if 150 - 200 = 3 units. 201 - 250 = 4 units. 251 - 300 = 5 units. 301 - 350 = 7 units. 351 - 400 = 8 units. 401+ = 9 units, subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime for type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia (high blood sugar). In review of R59's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biological's stored in a medication cart were securely locked while the cart was unattended, resulting in the potential for residents to access medications. Findings Included: In an observation on the 200 hall on 8/29/2023 at 11:16 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) S was observed in the hall administering medications to a resident. The medication cart was was observed to be located by room [ROOM NUMBER], and LPN S was located by rooms 209-213. The medication cart was observed to be left unlocked while LPN S was down the hall administering medications to a resident. The time the cart was unattended was approximately 4 minutes. In an interview on 8/29/2023 at 2:19 PM, LPN S stated that the facility's policy was to lock the medication carts when the cart in not be attended to and before walking away from the cart. LPN S said did realize that she had left the cart unlocked until she returned to the cart. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00138710. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food and drink per assessment and individualized care plan, in 2 of 19 reviewed for dining (Resident #51 & #149), resulting in the potential for choking, decreased food acceptance, protein deficiency, and burns (Resident #51). Findings include: Resident #51 (R51) On 8/28/23 at 12:30 PM, R51 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the dining room at a table alone with no other residents. R51's lunch meal ticket was on the table next to her lunch and instructed to cut meats into bite sized pieces; and to serve hot liquids with a lid. R51 at the same date and time indicated she was finished, her plate was observed with a serving of chicken breast untouched, and not cut into bite-sized pieces. R51 had a coffee in a cup without a lid. There we no extra napkins on the table and her meal was not served a bowl. On 8/29/23 at 12:49 PM, R51 had just finished her lunch. R51's plate was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to meet resident individualized food preferences in one (Resident #208) of 19 residents reviewed, resulting in the potential for weight loss, decreased meal enjoyment and/or frustration. Findings Include: Resident #208 (R208) According to the facility's admission record, R208 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cirrhosis of the liver disease/excess abdominal fluid, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, lung disease), type 2 diabetes, and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). A review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 08/28/2023 reflected R208 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS), a short performance based cognitive screen for nursing home residents, score of 14 (13-15, cognitively intact). During an interview on 08/29/23 at 10:00 AM, R208 indicated she didn't get to choose what she wanted to eat. She said they bring out food without choices. R208 stated that there weren't any alternates to choose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adaptive equipment for one (Resident #146) of 19 reviewed, resulting in the potential for decreased independence with drinking. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R146 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, cervical disc disorder, and insomnia. According to the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/3/23 revealed R146 scored 4 out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) and required extensive assistance of one person for eating. On 8/28/23 at 11:43 AM, R146 was observed arriving to the dining room after staff assisted her to the bathroom. R146 was served two cups of juice in regular cups. R146 spilled half of a cup of juice on the table while trying to drink. On 8/29/23 at 8:13 AM, R146 was observed in the dining room prior to meal service. R146 was served…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene and infection control practices during lunch time meal pass, resulting in missed opportunities for hand hygiene, improper hand hygiene techniques, and the potential for the spread of infection. Findings Include: In an observation on 08/28/23 at 12:11 PM, an observation was made of a staff member grabbing a plate containing a resident's lunch and delivering the plate to the resident. The staff member returned to the kitchen and grabbed another resident's plate containing their lunch and proceeded to deliver to a different resident without performing hand hygiene in between residents. The same staff member returned to the kitchen, grabbed another plate containing food and passed to a third resident without performing hand hygiene The same staff member assisted a resident with repositioning in a wheelchair, and proceeded to continue to the kitchen area. The same staff member obtained another plate containing food and passed it to a fourth resident. The staff member opened silverware and began…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer a pneumococcal immunization timely to one (Resident #146) of five reviewed for immunizations, resulting in the potential to contract a pneumococcal infection, and/or experience serious illness or complications. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R146 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, cervical disc disorder, and insomnia. According to the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/3/23 revealed R146 scored 4 out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) Review of R146's immunization history revealed no documentation for a pneumococcal immunization history. Review of the Pneumococcal Vaccine Informed Consent/Declination revealed on 7/10/23, consent was given for R146 to receive a pneumococcal immunization. The medical record revealed R146 had not yet received the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-08-30 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the nurse staffing data was posted daily resulting in the potential for all 171 residents as well as visitors to be uninformed of the facility's staffing information. Findings include: On 8/30/23 at 12:34 PM, approached Director of Nursing (DON) B to inquire regarding the facility's daily posting of nurse staffing information as unable to locate the posting at/around main entrance, north or south unit nurses' station or at/around building entrance on rehabilitation unit. DON B stated that she was unaware of where posting was located, questioned [NAME] President of Human Resources (VP/HR) D, and proceeded to south unit nurses' station as per VP/HR D that was where the posting was located. As posting unable to be located at/around south unit nurses' station, DON B relayed that after contacting the facility's scheduling coordinator, that the posting was located at the facility's rehabilitation entrance. Upon approach of entrance, DON B stated that the posting should be located on the board just outside Talent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COUNTY OF INGHAM | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/1967 |
| BANAS, TERESA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 10/26/2023 |
| EDOKPOLO, DEBBIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 03/20/2025 |
| EKOLA, MARLA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 10/30/2023 |
| BRINDLEY, TINA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/15/2023 |
| HEWITT, JOSEPHINE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/28/2024 |
| MASTERS, SHIRLEY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2023 |
| MISHULIN, SVETLANA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/29/2024 |
| DELGADO, JULIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/08/2023 |
| MORRISON, MATTHEW | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $34K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235015. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.