No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Pinecrest Medical Care Facility

N15995 Main Street, Powers, MI 49874 · Government - County · 120 certified beds · (906) 497-5244 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (906) 497-5244 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (29% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
N15995 Main St · (906) 497-4360 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
N15019 Hannahville Road B 1 · (906) 466-2782 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
W3765 US-2 · (906) 497-5248 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.1%10.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.7%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder6.0%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.8%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%3.0%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.8%12.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.1%19.4%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.7%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.7%5.1%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.8%20.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.3%14.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine53.2%79.5%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.051.841.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.341.641.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
57.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.02U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.02hours / resident / day
Physical therapy

Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.02 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.4%CMS range 40.7–69.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 6.4–16.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge57.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge35.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified78.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.871.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.57
RN hours/ resident / day
0.72
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.32
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.62
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
28.8%
Total nursing turnover
20.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 75.8 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.62 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.82 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-17)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-25)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2023-07-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficiency pertains to Intakes: MI00132367 and MI135306. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services to promote healing of pressure ulcers, including one Stage 3 pressure injury which resulted in harm, for three Residents (R42, R17 and R68) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. This deficient practice resulted in delayed wound healing, worsening of condition, and increased risk of infection. Findings include: All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Times (EDST) unless otherwise noted. R42 During a wound care observation on 7/26/23 at 8:17 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) GG emptied the contents of a clear plastic bag on the prepared overbed table in R42's room. Small pieces of wound packing which were previous cut, were tossed into the bag filled with open gauze pads that had been saturated with normal saline. This contaminated the wound packing prior to application on the stage 3 pressure injury. RN GG did not bring any normal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and resident representative comprehensive information of resident appeal rights prior to transfer out of the facility for three Residents (R5, R72, and R73) of three residents reviewed for transfer and/or discharge.Findings include:Resident #5 (R5) Review of R5's EMR revealed he was emergently transferred to the emergency department on 6/28/2025 for evaluation of an acute change in condition. Further review of the EMR revealed R5's, Notice of Resident Transfer or Discharge, signed by the ADON on 6/30/2025. The notice listed the date of transfer as 6/28/2025 and the reason for the transfer to be, low grade fever, emesis x 2, increased respirations . Further review of the notice revealed the section designated to include the contact information for the SA and the state long-term care ombudsman were blank and the notice did not include any information on who to contact regarding the Resident's right to appeal the transfer. It was noted in review, the Notice of Resident Transfer or Discharge, and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the Pre-admission Screening (PAS)/Annual Resident Review (ARR) (PASARR) determination for three Residents (#3, #48, and #57) out of three residents reviewed for PASARR, resulting in the potential for delayed mental health services and unmet psychosocial needs. Findings include: All time recorded in Easter Daylight Time (EDT), unless otherwise noted. Resident #48 (R48) Review of the medical record revealed R48 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included dementia with psychotic disturbances. According to R48's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed R48 scored a 5 out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS – a cognitive screening tool) and had no behaviors. R48 required assistance with toileting, showering/bathing, getting dressed and personal hygiene. Record review revealed a PASARR (Level I - 3877), dated 6/19/25 indicated R48 had a current diagnosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough trauma assessment to identify triggers and follow-up on identified concerns related to suicidal ideation for one Resident (12) of one resident reviewed for Trauma-Informed Care, resulting in the potential for the Resident to experience re-traumatization, feelings of low self-worth, worsening depression and fear. Findings include: All times recorded in Eastern Daylight Time (EDT), unless otherwise noted.Resident #12 (R12)Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/21/2025, revealed R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including spinal cord injury, quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), autonomic dysreflexia (life-threatening, uncontrolled increase in blood pressure), and anxiety disorder. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed R12 was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for all care.An observation on 7/16/2025 at 9:30 AM, revealed R12 awake and lying in bed, listening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    All times are in Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) unless otherwise noted Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement an infection prevention and control program in accordance with facility policies to prevent the potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections as evidenced by failure to: 1. Document signs and symptoms of infections. 2. Conduct departmental surveillance for adherence to infection control practices. 3. Handle meal trays for residents in transmission-based precautions in accordance with facility policy. 4. Provide barriers for insulin pens during medication administration. 5. Ensure urinary catheter drainage bag and tubing remained off the floor. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for the transmission of pathogens between residents and the spread of infectious organisms to all 63 residents in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program was reviewed with the Infection Preventionist (IP) on 7/24/24 at 10:47 a.m. The IP explained the facility used a line list as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY All times are in Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) unless otherwise noted Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise or update care plans to reflect residents' status for five Residents (R50, R39, R20, R32, and R29) of seventeen residents reviewed for care plans. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for inadequate care and unmet care needs. Findings include: The infection surveillance line list for July 2024 documented eleven residents with signs and symptoms of infections. Ten of the eleven residents received antibiotic therapy for infections. During an interview with the facility Infection Preventionist (IP) on 7/24/24 at 10:47 a.m., the IP was asked if care plans were developed for residents with symptomatic infections or if current care plans were amended and updated to include interventions for infections. The IP responded, some of them. Four of the residents listed on July 2024 line-listing were reviewed with the IP for care plans. Resident #50 (R50) was diagnosed with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to meet the needs of the residents. This deficient practice resulted in an inability to provide needed services as voiced by 10 of 10 residents in attendance at a confidential group meeting and in an inability to sufficiently supervise 4 of 4 residents (R3, R17, R41, and R23) residing on the dementia unit. Findings include: All times are in Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) unless otherwise noted. On 7/23/24 at 11:30 AM, a confidential group meeting was held with ten residents of the facility. In this meeting Resident C1 stated there was a poor attitude among the Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs). C1 stated, the CNAs did not want to listen and would say, they have been doing this for 15 years an implied they knew it all. C2 stated the CNAs do not seem to come in my room. C1 explained when she turns on her call light for help, the staff turn off the light and I have had accidents and have sat in soil for an hour or more.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to 1.) safely securing narcotic medications in one of two medication rooms; 2.) not dating biologicals in one of three medication carts reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST) unless otherwise specified. On [DATE] at 8:45 AM, an observation was made of the 200-hall medication cart. The 200-medication cart was found to have the following: a. Two undated and opened insulin pens; An observation was made on [DATE] at 8:20 AM, of the first-floor medication storage room. The first-floor medication storage room was found to have the following: a. Two vials and one liquid dropper bottle of lorazepam (scheduled II controlled substance) in a small refrigerator with no secondary lock. LPN T confirmed the lorazepam, which is a controlled substance should be under two locks. On [DATE] at 8:30 AM, an observation was made of LPN H preparing medication pass for a Resident #14 (R14) and LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY All times are in Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) unless otherwise noted Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor the advanced directive for one Resident (R20) of four residents reviewed for advance directives. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for residents' decisions regarding end-of-life care and medical care to not be followed by the facility. Findings include: Resident #20 (R20) R20's medical record included an order for Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). R20 signed an Advanced Directive (AD) on July 2, 2014. The AD documented, in part: .I want my life to be prolonged by life-sustaining treatment unless I am in a coma or vegetative state which my doctor reasonably believes to be irreversible . A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented R20 was not in a vegetative state or coma. The AD further read, in part: . Once my doctor has reasonably concluded that I will remain unconscious for the rest of my life, I do not want life-sustaining treatment to be provided or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report potential abuse to the State Agency as required for two Resident (R23 and R45) of three Residents reviewed for abuse reporting. Findings include: All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST) unless otherwise specified. Resident #45 (R45) According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/10/24, R45 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment and scored 03/15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment, with diagnoses including dementia and anxiety. On 7/25/24 at 9:45 AM, an observation was made of R45 in her bathroom being toileted with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) P and CNA Q. R45 was sitting on the toilet and was noted to have a quarter sized circular bruise on her right thigh. Both CNA P and CNA Q were asked how long the bruise had been on R45's right thigh and if it was reported to management and replied, We are not sure. Neither of us had worked in the last couple of days. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to investigate potential abuse to the State Agency as required for two Resident (R#23 and R#45) of three Residents reviewed for abuse investigating. Findings include: All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST) unless otherwise specified. Resident #45 (R45) According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/10/24, R45 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment and scored 03/15 which indicates severe cognitive impairment, with diagnoses including dementia and anxiety. On 7/25/24 at 9:45 AM, an observation was made of R45 in her bathroom being toileted with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) P and CNA Q. R45 was sitting on the toilet and was noted to have a quarter sized circular bruise on her right thigh. Both CNA P and CNA Q were asked how long the bruise had been on R45's right thigh and if it was reported to management and replied, We are not sure. Neither of us had worked in the last couple of days. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written transfer notification to the resident and resident's representative including reason, effective dates, and the location to which the resident was being transferred for one Resident (R39), of two residents reviewed for transfers out of the facility. Findings include: All times are recorded in Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) unless otherwise noted. Resident #39 (R39) The medical record for R39 revealed a transfer to the hospital on 7/9/23. The medical record did not indicate a written notification of transfer was given to R39 or sent to her representative. During an interview on 7/25/24 at 10:58 AM, Administrative Staff C stated she did not send written notifications of hospitalization stays to any residents or their representatives. She was not aware this was required. Staff C stated the previous person in her position had retired. The facility policy titled Transfer and Discharge dated 7/2024 was provided and read in part: 12. Emergency Transfers/Discharges - initiated by the facility for medical reasons to an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for two Residents (R41 and R54) of 17 residents reviewed for care planning. This deficient practice resulted in the lack of care plan goals and interventions, with the potential for unmet needs. Findings include: All times are recorded in Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) unless otherwise noted. Resident #54 (R54) R54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute and chronic respiratory failure, congestive heart failure, diabetes, major depressive disorder, panic disorder, anxiety disorder, dementia and multiple fracture history. On 7/22/24 the facility presented a matrix with all residents listed which included conditions and concerns. R54 was listed as End of Life Care/Comfort Care/ Palliative Care. The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) reflected weights of: 7/22/24 187.0 pounds 6/24/24 199.0 pounds 4/22/24 220.0 pounds 1/22/24 232.0 pounds These weights indicated a 6% weight loss in one month, a 9%…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide medication administration to meet professional standards 1.) administer antibiotics according to physician order and 2.) flush peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) for one Resident #32 of four residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST) unless otherwise specified. Resident #32 (R32) Review of R32's physician order, dated 6/27/24, revealed an order for vancomycin 750 mg (milligrams) / 150 ml (milliliters), intravenously one time a day for sepsis until 8/6/24. On 7/23/24 at 7:50 AM, medication administration was observed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) R for R32. LPN R accessed R32's PICC line using a 10 ml (milliliter) syringe filled with normal saline solution. LPN R failed to check for a blood return prior to administering the saline solution into the PICC line. R32's PICC line dressing was observed dated 7/10/24 indicating when the last time the dressing was changed. On 7/23/24 at 8:10 AM, an interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the nutritional needs and preferences for two Residents (R29 and R54) of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. This deficient practice resulted in residents not receiving prescribed diet, food preferences, experiencing thirst, and potential risk for physical decline. Findings include: All times are in Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) unless otherwise noted. Resident #29 (R29) R29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphasia (difficulty swallowing) , spasms of the esophagus, dementia, heart failure and stroke with left side paralysis. The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the physician diet Order Summary: Start dated 11/1/23, Regular diet Pureed texture, Nectar/Mildly Thick consistency . texture varies per DPOA (Durable Power of Attorney) sm (small) portions, gravy w/pureed meat, extra gravy on side, super cereal at B(breakfast), super spuds L (lunch); magic cup thawed or yogurt as dessert, nectar water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides completed required dementia training and demonstrated the skills and techniques necessary to care for residents for three contracted Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs F, AA and BB) of three contract nursing staff reviewed for competency evaluation, resulting in the potential for unmet physical and psychosocial needs for all 63 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: All times recorded in Eastern Daylight Time (EDT), unless otherwise noted. A review of CNA F's competency evaluation as provided by Human Resources Director, Staff Z on 7/24/2024 at 3:36 p.m., revealed a Skills Checklist by [contract company], dated 5/03/2024. Further review of the Skills Checklist, revealed the checklist to be a self-evaluation completed by CNA F indicating how frequently she performed tasks and how proficient she felt at the listed tasks. Further review of the documents provided by Staff Z revealed no further evaluation of CNA F's skills. Review of CNA F's education roster titled Core Mandatory Exam - Nursing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than five percent, with three errors identified out of 30 opportunities, affecting two Residents (R30 and R32) of four residents observed for medication administration, resulting in a medication error rate of 10.00 percent. Findings include: All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST) unless otherwise specified. On 7/23/24 at 7:50 AM, medication administration was observed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) R for R30. LPN R was observed dispensing one torsemide 20 mg tab. LPN R was asked how many she dispensed and replied, One. That is how many he gets. After medications were verified, LPN R was made aware R30 had a recent order change related to drug amount for torsemide dispensed by pharmacy. Prior orders for R30 were to dispense one 40 mg tab and current supply was 20 mg. Review of R30's physician order, dated 7/12/24, revealed the current order for torsemide 20 mg, was to give 2 tablets by mouth one time a day for edema. On 7/24/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adaptive dining equipment for two Residents (R22 & R29) of three residents reviewed for adaptive dining equipment needs. This deficient practice resulted in increased difficulty with food consumption and independent eating with the potential for decreased food/fluid intake and risk for weight loss. Findings include: All times are in Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) unless otherwise noted. Resident #22 (R22) On 7/22/24 at approximately 1:20 PM, the lunch meal was observed for R22. The meal tray card indicated Colored Plates be provided. R22 had her meal served on a white plate. During an interview on 7/22/24 at 1:49 PM, when asked for the purpose of the colored plates, Dietary aide (Staff) J explained they were used for those residents who were visually challenged. During an interview on 7/22/24 at 3:07 PM, R22 stated, I need colored plates. I am legally blind. R22 said they did not get one today. The Electronic Medical Record (EMR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a complete infection control program, including an outbreak line listing and surveillance mapping during an RSV (contageous respiratory illness) outbreak in the facility that had the potential to affect all 65 vulnerable residents in the facility. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for sustained spread of RSV within the facility resident population. Findings include: During an interview on 1/16/24 at 1:23 p.m., Infection Preventionist (IP) F and Registered Nurse (RN) Supervisor G were asked for the outbreak line listing and surveillance tracking map for the RSV outbreak in the facility. (IP) F said a line listing for the RSV had not been completed, nor had there been any surveillance mapping to identify RSV illness as it occurred in affected individuals. IP F stated, We did have an outbreak of RSV . [Resident R1] on 12/22/23 was suspected of having RSV. When asked for the name of the Resident with the first case of RSV in the facility, IP F stated, Give me just a second, as she looked through her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficiency pertains to Intakes MI00134358, MI00132367, and MI00131319. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to provide nursing related services, assure resident safety, and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, based on resident acuity and diagnoses of the resident population. This deficient practice resulted in unmet resident care needs and inadequate supervision to prevent and respond to resident needs. Findings include: All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Times (EDST) unless otherwise noted. Observation during breakfast on 7/19/23 at 8:58 a.m., found 10 residents seated in the dining room without nursing supervision while the meal trays were consumed. Two Dietary Aides (Staff); U and V, were present in the kitchen who prepared and delivered the individual meal trays to each resident. During an interview on 7/19/23 at 9:00 a.m., Staff U and V were asked if any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This deficiency pertains to Intakes: MI00134358, MI00132367, MI00131319. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform annual licensed nurse and nurse aide competency evaluations and ensure licensed nursing staff and certified nurse aides (CNAs) had the specific competencies, skill sets, and techniques necessary to care for two Residents (R4 and R42] of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcer and catheter care. This deficient practice resulted in improper catheter and wound care technique and the potential for worsening of condition for both residents and had the potential to affect all facility residents. Findings include: All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Times (EDST) unless otherwise noted. Resident R4 During a catheter care observation for R4 on 7/21/23 at 10:36 a.m., CNA LL began catheter care with cleansing of the catheter tubing. CNA LL held the tubing, approximately one inch from the urethral opening, and cleansed downward four times. The tubing near the urethra was never cleansed. The tubing was rinsed, and CNA LL took the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-07-27 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficiency pertains to MI00134358, MI00132367, MI00131319. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was designated and served as the Director of Nursing (DON) on a full-time basis. This deficient practice resulted in the inability to provide in-person supervision over the activities of the Nursing Department. This deficiency had the ability to affect all 68 facility residents. Findings include: All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Times (EDST) unless otherwise noted. During a telephone interview on 7/19/23 at 8:31 p.m., Staff CCC was asked about the absence of the DON in the building. Staff CCC stated, Our DON has been working from home, but I know she is getting paid, because she calls in to the morning meeting. She has been working from home since March. You can't expect the survey to succeed when she has been working from home since March . [The DON] has the DON (work) cell phone and we have to call her and notify her if someone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-07-27 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This deficiency pertains to Intakes MI000134358, MI00132367, and MI00131319. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete performance reviews of all nurse aide at least once every 12 months. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for quality-of-care concerns related to lack of training to meet the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA's) performance-based education needs. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 68 vulnerable residents in the facility. Findings include: All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST) unless otherwise noted. During an interview on 7/26/23 at 7:52 a.m., Administrative Staff T was asked for performance reviews for five staff members pulled yesterday for review. Staff T stated, We don't have any (performance reviews). The managers of the department are responsible for the department performance reviews - such as the DON (Director of Nursing) for nurses. (With) all the changes and the instability in the nursing level, there is nobody to perform them because the DON is working from home. Administrative staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-07-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as evidenced by failing to label, date, and store food to ensure it was kept free from contamination and failed to properly clean areas with a potential to contaminate food during preparation. This deficient practice had the potential to result in food borne illness among any or all 39 residents in the facility. Findings include: All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST) unless otherwise specified. During the initial tour of the kitchen with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) N and CDM O on 07/18/23 at 11:45 AM, the walk-in freezer was observed with partially used, re-sealed, bags of broccoli, breaded fish, mixed vegetables, spinach, and asparagus, which were not dated when opened and had no use by date. CDM N stated these partially used frozen food items should be dated. CDM O agreed each item should be dated after opening. The satellite kitchens were observed with CDM O. The refrigerator in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This deficiency pertains to Intake MI00132367. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy to screen potential employees for a history of abuse by completion of reference checks for four recent hires ( Staff BB, JJ, OO, and PP) out of five staff reviewed for reference checks. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for individuals with a history of abuse to be employeed by the facility which had the potential to affect all 68 facility residents. Findings include: All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST) unless otherwise noted. Review of Staff OO's Employment Application on 7/25/23 at 2:27 p.m., revealed no reference checks were completed prior to starting employment with the facility. When asked if reference checks were available for Staff OO, Administrative (Staff) Z said no reference checks were performed. Staff Z said the reference checks were not being completed by the Director of Nursing (DON) who was responsible for the decision to hire the nursing staff employees. Staff Z said her job description did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #15 (R15) Injury of unknown origin facility reported incident dated 8/30/22: Review of R15's face sheet, dated 8/30/22, reveal R15 was a [AGE] year-old female resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including anxiety, severe intellectual disability, schizophrenia, and diabetes mellitus. Review of handwritten notes from a communication notebook between facility staff, dated 8/28/22 and timed 11p [11:00 PM] author unknown, read in part, [R15] yelled out on and off all night long. Slapped herself a few times. Left foot is hanging weird - she can't put pressure on it. Review of handwritten notes from communication notebook between facility staff, dated 8/28/22 and timed 3-7 [3:00 PM - 7:00 PM] author LPN C, read in part, .tried to transfer self to bed and was sit (sic) on floor next to w/c [wheelchair]. Looked like [R15] may attempted to transfer into bed but didn't make it. 2-person pivot with gait belt, no grimacing - stood up without issue and pivoted into bed. Note: Indicating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficient practice pertains to Intakes: MI00132367, MI00134358, MI00136498, MI00134726, MI136473 and MI00137019. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure thorough investigations were completed for allegations of abuse including injuries of unknown origin for four Residents (R9, R29, R15, and R50) out of 21 residents reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for continuation of abuse. Findings include: All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Times (EDST) unless otherwise noted. Resident R9 Review of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI), dated 5/1/23, revealed the following, in part: On May 1, 2023, at approximately 5:15pm, it was reported to me [Director of Nursing (DON)], by the RN (Registered Nurse) Supervisor, that an aide, [Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) Y], swore at a resident while trying to pick (R9) up off the floor. A witness reported that while (CNA Y) was trying to get (R9) back into her chair, she heard (CNA Y) say, 'sh*t and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-27 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — pattern
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficiency pertains to Intake MI00132367. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff were trained and knowledgeable of the location of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) equipment for basic life support for residents with a full-code status. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for the delay or inability to perform CPR as a life-saving measure for facility residents. Findings include: All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Times (EDST) unless otherwise noted. During a telephone interview on [DATE] at approximately 8:00 p.m., Confidential Staff CCC was asked about CPR equipment in the facility. Staff CCC stated, We don't have emergency crash carts, but I am pretty sure they bought some and they have been sitting in the basement for some time. We don't have any crash carts on the floor. All of our (CPR and emergency supply) stuff is really spread out about the building. I don't even know if we have a code policy. We have our oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #9 (R9) On 7/20/23 at 8:20 AM, an observation was made on the 600 hall of Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) VV assisting R9 in her wheelchair. CNA VV was pushing R9 down the 600 hall from room [ROOM NUMBER] down to the nursing station area (approximately 50 feet in distance). R9's feet were dragging on the floor below her as she sat in her wheelchair. CNA seen Surveyor witness R9 being pushed without foot pedals and immediately went to R9's room [room [ROOM NUMBER]] retrieved the foot pedals and placed them on R9's wheelchair. Review of R9's care plan, date printed 7/21/23, read in part, .I can't complete my cares on my own and need assistance of one to two staff to help me with my activities of daily living .I need my aides to .Whenever needed, use a regular wheelchair (one with a cushion, slip pads and foot pedals) . Resident #268 (R268) On 7/20/23 at 9:38 AM, an observation was made of the 600 hall of CNA VV assisting R268 in her wheelchair. CNA VV was observed pushing R268 on the 600 hall from room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from one medication cart out of four medication carts and one medication storage room out of three medication storage rooms reviewed for medication storage. This deficient practice resulted in the administration of expired insulin, the potential for decrease in potency of insulin, and medication errors. Finding include: All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST) unless otherwise specified. On 7/20/23 at 7:45 AM, an observation was made of the 500/600 hall medication cart. The 500/600 medication cart was found to have the following expired medications: a. Insulin lispro 100u (unit)/ml (milliliters), date opened 6/28/23 and expired date 7/19/23, and belonged to Resident #5 (R5); b. Insulin lispro 100u /ml, date opened 6/17/23 and expired date 7/15/23, and belonged to Resident 15 (R15); c. Insulin glargine 100u /ml, date opened 6/29/23 and expired date 7/20/23, and belonged to Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This deficiency pertains to Intakes MI00132367 and MI00134358. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respect and dignity during dining for three Residents (R9, R29, and R49) of 21 sample residents reviewed for dining. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for decreased meal consumption and dissatisfaction with dining assistance provided by facility staff. Findings include: All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST) unless otherwise noted. Resident #29 (R29) During breakfast observation on 7/19/23 at 9:07 a.m., Resident (R29) took one fork full of eggs and had great difficulty getting the eggs from the plate to their mouth. R29 picked up a half slice of toast and took a bite and then picked up a bite of eggs with a fork, but dropped the eggs onto their lap. R29 attempted to pick up the egg from his lap, unsuccessfully. R29 balanced the half-slice of toast, held in the left hand with the fork held in their right hand, supporting the toast. R29 took another bite of toast. R29 continued to try and eat the toast with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain consent for psychoactive medication for one Resident (#51) of five residents reviewed for psychoactive medications. This deficient practice resulted in Resident #51 (R51)and their Responsible Party not being informed of potential medication side effects/adverse reactions. Findings include: All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST) unless otherwise specified. A review of R51's electronic medical records (EMR) indicated an admission into the facility on 8/31/21 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, unspecified dementia, and congestive heart failure. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R51 had severely impaired cognition with a score of 3/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. The medical record documented R51 had an appointed responsible party for health care and financial decisions. A review of R51's 'Physician Orders' for July 2023 indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to facilitate resident self-determination related to dining location preference for one Resident (R3) of one resident reviewed for resident choices. This deficient practice resulted in frustration, anger, dissatisfaction with care, and feelings of helplessness when resident choices were not honored. Findings include: All times are Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST) unless otherwise noted. During an interview on 7/18/23 at approximately 1:10 p.m., R3 was asked about any concerns with nursing care. R3 stated, One nurse won't even talk to me. She will not say one word to me. [Staff AA] is the nurse. [Staff AA] makes me go to breakfast every day I am here (and she is here) - even if I don't want to. During an observation and interview on 7/21/23 at 8:35 a.m., when asked about the location of breakfast the previous day, R3 stated, [Staff AA] made me go to breakfast yesterday (in the dining room) and I did not want to go to breakfast. I want to watch TV while I am eating my breakfast. I never want to go to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This deficiency pertains to Intake MI00136498. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from verbal abuse and neglect by Staff for one Resident (R9), out of eight residents reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for fear, humiliation, and feelings of helplessness when R9 was verbally disparaged following a fall from a chair. Findings include: All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Times (EDST) unless otherwise noted. Review of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI), dated 5/1/23, revealed the following, in part: On May 1, 2023, at approximately 5:15 p.m., it was reported to me [Director of Nursing (DON)], by the RN Supervisor, that an aide, [Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) Y], swore at a resident while trying to pick her (R9) up off the floor. A witness reported that while he was trying to get her back into her chair, she heard him (CNA Y) say, 'sh*t and G*d d*mn you' to the resident . Review of R9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/20/23, revealed R9 had active diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to completely assess and establish a baseline care plan within 48 hours that included measurable goals and interventions for one Resident (#58) of two sampled residents reviewed for development of baseline care plans. This deficient practice resulted in the facility's failure to address priority risk factors and individual needs. Findings include: All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST) unless otherwise specified. The first plan of care for R58 was presented on 07/20/23 at 3:52 PM by Staff T who stated it was started on 1/2/23. A baseline care plan was not written within 48 hours of the admission on [DATE] and did not mention plans to keep R58 safe using the knowledge of R58's previous daily habits of leaving his home. According to the electronic medical record (EMR), Resident #58 (R58) was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R58,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an effective means of communication for one Resident (#50) of two residents reviewed for communication. This deficient practice resulted in Resident #50 struggling to communicate her basic needs, which resulted in feelings of frustration. Findings include: Resident #50 (R50) Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/16/23, revealed R50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including fracture (unspecified), dementia, and urinary tract infection. The assessment revealed R50 required extensive two-person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toileting, and could feed herself with set-up only. The Brief Interview for Mental (BIMS) assessment revealed a score of 3/15, which indicated R50 had severe cognitive impairment. The sensory assessment revealed R50 had clear speech, and was usually understood, and was sometimes able to understand others, had no vision impairment and wore hearing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate catheter care to prevent urinary tract infections for one Resident (R4) of one resident reviewed for catheter care. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for cross-contamination of feces and increased risk of urinary tract infection. Findings include: All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST) unless otherwise noted. During a catheter care observation for R4 on 7/21/23 at 10:36 a.m., CNA LL began catheter care with cleansing of the catheter tubing. CNA LL held the tubing, approximately one inch from the urethral opening, and cleansed downward four times. The tubing near the urethra was never cleansed. The tubing was rinsed, and CNA LL took the towel that was draped over R4's body to dry the catheter tubing with the same dirty gloves. CNA LL then used a new, wet washcloth to cleanse the right and left creases between the pubic area and the inner thigh. CNA LL wiped downward three times in the left and right thigh crease, finding brown feces on the white washcloth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-27 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the provision of trauma-informed care to mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization for one Resident (R3) of one resident reviewed for trauma-informed care. This deficient practice resulted in increased anxiety, flashbacks, and feelings of re-traumatization. Findings include: All times are Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST) unless otherwise noted. During an interview on 7/18/23 at approximately 1:10 p.m., R3 stated, This morning and all this week so far, and I have told them, and told them, and told them - I don't like men washing me up. The man put me on the bedpan, he gave me my bath this morning. Back when I was sixteen, I was [sexually assaulted], and it brings the anxiety back up. I know he won't [sexually assault] me but there is always the chance that he would. I have told them several times that I don't want a man. I have asked them to get someone else, and they say - 'He is the only one we got. It is him or nobody.' I can't do it myself. Review of R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to evaluate the use of antipsychotic medication for potential adverse consequences at least quarterly, if not more often for three Residents (#9, #36 and #51) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice resulted in the facility's failure to determine the potential for reducing or discontinuing psychoactive medications based on therapeutic goals and any adverse effects or functional impairment. Findings include: All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST) unless otherwise specified. Resident #9 (R9) The facility electronic medical records (EMR) for R9 revealed the most recent admission date of 12/29/20 with current diagnoses which included anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, recurrent, schizophrenia, unspecified, and drug induced subacute dyskinesia (unusual movements that a person cannot control). Current Physician ordered psychotropic medications included Seroquel, Lexapro, Trazadone, and Lorazepam. The EMR contained Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-27 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely radiology services in a timely manner and professional standards of practice after an unwitnessed fall for one Resident (R15) out of one resident reviewed for radiology services. This deficient practice resulted in the delay of medical treatment, diagnosis, and pain control for two fractures. Finding include: All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDST) unless otherwise specified. According to the Facility Reported Incident (FRI), dated 8/30/22, read in part, .Registered Nurse [RN S] was called into the locked unit to assess [R15's] leg, left lower extremity swollen (which she does have 2+ edema to that extremity) and bruising noted to ankle, resident was unable to move foot/toes and foot drop noted. RN called physician and order to send out to hospital for evaluation . Review of R15's face sheet, dated 8/30/22, reveal R15 was a [AGE] year-old female resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DELTA COUNTYOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST33%since 01/01/1966
DICKINSON COUNTYOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST33%since 01/01/1966
MENOMINEE COUNTYOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST33%since 01/01/1966
SMITH, DANAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/14/2021
DEAN, FLORAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/26/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-21.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$55K
Related-party expense1% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 60%Medicare 3%Other / private 37%

This home reported $55K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$453per resident / day
operating cost
$13,781per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$372per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235069. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next