Pomeroy Living Rochester Skilled Rehabilitation
3500 West South Blvd, Rochester Hills, MI 48309 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 182 certified beds · (248) 852-7800 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.5% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.0% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.8% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 4.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.4% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.0% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.4% | 19.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.7% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.4% | 5.1% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.7% | 20.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.8% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.5% | 1.1% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.1% | 79.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.8% | 24.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.9% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.35 | 1.84 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.81 | 1.64 | 1.80 | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
64.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 462 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 182 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 64.7%CMS range 59.8–68.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.4%CMS range 9.3–14.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 45.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 61.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 99.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.2% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.8%CMS range 3.8–8.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.79 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 182 beds and averages 124.9 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 57 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.34 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.75 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
40 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to the complaint: 2594578. Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to timely identify signs/symptoms of a urinary tract infection (uti), failed to consistently inform the Physician/NP (nurse practitioner) of identified signs/symptom, and failed to timely treat a uti for one (R202) of three residents reviewed for a change of condition, resulting in the resident to be hospitalized in the intensive care unit for urosepsis (urinary tract infection spreads to the bloodstream) and ultimately admitted into hospice care. Findings include:A review of a hospital Emergency Medicine consult dated 8/19/25 at 11:55 AM, documented in part . present to the Emergency. for altered mental status and hypotension. they <sic> she is acting worse than baseline. Patient is unable to provide any history at this point in time. They identified that the patient's urine is foul smelling. She does have a Foley catheter in place. Tachycardia present. Respiratory distress present. Laboratory evaluation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings Include:On 04/19/2026 at 8:45 AM initial kitchen/dietary services tour with Dietary Manager/Chef (DM) Q and Corporate Chef (CC) R. On 04/19/2026 at 9:10 AM in the dry storage area observed the floor soiled with debris along perimeter of room at floor/wall juncture and soil build-up on storage shelving. When queried about cleaning frequency of this area, DM Q agreed that noted areas needed cleaning attention.According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 4-602.13 Nonfood-Contact Surfaces. NonFOOD-CONTACT SURFACES of EQUIPMENT shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues.According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 6-501.12 Cleaning, Frequency and Restrictions. (A)PHYSICAL FACILITIES shall be cleaned as often as necessary to keep them…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to assure medications were safely secure and inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents, for two of four medication carts observed for medication storage, and observations within two resident rooms (R47, during medication administration and (R39) during initial pool interviews, and environmental observations of the community shower rooms. Findings include.On 4/19/26 at 9:00 AM, during an observation of medication administration with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C for R47, three bottles of Nystatin Powder (a topical antifungal medication) were observed stored on the resident's sink counter. LPN C commented those should not be here and was observed removing from counter. On 4/19/26 at 9:00 AM, Medication Cart #1 was observed was with LPN C for medication storage which revealed in the residential storage drawer one loose white oval pill and one loose round orange pill, not packaged and with no resident identifiers.On 4/19/26 at 10:20 AM, R39 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-21 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize an effective antibiotic stewardship program to ensure appropriate infection criteria was met, this had the ability to affect multiple residents who were prescribed antibiotics including six [R8, R30, R56, R138, R139 and R140] residents identified. Findings include:On 4/20/26 at 8:26 AM, a request was made for all the infection control surveillance books to review for the Infection Control Task.Review of January 2026 antibiotic surveillance revealed:The line listing for R138 documented UTI [urinary tract infection] with an onset date of 1/13/26, no signs or symptoms were marked no testing was indicated, and Keflex 500 mg [milligrams] twice a day for seven days was ordered. An Individual Infection Investigation for R138 with an onset date of 1/20/26 documented the UTI was facility acquired and the symptoms were, elevated temp [temperature], urine odor and that Hospice declined was written in for the date of the urine culture. The line listing for R8 documented pneumonia with an onset date of 1/14/26, symptoms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain general cleanliness and repair of the central shower rooms. This resulted in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in satisfaction of living affecting residents that use the [NAME] Unit and [NAME] Unit central shower rooms. Findings Include: On 04/20/2026 at 9:15 AM toured central shower/spa rooms with Housekeeping Director (HK) K. Observed the following in the two [NAME] Unit central shower rooms: broken/missing tiles around the shower drains and at wall corners, storage room door threshold surface rusted/deteriorating and no longer smooth and cleanable, multiple storage rooms with debris on the floor surface, including cleaning brushes and bucket, bag of grout. Observed perimeter of showering areas soiled with black mold-like substance on tiles, grout, and caulking. During this time, when queried HK K said these closets would be used by nursing and housekeeping doesn't use or clean these rooms.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to transcribe a medication as ordered from the hospital for one resident (R115) of one resident reviewed for admissions. Findings include:On 4/19/26 at 10:32 AM, R115 was interviewed and asked about their stay at the facility. R115 reported that the facility was okay, but they needed to have their staples removed so they could be discharged (back to community).A review of the medical record revealed that R115 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the admission diagnosis of Displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, Muscle weakness and other lack of coordination. A further review of the medical record revealed that on R115's discharge paperwork from the hospital provided a reference for staples to be removed and how to care for the incision site as well as listed medications to be continued at the facility.A review of the hospital discharge paperwork revealed that R115 was to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an annual OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) Level I evaluation to determine if a Level II Evaluation was needed, or if exemption was identified for one (R12) of one resident reviewed for PASARR (Preadmission Screen and Resident Review). Findings include: A review of R12's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: schizophrenia, dementia, bi-polar disease and post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A review of the resident's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) noted the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 (cognitively intact). Continued review of R12's clinical record noted a Preadmission Screening (PAS)/Annual Review (ARR) (2/25/25) document that noted the following: .Hospital Exemption Discharge.Patient (R12).Section II-Screening.Yes.The person has a diagnoses of dementia.Yes.The person has received treatment for.Dementia.Yes.The person…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services according to professional standards of practice related to failure to implement treatment according to physician orders and documenting as completed for one (R110) of one reviewed for edema, and treatment and self-administering medication for one (R135) of one reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: R135 On 4/19/26 at 9:39 AM Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C was observed entering into room A23 (R135) without donning any personal protective equipment (PPE) (for a contact isolation room) accompanied by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) who was not wearing any PPE as well. LPN C was observed, setting up a respiratory breathing treatment, applying it to the resident's face via mask, started the nebulizer machine and walked out of the room. LPC C on their way out, let the resident in room A23 (R135) know that they would be back to stop the treatment once it was complete. On 4/20/26 a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a physician order was implemented for oxygen administration for one (R8) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include:On 4/19/26 at 10:38 AM, R8 was observed sleeping in bed with 3 liters of oxygen administered via nasal cannula.A review of the medical record revealed R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included systolic and diastolic heart congestive heart failure.A review of the physician orders revealed no order implemented for the oxygen administration.A review of the care plan titled Oxygen Use with an effective date of 3/1/26, documented the following in part . With interventions implemented, my risk for hypoxia/SOB (shortness of breath) will be minimized/reduced through next review. Administer oxygen at 2L (liters)/min (minute) via nasal cannula as ordered. Observe oxygen precaution.On 4/21/26 at 8:04 AM, R8 was observed in bed with 3 liters of oxygen administered via nasal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to prevent the use of an unnecessary antibiotic for one (R11) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include:On 4/19/26 at 10:43 AM, R11 was observed fully clothed sleeping in bed. A review of the medical record revealed R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included dementia.A review of the Physician orders revealed a Nitrofurantoin Macrocrystal (antibiotic) 50 mg (milligram) capsule to be administered once daily for . lower urinary tract calculus.A review of the transferring facility medication list provided to the facility upon R11's admission documented in part . Nitrofurantoin Macrocrystal Capsule 50 mg, one capsule by mouth one time a day for prophylactic UTI (urinary tract infection), Start Date 1/24/25 Recurrent urinary tract infection - Cont (continue) Nitrofurantoin 50 mg po q (every) day prevention and wiping discussed . N39.0: Urinary tract infection, site not specified . A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to don personal protective equipment (PPE) for one Resident (R135) of one reviewed for isolation. Findings include:On 4/19/26 at 9:39 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C was observed entering into room R135's room. R135's was noted to be in contact isolation. LPN C entered the room without donning any PPE (for contact isolation-an isolation requiring staff to wear PPE upon entering) accompanied by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) who was not wearing any PPE as well. LPN C was observed setting up a respiratory breathing treatment, applying it to the resident's face via mask, started the nebulizer machine and walked out of the room. On 4/20/26 a review of the medical record revealed that R135 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the admission diagnosis of Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Enterocolitis due to Clostridium difficile (a highly contagious infection of the bowel), and Obstructive sleep apnea. On 4/20/26 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 29 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to the complaint: 2594578. Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to order laboratory tests as directed by the Physician/Nurse Practitioner, ensure timely/efficient laboratory services, ensure promptly notify the Physician of abnormal results and failed to develop a policy and/or procedure for ordering laboratory test, obtaining & reporting abnormal values to the Physician for one (R202) of three residents reviewed for a change in condition. Findings include: A review of the medical record revealed R202 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of dementia. The resident was documented to have severely impaired cognition and required staff assistance for all activities of daily living.A review of a nursing note dated 8/12/25 at 2:54 PM, documented in part . Writer noted cloudy and discoloration to urine, increased confusion and resident presented with back pain. NP (nurse practitioner) in house and ordered for urine dip and if positive to send out. Writer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 2/25/25 between 8:35 AM-9:15 AM, during an initial observation of the kitchen, the following items were observed: In the walk-in cooler, there was dried up milk on the floor underneath the milk crates. The inside bottom shelf of the Victory freezer was soiled with food spills and food debris. On 2/25/25 at 9:00 AM, Corporate Chef Y confirmed the soiled flooring in the walk-in cooler and inside the Victory freezer, and stated they would be cleaned right away. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 4-602.13 Nonfood-Contact Surface, Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues. The ceiling vent located near the ice machine was coated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-27 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment was reviewed and revised in accordance with current regulatory requirements. This has the potential to affect all 117 residents. Findings include: According to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) memo: QSO (Quality Safety & Oversight)-24-13-NH, dated 6/18/2024, revised Facility Assessment requirements effective 8/8/2024 included: .In conducting the facility assessment, the facility must ensure .Active involvement of the following participants in the process: (i) Nursing home leadership and management, including but not limited to, a member of the governing body, the medical director, an administrator, and the director of nursing/ and (ii) Direct care staff, including but not limited to, RNs (Registered Nurse), LPNs (Licensed Practical Nurse)/LVNs (Licensed Vocational Nurse), NAs (Nurse Aide), and representatives of the direct care staff, if applicable. (iii) The facility must also solicit and consider input received from residents, resident representatives, and family members .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP)policies and protocols were followed and maintained for three residents (R48, 53, & and 78), maintain linen carts, as well as a system of surveillance that consistently documented signs and symptoms of infections and consistently tracked and trended infections, this had the ability to affect all 117 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's Infection Control program revealed the following: The program revealed no consistent documentation of signs and symptoms and laboratory (Lab) data results for residents with infections that were listed for the months of January 2025 and February 2025. On 2/27/25 at 10:25 AM an interview with the facility's infection control preventionist (ICP) and the Director of clinical services was asked about the missing Lab data and signs and symptoms for the line listing for the months for January and February, and who was responsible for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored appropriately for one resident (R367) of one resident reviewed for medication storage as well as properly stored, labeled, and dated in five of five medication carts reviewed. Findings include: R367 On 2/25/25 at 12:06 PM, R367 was observed lying on their back in bed. An interview was conducted with the resident at that time. Observed on their bedside table was a tube of Triad ointment. A review of the medical record revealed no documentation or assessment of R367 to be able to self-administer the Triad ointment. On 2/27/25 at 12:26 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) A (who covered the medical care/questions as the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) was not present for the survey) was interviewed and asked about the Triad ointment observed by R367's bedside and ADON A replied that R367 is unable to apply the ointment to themselves and that the ointment should have been stored in the treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure water was provided and kept within resident's reach for one resident, (R33) of one resident reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings include: On 2/25/25 at 9:39 AM, R33 was observed sleeping in their bed. It was further observed R33 had no water for drinking at their bedside. An observation of their bedside table situated parallel to the bed on the left side revealed a typed note taped to the top that read, PLEASE place this tray table above her abdomen so she can reach her drink! .She is often dehydrated as table & water is out of reach . Further review of the room revealed a chalkboard on the bathroom door that read, Keep my water within my limited reach of Rt (right) hand. On 2/25/25 at 2:32 PM, 2/26/25 at 8:48 AM, 10:05 AM, and 2:30 PM, R33 was observed in their bed. The tray table with water for drinking was observed to the left side of the bed, out of reach from their right hand. A review of R33's care plan was conducted and read, .ADL (activities of daily living)-Decreased ability to self…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow end of life wishes for one of one resident (R417) reviewed for advance directives. Findings include: On [DATE] at 1:43 PM, during and interview, R417 was asked about their end of life wishes. R417 reported, they did not want to receive Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) because R417 did not want their chest to be cracked open and be placed on a breathing tube. R417 was then asked who was responsible for making medical decisions for them, R417 stated that they would be in control of decision making until they were unable to do so. R417 reported, they signed a paper the day before to become a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). A review of the record revealed that R417 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of depression, anxiety and COVID-19. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, which indicated no cognitive impairments. The record also revealed that R417 was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00148138. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow nursing professional standards of practice related to medication administration for two (R29 and R368) of two residents reviewed for professional standards. Findings include: R29 Review of the clinical record revealed R29 was admitted into the facility on 7/8/23 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R29 had intact cognition, had orders for insulin and received insulin injections for seven of the last seven days. Review of the physician orders identified R29 was to have their blood sugar (BS) level checked at 7:30 AM and parameters were in place to administer insulin depending on what the BS result was. On 2/26/25 at 9:45 AM, review of R29's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the was no documentation (blank) for if this had been completed as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to consistently provide assistance for oral care for a dependent resident, one (R58) of three residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Findings include: On 2/25/25 at 11:00 AM, R58 was observed in the community room playing a game with their daughter. R58 was asked if they had any concerns with the facility's care. R58's daughter replied that their dad always made sure their hygiene was up to par and they had concerns with the staff not assisting R58 with brushing their teeth. R58's daughter explained that R58 can brush their own teeth if staff set up their tooth brush and tooth paste and handed R58 their toothbrush, however staff were not ensuring the assistance was being provided. R58 was asked if staff assisted with brushing their teeth this morning and R58 replied No. A review in the medical record revealed R58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: traumatic subdural hemorrhage encounter,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00150390. Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to timely implement a fungal rash treatment (R372), timely implement treatment for edema (R85) and failed to obtain a physician ordered blood sugar level (R48), for three of 24 sampled residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: R372 On 2/25/25 at 12:47 PM, R372 was observed lying on their back in bed. R372's husband was observed sitting by the bedside. When asked about any concerns R372 had, R372's husband explained that R372 was prescribed an ointment in the hospital for a fungal rash that had started on R372's buttocks. R372's husband stated the hospital noted the cream on R372's discharge paperwork however they believed the facility failed to implement the treatment. R372's husband stated they saw the rash yesterday and it worsened and spread to R372's groin area. R372's husband stated they are in the facility every day and all day, except overnight and they had never seen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor documented weights and ensure timely nutritional interventions were implemented to prevent significant weight loss for one resident (R23) of four residents reviewed for nutrition, resulting in a 22.94% weight loss from October 30, 2024 to December 2, 2024. Findings include: On 2/25/25 at approximately 10:27 a.m., R23 was observed in their wheelchair in the common area. R23 was observed to be thin and was queried if they had lost any weight and they reported that they had. On 2/25/25 the medical record for R23 was reviewed and revealed the following: R23 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Moderate protein-calorie malnutrition and - Chronic kidney disease, stage 3. A review of R23's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date of 1/29/25 revealed R23 needed assistance from facility staff with most of their activities of daily living. R23's BIMS score (brief interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5% when three medication errors were made for two residents (R#'s 12 and 50) of four residents reviewed during the medication pass observation, resulting in a medication error rate of 10.34%. Findings include: On 2/25/25 at 10:21 AM, Nurse 'U' was observed preparing medications for administration to R12. Nurse 'U' prepared multiple medications including a 10 mg cetrizine (allergy medication) tablet. They said R12 had a 5 mg (milligram) midorine (medication to treat low blood pressure) tablet due at that time and they were going to hold it because R12's blood pressure and heart rate were too low for administration. They reported R12's blood pressure was 115/58 and their heart rate was 58. Nurse 'U' proceeded to R12's room and administered the prepared medications. Upon completion of the administration, Nurse 'U' signed the medications out in the medication administration record. On 2/25/25 at 3:51 PM, a review of R12's physician's orders and medication administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement an effective antibiotic stewardship program that included consistent implementation of protocols for appropriate antibiotic use for three (R418, R29 and R97) of three residents. Findings include: R418 A review of R418 record revealed that in the month of January they were started on Keflex (antibiotic) 500 milligrams (mg) twice a day for five days. The physician also ordered labs. There was no documentation of any signs and symptoms for the need for the antibiotic or labs. R418 arrived from the hospital on contact precautions for clostridium difficile (c. diff-an infection of the bowel often caused by the over use of antibiotics) and was prescribed an antibiotic that started 1/6/25 and was supposed to continue for 10 days, however the order was not transcribed correctly upon admission. R29 A review of R29's medical record revealed that in the month of February 2025, they were prescribed ertapenem antibiotic without a start date and that the first dose was not given. R97 A review of R97's medical record revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY R406 R406 was a long-term resident, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R406's admitting diagnoses included lung cancer, respiratory failure, heart failure, anxiety disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Based on the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, R406 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 15/15, indicative of intact cognition. An initial observation was completed on 10/15/24 at approximately 10:30 AM. During an interview R406 reported that they had a concern about cold food. R406 added that they preferred to eat in their room and the food was cold on most days. When queried further if that any pattern such as any particular meal or days, R406 reported that it was lunch and dinner that was served cold. R406 added that cold breakfast was also an issue on some days. R406 reported that meat gets overcooked and tough. During the interview R406's spouse was present in the room. They reported that it was an ongoing concern. Later that day at approximately,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake(s): MI00146420, MI00146542, MI00146558, MI00145342, & MI00147417. Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure medications and treatments were administered/applied as prescribed by the physician, failed to ensure the timely administration of medications and failed to treat a change of condition timely for three (R's 401, 402, & 403) of five residents reviewed for medications/treatments. Findings include: R402 A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented concerns of the facility's failure to address R402's change of condition timely which resulted the R402 leaving the facility Against Medical Advice (AMA). A review of the medical record revealed R402 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged against medical advice on 7/22/24. R402 was admitted with diagnoses that included: aftercare following surgery, absence of left leg below the knee A review of the medical record revealed the following progress notes: A Nursing note…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake(s) #'s MI00145342 and MI00146542. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide oxygen (O2) services per physician order for two (R401 and R403) out of five residents reviewed for respiratory services resulting in R401's O2 saturation levels dropping to an extremely low level requiring immediate hospitalization. Findings include: R401 A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged on 7/2/24, R401 was sent to an outside medical appointment with their pulmonologist with an empty Oxygen (O2) tank. The resident's 02 saturation level dropped to 80% (a low level requiring immediate medical attention-normal readings are between 90-100%). The physician's office attempted to use an oxygen concentrator to improve the resident's oxygen level however they were unable to do so. The physician's office then sent R401 via EMS (emergency medical services) to the hospital. A review of R401's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number(s): MI00144974. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete skin assessments on a consistent basis and thoroughly complete assessments of existing pressure ulcers for one (R702) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency revealed an allegation the facility was not providing adequate and appropriate care to prevent and treat pressure sores. On 6/26/24 at approximately 9:15 AM, R702 was observed in bed eating breakfast with the assistance of a staff member. R702 was lying on their back positioned slightly to their left side. On 6/26/24 at 12:23 PM, R702 was heard making a groaning noise from the hallway. R702 was lying in bed on their back positioned slightly to their left side as they were earlier in that day. When asked if he needed help, R702 groaned and was not able to answer the question. At that time, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 'B' asked R702 if he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen and equipment in a sanitary manner, and failed to ensure food items were dated and discarded when expired. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 3/4/24 between 9:10 AM-9:30 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen with Dietary Manager (DM) I, the following items were observed: In the walk-in cooler, there was a large puddle of spilled milk on the floor, bloody meat juices on a tray where a vacuum sealed, cooked ham was stored, an undated container of sliced deli ham, and a container of cottage cheese with a best-by date of 2/16. DM I confirmed the ham should have been dated and stated the cottage should have been discarded. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 3-302.11 Packaged and Unpackaged Food - Separation, Packaging, and Segregation, (A) Food shall be protected from cross contamination by: .(2) Except when combined as ingredients, separating types of raw animal foods from each other such as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that meals were served at a preferred temperature and in a palatable manner for two (R212 and R213) and multiple anonymous residents who attended the resident council meeting. This deficient practice had the potential to affect residents that received meals. Findings include: On 3/4/24 at approximately 9:43 AM, R212 was observed sitting in their room. A full breakfast tray was on the tray table next to where they were sitting. The resident was alert and able to answer questions. When asked about life in the facility, R212 reported that they had been in the building for over a week and that most things, with the exception of the food, where going ok. R212 stated that they did not eat their breakfast of eggs, hashbrown and toast because it was served cold. R212 further noted that it was not the first time their food was served cold, and, on another occasion, they did not provide utensils at dinner. On 3/4/24 at approximately 10:15 AM, R213 was observed in their room. When asked about care in the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation has two deficient practices. Deficient Practice Statement #1 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene for six residents (R362, R364, R13, R37, R1, R3) of six observed during medication administration resulting in the potential for the spread of infection. Findings include: Resident 362 and Resident 364 On 3/5/24 at 8:27 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) T was observed for medication preparation and administration for R362 and R364. Hand hygiene was not performed pre and post administration to both residents. When questioned to LPN T if hand hygiene was performed, LPN T acknowledged hand hygiene was not completed it and should have been. On 3/6/24 at 02:16 PM, The Director Of Nursing (DON) was informed by this surveyor that hand hygiene was not performed during medication administration between residents. The DON confirmed that staff should be performing hand hygiene before and after resident contact. Review of the facilities Infection Prevention Manual, Hand Hygiene Policy Revised June 2013 stated: .All…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate size pull-up underwear (facility provided single-use disposable underwear) was provided for two residents (R20 and R218) of two residents reviewed for accommodation of resident needs. Findings include: R20 On 3/04/24 at approximately 9:54 a.m., R20 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R20 was queried if they had any concerns regarding their care and they indicated that their pullups they were wearing were too tight and that the facility had ran out of XXL and only provided them XL (extra-large) and not XXL. R20 indicated that they are Supposed to have XXL pullups and the XL ones they had been provided were too small. R20's bathroom was observed to contain a package of XL pull-ups with two remaining in the package. R20's closet was observed to contain a sizing sign that indicated R20 was to have XXL pullups. On 3/5/24 at approximately 9:48 a.m., R20 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R20 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident's rooms were maintained in a clean, comfortable and homelike manner for five (R1, R13, R17, R30, R49) of five residents reviewed for the environment. Findings include: On 3/4/24 at 9:52 AM, R49 was observed lying in bed. The sink in R49's room, located outside of the bathroom was observed to be cracked. The sink was porcelain and was noted to have several cracks with a piece of porcelain missing around the metal drain at the base, causing a sharp edge which created a safety hazard for residents. R13 shares the same room with R49. On 3/4/24 at 9:59 AM, R1 was observed sitting in a wheelchair next to his bed. The sink, located outside of the bathroom was observed to be cracked. The sink had a hard, plastic coating that was cracked including a large crack which created a raised, sharp area on the back side of the basin portion of the sink, which created a safety hazard for residents. R30 shares the same room with R1. On 3/5/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Deficient Practice Statement #1 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were documented in the medical record accurately per professional standards for two residents (R15 and R362) resulting in the potential for inaccurate medical records and missed care needs. Findings include: R362 Clinical record review revealed R362 was admitted to this facility on 2/16/24 for admitting diagnosis of lung cancer, hypertension (high blood pressure) and peripheral vascular disease. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of ten, indicating a moderately impaired cognition. On 3/5/24 at 8:27 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) T was observed for medication preparation and administration for R362. During preparation LPN T stated the ordered Metoprolol and Amlodipine (medications used to treat high blood pressure) were not going to be administered for R362 as the blood pressure taken prior registered low at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure necessary labs were completed for a resident with an observed change in condition for one (R219) of three residents reviewed for pain/catheter care/laboratory services. Findings include: On 3/4/24 at approximately 9:54 AM, R219 was observed lying in bed. The resident was moaning and had their hand on their stomach and appeared thin. A full breakfast tray containing an egg, hashbrown patty, toast and a bowl of oatmeal was on the table next to the resident. When asked about care provided in the facility, the resident was not able to provide a verbal response. A review of R219's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: need for assistance with personal care, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition and dysphagia following a cerebral infarction. A review of the resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practices Deficient Practice #1 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure interventions to prevent injury from falling were provided for one resident (R93) of one residents reviewed for accidents/hazards. Findings include: On 3/4/24 at approximately 1:45 p.m., R93 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R93's family member (guardian) was present during observation and was queried if R93 had any falls in the facility and they indicated that they have fallen out of the bed. At that time, no mat preventing injury from falling out of the bed was observed next to R93's bed. On 3/5/24 at approximately 8:48 a.m., R93 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R93 was observed to be in a lower bed. R93 reported they had urinated in their bed and were waiting for some help. R93 was observed not to have a fall mat ( a floor mat utilized to prevent injury from falling) next to their bed. On 3/5/24 at approximately 3:09 p.m., R93 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate urology services was provided for one resident (R98) reviewed for urinary catheters, resulting in the increased likelihood of a urinary tract infection. Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed R98 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with admitting diagnosis of a neurogenic bladder (chronic suprapubic catheter), schizophrenia, congestive heart failure, and diabetes. Review of the Minimum Data (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Brief Interview for Mental status (BIMS) score as unable to determine. On 3/4/24 at 10:00 AM, R98 was observed lying in bed asleep. A urinary catheter bag was hanging from the lower left bed frame. The urinary drainage bag had approximately 400 milliliter (ml) straw colored urine. Inside the drainage tubing was considerable amounts of thick pus-like, white, cloudy sediment. On 3/4/24 at 2:04 PM, A second observation was made to R98 and revealed the urinary catheter bag…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with a history of protein-calorie malnutrition received weekly weights and 1:1 feeding as ordered for one (R219) of two residents reviewed for nutrition/hydration. Findings include: On 3/4/24 at approximately 9:54 AM, R219 was observed lying in bed. The resident was moaning and had their hand on their stomach and appeared thin. A full breakfast tray containing an egg, hashbrown patty, toast and a bowl of oatmeal was on the table next to the resident. When asked about the full plate of food as well as care provided in the facility, R219 was not able to answer. A review of R219's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: need for assistance with personal care, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition and dysphagia following a cerebral infarction. A review of the resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently ensure the physicians review, action and rationale of identified medication irregularities documented by the Pharmacy monthly medication reviews were documented and maintained in the resident's medical record for one (R55) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: On 3/4/24 the medical record for R55 was reviewed and revealed the following: R55 was initially admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including: depression and high cholesterol. A review of R55's MDS (minimum data set), dated 1/22/24 revealed R55 had a BIMS score (brief interview of mental status) of 5, indicating a severely impaired cognition. A review of the monthly medication regimens reviewed for R55 revealed the following dates in which irregularities were noted by the pharmacist during their monthly review: 11/15/23, 12/21/23, 1/3/24, 2/24/24. Further review of the medical record revealed no documentation that the physician had acknowledged the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a laboratory diagnostic was completed in a timely manner per Physician's order for one resident (R20) of one residents reviewed for laboratory diagnostics. Findings include: On 3/4/24 the medical record for R20 was reviewed and revealed the following: R20 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Overactive bladder and Irritable bowel syndrome. A review of R20' MDS (Minimum data Set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/25/24 revealed R20 had a BIMS score (brief interview for mental status) of 12 indicating moderately impaired cognition. A Physicians order dated 12/6/23 revealed the following: Check UA (urine analysis) with culture A second Physician's order dated 12/28/2023 revealed the following: Check UA with culture A Physician's evaluation dated 12/6/23 revealed the following: History of Present Illness: Patient is a [R20 demographics] here for long-term care. No chest…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENID BARDEN FAMILY 2005 IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 28% | since 11/01/2007 |
| POMEROY FAMILY INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 72% | since 11/01/2007 |
| POMEROY, KEITH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/01/2007 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235477. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.