No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Healthsource Saginaw, Inc

3340 Hospital Rd, Saginaw, MI 48603 · Government - County · 213 certified beds · (989) 790-7700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$208,810 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $208,810 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-04)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6300 State St · (989) 797-7546 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5825 Brockway Rd · (989) 497-8112 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3005 Lawndale Rd · (989) 793-5659 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Hospital Road · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.3%10.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.8%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.1%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.8%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.1%3.0%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.9%12.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.9%19.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.8%5.1%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.1%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.9%14.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.3%79.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.4%24.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.7%11.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.011.841.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.201.641.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 322 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
78.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.68U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.40hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 78.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 132 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.68 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.8%CMS range 47.9–58.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.1%CMS range 10.2–16.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge78.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge68.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge72.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 4.8–10.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.881.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.01
RN hours/ resident / day
0.86
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.45
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.32
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.61
RN hoursweekends
48.8%
Total nursing turnover
30.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 213 beds and averages 168.9 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.32 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.01 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.447 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.63 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.17 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-31)
21
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

57 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation will have three Deficient Practice Statements (DPS). DPS #1 and DPS #2 pertain to two separate elopements resulting in two Immediate Jeopardies (IJ). Deficient Practice Statement #1 This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00136527 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to respond to audible alarms and instead silenced the alarms, without verifying the source and ensuring that all residents were accounted for, resulting in one resident (Resident #110) eloping from the facility and crawling alongside the perimeter of the facility over grass, pavement and rocks on his hands and knees with the potential for serious harm and/or injury of two residents reviewed for wandering/elopement. Immediate Jeopardy: On 4/18/2023 at 7:20 PM, Resident #110 self-propelled in his wheelchair into the Wheels A/B Unit Atrium and is observed (on camera) standing up from his wheelchair, walking toward the exit door and opening the door at 7:25 PM. His gait was observed to be unsteady as he ambulated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00149011. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to supervise and prevent a fall for one resident (Resident #1) with a history of anticoagulants and falls, of 3 sampled residents, resulting in the lack of meaningful interventions to prevent repeated falls and the lack of ongoing supervision of a resident, who was a known fall risk, resulting in Resident #1 sustaining a fall from wheelchair and suffering a subdural hematoma with hospitalization and death. Findings include: Record review of the facility Assessment: Nursing' policy, dated 6/2021, revealed all residents will receive nursing care based on a documented assessment of individual needs/problems. The purpose is to identify residents' needs at time of admission and throughout hospitalization, to provide individualized care, a written plan of care, implement interventions and positive outcomes, provide monitoring and evaluation of care, and begin the process of discharge planning.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent two residents (Resident's #415 and Resident #75) from developing pressure ulcers, resulting in discomfort/pain, the likelihood for infection, delayed healing, antibiotic usage, and weekly wound care. Findings Include: Resident #415: Review of the Face Sheet, Wound Documentation dated 6/6/24 through 8/6/24, and care plans dated 1/23, revealed Resident #415 was [AGE] years old, admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], alert and his own person and required staff assistance with Activities of Daily Living/ADL's. The resident's diagnosis included, dementia, stroke, muscle weakness, anorexia, malnutrition, chronic pain, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure. The resident developed a pressure ulcer on the right heel while at the facility due to shearing of bedding. Observation was done on 8/6/24 at 6:15 a.m., of Resident #415's right heel pressure ulcer dressing change. The wound care and dressing change was done…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-03-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00143243 and MI00143245. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a comprehensive fall investigation and notification to a physician of X-ray results for one resident (Resident #602), resulting in; 1. Resident #602 falling on 02/26/2024, X-rays being completed on 02/27/2024 with the resident sustaining a nasal bone fracture, left side of maxilla (bone that forms upper jaw) fracture with recommendation for CT (computed tomography) scan; 2. Facility's failure to notify physician of x-ray results and recommendations.; 3. Taking seven days for the facility's physician to review x-ray results and assessing Resident #602 seven days after the fall, after which Resident #602 was again sent to emergency room for evaluation with findings of subacute bilateral subdural hematomas and; 4. Lack of clear and consistent documentation surrounding Resident #602 subdural hematomas. Findings include: Resident #602: On 3/25/2024 at 5:00 PM, an interview was conducted with Nurse H regarding Resident #602's fall on 2/26/2024. Nurse H…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake Number MI00138983. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to institute and operationalize comprehensive monitoring, documentation, assessment, and interventions for three residents (Resident #20, Resident #44, and Resident #313) of three residents reviewed, resulting in a lack of timely assessment, documentation, and treatment of an injury of unknown origin for Resident #20, edema for Resident #44, and Resident #313 experiencing a displaced tibia (large bone in lower leg) fracture, lack of investigation, delayed care, unnecessary pain using the reasonable person concept, and the likelihood for decline in overall health status. Findings include: Resident #20 On 8/22/23 at 11:37 AM, Resident #20 was observed sitting a wheelchair in their room. A dark purple colored bruise was observed over the Resident's right eye. An interview was completed at this time. When asked what happened to their eye, Resident #20 replied, Bumped it in bed. Bilateral upper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent facility- acquired pressure ulcers for one resident (Resident #4), resulting in Resident #4 developing a Stage IV pressure ulcer to the right heel, developed osteomyelitis (inflammation caused by infection), and required an intravenous antibiotic. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Skin Care Protocol for Prevention of Pressure ulcers' policy dated 12/2022 revealed that all residents will be given the necessary care to prevent the development of pressure ulcers. All residents will be assessed for the risk of potential of impaired skin integrity. Record review of the facility 'Pressure Ulcers: Standard of Care for Prevention & Treatment' policy dated 6/2021 revealed a pressure ulcer is defined as any reddened, blistered, or open skin area related to pressure, friction, shear, or maceration of tissue. Pressure ulcer staging guide: Unstageable: Full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to adequate care and treatment for one resident (Resident #101) of 4 residents reviewed, resulting in the resident having received the wrong medications during morning medication administration. Findings include: Record review of the Michigan Ombudsman website https://mltcop.org/know-your-rights, nursing home provider to promote and protect the rights of each resident. Every person requiring nursing home care should be able to enter a nursing home and receive appropriate quality of care, be treated with courtesy, and enjoy continued civil & legal rights. Record review of facility 'Patient/Resident [NAME] of Rights' policy undated revealed the purpose of the resident bill of rights is to communicate to residents their right to be treated with dignity and confirm that their human needs and rights will be respected by all with whom they come in contact with while at the facility. Record review of facility 'Abuse, Neglect,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident #103) of 3 residents reviewed for implementation of care plan interventions (one-one-one for Resident #103), resulting in no one-on-one intervention leading to a resident-to-resident interaction with Resident #106 and scratches incurred by Resident #103. Findings Include: Resident #106:Review of the Face Sheet, and care plans dated 2021, revealed Resident #106 was 82 years-old, admitted to the facility on [DATE]/21, was cognitively impaired with a BIMS of 3 (Cognitive assessment score, 4 being impaired), and required staff assistance with all Activities of Daily Living/ADLs. The resident's diagnoses included, Alzheimer's, Dementia, Parkinson's, Schizophrenia, Bipolar stroke and Agitation.Resident #103:Review of the Face Sheet, and care plans dated 10/25, revealed Resident #103 was 79 years-old, admitted to the facility on [DATE]/21, was cognitively impaired with a BIMS of 3 and required staff assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors for two residents (R101 and R102) of 4 residents reviewed for medication errors, resulting in a staff nurse administering five (5) medications to the wrong resident (R101), which could have resulted in a negative outcome for the resident and for the uncertainty of the other resident (R102) receiving the prescribed doses of medication. Findings include:Record review of the facility 'Medication Administration General Guidelines' policy dated 1/2023 revealed pharmacy will provide medication administration instructions as required to assure medications are administered as prescribed, in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by legally authorized personnel. To assure the safe administration of medications. Procedure: 1.) Nursing will follow nursing policies to administer medications. (none were received when requested for nursing medication administration) 8.) Residents/patients are identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide quality care and services for 4 residents (Resident's #1, #27, #166 and #181) regarding urinary catheter care, applying [NAME] Hose (Resident #1), assessing and monitoring for motorized wheelchair seat belt (Resident #27), assess and treat for a wound/boil (Resident #166), and assess and treat per orders regarding skin integrity (Resident #181), resulting in increased potential for infection, safety concerns regarding safety belt with a motorized wheelchair, increased urinary tract infections and trauma to urinary catheter, safe use of [NAME] Hose, and increased discomfort/pain with possible hospitalization. Findings Include: Resident #1 Review of the Face Sheet, nurses progress notes dated 7/29/25 through 7/31/25, Physician orders dated 2/25 through 7/25, and physician progress note, dated 2/21, revealed Resident #1 was [AGE] years old, confused and unable to make healthcare decisions, dependent on staff for all Activities of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement control measures for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP). This deficient practice has the increased potential to result in water borne pathogens to exist and spread in the facility's plumbing system and an increased risk of respiratory infection among any or all of the residents in the facility. Findings include:Facility [NAME], [NAME] (52634) - Infection Control On 07/29/2025 at 2:00 PM An interview was conducted with the Facility Supervisor K on the Water Management Plan (WMP). When questioned about chlorine residual testing, the Facility Supervisor answered, Saginaw township has tested the chlorine a couple times at least since I've been here and they test monthly or every two weeks. On 07/30/2025 at 10:00 AM An interview was conducted with the Facility Supervisor K on current chlorine residual results. He answered that the results in the water management plan binder were the most…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for two residents (R15, R86) of 5 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in Resident #15 and Resident #86 developing pressure ulcer/injuries while residing in the facility. Record review of the National Institue of Health (NIH) 2022 Pressure Ulcer staging:Stage 2: There is partial-thickness skin loss involving the epidermis and dermis. Stage 3: A full thickness loss of skin extends to the subcutaneous tissue but does not cross the fascia beneath it. Slough or eschar may be visible, and the lesion may be foul-smelling. Stage 4: Full-thickness skin loss extends through the fascia with considerable tissue loss. There may be muscle, bone, tendon, or joint involvement. Record review of the facility-generated CMS-802 Resident Matrix form on 7/29/2025 identified Resident #15 and #86 as 'High risk Pressure Ulcer Stage 2-4'. The facility did not identify 'New or Worsened Pressure Ulcer Stage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess, monitor and document continued seepage and nonadherence for one resident's (Resident #7) ileostomy appliance (Ileostomy is a surgical procedure in which an opening is made in the abdominal wall for stool to leave the body through a stoma. An appliance is worn over the stoma to collect stool) of two residents reviewed for ostomy care. Findings Include: On 7/29/2025 at 4:12 PM, Resident #7 was observed watching television in his room. He had a pleasant demeanor and shared some concerns with this writer. He stated his ileostomy is not adhering and is leaking. The residents' ileostomy site was observed to have leakage that was pooling on his abdomen. When asked when it was last changed, he reported this morning. Resident #7 was uncertain how long it had been leaking but stated it was sore.On 7/29/2025 at approximately 4:35 PM, Nurse DD stated she was informed in report there was an issue with Resident #7's ileostomy bag sealing and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, failed to 1) Ensure hydration fluids were within reach for Resident #13 and 2) Ensure nutrition status monitoring for 2 residents (#7, #10) of 10 residents reviewed for nutrition, resulting in potential for dehydration and thirst for Resident #13, and weight loss not being identified with the potential for further weight loss and decline in overall health and wellbeing. Resident #10: Record review of Resident #10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental status (BIMs) score of 15 out of 15, cognitively intact. Medical diagnosis included hypertension, urinary tract infection, diabetes, hemiplegia, depression, bipolar and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Section K: Swallowing/Nutrition status- noted weight of 183 pounds. Record review of Resident #10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental status (BIMs) score of 15 out of 15, cognitively intact. Medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide enteral tube feeding per nursing standards for one resident (Resident #107) of one resident reviewed for tube feeding, resulting in the infusion of expired solution and improper positioning of the head of the bed with the likelihood of gastrointestinal upset, infection and/or aspiration. Findings include: On [DATE], at 11:09 AM, Resident #107 was resting in their bed. There was a tube feeding pump with a tube feeding solution bag hanging that was dated 7/28 0500 am and was hooked to the resident's abdomen. On [DATE], at 11:12 AM, an observation along with Nurse X of Resident #107's tube feeding solution was conducted. Nurse X was asked what date was on the solution bag and Nurse X stated, the 28th at 5:00 am and actually it should say the 29th. Nurse X was asked to obtain the head of bed angle measurement. On [DATE], at 11:22 AM, Physical Therapist (PT) U entered Resident #107's room. PT U measured the angle of the head of the bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to timely remove a peripheral IV (intravenous) for one resident (#169) of one reviewed for IV access. Findings Include:On 07/29/2025 at approximately 1:13 PM, Resident #169 was observed watching television in his room. The resident was asked what the peripheral IV (intravenous) in his right forearm was being utilized for. The resident stated, They don't use it for anything, it has not been used in over a week. The IV dressing was not dated nor initialed.On 7/29/2025 at approximately 3:10 PM, Nurse Manager T observed Resident #169's peripheral IV and was asked what it was being utilized for. He stated he believed it was for IV hydration. Resident 169's wife was in the room and explained he received IV hydration last week and was supposed to have follow up lab work, but was not certain if that had occurred. Manager T was asked if the dressing should be dated and initialed and he responded, yes. On 7/29/2025 at approximately 4:00 PM, a review was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 41 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the kitchen resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings Include:Facility [NAME], [NAME] (52634) - Kitchen On 7/29/2025 at 9:25AM A kitchen tour was conducted with the Regional Director of Operations I and the General Manager J. On 07/29/2025 at 9:42 AM Record review of the high temp dishwasher log temps had ranges at the rinse temp from 154-193 degrees Fahrenheit. The guidelines for temperature ranges at the top of the document state Rinse 180 degrees Fahrenheit. On 7/29/2025 at 9:45 Observed dishwasher temps at: final temp 184, wash 164, rinse 161, and dual rinse 173 degrees Fahrenheit. On 07/29/2025 at 9:55 AM Observed mixer visibly soiled with residue. In response to the soiled mixer, the Regional Director of Operations I commented Well this looks like it needs to be cleaned. It should be cleaned every day. On 07/29/2025 at 10:05 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number 2564956.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for fall safety prevention for 2 of 5 residents (R21 & R114) reviewed to be at risk for falls, accidents and hazards, by not consistently ensuring the resident's call light was within reach and the fall mat was in place as outlined in the residents' care plans. Facts and Findings include: Resident #21: Review of the Face Sheet, Care Plans dated 4/25, nursing progress notes and Hospice notes dated 7/25, and care guide for Nursing Assistants/CNA’s found in the closet, revealed Resident #21 was [AGE] years old, admitted to the facility on [DATE], confused, unable to follow simple directions, had poor safety awareness with a history of falls in the facility. The resident's diagnoses included, Dementia, behavioral disturbances, cardiac pacemaker, bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety disorder, Alzheimer’s disease, Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), stroke and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake Number MI00149682. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate post fall assistance to one resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for falls, resulting in feelings of sadness and tearfulness. Findings include: Resident #1 (R1): R1 is [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include aphasia, cerebral infarction affecting the right side, anxiety and depression. R1 is non-verbal, however, they can respond to yes/no questions. On 2/7/25 record review of recent falls revealed that R1 sustained an unwitnessed fall on 1/19/25 at 5:50pm. R1 was observed sitting in an upright position on the floor mat next to the bed. On 2/7/25 at 1:01pm, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). LPN 'F' was asked where they were at during the time R1 was observed on the floor. LPN 'F' stated, I was in the room next to the resident. LPN 'F' was asked what alerted them to go into R1's room. LPN 'F' stated, I heard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI000147442 and #MI00147989. The facility failed to ensure professional quality of care regarding timely treatment, transfer to acute care for evaluation and treatment of an infected wound for 1 resident (Resident #104) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in sepsis (severe infection throughout body), hospital admission with treatment for infected pressure ulcer, and antibiotic usage. Findings Include: Resident #104: Review of the Face Sheet, care plans and physician orders dated 5/31/24 through 6/29/24, physician and nursing progress notes dated 5/31/24 through 6/29/24, revealed Resident #104 was 57 years-old, alert with communication deficit due to stroke, admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to acute care for evaluation and treatment of an infected coccyx pressure ulcer. The resident's diagnosis included, diabetes, amputation of right leg below knee, Acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, facial weakness, communication deficit, metabolic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-12 · tag F0574 — widespread
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that previous survey results, State Hotline and Ombudsman contact information were accessible for all residents, resulting in the potential for all residents to be frustrated and/or uninformed of the previous survey results and unsure how and who to complain to. Findings include: On 8/6/24, at 4:00 PM, During Resident Council, group members complained they did not know where the survey results were located. The resident council president reminded the group that the book was in the front lobby and the following complaint was made by members not everyone gets to the lobby. During Resident Council, group members complained they didn't know how to get a hold of the ombudsman and was not sure how to get the state hotline number. The following complaint was made: they were in the hallway, but I think they took them down I know someone in here that has the number On 8/7/24, at 8:45 AM, a measurement of the main corridor hallway from the 500 hallway/nursing unit to the lobby where the survey results binder was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-12 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the daily staff posting was accessible for all residents, resulting in the potential for all residents to be frustrated and/or uninformed of the daily available staff. Findings include: On 8/7/24, at 8:45 AM, a measurement of the main corridor hallway from the 500 hallway/nursing unit to the lobby where the staff posting was located revealed .11 miles/580 feet. On 8/07/24, at 9:43 AM, an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted regarding the posting of the daily staff. The DON stated the staff posting was at the front desk. The DON was asked if the staff posting at the front desk was for the entire building and the DON stated, yes. The DON was asked for clarification if each of the nursing units had their own staff posting and the DON stated, no. On 8/08/24, at 2:05 PM, Central Staffing (CF) Z was interviewed regarding the staff posting and CF Z stated, they fill it out and email it to the switchboard operator each day. On 8/08/24, at 2:07 PM, a record review of the staff posting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility 1) Failed to ensure that the Arbor Cafe's refrigerator was clean and sanitary, and 2) Failed to ensure a clean and sanitized kitchen for a census of 162 residents who eat from the kitchen, resulting in the likelihood for resident illness from cross contamination, unsafe food items and weight loss. Findings Include: On 8/05/24 at 9:15 a.m., during the initial kitchen tour accompanied by Chef F and VP of Dietary G, the following observations were made: -At 9:43 a.m., a large trash bin with trash up to the top was found sitting next to the grill, with no lid on it. -At 9:44 a.m., the microwave was found to have dried food particles on the inside top, sides and door. -At 9:45 a.m., the large can opener had dried food on it and the paint was chipping off the blade. -At 9:46 a.m., a clean and ready for use silver metal pan was stacked inside another pan and it was found to be wet inside. -At 9:47 a.m., in the backing area several staff members were making cookies and the large trash bin that was sitting directly behind the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean and safe environment for 3 Units (Wheel's, Patriot, and Garden) of 4 units observed and failed to ensure that one resident's refrigerator (room [ROOM NUMBER]) was clean and all food items were dated, resulting in the likelihood for cross contamination, resident illnesses, cluttered resident rooms, and an unsafe environment. Findings Include: Environmental tour done on 8/7/24 starting at 10:28 a.m., accompanied by the Director of Nursing/DON, Director of Maintenance C, and the Director of Housekeeping A. During the tour, the following concerns were found: On Wheels Neighborhood starting at 10:30 a.m.: -In room [ROOM NUMBER], the CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) was sitting on the nightstand, not in the clear plastic bag next to the CPAP machine. The CPAP and tubing were also found to be dirty. Review of the facility CPAP policy (dated February 2023) revealed the CPAP should be cleaned and disinfected by staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00143547 and MI00144442. Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility 1) Failed to ensure that privacy was maintained for one resident (Resident #56), 2) Failed to ensure that residents are receiving timely, polite, and dignified assistance, 3) Failed to ensure that female residents with facial hair were shaven, 4) Failed to ensure that call lights are within reach, and 5) Failed to respond timely to call lights for nine residents (#6, #11, #12, #26, #28, #56, #78, #135, and #136) and the Confidential Resident Group meeting conducted on 08/06/24, resulting in verbalizations of concern and anger, an unsafe environment, and the likelihood for decreased self-esteem, shame and isolation. Findings Include: Resident #6: Review of the Face Sheet and care plans, revealed Resident #6 was [AGE] years old, admitted to the facility on [DATE], alert and able to make own healthcare decisions, and dependent on staff for assistance with Activities of Daily Living…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that grievances were followed up timely and ensure that all residents were invited to the Resident Council meeting for a confidential group of residents, resulting in feelings of being left out, frustration, crying, continued complaints of staff being loud, rude, slow and disrespectful call light responses. Findings include: On 8/6/24, at 4:00 PM, during Resident Council, the group complained that the facility doesn't follow up on their complaints. The group complained that they often complain about loud staff in the hallways and nothing has changed at all or nothing gets done about it. They also complained that the staff continue to answer their call lights rudely and say what do you want; don't answer them timely and/or cancel them and don't come back. The following complaints were voiced: they will come in a grab my tray, but leave me in my mess (referring to bowel movement) They will tell you to start going and will help you, but they don't They say I have to go to bed now because they're short…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable and home like environment to ensure that residents' rooms, dining rooms and other facility areas were 1) Clean, uncluttered and in good repair including Rooms 383, 422 and 449; 2) Without pests; 3) Cleaning supplies were stored properly; and 4) A Confidential group of residents received proper silverware, resulting in an unclean and non-homelike physical environment, resident dissatisfaction and complaints. Findings Include: FACILITY Environment On 8/5/2024 at 9:58 AM, during a tour of the building room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have a yellow, urine-soaked wash rag, laid out flat on the floor in front of the toilet. The room smelled strongly of urine. On 8/05/2024 at 2:40 PM, during a tour of the facility large bags of clothes were observed in a laundry basked under the sink in the bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER]. There was also a plastic storage container next to the toilet. Unit Manager JJ was interviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for five dependent residents (Resident #59, Resident #60, Resident #62, Resident #117 and Resident #135) of eight residents reviewed for ADL's resulting in long, dirty fingernails, female residents having facial hair, lack of assistance with oral care and timely assistance with toileting. Findings include: Resident #135 (R135): Resident #135 is [AGE] years old, non-verbal and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include dementia, aphasia, depression and cognitive communication deficit. On 08/06/24 at 11:18 AM, R135 was observed sitting in the dining room on the 500 unit, R135 was observed to have facial hair on the chin and upper lip and dirty nails. On 08/07/24 at 10:40 AM, R135 was observed during an activity and noted to still have facial hair and dirty nails. On 08/07/24 at 10:43 AM, an interview was conducted with Activity Aide O. Activity Aide O was asked who is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents' food preferences were honored for four residents (Resident #23, Resident #26, Resident #42, and Resident #79) of 7 residents reviewed for food and nutrition, resulting in residents' feelings of anger, frustration and dissatisfaction with the meal experience, which could lead to decreased nutritional intake and weight loss. Findings Include: Resident #23: Food A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: history of a stroke, left sided weakness, GERD, depression weakness, epilepsy and hypertension. The Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had mild cognitive deficit with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12/15 and the resident needed assistance with all care. On 8/05/2024 at 1:39 PM, during an interview with Resident #23, she said she was upset because she did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-12 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide snacks, including bedtime snacks, for a confidential group of residents, resulting in complaints of the unit refrigerators being empty of snacks, no availability for snacks, no personal choice of snacks, familiy and friends having to purchase snacks with the feelings of frustration, sadness and hunger. Findings include: On 8/6/24, at 4:00 PM, During Resident Council Task, all attendees complained of not getting snacks. The following complaints were voiced: Being a diabetic, you'd think you'd get healthy snacks like apple sauce, peanut butter and jellies, fruit or cheese our family has to bring us snacks you have to ask every afternoon with us being diabetic, they should give a snack for us at bedtime I save my chips from dinner so I have a bedtime snack my son brings me snacks I don't eat all my chips at dinner and save half the bag for nighttime I have my family bring me snacks my family brings me in fresh fruit because they don't give us any we only get 1 banana for breakfast on Sundays it would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00143547. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Infection Prevention and Control standards of practice were followed for 1) Personal Protection Equipment/PPE use, 2) Hand Hygiene for Residents #56 and #143 and 3) Linen transport for a census of 162 residents, resulting in the potential for the spread of infection. Findings Include: On 8/05/24, at 1:35 PM, the in-room sanitizer for room [ROOM NUMBER] was not working. Resident #56: On 8/07/24, at 8:55 AM, an observation of Resident #56's incontinence care along with CENA X was conducted. CENA X had gloves on and assisted the resident with perineal care and placed a new incontinent brief on the resident. Resident #56 asked for a drink and CENA X picked up the bedside cup with their gloved hand and offered the bedside cup to the resident. CENA X did not remove their dirty gloves and perform hand hygiene prior to assisting with the fluids. On 8/05/24, at 2:08 PM, an observation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASARR) Level II completed by Community Mental Health with recommendations for specialized mental health services was incorporated into the residents' plan of care for two residents (Resident #26 and Resident #59) of 2 residents reviewed for PASARR, resulting in the potential for absence of available services for mental health disorders . Findings Include: Resident #26: PASARR A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Guillain-Barre syndrome, quadriplegia dysphagia, bipolar disorder, pneumonia, pain, depression, and hypertension. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had full cognitive abilities with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15; the resident had functional limitations in bilateral upper and lower extremities and the needed assistance with all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update/revise individualized, person-centered care plans to reflect changing care needs for three residents (Resident #12, Resident #16, and Resident #117), of 32 residents reviewed for care plans, resulting in the potential for unmet care needs. Findings Include Resident #16: Pressure Ulcer/Injury A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and the most recent readmission of 4/16/2024 with diagnoses: History of brain injury, quadriplegia, seizures, hydrocephalus, dysphagia, multiple pressure ulcers, and anxiety. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive decline and was dependent with all care. On 8/06/24 at 9:53 AM, Resident #16 was observed lying in bed. He had an air mattress set at 400 normal pressure; on the static setting. The resident was awake and alert, but unable to answer questions. On 8/08/24 at 12:28 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00143547. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to monitor and treat blood glucose levels for one resident (Resident #165) of five residents reviewed for medication management, resulting in Resident #165 developing a change of condition due to low blood glucose levels and being transferred to the hospital. Findings Include: Resident #165: Hospitalization A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident #165 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Diabetes, end stage kidney disease, renal dialysis, Alzheimer's disease, GERD, COPD, hypothyroidism, and hypertension. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had full cognitive abilities with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15 and needed assistance with all care. On 8/07/24 at 2:00 PM, during an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON BB related to a facility reported incident for Resident #165, she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that management and monitoring of a left arm splint was provided for one resident (Resident #78), of 1 resident reviewed for splint use, resulting in Resident #78 having a soiled hand splint, that had not been laundered. Findings Include: Resident #78: Position, Mobility A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident #78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: Dementia, history of a stroke, diabetes, depression, weakness, COPD, obesity, pain, seizure disorder, dysphagia and left sided weakness. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #78 had full cognitive abilities with a BIMS score of 15/15 and needed assistance with all care. On 8/05/24 at 1:28 PM, Resident #78 was observed sitting in a chair in his room. He showed his left-hand splint sitting on top of a table. The splint had a cream-colored soft material on the inside and was very soiled, brown. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety for one resident (Resident #12) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents and falls, resulting in a left eyebrow laceration, pain and the likelihood of further injury. Findings include: Resident #12: On 8/6/24, at 1:00 PM, a record review of Resident #12's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia, Parkinson's Disease and Alzheimer's. Resident #12 had severely impaired cognition and required assistance with all Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). A record review of the Problem Start Date: 11/24/2022 Category: ADL's Functional Status . (the resident) is limited in ability to perform ADL's/hygiene/transfers related to: Dementia; Parkinson's . Approach Start Date: 01/09/2024 Staff to use 2 assist with ADL's and hygiene when resident is exhibiting behaviors to help decrease risk for injury as needed . A review of the Problem Start Date: 07/22/2024 (the resident) has periods of swinging at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to document food acceptance, provide suitable utensils, and assess, monitor and notify the physician of a weight loss for one resident (Resident #143) of three residents reviewed for nutrition, resulting in a significant weight loss and numerous undocumented meal consumptions. Findings include: Resident #143: On 8/06/24, at 9:08 AM, Resident #143 was sitting in bed. Their breakfast tray was on the overbed table and appeared untouched. There was 2 slices of bacon and pile of scrambled eggs. There was a medal fork, a plastic spoon and a plastic knife. There was no staff assistance. Resident #143 was asked if they needed help or could take a bite of eggs on their own. Resident #143 picked up the fork with a shaky hand and forked a bite of eggs. Resident #143 used their right hand with the fork and with their left hand pushed the fork of eggs into their mouth. It took the resident 2 full minutes to get a bite of eggs and chew it. The resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that oxygen equipment for two residents (Resident #2 and Resident #60) and one continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) mask and tubing for one resident (Resident #624) were clean, sanitized and stored properly after use of 4 residents reviewed for oxygen and CPAP equipment, resulting in the likelihood for cross contamination, respiratory illnesses/disease and increased antibiotic usage. Findings Include: Resident #624: Review of the Face Sheet, physician orders and care plans dated 8/2/24, revealed Resident #624 was [AGE] years old, admitted to the facility on [DATE], was alert and required staff assistance with Activities of Daily Living. The resident's diagnosis included fracture of left lower leg, fall, degenerative disease of nervous system, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, sleep apnea and heart disease. During the environmental observation done on 8/7/24 at 10:00 a.m., Resident #624's CPAP was sitting out on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess and monitor the dialysis port for one resident (Resident #54) of one resident reviewed for dialysis resulting in the resident starting on antibiotics. Findings include: Resident #54 (R54): Resident #54 is [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include end stage renal disease, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, heart failure and dependence on renal dialysis. On 08/07/24 at 02:23 PM, R54 was observed in their room, a dressing was noted on the upper right chest area where the dialysis port is located. On 08/07/24 at 02:24 PM, an interview was conducted with R54. R54 states they go to dialysis on Monday, Wednesday and Friday. R54 stated they were a bit tired after dialysis today but overall feeling good. On 08/07/24 at 02:29 PM, record review revealed there was no physician order to assess and monitor the dialysis port for any changes. On 08/08/24 at 10:46 AM, an interview was conducted with R54. R54…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 3 of 8 medication carts were free of crushed pills, pieces of loose paper, silver shards of foil from medication cartridges and dust on the bottom of the drawers, and one set-up of a resident's medications (room [ROOM NUMBER]) in a medication cup, resulting in the likelihood for cross contamination, low medications count with increased cost and missed resident medications. Findings Include: During observation of Patriot units cart 2 of 300 hall medication cart done on 8/5/24 at 1:43 p.m., accompanied by Nurse, RN I, revealed the second, third and fourth drawers were found to have crushed white pills, pieces of paper and dust on the bottoms of the drawers. During an interview done on 8/5/24 at 1:45 p.m., Nurse I stated I just cleaned this out last week, I am not sure who cleans the carts. During a second observation of Patriot units cart 1 of 300 hall medication cart done on 8/5/24 at 2:36 p.m., accompanied by Nurse, LPN J, revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that antibiotic orders identified the reason for use and antibiotic use was tracked for two residents (Resident #23 and Resident #79) of 3 residents reviewed for antibiotic use, resulting in the potential for inappropriate antibiotic use that could contribute to adverse effects, antibiotic resistance and the spread of infection. Findings Include: FACILITY Infection Control Resident #23: A record review of the Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: history of a stroke, left sided weakness, GERD, depression weakness, epilepsy and hypertension. The Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had mild cognitive deficit with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12/15 and the resident needed assistance with all care. A review of the physician orders for Resident #23 indicated the resident had an order for Doxycycline (an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-24 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the local ombudsman's office of a discharge for one resident (Resident #159), resulting in the lack communication to the local ombudsman office. Findings include: Resident #159: On 8/23/23, at 3:24 PM, the Administrator was asked to provide the discharge notification to the local ombudsman for Resident #159. On 8/24/23, at 9:20 AM, the Administrator was again asked for the discharge notification to the local ombudsman for Resident #159. On 8/24/23, at 10:30 AM, the Administrator was again asked for discharge notification to the ombudsman. The Administrator offered that's not anything they have ever done and that they placed a phone call to their local ombudsman for clarification. On 8/24/23, at 2:06 PM, the Administrator forwarded the email conversation with the local ombudsman office which revealed the following: (the facility) is currently going through annual survey. They would like to exit today and need to have all needed information by 2 PM. I have been the CEO but have just started as the NHA on August 3rd…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) maintain food preparation and kitchen equipment in a sanitary and good working condition, and 2) ensure kitchen freezer door were properly maintained, resulting in an increased likelihood for food borne illness with hospitalization, and cross contamination affecting 151 residents who consumed oral nutrition from the facility kitchen of a total census of 165 residents. Findings Include: During the initial kitchen tour done on 8/22/23 at 11:00 a.m., accompanied by Dietary Manager/Chef U, the following observations were made: -At 11:00 a.m., a plastic cup with liquid in it was found in cooler #8; no name or date on it (it was a staff member drink). -At 11:04 a.m., the resident microwave was observed to have dried on food and drips inside on top and sides, and on the door. There were an excessive amount of crumbs found under the microwave. -At 11:05 a.m., the clean and ready for use Robot Coupe had the top on it and was found to be wet inside. Moisture in a covered container increases bacterial growth. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize a comprehensive Infection Control (IC) program including outcome and process surveillance, data analysis and reporting, hand hygiene performance, environmental and equipment cleaning/sanitization processes/procedures for all 165 facility Residents resulting in lack of PPE use for a resident diagnosed with Clostridioides difficile (C-diff- contagious gram positive, spore-forming, anaerobic bacillus which causes severe diarrhea), lack of cleaning/sanitization of shared blood glucometers, cross contamination from exposed, bloody towels on the floor, lack of surveillance for potential infections, lack of consistent documentation and utilization of McGeer Criteria, incomplete infection analysis, and the likelihood for the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for all residents. Findings Include: On 8/22/23 at 2:00 PM and 8/24/23 at 8:31 AM, the hand sanitizer dispenser near room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #73: Record review of Resident #73's electronic medical record revealed that the resident was receiving hospice services and was care planned to encourage the resident to verbalize feelings and concerns. Resident #73 requires hospice and was care planned to experience death with dignity and comfort. An interview on 08/22/23 at 10:42 AM with Resident #73 revealed the call light takes a long time, and when the girls come in, they talk over the top of me, and they complain about their job, and I have to tell them that they are here to work on me and not to get so rough. Resident #82: Record review of Resident #82's electronic medical record revealed that the resident was care planned for on 10/21/2020 for behavioral symptoms of: (Resident name) has periods of refusing care due to (resident name) believing she is able to do it on her own which is a safety concern. Interventions included: Convey an attitude of acceptance toward the resident and explain the need for assistance from staff for her safety.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer oxygen per orders, and store respiratory equipment in a sanitary and proper manner for six residents (#9, #65, #82, #88, #101, #130), resulting in the likelihood for cross contamination, increased risk for respiratory infections and prolonged illness. Findings include: Record review of facility 'Oxygen Delivery Systems' policy dated 6/2022 revealed all oxygen delivery systems shall be set up in a uniform manner with proper procedure to provide an adequate delivery of oxygen to the patient/resident. The purpose was to allow patient/resident to receive the maximum benefits of oxygen therapy. Resident #82: Record review of Resident #82's care plan of Alteration in breathing related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) revealed on 4/26/2023 intervention: Suction as needed. Observation on 08/22/23 at 10:42 AM of Resident #82's room revealed a Suction machine on the floor. Oral [NAME] for oral suction noted to be laying on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-24 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures for use, assessment, and ongoing evaluation of bed rails for 164 of 165 Residents reviewed resulting in lack of consent for use, identification and implementation of alterative interventions, lack of entrapment assessment, maintenance and monitoring of side rails, extremely loose and moveable rails, and the likelihood for injury. Findings include: An initial tour of the Wheels unit of the facility was completed on 8/22/23 beginning at 10:14 AM. During the tour, all 33 Residents residing on the unit were noted to have various types of bed/side rails in place on their beds. Rails were also observed on unoccupied, made beds in resident rooms. Resident #20: On 8/22/23 at 11:37 AM, Resident #20 was observed sitting a wheelchair in their room. A dark purple colored bruise was observed over the Resident's right eye. An interview was completed at this time. When asked what happened to their eye,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to issue a beneficiary notice (ABN/Nomnic) for Resident #4 and notify an eligible resident in writing of the items and services which are or are not covered under Medicaid or by the facility's per diem rate, including the cost of those items and services: resulting in the likelihood for financial hardship. Findings include: Record review of the facility 'Administrative Manual- Utilization Management Beneficiary Notification Procedure P-006' dated 1/2014 revealed that the Utilization Management and/or the Neighborhood Registered Nurse Manager shall be responsible for the notifying beneficiary and/or responsible party and attending physician in writing of benefit status. To ensure beneficiary and/or responsible party of notification of status as required by insurance carriers. Procedure: Written notification on non-covered care shall be issued to competent resident or responsible party: (a.) Prior to termination of coverage. (b.) Following notification by intermediary or insurance carrier. (c.) If inpatient stay…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate medical justification and ongoing evaluation and assessment of physical restraint use for one resident (Resident #313) of one resident reviewed, resulting in a lack of comprehensive reevaluation of necessity following readmission, physical restraint use per family request for fall prevention and positioning, lack of attempts of alternative interventions, lack of reevaluation and implementation of less restrictive devices, and the likelihood for injury and psychosocial distress using the reasonable person concept. Findings include: On 8/23/23 at 8:40 AM, Resident #313 was observed in the central activity room area of the unit alone sitting in their wheelchair. The Resident's wheelchair was positioned against the table. The Resident was holding a cardboard container of chocolate milk. An unopened container of apple juice and an open applesauce with no spoon was sitting in the table in front of them. Bilateral (left and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a discharge summary was created and provided for one resident (Resident #159) of one resident reviewed for discharge, resulting in the admitting hospital not having an updated plan of care and unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #159: On 8/23/23, at 12:33 PM, a record of Resident #159's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on 7/27/23. A review of the discharge summary screen revealed no discharge summary. On 8/23/23, at 1:27 PM, a record review along with unit manager G was conducted of Resident #159's electronic medical record. UM G was asked where the discharge summary would be located and UM G stated, under the discharge summary tab. A review of the discharge summary tab revealed no discharge summary. A further review of the miscellaneous documents tab revealed no discharge summary. On 8/23/23, at 3:15 PM, Nurse M was asked if there was any other document the facility could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the PASAAR and Level II OBRA evaluation was completed timely for one resident (Resident #313) of one resident reviewed for PASAAR, resulting in the likelihood of unmet needs and no communication with the local community OBRA coordinator. Findings include: Resident #313: On 8/24/23, at 12:05 PM, a record review of Resident #313's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke, attention and concentration deficit and mental illness. A review of the most recent PAS/AAR From Date 01/15/2021 revealed SECTION II - Screening criteria . 1. The person has a current diagnosis of . the YES box was check and MENTAL ILLNESS was circled. 2. The person has received treatment for . the YES box was checked and MENTAL ILLNESS was circled.Explain and YES . Note: The person screened shall be determined to require a comprehensive Level II OBRA evaluation if any of the above items are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) ensure urinary catheter tubing was off the floor and not dragging underneath a wheelchair, and 2) use an appropriate technique with the emptying of a urinary catheter bag, 3) ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) were done daily, and 4) maintain privacy by placing a urinary catheter bag in a privacy bag for 1 resident (Resident's #143), of 3 residents reviewed for urinary catheter, resulting in the high likelihood for cross contamination and urinary tract infection, embarrassment with possible dislodging of a urinary catheter. Findings Include: Resident #143: Review of the facility face sheet, minimum data set (resident assessment tool dated 2/23/23), and care plans dated 8/23, revealed Resident #149 was 78 years-old, admitted to the facility on [DATE], very confused, non-ambulatory, and dependent on staff for all ADL's. The resident had recently had a suprapubic catheter put in (directly into the bladder on the abdomen). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage for one of four medication carts reviewed, resulting in the storage of a pre-drawn medication syringes with cloudy insulin with the likelihood of missed insulin. Findings include: On 8/22/23, at 9:46 AM, medication storage task was conducted with Nurse EE of the Garden unit Med Cart 2. Nurse EE opened up drawer 3 of the cart which revealed a syringe of fluid in an insulin syringe placed loosely on the bottom of a drawer. There was an alcohol prep pad located near the syringe. The syringe had 10 units of liquid and appeared cloudy and grey. There was no name on the syringe. Nurse EE picked up the syringe for observation and stated, I did not do that and that is not mine. Nurse EE was asked what they thought the liquid was and Nurse EE stated, it looks like regular insulin but its cloudy. Nurse EE discarded the insulin syringe with the 10 units of liquid into the sharps container on their medication cart. On 8/23/23, at 5:20 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked if the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Medical Director was present at least quarterly at the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meetings, resulting in the likelihood of the Medical Director not being made aware of quality concerns throughout the facility. Findings include: On 8/24/23, at 8:51 AM, QAPI task was conducted with Nurse M A record review of the QAPI sign in sheets from 5/2022 to 9/2023 revealed no Medical Director (MD) signature for the months of 5/2022, 6/2022, 7/2022 . and the . QUALITY MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE sign in sheet for August 2022 listed names under Present: . The MD's name was not listed on the August 2022 sign in sheet. The record review of the QAPI sign in sheets continued with Nurse which revealed no QAPI sign in sheet for December, 2022 and no MD signature for the months of 1/2023, 2/2023. Nurse M was asked why the Medical Director was not signed in for the months of May through August, 2022 and Nurse MM stated, I don't know and that the MD is usually there.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) education hours for two of two CNA's reviewed during staffing task, resulting in the lack of the required 12 hour education hours. Findings include: On 8/23/23, at 09:38 AM, A record review of CNA GG Relias Transcript for education hours along with Organizational Executive (OE) JJ revealed that CNA GGhad only 6.05 hours of education since 1/1/2022 through 8/24/2023. OE JJ stated, well you really can't' go by that and offered that the CNA's do other education. OE JJ was asked to provide all education the CNA's were offered. A review of CNA HH Relias education hours from 1/1/2022 through 8/4/2023 revealed 6.72 hours of education. OE HH offered that the CNA's also do mandatory training comp stomp which was listed in the Relias training. A further review of CNA's HH revealed cna comp stomp 2022 10/24/2022 was listed. Under the column for Hours revealed Met. The Mandatory Packet-Nursing revealed Hours 2.00. OE HH was asked to provide the detailed education offered for the comp stomp and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00138575. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of the elopement of one resident (Resident #101) to the State Agency (SA) in accordance with Section 1150B of the Act, resulting in the potential for other residents to elope and risk being stuck by a vehicle, falling into a large ditch, and the potential for serious harm, injury, and/or death. Findings Include: On 8/9/23 at approximately 1:30 PM, Nurse Managers G and H, were queried if there were any other resident elopements at their facility since April 2023. They shared that Resident #101 eloped from the facility a few weeks ago and that the DON (Director of Nursing) completed an investigation. The DON provided the facility internal investigation from Resident #101 eloping from the facility. The DON stated at 7:00 PM on 7/25/2023, Resident #101 walked out his room and past the front receptionist out the South entrance of the facility. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00137221. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to schedule a CT Scan in a timely manner for one resident (Resident #103), resulting in Resident #103 being transferred to another facility on 07/27/2023 without a scheduled CT Scan appointment as his Neurosurgeon requested. Findings Include: On 8/10/2023 at 9:50 PM, an interview was conducted with Nurse Manager F regarding Resident #103's CT Scan. Manager F explained they encountered issues scheduling his CT scan as they were informed it required an insurance preauthorization. When they called the insurance company, they had issues reaching a representative and they required certain identification number that Manager F did not have. Once they gathered all the necessary information, they were informed by the representative that Resident #103 did not require a preauthorization for the CT scan. This was discovered some days before his discharge to another facility and Manager F informed their HUC (Health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$208,810 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $98,020 — penalty dated 2024-12-04
  • $62,904 — penalty dated 2024-08-12
  • $47,886 — penalty dated 2024-03-27
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-02-13 for 17 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
AKBAR, WAHEEDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2016
COUGHLIN, JENEANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
FORBES, JAMIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
GOMEZ, MIGUELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2011
KRAFFT, DENNISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
MCGRAW, KATHLEENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
NOVAK, TIMOTHYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2009
SPITZER, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
TANY, JACKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
WELLMAN, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2007
MARTINEZ, SONJAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/15/2025
ROHR, CHRISTINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/15/2025
SWINSON, ERICIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/15/2025
TREVILLIAN, MICHELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/15/2025
WILLIAMS, MARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/15/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235150. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next