Evangelical Home - Saline
440 W Russell, Saline, MI 48176 · Non profit - Church related · 143 certified beds · (734) 429-9401 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.6% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.9% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 4.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.3% | 3.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.8% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.9% | 19.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.1% | 5.1% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 29.2% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.8% | 14.8% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.2% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.3% | 79.5% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 33.4% | 24.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.0% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.31 | 1.84 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.59 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
66.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 457 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 45.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 200 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 66.0%CMS range 61.1–70.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 9.0–13.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 45.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 42.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 37.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.6% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.2%CMS range 3.5–8.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.72 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 143 beds and averages 104.4 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.83 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with dignity and respect for one resident (R1) of three residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed R1 was admitted into the facility on 2/16/26 with diagnoses that included: lymphedema, morbid obesity, chronic pain, and age-related osteoporosis without current pathological fracture. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R1 scored 15/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam (which indicated intact cognition).On 6/10/26 at approximately 12:45 PM, during an interview with R1, when asked about therapy services, it was reported that is a sore spot with me and described an interaction with Physical Therapist (PT) J where he told her that she didn't want to stand, he became upset with her and told her she just wanted someone to blame for not being able to stand. R1 reported that this upset her and that she had notified the facilities administrator via email…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to notify resident representative of a change of condition, in a timely manner for one resident (R3) of three reviewed. Findings include:This citation pertains to intake 3022365.Review of the clinical record revealed R3 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: olecranon bursitis-right elbow (inflammation of the fluid-filled sac at the tip of the elbow), encounter for surgical aftercare and need for assistance with personal care. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R3 scored 13/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam (which indicated intact cognition). On [DATE] 2:26 PM, during a telephone interview with Family Member (FM) I, it was reported that her father had passed on 5/20, after experiencing a change of condition (low blood pressure) around 11pm on 5/19. FM 'I reported not being called when R3 began to decline and was not notified of his passing until after the body had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain food service equipment affecting 108 residents who consume food, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination and bacterial harborage.Findings include:On 01/27/2026 at 10:25 A.M., An initial tour of the food service was conducted with Director of Dining Services S. The following items were noted:Two 16-inch fry pans were observed (etched, scored, particulate). One of two 16-inch fry pans were also observed out-of-round.Four 8-inch non-stick fry pans were observed (etched, scored, particulate). An interview was conducted with Director of Dining Services S regarding employment longevity. Director of Dining Services S stated: I have only been here since November 17th.The 2022 FDA Model Food Code section 4-501.11 states: (A) EQUIPMENT shall be maintained in a state of repair and condition that meets the requirements specified under Parts 4-1 and 4-2. (B) EQUIPMENT components such as doors, seals, hinges, fasteners, and kick plates shall be kept intact, tight, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain the physical plant affecting 108 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination and bacterial harborage.Findings include:On 01/27/2026 at 3:50 P.M., An environmental tour of the facility Laundry Service was conducted with Environmental Service Manager V. The following items were noted:Clean Laundry Room: The flooring surface was observed (etched, scored, particulate). The flooring surface measured approximately 22-feet-wide by 24-feet-long. Environmental Services Manager V stated: I will enter a maintenance request into WorxHub.Soiled Laundry Room: The flooring surface was observed with black electrical tape adhered to the surface. The black electrical tape measured approximately 4-inches-wide by 60-inches-long. The flooring surface wall/floor junctures and entrance door frames were further observed soiled with accumulated and encrusted dust/dirt deposits.On 01/28/2026 at 10:40…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise care plans and maintain accurate care plans for six (R2, R5, R32, R56, R91, and R101) of 22 reviewed. Findings include:Findings Include Resident #56 (R56) Review of the medical record reflected that R56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting the right dominate side, Dysarthria following Cerebral Infarction, Expressive language disorder, major depression, Hearing loss bilateral and chronic instability of right knee. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) revealed R56 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 (Cognitively intact) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R56 was 1 to 2 people for personal care. During observation and interview on 01/27/2026 at 3:58 PM, R56 was sitting in her wheelchair staring at her TV. R56 had her over the bed table beside her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to preserve the dignity of two residents (resident #78 and resident # 86) of three residents reviewed. Findings include: Findings Include Resident # 78 (R78) Review of the medical record reflected that R78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of Friedreich Ataxia, Dysphagia, Spinal Stenosis Cervical Region, Major Depression, Anxiety, Sensorineural Hearing Loss Bilateral, Expressive Language Disorder, irritability and anger. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) revealed R78 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (Cognitively intact) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R78 was dependent of all personal care. During an interview on 01/27/2026 at 11:03, R78 stated they do treat her with respect and dignity, and some don't. R78 stated she had reported it, but nothing is done. R78 stated she had been there a long time and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During an interview and observation, the facility failed to maintain privacy and confidential records for one resident (R#135) of one resident investigated.Findings IncludeResident #135 (R135)Review of the medical record reflected that R135 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of Cellulitis of Face, weakness, Chronic Kidney Disease, Muscle weakness and history of falls.The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) was still being completed due to new admission and data was not available.During an observation and interview on 01/28/2026 at 7:20 AM, phlebotomist W was in the resident's room finishing a lab draw and writer noticed R135's personal health information laying open on the top of the lab draw cart outside of the resident's room. This information was visible to anyone walking by the cart and resident's room, which was not met for the public eye. This writer read the residents' name, date of birth , diagnosis, physician orders, and labs being drawn at this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide impactful and meaningful activities for four of four residents reviewed (Resident #'s 32, 56,86 and 101).Findings include: Resident # 32 (R32) Review of the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference (ARD) date of 11/15/25 revealed Resident #32 (R32) was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses epilepsy and delayed psychological development. R32 scored 5 out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). On 01/27/2026 11:05 AM R32 observed in her room sitting up in bed wearing a gown. The room was dark, no television was on, no radio, no books, puzzles or any type of leisure activity observed in room/bedside. Upon approach R32 was engaged in conversation easily and was very, friendly. On 01/28/2026 at 12:15 PM, R32 was observed sitting up in bed, no television, no radio on, no books or other type of leisure activity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (R72, R101) of four residents reviewed received care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice and the care plan. Findings include: Resident #101 (R101) Review of the medical record reflected that R101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of Chronic Respiratory Failure, Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease, Depression, Anxiety and Chronic Pain. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) revealed R101 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 (Cognitively intact) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R101 was dependent of all personal care. During an interview on 01/28/2026 at 9:08 AM, R101 stated he did not get any range of motion (ROM) or repositioning like he is supposed to be getting. R101 added he cannot reposition himself, so the staff know they had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide ROM and repositioning to one resident (Resident #101) of two residents interviewed for ROM and mobility. Findings Include:Resident 101 (R101)Review of the medical record reflected that R101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses of Chronic Respiratory Failure, Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease, Depression, Anxiety and Chronic Pain.The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) revealed R101 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 (Cognitively intact) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R101 was dependent of all personal care.During an interview on 01/28/2026 at 9:08 AM, R101 stated he did not get any range of motion (ROM) or repositioning like he is supposed to be getting. R101 added he cannot reposition himself, so the staff know they had to do it. During an interview on 01/29/2026 at 7:39 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent falls for one (R5) of two reviewed. Findings include:Review of the medical record reflected R5 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included vascular dementia, unspecified fracture of lower end of right femur (9/3/25), periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic right knee joint (9/3/25) and Alzheimer's. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/16/25, reflected R5 scored three out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 01/28/2026 at 11:39 AM, R5 was observed lying awake, in bed. The bed height was noted to be in a low position. An over-bed table was located at the left bedside. R5 was noted to be barefoot on the right foot. Their left foot was beneath the bed linens and unable to be observed. On 01/29/2026 at 11:28 AM, R5 was observed lying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and 2 (#72, #132) of 22 sampled residents, the facility failed to provide palatable food products affecting 108 residents who consume food, resulting in the increased likelihood for resident decreased food acceptance and nutritional decline.Findings include:On 01/27/2026 at 11:53 A.M., An interview was conducted with Director of Dining Services S regarding the resident food tray delivery schedule. Director of Dining Services S stated: Main Dining Room, C-Wing, D-Wing, B-Wing, East Hall, South Hall, and North Hall. On 01/27/2026 at 11:55 A.M., Lunch meal food trays (19) were observed leaving the food production kitchen, within an insulated food transport cart. On 01/27/2026 at 11:58 A.M., Lunch meal food trays (19) were observed arriving to C-Wing, within an insulated food transport cart. On 01/27/2026 at 12:09 P.M., Lunch meal food trays (23) were observed leaving the food production kitchen, within an insulated food transport cart. On 01/27/2026 at 12:12 P.M.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer influenza and pneumococcal immunizations per consent for one (R6) of five reviewed.Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pleural effusion, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, and pneumonia.Review of the Consent to Administer Pneumonia Vaccination and the Consent to Administer Influenza Vaccination revealed R6 declined both vaccinations. R6 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R6's Consent to Administer Pneumonia Vaccination and the Consent to Administer Influenza Vaccination revealed R6 consented and wished to receive both vaccinations upon readmission to the facility. Review of the medical record revealed R6 did not receive either vaccination.Review of the Health Status Note dated 1/10/26 revealed R6's chest x-ray results…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake number MI00150684. Based on observation, interview, and record the facility failed to document one out of three resident's (Resident #3) condition per professional standards of practice, resulting in the potential for a delay in treatment. Findings Included: On 3/11/2025 at 2:50 PM, Resident #3 (R3) was observed in her room lying in bed. R3 stated she that about three weeks ago she had a stroke. R3 said she felt weird, and was not able to speak. R3 was noted to have a slight speech impairment, but was understood. In an interview on 3/12/2025 at 11:11 AM, Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) C stated that on 2/11/2025 R3 seemed off around breakfast time, and stated R3's speech was slurred, was not swallowing food, was drooling food on her gown and face, eating messy, and her speech was slurred enough that is was noticed. CNA C said R3 was pocketing food (not chewing or swallowing the food but holding it in the cheek), was not able to be verbally understood, could not understand what the bed remote was for, and said the symptoms were all new. CNA C said Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation includes intake number MI00144468. Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and 3 (#12, #40, and #89) of 20 sampled residents the facility failed to effectively provide palatable food products effecting 95 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for decreased resident food acceptance and nutritional decline. Findings include: Resident #40 (R40): In an interview on 11/19/24 at 11:16 AM, R40 stated she would not get a menu daily, and said sometimes when she would mark what she wanted on the menu she would not get what she marked. R40 said that the last week it happened everyday she did not get a menu and did not get what she wanted, and said when she did not get a menu the kitchen just serve me whatever. R40 said sometimes when she would order something for the next days meal and she did not receive that she would be upset because she was looking forward to that meal she ordered. Resident #12 (R12): In an interview on 11/19/2024 at 2:10 PM, R12 stated the food was terrible, the residents were supposed to get a menu every day at breakfast to fill out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain food service equipment effecting 95 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, and decreased illumination. Findings include: On 11/19/24 at 09:35 A.M., An initial tour of the food service was conducted with General Manager Dining Services C. The following items were noted: The True two-door reach-in cooler interior 48-inch-long fluorescent light bulbs were observed missing. General Manager Dining Services C indicated she would contact maintenance for necessary repairs as soon as possible. The 2017 FDA Model Food Code section 6-303.11 states: The light intensity shall be: (A) At least 108 lux (10 foot candles) at a distance of 75 cm (30 inches) above the floor, in walk-in refrigeration units and dry FOOD storage areas and in other areas and rooms during periods of cleaning; (B) At least 215 lux (20 foot candles): (1) At a surface where FOOD is provided for CONSUMER self-service such as buffets and salad bars or where fresh…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to securely store medication, resulting in the potential for misuse, and medication administration errors. Findings include: During an observation on 11/20/24 at 12:15 PM, hall D treatment cart, located in the hall, was noted un-locked with no staff in area and residents self propelling in the area. Continued to observe treatment cart un-locked at 12:46 p.m. During an observation and interview on 11/21/24 at 2:15 PM, observed overflowing open bin of medications located on the floor in the charge nurse office between Redies East hall and D hall. LPN Q reported was the nurse manager and exited the charge nurse office, leaving room unoccupied and door open, and entered the Redies North/East medication room. Residents were noted in common area outside nurse manager office. During an observation on 11/22/24 at 12:32 PM Redies East medication cart observed unlocked in hall with no nurse observed in the area. Residents were observed in hall. During an interview on 11/22/24 at 2:10 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) T…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was in place for prevention of skin breakdown for one (Resident 94) of 20 residents. Findings Included: Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed R94 was at risk for pressure ulcers (PU). The MDS also revealed R94 did not have any pressure ulcers, or other skin concerns. The MDS revealed R94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed R94 was at risk for PU, and had one unstagable pressure injury (not stageable due to the wound bed not being visible) that presented as a deep tissue injury (DTI) (an area over a bone that appears dark/purple, soft, and the color does not return when pressed on which can indicate a deep wound underneath). Review of R94's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R94 was admitted to Hospice upon the same date of admission the facility, 5/25/2024. Diagnoses listed were protein-calorie malnutrition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement new interventions after a fall with injury for one resident (#28) of 20 reviewed for care plans. Findings include: Review of the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set reflected Resident # 28 (R28) was [AGE] years old and resided on the facility's dementia unit. R28 scored 3 out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status. Further review of R28's clinical record revealed R28 fell on [DATE] at approximately 8:00 am. R28's fall was not witnessed, and resulted in bruising to bilateral hands. The incident report reflected R28 was taking herself to the bathroom to get cleaned up ready for breakfast. R#28's fall care plan dated 9/21/21 with the most recent revision date of 12/14/23 which added range of motion to be done during care. On 11/20/24 at 01:38 PM, during an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) H reported the dementia hall was her permanent assignment, CNA H stated she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services that met the acceptable standards of clinical practice for PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line dressings in 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #319) reviewed for PICC lines, resulting in the increased likelihood for infection. Findings include: Resident # 319(R319) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected R319 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included infection right knee post joint removal, anemia, heart failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), kidney disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease . The MDS reflected R319 had a BIM (assessment tool) score of 15 which indicated her ability to make daily decisions was cognitively intact. During an observation and interview on 11/20/24 at 4:05pm R319 was laying in bed and appeared calm, pleasant and able to answer questions without difficulty. R319 reported received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent a skin tear from developing into a stage 3 pressure ulcer for one of one resident (Resident 94). Findings Included: Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed R94 was at risk for pressure ulcers (PU). The MDS also revealed R94 did not have any pressure ulcers, or other skin concerns. The MDS revealed R94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed R94 was at risk for PU, and had one unstagable pressure injury (not stagable due to the wound bed not being visible) that presented as a deep tissue injury (DTI) (an area over a bone that appears dark/purple, soft, and the color does not return when pressed on which can indicate a deep wound underneath). Review of R94's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R94 was admitted to Hospice upon the same date of admission the facility, 5/25/2024. Diagnoses listed were protein-calorie malnutrion, encounter for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician documented in the medical record that identified medication irregularities were reviewed, the action taken, and/or the rationale for no changes to the medications for three (Resident #12, #28, and #63) of five reviewed. Findings include: Resident #12 (R12) Review of the medical record revealed R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dry eye syndrome and allergic rhinitis. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/15/24 revealed R12 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). Review of R12's Physician's Orders revealed current orders for Cetirizine HCl 5 milligrams (mg) in the morning for allergies, Systane eye gel, and Refresh eye drops. Review of the Medication Regimen Review dated 8/27/24 revealed This resident has received Cetirizine 5mg daily for allergies since 11/2023. She also has 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to justify continued use of psychotropic medications for one residents (#28) of five residents reviewed. Findings include: Resident #28 (R28) Review of the clinical record, including the Minimum Data Set reflected Resident # 28 (R28) was [AGE] years old and had diagnoses that included dementia, depression, iron deficiency and osteoporosis. R28 scored 3 out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status. R28 was observed throughout the survey dates of 11/19-11/22 to be pleasant , up daily for meals and socially engaging with staff, other residents and visitors. Review of R28's Physician's Orders revealed current orders for the antidepressant Celexa 20 milligrams daily. Pharmacy review dated 3/4/24 revealed Celexa 20 mg daily since 9/22/21 with no gradual dose reduction. The Physician/Prescriber disagreed with the recommendation based on a Physician note dated 1/30/24 that revealed R28s son wanted the Celexa 20 mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate was less than five percent when 2 medication errors were observed from a total of 25 opportunities for one resident (R319) of eight residents observed during medication administration, resulting in a medication error rate of 8%. Findings include: Resident # 319(R319) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected R319 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included infection right knee post joint removal, anemia, heart failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), kidney disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease . The MDS reflected R319 had a BIM (assessment tool) score of 15 which indicated her ability to make daily decisions was cognitively intact. During an observation on 11/21/24 at 9:14 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse(LPN) R disconnected R319 intraveounous (IV) antibiotic after the infusion and flushed first with 5ml of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effective clean and maintain the physical plant effecting 97 residents, resulting in the increased potential for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, and decreased air quality. Findings include: On 11/20/24 at 10:05 A.M., A common area environmental tour was conducted with Director of Environmental Services G. The following items were noted: Bridgeway Boulevard Two ceiling mounted return-air-exhaust ventilation grills were observed heavily soiled with accumulated and encrusted dust/dirt deposits, adjacent to resident rooms B7 and B8. Director of Environmental Services G indicated he would have maintenance staff thoroughly clean and sanitize the soiled return-air-exhaust ventilation grills as soon as possible. [NAME] Court The ceiling return-air-exhaust ventilation grill was observed heavily soiled with accumulated and encrusted dust/dirt deposits, adjacent to resident rooms C9 and C10. Dovecote Drive The ceiling return-air-exhaust…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain food service equipment effecting 104 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, and plumbing water leaks. Findings include: On 09/11/23 at 10:10 A.M., An initial tour of the food service was conducted with Dining Services Hospitality Manager X and General Manager Dining Services Y. The following items were noted: Walk-In Cooler: The refrigeration unit condenser coils were observed soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. The refrigeration unit fan blade guard covers were also observed soiled with accumulated dust and dirt deposits. The 2017 FDA Model Code section 4-602.13 states: Non-FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES of EQUIPMENT shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues. Food Preparation Double Sink: The faucet assembly was observed leaking water from the spout. Three-Compartment Sink: 1 of 2 faucet assemblies were observed leaking water from the spout. Dining Services Hospitality…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain the physical plant effecting 104 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, and decreased illumination. Findings include: On 09/11/23 at 02:00 P.M., An environmental tour of the facility Laundry Service was conducted with Environmental Services Director Z. The following item was noted: Clean Laundry Room: The two-drawer metal cabinet was observed severely (etched, scored, corroded). The interior shelves and lower cabinet surface were also observed severely corroded and particulate. Environmental Services Director Z stated: The cabinet is very old and should be replaced. On 09/11/23 at 02:15 P.M., An interview was conducted with Environmental Services Director Z regarding the facility maintenance work order system. Environmental Services Director Z stated: We have the WorxHub software system. On 09/12/23 at 09:15 A.M., A common area environmental tour was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident 75) of 1 resident reviewed was assessed for self-administration of medications resulting in unsupervised administration of medications and the potential for mismanagement of medication and potential for adverse side effects. Findings Include: Resident 75 (R75) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R75 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of end stage renal disease, dementia, depression, type 2 diabetes. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflected a score of 15 out of 15 which indicates R75 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 09/12/23 at 08:12 AM, R75 was lying in bed. It was noted he had 8 pills in a pill cup on his bedside table. R75 stated that he didn't have a chance to take them all yet and he was behind in taking them. R75 said that the nurse normally drops it off and he takes it himself. During a follow-up visit on 09/12/23 at 12:07 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse for one resident (#20) of one resident sampled for abuse resulting in allegation of abuse not being reported to the State Agency and the potential for further allegations of abuse to go unreported and not thoroughly investigated. Findings Included: Resident #20 (R20) Review of the medical record revealed R20 was admitted to the facility 05/30/2019 with diagnoses that included dementia, type 2 diabetes, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, congestive heart failure (CHF), atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension, anemia (low red blood cells), psychotic disorder with delusions, chronic pain, osteoporosis (weak and brittle bones) , cognitive impairment, depression, hyperlipidemia (high fat in blood), osteoarthritis, hearing loss, macular degeneration (eye disease causing vision loss), gout (high uric acid in bone joints), constipation, and gastro-esophageal reflux. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/17/2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to investigate, implement preventive measures, and take correction action for an allegation of physical abuse with one resident (#20) of one resident review for abuse resulting in the potential of further abuse to residents. Findings Included: Resident #20 (R20) Review of the medical record revealed R20 was admitted to the facility 05/30/2019with diagnoses that included dementia, type 2 diabetes, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, congestive heart failure (CHF), atrial fibrillation, pulmonary hypertension, anemia (low red blood cells), psychotic disorder with delusions, chronic pain, osteoporosis (weak and brittle bones) , cognitive impairment, depression, hyperlipidemia (high fat in blood), osteoarthritis, hearing loss, macular degeneration (eye disease causing vision loss), gout (high uric acid in bone joints), constipation, and gastro-esophageal reflux. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/17/2023, revealed R20 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement interventions to maintain or increase range of motion for two (Resident #3, #69) of two reviewed, resulting in the potential for a reduction in range of motion and worsening contractures. Findings include: Resident #3 (R3) Review of the medical record revealed R3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease, contracture of the left knee, and contracture of the right knee. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/27/23 revealed R3 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) and had a functional limitation in range of motion impairment on both sides of upper and lower extremities. On 09/11/23 at 11:50 AM, R3 was observed lying in bed with the head of the bed raised. R3 reported she was not receiving physical or occupational therapy services any longer. R3 reported she would like exercises for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one out of one resident (Residents #21) received the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, resulting in the potential for unmet emotional and/or mental well-being care needs. Findings include: Resident #21 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #21 (R21) admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included alcohol abuse, insomnia, muscle weakness, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/13/23 reflected R21 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). The same MDS reflected R 21 did not walk and required extensive assistance of two or more people for toileting and personal care. In an observation and interview on 09/11/23 at 10:48 AM, R21…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow pharmacy policy and acceptable practice for maintaining controlled medication for three out of 9 medications carts resulting in the potential for controlled medication diversion. Findings Included During observation of Redie hall medication cart on 09/12/2023 at 07:46 a.m. it was observed that facility Controlled Substance Inventory document was signed by the out-going nurse for the date of 09/13/2023 (11 p.m. to 7 a.m.) but was not signed by the on-coming nurse. In an interview on 09/13/2023 at 08:38 a.m. Registered Nurse (RN) L explained that a physical count was to be completed for all controlled medication at the beginning of each shift when there is a change of nurses. RN L explained that the on-coming and off-going nurse would do a manual count of the controlled medication. RN L explained that each nurse would then place their signature, in the appropriate place, on the Controlled Substance Inventory document. RN L confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the medication regimen irregularities were reviewed, acted upon, and documented in the medical record for one (Resident #3) of five reviewed, resulting in the potential for unnecessary medications and adverse reactions. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease, and insomnia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/27/23 revealed R3 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). Review of R3's Progress Notes revealed monthly medication regimen reviews contained comments/recommendations on 1/21/23, 3/18/23, and 7/29/23. The medical record did not include documentation as to what the recommendations were, or physician follow up to the recommendations. In an interview on 09/12/23 at 3:25 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) B reported she had only been at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to justify the continued PRN (as needed) use and/or provide a duration of use of a psychotropic medication for one (Resident #3) of five reviewed, resulting in the potential for unnecessary medications and adverse reactions. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease, and insomnia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/27/23 revealed R3 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). Review of the Physician's Order dated 8/9/22 revealed and order for trazodone daily at bedtime as needed for sleep. Review of R3's Progress Notes revealed monthly medication regimen reviews contained comments/recommendations on 1/21/23, 3/18/23, and 7/29/23. The medical record did not include documentation as to what the recommendations were, or physician follow up to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to label medication in accordance with accepted professional principles, dating of open medication for one out of nine medication carts resulting in the potential for residents to receive expired medication that is not providing its effective efficiency. Findings Included: During observation of the D wing medication cart on [DATE] at 10:19 a.m. it was observed that the following medications did not have a date when the medication was opened placed on the container of the medications: Timolo Maleate Opthalmic 0.5 precent eye drops, Azelastin HCL (hydrochloride) 0.05 percent eye drops, and Latanoprost Ophthalmic .005 percent eye drops. In an interview on [DATE] at 10:19 a.m. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) P explained that all multiple use medication containers, for specific residents, should be dated at the time that the medication container is opened. LPN P explained that the medications found undated above would be destroyed and new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to clean/disinfect the glucometer (machine used to determine blood sugar levels) used for two residents (#113, #322) of two residents sampled during observation of blood level glucose testing and failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed by a care giver during the collection of bodily fluids resulting in the potential to development and of infection and spread of infection to other residents. Findings Included: Resident #113 (R113) Review of the medical record revealed R113 was admitted to the facility 08/22/2023 with diagnoses that included osteoporosis (weak and brittle bones), pathological fracture of the right femur (leg), cellulitis (bacterial skin infection) of right lower limb, elevated white blood cells, pathological fracture of the right humerus (arm), anemia (low red blood cells in blood), Sjogren syndrome (Immune disorder), type 2 diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, thrombocytopenia (low platelets in blood), and hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVANGELICAL HOMES OF MICHIGAN | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 01/01/1971 |
| ANDERSON, LINDA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 05/01/2024 |
| CURRENTON, JAMES | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 05/01/2024 |
| MANGI, JAMES | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 05/01/2024 |
| OMARTIAN, CHARITY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 05/01/2024 |
| SNYDER, SHANNON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/13/2025 |
| HOLDA, STEVEN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/01/2024 |
| WELLINGS, JULIA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/01/2020 |
| STIER, NANCYLEE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235238. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.