Sanilac Medical Care Facility

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 64 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 28.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 75.9 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.32 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.44 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.61 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00140471 and MI00142854. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure comprehensive documentation and evaluation to prevent the development of an unstageable facility-acquired pressure ulcer for one resident (Resident #63) of seven residents reviewed for alterations in skin integrity, resulting in Resident #63 acquiring and developing an unstageable pressure ulcer. Findings include: Resident #63: During initial tour on 6/25/2024, Resident #63 was observed sitting in bed visiting with his wife. He stated his goal was to return home but know he has some work to do before that can occur. On 6/25/2024 at approximately 1:30 PM, a review was completed of Resident#63's medical records and it revealed he initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple readmissions with diagnoses that included, Chronic Osteomyelitis, Diabetes, Acute Kidney Failure, Metabolic Acidosis, Monoplegia, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, Stage 4, Bipolar…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-07-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Numbers MI00144103 and MI00144517. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate interventions were in place, interventions were followed and supervision was provided to prevent falls with injury for 2 residents (Resident #38, and Resident #44) of 5 residents reviewed for falls, resulting in Resident #38 falling during a transfer, having pain and a decline in transfer status to a Hoyer lift, and Resident #44 sustaining fractures in her right foot during a transfer. Findings Include: Resident #44: Accidents: On 6/25/24 at 10:56 AM, Resident #44 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in her room. She was alert and talkative. She said she broke some of her toes on her right foot during a transfer in the bathroom. She said she was supposed to have 2 people help her with the transfer and only one staff member assisted her; She stated, I have a twist it board to stand on with transfers and my foot wasn't on it quite right. They said I broke…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Past Non-Compliance (PNC) was identified during the investigation of the deficient practice and was accepted by the survey team upon exit from the facility for this citation. Following discussion with the State Manager, Past Non-Compliance was accepted with a Compliance Date of 01/28/2026.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident safety when care-planned interventions were not followed during a transfer to a wheelchair for one resident (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for an injury of unknown origin. Findings include:Resident #1 (R1):On 2/2/26 at 12:29 PM, an observation was made of Resident 1 (R1) sitting in their wheelchair in the dining area of the secured unit of the facility. The Resident had her right leg elevated with a cast on it. The Resident had drinks in front of her and the residents in the dining area were getting ready to eat. An observation was made of a sling with red trim positioned underneath the Resident. The sling was a mechanical lift…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the kitchen resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include:On 08/19/2025 at 8:45AM during the initial kitchen tour with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) N, the rag sanitizer bucket was tested with Hydrion quaternary ammonia test strips, and the result was zero. The CDM N changed out the bucket and retested it, and the second result was between 150-200ppm. On 08/20/2025 at 9:03 AM the rag sanitizer bucket was retested with the quaternary test strips, and the result was zero. Conducted interview with the Certified Dietary Manager N on the desired concentration range for the sanitizer and she answered 50-100 ppm. When questioned about how often the sanitizer bucket was changed out, she stated that it is changed every morning and evening shift. She then proceeded to tell dishwashing staff to change out the bucket. Record review of the sanitizer with the label EPA Reg No. 10324-81, according to the product…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-08-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure cleanliness of the water system and the use of appropriate backflow prevention on cross connections. This deficient practice increases the likelihood of contamination of the water supply due to uncleanliness and a potential backflow event, potentially affecting all residents, staff, and visitors who consume water at the facility. Findings include:On 08/19/2025 at 1:30PM during the environmental tour with the Director of Operations K, Maintenance Assistant L, and Maintenance Assistant M, observed the water softener brine tank filled with a black foam substance in the main boiler room. Conducted interview with Maintenance Assistant L, he stated that the brine tank is cleaned out every three years and that the cleaning is due. On 08/19/2025 at 1:45 - 2:20PM observed black foam inside the brine tank of the water softener located in the boiler room in the 800 hallway. On 08/19/2025 at 1:45 - 2:20PM observed the drain line to the water softener sitting inside the drain, located in the boiler room in 800…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-21 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing to meet the care needs of the residents for a confidential group of residents, and Residents #10, # 50, #52, and #89, resulting in long call light wait times, scheduled activities being cancelled and delayed resident care. Findings include:Facility On 08/20/2025 at 2:00PM, a resident council meeting was held with a confidential group of residents. One confidential resident stated they have numerous long call light wait times. A review of call light response times revealed that on 8/16/25 the resident waited 36 minutes and 26 minutes. On 8/17/25 the resident had wait times 32 minutes, 28 minutes and 26 minutes. On 8/18/25 the resident had a wait time of 49 minutes. Another confidential resident stated, we only have one certified nursing assistant (CNA) per hall and if they are busy then we can wait too long. We need more help around here; the CNA's are so busy they can't answer call lights on time. The confidential group stated they believe the facility needs more CNA staff, they think…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent verbal abuse for one (Resident #40) of 19 residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in refused care, frustration with the likelihood of increased behavioral disturbances. Findings include:This citation pertains to intake 2594908 On 8/19/2025, at 12:10 PM, Resident #40 was asked if they were happy with their room and Resident #40 offered, that it was a new room. Resident #40 complained there was a girl that worked there and that they had laughed at their grandmother. Resident #40 offered, that they always say hi to them but this girl has got it in for me. Resident #40 was unable to detail the girl's appearance other than she wore pink outfits. On 8/19/2025, at 12:30 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) offered, they called CNA H to interview them regarding Resident #40 as they left out of the facility prior to the DON arriving. The DON stated, that CNA H was alerted they would be reported for verbal abuse and that CNA H stated, no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening/Annual Resident Review (PASARR) form DCH-3877 and DCH-3878 were completed for one resident (Resident #67) of two residents reviewed for PASARR evaluation.Findings Include: A review of Resident #67's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 7/30/2003 and readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included history of traumatic brain injury, anxiety, mood disorder, mental disorder due to known physiological condition, dementia and need for assistance with personal care. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed the Resident had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making and was dependent on helper for activities of daily living and mobility. A review of Resident #67's medical record revealed PASARR Level I Screening dated 10/12/2023. The form (Form-3877) indicated Section II-Screening Criteria items 1-6 revealed the following:-1. Yes, The person has a current diagnoses of Mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failure to ensure availability and accurate documentation for Lexapro (antidepressant medication) for one resident (34) of 5 reviewed for medication management, resulting in Resident #34 not receiving her medications for approximately three weeks and imprecise medication administration documentation.Findings Include:On 8/20/2025 at approximately 9:15 AM, a review was conducted of Resident #34's medical record and it indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia, Hyperlipidemia, Hypertension, Adjustment Disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood and Anxiety. Further review revealed the following:Physician Orders:Lexapro Oral Tablet 5 MG (milligram)- Give one tablet by mouth one time a day for agitation, irritability, depressed mood.August 2025 MAR (Medication Administration Record)Of the twenty days reviewed on the MAR, Lexapro was administered 10 times. It can be noted Resident #34 did not have lexapro available for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure restorative therapy services were provided for two Residents (#36 and 50), of three reviewed for limited range of motion. Findings include: Resident #36 On 8/20/2025, at 2:15 PM, a record review of Resident #36's electronic medical record revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, difficulty in walking and need for assistance with personal care. Resident #36 required assistance with all Activities of Daily Living and had intact cognition. A review of the physician orders revealed NURSING REHAB/RESTORATIVE: ACTIVE ROM Program AROM: Dumb bells 2# 2x15 BI/TRI-2.5 # A.W 2x25 kicks, knee lifts, hip Abd/add and ankle pumps. Static standing x3 to tolerance performing task. Start: 7/31/2025 End: 8/28/25. NURSING REHAB/RESTORATIVE: Walking Program 3 x week CGA FWW 150x2 no WC to follow: Start: 7/31/25 End 8/28/25 A review of the The resident has limited physical mobility r/t (related to) weakness Date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an indwelling urinary catheter bag and tubing were not in contact with the floor during transport of the Resident through the dining area and hallway and when the Resident was seated in their wheelchair in their room, for one Resident (#2), of two reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. Findings include:A review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission into the facility on 4/30/25 with diagnoses that included diabetes, pressure ulcer of sacral region Stage IV, need for assistance with personal care, and dementia. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 8/15 that indicated moderately impaired cognition, and the Resident was dependent on helper for activities of daily living, transfers and mobility. Further review of the medical record revealed the Resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. On 8/19/25 at 12:56 PM, an observation was made of Resident #2 in the dining room for the lunchtime meal. The Resident was seated in a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake MI00142721 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer a nebulizer treatment according to professional standards for Resident #35, administer medications as prescribed by the physician for Resident #224 and Resident #322, and ensure standards of practice for appropriate diagnosis and use of multiple psychotropic and antipsychotic medications for Resident #377, of seven residents reviewed for medication administration and five residents reviewed for medication regimen review, resulting in Resident #35 not assessed prior to administration or monitored during the duration of a nebulizer treatment with the potential for complications to go unnoticed, untreated or not receive the prescribed amount of medication used to treat lung disease, the potential for exacerbation of medical conditions for Resident #35, Resident #224 and Resident #322, and inappropriate diagnosis and treatment for Resident #377. Findings include: Resident #35: On 6/27/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-07-31 for 13 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $62K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI