Arbor Manor Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 146 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 35.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 68 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 95.5 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.23 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.83 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake number MI00149135. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure for one out of three residents (Resident #1) proper and safe transfer with an assistive device was conducted resulting in harm to the resident. Findings Included: Review of Resident #1's (R1) electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R1's had resided at the facility since 2013; Diagnosis included multiple sclerosis and muscle weakness. Review of a progress note dated [DATE], revealed R1 had a fall. The note revealed R1 was noted to be on the floor with her back to the bed, and the assistive device (sit to stand-a device that lifts a person from a sitting to a standing position) in front of her. The note revealed that R1 made a statement that her legs gave out. This was noted in the note to have occurred while the sit to stand was in use on R1. Further review of R1's progress notes revealed that on [DATE] at R1 had complained of pain to both lower legs. The note revealed R1's pain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain food service equipment effecting 92 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination, bacterial harborage, and toxic chemical residue.Findings include:During an observation and interview on 5/05/2026 at 9:07 a.m., of initial kitchen tour, Food Service Manager (FSM) N reported had worked at facility about 10 months. FSM N directed this surveyor to single hand-washing sink located in kitchen with trash can located next to sink with unfunctional lid. After washing hands, foot pedal on trash can was not functioning properly, and lid had to be handled with clean hands to open, and observe several used paper towels in trash can. FSM N reported would replace trash can. Continued tour with staff observed using dish machine. FSM N reported dish machine was low temperature chemical machine and staff monitor temperatures daily and record on log and monitor chemical level in large buckets…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate advance directives (legal documents that allow a person to identify decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time) information was in place for two resident (#12, #78) of two residents reviewed for advance directives.Findings Included:Resident #12 (R12)Review of the medical record revealed R12 was admitted to the facility [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, atrial fibrillation, venous insufficiency (when leg veins [NAME] efficiently return blood to the heart), polyosteioarthritis (a form of arthritis affecting five or more joints), asthma, hypertension, anxiety, hypothyroidism (low thyroid hormone), delusional disorders, and depression. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], revealed R12 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 3 (severe cognitive impairment) out of 15. During an attempted interview [DATE] at 09:32 a.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living care (showering and shaving) for one dependent resident (#61) of two residents reviewed.Findings Included: Resident #61 (R61)Review of the medical record revealed R61 was admitted to the facility 08/26/20222 with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease, dementia, polyarthritis (arthritis in five or more joints), insomnia, kidney disease, peripheral neuropathy (nerve damage in nerves), gout (high uric acid in joints), urinary retention, sleep apnea, gastro-esophageal reflux, and muscle weakness. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/09/2026, revealed R61 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 3 (severe cognitive impairment) out of 15. Section GG- Functional Abilities of MDS, with the same ARD, revealed R61 was dependent for shower/bathe self and dependent for personal hygiene.On 05/05/2026 at 09:12 a.m. during observation and interview, R61 was observed sitting in chair at the side of his bed. R61 was observed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper positioning was in place for one resident (resident #28) of two residents reviewed for positioning. Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #28 (R28) was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R28 scored 7 out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and was receiving hospice care. On 05/05/2026 at 9:56 AM, R28 was observed sitting in her room in high back wheelchair. The footrests were on the wheelchair but R28's feet do not touch and were observed dangling. R28 was observed to be sitting on a wheelchair pad, a pillow and the sling to a mechanical lift. R28 was observed in the dining room at the noon meal with her feet dangling from the wheelchair. Observations of R28 were made on 05/06/2026 at 9:35 AM in her room watching television,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide range of motion (ROM) to one (R11) of two reviewed. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart failure and polyarthritis (arthritis affecting multiple joints). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/28/26 revealed R11 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) and had functional limitation in range of motion impairments both sides of the lower extremities. On 05/05/2026 at 1:57 PM, R11 was observed lying in bed. R11 reported she had previously received therapy services, but her insurance no longer covered therapy services. R11 reported during therapy, she did exercises with her arms and legs. R11 reported she knew what exercises she should perform, but reported since therapy services ended, staff did not assist her with any exercises or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the attending physician documented his/her rationale for not changing medication as requested by the pharmacist for one resident (#6) of five residents pharmacy reviews. Findings Included:Resident #6 (R6)Review of the medical record revealed R6 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (CHF), epilepsy (neurological disorder causing seizures), type 2 diabetes, morbid obesity, bladder dysfunction, heart disease, hypothyroidism (low thyroid hormone) atrial fibrillation, restless leg syndrome, insomnia, depression, gout (build-up of uric acid in bone joints), hypertension, and hyperlipidemia (high fat content in blood). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/27/2026, revealed R6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively intact) of 15.Review of R6's medial record revealed a Consultant Pharmacist Medication Regimen Review, dated 02/07/2026,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5% when 2 of 26 medications for two residents (R7 and R31) were not administered in accordance with physician's orders resulting in a medication error rate of 7.69%.Findings include:R7 Review of the medical record revealed R7 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia and congestive heart failure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/27/26 revealed R7 scored 9 out of 15 (moderate cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). During an observation on 5/6/26 at 8:35 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) I prepared medications for R7. LPN I reported R7 took his medications crushed. LPN I separated a few medications that were not allowed to be crushed. Amongst those medications was ferrous gluconate 324 milligrams (mg). LPN I then used a pill cutter to cut those medications in half,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection prevention and control practices during medication administration for one (R31) of two reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R31 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure and hypertension. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/3/26 revealed R31 scored 11 out of 15 (moderate cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). During an observation on 05/06/2026 at 8:14 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) S prepared medications for R31. LPN S dispensed 11 of R31's 14 medications into her bare hand and then placed each medication in the pill cup. The medications included hydralazine, metformin, bumetanide, colchicine, diltiazem, tamsulosin, duloxetine, eliquis, metolazone, metoprolol, and potassium chloride. LPN S then administered the medications to R31. In an interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain documentation that pneumococcal immunization education was provided and whether consent or declination was received for one (R11) of five reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R11 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart failure and atrial fibrillation. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/28/26 revealed R11 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) and was offered and declined the pneumococcal immunization. Review of R11's medical revealed no documentation of pneumococcal immunization education, consent or declination. On 05/07/2026 at 10:56 AM, Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A reported the facility was not able to locate a consent or declination for R11's pneumococcal immunization. In an interview on 05/07/2026 at 11:21 AM, Director of Nursing (DON) B reported she was the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain food service equipment effecting 84 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination and bacterial harborage. Findings include: On 03/03/25 at 07:30 A.M., An initial tour of the food service was conducted with Dietary Aide C. The following items were noted: Ice [NAME] were observed protruding from the Walk-In Freezer Freon refrigerant inlet supply lines. The Walk-In Freezer ceiling surface was also observed with accumulated ice droplets, adjacent to the refrigeration fan unit. The Can Opener Assembly was observed soiled with accumulated and encrusted food residue. The 2022 FDA Model Food Code section 4-601.11 states: (A) EQUIPMENT FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES and UTENSILS shall be clean to sight and touch. (B) The FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES of cooking EQUIPMENT and pans shall be kept free of encrusted grease deposits and other soil accumulations. (C) NonFOOD-CONTACT SURFACES of EQUIPMENT shall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI