MyMichigan Skilled Nursing Facility

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

69.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 55 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 29 beds and averages 22.7 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.06 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.76 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.30 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 2.34 to 1.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-03-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of facility-acquired pressure ulcer injuries for one resident (Resident #8), resulting in facility-acquired (in-house) development of pressure ulcers, pain, discomfort, and the likelihood for prolonged illness or hospitalization. Findings include: Record review of the facility provided 'Skilled Nursing Facility Skin Conditions Prevention and Treatment' policy, dated 11/20/2023, revealed the purpose was to promote the prevention of pressure ulcer development, healing of those that are present and prevention of additional pressure wounds. Pressure injury- is localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device. The injury can present as intact skin or an open ulcer and may be painful. The injury occurs as a result of intense and/or prolonged pressure or pressure in combination of shear. Stage II (2): Partial thickness skin loss with exposed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures for fall prevention for one resident (Resident #6) of five residents reviewed, resulting in a lack of implementation of Physical Therapy recommendations, lack of enactment and reevaluation of planned care plan interventions, and Resident #6 experiencing a fall with a head laceration necessitating emergency medical treatment, staples, unnecessary pain, and the likelihood for additional falls with injury. Findings include: Resident #6: On 3/4/24 at 11:23 AM, Resident #6 was not in their room. An observation of their room was completed. There were no fall prevention interventions, including a fall mat observed in the room. Record review revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, left hemiplegia and hemiparesis (one sided paralysis) following cerebral infarction (stroke), atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm), and weakness.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation pertains to Intake Number MI00140583. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary supervision for one resident (Resident #101), who was left in the dining room unsupervised with a hot cup of coffee, which did not have a lid on it. The resident spilled the hot coffee on her lower abdomen and upper thigh area, resulting in first and second degree burns, pain, wound care and prolonged healing time. Findings Include: Resident #101: Review of the Face Sheet, Minimum Data Set (resident assessment tool) dated 9/22/23, progress notes dated 10/20/23, physician's orders dated 10/20/23 through 11/16/23 and care plans dated 9/21/23, revealed that Resident #101 was 81 years-old, admitted to the facility on [DATE], had decreased cognition, (and thus was not able to be interviewed), dependent on staff for all Activities of Daily Living and required set-up with eating. The resident's diagnoses included, right-sided hemiplegia and weakness, hemorrhagic stroke,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an active plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP). This deficient practice has the increased potential to result in waterborne pathogens existing and spread in the facility's plumbing system and an increased risk of respiratory infection among all residents in the facility. Findings include:On 04/14/2026 at 9:53am observed two spigots on dirty side of laundry room. During this observation, Housekeeping Manager C was interviewed on whether the spigots were used for anything, and she stated they are not used. On 04/14/2026 at 9:55am observed two dead-end lines coming down from the ceiling that are not connected to anything, adjacent to the washers. The unused piping looked identical to the washer hookups. During this observation, Housekeeping Manager C was interviewed on whether the lines were used for anything and stated they haven't used them since she's been working here. On 04/14/2026 at 9:57am observed a dead-end water line with what…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-15 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate indications for use of chemical restraints for 5 residents (Residents #4, #11, #12, #17 and #23), of 12 residents reviewed for chemical restraints, resulting in, decreased communication between professional staff, the protentional for unmet resident needs, care not tailored toward residents' needs, and sedation with falls. Findings Include: Review of the facility Behavior Management Monitoring Policy and Procedure last reviewed on 4/2025, stated The Behavioral Management Committee (BMC) shall monitor weekly and more frequently as needed: use of psychoactive medications and for potential to reduce/eliminate psychoactive medications. The BMC will seek to determine if there is justification for the initiation of psychoactive medications. The Social Worker will review the progress notes (nursing notes) and POC (Care Plans) prior to BMC reviews. During an interview done on 4/14/26 at 10:30 a.m., Social Service RN E, stated Our…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures to ensure that informed consent was obtained prior to initiation of psychotropic medications for one resident (Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include:Resident #2:Record review revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included generalized anxiety disorder and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was cognitively intact and required moderate to total assistance to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) with the exception of supervision/set up for oral care and eating. The MDS further detailed the Resident displayed no behaviors. Review of Resident #2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a care plan entitled, Psychotropic Drug Use: (Resident #2) is at risk for adverse consequence from receiving psychotropic medication: Lamictal (anticonvulsant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a restorative nursing program and ensure coordination with therapy services for one resident (Resident #6) of one resident reviewed for limited Range of Motion (ROM). Findings include:Resident #6: On 4/13/26 at 11:16 AM, Resident #6 was observed participating in an activity in the dining room. Resident #6 was in a highbacked wheelchair with both of their lower extremities positioned on the footrests of the wheelchair. Record review revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus, saddle embolus (blood clot) of pulmonary artery, right and left foot drop foot contractures. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was cognitively intact, had impaired ROM in both lower extremities, and was dependent upon staff for bathing, toileting, and transferring. The MDS further detailed the Resident was not receiving any therapy and/or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring for the presence of potential adverse consequences of anticoagulation medication therapy for one resident (Resident #6) of two residents reviewed for anticoagulation medication therapy. Findings include:Resident #6: Record review revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus, right and left foot drop foot contractures, and saddle embolus (blood clot) of pulmonary artery. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident was cognitively intact and required moderate to total assistance to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) with the exception of oral care and eating. Review of Resident #6's Health Care Provider (HCP) orders and Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the Resident was receiving Eliquis (anticoagulant or blood thinner medication) 5 milligrams (mg) twice a day (BID) (Start Date: 3/24/25). A review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than 5% when two medication errors were observed for two residents (Resident #7 and Resident #16) from a total of 32 observations, resulting in a medication error rate of 6.25%. Findings include:Resident #7:On 4/15/26 at 7:27 AM, a medication pass observation for Resident #7 was completed with Registered Nurse (RN) K. RN K was observed preparing Resident #7's medication at the medication cart outside of the Resident's room. While preparing the medications, RN K removed one bethanechol chloride (medication commonly used to treat urinary retention) 10 milligram (mg) tablet from the blister pack and placed in a medication cup. The blister pack had a sticker on it with the instructions, Take on an empty stomach. Resident #7 was able to be visualized from the medication cart in the hallway. A food tray was observed on the overbed table in front of them. RN K proceeded to lock the medication cart and was stopped and asked if they were going to administer all the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a call bell communication device was responded to for two residents (#9, #72), of 22 sampled residents, resulting in Resident #9 and #72 being seated in the dining room with a silver metal service bell which was rung with no response from facility staff. Findings include: Observation on 2/19/2025 during the initial tour of the facility resident dining room at the noon meal revealed that there was no electronic call bell system with resident push buttons noted in the dining room area. Observation and interview was made on 02/19/25 at 09:34 AM with Resident #9 who stated that she was thirsty and wet (wet brief) and wanted to lay down. Resident #9 was observed with a silver metal service bell in dining room on the table. Resident #9 was able to demonstrate ringing the bell which rang 3-4 times. The State surveyor observed two staff members seated across the hall at the nursing station, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA)/ward clerk H and Registered Nurse (RN) E. Neither staff member responded to see what…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide for safe wheelchair transport for two residents (#7 and 17) of two residents reviewed, resulting in residents being pushed in wheelchairs without footrests and the potential for injury. Findings include: Resident #7: On 2/19/25 at 10:14 AM, Activity Staff L was observed pushing Resident #7 down the hallway in their wheelchair without footrests. Record review revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, anxiety, left hip injury, and bone density disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/31/25, revealed the Resident was severely cognitively impaired and required substantial assistance with toileting, personal hygiene, and dressing. The MDS specified the Resident was independent with wheelchair mobility. Review of Resident #7's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a care plan entitled, (Resident #7) is at risk of falls r/t (related to) history of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and operationalize policies and procedures for psychotropic medication use for one resident (Resident # 7) of five residents reviewed resulting in a lack of appropriate diagnoses and indications for treatment, a lack of Gradual Dose Reductions (GDR), and the potential for ineffective and inappropriate treatment. Findings include: Resident #7: On 2/19/25 at 10:00 AM, Resident #7 was observed sitting in their wheelchair in their room with a forlorn look on their face. An interview was completed at this time. When asked how they were doing, Resident #7 made eye contact but did not provide a verbal response. When asked if they were sad, Resident #7 shook their head yes and began to cry. On 2/19/25 at 10:05 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was informed the Resident began crying when asked if they were sad but did not provide any information regarding the reason they were sad. The DON stated, That is (Resident #7's) normal. (Resident #7) startles…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility Failed to 1) Ensure that kitchen food items are dated with received by dates and use by dates and 2) Ensure that foods brought into the facility from family are dated, resulting in an increased likelihood for food borne illness with the potential to affect 22 Residents residing at the facility who consumed oral nutrition from the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the U.S. Public Health Service 2009 Food Code, as adopted by the Michigan Food Law, effective 10/1/2012, directs that open or partially used foods that are refrigerated. ready-to-eat and potentially hazardous are required to have use-by-date or date to be consumed. During the initial tour of the facility kitchen done on 2/19/2025 from 8:50 AM through 10:00 AM accompanied by Certified Dietary Manager I, the following was identified: Observation and interview on 02/19/25 at 08:50 AM with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) I, of the line of in kitchen refrigerators revealed in a refrigerator clear elongated manual thermometers to be reading 8 degrees, and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$32,175 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $32,175 — penalty dated 2024-03-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in MI