Roubal Care and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 39 beds and averages 36.8 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and proper use of assistive devices (gait belt and wheelchair) to prevent a fall with major injury (fractured femur) for one Resident #37 (R37) out of one resident reviewed for falls. This deficient practice resulted in harm when R37 fell while ambulating with staff and subsequently fractured his femur requiring a surgical hip repair. Findings include:All times noted are in Eastern Daylight-Saving Time (EDST), unless otherwise noted. Resident #37 (R37) Review of R37's Progress Notes revealed the following, in part: 1/12/2025 15:44 ([:44 Central Standard Time (CST)]: Resident ambulating in hall with staff assistance, utilizing walker, wheelchair to follow. Stopped to sit in WC (wheelchair) lost balance and fell from standing position into wall on right side of body head hitting cement wall .Resident complains of right hip pain, unable to lift right leg. Appears misaligned .1/12/25 16:01 (4:01 p.m. CST); Resident left with paramedics at this time .1/12/25 18:35 (6:35 p.m. CST); .resident is being…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen.Findings include: During a tour of the walk-in cooler, at 7:58 AM on 6/25/25, it was observed that storage racks in the walk-in cooler were found with an accumulation of debris on the open wire rack shelving. Observation of the floor in the walk-in cooler found a dried yellow spill on the floor as well as an accumulation of debris and paper trash under racks and alongside the perimeter of the floor. During a tour of the walk-in freezer, at 8:00 AM on 6/25/25, it was observed that the floor of the walk-in cooler was full of paper trash debris from date marking stickers. During a tour of the clean utensil drawer, at 8:38 AM on 6/25/25, it was observed that an accumulation of crumbs were found along the back wall of the drawer. When asked how often this area gets cleaned out, Dietary Manager (DM)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:Ensure the use of infection control measures were practiced according to current guidelines and professional standards of practice for three Residents (#31 and #13) of 11 residents reviewed for infection control practices.Have an active and ongoing plan for reducing the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP). This deficient practice has the increased potential to result in waterborne pathogens to exist and spread in the facility's plumbing system and an increased risk of respiratory infection among any or all the residents in the facility. Resident #31 (R31)Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/22/2025, revealed R31 was admitted to facility on 8/14/2024 and had diagnoses including obstructive uropathy, peripheral vascular disease, morbid obesity, and depression. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed R31 had an indwelling urinary catheter, was always incontinent of bowel,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a dignified care experience for two Residents (#31 and #14) of two residents reviewed for dignity, resulting in R31 expressing feelings of humiliation and helplessness.Findings include:All times recorded in Eastern Daylight Time (EDT), unless otherwise noted.Resident #31 (R31)Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/22/2025, revealed R31 was admitted to facility on 8/14/2024 and had diagnoses including obstructive uropathy, peripheral vascular disease, morbid obesity, and depression. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed R31 had an indwelling urinary catheter, was always incontinent of bowel, required substantial/maximal staff assistance for toileting hygiene and bathing, and was dependent on staff for all transfers and mobility. R31 scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating he was cognitively intact. On 6/25/25 at 8:59 a.m., an observation in the 300 Hall revealed the door to R31's room was closed. Upon entering, R31 was observed lying in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain facility living areas odor free and with comfortable temperatures for two Residents #7 and #31 (R7 and R31) of 16 residents reviewed for a safe, clean, comfortable environment. This deficient practice resulted in resident dissatisfaction with unbearably hot living conditions and the smell of urine in R7's room.Findings include: All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Time, unless otherwise noted. Resident #7 (R7) Review of R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/1/25, revealed R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included the following, in part: hypertension, end-stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus, dementia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). R7 did not complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) but was documented with severely impaired cognition. R7 required Setup or clean-up assistance with upper body dressing, lower body dressing, putting on/taking off footwear (including…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the timely provision of ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care for two Residents (#31 and #25) of two residents reviewed for ADL care.Findings include:All times recorded in Eastern Daylight Time (EDT), unless otherwise noted.Resident #31 (R31)Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/22/2025, revealed R31 was admitted to facility on 8/14/2024 and had diagnoses including diabetes, obstructive uropathy, peripheral vascular disease, morbid obesity, and depression. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed R31 had an indwelling urinary catheter, was always incontinent of bowel, required substantial/maximal staff assistance for toileting hygiene and bathing, and was dependent on staff for all transfers and mobility. R31 scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating he was cognitively intact. On 6/25/2025 at 8:59 a.m., an observation in the 300 Hall revealed the door to R31's room was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently implement a bowel protocol program for one Resident (R32) of 2 Residents reviewed for bowel function in a total sample of 12 residents. This deficient practice resulted in extended periods of time when R32 had no documented bowel movement, with increased risk for pain and discomfort and/or the risk for medical complications such as bowel impaction. Findings include:All times recorded in Eastern Daylight Time (EDT), unless otherwise noted.A review of the medical record revealed that Resident #32 (R32) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic systolic congestive heart failure, protein-calorie malnutrition and encounter for palliative care. Review of R32's Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 5/22/25, revealed Section O (Special Treatments and Programs) noted R32 was on hospice care. The physician's orders for R32 included Fentanyl (a pain medication with known side effects of constipation).A review was conducted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary oxygen tubing for three Residents (R6, R32 and R34) of four Residents reviewed for respiratory care.Findings include: All times recorded in Eastern Daylight Time (EDT), unless otherwise noted.Resident #6 (R6)A review of R6's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an initial admission to the facility on 4/24/25 with diagnoses including chronic diastolic congestive heart failure. A review of R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/5/25, revealed Section O (Special Treatments and Programs) reported while residing in the facility R6 required the use of oxygen. A Physician's order was written for R6 Change oxygen tubing weekly, date and initial tubing with each change.On 6/26/25 at 3:24 PM, R6 was observed in her room with an oxygen concentrator. The oxygen tubing was dated as last changed on 6/16/25.Resident #32 (R32)A review of R32's EMR revealed initial admission to the facility on 2/7/25 with diagnoses including chronic systolic congestive heart failure. A review of R32's MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5% for three Residents (R6, R7 & R 1) of 9 residents reviewed for medication administration. This deficient practice resulted in a medication administration error rate of 12.00%, based on 3 medication errors in 25 opportunities for error.Findings include:All times noted are Eastern Daylight Savings Times (EDST) unless otherwise noted. Resident R21On 6/26/25 at 9:18 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) A was observed preparing and administering medications on the 300 Hall medication cart. When preparing medications for R21, RN A punched out one 88 mcg (microgram) tablet of Levothyroxine that landed on top of the medication cart which had not been disinfected, nor was a barrier in place. RN A donned clean gloves without the performance of hand hygiene, picked up the tablet and placed it into R21's plastic medication cup for administration to the Resident.During an interview on 6/26/25 at 9:31 a.m., when asked if the top of the 300 Hall medication cart was clean or dirty, RN…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-05-15 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for a least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. Findings include: During an interview on 5/15/2024 at 1:53 PM, the DON and the Nursing Home Administrator reported that the facility had 2 RNs employed, in addition to the DON until 3/08/2024 when RN F resigned. The NHA reported that despite attempts to recruit more RNs, no RNs had been hired yet. Review of a Facility Assessment dated 4/19/2024 reflected Facility Staffing was to include, RN Supervisor (2 RN's - Full -time, 10-hour shift, 4 days a week and each and every 4th weekend each and on call. RN supervisor coverage 7 days a week. Review of the March 2024 -Nurses master schedule reflected there were 2 RNs in addition to the DON scheduled (RN E and RN F). Per the DON and NHA, RN F resigned on 3/08/2024, leaving the facility without an RN for at least 8 hours a day, 7 days a week beginning on 3/16/2024. Review of an April 2024 - Nurses master schedule reflected there was only one RN (RN E) other than the Director of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This citation is related to intake # MI00-138390 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1). Implement a system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, volunteers, and visitors and 2.) investigate and document the outbreak of gastrointestinal illness and respiratory illness among staff and residents. Findings: Review of the January 2024 Infection Surveillance Monthly Report revealed an outbreak of RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus). Review of the February-March 2024 Infection Surveillance Monthly Report revealed an outbreak of Norovirus (gastrointestinal illness). During an interview on 5/15/2024 at 8:07 AM, Director of Regulatory Compliance (DRC) C reported she was the Infection Preventionist and responsible for staff and resident infection surveillance. DRC C reported, when staff called off of work she would review the call-in sheet and determine if the call-in was infectious or not. DRC C reported employee call-ins were tracked in real time. DRC C reported that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-07-25 for 14 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 1 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $362K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI