No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Pomeroy Living Sterling Skilled Rehabilitation

34643 Ketsin Drive, Sterling Heights, MI 48310 · For profit - Corporation · 176 certified beds · (586) 978-2280 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (586) 978-2280 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 19 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (19) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
34770 Dequindre Rd · (586) 264-9470 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
34644 Dequindre Rd · (586) 698-0336 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
34714 Dequindre Rd · (586) 264-6200 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2775 15 Mile Rd · (586) 446-2700 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.2%10.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.6%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.5%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%3.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.1%12.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.6%19.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.1%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.9%5.1%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.0%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.3%14.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.3%79.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.6%24.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.4%11.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.151.841.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.261.641.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 622 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

61.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
14.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
49.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.49U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.23hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 49.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 309 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF61.6%CMS range 57.0–65.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF14.8%CMS range 12.1–17.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge49.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge54.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 5.5–9.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.851.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.81
RN hours/ resident / day
0.92
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.20
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.92
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.71
RN hoursweekends
38.7%
Total nursing turnover
26.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 176 beds and averages 158.7 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.13 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.71 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-14)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2647910Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement medication pass guidelines for safe medication administration for one resident (R701) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include:Review of Intake 2647910 revealed an allegation that R701, who was not diabetic and did not have physician orders to receive insulin, had been administered an injection of 12 units of insulin on 09/09/25.A review of the facility record revealed R701 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia and Congestive Heart Failure. It was noted R701 did not have a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus. R701 was discharged from the facility on 09/18/25 per family request.On 10/22/25 at 11:57 AM, Unit Manager (UM) B was interviewed in their office. UM B reported they did recall the reported incident and indicated on 09/09/25 around lunch time Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A came to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (R128) resident of eight residents reviewed for bathing, was provided with a choice of having a shower rather than a bed bath. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R128 revealed an admission date of 04/18/25 with diagnoses including Rhabdomyolysis (skeletal muscle breakdown causing muscle pain and weakness) and Unstageable Left Hip and Right Heel Pressure Ulcers. R128's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 indicated intact cognition. On 05/13/25 at 12:50 PM, R128 was interviewed in their room. R128's hair appeared disheveled and oily. The resident was asked if they were receiving showers and they stated I'm dying for a shower, I haven't had one since I've been here. When questioned further R128 indicated they had been taken to the shower room and given a shower while laying on a shower bed a couple times and had otherwise received bed baths in their room. R128 was asked if they were given a choice of having a bed bath or a shower and they stated No, they just told…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, homelike environment in one room on [NAME] (H203). Findings include: On 5/12/25 at 10:20 AM, room H203 was observed with multiple, bright colored orange [NAME] on the floor next to a chair. On 5/13/25 at 8:39 AM, room H203 was observed again with the same orange [NAME] on the floor next to the chair. On 5/13/25 at 2:58 PM, room H203 remained in the same condition with the orange [NAME] in the same place in the resident's room on the floor. At this time the [NAME] appeared to be darker in color. On 5/14/25 at 2:29 PM, the House Keeping Manager was asked the facility's expectations with the cleaning of the resident's room. The manager explained the floors are a part of the routine/daily clearing. The housekeeper's procedure is to move furniture or items out of the way to ensure the floors are cleaned properly. A review of the facility's policy titled, Maintaining Resident Rooms Purpose dated 1/6/22 noted,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply ace wraps per physician orders for one resident (R24) out of one reviewed for physician orders. Findings include: A review of the medical record revealed R24 admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses, Urinary Tract Infection and Mood Disturbance. A review of the minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 3/15 indicating an impaired cognition. R24 also required assistance with bed mobility and transfers. A review of physician orders revealed the following, Order: Ace wraps to bilateral extremities: On in morning, off at night. On 5/12/2025 at 10:30 AM, R24 was observed in their bed. R24 stated they needed to be pulled up in bed and were looking for their call light. R24 was not observed to be wearing any ace wraps to their bilateral extremities. On 5/14/2025 at 9:54 AM, R24 was observed in bed with no ace wraps on bilateral extremities. R24 reported they have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00150202. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to knock and announce themself prior to entering a room for one sampled resident (R803) of three reviewed for falls, resulting in a fall with a head injury. Findings include: A review of an Intake noted on 1/28/25 at 3:30 AM, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) did not announce their presence by knocking and opened the door and hit R803's walker which caused R803 to fall and hit their head on the furniture. On 2/18/25 at 2:09 PM, CNA A was asked about the incident. CNA A explained they were in the day room when they heard a call light start to ring, they went to the panel to see which room it was. CNA A confirmed she did not knock before she entered R803's room because, when a call light is ringing (activated) it indicates the resident is waiting for us to come in and help. CNA A explained that R803 had to be directly behind the door when she entered, because she heard the door hit the walker…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00147284. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions, assess and monitor one resident (R901) following a fall, out of three residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: A review of Intake: MI00147284 revealed the following, .Complainant states [they] received a call on 09/28/2024 at approximately 5:44PM from an unknown female 1st shift nurse informing [them] that she found the resident on the floor in [their] room .Complainant states 3 hours later, [they] got a call from a 2nd shift nurse (unknown female), informing [them] she found the resident unresponsive on the floor of her room .Complainant states [they] went to the facility on [DATE] and was told the residents chart shows that neuro-checks (Neurological exam used to assess a patient) were completed but they didn't take any fall precautions because they can't predict when or if the resident would fall again A review of R901's medical records revealed the resident was initially…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY R65 On 4/10/24 at 12:45 PM, R65's was asked about the food at the facility. R65 stated, explained they were not happy with dessert selection and how it was not real dessert. R65 continued and explained, they are being served five grapes, flavored gelatin, pineapple, when we use to get brownies or pie. R89 On 4/10/24 at 12:59 PM, R89 was asked about the food at the facility. R89 stated, I have been sick two times this week with diarrhea because of something I ate. A review of pictures from R89's phone noted, January 29th and 24th, 2024. One of the pictures noted a piece of meatloaf that was pink in the middle indication undercooked. R89 stated, I sent it back and the next one they brought was the same color. R117 On 4/10/24 at 1:10 PM, R117 was asked about the food and stated, The food is horrible. This citation pertains to Intake MI00142742. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food in a palatable manner and preferred temperature for three residents (R65, R89, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 4/10/24 between 8:45 AM-9:20 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen, the following items were observed: There were 2 hand sinks in the kitchen with no paper towels available and the one hand sink that did have paper towels was blocked by a tall rack of dishware. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 6-301.12 Hand Drying Provision, Each handwashing sink or group of adjacent handwashing sinks shall be provided with: (A) Individual, disposable towels; According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 5-205.11 Using a Handwashing Sink, 1. (A) A HANDWASHING SINK shall be maintained so that it is accessible at all times for EMPLOYEE use. Pf In the walk-in cooler, there was an opened 1 gallon container of honey mustard with a use-by date of 4/1, an opened, undated 1 gallon container of ranch dressing, an opened, undated 1 gallon container of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide visual privacy during patient care and or obtain consent for care in a public area for one resident (R114) of one reviewed for personal privacy. Findings include: On 04/10/24 at 4:25 PM, R114 was asked questions about the their location, date, and situation and provided answers unrelated to the questions. On 04/11/24 at 1:50 PM, R114 was observed to be in the day area, with seven other residents. R114 was seated at a table with two other residents. R114 was dressed in long sleeves, pants, non slip socks and a baseball style cap. R114 was approached by a female who identified themselves as a physician (Staff C). The physician attempted to identify the resident to verify their name and the resident replied with a different name. The physician exited the day room and asked staff to confirm this was R114. On the way back to the resident the physician called the resident by name and R114 answered. A certified nurse assistant also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation refers to Intake MI00142742. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a weight was obtained upon admission for one resident (R448) of two reviewed for nutrition, resulting in the potential for unidentified weight loss. Findings include: On 04/12/24 at 2:17 PM, a representative of R448 reported R448 had not been assisted to eat, not provided fluids consistently and had weight loss. The representative reported R448 was transferred to another facility related to care concerns. The representative reported R448 had weighed 150 pounds prior to hospitalization and was down to 130 pounds when received at the nursing home. R448 confirmed the concern for weight loss and meal assistance. A review of the record for R448 revealed: R448 was admitted in the facility on 01/28/24 and discharged to another facility on 01/31/24. Diagnoses included Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Need for assistance with personal care and Muscle weakness. A review if the care plan indicated: Feeding: I need the meal tray set up for me. I may need to be encouraged to eat my…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 9 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication dispensing pens were dated when opened in two of four medication carts resulting in the potential for the decreased efficacy of the medications. Findings include: On 04/12/24 at 8:24 AM, an open Ozempic pen in the [NAME] B medication cart was not dated. On 04/12/24 at 8:43 AM, in the medication cart for the [NAME] 100 unit, a lantus insulin pen and a Novolog insulin pen (for R10) were not dated when opened and a novolog (for R5) was dated 02/28/24. On 04/12/24 at 2:25 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported insulin should be dated when opened and a sticker should be in place on the pen. On 4/12/24 at 1:59 PM, medication cart B on the Charlevoix unit of the facility was inspected and revealed that resident identifying information was not labled on one inhaler. Unidentified nurse D who was administering medications on the unit to residents, was interviewed regarding labeling of inhalers and stated, Some inhalers are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve food at a palatable temperature for five (R16, R65, R89, R230, R231) of 24 sampled residents resulting in resident dissatisfaction with meals. Findings Include: On 1/23/23 at 10:36 AM, R16 reported the food is usually too cold and that this was the case with that days breakfast. On 1/25/23 at 11:25 PM, R16 reported that the breakfast was too cold today. Review of the facility record for R16 revealed an admission date of 10/23/22 with diagnoses including right lower extremity fracture and muscle weakness. R16's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMs) score is 13 indicating intact cognitive functioning. R16 was able to articulate their concerns and preferences clearly. On 1/23/23 at 10:52 AM, R89 reported the food is often too cold and it comes later than their preferred time. On 1/24/23 at 9:20 AM, R89 reported that the lunch and dinner from 1/23/23 were both too cold. Review of the facility record for R89 revealed an admission date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 1/23/23 between 8:30 AM-9:15 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen with Dietary Manager (DM) F, the following items were observed: The handwashing sink located next to the clean side of the dish machine was observed with no hand soap or paper towels, and there was no handwashing signage. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 6-301.14 Handwashing Signage, A sign or poster that notifies food employees to wash their hands shall be provided at all handwashing sinks used by food employees and shall be clearly visible to food employees. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 6-301.11 Handwashing Cleanser, Availability, Each handwashing sink or group of 2 adjacent handwashing sinks shall be provided with a supply of hand cleaning liquid, powder, or bar soap. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 6-301.12 Hand Drying Provision, Each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the bedside table was in reach for one of one resident (R98) reviewed for hydration, resulting in water not being within reach of the resident. Findings include: On 1/24/23 at 9:55 AM, R98 was observed in their room in the bed. R98's daughter was also observed in the room. R98's face was observed with a bruise and when asked was the cause R98 and the daughter stated, R98 fell out of bed. During the interview R98 stated, They have this matt next to the bed and my table is over there (not within reach). R98's bed was observed with the left side against the wall and the right side open to the room. R98 has right side weakness and is unable to use their right side to reach for items. R98 stated, Sometimes I want water and I can't reach it and no one is to be found to help me. On 1/25/23 at 8:54 AM, R98 was observed in be asleep. R98's fall mattress was observed on the right/open side of the bed. The bedside table was observed behind…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement fall interventions per the plan of care for one sampled resident (R1) out of two residents reviewed for care plan interventions resulting in, the potential for the resident to sustain another fall with injury. Findings include: On 01/23/23 at 10:10 AM, R1 was observed in their bed which was not in the lowest position. A fall mattress was observed lying against the wall away from the resident's bed. R1 was also observed to have a cast on their right arm. Attempts to interview R1 were to no avail as the resident appeared confused. A review of R1's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia, Diabetes and Muscle Weakness. A review of R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15/15 indicating an intact cognition, and required bed mobility, transfers and bathing. Further review of R1's medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to update a care plan following a fall for one resident (R65) of two residents reviewed for care plan interventions, resulting in the potential for continued falls and injury. Findings include: On 1/23/23 at 9:02 AM, during an initial tour of the facility R65 was interviewed regarding any falls they had at the facility and indicated that they had a fall approximately two weeks ago which resulted in a skin tear. On 1/23/23 at 9:30 AM, a review of R65's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the following progress note dated, 1/15/23 3:31 PM, Resident observed in room lying on floor. Patient stated ' I was trying to get my banana and I fell'. Resident has 3 skin tears to the right forearm, wrist, and hand. No complaints of pain, resident's son was notified. Vitals T- 97.9, HR- 79, BP-106/74, O2- 93%. Doctor was notified . On 1/25/23 at 10:15 AM, a review of R65's fall care plan revealed that a new fall intervention had not been added to R65's care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one sampled resident (R114) of eight residents reviewed for falls, resulting in the resident sustaining a fall while in the shower. Findings include: On 1/24/23 at 1:28 PM, during a confidential resident council meeting, R114 explained that they had sustained a fall while being provided a shower by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA B). R114 explained that CNA B told them to stand up and hold onto the grab bar, so that R114 could wash their own buttocks however, R114 explained that they told CNA B that they would fall, and that CNA B told them to stand up anyway. R114 explained that as a result, they fell to the shower room floor and landed on their buttocks. R114 also explained that while in the process of attempting to clean their buttocks, CNA B was not standing by to assist them. A review of R114's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on 9/8/22 with diagnoses that included; wedge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder) was removed timely for one resident (R97) of one reviewed for urinary catheters resulting the potential for infection and accidents. Findings include: On 01/23/23 at 4:52 PM, R97 was observed to be dressed and seated in a wheelchair in their room with a visitor. The visitor reported that R97 was to be discharged the next day and reported concerns about the resident's falls and the urinary catheter. The visitor reported the urinary catheter had just been removed the day before (01/22/23) and they had understood the catheter was to be removed after R97 arrived at the facility from the hospital (01/8/23). On 01/24/23 at 7:56 AM, R97 was observed to dressed and in a wheelchair in the doorway of their room talking with staff. A review of the record for R97 revealed and admission into the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 12/27/22 to the hospital. R97 was readmitted into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-25 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to display current nurse staffing information on a daily basis, affecting all residents and visitors in the facility, resulting in staffing information not being readily available to residents and visitors. Findings include: During the duration of the survey (1/23/23-1/25/23) nurse staffing information was not observed to be posted in the facility. On 1/24/23 at 1:55 PM, Staff Coordinator D was interviewed regarding nurse staffing information and indicated that they were never trained on how to do Nurse staffing postings. On 1/24/22 at 2:02 PM, nurse staffing information was requested from the facility Administrator (NHA). The NHA indicated that the facility did not have any nurse staffing information and stated, Staffing hours should be posted daily. On 1/24/22 at 3:30 PM, a facility policy regarding nurse staffing postings was requested and the NHA indicated that the facility did not have a policy regarding this.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
POMEROY DELAWARE INVESTMENTS #2 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST72%since 05/01/2009
BARDEN, ENIDIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST28%since 01/01/2010
POMEROY, KEITHIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 01/01/2004
ZIEMAN, LORIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/02/2011

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.2M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 40%Medicare 17%Other / private 43%

This home reported $3.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$400per resident / day
operating cost
$12,161per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$390per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235484. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next