Grand Traverse Pavilions
1000 Pavilions Circle, Traverse City, MI 49684 · Government - County · 240 certified beds · (231) 932-3163 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603) — most recent Jun 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 7 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (65) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $157,954 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-15)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.9% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.1% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.4% | 4.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.2% | 3.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.3% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.0% | 19.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.8% | 5.1% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.7% | 20.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.5% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.5% | 1.1% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.2% | 79.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.5% | 24.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.3% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.20 | 1.84 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.09 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
59.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 244 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 63.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 156 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 59.0%CMS range 54.1–66.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 7.1–14.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 63.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 45.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 61.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 4.8–10.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.74 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
65 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This pertains to intakes 2687925 and 2741873.Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and/or implement appropriate interventions to prevent falls for three Residents (#1, #3, & #5) of three residents reviewed for falls, resulting in Resident #3 sustaining a right hip fracture which required hospitalization and surgical intervention.Findings include:Resident #3 (R3)A review of a fall report dated 12/9/25, at 5:03 am, indicated R3 fell in the bathroom. The incident description indicated . CNA heard loud sound from room and when he went into room, he observed the resident on the floor in the bathroom. Resident Description: Resident does not remember what happened but thinks she messed up her footing and slipped on the floor. She stated she did not look (sic) consciousness but did hit her head. Other Info: Patient did not have proper footwear on and told CNA she was okay to be left alone before sitting down onto the toilet. Pt (patient) believes she lost…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficient practice pertains to Intake 2641153.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to effectively monitor, report, and respond to a change in condition for one Resident (#1) of three residents reviewed for quality of care. This deficient practice resulted in Resident #1 receiving delayed medical treatment leading to hospitalization and subsequent death.Findings include:Resident #1 (R1)Review of R1's Hospital Transfer Form, dated 10/10/25 at 7:16 PM, read, in part: .Reason(s) for transfer: hypoxic. BP [blood pressure] 158/88. HR [heart rate] 121. RR [Respiratory Rate]: 31. O2 Sat [Oxygen Saturation] 85% .Review of the Emergency Medical Service (EMS) Transfer form, dated 10/10/25 at 10:01 AM, read, in part: .Upon arrival.[R1] has visible labored breathing.and tachypnea. Upon auscultation, inspiratory and expiratory wheezing was present in all fields, as well as crackles.Review of Discharge Documents from an acute care hospital dated 10/13/25 at 6:11 PM, read, in part: [R1].presents to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-06-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent the development and progression of two stage 4 pressure ulcers for one resident (Resident #68) out of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcer development. This deficient practice resulted in Resident #68 experiencing severe pain during dressing changes and subsequently required wound debridement and antibiotics. Findings include: Resident #68 (R68) On 6/10/25 at 2:00 PM, an observation was made of R68 sitting up in his wheelchair eating lunch. R68 was asked if they had a pressure sore on their bottom and replied, Yes. Review of R68's progress note, dated 3/12/25 at 5:49 PM, read in part, A DTI (deep tissue injury) was observed to residents scrotum measuring 1.1 x 0.7 cm (centimeters) .Resident was observed to be sitting on the tubing from his wound vac. Review of R68's wound assessment, dated 3/12/25, revealed the following: Pressure - Medical Device Related Pressure Injury - Deep Tissue Injury, Body Location: Scrotum. New -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management as prescribed by the physician for one Resident (#431) of two residents reviewed for pain. This deficient practice resulted in unrelieved pain and required Resident #431 to be subsequently transfer to the emergency department (ED). Findings include: Resident #431 (R431) Review of R431's EMR revealed initial admission to the facility on 6/4/25 with diagnoses including fracture of the left acetabulum (a break in the socket portion of the hip joint), fracture of the left ulna (a break in one of the two bones of the forearm), fracture of the left tibia (a break in the large bone in the lower leg), displaced fracture of the left acromial process (a break in the bony projection of the shoulder blade), and fractures of facial bones. ). Review of R431's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/10/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicative of intact cognition. On 6/10/25 at 12:20 PM, R431 was observed in his room standing at a platform walker with his left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-10-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficiency pertains to Intake MI00147134. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely notification to the physician for one Resident (#4) of three residents reviewed for a change in condition. This deficient practice resulted in a delay in medical treatment and subsequent death for Resident #4. Findings include: Resident #4 (R4): Review of R4's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stroke, anemia (a condition in which the blood doesn't have enough healthy red blood cells), and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (a condition in which the stomach contents move up into the esophagus). Review of R4's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicative of intact cognition. Review of a progress note written by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) G on [DATE] at 4:01 AM read, in part: CNA [certified nursing assistant] staff alerted this writer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-10-16 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficiency pertains to Intake MI00147235. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely laboratory services were provided per physician's orders for one Resident #1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for laboratory services. This deficient practice resulted in extreme elevation of blood glucose levels requiring R1 to be hospitalized . Findings include: Resident #1 (R1) Review of R1's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 1/18/22 with diagnoses including dementia, type two diabetes with hyperglycemia (high blood glucose levels), and cognitive communication deficit. Review of R1's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Intake MI00147235 read, in part: .On or about July 1, 2024, the facility's doctor [Medical Director (MD) K] discontinued [R1]'s diabetes medication. [R1] had been taking diabetes medication(s)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00145621. This citation has two parts: A and B. A. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate, timely assessments and physician/provider notification for a change in condition for one Resident (#173) of three residents reviewed for death, resulting in actual harm when R173 became unresponsive and ultimately expiring in the facility. Findings include: Resident #173 (R173) R173 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure (CHF), atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm), coronary artery disease (CAD) S/P (status-post) heart catheterization, transient ischemic attack (ministroke) and acute kidney injury. Review of R173's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], revealed R173 expired in the facility on [DATE]. Review of R173's Medical Certificate of Death, revealed the Resident expired on [DATE] at 1:59 p.m., cause of death was heart failure. Review of R173's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2726722.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to treat one Resident (#2) with dignity and respect out of three residents reviewed for resident rights. This deficient practice resulted in Resident #2 experiencing emotional distress and feelings of intimidation.Findings include:Resident # 2 (R2)A review of R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) indicated R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis including depression. R2 was noted to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, indicating normal thinking.On 2/23/26 at 10:42 AM, R2 was observed sitting in his recliner with portable cooling unit, and fan with ice filled tub behind it. Thermostat in room indicated it was 76 degrees in the room.During an initial interview on 2/23/26 at 10:43 AM, R2 stated the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and two maintenance guys came to his room on the morning of 1/26/26. R2 stated the three men did not knock prior to entering the room. R2 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake 2734782Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow resident choices for one Resident (#7) of three residents reviewed. This deficient practice resulted in feelings of hopelessness and frustration.Findings include:Resident #7 (R7)Review of R7's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on 2/17/26 with diagnosis including aftercare following joint replacement surgery. R7 was noted self-responsible for his medical and financial decisions.An interview was conducted with R7 on 2/23/26 at 11:01 a.m. R7 stated that he has been feeling very frustrated since his admission, I wake up between 6:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. I put on my call light to get dressed and ready for the day. Over the weekend, they did not get me up and dressed until 9:00-9:30 a.m. The staff came in and told me I had to wait because they don't get people up that early, or I wasn't a priority for them to get up. I even missed my shower today because of waiting. Also, I had an accident over the weekend and soiled myself because of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficient practice pertains to Intake 2641153.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary oxygen therapy as prescribed by a physician for one Resident (#1) of three Residents reviewed for respiratory services.Findings include:Resident #1 (R1)Review of R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), disorders of the diaphragm (a major muscle used in respiration), and history of a malignant neoplasm (cancerous tumor) of the lung. Review of R1's St. Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) Examination, dated 10/8/25, revealed a score of 19, indicative of dementia.Review of Intake 2641153 submitted to the State Agency (SA) on 10/13/25 read, in part: .On 10/7/25, [facility] staff transported [R1] to her orthopedic doctor's appointment. [R1's] daughter, [Family Member (FM) B], accompanied [R1]. [The facility] provided one oxygen tank .During the appointment, [R1]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to meet the needs of three sampled Residents (R9, R169 and R430), and eight Residents in a confidential group interview within the facility population of 181 Residents. This deficient practice resulted in actual and potential avoidable episodes of incontinence, frustration and helplessness with call lights going unanswered and needs not being addressed. Findings include: A review of the Resident Council minutes included: - 2/20/25 Discussion regarding call lights being answered in a timely manner . The time seems to be worse at night and early morning . - 3/20/25 Discussion regarding call lights being answered in a timely manner . There were a few concerns about call light times . - 4/17/25 Discussion regarding call lights being answered in a timely manner . When I push mine I have to wait and wait, a good 5 or more minutes during the day . - 5/22/25 Discussion regarding call lights being answered in a timely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen, at 11:47 AM on 6/10/25, and interview with Dietary Manager (DM) R found that the plastic bag covering the mixer means it is clean. When asked how often the mixer gets used, DM R stated it gets used four to five times a week. Observation of the large mixer found an accumulation of white debris stuck on the under arm of the unit. During the initial tour of the kitchen, at 11:49 AM on 6/10/25, observation of the inside of the blue ice scoop holder found black debris in the bottom corner of the holder. During the initial tour of the kitchen, at 11:50 AM on 6/10/25, observation of two clean utensil bins, in the back prep area, found mechanical scoops and spoons stored in an accumulation of crumb debris. Further observation of two pull out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practice statements. DPS A Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an active and ongoing plan for reducing the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP). This deficient practice has the increased potential to result in waterborne pathogens to exist and spread in the facility's plumbing system and an increased risk of respiratory infection among any or all the residents in the facility. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen pantry's, starting at 12:31 PM on 6/10/25, found the following areas with unused water lines protruding from the wall: Birch Pantry, Cherry Pantry, Dogwood Pantry, and Maple Pantry. During a tour of the Birch Hall soiled utility room, at 9:33 AM on 6/11/25, an interview with Environmental Services Assistant Director (ESAD) Q, found that staff should be using the hopper to clean linen before sending it to laundry. Observation of the hopper found discolored water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
On 6/11/25, the following observations were made of the dining rooms: Elm Dining Hall: At 12:25 p.m., 25 Residents were observed sitting in the dining room without drinks. Three staff members were observed at 12:30 p.m. when the meal cart was delivered attempting to pass out meals to residents. Dogwood Dining Hall: At 12:20 p.m., six residents were observed in the dining room without drinks. At 12:30 p.m., 10 residents were observed in the dining hall without drinks. The meal cart was delivered at 12:44 p.m. with one staff member assisting residents with their meals. Cherry Dining Hall: At 12:40 p.m., six residents were observed in the dining room without drinks. At 12:45 p.m. nine residents were observed in the dining room without drinks. At 12:50 p.m., 14 residents were observed in the dining room without drinks. At 12:58 p.m., the meal cart was delivered with one staff member assisting residents with their meals. Birch Dining Hall: At 12:32 p.m., one resident was observed in the dining room without a drink. At 12:45 p.m., six residents were observed in the dining room without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve grievances for three Residents (C3, C7, & #66) of nine residents reviewed for the facility's grievance and resolution process. Findings include: On 6/11/25 at 11:05 AM, a confidential group meeting was held with eight interested residents. The residents in attendance stated they were not happy with the grievance process. One confidential resident (C3) said, You voice concerns, but it seems to take a while until they let you know an answer. Another confidential resident (C7) stated, Most of the time we don't hear any solutions or any report back on our concerns. Two residents in this meeting stated they had concerns with missing items. Both residents stated they had told staff and never had resolution. A review of the previous Resident Council minutes revealed many concerns had been brought up without resolution. Examples include: 1/16/25 RESIDENT COUNCIL MEETING The minutes included: The floor was opened for residents to make comments, suggestions, concerns, and or ask questions. The minutes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were safely secured and stored in three of six medication carts reviewed for medication storage and properly dispose of medications in one of six medication carts reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: During an environmental tour on the Maple Unit with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on [DATE] at 3:36 PM, five loose medications were found between the seat cushions on the left side of a chair in the hallway. The medications consisted of a semicircular, orange-colored tablet, a pink and turquoise capsule, an elongated oval tablet, and two circular orange tablets. The NHA did not provide an explanation for the medications found in an unsecured and public location accessible to residents in the facility. The NHA said he would follow up with the nurse manager on the unit. Five medication carts were reviewed on [DATE] at 1:02 PM which included three medication carts (Green, Violet, and Orange) on the Maple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent resident to resident physical abuse resulting in harm from the reasonable person perspective, for three Residents (R149, R155, and R158) of three residents reviewed for abuse prevention. Findings include: A review of R158's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on 3/11/25 and diagnoses including dementia with psychotic disturbance. R158's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/17/25, showed severe cognitive impairment, was rarely understood, showed signs of physical and verbal behaviors 1-3 days, ambulated independently and resided in the secure (locked) memory care unit. An observation on 6/10/25 at 12:32 p.m. revealed R158 in the main dining hall of the memory care unit. R158 was observed becoming confrontational with other residents while waiting for the lunch meal service to arrive. R158 was observed getting very close to residents sitting at the table, attempting to take various drinks from them and then becoming upset. One staff member was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 48 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide applicable bed hold policy information and/or written transfer notifications to two Residents (#154 and #68) of four residents reviewed for transfer and discharge process. Findings include: Resident #154 (R154) The medical record for R154 revealed a census record on 2/24/25 stating R154 was sent out to the hospital. The medical record did not have a record that a written notification of discharge or explanation of the bed hold policy was sent to the resident or the responsible party. On 6/11/25 at approximately 12:00 PM, a request was made to the Director of Nursing (DON) for documentation of any written notification of hospital transfers and bed hold policy notifications for R154 for all hospitalizations over the past six months. At 2:36 PM that same day, an email follow up was sent to the DON for the transfer documents for R154. While a written notification of transfer was presented for a December transfer, the 2/24/25 documents were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise care plan interventions for one Resident (R155) of five residents reviewed for behavior care planning. Findings include: Review of R155's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on 9/16/24 with diagnosis including Alzheimer's Disease. R155 was not responsible for her medical and financial decisions. R155 had a recent resident to resident altercation on 6/6/25. Review of R155's Care Plans read, in part, .Modify environment: (redirect others away from my room. If I allow it, place [Name Brand] stop/gate on my room door when I am not in it. I often remove this, but at times it can reassure me) date initiated: 4/2/25 . On 6/10/25 at approximately 11:50 a.m., R155's room was observed by this Surveyor. R155 was not located in her room, and a stop sign appeared to be placed on a fire exit door adjacent to R155's room. The Director of Nursing provided an incident report for R155 on 6/12/25. There was one incident which was provided which occurred on 6/4/24 at approximately 3:40 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medication per physician order for one resident (Resident #2) of 35 residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: Resident #2 (R2) Review of R2's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 6/13/16 with diagnoses including anemia, depression, diabetes mellitus, nausea, and hypertension. Review of R2's progress note, dated 3/10/25 at 11:19 PM, read in part, Resident received wrong dose of medication .Resident aware of medication error. Review of facility incident and accident report, dated 3/10/25, read in part, .Incident description .Floor nurse gave resident wrong dose of medication. Resident is ordered 0.5mg (milligrams) of (name brand for lorazepam, a controlled substance commonly used to treat anxiety) and was given 3.0mg .Level of consciousness: Lethargic (drowsy) .Mental status: Resident drowsy due to (name brand for lorazepam) being administered 30 minutes prior . Review of R2's physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly supervise one Resident (#121) of two residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living during (ADL) care. This deficient practice resulted in a fall with injury. Resident #121 (R121) On 6/10/25 at 12:24 p.m., R121 was observed sitting in the main dining hall waiting for her meal tray. R121 was noted to have a large purple bruise under her left eye and a dark red/purple bruise under her left nostril. An attempted interview was conducted with R121 who was not able to respond appropriately. Review of R121's Progress Notes read, in part, 6/6/25: (R121) is being seen today to follow up on a witnessed fall that occurred this morning at 6:06 a.m. in the member's room while CNA (Certified Nursing Aide) was dressing her for the day. She (CNA) had turned her back for a moment and the resident fell forward from a seated position on her bed and struck the left side of her head on the floor She is lying in her bed at this time and a large hematoma to the left forehead with ecchymosis to the left eye is noted. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary storage and cleaning of respiratory equipment for two Residents (#430 and #433) of two residents reviewed for respiratory services. Findings include: Resident #430 (R430) Review of R430's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 5/27/25 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), moderate persistent asthma, and chronic respiratory failure. Review of R430's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/2/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicative of intact cognition. On 6/10/25 at 11:42 AM, oxygen tubing was observed connected to a concentrator next to R430's bed and coiled up on the floor. No storage bag was noted. R430 verified she required supplemental oxygen at night and did not recall ever having a storage bag for the tubing. Review of R430's EMR revealed a physician's order, initiated 5/30/25, which read: Continuous Oxygen 2 L (liters)/min (minute) via NC [nasal cannula] at night and PRN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) triggers and develop individualized care plan interventions to mitigate trauma triggers for one Resident (#79) of one resident reviewed for trauma-informed care. Findings include: Resident #79 (R79) R79 was admitted to the facility 1/9/24 with diagnoses including PTSD. The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) contained a psychiatric follow up report dated 5/15/25 that read, in part: .significant history of psychiatric trauma from an abusive relationship . The report did not include trauma triggers. A nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] contained an initial trauma screening. The portion of the admission assessment; Section AS_15. Screening Trauma Informed Care documented the following questions and responses: 1. Have you faced a traumatic event or experience in the past? The answer was yes. 2. Recently, have you thought about the event(s) or experience when you did not want to? The answer was documented as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure availability of prescribed medications for one Resident (#431) of six residents reviewed for pharmacy services. Findings include: Resident #431 (R431) Review of R431's EMR revealed initial admission to the facility on 6/4/25 with diagnoses including fracture of the left acetabulum (a break in the socket portion of the hip joint), fracture of the left ulna (a break in one of the two bones of the forearm), fracture of the left tibia (a break in the large bone in the lower leg), displaced fracture of the left acromial process (a break in the bony projection of the shoulder blade), and fractures of facial bones. ). Review of R431's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/10/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicative of intact cognition. On 6/10/25 at 12:20 PM, R431 was observed in his room standing at a platform walker with his left leg immobilized. An interview was conducted with R431 regarding his level of satisfaction with care at the facility. R431 stated he was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR's) were addressed by the attending physician and maintained in the clinical record for two Residents (#45 & #79) of five residents reviewed for MRR. Findings include: Resident #45 (R45) R45 was admitted to the facility 9/8/23. A review of physician's orders in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R45 had an order for diclofenac (a pain medication) and quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication for mental health conditions). The EMR of R45 was reviewed for MRR on 6/11/25. No MRR's were found in the EMR, and a request was made to the Director of Nursing (DON) on 6/11/2025 at 5:37 PM to provide the MRR's for R45. MRR's were provided by the DON on 6/12/25 at 8:47 AM. Review of the MRR's revealed the pharmacist made requests and recommendations to R45's physician for dosage clarification of diclofenac on 1/24/25 and 3/19/25. The pharmacist documented in the MRR's for diclofenac on 1/24/25 and 3/19/25 both of which, read in part: . Resident has an order for diclofenac gel twice daily.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adaptive dining equipment for two Residents (#80 and #111) of three residents reviewed for adaptive dining equipment needs. This deficient practice resulted in increased difficulty with food consumption and independent eating. Findings include: Resident #80 (R80)/Resident #111 (R111) On 6/11/25 at approximately 9:00 AM, the breakfast meal was observed. R80 did not receive dycem (a non-slip material placed under the plate) to help secure his plate while eating. R80 did have special built up utensils for ease of gripping and feeding self. The breakfast tray card indicated R80 needed 1 each Nonslip Dycem. On 6/12/25 at 9:34 AM, the breakfast meal was observed. R80 did not receive dycem to help secure his plate while eating but did have special built up utensils to assist in feeding himself. During this same meal, R111 also did not receive non-slip dycem as indicated on his tray card. During an interview on 6/12/25 at approximately 9:35 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) CC stated R80 has not been using dycem…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an eligible resident was provided a pneumococcal vaccine as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for 1 Resident (#54) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: Resident #54 (R54) Review of R54's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 5/23/25 with diagnoses including fractured left ribs, anemia, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. R54 was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation. Review of R54's vaccination on the Michigan Care Improvement Registry (MICR), revealed the last dose of the pneumococcal was administered on 8/2/21. The status for eligible PCV20/PCV21/PPSV23 vaccination read, Overdue. Review of facility document for R54 titled, admission Consent Checklist, dated 5/16/25, read in part, .#9. Can we provide influenza vaccine, pneumococcal vaccine, tetanus and COVID-19 if due? Yes (marked) . Review of R54's EMR revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure eligible residents were provided a COVID-19 vaccine as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for 2 Residents (#54 & #433) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: Resident #54 (R54) Review of R54's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 5/16/25 with diagnoses including fractured left ribs, anemia, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. R54 admitted to the facility for rehabilitation. Review of R54's vaccination on the Michigan Care Improvement Registry (MICR), revealed the last dose of the COVID-19 was administered on 12/13/21. The status for eligible COVID-19 vaccination read, Overdue. Review of facility document for R54 titled, admission Consent Checklist, dated 5/16/25, read in part, .#9. Can we provide influenza vaccine, pneumococcal vaccine, tetanus and COVID-19 if due? Yes (marked) . Review of R54's EMR revealed a COVID-19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY MI00150655 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess bowel function for one Resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for bowel care/complaints of constipation. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for missed signs and symptoms of constipation and resulted in hospitalization. Findings include: Review of the complaint intake revealed the following, .Complainant states the resident came from the hospital after having knee replacement for rehab on [DATE]. Complainant states the resident started complaining about his stomach hurting, it was extended and that he was having trouble going to the bathroom .On [DATE] the complainant states .the resident told them his stomach hurt .staff put a blanket over him and did come back later to check on him. Staff found that he was cold and clammy. The resident was transported to [Hospital Name] .he would pass away, which he did on [DATE]. The death certificate states the resident died from ischemic colitis, septic shock and organ failure .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00150291. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from verbal abuse and neglect by facility staff for three Residents (#1, #2, #3) of five residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Findings include: Resident #1 (R1): Review of R1's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 1/10/25 with diagnoses including prosthetic joint infection and sepsis with septic shock. Review of R1's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/23/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7/15, indicative of severe cognitive impairment. Review of MDS Section GG (Functional Abilities and Goals) revealed R1 was dependent for both toileting hygiene and lower body dressing. Resident #2 (R2): Review of R2's EMR revealed initial admission to the facility on 1/31/25 with diagnoses including post-hemorrhagic anemia. Review of R2's MDS assessment, dated 2/6/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficiency pertains to Intake MI00148163. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide advanced written notice prior to a room change for one Resident (#2) of six residents reviewed for room changes. Findings include: Resident #2 (R2) Review of R2's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease and neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies (a condition which impacts a person's ability to think, learn, and remember). Review of R2's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicative of severe cognitive impairment. An anonymous complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) on 11/20/24 read, in part: [R2] was admitted [DATE] as a skilled, short term admit. In the evening, he wandered out of his room twice, he was confused. At the direction of [the Director of Nursing (DON)] he [R2] was moved to the locked Elm unit [secured…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes MI00149104 and MI00149112. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from mental and verbal abuse by facility staff for one Resident (#1) of four residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in feelings of fear, humiliation, and the potential for psychosocial harm. Findings include: Resident #1 (R1) Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a primary diagnosis of liver cell carcinoma. Review of the discharge MDS assessment, dated [DATE] revealed R1 was independent with bed mobility, sit to stand transfers, ambulation to 10 feet, and wheelchair use. Further review of R1's MDS assessments revealed the Resident was discharged to an acute care hospital on [DATE] and did not return. Review of R1's Clinical Admission progress note, dated [DATE], revealed R1 was his own decision-maker and was assessed as Alert & Oriented x 3 . able to understand and be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolatedProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficiency pertains to Intake MI00148163. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and operationalize policies and procedures to ensure the appropriate placement on a secured unit for one Resident (#2) of six residents reviewed for involuntary seclusion. Findings include: Resident #2 (R2) Review of R2's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease and neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies (a condition which impacts a person's ability to think, learn, and remember). Review of R2's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicative of severe cognitive impairment. Further review of MDS Section E (Behaviors) revealed R2 did not display any physical or verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others, did not reject care, and did not exhibit wandering behavior. An anonymous complaint submitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intakes MI00149113, MI00149014 and MI00148163. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the State Agency (SA) within the appropriate time frame for one Resident (#1) of four residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in the potential for continued abuse. Findings include: Review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI), submitted 12/13/2024 at 8:55 a.m., revealed the following: Incident Summary: Email received from unknown individual alleging that a staff member yelled at a patient [R1], pointed his finger in his face and told him 'You will not go outside until I say so.' Allegation states the patient [R1] said he was afraid and humiliated . The investigation substantiated the complaint . As a result of the complaint and the facility's investigation, the perpetrator [former Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A] is no longer employed at the facility . It was noted in review of the investigation documents, no date or time of the alleged incident was provided. During an interview on 1/9/2025 at 9:16 a.m., Assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00149014. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation of an allegation of verbal abuse for one Resident (#6) of four residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in the potential for unidentified and continued abuse. Findings include: Resident #6 (R6) Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/27/2024, revealed R6 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression and bipolar disease. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed R6 scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating the Resident was cognitively intact. During a confidential interview on 1/9/2025 at 8:52 a.m., Staff U reported a concern that an allegation of staff verbal abuse of a resident was never investigated. Staff U described an incident when R6 was called a derogatory name by a member of the housekeeping staff. Staff U stated on May 17, 2024, Staff T called R6 a butt head in a manner that was reported as demeaning.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This deficiency pertains to Intake MI00147235. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident representative was informed about medication changes for one Resident (#1) of 3 residents reviewed for medication review. Findings include: Resident #1 (R1) Review of R1's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 1/18/22 with diagnoses including dementia, type two diabetes with hyperglycemia (high blood glucose levels), and cognitive communication deficit. Review of R1's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, indicative of moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Intake MI00147235 read, in part: .On or about July 1, 2024, the facility's doctor [Medical Director (MD) K] discontinued [R1]'s diabetes medication. [R1] had been taking diabetes medication(s) for at least the prior 15-20 years. [Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) M] of [R1] had durable power of attorney, was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among any and all 164 residents of the facility. Findings include: On 9/16/24 at approximately 11:10 AM, kitchen staff were observed in the kitchen, near the dish washing area removing trays containing soiled dishes, utensils and uneaten food from wheeled Cambro insulated transport carts. These carts were returned to the kitchen with trays removed from residents' eating areas. Once the soiled trays, utensils and uneaten food were removed from the wheeled transport carts, the carts were relocated to an unused dining area west and adjacent to the kitchen. No cleaning of the carts had been conducted following the removal of the soiled trays and uneaten food. At approximately 11:35 AM Food Service Worker (FSW) B was observed filling a small bucket from a disinfectant dispenser in the kitchen and going to the unwashed carts in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that included development, monitoring, and evaluation of adverse events to correct quality deficiencies and maintain sustained compliance. This deficient had the potential to affect all 164 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 9/19/24 at 10:10 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN)/Staff Educator P who verified she oversaw the QAPI process. When asked if adverse events such as a death in the facility, were reviewed in QAPI. RN/Staff Educator P stated these events were discussed in Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) meetings but not in QAPI. RN/Staff Educator P verified she considered an unexpected death an adverse event but, It's just something we never really discussed [in QAPI]. RN/Staff Educator P was unable to explain how medical errors or adverse resident events were identified, analyzed, corrected, or monitored to ensure desired outcomes throughout the QAPI process. Review of facility policy titled, Quality…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-19 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Resident and/or Resident Representative in writing, the reason for transfer of four Residents (R1, R56, R149, R621) of five residents reviewed for facility initiated transfers. Findings include: Resident #56 (R56) During an interview on 9/16/24 at 12:20 PM, R56 stated he had been sent to the hospital during his stay at the facility. The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R56 revealed a transfer to the hospital on 6/24/24 with a readmission on [DATE]. No evidence of written notification for the transfer provided to R56 or their representative could be located in the medical record. During an interview on 9/19/24 at 11:17 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she did not believe a system was in place to send written transfer notifications to the resident and resident representative. She said, It looks like an opportunity for improvement. She further recommended checking with the social worker. During an interview on 9/19/24 at 11:25 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notification of the facility bed hold policy for two Residents and/or Resident Representatives (#621 and #149) of five residents reviewed for notice of bed hold policy. Findings include: Resident #621 (R621) Review of the R621's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following physician communication on 7/11/24 at 4:22 PM: .Send to [acute care hospital] for evaluation . Review of the facility census report confirmed R621 was hospitalized on [DATE]. On 9/19/24 at 11:17 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) who stated she was unaware if a bed hold policy was issued to R621 upon transfer. On 9/19/24 at 11:31 AM, an interview was conducted with Social Worker (Staff D) who verified a R621 was not issued a bed hold policy. Resident #149 (R149) Review of the EMR revealed R149 was hospitalized from [DATE] - 6/30/24. The EMR did not indicate a bed hold policy was issued to R149. On 9/19/24 at 11:31 AM, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for the use of psychotropic medications for one Resident (#136) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, resulting in the potential for unnecessary use of mood-altering drugs and decreased quality of life. Findings include: Resident #136 (R136) Review of R136's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/23/2024, revealed admission to the facility on 4/23/2024 with diagnoses including dementia with psychotic disturbance, depression and anxiety disorder. R136 was rated as having severely impaired cognition. Review of R136's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the following orders: Lorazepam (a controlled substance anti-anxiety medication) Oral Tablet 0.5 MG (milligram). Give 0.5 mg by mouth every 6 hours as needed for anxiety . Review of R136's care plan revealed the following: Focus: The resident uses psychotropic medications [related to] end of life, comfort measures . Date initiated: 4/25/2024. Goal: The resident will be/remain free of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply orthopedic braces per physician orders for two Residents (#104 and #155) out of five Residents reviewed for range of motion, positioning, and mobility. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for a reduction in range of motion and/or complications following cervical [neck] surgery. Findings include: Resident #155 (R155) Review of R155's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 8/13/24 with diagnoses including surgical aftercare following surgery on the nervous system, inflammatory reaction due to internal fixation device of the spine, and quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs due to spinal cord damage). Review of R155's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment, indicative of intact cognition. Review of a Neurosurgery Progress Note, dated 9/4/24, read, in part: .Cervical collar to be worn at all times .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement appropriate interventions to prevent unsafe wandering and elopement for three Residents (R132, R156, & R221) of three residents reviewed for elopement. This deficient practice resulted in continued unsafe supervision and an elopement from the locked memory care unit. Findings include: R132 Review of R132's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including dementia. R132's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3/15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. R132 was also noted on the 11/3/23 Elopement Evaluation to be at risk for elopement due to wandering. On 9/15/24 at 11:55 a.m., R132 was observed participating in an activity prior to lunch. R132 was observed in a seated position with no walker or wheelchair present near him. R132 ambulated to the lunchroom after the activity had concluded.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide oxygen services per standards of practice for one Resident (#83) out of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for hypoxia (oxygen deficiency), respiratory complications, and the potential for re-hospitalization. Findings include: Resident #83 (R83) Review of R83's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on 8/21/24 with diagnoses including pneumonia, shortness of breath, and sleep apnea (a sleep disorder in which breathing repeatedly stops and starts). Review of R83's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment, indicative of intact cognition. On 9/16/24 at 2:08 PM, R83 was observed sitting in a recliner in her room with an oxygen concentrator to her left. R83 did not have supplemental oxygen applied. When R83 was asked about her care satisfaction level, R83 stated, I would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Medication Regimen Reviews (MRRs) were addressed by the physician and maintained in the clinical records for two Residents (R61 and R91) of five residents reviewed for MRR. Findings include: Resident #61 (R61) Medication orders for R61 included three different antianxiety medications and an order for melatonin, a medication used for insomnia. The pharmacist MRR on 4/21/24 recommended the physician evaluate R61 to determine if the dosages of the antianxiety medications could be reduced. The report to the physician read, in part: .If you feel that no GDR (Gradual Dose Reduction) should be attempted, please document your reasoning for clinical contraindication at the bottom of this form or in your next progress note . The portion of the report for the physician's written response to the recommendation was blank, unsigned, and undated. Physician visit notes documented a visit on 5/10/24. The physician documentation did not include reasoning for declining the pharmacist's recommendation for GDR. The pharmacist MRR report…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation of targeted behaviors and use of non-pharmacological interventions prior to administration of as needed anti-anxiety medication for one Resident (#136) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, resulting in the potential for over-medication and decreased quality of life. Findings include: Resident #136 (R136) Review of R136's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/23/2024, revealed admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with psychotic disturbance, depression and anxiety disorder. Further review of the MDS revealed R136 has severely impaired cognition. Review of R136's June 2024 through September 2024 Medication Administration Records (MARs) revealed the following order: Lorazepam (a controlled anti-anxiety medication) Oral Tablet 0.5 MG (milligram). Give 0.5 mg by mouth every 6 hours as needed for anxiety . Further review of the MARs revealed R136 was administered as needed doses of lorazepam 0.5 mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely dental services were provided for three Residents (R49, R61, and R56) of three residents reviewed for dental services. Findings include: Resident #49 (R49) During an interview on 9/16/24 at 3:14 p.m., R49 said, I broke my tooth last month. R49 opened her mouth and pointed to the left upper part of the front of her mouth revealing what appeared to be a tooth fragment in the gum line. R49 said she did not know when she would be able to see the dentist. R49 admitted to a history of issues with dentition and said she has went to dental appointments with a dentist in the community but was waiting to see the dentist in the facility. A progress note in the medical record dated 8/16/24 documented, in part: .Resident had a tooth fall out today .Son has denied consent for inhouse services. Resident is still her own person and would like to consent for those services . A form Consent for Services that included dental services was signed by R49's son on 7/31/24 with a checkmark next to the box that read I wish to use the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow to evaluate and treat one resident (R119) of two residents reviewed for therapy services. This deficient practice caused R119 to be uncomfortable each day when she sat in her wheelchair. Findings include: On 9/16/24 at 12:52 PM, R119 was observed seated in a high back wheelchair with her legs elevated and fully extended. R119's feet were observed pushed up against the foot cradle. R119 stated, This chair is too long. It is uncomfortable. The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) was reviewed. On 8/7/2024 at 13:32 (1:32 PM) a progress note was written titled: Therapy Communication to Nursing and read, Note Text: Recommend OT (occupational therapy) eval and tx (treatment orders) to address positioning. The EMR also contained a physician order written on 8/8/24 which read, OT to evaluate and treat if indicated. During an interview on 09/18/24 at 4:50 PM, Physical Therapist (PT) N stated there should be an OT screen and evaluation, but PT N looked in the EMR for R119 and did not find these OT documents. PT N…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure collaboration and communication between the facility and hospice provider for one Resident (R137) of one resident reviewed for hospice services. This deficient practice resulted in gaps in communication for coordination of care. Findings include: Review of R137's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on 1/11/24 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and dysphagia. Review of R137's 6/26/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed he was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and had severely impaired cognition. R137 was admitted to the facility on hospice services and had a Designated Power of Attorney (DPOA) for medical and financial decisions. On 9/16/24 at 1:40 p.m. an interview was conducted with R137's DPOA, who stated there is a lack of communication between R137's hospice services and the facility. The DPOA stated, I know that they are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to 1) maintain sanitary equipment, 2) date mark potentially hazardous food, 3) and monitor cooler temperatures, resulting in the potential for contamination of equipment and potential for conditions for foodborne illness, affecting all 138 residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 9/11/23 at 12:10 PM, during an inspection of the kitchen, the dual check valve with an atmospheric port (a backflow prevention device commonly used in plumbing to prevent backflow of contaminated liquid into the domestic water supply), provided for the waste disposal submerged inlet, was observed to not have an air gap provided for the atmospheric port. According to the manufacturer's installation directions, it notes, It is important to install a discharge line downward from the vent to a floor drain, sump, or other safe place of disposal that will not result in property damage. A physical air gap must be maintained between the discharge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that promoted and enhanced resident dignity in 12 (Resident #80, #431, #44, #12, #36, #125, #84, #98, #16, #20, #97, and #72) of 13 residents reviewed for dignity related to dining experience, call light wait times, and staff assistance of resident needs, resulting in the likelihood of feelings of humiliation, embarrassment, and loss of self-worth, and a negative psychosocial outcome for the residents impacting their quality of life. Findings include: Resident #80: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #80 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included dementia, muscle weakness, anxiety, unsteadiness on feet, kidney disease, cognitive communication deficit, and abnormal weight loss. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #80, with a reference date of 10/27/22 revealed a Staff Assessment for Mental Status indicated Resident #80 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's accommodation of needs were met for 5 (Resident #81, # 68, #381,#34 and #96) out of 6 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs resulting in resident's inability to call for staff assistance with the potential for unmet care needs and a resident not receiving incontinence care products. Findings include: Resident #81 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #81, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included disorientation and repeated falls. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #81, with a reference date of 8/14/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident #81 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #81's Care Card revealed, .Toileting: Please check to ensure I am maintaining my hygiene. Provide Assist prn (as needed) . During an interview and observation on 9/11/23 at 3:29 PM, Resident #81…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was consistently provided with personal hygiene related to facial hair and overall cleanliness with daily ADL care for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #7, #381, #72, #33 and #67) reviewed for activities of daily living, resulting in unmet personal hygiene needs with the potential for isolation, psychosocial harm, skin breakdown, harboring infection, and decreased self-esteem. Findings include: Resident #33: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #33 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included dementia, depression, low back pain, anxiety, candidiasis (yeast infection), dysphagia (,(damage to the brain responsible for production and comprehension of speech), psychosis, pain, anemia, underweight, lumbrosacral neuritis (inflammation of the nerves along the spinal canal), and dermatitis (skin inflammation). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #33, with a reference date of 7/11/23 revealed a Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide food in a palatable and appetizing temperature for 4 residents (Resident #80, #74, #36, and #84) of 4 reviewed for food palatability resulting in dissatisfaction with meal service with the potential for decreased food acceptance and nutritional decline. Findings include: Review of Meal Times document provided on 9/12/23, revealed, .Breakfast: Dogwood - 9:00 - 9:15 AM .Lunch: Dogwood - 1:00 PM - 1:15 PM . During an observation on 09/12/23 at 09:17 AM, this writer observed the breakfast meal cart in the hallway. Residents #36, #62, #94, #44, #86, #431, #125, and #12 were seated in the center of the unit. Residents #94 and #62 were observed to have their breakfasts in front of them. Resident #12 received his breakfast at 09:37 AM. Residents #36, #44, #431, and #125 had not received their breakfasts yet. Resident #44 was seated next to R#94, Resident #36 was seated next to Resident #62, and Resident #431 was seated next to R#86. In an interview on 09/12/23 at 09:24 AM, CNA ZZ reported the residents had not all had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY In an observation on 9/11/23 at 1:16 PM., noted 2 sit to stand lifts (lift that assist residents to stand and transfer) parked on the 400 unit near room [ROOM NUMBER]. The bases (where residents plant their feet) of the lifts were noted to be soiled with dust, debris and food crumbs. There were no sanitizing wipes near or attached to the lifts. In an observation on 9/11/23 at 3:09 PM., noted 2 sit to stands parked on the 400 unit near room [ROOM NUMBER]. The bases of the lifts were noted to be soiled with dust, debris and food crumbs. A dark brown dried smeared substance was noted on the knee area of one of the lifts. There were no sanitizing wipes near or attached to the lifts. In an observation 09/12/23 at 3:00 PM., noted 2 sit to stands parked on the 400 unit near room [ROOM NUMBER]. The bases (where residents plant their feet) of the lifts were noted to be soiled with dust, debris and food crumbs. A dark brown dried smeared substance was noted on the knee area. There were no sanitizing wipes near or attached…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to perform a resident assessment and obtain a physician order for the self administration of medication for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #81), reviewed for self administration of medication, resulting in the potential for the mismanagement of medication and adverse side effects. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #81, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included disorientation and repeated falls. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #81, with a reference date of 8/14/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated Resident #81 was cognitively intact. During an interview and observation on 9/11/23 at 3:29 PM, Resident #81 reported that she suffered from chronic dry eyes, and would frequently use eye drops. Resident #81 had a bottle of Systane eye drops on her tray table. Resident #81 reported that she was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and immediately report to the State Agency an allegation of staff to resident abuse for 1 residents (Resident #95) of 6 residents residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in the potential for allegations of abuse to go unreported, undetected and the potential for further abuse to continue and go unrecognized. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #95, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: chronic kidney disease. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #95, with a reference date of 8/24/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11/15 which indicated Resident #95 was mildly cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #95 Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed: On 6/25/2023 at 18:29 (EDT) CNA came up to med cart and informed this nurse that resident (Resident #95) had accused CNA of punching him (Resident #95). CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure and thoroughly investigate and protect residents after an allegation of staff to resident physical abuse was made by Resident #95, resulting in the alleged perpetrator not being immediately removed from direct resident care, and an allegation of physical abuse not being investigated, and the potential for future mistreatment and/or abuse to go undetected and investigated to protect a vulnerable population. Findings include: Resident #95 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #95, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: chronic kidney disease. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #95, with a reference date of 8/24/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11/15 which indicated Resident #95 was mildly cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #95 Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed: On 6/25/2023 at 18:29 (EDT) CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement resident comprehensive care plans for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #12, #86, and #33) reviewed for care planning, resulting in a lack of service for residents to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Resident #33: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #33 was a female with pertinent diagnoses which included dementia, depression, low back pain, anxiety, candidiasis (yeast infection), dysphagia (,(damage to the brain responsible for production and comprehension of speech), psychosis, pain, anemia, underweight, lumbrosacral neuritis (inflammation of the nerves along the spinal canal), and dermatitis (skin inflammation). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #33, with a reference date of 7/11/23 revealed a Staff Assessment for Mental Status was completed indicating Resident #33 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of current Care Plan for Resident #33, currently active focus, .I have an alteration in my…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to revise an individualized care plan to reflect current therapy recommendations for 1 (Resident #297) of 25 residents reviewed for care plan revision, resulting in the potential for staff to provide care that was not consistent with the needs of the resident. Findings include: Review of a current activities of daily living Care Plan intervention for Resident #297 on 9/12/2023 at 8:57 AM revealed staff were directed to use one person assistance with a Sara Steady for all transfers. Review of Resident #297's latest Therapy Communication to the interdisciplinary team, dated 9/1/2023, revealed therapy recommended staff use one person assistance with a front wheeled walker to transfer Resident #297. In an interview on 9/12/2023 at 2:45 PM, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) SS reported Resident #297's care card was updated on 9/3/2023 to reflect the Therapy Communication from 9/1/2023 but not the care plan. ADON SS reported Resident #297's care plan still directed staff to use the Sara Steady for transfers instead of directing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly assess and monitory a resident after a fall in 1 (Resident #297) of 5 residents reviewed for accidents and injuries, resulting in the potential for unnoticed and untreated head injury. Findings include: Review of a Face Sheet revealed Resident #297 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included dementia, cognitive communication deficit (difficulty communicating), and fall with hip fracture. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #297, with a reference date of 9/5/2023 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #297 was severely cognitively impaired. Further review of same MDS assessment revealed Resident #297 had been taking anticoagulant medication. Review of Resident #297's Physician Orders revealed an order for the anticoagulant medication Lovenox, ordered 8/16/2023 to continue until 9/8/2023. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor and ensure the resident safety 1 of 5 residents (Resident #96) reviewed for accidents and hazards, resulting in the potential for falls and injury. Findings include: According to the MDS dated [DATE], R96 scored 7/15 (cognitively impaired) on her BIMS, required limited assistance for transfers, walking in her room, and toileting. Her diagnoses included a recently fractured back from a fall. Review of R96's Care Plan reported she had an alteration in her ability to perform her ADLs independently and be independent with mobility related to age-related physical debility, history of falls, osteoporosis, impaired balance, times of incontinence and vertigo. She was at risk for injury from falls. Effective 2/15/2022 - Present. Her goal was to be clean, odor free, well groomed, and comfortably dressed with encouragement to participate as able. Interventions to meet this goal included assist me to the bathroom per protocol. Keep my call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a leg strap (a device that goes around a leg to comfortably secure a urinary drainage bag in place) was in place for 1 resident (R98) in 1 resident reviewed for urinary catheter care, resulting in pain and injury. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R98 scored 3/15 (severely cognitively impaired) on her BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status), and required extensive assistance of one person for transfers. She was incontinent of bowel/bladder and had an indwelling catheter. Her diagnoses included neurogenic bladder (unable to control bladder), urinary tract infection (UTI), multiple sclerosis (MS), and anxiety. During an observation and interview on 9/13/2023 at 9:09 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) DD was performing bowel movement incontinence care for R98. R98 had a urinary foley catheter. Observed with the CNA, R98 did not have a device to secure her foley catheter tubing to her leg. CNA DD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pain management interventions were implemented for 1 of 24 resident, (Resident #72) reviewed for pain, resulting in Resident #72's complaint of pain and inadequate pain management. Findings include: Review of a Face Sheet for Resident #72 dated 1/22/19, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with the following pertinent diagnoses: Hemiplegia following a Cerebral Infarct (paralysis on one side following a stroke), Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder, Chronic Pain Syndrome, and Idiopathic Neuropathy (nerve damage of unknown origin). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 scored 14/15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Section J of the MDS revealed Resident #72 received scheduled pain medication as well as non-medication interventions to assist with pain management. During the MDS Pain Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for 2 residents (Resident #95, #381) of 2 residents reviewed for medical records, resulting in the potential for facility staff and providers not having all of the pertinent information to care for residents and track the history of abuse allegations. Findings include: Resident #95 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #95, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: chronic kidney disease. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #95, with a reference date of 8/24/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11/15 which indicated Resident #95 was mildly cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #95 Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed: On 6/25/2023 at 18:29 (EDT) CNA came up to med cart and informed this nurse that resident (Resident #95) had accused CNA of punching him (Resident #95). CNA stated that resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$157,954 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $49,800 — penalty dated 2025-10-15
- $78,806 — penalty dated 2025-06-12
- $29,348 — penalty dated 2024-09-19
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-07-12 for 25 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-10-17 for 19 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COUNTY OF GRAND TRAVERSE | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 01/01/1966 |
| CRAWFORD, CAROL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| GRIGGS, KAREN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/20/2024 |
| MAROIS, MARY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| HAUTAMAKI, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/21/2024 |
| LAVENDER, DARRELL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/21/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235088. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.