Orchard Creek Skilled Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

70.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 139 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.81 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 22 beds and averages 17.9 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.21 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.12 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.22 to 1.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-09-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect by facility staff for one Resident (#4) of one residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm when Resident #4 experienced unnecessary pain and persistent feelings of fear and anxiety.Findings include:Resident #4 (R4) Review of R4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 8/13/25 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, difficulty in walking, and pain in right shoulder. Review of R4's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/25/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicative of intact cognition. On 9/2/2025 at 12:22 PM, an interview was conducted with R4 regarding their satisfaction with the level of care they were receiving at the facility. R4 stated a couple nights ago she needed to use the restroom while in bed, so a certified nursing assistant (CNA) placed her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-10-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00137609. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a fall for one Resident (#18) of one resident reviewed, resulting in Resident #18 falling with staff present and sustaining multiple fractures requiring hospitalization and surgery. Findings include: Resident #18 (R18) Review of a Post Fall/Incident Note dated 4/8/2023 revealed R18 fell in the bathroom while the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was with her. The note revealed [Patient] washed her hand, turned to get towel, and lost balance. fell on left side of face and body. Injuries included laceration on left eyebrow, bleeding around scab on left elbow, and bruising lateral side of left calf. The note revealed R18 was transferred to the hospital. The note also revealed resident should be CGA (Contact Guard Assist). Review of the hospital's History and Physical dated 4/8/23 revealed Patient states she was up with a 1 handed walker going to the restroom with assistance. Upon completion, she went to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-09-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing to promote the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of residents. Findings include: On 9/3/25 at approximately 11:30 a.m. an interview was conducted with Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) J and K in regard to complaints of low staffing numbers. CNAs J and K confirmed that during shift change, residents can wait 30 to 45 minutes after report for staff to come and assist. CNA K stated, Sometimes it can be up to 45 minutes before we are out on the floor and then we have to get people up, get them dressed, toilet, vitals, breakfast, etc. When there are only two of us, it can be a challenge, and they (residents) have to wait a long time. Both CNA J and K confirmed that the current population of residents is requiring more lifts and two person transfers, which causes them both to tend to one resident at a time. CNA J stated, We don't have enough (staff), with the high number of residents who need two staff assistance, it isn't…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as evidenced by:Failing to label, date, and discard expired food in the reach-in refrigerator, walk-in refrigerator, walk-in freezer, and dry storage. Failing to ensure kitchen utensils were stored in a sanitary manner.Failing to ensure the ice cube machine/bin was free from mold accumulation.These deficient practices have the potential to result in food borne illness among any or all of the 17 residents in the facility.Findings include: On 9/2/25 at 11:24 PM, an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with Dietary Manager (DM) G. The following observations were made in the reach-in refrigerator: Undated, unidentifiable meat in a plastic tub covered with plastic wrap. DM G identified this as sliced steak from the previous day's lunch meal. A bowl of what appeared to be cooked onion rings, covered with plastic wrap, undated. A bowl of cubed pineapple, covered in plastic wrap, undated. Two bagels in an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to annually review and update the required Facility Assessment, resulting in the potential for unidentified resources necessary to provide care and services to the resident population.Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment document provided by the facility revealed the Facility Assessment was last completed, updated, or reviewed on 8/6/24.In an interview on 9/4/25 at approximately 11:30 AM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed that the Facility Assessment had not been completed, updated, or reviewed since 8/6/24.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain complete and comprehensive informed consents prior to the administration of psychotropic medications for three Residents (#4, #17, and #20) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include:Resident #17 (R17)Review of R17's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed initial admission to the facility on 7/1/25 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (stroke) and vascular dementia. Review of R17's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/15/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicative of severe cognitive impairment.Review of R17's EMR revealed the following pharmacy order, initiated 7/1/25: Duloxetine HCl Oral Capsule Delayed Release Particles 60 MG (milligram) [an antidepressant (psychotropic) medication], Give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day for depression/pain.Review of R17's EMR revealed a document titled, Consent for Psychoactive Medications which read, in part: The resident's provider has ordered the following psychoactive medications.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assure that procedures were developed and implemented for consistent and accurate processing of medication orders for two Residents (#8 and #15) of six residents reviewed for pharmacy services. This deficiency resulted in Resident #8 being administered the incorrect dosage of an anxiolytic medication and the potential for the inaccurate administration of an anticoagulant for Resident #15. Findings include: Resident #8 (R8)Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/24/2025, revealed R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive respiratory disease (COPD) and anxiety.Review of R8's March 2025 medication administration record (MAR) revealed the following orders: Ativan (a controlled medication used to treat anxiety) Oral Tablet 1 MG [milligram] . Give 4 tablet[s] by mouth every 4 hours for anxiety. Start Date: 3/19/2025 1800 [6:00 PM]. D/C [discontinued] Date: 3/20/2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assure the implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) according to physician order and current standards of practice for two Residents (#10 and #18) of four residents reviewed for EBP utilization.Findings include:Resident #10 (R10)Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/8/2025, revealed R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including left femur fracture, breast cancer and anxiety. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed R10 required substantial/maximal assistance with bathing, lower body dressing and transfers, and partial/moderate assistance with toileting hygiene.Review of R10's electronic medical record revealed R10 had a Stage 2 (partial-thickness tissue loss) pressure injury to her spine. Review of R10's Wound Evaluation, dated 8/31/2025, revealed the pressure injury measured 0.67 centimeters (cm) in length and 0.51 cm in width. Review of the photograph attached to the Wound…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0943 — isolated
  Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective abuse training program for two out of five staff members reviewed for new hires and annual training. Findings include:A review of staff education records and competencies on 9/4/25 revealed the following staff members had not completed the required abuse, neglect and exploitation training:Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) E - Hired on 7/16/25 and had not completed abuse training prior to start date.CNA F - Hired on 8/21/23 with last completed abuse training on 6/26/24.An interview conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/4/25 at approximately 10:30 a.m. confirmed staff abuse training had not been completed per the facilities policy.Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation or Exploitation Policy/Procedure, undated, read, in part, .employees will receive training regarding abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment during new employee orientation and on an annual basis.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a consent was signed for psychoactive medication use and an AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) assessment was completed appropriately for one Resident (R12) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice resulted in the potential for the unnecessary use of mind-altering medications, negative side-effects of medications and decreased quality of life. Findings include: Review of R12's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on 9/16/24 with diagnosis including dementia with behaviors, delirium, and anxiety. Review of R12's 9/23/24 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a 10/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score indicating moderate cognitive impairment. R12 was noted in Section N of the MDS assessment to be taking an antipsychotic medication on a routine basis only. An interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) F on 10/2/24 at 9:52 a.m. RN F confirmed R12 was currently receiving an antipsychotic medication. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-10-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — widespread
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate advance directive information was in place for three Residents (R6, R9, and R10) of three Residents reviewed for advance directives (legal documents that allow a person to identify decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time), resulting in the potential for a resident's preferences for medical care to not be followed by the facility, or other healthcare providers. Findings Include: Review of the MICHIGAN DO-NOT-RESUSCITATE PROCEDURE ACT, Act 193 of 1996 (Revised 3-25-14), revealed, An order executed under this section shall be on a form described in section 4. The order shall be dated and executed voluntarily and signed by each of the following persons: (a) The declarant, the declarant's patient advocate, or another person who, at the time of the signing, is in the presence of the declarant and acting pursuant to the directions of the declarant. (b) The declarant's attending physician. (c) Two witnesses [AGE] years of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper label and dating of foods with the potential to effect 7 of 8 residents (1 resident receives nothing by mouth) resulting in the increased risk of food borne illness. Findings include: During an inspection of a refrigerator located in the resident dining room on 10/23/2023 at 11:41 AM, the following was observed: Opened container of Thick and Easy clear Hydrolyte Thickened Water, no opened date Opened package of cheddar cheese cubes, no opened date Two containers of coffee creamer, no opened date Opened 20 ounce Diet Pepsi, no opened date Two loaf of white bread, No opened or use by date An observation on of a sign displayed on the face of the refrigerator in the dining room revealed all items in this refrigerators must be sealed/covered, labeled and dated or they will be discarded. Items may only be kept for a maximum of three days . In an interview on 10/25/23 at 9:02 AM, Dietary Manager C stated items were discarded after three days so the expectation would be to label the item when opened with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-10-02 for 8 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $342K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI