No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Autumn Woods Residential Health

29800 Hoover Rd, Warren, MI 48093 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 293 certified beds · (586) 574-3444 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
LasikPlus0.3 mi
30300 Hoover Rd Ste 200 · (248) 449-9292 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
30050 Hoover Rd · (586) 754-0000 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
11554 E 12 Mile Rd · (586) 722-2515 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(586) 268-8400 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.5%10.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.5%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.0%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.2%0.1%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%3.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.7%12.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.7%19.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.9%5.1%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.3%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.9%14.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.6%79.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.7%24.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.7%11.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.001.841.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.911.641.80typical

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

34.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 99 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

34.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
38.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 38.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF34.6%CMS range 22.3–46.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.5%CMS range 8.0–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge38.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge36.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge22.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting87.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened8.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.4%CMS range 5.3–12.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.191.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
1.06
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.30
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.00
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
38.0%
Total nursing turnover
41.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 293 beds and averages 225.1 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 68 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.00 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.19 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-13)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-25)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-27 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2985599. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess one resident (R806) for self-administration of medications out of two residents reviewed for self-administration of medications. Findings include: On 5/27/2026 at 2:56PM, an observation of R806's room revealed a medication cup with 4 tablets inside was sitting in front of the resident on a table extending over their bed. R806 stated nursing staff usually watches them take their medications before they leave the room, but this time the nurse left them (the pills) there about an hour ago, but they were half asleep and was not totally sure.Review of R806's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed they were admitted into the facility 7/3/2024 with diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes, altered mental status, and muscle weakness. Review of R806's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition.A review of R806's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake number 2803493.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer pain medication per physician order and resident preference for one (R900) of three residents reviewed for pain management. Findings include:On 3/26/26 at 3:00 PM, an interview with R900 revealed a few days ago, I was waking up in severe pain in the morning. R900 further revealed they did not think they were receiving their night-time dose of pain medication. An inquiry regarding whether they had asked the nurses not to wake them in the night for pain medication, R900 said they want to be awakened for night-time medication, even if they are asleep, so the pain does not get so bad.A review of the medical record revealed R900 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] on the hospice service with the relevant diagnoses: CREST Syndrome Scleroderma and Rheumatoid Arthritis. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment's most recent Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicates intact cognition. A review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake 2626685.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to monitor one resident (R901) of three reviewed for risk of elopement: Findings include:A review of the facility reported incident investigation summary revealed: On 01/21/2026 at approximately 8:45am, certified nursing assistant (CNA A) noted that (R901) was no longer sitting on the sofa where 45 minutes earlier. (CNA A) began looking for the resident. After not being able to locate (R901) staff from all departments began searching the facility inside and on the grounds. The Police Department was contacted due to the concern of cold weather. At approximately 9:15am, the police received a call from a medical clinic that an individual matching the description of (R901) was in their lobby .37 miles away, (R901) was returned to the facility and escorted to the secured unit. R901 ambulates with a steady gait and denied injury. The surveillance cameras were reviewed beginning at 7:15am. (R901) was observed in the hallway on one east low hall sitting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes 1226813 and 2590504.Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure call lights were in reach for four residents (R119, R160, R4 and R239) of six residents whose care needs were reviewed. Findings include: On 08/11/2025 11:19 AM, 11:25 AM, 1:11 PM, 2:00 PM, 2:56, and 4:34 PM, R4 was observed to be in bed with the call light on the floor at head of bed. R160 was observed to be in bed with the call light cord and button looped over a hook on the wall below the call box, and R119 was observed to be in bed, with the call light looped over the call box and vent cart. On 08/12/2025 8:18 AM, 9:17 AM, 11:30 AM, R4 was observed to be in bed with the call light on the floor at head of bed. R160 was observed to be in bed with the call light cord and button looped over a hook on the wall below the call box, and R119 was observed to be in bed, with the call light looped over the call box and vent cart. On 08/12/2025 at 11:37 AM, R239 was observed to be in bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review facility failed to honor a resident's preference for a room change for one resident (R184) of three residents reviewed for rights and preferences. Findings include: On 08/11/2025 at 10:17 AM, R184 was asked about their care at the facility, R184 explained they were not happy. R184 expressed multiple concerns for them, locked closet with no access to clothes, not being allowed to leave the locked unit, not permitted to go outside since September 2024, and other residents wander in and out of their room. R184 reported they have made a request for a room change to Unit Manager (UM) G and Guardian P. R184 expressed staff do not listen to their concerns and feels very aggravated. On 08/12/2025 at 1:25 PM, an unknown male resident was observed sitting on R184's bed and putting on R184's tennis shoes. R184 remarked, this happens all the time, it's frustrating. The UM G was made aware of the observation and was then observed to remove the unknown male resident. A review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure formulated advance directives were completed properly for one resident (R8) out of two reviewed for advanced directives. Findings include:A review of the medical record revealed R8 was admitted into the facility on 5/5/2025 with the following medical diagnoses, Cerebral Infarction and Bipolar Disorder. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental status score of 14/15, indicating an intact cognition. R8 also required assistance with bed mobility and transfers.Further review of the medical records revealed a capacity determination letter signed by a physician on 5/14/2025 and a Licensed Psychologist on 5/12/2025, deeming R8 incapable of making decisions regarding medical treatment. As well as an advance directive signed by R8 dated 7/2025.On 8/13/2025 at 11:23 AM, an interview was conducted with Social Service Director (SSD) D. SSD D reported R8's sisters were supposed to be getting guardianship, but they did not know where they were in the process and would have to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for two sampled residents (R151 and R184) of six reviewed for environment. Findings include: R151On 8/12/2025 at 9:38 AM, R151 was sitting in a wheelchair in their room. R151's bed footboard was observed to be in disrepair with exposed wood and with duct tape around it. On 8/13/2025 at 9:44 AM, R151's bed remained in the same condition. R151 was asked about the condition of the footboard and provided no explanation about its condition. A review of R151's medical record revealed that R151 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Alzheimer's. A review of R151's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] noted R151 with impaired cognition. A review of R151's care plan noted, Focus: Resident has impaired cognitive functioning r/t (related to) Dementia, Intellectually Disabled, decreased memory, decision making, difficulty w/recall, impaired thought processes. Date Initiated: 12/17/2024. Goal:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Intakes: 2578720, 2584022, 2586062 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly assess and document skin bruising for an injury of unknown origin for one resident (R50) of one reviewed for abuse. Findings include:A review of documentation submitted to the State Agency (SA), revealed R50 was admitted into the facility for 7-days of respite care, and was discharged with bruising on various areas of their body without explanation. The resident was taken to a community agency that coordinates healthcare services with the facility for a skin assessment, and was later transferred to the hospital for further evaluation. Further review of the documentation submitted noted photos of bruises in various healing stages most notably on the resident's body, specifically neck, left shoulder and hand.A review of R50's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 7/22/25 and discharged on 7/29/25 with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's Disease, Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition and Diabetes. Further review revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an annual pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) for one resident (R8) out of two reviewed for PASARR's. Findings Include:A review of the medical record revealed R8 was admitted into the facility on 5/5/2025 with the following medical diagnoses, Cerebral Infarction and Bipolar Disorder. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental status score of 14/15, indicating an intact cognition. R8 also required assistance with bed mobility and transfers.A review of the most recent PASARR was dated 6/28/2024.On 8/13/2025 at 11:23 AM, an interview was conducted with the Social Service Director (SSD) D. SSD D reported they would have to look and see if an annual was completed for R8.A request for an updated PASARR for R8 was requested and not received by the end of the survey.A request for a facility policy related to PASARR completion was requested and not received by end of survey.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement fall care plan interventions for one resident (R8) out of three reviewed for falls. Findings include:On 8/11/2025 at 11:32 AM, R8 was observed in the bed with a cane on the right side of the bed, R8 reported they use the cane for mobility. R8 reported they have had a couple falls in the facility.On 8/13/2025 at 10:56 AM, request for R8's Incident and Accident reports was requested but not received by the end of survey.A review of the care plan revealed the following intervention, Mat to floor next to bed left side of bed.On 8/11/2025 at 11:32 AM, no floor mat was observed on the left side of the bed.A review of the medical record revealed R8 was admitted into the facility on 5/5/2025 with the following medical diagnoses, Cerebral Infarction and Bipolar Disorder. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental status score of 14/15, indicating an intact cognition. R8 also required assistance with bed mobility and transfers.On 8/12 at 9:33 Am, no fall mat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide routine finger nail care for two sampled residents (R16 and R20) of six reviewed for activities of daily living. R16On 8/12/2025 at 9:25 AM, R16 was observed in bed with long nails, with a yellowish tint, and a buildup of brown debris under them. R16 was asked if they preferred their nails at the observed length. R16 was observed to hold their hands up towards their face and expressed that the nails were long and that they should be cut. On 8/13/2025 at 9:40 AM, R16 was asked if the staff had cut their nails, R16 reported they had not been cut. R16's nails were observed in the same condition.On 8/13/2025 at 9:47 AM, Unit Manager, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN A) was asked to observe R16's nails. LPN A expressed, R16's nails were long and needed to be cut. LPN A was asked the expectation for resident's nails to get cut. LPN A explained, it is as needed, and nails are to be checked on shower days.A review of R16's care plan noted, Focus: The resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to schedule a hematology (specialty for diseases of the blood) appointment for one resident (R8) out of one reviewed for consultation appointments. Findings Include:On 8/13/2025 at 10:40 AM, R8 was observed in their bed. R8 stated they were doing okay, but their hands have been hurting them.A review of the medical record revealed R8 admitted into the facility on 3/7/2025 with the following medical diagnoses, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Obstructive Sleep Apnea. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental status score of 12/15, indicating an impaired cognition. R8 also required assistance with bed mobility and transfers.Further review of the medical record revealed an active order with a start date of 3/18/2025 for a hematology appointment follow up.On 8/13/2025 at 2:05 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON reported they were unaware of a hematology appointment and would look into it.No further information was received by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely monitoring for two ventilator residents (R3, R35) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care needs. Findings include: R3 On 08/11/2025 at 9:36 AM, R3 was observed to be in bed and restless with non-purposeful movements of the arms and legs. R3 had a tracheostomy (artificial airway inserted via a throat incision) which was connected to a mechanical ventilator (assists resident to breath effectively) via a corrugated plastic tubing (circuit). On 08/11/2025 at 10:42 AM, R3's restlessness continued and the circuit connecting the tracheostomy to the ventilator became disconnected at the tracheostomy site with a movement of R3's left arm which tangled the circuit tubing. An alarm sounded and a red light turned on above the outside of the resident's doorway. No staff were observed to be in the hallway. At 10:44 AM, staff came around the corner from the nurse station, turned back toward the nurse station and then walked up the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mental health services in a timely manner for one resident (R186) out of three reviewed for mood and behavior. Findings include:A review of the medical record revealed R186 admitted into the facility on 5/13/2025 with the following medical diagnoses, Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12/15, indicating an impaired cognition. R186 also required assistance with bed mobility and transfers.Further review of the physician's orders revealed that R186 received Haldol (Antipsychotic) injection, once a month.On 8/13/2025 at 11:04 AM, a request for psychiatric notes for R186 was requested and not received by the end of survey.On 8/13/2025 at 11:23 AM, an interview was conducted with Social Service Director (SSD) D. SSD D reported they are on the list to be seen, and they just switched to a new Nurse Practitioner. SSD D reported the new Nurse Practitioner comes in every Monday and will be seeing R186 soon.On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure safe storage of medication for one resident (R149) of four residents reviewed for medication storage. Findings include:On 8/11/25 at 9:49 AM, an observation on R140's bedside table, a medication cup of pills containing approximately eight pills, two blue oval, two large round white, one small round white, one small yellow round, one white capsule, and one yellowish clear gel capsule. Two bottles of Nystatin Powder were also on the bedside table on 8/11/25, 8/12/25, and 8/13/25. When R149 was queried, they revealed their nurse always leaves the pills for them to take when they are ready. Further inquiry revealed R149 identified the medication as some are blood pressure pills. They also indicated the powder is for under my folds.A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed on 4/7/23, R149 was admitted with the following relevant diagnoses: End Stage Renal Disease with dependence on Renal Dialysis, Chronic Heart Failure, Diabetes, Dependence on Oxygen, and Polyosteoarthritis. Further review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store a nebulizer mouthpiece for two residents (R6 and R191) out of two reviewed for nebulizer storage. Findings include:R6 On 8/13/2025 at 10:40 AM, R6 was observed in bed and wearing oxygen. R6 reported they were about to get out of bed and in their chair. A nebulizer mouthpiece was noted to be laying on the nightstand, with no barrier beneath it and an undated line. R6 was asked if they use the nebulizer mouthpiece often and they stated they use it everyday. On 8/13/2025 at 1:02 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) “V”. LPN “V” reported they do store the nebulizer mouth pieces in a bag. LPN “V” reported that R6 had just used the nebulizer before they went outside. LPN “V” reported they were going to find a bag. A review of the medical record revealed R6 admitted into the facility on 3/7/2025 with the following medical diagnoses, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Obstructive Sleep Apnea. A review of the most recent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00152547. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean environment for one resident, (R702) of three residents reviewed for home-like environment. Findings include: A review of the complaint submitted to the State Agency revealed the resident's room was observed as dirty upon visitation. On 4/28/25 at 10:58 AM, attempts to arouse R702 were made to no avail however, an observation of the resident's room revealed unidentifiable brown stains on the fitted and flat linen sheets the resident was laying on. The floor of the room was sticky underneath the surveyor's shoes, the door had what appeared to be an unidentifiable dried liquid on it, the baseboards throughout the perimeter of the room were observed as stained with an unknown caked on substance. The resident's bathroom was also observed with feces on the toilet seat. A review of R702's medical record revealed the resident was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00148207. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain privacy from electronic devices (camera) located in the room of one resident (R704) of three reviewed for privacy. Findings include: On 11/20/24 at 10:30 AM, a sign was observed on the outside of R704's the door. The sign revealed, Introduce oneself to the mother on camera when entering resident room. Once in R704's room an approximately 4 x 6 inch camera was observed on R704's overbed table located below the window. R704's bed was about two feet away from the camera. On the left side of the same window toward the head of the bed, a (name of) camera (used to monitor in real-time) was observed affixed to the wall next to the window about 10 inches from a larger camera. Both cameras were facing R704's room entry door. On 11/20/24 at 10:45 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B was queried about the function of the cameras. LPN B revealed, the camera is connected to R704's mother's phone.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Intake MI00147638 Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent verbal and physical abuse for one resident (R801) out of four reviewed for abuse. Findings include: A review an investigation summary revealed the following, On 10/14/2024 at around 7:00 AM, Nurse D and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) E reported to A.D.O.N (Assistant Director of Nursing) . that they observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C yelling profanities at R801 for trying to sleep on the couch in the dayroom during their midnight shift on 10/13/2024 between 2:30am -3:30am. When R801 refused to get up off the couch LPN C continued to yell at them then got behind the couch and started lifting the couch to get R801 off. R801 then rolled onto the floor. Staff helped R801 up and took R801 to the room . A review of the medical record revealed R801 was admitted into the facility on 2/26/2022 with the following diagnoses, Presence of Right Artificial Joint and Depression. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an abuse allegation in a timely manner for one resident (R801) out of one reviewed for reporting. Findings Include: A review an investigation summary revealed the following, On 10/14/2024 at around 7:00 AM, Nurse D and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) E reported to ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) . that they observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C yelling profanities at R801 for trying to sleep on the couch in the dayroom during their midnight shift on 10/13/2024 between 2:30am -3:30am. When R801 refused to get up off the couch LPN C continued to yell at them then got behind the couch and started lifting the couch to get R801 off. R801 then rolled onto the floor. Staff helped R801 up and took R801 to the room . A review of the initial report revealed that the incident was reported to the SA on 10/14/2024. On 10/24/2024 at 11:58 AM, an interview was conducted with ADON B. ADON B was asked why the incident was reported to the SA on 10/14/2024 when the incident occurred on 10/12/2024. ADON B stated the incident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the sanitizer buckets, failed to ensure dishware was dry before stacking, and failed to ensure resident food items were dated. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 7/23/24 between 8:55 AM-9:30 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen with Dietary Staff P, the following items were observed: There were 2 red sanitizer buckets with wiping cloths inside observed in the kitchen area. Dietary Staff P stated the buckets contained sanitizer solution. The sanitizer level in both buckets was tested with a test strip, and the strip did not change color to denote the presence of sanitizer solution in the buckets. Dietary Staff P stated the buckets would be changed. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code, Section 3-304.14 Wiping Cloths, Use Limitation, .(B) Cloths in-use for wiping counters and other equipment surfaces shall be: (1) Held between uses in a chemical sanitizer solution at a concentration specified under § 4-501.114;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY R79 Review of the facility record for R79 revealed an admission date of 12/26/24 with diagnoses that included Osteomyelitis of the Left Ankle and Foot and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. On 07/23/24 at 10:58 AM, R79 reported they were bothered by their toenails being too long and needing to be trimmed and stated they could not recall seeing a Podiatrist since their admission to the facility. On 07/24/24 at 11:54 AM, R79's feet were observed with staff assisting to remove the bedding and socks. R79's toenails were excessively long on multiple toes including some sharp, unfiled corners and particularly on the bilateral great toes which were approximately one inch beyond the nail bed. On 07/24/24 at 1:31 PM, the facility Director of Nursing (DON) reported non-diabetic residents can have their toenails trimmed by nursing staff and diabetic residents are referred to Podiatry for toenail care. On 07/24/24 at 1:43 PM, the DON observed R79's feet with the surveyor and acknowledged that multiple toenails needed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC- An IV-Intraveneous line inserted via the veins in the arm) dressing was dated and documented when changed for two residents (R82, R131) of two reviewed for PICC line care. Findings include: R82 On 07/23/24 at 9:24 AM, R82 was observed to be in bed, a rolled gauze dressing was observed to be wrapped around the left upper arm of R82. A single lumen PICC line cap was visible at the bottom edge of the the dressing. A date was not visible on the tape which held the dressing in place. The insertion site was not visible. An IV pump was observed at the left side of the bed. On 07/24/24 at 8:44 AM, 12:13 PM, 1:14 PM and 3:47 PM, R82 was observed to be in bed with the rolled gauze dressing wrapped around the left upper arm of R82. A single lumen PICC line cap was visible at the bottom edge of the the dressing. A date was not visible on the tape which held the dressing in place. The insertion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes M100144913 and M100145603. This citation had two deficient practice statements. Deficient practice statement #1. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a mechanical lift sling was in good repair and two trained staff were present during transfer to prevent a fall from a mechanical lift for one (R494) of one resident reviewed for falls, resulting in a hospitalization. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R494 revealed an admission date of 3/1/2022 with diagnoses that included Cerebral Infarction with Left Hemiplegia, Muscle Weakness, and Anxiety Disorder. Additional review of R494's record revealed a progress note dated 7/8/2024, documented R494 had a fall (from a mechanical lift due to a ripped sling), subsequently assessed by nursing staff then reported the fall to Nurse Practitioner F. The note indicated R494 hit their head, was on blood thinners, and they had a throbbing headache, and sent to the emergency room. The Post-Fall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store medication in a safe and secure manner for four (R97, R102, R11 and R33) of the 35 total sampled residents, reviewed for medication and storage. Findings include: R97 On 7/23/24 at 9:12 AM, R97 was observed lying in bed. R97's overbed table was observed with a single white pill in a medication cup. R97 was asked how long the pill had been in their room. R97 stated, I don't know, maybe this morning. R97 was asked what the pill was for, R97 was observed to move their hands and said neuropathy (nerve damage). R102 On 7/23/24 at 11:22 AM, R102 was observed in their room with a medication cup that had one orange gel capsule, the cup was observed in their window seal. R102 was asked about the pill. R102 stated, I didn't take it because I had a bowel movement this morning. I told the nurse I didn't want it. R111 On 7/23/24 at 2:19 PM, R111 was observed in their room with a red inhaler on the overbed table. R111 was asked if they normally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to repair or replace a bed in disrepair for one (R136) of eight resident's reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R136 revealed an admission date of 07/12/23 with diagnoses that included Infection of the Right Ankle and Foot, Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy, and Muscle Weakness. The record indicated that R136 was most recently readmitted to the facility on [DATE] following a Right Above Knee Amputation. On 07/23/24 at 11:17 AM, R136 reported the height adjustment of their bed had not worked since I've been here. The resident demonstrated using the remote control that the head and foot adjustments worked and when they attempted to adjust the bed height the bed did not move and it made a loud grinding noise. R136 stated they had reported this issue to staff and it was never addressed. On 07/24/24 at 12:03 PM, R136 was interviewed further regarding the reporting of their bed malfunction. When asked if they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00142307. Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to follow up on medical appointments and consultations for skin for one resident (R904) of four residents reviewed for skin management. Findings include: A review of the Intake summary revealed, . head is getting worse. [R904] has cancer in it. They have not giving me a referral so [R904] can see an oncologist and [R904] is in serious pain. I think this is abuse. They have known [R904] had this cancer since November and nothing is getting done. It is getting worse. Please help. Areview of R904's medical record revealed, R904 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnosis of Multiple Fractures of Ribs. R904 was discharge to the hospital on 2/14/24. A review of R904's referral form scanned into the medical record dated 10/19/23 noted, Recommended follow up information: [local Dermatology] 3-7 days. A review of R904's orders revealed, Order: Dermatology consult for forehead lesion one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00142307. Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to complete wound care treatments as ordered for one resident (R904) of four residents reviewed for skin management. Findings include: A review of the intake summary revealed, . head is getting worse. [R904] has cancer in it. They have not giving me a referral so [R904] can see an oncologist and [R904] is in serious pain. I think this is abuse. They have known [R904] had this cancer since November and nothing is getting done. It is getting worse. Please help. Areview of R904's medical record revealed, R904 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnosis of Multiple Fractures of Ribs. R904 was discharge to the hospital on 2/14/24. A review of R904's orders revealed, Order: Cleanse with wound cleanser. Pat dry. Apply Honey Gel to Lt. upper face Skin barrier wipe to peri wound. Cover with calcium alginate Ag and dry dressing every night shift for wound care AND as needed for wound care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citaiton pertains to Intake MI00139994. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer prescribed pain mediations on multiple days for one resident (R703) out of two reviewed for medication administration. Findings Include: A review of the Intake noted the following, Complainant stated the resident was only given Tylenol when [R703] is supposed to be taking Morphine. A review of the medical record revealed that R703 admitted into the facility on 9/29/2023 with the following diagnoses, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, Stage 4 (damage to deep skin tissue including tendons and nerves) and Alzheimer's Disease. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 99, indicating severly impaired cognition. R703 also required extensive 1 person assist with bed mobility and transfers. A review of the physician orders revealed the following orders, Order: Acetaminophen-Codeine Oral Tablet 300-30 MG. Directions: DAW (Dispense as written) Give one tablet by mouth every 8 hours for pain. Start Date: 9/29/2023 .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Intake MI00139994. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate wound treatment for one resident (R703) out of one reviewed for wounds, resulting in the potential worsening of existing pressure ulcers and/ or development of new wounds. Findings Include: A review of the intake noted the following, Staff failed to change the dressing on the resident's wounds as ordered. When [R703] went home there was no dressing on [R703's] wound at all and it hadn't been cleaned. A review of the medical record revealed that R703 admitted into the facility on 9/29/2023 with the following diagnoses, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, Stage 4 (damage to deep skin tissue including tendons and nerves) and Alzheimer's Disease. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 99, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R703 also required extensive 1 person assist with bed mobility and transfers. Further review of the MDS revealed the following, Number of stage 4 pressure ulcers: 1. Further review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00138295. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label/date and flush/disconnect an enteral feeding (tube feeding) for one resident (R702) of one reviewed for PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) care, resulting in the potential for administration error, altered nutrition, and/or PEG tube occlusion. Findings include: A review of R702's record revealed that the resident was initially admitted into the facility on [DATE] and most recently re-admitted from the hospital on [DATE]. R702's medical diagnoses include Respiratory Failure, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis (weakness/paralysis on one side) following Cerebral Infarction, Tracheostomy Status, Gastrostomy Status, Contracture, Pulmonary Embolism, Tachycardia, and Essential (Primary) Hypertension (high blood pressure). Further review of R702's record revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired and fully dependent on staff for care and activities of daily living. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes MI00138295 and M100138310. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications per order for one resident (R702) of six reviewed for quality of care, resulting in the potential for exacerbation of chronic health conditions. Findings include: A review of multiple complaints submitted to the State Agency alleged that the facility failed to properly administer R702's medications blood pressure and seizure medications per order. A review of R702's record revealed that the resident was initially admitted into the facility on [DATE] and most recently re-admitted from the hospital on [DATE]. R702's medical diagnoses include Respiratory Failure, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis (weakness/paralysis on one side) following Cerebral Infarction, Tracheostomy Status, Gastrostomy Status, Contracture, Pulmonary Embolism, Tachycardia, and Essential (Primary) Hypertension (high blood pressure). Further review of R702's record revealed that the resident is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure open food items were dated, ensure sanitizer test strips were available for use, ensure staff donned beard restraints, and ensure staff changed gloves to prevent cross contamination. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 5/22/23 between 8:30 AM-9:15 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen with Dietary Staff G, the following items were observed: In the walk-in cooler, there was an opened, undated 1 gallon container of salad dressing, and an opened, undated 1 gallon container of pickle relish. Dietary Staff G confirmed the items should have been dated when opened. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 3-501.17: Ready-to-eat, potentially hazardous food prepared and held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit or less for a maximum of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the resident's name, date, time, and order information for enteral feeding (Liquid nutrient solution fed through a PEG-Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastostomy tube inserted in through the stomach) was completed, for four (#'s R25, R42, R128, and R195) residents reviewed for tube feedings, resulting in the potential for tube feeding not administered according to the physicians orders. Findings include: Resident 25 (R25). On 5/22/23 at 10:18 AM, R25 was observed in their room sleeping. Observed in the room was a tube feeding in progress, the formula bottle was observed without a blank label with R25's information. Next to the formula there was a water bag that was labeled with R25's order information. A review of R25's medical record noted, Order: in the evening Isosource 1.5 via PEG @ (at) 83cc (cubic centimeters)/hr (hour) x 18 hours (hr) or total volume 1494cc infused. 1/19/23. Order: in the evening Autoflush via PEG H2O @ 65cc/hr x…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication refrigerators were maintained within an appropriate temperature range for two of four medication refrigerators and failed to ensure the resident identifier and date opened were labeled on the medication container when opened for three of five medications carts observed, resulting in the potential for the use of expired medication, inadvertent use of another residents medication and degraded medication. Findings include: On [DATE] at 8:37 AM, the third floor high medication cart was reviewed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Z. Two vials of insulin were not dated with the open date on the vials. On [DATE] at 2:53 PM, the low 300 east medication was observed with LPN Z with one insulin not dated on vial. [DATE] 07:58 AM, the two west low hall cart was reviewed with LPN K. A Breo inhaler and an Incruse inhaler were dated but not labeled with the residents name on the inhaler. On [DATE] at 8:29 AM, the one east high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that food was served in a palatable manner and at the preferred temperature for three residents (R39, R85, R139) and five confidential group residents of fifteen residents reviewed for palatable food, resulting in resident dissatisfaction during meals. Findings include: Resident #39 (R39) On 5/22/23 at 10:13 AM, during an initial tour of the facility, R39 was interviewed about food palatability at the facility and stated, The food needs to be fixed. On 5/24/23 at 1:25 PM, R39 was further interviewed about the food served at the facility and stated, The food is terrible. On 5/24/23 at 1:38 PM, a review of R39's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R39 was most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Kidney disease and Depression, with psychotic features. R39's most recent quarterly minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that R39 had a moderately impaired cognition. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the care plan for turning/repositioning frequency for five (R15, R114, R116, R131, R156) of seven residents reviewed for repositioning resulting in resident dissatisfaction with care, discomfort and potential for onset of or worsening of pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R15 revealed an admission date of 05/02/23 with diagnoses that included Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, Acute Kidney Failure and Depression. R15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R15 required Moderate level assistance for bed mobility and transfers. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 12/15 indicated Moderate cognitive impairment. On 05/22/23 at 9:13 AM, R15 reported long call light response times, sometimes up to 2 hours. R15 stated They tell me they're understaffed if I say something. R15 was laying on their back in the bed during this initial observation. On 05/22/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake number MI00136364. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer medication to prevent seizures for one resident (R139) of one resident reviewed for medication administration, resulting in the potential for the resident to experience an increase in seizure activity and injury related to seizure activity. Findings include: On [DATE] at 1:30 PM, R139's electronic medical record (EMR) was reviewed and indicated the following medication order for R139: Briviact Tablet 100 milligram (mg) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours related to Epilepsy Start Date: [DATE]. On [DATE] at 1:34 PM, R139's May's Medication Administration Record (MRR) was reviewed and revealed that R139 was not administered Briviact on [DATE] and [DATE]. On [DATE] at 1:38 PM, R139's care plan was reviewed and revealed the following, Focus: The resident has a seizure disorder r/t (related to) epilepsy. Date Initiated: [DATE]. Revision on: [DATE]. Goal: The resident will remain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a home-like environment for one resident, (R145) reviewed for homelike environment resulting in an unsanitary environment with wet and a buildup of dried tube feeding formula on the tube feeding pole and floor, and the potential for resident and resident representative dissatisfaction with their living conditions. Findings include: On 5/22/23 at 9:13 AM, during initial tour, the room of R145 was observed to have a large pool of wet tube feeding formula on the floor and tube feeding pole. The tube feeding formula was observed on the floor and pole at 10:51 AM, 12:56 PM and 3:22 PM. On 5/23/23 at 8:58 AM and 3:40 PM, the large pool of tube feeding formula remained on the floor and tube feeding pole. On 5/24/23 at 8:42 AM, the tube feeding fluid remained on the floor and tube feeding pole. On 5/24/23 at 1:33 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was informed of the observations of R145's room, and asked whose responsibility it is to clean up tube feeding fluid off the floor. She explained that it's an all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
VESTRA SPV3, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL95%since 12/23/2020
MILLER, MICHELLEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2024
WOLF, ELIZABETHIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/23/2020
ANGEL, MELODYIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2024
GRIGG, SUSANIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2024
FARBENBLUM, EDWARDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/23/2020
PHAN, TOMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
ROSSO, RALPHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$28.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.5M
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 55%Medicare 5%Other / private 40%

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$434per resident / day
operating cost
$13,186per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$403per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235427. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next