Maple Manor Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 95 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 32.6 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.34 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.03 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.43 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.79 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update the care plan for one (R4) of one resident reviewed for care plans to include R4's pressure ulcer or prescribed interventions. On 7/16/2025 at 9:03 AM, R4 was observed sitting up in bed awake and alert with some confusion. There was no pressure relieving mattress in place or other pressure relieving measures observed. R4 consented to receiving incontinence care from CNA (certified nursing assistant) C. During care, a dime-sized shallow crater-like opened area was observed on the resident's coccyx area. There was dried white cream observed to be covering the surrounding area. CNA C reported the resident developed the pressure ulcer a couple weeks ago and a cream was being applied to the area. Registered Nurse (RN) D entered the resident's room and confirmed the resident's pressure ulcer developed in the facility. RN D reviewed R4's Electronic Health Record (EHR) but could not provide any documentation to support R4 had a care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate delivery of activity of daily living (ADL) care for two residents (R9 and R23) out of three residents reviewed for hygiene resulting in unkempt facial hair and overgrown fingernails.R9 On 7/15/2025 at 11:50 a.m., R9 was observed in the therapy room with long facial hair and long dirty untrimmed fingernails. R9 was not available for interview. On 7/16/2025 at 10:24 a.m., R9 was observed with long facial hair and long dirty untrimmed fingernails. During the interview the resident confirmed not being asked to get shaved not even on scheduled shower days and been wanting to be shaved and to have nail care provided. The resident said before coming to the facility his beard and mustache were trimmed neat. R9 stated, I was waiting for someone to cut my facial hairs.” According to the electronic medical record, R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hypertension, idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement pressure ulcer care for one (R4) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers resulting in R4 developing a stage two pressure ulcer (open sore, partial thickness loss of skin, presents as shallow crater) on the coccyx when prescribed pressure ulcer skin treatments that included a Low-Air-Loss (LAL) mattress were not implemented.On 7/16/2025 at 9:03 AM, R4 was observed sitting up in bed awake and alert with some confusion. There was no pressure relieving mattress in place or other pressure relieving measures observed. R4 consented to receiving incontinence care from CNA (certified nursing assistant) C. During care, a dime-sized shallow crater-like opened area was observed on the resident's coccyx area. There was dried white cream observed to be covering the surrounding area. CNA C reported the resident developed the pressure ulcer a couple weeks ago and a cream was being applied to the area. Registered Nurse (RN) D entered the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately record the use of an antibiotics for 1 of 1 resident (R1) on the facility's antibiotic surveillance log resulting in R1's use of antibiotics from 3/26/25 - 5/23/25 not recorded on the facility log and an incorrect facility infection rate for the months April, May, and June of 2025. On 7/17/25 at 10:01 AM the facility's Infection Prevention Control Program was reviewed with Registered Nurse and Infection Preventionist (RN) G. Antibiotic Stewardship was reviewed for R1.According to R1's Electronic Health Record (EHR), R1 admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Urinary Retention and required a supra-pubic catheter (flexible tube surgically inserted through the lower abdomen into the bladder to drain urine). On 3/18/25 R1 was diagnosed with a UTI (urinary tract infection). A Urologist prescribed the following antibiotic: Macrobid 100 mg (milligrams) twice a day for 7 days and then Macrobid 50 mg once a day for 90 days. A review of R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) from 3/18/25 through 6/25/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the influenza and pneumococcal immunizations/vaccines for one (R4) of five residents resulting in R4 not receiving these immunizations/vaccines that were consented to in January 2025. On 7/17/2025 at 11:00 AM the facility's Infection Prevention Control Program was reviewed with Registered Nurse and Infection Preventionist (RN) G. Immunizations/vaccines were reviewed for R4.According to R4's Electronic Health Record the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease. On 1/7/2025 the resident and the resident's Legal Guardian (LG) signed consents for the resident to receive the pneumococcal and influenza vaccines. There was no documentation to support the resident received those vaccines.RN G was queried and said, The resident was screened and determined to be eligible for both the pneumococcal and influenza vaccine but did not receive either one of those vaccines. It was missed. They should have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0887 — isolated
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the Covid-19 vaccine for one (R4) of five residents resulting in R4 not receiving the Covid-19 vaccine that was consented to in January 2025. On 7/17/2025 at approximately 11:00 AM the facility's Infection Prevention Control Program was reviewed with Registered Nurse and Infection Preventionist (RN) G. Immunizations/vaccines were reviewed for R4.According to R4's Electronic Health Record, the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease. On 1/7/2025 the resident and the resident's Legal Guardian (LG) signed a consent for the resident to receive the Covid-19 vaccine. There was no documentation to support the resident had received the Covid-19 vaccine.RN G was queried and said, The resident was screened and determined to be eligible for Covid-19 vaccine. It was missed. They should have received the Covid vaccine. I have no excuse. RN G confirmed it was the facility's policy to screen, educate, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0624 — isolated
  Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00149794. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate discharge planning was in place for one resident (R400) of three residents reviewed for discharge planning, resulting in R400/representative not educated on the administration of an injectable anticoagulant (a highest-risk medications used thin blood and prevent blood clots), the potential for medical complications (bleeding) and hospitalization. Findings include: Review of the intake complaint, Hospital Social Worker A revealed the following: Complaint states (they are) a social worker at (Hospital) where resident (R400) is currently at. (Hospital Social Worker A) states resident (R400) was discharged from facility on 1/25/25 with a bottle of heparin (anti-coagulant, believed to prevent blood clots) and syringes without any explanation as to how to use the medication. (Hospital Social Worker A) states this medication is usually administered by a nurse. (Hospital Social Worker A) states…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove expired, undated, unlabeled food from the kitchen walk-in cooler, freezer, pantry and resident refrigerators. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all the residents who consumed food from the kitchen and resident refridgerators, resulting in the increased potential for food borne illness. Findings include: On 9/25/24 beginning at 8:45 AM, the initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with Dietary Manager (DM) A. During the tour, the following items were observed in the walk-in cooler: - a box of opened moldy bell peppers undated - two bags of mixed salad rotten undated. - a tub of white onions undated - a box of single serving sour cream undated no expiration date The following item was observed in the kitchen freezer: -a frozen 20-ounce bottle of red pop. DM A said staff items do not belong in this fridge/freezer. The following was observed in the pantry: - an opened 26-ounce bottle of honey with expiration date of 8/24/24. DM A agreed all items should be labeled, dated and expired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a comprehensive Infection Control Program that conducted proper facility-wide surveillance and consistently reviewed microbiology summary reports. Findings include: On 9/27/24 beginning at 11:35 AM, the facility's infection control program was reviewed with Infection Preventionist (IP) F and the Interim Director of Nursing (I-DON) and the following was noted: 1. When queried about a list of diseases that may occur that are to be reported to state and local health departments, IP F stated, I don't have a list. 2. When queried about a staff call-in log that documents staff's reasons for calling in, IP F stated, I don't look at the nurse call-in log. IP F added that sometimes the nurse will inform her if the employee calls in sick with symptoms, but this information is not documented or tracked. The I-DON said staff call-ins should be tracked so we know if there is an infection brewing or starting. This information can be used to monitor the residents that the staff have taken care of. 3. The microbiology summary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess for self-medication administration prior to leaving medications at bedside for one resident (R12) out of two residents reviewed during medication administration. Findings Included: Resident #12(R12) Review of the medical record demonstrated R12 was admitted to the facility 06/25/2023 with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, hypertension, cardiomyopathy (disease of the heart muscle that makes it hard for the heart to pump blood), atrial fibrillation, venous insufficiency, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and Gout (build up of uric acid in bone joints). The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/16/2024, demonstrated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively intact) out of 15. During medication administration on 09/26/2024 at 07:30 a.m. Registered Nurse (RN) I was observed preparing medication to be given to R12. RN I explained that R12 had medication at beside that she administered on her own. RN I explained…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $240K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI