Parkview Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 30 beds and averages 22.5 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.07 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.16 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.23 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.32 to 0.78 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-02-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure insulin was administered according to manufacturer's guidelines for 1 of 1 resident (R1) resulting in the potential for serious harm or death when R1 had to be sent to emergency department (ED) for hypoglycemia (low blood sugar (BS)) when staff administered R1's insulin without ensuring he ate within the required time frame of 5-10 minutes. The IJ began on 2/5/24, when licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A failed to follow manufacturer guidelines when administering Novolog (a rapid acting insulin) to R1. R1 was administered insulin at 11:14 a.m. without being fed any type of meal or sustenance within 5-10 minutes of administration and was subsequently sent to the ED with severe hypoglycemia for medical treatment. The facility administrator and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the IJ on 2/21/24 at 2:22 p.m., which was identified at the scope and severity of J-ISOLATED. The IJ was removed on 2/22/24 at 11:37 a.m., but non-compliance remained at the lower scope and severity of D: No actual harm with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review the facility failed to obtain a bed hold for 1 of 4 sampled residents (R24) reviewed for hospitalization Findings include: R24's 4/16/26, accepted discharge with return anticipated Minnimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified R24 had an unplanned short-term general hospital stay beginning on 4/2/26. Additionally, the 4/6/26, accepted quarterly MDS assessment identified R24's cognition was intact. He was independent with set-up assistance from staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADLS), except dressing of lower body, which required some assistance from staff. He was able to ambulate independently and used no assistive devices. R24 had diagnoses including emphysema, heart disease with high blood pressure, congestive heart failure, diabetes, difficulty swallowing, and chronic kidney disease. R24's progress notes identified on 4/2/26 at 10:30 a.m. R24 was increasingly fatigued this morning and continued to be weak and was taken to the clinic by his family. At 3:06 p.m. facility received a phone call that R24 had been admitted to acute care for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to revise the care plan for 2 of 12 sampled resident (R15 and R18) reviewed.Findings include: R15R15's 4/6/26, accepted quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS) assessment identified R15's cognition was severely impaired. R15 was independent with her dressing, toileting and ambulation using a walker. R15 had occasional pain and took an antidepressant, diuretic, antiplatelet, and opioid medication. R15's current Diagnosis Report identified Alzheimer's disease, dementia, muscle weakness, long term use of pain medication, hallucinations, anxiety disorder, and high blood pressure. Observation and interview on 5/4/26 at 1:09 p.m., with R15 identified the facility took her scissors away from her and she cannot use her scissors anymore. She reported she was not endangering anyone, she had her knitting stuff but no scissors to cut the string. Observed was a bag next to her recliner with a large ball of yarn on the floor next to the bag with string from the ball of yarn draped into the bag. The bag was open at the top and other balls of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff had appropriately followed medication administration through to completion for 1 of 1 sampled resident (R4) with a nebulized (inhaled) medication by providing appropriate supervision and follow policy and procedure for the cleaning of the medication cup after administration was completed. Findings include: R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accepted on 4/6/26, identified her cognition was intact and had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen levels), and was dependent on supplemental oxygen, sleep apnea. R4 required moderate assistance of 1 staff for transfers, dressing, and hygiene. Observation on 5/4/26 at 5:30 p.m., in R4's room identified a handheld nebulizer was lying on her end table still connected to the nebulizer machine. The cup that holds the liquid medication still contained approximately half of the liquid medication. R4 was not in the room. Observation and interview on 5/4/26 at 5:45 p.m., with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure documentation of 1 of 1 sampled resident's (R4) ability to self-administer medication was consistent and accurate throughout the medical record.Findings include: R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accepted on 4/6/26, identified her cognition was intact, she had diagnoses of heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), respiratory failure with hypoxia, dependence on supplemental oxygen, sleep apnea, and atrial fibrillation. R4 requires moderate assistance of 1 staff for transfers, dressing, and hygiene. Observation on 5/4/26 at 5:30 p.m., in R4's room identified a handheld nebulizer was lying on her end table still connected to the nebulizer machine. The cup that holds the liquid medication still contained approximately half of the medication. R4 was not in the room. R4's May 2026 medication administration record (MAR) identified on 5/4/26 staff documented that R4 had received a nebulizer treatment of ipratropium/albuterol inhalation solution 0.5-2.5 milligrams (MG) per…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 observed nebulizer (inhaled medication) medication cup was rinsed and left to air dry after each medication administration for 1 of 1 resident (R4) to prevent potential complication of infection. Findings include: R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accepted on 4/6/26, identified her cognition was intact, she had diagnoses of heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), respiratory failure with hypoxia, dependence on supplemental oxygen, sleep apnea, and atrial fibrillation. R4 requires moderate assistance of 1 staff for transfers, dressing, and hygiene. Observation on 5/4/26 at 5:30 p.m., in R4's room identified a handheld nebulizer was lying on her end table still connected to the nebulizer machine. The cup that holds the liquid medication still contained a approximately half of the medication. R4 was not in the room. Observation and interview on 5/4/26 at 5:45 p.m., with registered nurse (RN)-A observed the nebulizer cup on the end table. She agreed there was a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-24 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure data submitted to the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee was analyzed and documented to ensure areas identified had oversight for their perspective outcomes brought forth. This had the potential to affect all 18 residents. Findings include: Review of the monthly QAPI meeting minutes from November 2024 identified department heads were bringing data forth to QAPI on various topics such as medication errors, falls, pressure ulcers, weight loss, pharmacy services, infection control, admissions and discharges, staff agency use, adverse event monitoring however, only falls and pressure ulcers had a benchmark goal identified with data but no analysis of the data or identified actions the facility was going to take to achieve their goals and monitoring to determine if goals were met or QAPI needed to continue monitoring to ensure compliance. The other areas identified had no documented benchmarks for goals the facility was trying to achieve, nor analysis of the data brought forth, or identified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-24 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to have evidence of a Performance Improvement Project (PIP) which focused on high risk or problem-prone areas identified thorough and appropriate data collection and analysis and evaluation of the identified concern(s) during QAPI. This had the potential to affect all 18 residents. Findings include: Review of QAPI minutes from 11/8/24 through 4/11/25 identified No PIP projects were noted. Interview on 4/22/25 with regional administrator (RA) identified the facility had identified a PIP project however, they had not developed a goal, there was no action plan, it had not been discussed at the QAPI meeting, and no staff had been trained. The RA agreed the facility failed to have the identified PIP follow through. Review of the undated, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) policy identified the QAPI committee would oversee areas for improvement, develop an action plan, and analyze the results of the plan. The facility would maintain evidence of the ongoing QAPI program with documentation of data, analysis, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-24 · tag F0868 — widespread
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and document review, the Quality Assurance (QA) committee failed to ensure they received reports from the infection preventionist on the infection control program for 1 of 3 quarters reviewed. Findings include: Review of monthly QAPI meeting minutes of November 2024, January 2025 and April 2025 identified that April had no data brought forth or report on the infection control program for review by the QAPI committee. The April QAPI meeting sign in sheet identified attendance by the director of nursing (DON) as the infection preventions/DON. Interview on 4/22/25 at 4:46 p.m., with the administrator identified he was unaware that the infection preventionist had not provided data or a report on the infection control program however, he confirmed he was at the meeting. He revealed he had received his administrator license 4 weeks ago and the facility had a lot of turnovers recently as the social service designee had resigned and the director of nursing was an interim, so he did not realize the infection control information had been missed. No policy obtained related…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure employee illnesses were tracked to identify when employees would be able to return to work after an illness dependent upon their symptoms. In addition, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 (certified nursing assistant and dietary aide) had completed tuberculosis testing (TST) upon hire. This had the potential to affect all 18 residents in the facility Findings include: EMPLOYEE SURVEILLANCE Review of Employee Absence Report sheets from April 2025 identified the following areas of documentation: employee name, date, time, called in, scheduled shift, reason for absence, illness and symptoms, physician visit and date of visit. However, the facility did not accurately complete the logs to ensure all necessary information was monitored. On: 1) 4/2/25, nurse aide (NA)-D was noted to have called in sick from work with symptoms of not feeling well and unable to sleep and stomach issues. U-A was not seen by a physician. There was no mention when or if NA-D's symptoms resolved prior to returning to work. 2) 4/2/25, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-24 · tag F0882 — widespread
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the acting infection preventionist (IP) (who is the facility's director of nursing (DON)) had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. This had the potential to affect all 18 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Interview on 4/22/25 at 10:23 a.m., with the interim director of nursing (DON) identified she oversees the infection control program but had not completed her IP training and certification course. Interview on 4/22/25 at 10:24 a.m., with registered nurse (RN)-B, who is the facility consultant, identified the facility used advertisements through online job boards to recruit a permanent DON, as well, as an assistant director of nursing (ADON) to oversee the infection control program. Interview on 4/22/25 at 10:46 a.m., with the regional administrator identified the facility did not have a certified IP who worked at least part time nor onsite at the facility. An Indeed (online job search website) post identified the facility had listed for an IP under the ADON…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,521 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,521 — penalty dated 2024-02-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN