Havenwood Care Center
1633 Delton Avenue NW, Bemidji, MN 56601 · For profit - Corporation · 65 certified beds · (218) 444-1745 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $137,245 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-16)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 22.3% | 18.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.9% | 4.1% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.6% | 1.9% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 2.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.2% | 4.1% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.5% | 4.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 22.4% | 20.5% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.1% | 12.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.5% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.9% | 5.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.1% | 24.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.4% | 17.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 75.8% | 82.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.6% | 23.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 28.5% | 14.8% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.64 | 1.61 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.55 | 1.90 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 44.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.0%CMS range 42.8–64.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 7.7–16.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 44.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 44.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 41.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 75.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.7%CMS range 3.9–14.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.80 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 59.0 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.35 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.74 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.49 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-08-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a system to provide the correct physician ordered diet texture for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who was at risk for choking and had a history of dysphagia. This resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for R1 when she was provided lunch which was not cut up into bite sized pieces as ordered. As a result, R1 was observed to choke, requiring the Heimlich to clear obstruction, suctioning, and oxygen after she lost consciousness. R1 was transferred to the hospital, was intubated and placed on a ventilator.The IJ began on 7/30/25 at 12:10 p.m., when nursing assistant (NA)-A provided R1 with a lunch tray which included potato chowder with kielbasa pieces and a chicken salad sandwich that were not cut up per physician orders. This resulted in R1 choking and requiring the Heimlich Maneuver, was hospitalized and placed on a ventilator. The Administrator and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the IJ on 8/7/25 at 2:25 p.m. The IJ was removed on 8/7/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to develop and implement a process to ensure high risk medications were administered and failed to implement a process to report missed doses and/or lack of availability of medications to the provider for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for medication errors. This resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for R1 when the facility's failure to obtain and administer anti-epileptic medication (used to treat seizures) resulted in increased seizure activity and hospitalization. The IJ began on 11/16/23, when The facility failed to administer three consecutive doses of a high-risk medication to prevent or reduce the risk of seizures resulting in repetitive seizures and hospitalization for R1. The facility failed to implement a plan to secure the medication at the facility or develop alternative interventions via provider notification. The administrator in training, licensed social worker (LSW) and corporate nurse (CN) were notified of the IJ on 12/1/23, at 3:50…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision when staff did not appropriately respond to a sounding exit door alarm for 1 of 3 residents (R1) identified at risk for elopement, who was able to exit the building, despite wander alert alarming, resulting in R1 being outside the facility without staff knowledge. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R1. The immediate jeopardy began on 9/23/23, at approximately 6:39 p.m. when R1 was found outside the facility by a visitor walking through the parking lot. The IJ was identified on 10/6/23, and the administrator was notified of the IJ on 10/6/23, at 4:15 p.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 9/28/23, and the deficient practice was corrected prior to the start of the survey and was therefore issued at past noncompliance. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], identified severe cognitive impairment, wandering behaviors and indicated she required limited assistance from staff for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents reviewed for safety from hot liquids was free from burns. This resulted in actual harm to R1 who spilled hot coffee on his lap and sustained a second-degree burn. In addition, the facility failed to implement a system to assess residents for safety with hot liquids.Findings include:R1's Resident Face Sheet indicated he admitted to the facility 7/21/23. R1's diagnosis included dementia, aspiration pneumonia, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and insomnia. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], identified severe cognitive impairment and indicated he required set up or clean up assistance to eat.R1's care plan dated 1/11/26, identified a selfcare deficit related to dementia, poor coordination and weakness. The care plan identified a potential for alteration in nutrition and directed staff to assist with set up for meals. The care plan indicated R1 was independent with eating but required supervision and cueing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide exercise programs as ordered for 6 of 6 residents (R14, R20, R32, R40, R53, R66) reviewed for restorative exercise program. This had the potential to affect all 38 residents who had exercise programs.Findings include: R20 R20's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R20 had severe cognitive impairment and required moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), R20 was unable to ambulate. Diagnoses included osteoporosis, Alzheimer's disease, weakness and history of hand and hip fractures. R20's care plan reviewed 3/16/26, identified R20 had decreased physical mobility with a potential for falls due to a left hip fracture. Staff were directed to assist R20 to turn and reposition and transfer to her wheelchair. R20's care plan lacked documentation of a functional maintenance program (FMP). R20's undated Physician Orders identified an order for physical therapy FMP with a start date 10/1/25, and the end…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and document review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to provide exercise services for the restorative nursing program for 6 of 6 residents (R14, R20, R32, R40, R53, R66) reviewed for restorative exercise program. This had the potential to affect all 38 residents who had exercise programs. Findings include:See also F688: Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide exercise programs as ordered for 6 of 6 residents (R14, R20, R32, R40, R53, R66) reviewed for restorative exercise program. This had the potential to affect all 38 residents who had exercise programs. R20:R20's Restorative Care Program identified the following:9/19/25, identified R20 was discharged from occupational therapy (OT) and was to have a restorative program to maintain her upper extremity strength and range of motion of participation in self-care and functional tasks of choice. The restorative aide was directed to completed ten repetitions of shoulder flex, chest press and side to side with a two-pound weight, ten…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure staff served meals while securing their hair with a hair covering on1 of 2 units Walnut Unit) . This had the potential to affect all 23 residents who ate meals on the Walnut Unit.Findings include:According to section 2-402.11 of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food code dated 2017: A hair restraint keeps dislodged hair from ending up in the food and may deter employees from touching their hair. This is crucial to prevent cross-contamination. Staphylococcus aureus is an example of a common pathogen that is found on skin and hair. If enough of the bacteria is ingested, it could cause illness. Common symptoms of this illness include vomiting, nausea, and stomach cramps. During an observation on 4/28/26 at 12:06 p.m., dietary aide (DA)-A was serving meals from the Walnut Grove kitchenette. DA-A leaned over the steam table food containers while setting up the individual resident plates for the noon meal. DA-A was not wearing a hairnet. At 12:15 p.m., DA-A left the kitchenette to deliver food to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a report of missing personal property was followed up on for 1 of 3 residents (R14) reviewed for resident rights.Findings include:R14's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R14 had severe cognitive impairment. Diagnoses included dementia, edema, restlessness and agitation. R14 required set up/clean up assistance with eating, maximal/substantial assistance with dressing, bathing and personal hygiene and was dependent on staff with toileting and putting on and taking off footwear. During an interview on 4/28/26 at 6:09 p.m., family member (FM)-A stated R14's wedding ring went missing a few months ago. FM-A reported the missing wedding ring to the nursing assistants, the cart nurses, registered nurse (RN)-A who was the unit manager and the previous director of nursing (DON) who was no longer at the facility. FM-A stated she was simply told no staff had seen the ring. After the wedding ring was missing for a week,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to revise the care plan to include ordered functional maintenance program (FMP) with goals and interventions for 2 of 6 residents (R20, R32) who received exercises, in addition, the facility include enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) including measurable goals and interventions for 1 of 6 residents (R66) whose care plans were reviewed for EBP. Findings include: R20: R20's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R20 had severe cognitive impairment and required moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), R20 was unable to ambulate. Diagnoses included osteoporosis, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, weakness and history of hand and hip fractures. R20's undated Physician Orders report identified an order for physical therapy FMP with a start date 10/1/25, and the end date was open ended. An order for physical and occupational therapy FMP was also listed with start date 9/26/25 with an open-ended end date. R20's Restorative Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide timely cares to dependent residents for 2 of 7 residents (R14, R18) who's activities of daily living cares were observed. Findings include: R14: R14's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R14 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for toileting. R14 diagnoses included dementia, edema, restlessness and agitation. R14's Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 8/21/25, identified the CAA was triggered due to R14's needing extensive assistance with toileting and frequent incontinence of urine. Staff offer to assist R14 to the restroom or to use his urinal every 2-3 hours and as needed. R14 was at risk for alterations in skin, offensive body odor, falls and bladder infections. Complicated by history of falls, dementia, R14's care plan revised 4/29/26, identified R14 had an alteration in elimination related to dementia with cognitive losses, receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents received timely repositioning for 1 of 3 residents (R14) reviewed for pressure ulcers.Findings include:R14's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R14 had severe cognitive impairment was dependent on staff for repositioning. Diagnoses included dementia, edema, restlessness and agitation. R14's Braden Scale (prediction for pressure ulcer scale) dated 2/13/26, identified R14 was a moderate risk for pressure injury/ulcer.R14's care plan revised 4/29/26, included an intervention to provide assist of one staff to turn and reposition every 2-3 hours.A continuous observation was conducted on 4/29/26 at starting at 8:04 a.m., R14 was seated in his wheelchair and was pedaling himself with his feet up and down the hallway in front of the nurses' station. R14 was dressed and groomed for the day. R14 stated he didn't know if he had eaten breakfast yet and pointed at the other residents in the dining room through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a stop date for medication was confirmed by the primary care provider for temporary medications that required an end date for 1 of 6 residents (R12) reviewed for medication management.Findings include:R12's five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R12 had intact cognition. R12 received injectable medication for all seven days of the observation period and received anticoagulant medication. A complete drug regimen review was completed, and no potentially clinically significant medication issues were noted. Diagnoses included diabetes, fracture of the right femur, altered mental status, calculus of the kidney, hydronephrosis and metabolic encephalopathy.R12's Interagency Transfer Orders dated 4/15/26, identified an order for enoxaparin (a blood thinner) 40 milligram (mg) syringe, inject 0.4 millimeters (ml) under the skin every night to prevent deep vein thrombosis for diagnosis of total right hip arthroplasty. The quantity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and served to meet resident needs for 1 of 2 residents (R12) reviewed for nutrition. Findings include:R12's Speech Therapy Daily Note dated 3/16/25, recommended general precautions to include resident seated at 90 degrees for all oral intake, one to one assist to follow safe swallow strategies of small bites/sips, slow rate, alternate bites/sips and only feed resident when she is alert. R12's five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R12 had intact cognition and required set up assistance with eating. R12's care plan dated 4/27/26, identified a potential for alteration in nutrition with a goal to maintain independence with eating after set up. Staff were directed to assist to setup meals as needed. R12 should be sitting upright as close to 90 degrees as possible when eating in bed. Staff were to encourage R12 to sit up in wheelchair with eating. R12's Physician Orders with print date 4/29/26,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure staff wore the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) according to CDC guidelines during direct cares for 2 of 4 residents (R25, R66) reviewed who were on enhanced barrier precautions.Findings include:R25R25's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R25 had an indwelling Foley catheter and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL's) including catheter care. R25's had a diagnosis of renal insufficiency.R25's care plan dated 3/6/25, identified R25 was at risk for infection due to his indwelling catheter and staff were to wear PPE, including gown and gloves, when caring for R25.On 4/27/26 at 1:45 p.m., nursing assistant (NA)-C exited R25's bathroom wearing gloves and was holding a urine collection graduate. NA-C bent down next to R25 and drained urine from the catheter drainage bag into the graduate. NA-C stood, walked into the bathroom and emptied the urine into the toilet. NA-C failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the correct administration of insulin per physician orders for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who received 20 units of Novolog (rapid acting used to lower blood sugar levels onset in 15 minutes) instead of the physician ordered Lantus (long-acting onset 3 to 4 hours and duration of 24 hours). Findings included: R1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition with no behaviors. Her diagnoses include diabetes mellitus (DM) and received insulin injections 7 out of 7 days a week. R1's care plan dated 9/18/25, identified a potential for alteration in nutrition related to obesity, diabetes, and chronic pain. Staff were directed to offer snacks two times a day. Medicate as ordered. Follow diabetic protocols. Monitor continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) as ordered. Monitor for signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia/hyperglycemia (low blood/high blood sugars). R1's physician orders identified: -Start date 3/21/25, bedside glucose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured at all times in 1 of 3 medication carts used. This had the potential to affect 20 residents whose medications were stored in medication cart. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure medication was labeled with clear and unaltered administration instructions to prevent potential error for 1 of 3 residents (R4) observed to receive medication.Findings include:R4's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], diagnosis: multiple sclerosis (MS) (a chronic autoimmune disease affects the central nervous system damaging the protective covering of nerve fibers with symptoms of muscle weakness, spasms or stiffness, and problems with balance and coordination). R4's provider order dated 9/6/25, identified: -Baclofen (muscle relaxant) tablet 20 milligrams (mg); amount 1 1/2 tabs (30mg); oral twice a day 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. -Baclofen tablet 20 mg 1 tablet oral twice a day 12:00 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. Special…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect of care to the state agency (SA) for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed who alleged neglect of care.R1's Resident Face Sheet indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's diagnosis included atrial fibrillation, adult failure to thrive and hypertension. R1's Individual Resident Care Plan dated 6/19/25, indicated she required assistance with repositioning, toileting and wheelchair mobility and displayed no behaviors. R1's Progress Note dated 6/22/25, indicated R1's family spoke with nurse regarding R1's condition. R1's family insisted R1 be sent to the emergency department because they felt facility's care of R1 was poor. R1 had not been eating or drinking much and refusing to take her medications. Family asked for boxes to pack up R1's belongings and said they would not be bringing R1 back to the facility. R1's Progress Note dated 6/23/25, indicated social services designee (SSD) called and spoke with R1's family…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to utilize assistance devices (transfer belt) and provide a hazard free environment as care planned for 3 of 4 residents (R1, R3, R4) reviewed for falls. Findings include: R1's Resident Face Sheet indicated she admitted to the facility 8/21/24, with diagnosis that included fracture of left scapula, weakness, moderate dementia and back pain. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and indicated she had upper extremity impairments to one side. The MDS indicated R1 required substantial to maximal assistance to transfer and stand and indicated ambulation was not attempted due to medical condition or safety concerns. R1's MDS indicated she had sustained two or more falls since the prior assessment with no injury and two or more falls with minor injury. R1's care plan dated 6/5/25, identified a risk for falls and decreased physical mobility related to left shoulder injury, muscle weakness and inability to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure water temperatures were maintained a comfortable temperature for 2 of 13 residents (R22 ,R45) who resided on Maple Lane unit reviewed for complaints of cold-water temperatures. This had the potential to affect all 13 residents residing who resided on Maple Lane unit. Findings include: R22's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R22 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for bathing, dressing and grooming. R45's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified R45 had moderate cognitive impairment and was independent with dressing and grooming and required supervision with bathing. During interview on 2/10/25, at 1:45 p.m. family member (FM)-H stated R22 did not have hot water in his room. Staff had to take R22 to another wing in the facility for his showers as there wasn't any hot water on the wing R22 resided. FM-H felt it was terrible the residents had to wash up in cold water and were carted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure flooring was maintained in a safe manner for 1 of 1 resident (R49) reviewed for environment. Findings include: R49's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified moderate cognitive impairment and had non-Alzheimer's dementia. During observation on 2/11/25 at 8:42 a.m., the floor in R49's room had a black substance built up on the seams between the flooring tiles in the room which covered approximately 50 percent of the floor. When walking on the black substance between the seams would stick to your shoes. During an interview on 2/12/25 at 11:44 a.m., housekeepers (HSK)-A and HSK-B stated R49's room was cleaned about three days a week and included sweeping and mopping the floor. They stated the stuff coming up between the tiles was sticky and not sure if it was cleanable. HSK-A and HSK-B stated sometimes they can get a little bit of it to come off, but within a couple of days more sticky stuff would come up through the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to accurately code a significant weight loss on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 of 3 residents (R30) reviewed for nutrition Findings include: R30's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified R30 had a severe cognitive impairment and diagnoses t included diabetes, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body), chronic kidney disease, dysphasia (difficulty swallowing food or liquids) and aphasia (a comprehension and communication (reading, speaking, or writing) disorder resulting from damage or injury to the specific area in the brain). R30's weight was 153 pounds (lbs.) and R30 had no loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in last 6 months. R30's medical records identified the following weights: - 7/14/24 172.5 lbs. - 1/3/25 153.3 lbs. Which is a 11.13 percent decrease in weight in 180 days. R30's Mini Nutrition assessment dated [DATE], identified the registered dietician would continue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan to ensure immediate resident needs were identified and addressed for 1 of 4 residents (R211) whom were newly admitted . Findings include: R211's Discharge summary dated [DATE], identified R211 was hospitalized for acute blood loss anemia and acute knee pain due to gout. R211's bleeding resolved and was restarted on anticoagulant medications as well as gout medications to treat his left knee pain. R211's progress note dated 1/24/25, identified R21 arrived at the facility to be admitted . R21 had a foley catheter in place, which would remain until his urology appointment in March. R21 had experienced a lot of falls at home prior to admission and would need assist of one and walker with ambulation. On 2/11/25, at 8:14 a.m. R211 was observed sitting in a recliner watching television in his room. The door to the room was open and R211's foley catheter bag was visible attached to the side of his recliner. R211's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed identify enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) interventions for 1 of 1 resident (R18) reviewed with a surgical wound. Findings include: R18's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R18 was admitted on [DATE], was cognitively intact and was receiving surgical wound care. R18's orders report dated 1/24/25, identified staff were to monitor R18's dressing placement and for signs and symptoms of infection such as increased redness, warmth, swelling, drainage, or generalized fever over 101. Staff were to notify the charge nurse so they could notify the provider. R18's care plan revised 2/12/25, identified R18 recently had a hip replacement and required staff to complete dressing changes and monitor and report any signs or symptoms of infection. The plan further identified R18 required assist of one staff for transfers, toileting and dressing. However, the plan failed to address R18's need for EBP. During observation on 2/10/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to revise and update a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 3 residents (R10) reviewed for weight loss. Findings include: R10's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R10 was cognitively intact and required set-up assistance for eating, and had a weight loss that was not a physician-prescribed weight-loss regimen. R10's progress notes, identified the following: - 10/16/24, registered dietician (RD)-A identified R10 weighed 115 lbs. and had been drinking a nutritional supplement daily. RD-A's recommendations included staff to offer and provide high calorie, high protein shakes. - 11/5/24 RD-A identified R10's weight had been stable for one week and recommendations included high caloric foods per patient request and continue to follow up and monitor weights. - 11/12/24 RD-A identified staff were to provide alternate meals upon request, offer high calorie/high protein shakes, food items to help promote weight gain, and to monitor intake and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a bed was kept in the low position to prevent falls for 1 of 2 residents (R40) reviewed for falls. Findings include: R40's Falls Risk assessment dated [DATE], identified R40 was at high risk for falls. R40's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R40 had moderate cognitive impairment and a diagnosis of unspecified convulsions. R40 required substantial/maximal assistance to roll left and right. R40's care plan revised 12/19/24, identified R40 had decreased physical mobility with potential for falls related to lower extremity weakness, impaired mobility related to general muscle weakness and poor coordination manifested by inability to transfer, wheel self, turn and reposition self, sit up, lie down or get feet and legs into bed independently. R40 was unable to ambulate. The care plan directed to follow fall interventions as listed in nursing orders. R40's nursing order dated 2/6/25, identified R40's fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and implement interventions to prevent weight loss for 1 of 3 residents (R30); and failed to implement assessess nutrition interventions to prevent further weight loss for 1 of 3 residents (R10) reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: R30: R30's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified R30 had severe cognitive impairment and diagnoses included diabetes, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body), chronic kidney disease, dysphasia (difficulty swallowing food or liquids) and aphasia (a comprehension and communication (reading, speaking, or writing) disorder resulting from damage or injury to the specific area in the brain). R30's weight was 153 pounds (lbs) and R30 had no loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in last 6 months. R30's Mini Nutrition assessment dated [DATE], identified the registered dietician would continue R30's current plan of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a complete medical record was maintained to include the physician reviewed orders, treatments and care plans during routine visits for 1 of 2 residents (R7) reviewed during medication administration. Findings include: R7's undated Resident Face Sheet identified admission date 6/13/24. Diagnoses included epilepsy, diabetes, pain, autistic disorder, fibromyalgia and chronic kidney disease. R7's Physician Order Report dated 10/7/24 to 1/7/25, lacked complete orders. The signed physician order report identified 12 ordered medications on page one and two of the documents. Of the 12 orders, only nine were legible as the document had faded and incomplete printed areas over the pages. R7's activities of daily living (ADL) order with start date 8/15/20, appeared to order a non-pharmaceutical intervention for pain, however, was illegible as the scanning was faded and incomplete in areas. Pages three and four of the order report were not available. When interviewed on 2/12/25, at 11:52 a.m. the medical records staff member…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure long term residents received routine physician visits every 60 days as required for 2 of 2 residents (R7, R39) reviewed during medication administration. Findings include: R7: R7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R7 had intact cognition. Diagnoses included epilepsy, diabetes, pain, autistic disorder, polyneuropathy, fibromyalgia, conduct disorder, and chronic kidney disease. R7's medical record identified R7 had physician visits for his primary care on 7/26/24 and 1/8/25. R7's medical record lacked documentation of routine 60 day visits for 165 days, from 7/26/24 to 1/8/25. During interview on 2/12/25, at 11:52 a.m. the medical record staff (MR)-F stated she was only able to find documentation of physician visits July 25, 2024 and January 8, 2024. It appeared a visit had been scheduled in September and November 2024, however the visits were not completed or billed. MR-F thought they must have been canceled for some…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and implement interventions for identified behaviors for 1 of 3 residents (R17) reviewed for dementia care. Findings include: R39's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R39 had a severe cognitive impairment, R39 used antipsychotic medication daily and exhibited no hallucinations, delusions or behaviors during the assessment period and had a diagnosis of dementia. R39's Cognitive Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 8/21/24, identfiied R38 was unable to complete BIMS interview. R39 was at risk for alteration in thought process with potential for anxiety, falls, and decreased mobility related to cognitive decline secondary to unspecified dementia.Would proceed to anticpate R39 needs and intervene when making poor decisions. R39's care plan revised 11/26/24, identified R39 had alteration in thought process with potential for anxiety related dementia and nursing home placement manifested by impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure as needed medication from facility standing orders were transcribed and administered appropriately to reduce the risk of complications for 1 of 1 resident (R56) reviewed for loose stools. Findings include: R56's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R56 had mild cognitive impairment and was continent of both bowel and bladder with no constipation present. A diagnosis of diarrhea was included. R56's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 2/1/25 to 2/10/25, identified loperamide (an antidiarrheal) OTC (over the counter) medication was added on 2/5/25. Instructions were for loperamide 2 milligrams (mg) to be administered four times per day for diarrhea. Special instructions instructed to give 2 mg of the medication after each loose stool, not to exceed 8 mg in a 24-hour period. The medication was scheduled to be given every day at 8:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m., 4:00 p.m., and 8:00 p.m. Staff initialed the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure consulting pharmacist recommendations were acted upon, addressed, and documented in the medical record for 1 of 5 residents (R51) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R5 had intact cognition. Diagnoses included paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, heart disease, and secondary hypertension. R5's Physician Order Report signed 10/9/24, identified R5's current medication regimen with their corresponding start dates and included the following: Eliquis (an anticoagulant) 2.5 milligrams (mg) two times per day, aspirin (reduces the formation of blood clots) 81 mg every day, and Diltiazem (to prevent chest pain) 120 mg every day. R5's Consultant Pharmacist's Medication Review dated August 2024, identified R5's medication regimen had been reviewed by the consulting pharmacist (CP) and listed an irregularity regarding the medication Diltiazem. The CP comment included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide a face-to-face provider evaluation for continued use of a as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication for 1 of 2 residents (R39) reviewed for mood/behavior. Findings include: R39's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R39 had severe cognitive impairment. R39 used antipsychotic medication daily and exhibited no hallucinations, delusions or behaviors during the assessment period. R39 had a diagnosis of dementia. R39's Physician order dated 1/21/25, identified Zyprexa (olanzapine) (an antipsychotic medication) 2.5 milligram (mg) tablets. Give 2.5 mg by mouth once a day as needed. Used for behaviors. Add note when given. Okay to stand until next face to face visit. R39's electronic medication administration record (EMAR) dated January 2025, identified R39 received Zyprexa 2. 5mg PRN on the following days; - On 1/23/25 at 2:36 a.m. for other - On 1/25/25 at 4:13 p.m. for behavior issues yelling at table R39's EMAR dated February…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 1 of 1 resident (R211) reviewed for catheter care; and 1 of 1 resident (R18) reviewed with a surgical wound. Findings include: A CDC Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs) manual, dated 7/2022, identified MDRO transmission within a nursing home was common and contributed to substantial resident morbidity and mortality. The feature outlined EBP were defined as, . expand the use of PPE and refer to the use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of MDROs to staff hands and clothing . MDROs may be indirectly transferred from resident-to-resident during these high-contact care activities . residents with wounds and indwelling medical devices are at especially high risk of both acquisition of and colonization with MDROs. The feature…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to notify the physician of a change in condition for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who was sleeping more than usual, not eating and not taking medications. Findings include: R1's Resident Face Sheet identified diagnosis that included dementia with behavioral disturbance, depression, hypertensive kidney disease, open wound and agitation. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severe cognitive impairment and indicated she displayed no rejection of care behaviors during the basement period. The MDS indicated R1 was able to eat independently after set up and weighed 116 pounds. R1's care plan dated 3/25/24, identified a self care deficit related to dementia and decreased physical mobility. The care plan indicated R1 did not ambulate and required assist of two staff for transfers. The care plan identified an alteration in nutrition related to a poor appetite at times, pain and cognitive dysfunction. The care plan indicated R1 was able to feed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to identify and assess for a change of condition for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who began sleeping more, missing medications due to sleep and not drinking/eating regularly. Additionally, R1's family member had to voice concerns regarding deteriorating health condition for initiation of hospital transfer. Findings include: R1's Resident Face Sheet identified diagnosis that included dementia with behavioral disturbance, depression, hypertensive kidney disease, open wound and agitation. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severe cognitive impairment and indicated she displayed no rejection of care behaviors during the basement period. The MDS indicated R1 was able to eat independently after set up and weighed 116 pounds. R1's care plan dated 3/25/24, identified a self care deficit related to dementia and decreased physical mobility. The care plan indicated R1 did not ambulate and required assist of two staff for transfers. The care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to assess the use of a wedge cushion used to keep a resident (R1) in bed as a potential restraint for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for rights. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated R1 had two or more falls since the last assessment date and did not use restraints. R1's care area assessment (CAA) dated 12/6/23, identified multiple falls and indicated after medication adjustments R1 was more alert and moved around more. The CAA indicated R1 was restless and liked to fidget with things. The CAA identified fall interventions that included a contour mattress, low bed against the wall and a wedge cushion to position in bed. R1's care plan dated 3/18/24, identified decreased physical mobility with potential for falls. The care plan identified general weakness, poor coordination, restlessness and impulsive behaviors. The care plan indicated R1 was unable to turn…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-05 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespreadEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure nutrient and/or calorie substantive snacks were offered and readily available for 3 of 6 residents (R6, R50, R308) who voiced concern at a resident council meeting. This had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. In addition, the facility failed to prevent a greater than 14-hour lapse between dinner and breakfast meals and without offering a snack in the evening. Findings include: During a resident council meeting on 4/3/24 at 2:00 p.m., the following residents stated concerns with recent changes to the snack cart: R6, whose quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified intact cognition, stated the facility hardly ever comes around with snacks. They used to, but the cart went away. R308, whose admission MDS dated [DATE] identified moderately impaired cognition, added they didn't come around at all with the snack cart. R50, whose quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified moderately impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported for 1 of 6 residents (R28) reviewed for abuse. This had the potential to affect residents who he provided care for. Findings include: R28's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R28 had diagnoses which included anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, and secondary Parkinsonism (when symptoms similar to Parkinson disease are caused by certain medicines, a different nervous system disorder or another illness). In addition, R28's MDS identified she was cognitively intact, was understood by others and was able to understand others, and further identified she had no rejections of care, delusions, or hallucinations. R28's care plan dated 4/20/20, identified R28 as a vulnerable adult, one of the listed interventions was to invite designated family to care conferences, encourage family and resident to voice question or concerns. During an interview on 4/1/24 at 3:32 p.m., R28 stated there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were investigated for 1 of 6 residents (R28) reviewed for abuse. This had the potential to affect residents who he provided care for. Findings include: R28's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R28 had diagnoses which included anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, and secondary Parkinsonism (when symptoms similar to Parkinson disease are caused by certain medicines, a different nervous system disorder or another illness). In addition, R28's MDS identified she was cognitively intact, was understood by others and was able to understand others and further identified she had no rejections of care, delusions, or hallucinations. R28's care plan dated 4/20/20, identified R28 as a vulnerable adult, one of the listed interventions was to invite designated family to care conferences, encourage family and resident to voice question or concerns. During an interview on 4/1/24 at 3:32 p.m., R28 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0729 — patternVerify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review and interview the facility failed to verify nurse aide registration for 1 of 5 nursing assistants (NA-A) prior to allowing the individual to serve as a nurse aide and work directly with residents in the facility after the 4 month training period. This had the potential to affect residents who he provided care for. Findings include: Review of NA-A's personnel file identified date of hire as 10/23/23, and placed on an investigatory suspension on 4/1/24. No verification of NA-A nursing assistant certification was located in the personnel file. A search of the nursing assistant registry revealed he was not currently registered. During an interview on 4/5/24 at 9:22 a.m., the administrator stated NA-A took his nursing assistant skills test on 12/22/23, but did not take his knowledge test related to a communication misunderstanding between the testing site and the facility. NA-A showed the facility proof of passing the skills test after the testing date. The administrator stated it was an expectation that after the four month training period a nursing assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff observed medication administration for 1 of 1 residents (R30) observed to self-administer a nebulizer treatment who was not assessed to be able to do so. Findings include: R30's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R30's diagnoses included aphasia (a language disorder caused by damage in a specific area of the brain that controls language expression and comprehension), asthma, anxiety, depression, and morbid obesity. R30's MDS identified her as severely cognitively impaired, with behaviors (verbal/vocal symptoms, disruptive sounds), rarely/never was understood, and rarely understood others. R30's current Physician Order Report dated 4/5/24, identified R30 had an order for albuterol sulfate solution (used to treat wheezing and shortness of breath caused by breathing problems such as asthma) for nebulization 2.5 milligrams (mg) per 3 milliliters (ml) for inhalation for moderate persistent asthma…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure conflicting directives for emergency care and treatment were clarified to ensure resident wishes would be implemented correctly in an emergent situation for 1 of 15 residents (R28) reviewed for advanced directives. Finding include: R28's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R28 had diagnoses which included anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, and secondary Parkinsonism (when symptoms similar to Parkinson disease are caused by certain medicines, a different nervous system disorder or another illness). In addition, R28's MDS identified she was cognitively intact, was understood by others and was able to understand others and further identified she had no rejections of care, delusions, or hallucinations. On [DATE] at 12:36 p.m., R28's electronic medical record (EMR) identified her as do not resuscitate (DNR) on her face sheet. On [DATE] at 12:37 p.m., a review of R28's Uniform Code Level Directions for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the long term care ombudsman was notified of resident transfers for 1 of 2 residents (R26) reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: R26's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R26 had diagnoses which included dementia, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), seizure disorder, and depression. R26's MDS identified she was cognitively intact. R26's progress notes revealed the following: -11/16/23, identified R26 was sent to the hospital at approximately 7:05 p.m -1/13/24, identified R26 was sent to the hospital at approximately 4:15 p.m R26's medical record lacked evidence notification was sent to the state ombudsman's office regarding the transfers to the hospital. An email communication from the ombudsman dated 4/4/24, indicated the ombudsman's office had not received any communications regarding hospitalizations since 4/2021. During an interview on 4/4/24 at 1:56 p.m., social worker (SW)-A stated the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide the resident or their representative a written bed hold notice for 1 of 2 residents (R26) reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: R26's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R26 had diagnoses which included dementia, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), seizure disorder, and depression. R26's MDS identified she was cognitively intact. R26's progress notes revealed the following: -11/16/23, identified R26 was sent to the hospital at approximately 7:05 p.m -1/13/24, identified R26 was sent to the hospital at approximately 4:15 p.m R26's medical record lacked evidence written notification was given to the resident or the resident's representative for either hospitalization. During an interview on 4/4/24 at 12:46 p.m., nurse consultant (NC)-A stated residents would sign a bed hold on admission to designate if they would want their bed held in the future. During an interview on 4/4/24 at 1:38 p.m., social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure residents who were at risk for pressure ulcers were repositioned timely as directed by the residents care plan for 1 of 2 residents (R30) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: R30's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R30's diagnoses included aphasia (a language disorder caused by damage in a specific area of the brain that controls language expression and comprehension), asthma, anxiety, depression, and morbid obesity. R30's MDS identified her as severely cognitively impaired, with behaviors (verbal/vocal symptoms, disruptive sounds), rarely/never was understood, and rarely understood others. In addition, R30's MDS identified she was at risk for pressure ulcers and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R30's care plan dated 11/29/21, identified R30 had an alteration in elimination. Interventions included to check for incontinence every two to three hours. R30's care plan indicated R30 was at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure nebulizer and tubing were changed in a timely manner for 1 of 1 residents (R30) reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: R30's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R30's diagnoses included aphasia (a language disorder caused by damage in a specific area of the brain that controls language expression and comprehension), asthma, anxiety, depression, and morbid obesity. R30's MDS identified her as severely cognitively impaired, with behaviors (verbal/vocal symptoms, disruptive sounds), rarely/never was understood, and rarely understood others. In addition, R30's MDS identified she was receiving oxygen therapy. R30's care plan dated 11/29/21, did not address respiratory care and/or nebulizer treatments. R30's Physician Order report dated 3/5/24-4/5/24, did not address care and changing of nebulizer and tubing. R30's medical record lacked direction and/or documentation for nebulizer and tubing changes.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders for 2 of 6 residents (R30, R39) observed to receive medication. A total of two errors out of 27 opportunities were identified resulting in a facility error rate of seven percent. Findings include: R30: R30's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R30's diagnoses included aphasia (a language disorder caused by damage in a specific area of the brain that controls language expression and comprehension), asthma, anxiety, depression, and morbid obesity. R30's MDS identified her as severely cognitively impaired, with behaviors (verbal/vocal symptoms, disruptive sounds), rarely/never was understood, and rarely understood others. R30's current Physician Order Report dated 4/5/24, identified R30 had an order for albuterol sulfate solution (used to treat wheezing and shortness of breath caused by breathing problems such as asthma) for nebulization 2.5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications with a shortened expiration period were labeled with an opened-on date and failed to ensure expired medications were disposed for one of two medication carts in the facility. This practice had the potential to affect all residents with medications stored in the facility. Findings include: R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. R2's provider orders dated 5/6/22, identified an order for Flonase Allergy Relief, one spray to each nostril two times per day related allergic rhinitis. R13's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified moderately intact cognition and a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). R13's provider orders dated 5/3/23, identified an order for albuterol sulfate inhaler 90 micrograms (mcg) per actuation. Gve one to two puffs every four to six hours as needed for shortness of breath. During an observation on 4/5/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to assess 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for nursing care assessment. While receiving assistance with a transfer, staff heard an audible tear which was not assessed by nursing staff on duty at the time of the incident. Findings include: R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], identified severe cognitive impairment and indicated she required total assistance from two staff to complete bed mobility and transfers. R4's care plan dated 4/11/23, identified impaired physical mobility related to Multiple Sclerosis, obesity and an inability to transfer. The care plan directed staff to provide assistance from two staff for bed mobility and provide total assistance from two staff for transfers using a bariatric ceiling lift. A report to the state agency (SA) dated 6/22/23, indicated on the morning of 6/22/23, nursing staff reported to unit manager that R4 appeared to have some swelling and increased pain to her right shoulder. Unit manager assessed R4 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$137,245 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $88,970 — penalty dated 2026-01-16
- $26,685 — penalty dated 2025-06-11
- $13,397 — penalty dated 2023-12-04
- $8,193 — penalty dated 2023-09-21
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-02-13 for 34 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BIRCHEM, JAMES | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | 50% | since 05/29/1994 |
| BIRCHEM, KATHLEEN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | 50% | since 01/20/2026 |
| JARVIS, STEFFANIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2017 |
| ELDERCARE OF MINNESOTA, INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/15/2005 |
| ERICKSON, LAURA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/21/2024 |
| WILCOX, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/09/2026 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $219K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245397. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.