Minnesota Masonic Home Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 703 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 357 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 194 beds and averages 160.9 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.53 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.44 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.87 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.72 to 1.06 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the D1 unit shower room was maintained in a clean, sanitary manner when 25% of the shower walls were observed to be covered with unidentified pink matter. This had the potential to affect 27 of the 29 residents who resided on D1 and utilized the shower room on a routine basis.Findings include:During observation on 2/11/26 at 9 a.m., pink matter deposits were observed on the shower walls. The shower walls were covered with white tiles, and the pink matter was observed over the caulking lines and the baseboard tiles. The water knob/handle was covered with white calcium-like deposits, and there was a chrome fixture with rust-colored spots and a rust-colored stain on one of the walls right below the chrome fixture. Two plastic brushes with long handles were on the shower floor. Both brushes had pink matter on the base of the bristles. A clear plastic bag was knotted to the handheld shower head, the bag had pink matter on both ends.During observation and interview on 9/11/26 at 9:22 a.m., nursing assistant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to accommodate resident needs by ensuring the call light was accessible for 2 of 2 residents (R144, and R45) reviewed for call lights. Findings include: R144 R144's annual comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R144 had severe cognitive impairment, had no behaviors and didn't refuse cares. MDS indicated she had bilaterally impaired range of motion, needed substantial assistance with showers, upper body dressing, transfers and bed mobility. MDS also indicated R144 was dependent on toileting hygiene, bathing, lower body dressing and oral hygiene. R144's diagnosis list dated 2/12/26, indicated diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, dementia, left shoulder pain, dysphagia, atherosclerosis, muscle weakness, and tremors. R144's falls care plan dated 2/12/26 identified R144 at risk of falls. The care plan directed staff to be sure R144's call light was within reach, and to encourage her to use it for assistance. R144 needed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to revise the care plan to include the methods staff utilized and found effective for behavioral de-escalation for 1 of 1 residents (R101) reviewed for behavioral symptoms of dementia. Findings include:R101's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R101 had severely impaired cognition and a diagnosis of dementia. The MDS indicated R101 was dependent on staff for most activities of daily living. R101's care plan dated 3/27/25, indicated that R101 was resistant to care and taking medications, as well as having delusional thoughts at times. The care plan had the following interventions:-Dated 5/9/24, keep the resident's routine consistent and try to provide consistent caregivers as much as possible to decrease confusion.-Dated 5/13/24, allow the resident to make decisions about the treatment regimen to provide a sense of control/choice and encourage the resident when she accepts staff assistance.-Dated 10/3/24, cue, reorient,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure residents using a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine had appropriate orders for use to include equipment setting and humidification as appropriate for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R91, and R150) reviewed for respiratory equipment. Findings include: R1 R1's significant change in status (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R1 with intact cognition, required substantial assistance for toileting, dressing, and hygiene. In addition, diagnoses include heart failure, kidney disease, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and dependence on oxygen. Also, R1 receiving hospice services (end of life care). R1's physician orders dated 11/26/25 identified: Continuous Positive Air Pressure (CPAP) at home settings, on at hour of sleep (HS), off in morning (AM), for dx: OSA. R1's care plan dated 12/10/25 identified CPAP on at pre-programmed settings when sleeping. No settings were identified. R1's medical record failed to identify…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at palatable temperatures for 1 of 1 residents (R31) who were observed to be served and expressed concerns about inappropriate food temperature.Findings include:R31R31's admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R31 with intact cognition.During interview with R31 on 2/10/26 at 2:06 p.m., R31 stated, I have a problem with 90% of the time [when food] gets here it is lukewarm.During breakfast meal service to R31 room on 2/11/26 at 8:10 a.m., dietary aide (DA)-B was asked to obtain temperature of R31 food prior to bringing meal tray into her room. Both DA-B and licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A verified the glass of milk was 51 degrees Fahrenheit (F), and oatmeal was 136 degrees F. DA-B stated, milk should be at 40 [degrees F] or below and oatmeal should be over 140 [degrees F]. DA-B stated importance of serving food at proper temp ,to make sure [residents] don't get sick. LPN-A unable to state acceptable temperature…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were followed for 1 of 1 resident (R8), reviewed for EBP. Findings include:R8's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R8 had moderate cognitive impairment, did not refuse cares, needed substantial assistance with dressing, bed mobility and was dependent with toileting hygiene and bathing.R8's medical diagnosis report dated 2/11/26, indicated diagnoses of urinary tract infection, type 2 diabetes, retention of urine, chronic kidney disease stage 2, lumbar vertebra compression fracture and hypertension.R8's physician orders record dated 2/11/26, included and order for an indwelling catheter.R8's care plan dated 2/11/26, indicated R8 was on EBP due to having a foley catheter and a chronic wound. R8's care plan indicated the EBP protected R8 from drug-resistant infection and instructed staff to use a gown and gloves during identified high-risk cares. During observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure care-planned interventions to promote appropriate fluid balance were consistently implemented and accurately tracked to promote continuity of care for 1 of 1 resident (R15) reviewed who received hemodialysis and was on a fluid restriction. Findings include: A National Kidney Foundation (NKF) Fluid Overload in a Dialysis Patient feature, dated 2024, identified fluid overload in a dialysis patient occurs when too much water builds up within the body. The feature added, It can cause swelling, high blood pressure, breathing problems, and heart issues. The feature explained, When you are on dialysis, your kidneys are no longer able to keep the right balance of fluid in your body . That's why it's so important to limit how much sodium (salt) and fluid you have between dialysis treatments, adding further, Follow the fluid guidelines [bolded] given to you . Most dialysis patients need to limit their fluid intake to 32 ounces per day.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to follow physician orders, or notify the provider of resident's refusal for 1 of 1 residents (R88) reviewed for cervical collar use. In addition, the facility failed to implement and reassess an individualized bowel management (BM) protocol for 1 of 1 resident (R60) reviewed for constipation. Findings include: R88's face sheet, printed on 12/17/24, included diagnoses of posterior displaced type II dens fracture (involving the area of the dens between the inferior aspect of the anterior C1 vertebrae {upper neck} which occurs due to forces such as trauma and can be life threatening due to its proximity to the spinal cord and brainstem) , Alzheimer's disease, and dementia. R88's significant change Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated R88 had severe cognitive impairment with delirium including inattention that fluctuates, but no behaviors including rejection of care. In addition it documented R88 required substantial to maximal assistance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess wounds including measurements weekly for 1 of 3 residents (R52) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: R52's Diagnosis Report, dated 12/18/24, included diagnoses of infection and inflammatory reaction to internal right knee prosthesis (artificial joint), type 2 diabetes mellitus with neuropathy (nerve pain), osteomyelitis (infection of the bone) of right ankle and foot, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (type of bacteria that many antibiotics don't work on) and peripheral vascular disease (slow and progressive disorder of narrowing of blood vessels, usually in legs). R52's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R52 was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff for toileting, bathing, and required, substantial to maximal assistance with bed mobility and transfers. The MDS documented R52 was high risk for pressure ulcers and currently had one unstageable pressure ulcer due to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to immediately report incidents of potential resident to resident sexual abuse to the state agency (SA) within two hours, as required for 2 of 2 residents (R97, R112) reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R97's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R97 had moderately impaired cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, tool used to determine cognition level) score of 11 and required maximal assistance with lower body dressing and moderate assistance with upper body dressing and bathing. R97's significant change MDS dated [DATE], indicated R97 had moderately impaired cognition with a BIMS score of nine and required maximal assistance with dressing, bathing, turning in bed, and moving from a lying to a sitting position. R97's Diagnosis Report dated 9/8/23, indicated diagnoses of a stroke with resulting right-sided weakness and cognitive dysfunction, kidney disease, and diabetes with vision decline. R97's care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN