Saint Therese At Oxbow Lake

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

70.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 259 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 118 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.63 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 64 beds and averages 59.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.01 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.92 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.21 to 1.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised for 6 of 14 residents (R5, R8, R10, R40, R47 and R7) whose care plans were reviewed for accuracy.Findings include: R5 R5's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R5 had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs). R5's diagnoses included non-traumatic brain dysfunction, Alzheimer's disease, hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar due to impaired insulin regulation), arthritis (joint inflammation causing pain and stiffness), other fractures (history of bone fractures), anxiety disorder (excessive worry or fear), depression (persistent feelings of sadness), metabolic encephalopathy (altered brain function due to metabolic imbalance) and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (intermittent irregular heart rhythm). The MDS indicated R5 had experienced one fall with a major injury and was dependent will all transfers. R5's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received an ongoing program of activities designed to meet their assessed needs, interests, and abilities in accordance with their comprehensive care plans for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for activities (R6, R10, R13, and R42).Findings include:R6R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R6 had intact cognition. R6's diagnoses included arthritis (joint inflammation causing pain and stiffness), macular degeneration (loss of central vision), overactive bladder (frequent or urgent need to urinate), cervicalgia (neck pain) and sensorineural hearing loss - bilateral (permanent hearing loss in both ears). Observations of R6 were conducted on multiple occasions during the survey:On 2/23/26 at 11:14 a.m., R6 was observed sitting in her recliner with her legs elevated, eyes closed, and mouth open. No activity materials or staff interaction were present.On 2/24/26 at 11:39 a.m., R6 was observed sitting in her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity and respect by maintaining privacy of a urinary catheter drainage bag, resulting in the visible exposure of urine to others passing by for 1 of 1 resident observed (R10).Findings include: R10's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R10 had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). R10's diagnoses included stroke (a condition in which blood flow to the brain is interrupted or reduced causing brain cell damage), atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often rapid heart rhythm that can increase the risk of stroke and heart-related complications), heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart is unable to pump blood effectively), hypertension (chronically elevated blood pressure), peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory disorder that causes narrowing or blockage of blood vessels outside of the heart and brain), gastroesophageal reflux…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided the opportunity to participate in the planning of their care through timely care conferences for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for care planning (R8 and R19).Findings include:R8R8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R8 had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). R8's diagnoses included non-traumatic brain dysfunction (impaired brain function affecting cognition or behavior not caused by physical injury); vascular dementia - severe - without behavioral, psychological, mood, or anxiety disturbances (advanced cognitive decline caused by impaired blood flow to the brain); hypertension (chronically elevated blood pressure); arthritis (joint inflammation causing pain and reduced mobility); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (chronic lung disease causing airflow limitation and breathing difficulty); paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (intermittent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure discharge against medical advice (AMA) was documented for 1 of 1 residents (R76) reviewed for discharge. R76's entry minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R76 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R76 admitted from a hospital stay. R76's discharge MDS dated [DATE], indicated R76 had an unplanned discharge. R76 had diagnoses that included lumbar vertebra compression fracture, depression, hallucinations, and peripheral vascular disease. Progress note dated 12/18/25, at 2:10 p.m. indicated R76 admitted to facility following hospitalization. Progress note dated 12/18/25, at 7:06 p.m. indicated R76 had gotten agitated and physically aggressive towards staff. Staff attempted to redirect but unsuccessful. Resident was noted attempting unsafe self-transfers. An electronic medical record (EMR) Medication administration note dated 12/18/25, at 8:44 p.m. indicated R76 left AMA. Review of R76's progress noted and documents in the EMR on 2/25/26,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to send a copy of the notice of transfer or discharge to the representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman for 1 of 2 residents (R76) reviewed for discharge. R76's entry minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R76 admitted to the facility on [DATE], R76 admitted from a hospital stay. R76's discharge MDS dated [DATE], indicated R76 had an unplanned discharge. R76 had diagnoses that included lumbar vertebra compression fracture, depression, hallucinations, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the December 2025 and January 2026 Ombudsman notifications sent by the facility failed to indicate Ombudsman office was notified R76 had discharged from the facility. Review of R76's electronic medical record (EMR), indicated R76 was not administered evening medications on 12/18/25, due to having discharged against medical advice (AMA). When interviewed on 2/26/26 at 1:00 p.m., social worker (SW)-B stated Ombudsman notifications…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive care plan was individualized and resident-specific for 1 of 1 resident (R19) reviewed for behavioral care planning.Findings include:R19R19's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R19 had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). R19's diagnoses included non-traumatic brain dysfunction (impaired brain function affecting cognition or behavior not caused by physical injury), Alzheimer's disease (a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that causes memory loss, impaired thinking, and decline in functional abilities), heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart is unable to pump blood effectively to meet the body's needs), hypertension (chronically elevated blood pressure), obstructive uropathy (blockage of urine flow that can impair kidney and bladder function), diabetes mellitus (a metabolic disorder characterized by elevated blood glucose…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on others for activities of daily living (ADLs) received the services needed. This affected 1 of 3 residents (R65) observed for partial bathing and nail care and 1 of 3 residents (R47) observed for facial shaving.Findings include: R65 R65's annual MDS dated [DATE], indicated R65 was dependent on staff for personal hygiene, oral cares, bathing and all other ADLs. R65 had severe cognitive impairment. R65's care plan with revision date 2/16/26, indicated R65 required total assistance of one staff for bathing and oral cares, extensive assistance of one staff for dressing and hygiene/grooming tasks. R65's face sheet printed 2/26/26, indicated R65's diagnoses included dementia, anxiety, hypertension, chronic pain insomnia and major depression. During observation on 2/23/26 at 1:52 p.m., R65 had long fingernails with an unknown, dark brown/black substance under the nails. During observation on 2/24/26 at 2:56…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to identify, assess and monitor a new skin concern for 1 of 1 resident (R47) observed for quality of care. Additionally the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice to prevent avoidable harm when assisting a resident with mobility for 1 of 1 resident (R19) observed for wheelchair mobility. Findings include: R47 R47's annual MDS dated [DATE], indicated R47 was dependent on staff for eating, oral hygiene and all other ADLs. R47 had moderate cognitive impairment. R47's physician orders last signed 1/6/26, included, Nurse to complete the Skin Assessment. This order was scheduled weekly on R47's bath day. R47's care plan revision date 1/29/26, failed to instruct staff to observe skin as well as who to report concerns to. No interventions were noted regarding R47's right thumb. R47's face sheet printed 2/26/26 indicated R47's diagnoses included dementia, insomnia, type 2 diabetes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions identified in the comprehensive care plan were implemented to prevent the recurrence of pressure ulcers for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention (R6).Findings include:R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R6 had intact cognition and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs). R6's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy (high blood sugar causing nerve damage) and arthritis (joint inflammation causing pain and stiffness), Review of R6's electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R6 previously had a stage three pressure ulcer (full-thickness skin loss where fat tissue may be visible) on the left heel which was documented as healed as of 1/23/26. The EMR identified R6 remained at risk for skin breakdown and recurrence of a pressure ulcer. Review of R6's comprehensive care plan printed 2/25/26, included interventions to prevent recurrence of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SAINT THERESE SENIOR COMMUNITIES — 4 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN