Cornerstone Villa

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 43 beds and averages 37.5 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.01 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.61 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-01-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who was at risk for elopement. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R1 when she eloped from the facility and was found in the facility parking lot by a passersby. The IJ began on [DATE] at 8:44 p.m., when R1 wandered out of the facility. The administrator and director of nursing (DON) were informed of the IJ on [DATE] at 3:22 p.m. The facility had implemented corrective action on [DATE], prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet dated [DATE], indicated R1 had vascular dementia. R1's care plan dated [DATE], indicated R1 was at risk for elopement, utilized a WanderGuard system (used to trigger alarms to alert staff when the resident is near an exit door). Interventions included monitor WanderGuard placement on walker every shift, and monitor function. Monitor and document any elopement attempts and wandering. R1's Provider…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to dispose of expired food items. The facility also failed to label food items with the open date and expiration date. This had the ability to affect all 35 residents in the facility.Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 12/01/2025 at 1:30 p.m., a Yoplait yogurt container with an expiration date of 11/28/25, was observed in the walk-in refrigerator. There was also a clear plastic container with a green lid containing several hard-boiled eggs in the walk-in refrigerator. The container lacked a label with the items in the container, the date the hard- boiled eggs were prepared, and when the hard-boiled eggs needed to be disposed of. During an interview on 12/01/2025 at 1:44 p.m., culinary aide (CA)-A stated hard boil eggs are made on Saturdays and on Wednesdays. They would be prepared, peeled and then placed into a clear container with the lid. A label needed to be placed on the container with the item name, date prepared, and expiration date. All staff were responsible to make sure food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a resident did not self-administer medications (SAM) as assessed and according to the care plan for 1 of 6 residents (R22) reviewed for medication administration.Findings include: R22's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R22 had diagnoses which included unspecified open-angle glaucoma, severe stage. R22's care plan dated 11/17/25, identified R22 did not wish to self-administer medications. Interventions included nursing was to store, document, and administer all medications and treatments per the physician orders. R22's Order Summary Report identified the following orders:9/4/19, atorvastatin calcium 40 milligrams (mg) by mouth for hyperlipidemia 10/17/25, Eliquis 5 mg by mouth one tablet twice daily for atrial fibrillation 7/21/23, folic acid 1 mg by mouth one time daily10/31/25, furosemide 40 mg by mouth in the morning daily related to heart failure10/31/24, iron 325 mg by mouth one tablet daily in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure post-dialysis access site monitoring was completed and documented to provide continuity of care and reduce the risk of complication (i.e., bleeding, clotting) for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for dialysis care and services.Findings include:R1's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 had a diagnosis of dependence on renal dialysis (a life-sustaining treatment for kidney failure that filters waste and excess fluid from the blood). R1's care plan dated 7/28/25, identified he went to dialysis Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. R1's dressing was to be changed daily with a site check, no blood draws or blood pressures on the right arm with the dialysis graft. In addition, staff were to monitor the site for signs and symptoms of infection and bleeding. (The care plan did not identify which site).R1's Order Summary Report dated 11/25/25, identified staff were to monitor the right arm bruit (a consistent whooshing sound…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure medications including a narcotic were labeled and stored properly in 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: During a medication cart inspection on 12/3/25 at 11:09 a.m., with the director of nursing (DON) a syringe with a pink fluid in it and a paper medication cup with one white pill were both in a plastic drink cup in the cubicle for R24. There were no labels on the syringe, paper cup, or plastic drinking cup. The DON verified this as well. During an interview on 12/3/25 at 11:17 a.m., the DON verified it was not appropriate to find any unlabeled medications in the medication cart. The DON stated she thought the pink liquid was morphine (a potent, opiate analgesic used to treat moderate to severe pain. It is a controlled substance). The DON stated morphine should not be prepared until the medication was ready to be given. In addition, the DON stated the morphine was no longer double locked. The DON verified the cubicle in the drawer was for R24. A review of R24's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-31 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review the facility failed to resolve technical issues timely to ensure staffing data was submitted, for 2 of 4 quarters reviewed (quarter 2 and 3), to the centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) according to specifications established by CMS. Findings Include: Review of the Payroll Based Journal Report (PBJ) [NAME] Report 1705D for quarter 2 2024 (January 1 - March 31) and quarter 3 2024 (April 1st through June 30th), identified no data had been submitted. As a result, the metric for Registered Nurse (RN) hours and licensed nursing coverage was suppressed for those quarters. On 10/30/24 at 11:00 a.m., the human resources director (HR) stated it was her responsibility to gather the staffing data each quarter. She sends the data to the administrator who submits to CMS. HR indicated the facility was made aware of the submission errors in March of 2024 following an internal audit. HR explained the root cause of the submission errors was related their time and labor software program being switched to the cloud. They have been assigned a software…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive water management program to reduce the risk of Legionella (a bacterial infection which can be found within man-made reservoirs) and associated infectious outbreak. These findings had the potential to affect all 38 residents within the facility. In addition, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were implemented in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident (R190) who had a peripherally inserted central line (PICC). Findings include: Water Management: During the recertification survey, from 10/28/24 to 10/31/24, the facility's water management program was requested, and a series of policies were provided which included the following: Water Management Plan dated 2/2021, identified the individuals responsible for the program were the environmental service director (EVS), maintenance assistant and the administrator. The plan identified EVS would be responsible for oversight of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to monitor the temperature for 3 of 3 unit kitchenette refrigerators. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the use of hair restraints during food service. This practice had the potential to affect 37 of the 38 residents at the facility who take in sustenance orally. Findings include: Unit Kitchenette Refrigerators On 10/28/24 at 1:12 p.m., dietary manager (DM) stated the facility has 3 unit kitchenette refrigerators. The refrigerator's store resident snacks, beverages, and personal food. Items commonly stored in the refrigerators include milk, cheese sticks, and yogurt. DM stated the unit kitchenette refrigerators are cleaned daily by kitchen staff, but the temperatures were not monitored or recorded by kitchen or any other staff. Furthermore, the temperatures of the unit kitchenette refrigerators have not been monitored or recorded since he was hired approximately one year ago. DM immediately recognized the lack of temperature monitoring was a food safety issue. During observation on 10/28/24 at 1:20 p.m., DM located an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed for all sections for 1 of 1 residents (R15) reviewed for MDS accuracy. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, dated 10/2019, identified the purpose of the RAI process was to help ensure holistic care was provided. Findings include: R15's admission MDS dated [DATE], identified sections C and D were marked as not assessed. A section of the RAI labeled, SECTION C: COGNITIVE PATTERNS Intent: The items in this section are intended to determine the resident ' s attention, orientation and ability to register and recall new information. These items are crucial factors in many care planning decisions. A section of the RAI labeled, SECTION D: MOOD Intent: The items in this section address mood distress, a serious condition that is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the nursing home and is associated with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to perform nurse assessments, and resident monitoring to ensure timely recognition of clinical decline, provider notification and prompt transfer to a higher level of care occurred for 1 of 1 resident (R29) reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: R29's significant change Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R29 was cognitively intact with the diagnosis of orthostatic hypotension, diabetes, hypopituitarism, and epilepsy. Section N indicated R29 received insulin daily. The report Order Summary, Active Orders as of 9/12/24, listed the following orders: -Blood sugars (BS) 5 times daily update diabetic center with severe hypoglycemia BS less than 60. -Contact MD if BS less than 70 or greater than 400 per protocol in chart under physician orders tab every shift. -Please document any additional low bs noted that need correction with snack -Glucagon kit 1 mg inject 1 mg as needed for low BS per protocol. BS 50-69, 15 G carb (4 glucose…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to provide non- pharmacological interventions prior to administration of an as needed (PRN) antipsychotic medication for 1 of 1 resident (R11) reviewed for PRN psychotropic medication use. Findings include: R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R11 had diagnoses which included dementia and pseudobulbar affect (inappropriate involuntary laughing and crying due to a nervous system disorder). In addition, R11 was severely cognitively impaired with no hallucinations, delusions, behaviors, or rejection of cares. R11's MDS identified she had unclear speech but could usually understand and be understood. R11's care plan dated 11/17/22, identified R11 had as needed lorazepam (a medication used to treat anxiety, a benzodiazepines which are medications that slow down the nervous system) for agitation/anxiety, dyspnea (shortness of breath), and uncontrolled pain. Interventions included to administer lorazepam as ordered and monitor for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$11,243 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $8,420 — penalty dated 2025-01-07
• $2,823 — penalty dated 2023-08-28

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN