No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Crest View Lutheran Home

4444 Reservoir Boulevard Northeast, Columbia Heights, MN 55421 · Non profit - Corporation · 106 certified beds · (763) 782-1611 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse1 immediate-jeopardy citation2 actual-harm citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$16,720 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $16,720 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-19)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4000 Central Ave NE · (855) 324-7843 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walmart1.0 mi
3800 Silver Lake Rd NE · (612) 788-1303 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4301 Benjamin St NE · (612) 460-5156 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4500 Reservoir Blvd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4301 Benjamin St NE · (763) 503-2600

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased26.5%18.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.0%4.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%1.9%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.5%2.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.0%4.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.2%4.0%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened27.8%20.5%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.5%12.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.0%5.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control30.2%24.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.7%17.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.5%1.9%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.2%82.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.2%23.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.3%14.8%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.12U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.04hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.7%CMS range 34.4–62.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 6.1–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge31.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge50.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.711.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.02
RN hours/ resident / day
0.56
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.60
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.19
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.78
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 86.4 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.19 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.02 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.28 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.11 to 0.78 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-26)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-04)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-03-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order was accurately reflected throughout the medical record for 1 of 26 residents (R81) reviewed for advanced directives. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R81 who would have received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), contrary to their wishes, in the absence of a pulse or respirations. The IJ began on [DATE], when the facility obtained a physician's order for R81 to have a full code status even though the physician order for life sustaining treatment (POLST) indicated do not resuscitate (DNR). The IJ was identified on [DATE]. The administrator and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the IJ on [DATE], at 3:15 p.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed on [DATE], but noncompliance remained at the lower scope and severity level of D-isolated scope and severity level, which indicated no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy. Findings include: R81's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-03-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and document review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse. This resulted in actual harm when R2 struck R1 in the face resulting in swelling to the eyebrow, nose fracture, and a laceration to the lip that required hospitalization. The facility had implemented actions on 3/16/26 to prevent recurrence prior to the survey; therefore, the citation was issued at past non-compliance (PNC). Findings include: R1's order summary report dated 3/6/26, identified R1's diagnoses included primary hypertension, traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration and non-Alzheimer's dementia. R1's comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had severe cognitive impairment with no behaviors. R1 required substantial/maximal assistance for toileting, and transfers. R1's activities of daily living (ADLs) care plan dated 3/6/26, indicated R1 was categorically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide care consistent with a resident's needs, and care plan to eliminate/reduce the risk of an accident during a bed bath for 1 of 3 residents (R1). This resulted in actual harm to R1 when staff repositioned her without a drawsheet and with too much force caused R1 to slide out of the bed to the floor. As a result, R1 sustained a fracture to the left femur that required surgical intervention. The facility had implemented actions to prevent reoccurrence prior to the survey on 12/8/25, therefore, the citation was issued at past non-compliance. Findings include: R1's admission record dated 3/20/25, indicated R1's diagnoses included low back pain, chronic congestive heart failure, closed bicondylar fracture of the left femur, generalized weakness, and hospice care. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had intact cognition and was on hospice. R1 required substantial/maximal assistance to roll left to right and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2024-10-30 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide medically related social services of clothing and shoes for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for clothing. This resulted in harm when R2 displayed a lack of engagement in social activities and diminished level of participation in social interactions because she felt unable to leave her room due to a lack of proper and adequate clothing and shoes. Findings include: R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including anxiety disorder, depression, alcohol dependence, and acquired absence of left leg below knee. R1 understood others and was able to make herself understood, had mild cognitive impairment, and utilized a wheelchair and limb prosthesis. The MDS identified, it was somewhat important to R1 to choose what clothes to wear, to do her favorite activities, and to go outside to get fresh air when the weather is good. R1's social isolation score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain the appearance and integrity of the walls in the memory care unit, including the medication room, to provide for a surface which could be cleaned and homelike appearance. The facility failed to maintain furniture which was clean, with intact, washable surfaces in the memory care day room. The facility failed to ensure room blinds were kept in a state of good repair to provide visual privacy in 3 of 4 resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]) observed to have blinds in disrepair. The facility failed to ensure shower rooms were kept in good repair in 3 of 4 shower rooms toured during survey. These concerns had potential to affect any resident who used the three shower rooms. Further, the facility failed to fully investigate missing personal items for 1 of 1 resident (R47) with reports of personal items that was reported missing for approximately nine months.Findings include: During observation on 6/24/25, at 8:44 a.m., in the memory care dayroom, it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to assure medications were properly labeled with the correct dose for 1 of 1 resident, (R20), who received a liquid medication during observation of medication administration. The facility also failed to assure over the counter (OTC) medications were dated when opened in 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed. The facility also failed to consistently date, and/or remove inhalers which were beyond the dates of recommended use, in 1 of 3 medication carts. In addition, the facility failed to remove vaccines which had either an illegible label, or lacked a label, in 2 of 2 medication rooms reviewed. Findings include: Labeling Error: During observation of medication pass on 6/25/25 at 12:17 p.m., trained medication aide, (TMA)-A, was observed as he set up medications for R20. TMA drew Haldol medication up to the 1 (one) mg (milligram) marker on the medication dropper twice. TMA-A stated R20 received 2 (two) mg twice daily, as directed on the medication administration record (MAR), with a dose of 3 (three) mg at bedtime.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for dining, assuring food was offered to residents and assistance was received as needed in a timely manner. This had the potential to affect all 18 residents served in the memory care dining room. Findings include: R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) of 5/8/25, indicated R5 had impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for eating. R9's quarterly MDS of 5/19/25, indicated R9 had impaired cognition, and although R9 required set up for meals, R9 was identified as able to complete eating once set up. R21's annual MDS of 4/30/25, indicated R21 had impaired cognition and required set up for meals. Resident was noted to complete the activity. R25's quarterly MDS of 5/13/25, indicated R25 had impaired cognition and required moderate assist with eating. R36's quarterly MDS of 3/28/25, indicated R36 had impaired cognition and required maximal assistance with eating. R41's annual MDS of 3/21/25, indicated R41 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to appropriately store nutritional supplements in two of two medication rooms reviewed during medication room storage observation. This had the potential to impact all residents who routinely received, or may received nutritional supplements on those units. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine was in good repair. This had the potential to affect residents, staff and visitors who obtained ice from the kitchen. Findings include: On 6/26/25 at 1:56 p.m., an observation was completed with registered nurse (RN)-B in the memory care unit medication room. The following boxes of nutritional supplements were being stored on the floor: An open box of Breeze (a nutritional supplement) with 5 boxes of supplement remaining. One case of 24 boxes of Boost nutritional supplements which were unopened. There were two boxes of Ensure Plus which contained 24 boxes of nutritional supplement when unopened. There was one unopened box, and an additional box of 20 containers. RN-B stated the supplements were placed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was kept clean, sanitary and in good repair which had the potential to affect all residents, staff and visitors who received meals from the kitchen.Findings include:During observation of the kitchen and interview on 6/25/25 at 12:18 p.m., dietary director (DD) noted the floor next to the dishwasher had six tiles with corners missing, the grout between four additional tiles was also missing. On the surface where there had been tile and grout there was a green substance on the subfloor. DD stated, yep, there's missing chunks, missing grout and green stuff. DD then stated, watch this, grabbed dish sprayer, soaked down the floor filled the areas where there as missing tile chunks and grout with water stating, see it doesn't look like that anymore, we mop twice a day so it won't look like that later. DD stated this was a cleaning concern and was potential for bacteria to grow. During observation on 6/26/25 at 7:23 a.m., the floor in dishwashing area continued to have missing tile chunks,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0924 — pattern
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure hand rails were securely attached to the wall. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors who had access to the handrails.Findings include: During observation on 6/25/25 at 5:53 p.m., handrail between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] was loose, the handrail was not attached to the second bracket from room [ROOM NUMBER]. The handrail between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] was loose. The handrail outside of the dining room by the men's restroom was observed to be loose. On 6/26/25 at 2:03 p.m., a tour was completed with the Environmental Service Director (ESD). ESD stated when staff identified areas of concern, there were forms to be filled out and placed into designated boxes. ESD stated the department depended on staff to notify them of needed repairs. ESD stated the maintenance staff were mindful of watching for needed repairs, however, this was a joint effort.On 6/26/25 at 10:42 a.m., reviewed maintenance/housekeeping work order forms from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident rights were maintained for 2 of 4 residents (R15 and R43) reviewed for dignity. Findings Include: R15R15's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R15 had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs). R15's diagnoses included progressive neurological conditions (a disease that causes the nervous system to gradually deteriorate over time), multiple sclerosis (a chronic, often disabling disease that attacks the central nervous system, specially the brain and spinal cord), renal failure (a condition where the kidneys lose their ability to effectively filter waste and excess fluid from the blood), depression, retention of urine, presence of urogenital implants, and hydronephrosis (a condition where one or both kidneys swell due to a backup of urine, often caused by a blockage or obstruction in the urinary tract). MDS also indicated R15 had an indwelling external catheter.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure parameter mattress (a type of mattress cover or encasement designed to create a gentle barrier around the edge of the bed, preventing falls) was not used in a manner to restrain resident while in bed for 1 of 1 resident (R4) reviewed for restraints.Findings include:R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R4 had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs). R4's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (a progressive lung disease that makes it hard to breathe), non-Alzheimer's dementia, hemiplegia (a condition characterized by paralysis on one side of the body), anxiety disorder, depression and insomnia. MDS did not indicate R4 utilized physical restraints. R4's care plan reviewed 6/26/25, identified R4 had a potential alteration in safety and falls related to right hemiplegia, assisted with transfers and psychotropic medication use.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of transfers and discharge for 1 of 3 residents (R43) reviewed for hospitalizations. Findings include:R43's annual MDS dated [DATE], identified R43 had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs). R43's diagnoses included atrial fibrillation (a common type of irregular heartbeat that originates in the heart's upper chambers (atria)), heart failure (a condition where the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), hypertension (high blood pressure), cerebrovascular accident (occurs when blood flow to the brain is interrupted, causing brain cells to die due to lack of oxygen and nutrients), depression, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (a neurodevelopmental condition that affects brain function and behavior, primarily in the areas of attention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity) and aortic aneurysm and dissection (An aortic aneurysm is a bulge or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented to include post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) triggers and interventions for 1 of 1 resident (R47) who had a diagnosis of PTSD.Findings include:R47's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R47 had intact cognition and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs). R47's diagnoses included alcoholic cirrhosis of liver without ascites (severe, irreversible liver disease caused by long-term, excessive alcohol consumption), renal failure (occurs when the kidneys lose their ability to adequately filter waste and excess fluids from the blood), hepatic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction that can occur in people with severe liver disease), and fibromyalgia (chronic disorder characterized by wide-spread musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and cognitive difficulties). During review of R47's electronic health record (EHR), initial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation and document review, the facility failed to update the care plan with specific interventions for 1 of 1 resident (R43) reviewed for respiratory care.Findings include:R43's annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 4/14/25, identified R43 had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL)'s. R43's diagnoses included atrial fibrillation (a common type of irregular heartbeat that originates in the heart's upper chambers (atria)), heart failure (a condition where the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), hypertension (high blood pressure), cerebrovascular accident (occurs when blood flow to the brain is interrupted, causing brain cells to die due to lack of oxygen and nutrients), depression, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (a neurodevelopmental condition that affects brain function and behavior, primarily in the areas of attention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity) and aortic aneurysm and dissection (An aortic aneurysm is a bulge or ballooning of the aortic wall, while an aortic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide supervision, cues, and hands on assistance as needed to eat during meals, and with snacks, for 1 of 1 residents (R5) whom required staff direction for eating. Findings include:R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated R5 had had impaired cognition and required substantial assistance to complete activities of daily living (ADL's) including eating. R5's medical diagnoses included aphasia (a language disorder which impacts the ability to speak), dementia, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).R5's care plan, revised on 5/5/25, identified R5 has potential for alteration in nutrition related to hypertension (high blood pressure), dysphagia, variable intakes and history of refusing meals. The care plan further defined R5 required one-to-one assistance with meals, and cueing/encouragement with foods/snacks/supplements. R5 was identified as having a gradual weight loss and her goal was to maintain current nutritional status as evidenced by stable weight. R5's nutritional care plan directed staff to cue…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to consistently meet the identified needs and preferences of 3 of 4 residents (R7, R19, and R76), reviewed for activities.Findings include: R7R7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) MDS dated [DATE], indicated R7 was alert and oriented. The MDS identified R7's vision was adequate and indicated he was able to see fine detail, including regular print in newspapers/books. The MDS indicated R7 did not require corrective lenses. R7's MDS of 12/1/24, 2/3/24, and 5/4/25 lacked completion of Preferences for Customary Routine and Activities. R7's annual assessment of 11/4/24, identified the following for preferences for Customary Routine and Activities: R7 identified it was very important to listen to music he liked, to complete favorite activities, to go outside to get fresh air when the weather was good, and participate in services or practices; it was somewhat important to keep up the news; it was not very important to do things in groups of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to promote and provide positioning assistance to 1 of 3 (R72), residents reviewed for positioning. Further, the facility failed to implement interventions 1 of 3 residents (R19) reviewed for vision. Findings include: R72's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R72 had impaired cognition and was dependent of staff for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) including mobility and transfer, and was wheelchair bound. R72 had an impairment on one side and was identified as being dependent on staff for assistance with eating. R72's medical diagnoses include dementia, anxiety, psychotic disorder, secondary parkinsonism, and a joint disorder. R72's care plan revised 1/23/25, identified R72 had alteration in mobility related to dementia. The care plan directed staff to turn and reposition, transfer, and boost up in bed with the assist of two staff. R72 used a wheelchair and received assistance of one staff to propel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide assistance to ensure hearing aids/devices were available to maintain hearing/communication needs for 1 of 1 resident (R76) reviewed for hearing. Findings Include: R76's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified R76 had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance with all ADL's. R76's diagnoses included non-traumatic brain dysfunction (brain damage that occurs due to internal factors, rather than external trauma), Alzheimer's disease with late onset, diabetes mellitus (a group of metabolic diseases characterized by high blood sugar levels), anxiety disorder and depression. MDS indicated R76's hearing was moderate difficulty needed hearing aids.R76's care plan, reviewed 6/26/25, identified R76 had an alteration in communication related to hard of hearing and had two hearing aids. The care plan directed staff to ensure glasses and bilateral hearing aides were worn daily, to anticipate needs as needed, allow R76 time to respond,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a thorough smoking assessment was completed for residents who wished to smoke for 1 of 1 resident (R19) reviewed for smoking. Findings include: R19's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R19 had intact cognition and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs). R19's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder, depression, schizophrenia (a chronic mental disorder that disrupts a person's thinking, behavior, and emotions) and nicotine dependence. The MDS lacked documentation R19 was a current tobacco user.R19's care plan reviewed 6/26/25, indicated R19 had elected to be an active smoker and was an independent smoker, had a goal of remaining free from injury associated with smoking and follow the facility smoking policy. The care plan went on to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to properly assess and obtain orders for 1 of 1 resident (R43) reviewed for use of oxygen therapy.Findings include:R43's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R43 had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL)'s. R43's diagnoses included atrial fibrillation (a common type of irregular heartbeat that originates in the heart's upper chambers (atria)), heart failure (a condition where the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), hypertension (high blood pressure), cerebrovascular accident (occurs when blood flow to the brain is interrupted, causing brain cells to die due to lack of oxygen and nutrients), depression, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (a neurodevelopmental condition that affects brain function and behavior, primarily in the areas of attention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity) and aortic aneurysm and dissection (An aortic aneurysm is a bulge or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess past trauma and implement care plan interventions utilizing a trauma-informed approach for 1 of 1 (R47) resident reviewed who had a history of past traumatic experiences. Findings include:R47's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R47 had intact cognition and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs). R47's diagnoses included alcoholic cirrhosis of liver without ascites (severe, irreversible liver disease caused by long-term, excessive alcohol consumption), hypertension (high blood pressure), renal failure (occurs when the kidneys lose their ability to adequately filter waste and excess fluids from the blood), hepatic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction that can occur in people with severe liver disease), and fibromyalgia (chronic disorder characterized by wide-spread musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and cognitive difficulties).R47's care plan print date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to consistently perform hand hygiene with change of gloves while performing blood glucose monitoring. Additionally, the facility failed to clean the community glucose monitor after use. This had the potential to affect any of the 14 residents on the memory care unit who may require blood glucose checks, either routine or emergent. Further, the facility failed to ensure soiled personal laundry and linens were bagged (i.e., contained) at the point-of-use and transported in a manner to reduce the risk of cross-contamination and potential infectious spread in 1 of 1 main washrooms (Evergreen and Willow) and 1 of 1 units (Aspen and [NAME]) reviewed. In addition, the facility failed to properly handle and store clean laundry and linens. This had potential to affect all 78 residents within the care center. Findings include: On 6/24/25 at 3:54 p.m., an observation was completed of medication pass on the memory care unit. During this observation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention. Findings include: Pressure Ulcer Definitions: Pressure Ulcer/Injury: is localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device. A pressure injury will present as intact skin and may be painful. The appearance will vary depending on the stage and may be painful. The injury occurs as a result of intense and/or prolonged pressure or pressure in combination with shear. Unstageable pressure ulcer: Full thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed is obscured by slough or eschar. If the slough or eschar is removed, a stage 3 or 4 pressure ulcer will be revealed. Deep tissue injury: Purple or maroon area of discolored intact skin due to damage of underlying soft tissue. R1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure individualized activities were provided for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for activities. R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE], understood others and made herself understood., had moderate cognitive impairment, sometimes felt socially isolated, and did not exhibit behaviors. R1's Interview for Activity Preferences identified it was somewhat important to her to do her favorite activities, go outside to get fresh air when the weather was good, participate in religious services or practices, and listen to music she liked. R1's LE [Life Enrichment] Initial and Annual Assessment V2 dated 6/3/24, identified R1 had no preference about interaction (one-to-one, small group, large group, or self) and no preference about setting (own room, day room, off-unit, or outside facility). R2's interests were identified as games/cards/puzzles with note cards, some board games,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for one of one resident (R1) reviewed for physician orders. The facility received an order for a cervical collar to be used by two licensed staff; one to stabilize the resident's cervical spine and one for care of the cervical collar and were observed not following the orders. Findings included: During an observation on 7/24/24 at 11:17 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A donned personal protective equipment (PPE) and went into R1's room. Family member (FM)-B was sitting in the room besides R1. LPN-A stated to R1 that she was there to assist R1 in putting his cervical collar on. R1 was seated in his recliner. FM-B stood in front of R1 and grabbed his shoulders while assisting him forward. LPN-A put the foam piece around R1's neck and then placed the hard plastic brace on top of the foam piece. LPN-A tightened the brace by pulling the Velcro straps on each side of his neck. After LPN-A tightened the cervical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to follow the care plan for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse, when R1 was transferred and personal cares were provided by one staff when the care plan directed two female staff for all cares and transfers. Findings include: R1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated she had diagnoses of anxiety, depression, psychotic disorder, and history of falls. The MDS also indicated R1 had moderate cognitive impairment, and was dependent on staff for transfers. R1's care plan dated 5/21/24 directed two female staff only present during cares and two staff to assist with transfers. The care plan noted a history of past trauma. R1's fall risk assessment dated [DATE] indicated R1 had a high fall risk. Her fall risk assessment indicated she had a balance problem while walking. R1's progress note dated 2/15/24 indicated R1 had a fall on 2/15/24. R1's progress note dated 5/15/24 indicated she alleged a staff member had sexually…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was labeled, dated, and stored to prevent foodborne illness. The facility failed to maintain clean vents over clean dishes. In addition, the facility failed to ensure dishware was cleaned and sanitized in a manner to reduce the risk of foodborne illness. This had potential to affect all residents and staff who eat from the main kitchen. Findings include: During observation and interview on 4/1/24 at 11:58 a.m., cook and chef supervisor (cook) stated he was cleaning out the refrigerator after the weekend. The refrigerator contained undated items which included a sandwich, Styrofoam container of soup, opened container of a cucumber salad, and bag of lettuce. Director of dining services (CD) confirmed the items were undated and from over the weekend. CD removed other undated items from the refrigerator described as chicken and pork from meals over the weekend. CD stated they keep leftovers for three days, and the lettuce was opened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement transmission-based precautions (TBP) for 1 of 1 resident (R17) reviewed who had emesis and loose stools while there was an outbreak of confirmed rotavirus and norovirus cases (contagious viruses which causes vomiting and diarrhea and are spread through feces) in the facility, failed to implement TBP for 1 of 1 residents (R65) who had a history of MRSA (methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus - a potentially dangerous type of staph bacteria that is resistant to certain antibiotics), and failed to implement enhanced-barrier precautions for 2 of 2 residents (R385, R53) and failed to ensure proper handling of linens observed for infection prevention practices. Findings include: During observation on 4/1/24 at 11:45 a.m., bright pink signs were observed on the front doors to the building which identified the facility had an outbreak of norovirus, rotavirus, and Covid-19. Additional signs were posted on hallway doors throughout…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide the resident with a written discharge notice and basis for discharge; and failed notify the Ombudsman Office for Long-Term Care (OOLTC) of transfers and discharges for 1 of 1 resident (R82) reviewed for facility initiated discharge, which has the potential to affect all residents who transfer or discharge. Findings include: R82's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition, no behaviors or rejection of care and discharge planning was in place to move to another facility. R82 required supervision with bed mobility, transfers and toileting; and was independent with eating after set up. R82's admission Record dated 4/4/24, identified an admission date of 3/1/24, and a discharge date of 3/8/24. R82's diagnoses included chronic kidney disease and urinary tract infection. R82's medical record dated 3/1/24 through 3/8/24, lacked a discharge notice with the basis for discharge, statement of appeal rights, and OOLTC…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a self administration of medications (SAM) assessment was completed to allow residents to safely administer their own medications for 1 of 1 (R19) resident observed with medications at bedside. Findings include: R19's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition and diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), and chronic kidney disease (CKD). It further indicated R19 received oxygen therapy. R19's physician's orders dated 12/1/23, indicated oxygen 2.5 liters per minute (lpm) per nasal cannula, continuous. It further lacked an order for R19 to self administer medications. R19's SAM assessment dated [DATE], indicated R19 didn't want to administer her own medications and required assistance taking them. R19's care plan dated 2/13/24, indicated R19 received oxygen therapy (per nasal cannula) related to CHF, to keep oxgyen (02) saturations greater than or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was accessible for 1 of 1 resident (R385) reviewed for call light accessibility. Findings include: R385's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], included R385 was moderately cognitively impaired, had diagnoses of malnutrition and depression, was dependent on staff to turn in bed, always continent of bowel and occasionally incontinent of urine, was at risk for pressure ulcers, and had a history of falls. R385's care plan dated 3/8/24, included R385 had an alteration in safety related to falls and included interventions of keep call light within reach, remind resident when/how to use it, and remind to ask for assistance. In addition, the care plan directed staff to not wake R385 up at night per their request, and R385 will use their call light if they need any assistance. During observation on 4/1/24 at 5:53 p.m., R385 was lying supine and asleep wearing a gown in their bed with their feet flat against the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to include a physician documented basis for discharge for 1 of 1 resident (R82) reviewed for facility initiated discharge. Findings include: R82's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition, no behaviors or rejection of care and discharge planning was in place to move to another facility. R82 required supervision with bed mobility, transfers and toileting; and was independent with eating after set up. R82's admission Record dated 4/4/24, identified an admission date of 3/1/24, and a discharge date of 3/8/24. R82's diagnoses included chronic kidney disease and urinary tract infection. R82's Care Plan dated 3/1/24, identified R82 wanted to discharge to an assisted living facility or independent senior living facility with home care services, and the potential for discharge would be reviewed in 30 days. R82's physical (PT) and occupational (OT) therapy notes dated 3/1/24 through 3/8/24, identified the plan was to continue…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to complete a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment to ensure cognitive and mood needs were evaluated and addressed for 1 of 1 resident (R334) reviewed for comprehensive MDS assessment accuracy. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual version 1.18.11, dated October 2023, indicated the purpose of the manual was to offer clear guidance about how to use the resident assessment instrument (RAI) correctly and effectively to provide appropriate care. The RAI helps nursing home staff gather definitive information on a resident's strengths and needs, which must be addressed in an individualized care plan. A comprehensive MDS assessment includes completion of both the MDS and the CAA (care area assessment) process, as well as care planning. Comprehensive assessments are completed upon admission, annually, and when a significant change in a resident's status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure physical devices were assessed and reassessed for continued appropriateness for 1 of 1 resident (R66) who had perimeter mattresses placed on their bed as a fall intervention. Findings include: R66's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified she was rarely/never understood, with verbal behaviors toward others one to three days in the lookback period which posed no significant risk or interfered with cares. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease and resident was on hospice. Extensive assist of two staff was required with transfers and bed mobility, and no falls occurred since the prior MDS assessment. R66's Care Area assessment dated [DATE], identified she was a fall risk related to weakness, Alzheimer's disease, history of falls and poor safety awareness. R66's Care Plan intervention dated 10/20/23, identified a perimeter mattress was placed due to a potential alteration in safety, falls related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's preferred activities were available for 1 of 1 resident (R36) reviewed for activities. Findings include: R36's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R36 had a memory problem, did not have behaviors, did not reject care, was very important to choose her own bedtime, listen to music R36 liked, very important to participate in religious services or practices, and was very important to do her favorite activities. Additionally, the MDS indicated a diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, and psychotic disorder other than schizophrenia. R36's State Optional quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R36 required extensive assist with bed mobility, transfers, eating, and toileting. R36's care plan dated 1/17/24, indicated R36 had an alteration in bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, grooming due to dementia and immobility and interventions included to offer country music while attempting to complete care or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-02 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the quality assessment and assurance (QAA)/Quality Assurance Process improvement (QAPI) committee was effective in identifying and implementing appropriate action plans to correct quality deficiencies identified during previous surveys related to infection control, respiratory therapy and advanced directives resulting in deficiencies identified during this survey. In addition, the facility failed to review and/or revise policies affecting resident care periodically to ensure the policy/practice was still appropriate. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 95 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: The Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (CASPER)-3 (assessment data was converted to quality measures (QM) to evaluate nursing home's performance) dated 2/16/23, identified the following prior deficiencies by month and year: -F578-Request/Refuse/Discontinue treatment; Formulate advance directives was cited on prior surveys 10/7/21, 11/19 and 3/18. All were cited at a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident ice packs were stored separately from resident food in 2 of 4 nursing unit resident refrigerators. This had the potential to impact 73 residents residing on those units. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure current standards of practice for glove use and handwashing were being followed for 1 of 1 resident (R31), when staff provided personal care. Findings include: Ice pack storage for resident use An observation on 2/27/23, at 3:03 p.m. the unit-A resident refrigerator sign indicated refrigerator storage was only for items intended for human consumption. Inside the refrigerator's freezer several blue gel ice packs were noted along with smaller white reusable shipping ice packs. An observation on 2/27/23, at 7:02 p.m. unit B and C's resident refrigerator sign indicated refrigerator storage was only for items intended for human consumption. Inside the refrigerator's freezer two blue gel ice packs were noted along with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (CMS-10055) was provided to 2 of 3 residents (R91, R94) who continued to reside in the facility upon termination of Medicare A benefits. Findings include: The Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (CMS-10055) informs resident/beneficiaries of potential liability for payment and related standard claim appeal rights. R91's census report printed 3/2/23, indicated 91's Medicare A benefit ended on 2/23/23. R91's census report further indicated R91 continued to reside in the facility. R91's CMS-10055 was requested however was not provided. R94's census report printed 3/2/23, indicated R94's Medicare A benefit ended on 2/7/23. R94's census report further indicated R94 continued to reside in the facility. R94's CMS-10055 was requested however was not provided. When interviewed on 3/2/23, at 1:23 p.m. the administrator verified a CMS-10055 was not completed for R91 and R94. The administrator further stated the CMS-10055 was not used at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain a walking program for 1 of 1 resident (R25) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) decline. Findings include: R25's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R25 had minimal cognitive impairment and required extensive one-person physical assistance with most ADLs. Walk in room and walk in corridor assessment indicated the activity did not occur. R25 used a wheelchair for mobility. R25's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness or paralysis affecting one side of the body), diabetes, and peripheral vascular disease (condition affecting blood circulation). R25's annual MDS dated [DATE], indicated R25 required one-person physical assist to walk in room and that R25 used a walker and wheelchair for mobility. R25's ADL care plan dated 12/15/22, indicated R25 had an ADL self-care deficit with a goal to maintain current level of function. Interventions included, Ambulate 1 time a day, 7 days a week…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure residents were appropriately assessed post dialysis treatments and resident's health status communicated between dialysis center and facility for 1 of 1 resident (R90) reviewed for dialysis. Findings include: R90's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R90 was cognitively intact, received dialysis treatment, and had diagnoses including end stage renal disease (advanced state with loss of function), diabetes, syncope (feeling lightheaded) and collapse. R90's care plan dated 2/2/23, indicated R90 received dialysis related to renal failure and instructed staff to monitor, document and report signs of infection at the access site, bleeding, changes in level of consciousness and changes in heart and lung sounds. R90's care plan instructed staff to obtain vital signs (VS) and weight per protocol and report significant changes in pulse, respirations, and blood pressure immediately. R90's physician orders indicated R90…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure ongoing assessments for safety and appropriate use of grab bars were completed for 1 of 1 resident (R11) who was observed to have grab bars affixed to their bed. Findings include: R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R11 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of chronic pain and heart failure. Furthermore, R11's MDS indicated R11 did not use bed rails. R11's medical record lacked indication R11 was assessed for grab bar use since 11/2021. R11's care plan revised 1/20/19, indicated R11 had an alteration in activities of daily living (ADL) related to decreased mobility and utilized two grab bars for independent bed mobility and repositioning. During an observation on 2/27/23, at 12:49 p.m. R11 was laying in bed. R11's bed had bilateral grab bars. When interviewed on 2/27/23, at 12:49 p.m. R11 stated the grab bars helped him with getting out of bed and was not aware of any safety assessment related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and document review, the facility failed to ensure accurate administration of initial COVID-19 vaccination series for 1 of 5 residents (R56) reviewed for COVID-19 vaccinations who received an incorrect initial COVID-19 vaccine. Findings include: R56's immunization record in point click care (PCC) lacked documentation of R56 receiving an initial primary series of COVID-19 vaccinations. R56's medication administration record (MAR) dated December 2022, indicated R56 received the Pfizer bivalent booster vaccine in the right arm with no immediate adverse reactions noted. R56's progress note dated 12/16/22, indicated R56 received Pfizer bivalent booster with no immediate adverse reactions and lacked documentation the physician was notified of the medication error. R56's progress notes were reviewed from 12/16/22, through 3/2/23, and lacked documentation the physician was notified of the medication error and lacked documentation on any follow-up from the medication error. During interview on 3/2/23, at 4:13 p.m. licensed practical nurse (LPN)-B stated R56…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to monitor side effects for 1 of 3 (R43) residents reviewed for anticoagulation (blood thinner) therapy. Findings include: R43's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R43 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of heart disease and pulmonary embolism (blood clot in lung). Furthermore, R43's MDS indicated R43 received anticoagulation therapy. R43's provider order summary printed 3/2/23, indicated R43 required Rivaroxaban (anticoagulation medication) 20 milligrams(mg) tablet daily to prevent blood clots. R43's weekly skin assessment dated [DATE], indicated no skin concerns. R43's care plan dated 1/27/23, indicated R43 had alterations to skin related to decreased mobility, edema, history of pressure ulcer and aspirin use and directed staff to monitor R43's skin with cares. R3's R43's care plan further indicated R43 had fragile skin on hands however refused Geri sleeve protection. R43's medical record lacked evidence R43 required monitoring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to assess appropriateness of antibiotic use was completed for 1 of 1 residents (R60) who was prescribed oral antibiotics for a skin infection. Findings include: R60's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R60 had moderate cognitive impairment and diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). R60's provider order dated 2/24/23, indicated R60 required Doxycycline (antibiotic) tablet 100 milligrams(mg) by mouth twice daily for cyst/cellulitis (skin infection) for 10 days. R60's provider order dated 2/27/23, indicated R60 required a 72-hour time out assessment on the evening of 2/27/23. R60's medical record lacked evidence a 72-hour antibiotic time out assessment was completed. When interviewed on 3/1/23, at 10:51 a.m. licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A verified R60 was on Doxycycline for a cyst on his buttock. LPN-A stated when residents were placed on antibiotics, nurses were required to complete a 72-hour assessment to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-06-26 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure results of complaint investigations were available for review. This had the potential to affect all 78 residents residing in the facility, as well as family, visitors, and staff.Findings include:During observation on 6/23/25 at 11:32 a.m., the facility survey results were in a three ring binder labeled Annual Survey Results. The survey results posted included the recertification survey results from the past three recertification surveys however, lacked the 2567's (reports completed by surveyors regarding findings of investigations and the responses by the facility) regarding complaint investigations.A review of Aspen Central Office (ACO-an online computerized federal document site which contains the surveys completed for facilities, including both recertification surveys, and complaint investigation) indicated complaint investigations were completed without citations on the following date following the recertification survey of 4/4/24: 3/6/24. Additionally, complaint investigations were completed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-06-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to develop a policy, without conflicting information, consistent with federal requirement for reporting allegations of abuse to the state agency immediately but no later than two (2) hours. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Finding includes:Review of the facility's Resident Protection Plan policy with a revised date of 2/2023, indicated it is the policy of the facility that reports of mistreatment, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of property are promptly and thoroughly investigated. Allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property are reported immediately. If the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury the report must be made immediately, and no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made. If the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse or do not result in serious bodily injury the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$16,720 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $16,720 — penalty dated 2026-03-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
AHRENDT, ANDREWIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/19/2018
LANDREVILLE, MARKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/12/2024
MOE, SHERILYNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2022
TESKE, GLENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/01/2022
ANDERSON, GABRIELLEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/07/2025
MILLER, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/01/2022
OLSON, WAYNEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/01/2024
FOX, TERESEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/07/2025
GREENBERG, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2026
JOHNSON, CHRISIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/06/2025
MELTON, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/07/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$772K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 2%Other / private 25%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $772K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$352per resident / day
operating cost
$10,696per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$322per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Minnesota
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,870/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,573/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245018. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next