Woodlake Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 378 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 125 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 188 beds and averages 168.5 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.28 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.39 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.70 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman of transfers and discharge for 1 of 4 residents (R17) reviewed for hospitalizations. Findings include:R17's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R17 was cognitively intact. R17 MDS indicated diagnosis of cancer, heart failure, renal insufficiency, and diabetes mellitus. R17's medical record identified the following MDS assessments:1) 7/8/25 discharge with return anticipated, with 7/17/25 entry record2) 8/1/25 discharge with return anticipated, with 8/4/25 entry record3) 8/17/25 discharge with return anticipated, with 8/25/25 entry record4) 9/29/25 discharge with return anticipated, with 10/5/25 entry record5) 10/23/25 discharge with return anticipated, with 10/29/25 entry recordA review of the facility information sent to the Ombudsman dated July 2025 through November 2025, lacked evidence of R17's name being included on the list of hospitalized residents. An interview on 12/18/25 at 11:24 a.m., director of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure timely follow up for recommendations from in-house provider for 1 of 1 (R161) resident reviewed for eye drops.Findings include: R161's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], included R161 was cognitively intact. R161 had diagnoses of arthritis, anxiety and depression. During interview on 12/15/25 at 4:53 p.m., R161 stated she had an eye doctor appointment about a week ago had not received the eye drops that had been ordered. R161's HealthDrive Eye Care Group after visit summary (AVS) dated 12/2/25, included R161 reported itchy eyes. Under the AVS section plan, the following was listed:- Discontinue Medication Order(s) effective 12/02/2025: Artificial tears ophthalmic Solution (eye drops to treat dry eyes)- New Medication Order: olopatadine (eye drop for dry, itchy eyes) 0.2%, apply 1 drop, Both eyes, every morning for 90 days R161's order summary sheet dated 12/18/25, included artificial Tears Ophthalmic Solution 1.4 % (Polyvinyl…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure all medications and biologicals were locked in compartments which only allowed authorized personnel to have access. This had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors.Findings include:During constant observation on 12/16/25 from 1:27 p.m. through 1:40 p.m., an insulin pen was observed laying on top of a locked treatment cart. The treatment cart was passed by a resident and multiple staff; none noted the insulin pen or interacted with it.On 12/16/25 at 1:40 p.m., the licensed practical nurse (LPN)-B was stopped at the cart and stated they had no idea where the pen was from or how it got there. LPN-B stated they were expected to keep the insulin pens in the medications cart, went to their cart, and pulled out a currently opened pen for the same resident. LPN-B then stated they would report the incident to their nursing supervisor and remove the pen from circulation.On 12/16/25 at 1:55 p.m., the registered nurse manager (RN)-A stated they had recently changed their processes, and the staff nurses were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to maintain an environment that was clean and free from odors for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for environmental concerns. Findings include:During observation of the two-east unit on 9/11/25 at 10:50 a.m., a musty odor was observed outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. During observation on the east unit on 9/12/25 at 8:23 a.m., the hallway outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] smelled of urine. No trash or linen carts were in the vicinity.R1's admission Record indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included Surgery of digestive system, chronic pain, and weakness. During interview on 9/11/25 at 10:39 a.m., family member (FM)-A stated it smelled like death in his dad bathroom when he was at the facility even after they had cleaned it. R2's admission Record indicated she admitted to the facility 9/3/25 and resided on the two- east unit of the facility. Diagnosis included muscle weakness, DMII, hypertension and history of falls.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences upon admission to the facility for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R3) reviewed who reported concerns related to accommodation of needs upon admission to the facility.Findings include: R3's admission Record indicated admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 12:45 p.m. Diagnosis included fractures of left fibula and tibia (the two bones of the lower leg), pain in left wrist and left leg, fracture of left radius (one of two bones in your forearm), unsteadiness and dependence on other enabling machines and devices.R3's Interagency Transfer Orders dated 9/4/25, included oxyCodone 5 milligrams (mg). Give 5-10 mg every four hours as needed for pain. The orders indicated R3 had restricted weight bearing and indicated non-weight bearing on left leg and left arm, okayed for a platform walker at the left elbow.R3's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 9/1/25 through 9/30/25, indicated the following…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure assistance, to resident triggered call light needs, was provided timely to promote dignity and reduce the risk of potential complications (i.e., incontinence, skin impairments, falls, changes in condition, etc.) for 8 of 8 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8) who expressed concerns related to extended call light response times and associated potential risk factors to their health.R8:R8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R8 lacked communication impairments and required some form of physical assist with most of his ADLs and mobility. R8 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, at risk for pressure ulcers, and was diagnosed with diabetes, Parkinson's disease, and muscle weakness. R8's medical record identified his most recent brief interview for mental status (BIMS) was 15 (cognitively intact). R8's admission Record, printed [DATE], identified he desired CPR if his heart were to stop beating. R8's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to immediately, but no later than two hours, report to the state agency an allegation of abuse for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for employee to resident sexual abuse. Findings include: During an observation on 11/26/24 at 10:15 a.m. R1 was in his room calling out to nurse manager (NM)-A who was walking past R1's room. R1 was heard saying they said not to take the abuse allegations lightly, so I called 911 again and they told me to call the sergeant. NM-A asked R1 if the police officer came to talk to him and R1 stated no. R1 stated he wanted that woman arrested for abuse. NM-A stated, it was not abuse. R1 stated it was sexual abuse. NM-A stated to R1 it was not sexual abuse and walked out of R1's room. R1's Facesheet indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of gas gangrene. R1's additional diagnoses included pathological fracture on right radius, malignant neoplasm of prostate, paranoid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide and maintain dignity for 1 of 1 residents (R106) reviewed for dignity. Findings Include: R106's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated a severely impaired cognition, diagnosis of dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities) and required extensive assistance for dressing, grooming and toileting. R106's care plan dated 7/21/24, indicated R106 required extensive assist of 1 staff for dressing and grooming. The care plan did not indicate if R106 preferred to wear her own clothes or a hospital type gown. On 10/22/24 at 3:26 p.m., R106 was in her room, sitting in her wheelchair wearing a white with blue flowers hospital type gown. R106 did not have on any type of footwear. R106's hair was uncombed and had areas that appeared to be matted and other areas that stood up approximately 2 inches from her scalp. During observation and interview on 10/22/24 at 3:31 p.m. certified nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were comprehensively assessed for self-administration of medications for 1 of 1 resident (R423) reviewed. Findings include: R423's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R423's cognition as moderately impaired and needed assistance with of one staff with activities of daily living (ADL's). During an observation on 10/24/24 at 7:45 a.m., R423 was laying in her bed with lights on. R423 had a tube of Asper Crème (treats muscle and joint pain), a container of petroleum jelly, and two bottles of Nystatin powder in the yellow bin next to the nightstand and unsecured. R423 stated the nursing assistant (NA) put that on for me. During medical record review on 10/24/24, the medical record lacked evidence of an assessment for self-administering medications (SAM) being completed. The medical record lacked evidence of a physician order for a SAM. During an interview on 10/24/24 at 9:33 a.m., NA-A stated R423 requested…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assistance with dressing and grooming for 1 of 3 residents (R106) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care provided for dependent residents. Finding include: R106's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated severely impaired cognition, diagnosis of dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities) and required extensive assistance for dressing, grooming, bathing, oral cares and toileting. The MDS indicated R106 did not reject or refuse cares. R106's care plan dated 7/21/24, indicated R106 had an ADL deficit related to dementia and required extensive assist of 1 staff for dressing, grooming, bathing, and elimination. The care plan indicated R106 would receive the necessary assistance with all ADL's. The care plan also indicated R106 did not have any natural teeth and instructed staff to assist with denture placement every AM and removal every PM. The care plan instructed staff to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 48 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

18 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN