Fairview Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 63 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 79.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 43.0 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-02-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to comprehensively assess pressure ulcer (PU) development, implement appropriate interventions to prevent PU's and notify the provider of changes for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who entered the facility without pressure ulcers. This resulted in harm when R1 devleoped a stage 3 pressure ulcer. The facility implemented immediate corrective action, so the deficient practice was issued at past non-compliance. Findings include Definitions: Blister-a bubble of fluid under the skin. A pressure ulcer can develop into blisters and open sores, which can then become infected and grow deeper until they reach muscle, bone or joints. Stage 3 pressure ulcer is characterized by full thickness skin loss and may be deep. They affect the top two layers of skin and fatty tissue. Unstageable pressure ulcers develop from long-lasting pressure on the skin and means the full depth of the ulcer cannot be measured with slough or eschar obstructing the wound bed. R1's face sheet dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0551 — isolated
  Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide proper updates and notification to a resident representative for 1 of 1 residents (R51) reviewed for representative notification. Findings include:R51's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/13/25, included R51 was cognitively intact with diagnoses of stroke, hypertension (high blood pressure), depression. R51's consent form dated 6/13/25, listed family member (FM)-B as the first emergency contact and guarantor and FM-A as second emergency contact. Consent form was signed by FM-B. R51's statutory short form power of attorney (POA) document dated 5/16/01, was uploaded to R51's medical record on 6/26/25 at 11:24 a.m. Power of attorney document included FM-A as attorney-in-fact. FM-B was included under successor attorney-in-fact. POA document included a check next to a line of text which read Each attorney-in-fact may independently exercise the powers granted. Only one name, FM-A, was listed under the heading attorney(s)-in-fact. FM-B was listed under successor attorney(s)-in-fact with the statement…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a medication was administered safely for 1 of 1 resident (R42) who had been assessed as unable to safely self-administer medications.Findings include:The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R42's had severe cognitive impairment, required set-up assistance for upper body dressing, partial/moderate assistance for lower body dressing, substantial/maximal assistance with taking on/off footwear, and set-up assistance for eating.R42's medical diagnosis included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (lung and airway disease that restricts your breathing), chronic diastolic heart failure (CHF) (causes shortness of breath and fatigue).R42's orders included Ipratropium-Albuterol inhalation three times per day in the morning, afternoon, and evening; does not self-administer nebulizer.During observation and interview on 1/13/26 at 8:32 a.m., R42 stated staff hadn't returned to take her nebulizer mask off so…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for 1 of 1 resident (R42) reviewed for respiratory cares.Findings include: The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R42's had severe cognitive impairment. Further, R42 required set-up assistance for upper body dressing, partial/moderate assistance for lower body dressing, substantial/maximal assistance with taking on/off footwear, and set-up assistance for eating.R42's medical diagnosis included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) lung and airway disease that restricts your breathing), chronic diastolic heart failure (CHF) causes shortness of breath and fatigue).R42's care plan failed to include a respiratory care plan. Further, the comprehensive care plan lacked the resident preference to have staff remove the nebulizer mask.R42's orders included Ipratropium-Albuterol inhalation three times per day in the morning, afternoon, and evening; does not self-administer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were performed for 2 of 2 residents (R45, R9) who had their blood sugar checks completed with the same glucometer (machine used to check blood glucose).Findings include:R9's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R9 was diabetic.R9's medication administration record indicated R9's blood sugar was checked four times a day.R45's admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated R45 was diabetic.R45's medication administration record indicated R45's blood sugar was checked four times a day: before meals and at bedtime.During observation and interview on 1/13/26 at 4:04 p.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A took a canvas case containing glucometer from the top of the medication cart and entered R45's room. LPN-A opened the case and placed it on R45's bedside table. LPN-A checked R45's blood sugar, placed the glucometer in the case, and left the room, and placed the case in the top…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0659 — isolated
  Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure unqualified staff did not perform ear cleaning for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for cares provided by unqualified staff.Findings include: R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE], and took an antiplatelet medication (medication to prevent platelets from forming blood clots). R1 had an adequate ability to hear, used a hearing aid or other hearing appliance, had moderately impaired cognition, and required moderate staff assistance with personal hygiene. R1's facesheet dated 7/30/25, indicated he had diagnoses which included weakness, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, and weakness. R1's care plan for activities of daily living (ADL's) dated 5/2/25, identified he needed assistance with activities of daily living (ADL)'s. Interventions included: showers with assist of one staff, allow to complete as much as able, resident prefers a shower twice a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure insulin pens were appropriately labeled according to manufacturer's guidelines with an opened date for 1 of 1 observed medication cart for 1 of 1 resident (R28) who required the use of an insulin pen. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure tuberculin solution was dated when opened. In addition, failed to ensure expired product was not available for administration for 1 of 1 medication room reviewed for medication storage. This had the potential to affect anyone who would be prescribed this medication. Findings include: During an observation on 1/14/25 licensed practical nurse (LPN)-B removed an insulin pen from the 100 hall cart for R28 and continued to prepare. LPN-B indicated they need to have all insulin verified by a second nurse. While waiting for another nurse, surveyor observed the insulin nearly emptied and found to not have an opened date on the pen. LPN-B said it should be on the plastic cover but was unable to find said cover. LPN-B removed the insulin pen from writers' hand, removed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to assess residents for their ability to self-administer nebulizer treatments after nurse set up for 1 of 1 resident (R31) observed self-administrating a nebulizer treatment. Findings include: R31's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R31 was mildly cognitively impaired with a diagnosis of dementia, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma. R31's orders included Ipratropium-Albuterol Inhalation Solution 0.5-2.5 (3) MG (milligrams)/3ML (milliliters), three times a day related to COPD. R31's care plan included, resident needs assist with ADL's (activities of daily living), is at risk for falls and to keep environment free of clutter, and resident is alert and oriented, due to forgetfulness, staff to anticipate resident needs. While observing medication administration on 1/14/25 at 10:11 a.m. registered nurse (RN)-A had their medication cart in the main entrance area to the left of the 200-hall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0811 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are assessed for appropriateness for a feeding assistant program, receive services as per their plan of care, and feeding assistants are trained and supervised.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents with difficulty swallowing were assisted with meals by qualified individuals. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 1/13/25 at 5:22 p.m., Activity aide (A)-A was feeding R3 spoon full of food and handing him bites of a sandwich. A-A said she just finished the Paid Feeding Assistant Training. A-A indicated R3 is supposed to be on a pureed diet, but family wants him to have a mechanical soft diet. A-A said R3 aspirates a lot, we give him small drinks and must be assisted by staff. If he feeds himself, he will cough most of the night. R3's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R3 had cognitive impairment, lower extremity impairment of one side of the body. R3's diagnoses included stroke, dysphagia (condition affecting ability to swallow), and left-sided hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body). R3's Medication/Treatment Administration/Order Summary Record reads,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to revise the plan of care after changes to fall prevention measure for 1 of 4 residents (R3) reviewed for accidents. Findings include: R3's Face sheet dated 12/31/24, identified diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease and repeated falls. R3's fall incident report dated 12/6/24, identified R3 had an unwitnessed fall at 7:00 a.m., R3 was found on the floor, leaning against the bed. Injuries of abrasion to right knee, bruise to right lower leg and left forearm. R3's progress notes dated 12/9/24, 12/10/24, 12/11/24, and 12/12/24, identified interdisciplinary team reviewed fall from 12/6/24 and determined to get R3 up if she is restless or trying to kick her legs out of bed. R3's care plan was not updated with this intervention until 12/30/24. R3's mobility focus care plan dated 12/30/24, identified R3 had a history of falls. R3's care plan identified an intervention: If resident is restless while in bed, and/or trying to kick her legs out of bed, she is to get up into her chair and brought out into hallway or dayroom,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to assess and monitor non-pressure related skin injuries (bruises) for changes until resolved for 1 of 3 residents (R1, R2 and R3), reviewed for injury of unknown origin. Findings include: R1's progress note dated 10/30/24 at 8:05 a.m., included R1 had whirlpool this morning. Continue to monitor skin. Various areas of bruising in stages of healing .Skin intact. R1's record did not include an assessment that identified skin integrity of and around the bruise location and size of the bruising and any associated pain. R1's admission, Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R1's cognition was moderately impaired. R1's care plan dated 11/5/24, identified a focus of potential for pressure ulcer development related to impaired mobility, impaired cognition, occasional incontinence, variable intake, and left arm sling use. Interventions included to follow the facility policies for prevention and treatment of skin breakdown. R1's Incident Of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $50K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN