Lakeview Methodist Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 114 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 74.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 67.1 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.77 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.15 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.04 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.95 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-11-19 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to ensure grievance forms were posted in prominent locations throughout the facility for residents and resident representatives to file grievances, and anonymously. This had the potential to affect all 66 residents in the facility. Findings include:On 11/18/25 at 10:30 a.m., during the resident council meeting, residents R7, R25, R26, R42, R43, and R62 stated they were not aware of any method to submit concerns anonymously. The residents also reported that grievance forms were not readily available and could only be obtained by asking staff. R25 further stated grievance forms had previously been available in multiple locations throughout the facility but were no longer accessible to residents without requesting them from staff.On 11/18/25 at 12:12 p.m., during a facility tour, social services (SS)-A confirmed there were no grievance forms in the designated areas accessible to all residents, which were expected at the end of each wing on first and second floor. SS-A stated grievance forms had previously been available at the end…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was implemented to ensure activity preferences were identified and implemented for 1 of 2 residents (R31) reviewed for activities.R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 was admitted to the facility 10/16/25, had moderately impaired cognition, required partial to moderate assistance with transfers, and substantial/maximal assistance with shower/bathe and dressing, and required supervision with eating and oral hygiene. R1 identified it was somewhat important to do her favorite activities, keep up with the news, participate in religious services, go outside to get fresh air, have reading material, listen to music, and do things with groups of people. R1's diagnoses included anemia, heart failure pneumonia, macular degeneration (chronic eye condition that affects retina leading to significant visual impairment) and depression. R1's baseline/comprehensive care plan dated 11/3/25, did not include…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure individualized activities were care planned and provided for 1 of 2 residents (R1) reviewed for activities. Findings include: R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R1 was admitted to the facility 10/16/25, had moderately impaired cognition, required partial to moderate assistance with transfers, and substantial/maximal assistance with shower/bathe and dressing, and required supervision with eating and oral hygiene. R1 identified it was somewhat important to do her favorite activities, keep up with the news, participate in religious services, go outside to get fresh air, have reading material, listen to music, and do things with groups of people. R1's diagnoses included anemia, heart failure pneumonia, macular degeneration (chronic eye condition that affects retina leading to significant visual impairment) and depression. R1's baseline/comprehensive care plan dated 11/3/25, did not include R4's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide routine passive range of motion (PROM) on a consistent basis to improve strength, mobility and improve circulation for 1 of 1 resident (R32) reviewed for ROM. In addition, the facility failed to identify and develop interventions to reduce the risk of potential complications of a hand contracture.Findings include:R32's facesheet printed on 11/19/25, included diagnoses of traumatic brain injury, Parkinson's disease, and dementia.R32's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated severe cognitive impairment, no speech, rarely/never understood, sometimes responded to simple, direct communication only. Dependent upon staff for all activities of living (ADL). R32's physician orders dated 4/13/21, indicated restorative nursing measures such as PROM, ambulation, transfers, ADL may be implemented following an assessment by a licensed nurse.R32's care plan, undated and printed on 11/19/25, indicated R32 had an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure basic infection control practices were followed when the tubing of a urinary drainage bag for 1 of 1 resident (R8), was observed laying on the floor of the shower. The deficient practice had the potential to cause infection.Findings include:R8's face sheet printed on 11/19/25, included diagnoses of stroke, obstructive and reflux uropathy (blockage that prevents urine from flowing, causing it to back up), bacteremia (bacteria in blood) and history of urinary tract infections.R8's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, clear speech, usually understood and could understand. R8 had a urinary catheter. R8 walked with supervision or touch assistance or used a wheelchair for mobility.R8's physician orders dated 2/10/25, included indwelling catheter. R8's undated care plan, printed on 11/19/25, indicated R8 had an indwelling catheter related to retention. Catheter care per facility policy. During an observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure documentation for 2 of 5 residents (R65 and R5) who refused influenza vaccine included education covering benefit and risk of the vaccine, and name and date of resident or representative who refused the vaccine Findings include:R65's face sheet printed on 11/19/25, indicated R65 was admitted on [DATE], and diagnosis included Parkinson's disease.R65's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, clear speech, was understood and could understand. R65 used a walker or wheelchair for mobility. R65's standing orders dated 6/11/25, indicated may have annual Influenza vaccine unless contraindicated. During record review for immunizations, the immunization section of the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated the influenza vaccine had been refused, however no additional documentation indicated when it had been offered, if education had been provided including benefit and risk, if allergic or contraindicated.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0887 — isolated
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure documentation for 1 of 5 residents (R65) who refused Covid-19 vaccine included education covering benefits and risks of the vaccine, and name and date of resident or representative who refused the vaccine. Findings include:R65's face sheet printed on 11/19/25, indicated R65 was admitted on [DATE], and diagnosis included Parkinson's disease.R65's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, clear speech, was understood and could understand, used a walker or wheelchair for mobility. R65's physician orders did not include Covid-19 immunization. During record review for immunizations, the immunization section of the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated the Covid-19 vaccine had been refused, however no additional documentation included when it had been offered, if education had been provided including benefit and risk, if allergic or contraindicated. During interview on 11/19/2025 at 8:00 a.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure beverageware was completely dry before storing, in order to prevent bacterial growth. This had the potential to affect all 29 residents who resided on second floor. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 10/22/24 at 1:51 p.m., observed multiple beverageware stacked on trays, sitting on an open cart located between kitchenettes on second floor. Observed stacked clear plastic cups, light blue plastic cups, and thermal coffee cups. Condensation was visible in the stacked light blue cups. Dietary aide (DA)-A was asked to pick up and separate a stack of blue cups and looking in the cups, verified moisture was present. In addition, DA-A picked up several thermal coffee cups and verified there was moisture inside the cups as well. DA-A explained when she removed beverageware from the dishwasher, she placed them on the counter on top of a piece of rubber shelf-liner to air dry. DA-A acknowledged moisture remaining in cups could lead to bacterial growth. During an interview on 10/22/24 at 2:05 p.m., dietary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (R264) reviewed who was observed to have medications at the bedside, had been appropriately assessed and deemed appropriate to self-administer medications. Findings include: R264's admission Record printed 10/24/24, identified diagnoses including bloodstream infection, muscle spasm of the back, and lack of blood flow to the muscle. R264's entry tracking record Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified admission date of 10/14/24, and admission from short-term general hospital stay. R264's care plan printed 10/24/24, identified R264 required extensive staff assistance for grooming, transfers, bed mobility, and dressing. Care plan further indicated R264 was at risk for ineffective coping related to health status with interventions of re-orientation, allow time to process, move slowly with cares and give simple explanations. R264's Order Summary Report printed 10/24/24, identified an order for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident status was accurately identified in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 2 residents (R42) reviewed for elopement devices and 1 of 1 resident (R62) reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: R42's Face Sheet, printed 10/24/24, included diagnoses of dementia and senile degeneration of the brain. R42's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], section P, P0200 under alarms, did not include a wander/elopement alarm. During observation and interview on 10/23/24 at 10:58 a.m., R42 was in her wheelchair propelling herself with her feet, and approached room [ROOM NUMBER] (empty room) and opened the closed door. R42 had a wanderguard (bracelet worn to prevent elopement) bracelet on her left lower leg. R42 closed the resident room door without entering and wheeled self towards the unit exit doors, with side of door open to hallway and other door closed. R42 made it to through the door when a staff member…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN