No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Franklin Restorative Care Center

900 3rd Street South, Franklin, MN 55333 · For profit - Corporation · 40 certified beds · (507) 557-2211 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0603) — most recent Apr 20261 immediate-jeopardy citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0603) — most recent Apr 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (65%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
39648 BIA-3 · (507) 697-8600 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1110 E Broadway St · (507) 637-3492 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
114 Vernon Ave · (507) 249-3173 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.6%18.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.1%4.1%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.9%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%2.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.9%4.1%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.9%4.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.6%20.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.2%12.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine75.7%96.1%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.9%5.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.2%24.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table25.6%17.1%17.1%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

0.31
RN hours/ resident / day
0.90
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.99
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.19
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.16
RN hoursweekends
64.8%
Total nursing turnover
100.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 35.0 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.19 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.28 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 65% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-23)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2025-05-28)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · L2026-06-23 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, video/audio recording review and document review, the facility administration directed staff not to report or document a resident elopement. The administration's direction not to report, prevented immediate identification and correction of failures in supervision, alarm response, staff training, and elopement prevention, leaving residents exposed to continued risk of elopement and serious injury and demonstrated a breakdown of the facility's governing systems for resident protection, quality assurance, and promoted an ongoing culture of fear of the facility being shut down, retaliation and regulatory noncompliance. The former director of nursing (DON), regional clinical consultant (RCC), chief operating officer (COO), social service designee (SSD), and owner all failed to ensure allegations of reportable events were reported to the State Agency (SA) and thoroughly investigated to protect a resident (R4) from further occurrence. This noncompliance had the potential to affect all 31 residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and document reviews, the facility failed to adequately supervise and maintain resident safety when resident (R4), with a history of exiting the facility unsupervised, eloped through the front door of the facility, and drove an employee vehicle in the parking lot. This resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation for R4. In addition, the facility failed to implement a system to ensure adequate supervision was provided for R4, when the exit alarm system panel was not labeled to alert staff to the exit door that R4 opened. The IJ began on 6/6/2026, when R4, who was assessed to be an elopement risk, was exhibiting exit seeking behavior just prior to the incident, exited through the front door of the facility, was able to enter an employee's vehicle with the keys inside, and drove across the employee parking lot before being observed by staff. The facility Administrator and the regional clinical coordinator (RCC) were notified of the IJ on 6/18/26 at 4:35 p.m. The IJ was removed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and document review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate falls, establish adequate fall prevention interventions, and follow care planned fall interventions for 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R5) reviewed for falls. This resulted in actual harm when R1 fell and required a visit to the emergency department resulting in a fractured left tenth rib. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet dated 9/30/24, indicated R1 had hemiplegia affecting her right dominant side, dementia, disorientation, and muscle weakness. R1's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE], indicated R1 was a high risk for falls. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had severe cognitive impairment, had two or more falls without injury, and needed limited assistance with transfers, toilet use, and bed mobility. R1's care plan undated, indicated R1 was at high risk for falls and to ensure R1 was wearing appropriate footwear: non-skid socks or tennis shoes when ambulating or mobilizing in wheelchair.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure call lights were functional and within reach for 3 of 8 residents (R1, R5, and R7) reviewed for call light placement.Findings include:R1's significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 had severe cognitive impairment and needed staff assistance with toileting, transfers, dressing, and bed mobility. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and malnutrition. R1's fall focus care plan identified R1 was at risk for falls related to incontinence, poor communication/comprehension, psychoactive drug use, mental health diagnoses, and behavior of throwing herself backwards. Interventions included be sure call light is within reach and courage her to use it for assistance if needed. During observation and interview on 6/17/26 at 9:34 a.m., R1 was lying in bed and stating she needed to use the bathroom. R1 was unable to locate her call light and when it was given to her, she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the resident representative regarding changes to skin integrity, weight loss, and accidents for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed for change in condition. Findings include:R1's significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 had severe cognitive impairment and needed staff assistance with toileting, transfers, dressing, and bed mobility. Diagnoses included intellectual disability, schizophrenia, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, malnutrition, and dehydration. The MDS also indicated R1 had no skin issues, had two or more falls without injury, required a mechanically altered diet, and had a significant weight loss. R1's care plan lacked a focus or intervention that related to when and why to contact R1's guardian. There was no documentation of R1 having a guardian. R1's Department of Human Services letter dated 12/5/24, identified R1's guardian was a delegate or designee of the Commission of Human Services through…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an elopement from the facility was recognized and reported to the state agency (SA) for 1 of 1 resident (R4) reviewed for elopement. Findings include:R4's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Lewy bodies dementia (a progressive brain disorder that affects thinking, memory, movement, sleep, and behavior), depression, hallucinations, anxiety disorder, and bipolar disorder (mental health condition characterized by severe, unusual shifts in mood and energy levels). R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition and indicated he experienced delusions; had acute mental status changes; behaviors of inattention, disorganized thinking; and physical and verbal behaviors towards others. R4's MDS indicated he ambulated independently without assistive devices on and off the unit and indicated he displayed wandering behaviors daily. R4's Elopement Risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a report of elopement for 1 of 1 resident (R4). Findings include:R4's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Lewy bodies dementia (a progressive brain disorder that affects thinking, memory, movement, sleep, and behavior), depression, hallucinations, anxiety disorder, and bipolar disorder (mental health condition characterized by severe, unusual shifts in mood and energy levels). R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition and indicated he experienced delusions; had acute mental status changes; behaviors of inattention, disorganized thinking; and physical and verbal behaviors towards others. R4's MDS indicated he ambulated independently without assistive devices on and off the unit and indicated he displayed wandering behaviors daily. R4's Elopement Risk Evaluation dated 5/21/26, identified R4 was at risk for elopement with a score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to monitor, report, and implement timely interventions for 1 of 2 residents (R1) reviewed for significant weight loss.Findings include:R1's significant change in status minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated severely impaired cognition. Diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, moderate intellectual disabilities, protein-calorie malnutrition, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and dysphagia.R1's Nutritional assessment dated [DATE], identified R1 was malnourished, independent with eating after meal set up, did not receive a therapeutic nutritional supplement, did not use dentures as they were poor fitting, had poor meal intakes, was at risk for dehydration due to vomiting. The assessment further identified R1's admission weight 30 days prior was 179 pounds, but current weight was not documented and left blank. There was no change in weight and either no weight loss or gain or unknown if there was a weight loss or gain. R1's total…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the infection prevention and control program included ongoing surveillance, analysis, and trending of resident and staff infections. Additionally, the facility failed to maintain knowledge of a current list of reportable communicable diseases, including when and to whom communicable diseases, healthcare-associated infections, and potential outbreaks must be reported. This had the potential to affect all 34 residents who resided in the facility. In addition, the facility failed to ensure adherence to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) when nursing staff failed to wear personal protective equipment (gowns) when providing direct care to 2 of 2 residents (R4, R22) reviewed for pressure wounds. Findings include: INFECTION CONTROL PROGRAM/ COMMUNICABLE DISEASE LIST Review of the Infection Surveillance Report dated 1/1/26–3/31/26 revealed documentation that included resident name, room number, infection onset date, signs and symptoms,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-23 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program specific to antibiotic stewardship. The facility did not have a system to track antibiotic use, culture results, organisms identified, or antibiotic resistance to ensure residents received appropriate treatment, this had the ability to affect all 34 residents. Findings Include:Review of the Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) case list dated 1/1/26-3/31/26, , documentation included resident name, room number, onset date, signs and symptoms, current prescription, prescriber, infection type, organism, diagnosis, and category. However, the log lacked documentation of the date cultures were obtained, organisms identified from culture results, and whether organisms were resistant to prescribed antibiotics.On 4/21/26 at 11:21 a.m., registered nurse (RN)-A , identified as the infection prevention nurse, stated antibiotic use was not tracked. RN-A stated the facility completed a log to monitor possible infections and confirmed antibiotic tracking was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-23 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — pattern
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from involuntary seclusion when the facility maintained locked exit doors that prevented residents from freely exiting the building, without conducting individualized assessments, clinical justification, or care planning to support the restriction. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 8 of 34 residents (R4, R6, R11, R16, R20, R7, R29, R39) residing at the facility.Findings include: R4's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated moderately impaired cognition, very important to go outside to get fresh air when the weather is good, no exhibited behaviors of wandering, utilized a motorized wheelchair independently. R4's care plan printed [DATE], indicated able to use powered wheelchair without any issue, able to wheel w/c (wheelchair) independently throughout and outside facility, independent for going in/out of facility backdoor to courtyard to smoke, not an elopement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were coded accurately on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 2 of 5 residents (R11 and R29) reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include:R11's face sheet printed 4/22/26, indicated diagnoses of type two diabetes with complications, alcohol abuse, and weakness.R11's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, no rejection of care, use of wheelchair, independent with dressing and hygiene, and section N identified R11 took an anticoagulant.R11's physician's orders printed 4/22/26, did not include an anticoagulant but did include and order for aspirin oral capsule 81mg by mouth one time a day.R11's care plan revised 4/16/26, did not include mention of an anticoagulant medication.R29's face sheet printed 4/22/26, indicated diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure, repeated falls, and systolic heart failure.R29's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, rejection of care one to three days, use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to report elevated blood glucose levels per provider order for 1 of 1 residents (R5) reviewed for insulin. In addition, the facility failed to calibrate blood glucose monitors according to manufacturer instructions for 1 of 1 residents (R5) reviewed for insulin. Further, the facility failed to ensure monitoring of skin wounds for 1 of 1 resident (R22) reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. Findings include: ELEVATED BLOOD GLUCOSE AND CALIBRATION OF MONITOR R5's face sheet received on 4/22/26, included diagnoses of diabetes with hyperglycemia (elevated blood sugar). R5's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, clear speech, could understand and be understood. R5 was independent with most activities of daily living, did not walk and could propel wheelchair independently. R5's provider order dated 7/31/25, indicated blood sugar checks two times a day. Order dated 6/21/21, indicated staff were to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to follow provider orders for wound care dressing changes for 1 of 1 resident (R4) reviewed for pressure injury.Findings include:R4's face sheet provided on 4/22/26, included diagnoses of paraplegia (paralysis causing impairment of motor sensory function of lower extremities) and pressure ulcers to right and left buttock.R4's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, clear speech, could understand and be understood. No behaviors. Pressure ulcer to sacral region. Independent with most activities of daily living. Mobility per motorized wheelchair.R4's provider orders dated 4/22/26, indicated: sacrum dressing: cleanse coccyx with wound cleanser. Place calcium alginate (absorbent dressing used primarily for managing exudate in wounds) in wound bed. Place barrier cream around peri-wound. Cover with ABD (abdominal pad) and tape down. Two times a day, start 4/22/26.R4's care plan dated 11/23/21, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure consulting pharmacist recommendations were addressed or acted upon for 2 of 5 residents (R8, R28) reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include:R28's face sheet received on 4/23/26, included diagnoses of wedge compression fracture of lumbar vertebrae, hypertension, dependence on renal dialysis, hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat in the blood), depression, diabetes, congestive heart failure (heart not able to pump enough blood) and anemia. R28's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated her brief interview for mental status (BIMS) was 99, indicating the cognitive interview was not able to be completed. R28 had clear speech, could understand and be understood. Behaviors included rejection of care and verbal behaviors directed towards others. R28 was dependent upon staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) and didn't walk. R28's orders included 28 medications. R28's care plan identified diagnoses and problem…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    I'm not sure if this is correct, I used other surveyors tags as guidiance, and their tag from last year. Let me know if you want me to change anything. Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was scheduled for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. This had the potential to affect at 35 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: The Facility's PBJ Staffing report 1705D dated quarter 1 2025 October 1st-Decemeber 31st, indicated the facility had triggered the following staffing concerns: 1. One star staffing rating. 2. Excessively low weekend staffing. 3. No RN hours. Review of the facility's license staff schedule for May 10th, 2025, and May 24th, 2025, confirmed they was no consecutive eight hours of RN coverage in the facility. The Daily Timecards Log dated 5/6/25 -5/10/25, listed punch in and outs times for licensed employees from 5/6/25 -5/10/25, and 5/23/25-5/26/25. These logs confirmed there was no RN coverage on 5/10/25, and 5/24/25. On 5/28/25 at 9:59a.m., the administrator and health unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-28 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all required data were included on the nurse staffing information posted daily. This had the potential to affect all 35 residents residing in the facility and their visitors who may wish to view the information. Findings include: The Facility's PBJ Staffing report 1705D dated quarter 1 2025 October 1st-December 31st, indicated the facility had triggered the following staffing concerns: 1. One star staffing rating. 2. Excessively low weekend staffing. 3. No RN hours. The staff schedule and posting documentation dated from October 2024 through May 2025, was reviewed and the following dates failed to include any or all of the following requirements for the daily staff posting: 1. Facility name. 2. Current date. 3. Facility Census. 4. Total number and actual hours worked by licensed staff. 5. Total number of licensed staff, and their designation or title. October 2024: 10/5/24, 10/12/24,10/13/24, 10/15/24,10/19/24, 10/20/24, 10/24/24, 10/28/24 December 2024: 12/19/24, 12/31/24 February 2025: 2/6/25, 2/17/25, 2/23/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure dishwasher temperatures were within the manufactures minimum temperatures to ensure resident dishes were sanitized. In addition, the facility failed to ensure temperatures were monitored in 4 of 4 refrigerators and 2 of 2 freezers reviewed for the kitchen. This had the potential to affect all 35 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: On 5/18/25 at 1:50 p.m., during the initial walk through of the kitchen the dishwashing machine was being used by a nursing assistant (NA)-A, the machine was labeled a [NAME] Temp star Dishwasher with temperature requirements as follows: wash temperature 150 degrees Fahrenheit (F), and rinse temperature of 180 degrees F. The actual temperatures observed were as follows: 1. 2:02 p.m., wash -165 degrees F, rinse -170 degrees F 2. 2:03 p.m., wash -164 degrees F, rinse -168 degrees F 3. 2:04 p.m., wash -165 degrees F, rinse -170 degrees F 4. 2:05 p.m., wash -154 degrees F, rinse -160…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program effectively sustained ongoing compliance related to repeat citations from past surveys regarding immunizations. This had the potential to affect all 35 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility CASPER Report dated 4/16/25, indicated the facility was cited F883 for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations on the survey exited 3/28/24. See F883: Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 residents (R10, R27, R31) reviewed for immunizations were offered and/or provided the pneumococcal vaccine series as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to help reduce the risk of associated infection(s). The facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee meeting minutes from April 2024 through May 2025 lacked ongoing data related to the above repeat citation. On 5/28/25 at 5:31 p.m., the administrator acknowledged the importance of continued monitoring of prior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-28 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent, including risks and benefits, for 4 out of 4 residents (R8, R15, R22, R27) reviewed for use of psychotropic medications. Findings include: R8's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R8 was admitted [DATE], was moderately cognitively impaired, and had the following diagnoses: hypertension (HTN) (high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (HLD) (high level of fat content in the bloodstream), dementia, and depression. R8's order report summary dated 5/20/25, indicated R8 was currently prescribed mirtazapine (antidepressant) with a start date of 4/23/2025, and Olanzapine (antipsychotic) start date 9/5/2024. R8's Order recap report dated 5/21/25, indicated original start dates for the Mirtazapine was 11/3/2023, and olanzapine was 7/2/2024. Additionally, R8 has a discontinued order for lorazepam (benzodiazepine) start date 7/12/2024 end date 9/5/2024 and paroxetine (antidepressant/anti-panic) original start date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to implement a system to monitor stored narcotics to prevent diversion. This had the potential to affect all 16 residents prescribed Schedule II-V medications. Findings include: On 5/21/25 at approximately 11:00 a.m., assistant director of nursing/infection preventionist (ADON/IP) confirmed the following: 1. The facility's West Individual Narcotic Record's Index page indicated the last narcotic entered on the Index page was Lyrica entered on page 55. However, the narcotic book had medications documented through page 127. 2. The facility's East Individual Narcotic Record's Index page indicated the last narcotic entered on the Index page was Lyrica entered on page 55. However, the narcotic book had medications documented through page 127. On 5/28/25 at 11:07 a.m., registered nurse (RN)-A and licensed practical nurse (LPN)-C were observed completing a medication cart narcotic count. LPN-C had the narcotic book. RN-A unlocked the narcotic box in the medication cart, pulled out the first card, called out the number…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacist consultant recommendations were acted upon for 5 of 5 residents (R8, R15, R22, R24, R27) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R8's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R8 was admitted [DATE], was moderately cognitively impaired, and had the following diagnoses: hypertension (HTN) (high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (HLD) (high level of fat content in the bloodstream), dementia, and depression. R8's order report summary dated 5/20/25, indicated R8 was currently prescribed the following medications: 1. Mirtazapine (antidepressant) take 2 tablets by mouth daily, and take 1 tablet 7.5 mg by mouth daily 2. Olanzapine (antipsychotic) 2.5 mg by mouth twice daily (BID) R8's monthly pharmacy reconciliations were reviewed for the last 6 months. Of those, the corresponding months had the following recommendations: 1. April 2025-Pharmacist requested laboratory work up for Olanzapine, as none had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review, interview, and observation the facility failed to ensure shared resident refrigerator 1 of 1 was kept in sanitary conditions and 2 of 2 (shared resident refrigerator and medication refrigerator) reviewed for temperature control were monitored. Findings include: On 5/19/25 at 11:03 a.m. a shared resident refrigerator was observed to contain multiple open, and undated bottles, and a container of milk. Two bottles of pepsi, a bottle of flavored water, and a container of chocolate milk. All opened and undated in the refrigerator. In the freezer, there was a large box of orange popsicles with had melted. There was a large amount of sticky orange substance on the floor of the freezer which encompassed a Tupperware container containing an unknown item. The container was affixed to the floor of the refrigerator by the orange substance. The certified dietary manager (CDM) confirmed the residents used this refrigerator and freezer. Both were unsanitary and unappealing. The CDM was unsure of the last time the refrigerator had been cleaned. The temperature logs of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a self-administration of medications assessment was completed, and orders obtained, for all medications kept at bedside for 1 of 1 residents (R24) observed with medications at their bedside. Findings include: R24's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], indicated R24 was cognitively intact, and diagnoses included diabetes, heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). On 5/20/25 at 7:39 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-B was observed setting up R24's morning medications but was unable to locate R24's fluticasone-salmeterol (Advair) inhaler in the medication cart. Trained medication assistant (TMA)-A suggested LPN-B look on R24's bedside table to see if the inhaler had been left in R24's room the previous night. On 5/20/25 at 7:59 a.m., when LPN-B entered R24's room to administer his medications, R24's Advair discus was observed on R24's bedside table and was within R24's reach. When LPN-B asked R24 about the Advair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN-CMS-10055) was provided to 1 of 3 residents (R143) reviewed for beneficiary notification. Findings include: R143's discharge minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R143 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 3/27/2025, and their Medicare part A services ended on 2/19/2025. R143's SNFABN-CMS-10055 signed on 2/19/25, informed them services would end on 2/19/2025. However, this notice was given outside of the 48 hours prior to services ending requirement, and was provided the same day as services ending. On 5/19/25 at 2:41 p.m., the office manager (OM) stated they were responsible for completing the Medicare SNFABN-0CMS-10055 forms, and they were expected to provide them to the resident 48 hours prior to the end of services. OM stated they were typically informed by therapies or the MDS nurse when someone's services were ending. OM confirmed R143 was given their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident living areas were free from unwanted noise for 3 of 4 residents (R3, R14, R22) reviewed for uncomfortable sound levels. This had the potential to affect residents in surrounding rooms, visitors and facility staff. Findings include: R3's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R3 was cognitively intact, and diagnoses included schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and delusional disorders. R14's significant change MDS, dated [DATE], indicated R14 was cognitively intact, and diagnoses included major depressive disorder, mood affective disorder, and diabetes. R22's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], indicated R22 was cognitively intact, and diagnoses included chronic tension-type headache, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. On 5/20/25 at 7:39 a.m., during a medication administration observation, a continuous, loud, high-pitched, obstructive noise was heard…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure ordered as needed (PRN) antipsychotic medications were limited to a 14-day time period and clinical rational indicated continuation past the 14-day time period. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a gradual dose reduction (GDR) or appropriate indication for use for medications was documented for 2 of 4 residents (R15, and R27) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R15's admission MDS dated [DATE], indicated R15 was admitted on [DATE], was moderately cognitively impaired, and had the following diagnoses: anemia (low iron count in the bloodstream), heart failure (failure of the heart to pump blood efficiently), renal insufficiency (kidneys inability to filter blood efficiently), diabetes, HLD, and anxiety. R15's order summary report dated 5/20/25, indicated R15 was currently prescribed alprazolam (benzodiazepine) 0.5 mg (milligrams)-give two tablets by mouth every 6 hours PRN, with a start date of 2/14/2025. R15's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to update the care plan for 1 of 2 residents (R31) reviewed for pressure ulcer interventions. Findings include: R31's significant change minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R31 was cognitively intact and had the following diagnoses: osteoporosis (deterioration of bone structure), thyroid disorder, malnutrition, and depression. R5's care plan last reviewed 4/21/25, indicated R31 has the potential for nutrition/hydration problems and an intervention listed was Arginaid Oral packet (Nutritional Supplements) give one packet by mouth two times daily to aid with wound healing. R5's physician orders accessed 5/27/25, indicated following order: Arginaid Oral Packet (Nutritional Supplements) give 1 packet by mouth two times daily was stated on 2/14/2024 and discontinued on 8/26/2024. On 5/27/25 at 1:48 p.m., the licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A stated the charge nurse on duty was responsible for updating the care plans when necessary. LPN-A stated there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to accurately implement physician orders for 1 of 1 resident (R5) reviewed for weekly weight monitoring. Findings include: R5's annual minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R5 was cognitively intact, and had the following diagnoses: neurogenic bladder, paraplegia (has lost use of some of their limbs), malnutrition, and depression. R5's physician order list accessed 5/22/25, indicated a physician order which started on 12/27/23 indicated weekly weights and vitals on bath day as an active order. R5's care plan last reviewed 3/14/25, indicated R5 was at risk for potential nutrition/hydration problems, and to monitor weights per MD order and/or facility policy. R5's electronic medical administration record (eMAR) and treatment administration record (TAR) were reviewed from December 2024 through May 2025, and the last documented weight for R5 was on 12/25/24. On 5/27/25 at 1:48 p.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A stated the nurse on duty was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain separately locked and permanently affixed compartments for storage of controlled medications in the medication room refrigerator reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: On 5/20/25 at 10:00 a.m., a vial of Lorazepam Oral Concentrate USP 2 mg/ml (2 milligrams of medication/per milliliter of liquid) a schedule IV (four) controlled Substance was observed in the door of the refrigerator outside of the double lock box. The lock box was not permanently secured to the refrigerator and had a key in the lock. Licensed practical nurse (LPN)-B stated they were agency staff and confirmed the unaffixed lock box, with key, had been there since they had started working in the facility. LPN-B confirmed the key was always left in the box. LPN-B confirmed the Ativan should have been stored and locked in the lock box. Next, writer and LPN-B went to confirm the Ativan medication count in the narcotic box, which was correct, and the Director of nursing (DON) passed by. At 10:14 a.m., the DON came into the medication room and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 residents (R10, R27, R31) reviewed for immunizations were offered and/or provided the pneumococcal vaccine series as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to help reduce the risk of associated infection(s). Findings include: A CDC Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults feature, dated 10/24, identified various tables when each (or all) of the pneumococcal vaccinations should be obtained. This identified when an adult over [AGE] years old had received the complete series (i.e., PPSV23 and PCV13; see below) then the patient and provider may choose to administer Pneumococcal 20-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20) for patients who had received Pneumococcal 13-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV13) at any age and Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine 23 (PPSV23) at or after [AGE] years old. R10's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R10 was [AGE] years old and diagnoses included dementia, diabetes, rheumatoid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 residents (R26) reviewed for immunizations were offered and/or provided the COVID-19 vaccine to help reduce the risk of associated infection(s). Findings include: R26's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), indicated R26 diagnoses included mild cognitive impairment, transient ischemic attack (TIA) and cerebral infarction (stroke), and aortic valve stenosis. R26's immunization report, dated 5/21/25, indicated R26 had not received any COVID-19 vaccinations. R26's immunization consent form indicated R26 was offered and signed consent to receive the COVID-19 vaccine on 4/26/24. However, R26's record lacked evidence the facility provided the requested COVID-19 vaccine. On 5/28/25 at 3:54 p.m., director of nursing (DON) verified R26's clinical record lacked evidence the facility provided the COVID-19 vaccine to R26. DON stated the COVID-19 vaccine was important to prevent the spread of infection and staff were expected to review and offer immunizations upon admission and quarterly at care conferences. The facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for pressure ulcer (PU) wound care for 3 of 3 resident (R1, R4, and R5) reviewed for wound care. Findings include: Stage II pressure ulcer: partial-thickness loss of skin with exposed dermis. The wound bed is viable, pink or red, moist, and may also present as an intact or ruptured serum-filled blister. Adipose (fat) is not visible and deeper tissues are not visible. Granulation tissue, slough and eschar are not present. Stage III pressure ulcer: full-thickness loss of skin, in which adipose (fat) is visible in the ulcer and granulation tissue and epibole (rolled wound edges) are often present. Slough and/or eschar may be visible. The depth of tissue damage varies by anatomical location; areas of significant adiposity can develop deep wounds. Undermining and tunneling may occur. Fascia, muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage and/or bone are not exposed. Stage IV pressure ulcer: full-thickness skin and tissue loss…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was performed during wound care for 2 of 3 residents (R4 and R5) reviewed for wound care. Findings include: R4's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R4 was cognitively intact and needed extensive assistance with bed mobility and personal hygiene. R4's provider orders dated 4/17/25, indicated R4 had a dressing order to cleanse R4's laceration on her left lower buttock with wound cleanser, apply skin barrier prep around edges, and apply a bordered silicone dressing every 2 days. R5's significant change MDS dated [DATE], indicated R5 was cognitively intact and needed extensive assistance with bed mobility and personal hygiene. R5's provider orders dated 2/18/25, indicated R5 had a dressing order to cleanse R5's left elbow with wound cleanser and cover with foam adhesive bandage daily. During an observation on 4/30/25 at 10:47 a.m., the infection preventionist (IP)-A entered R4's room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility's request for a waiver was accepted and approved by the State Agency following the survey dated 12/22/22. The tag was re-issued however NO plan of correction is required. This will remain in effect until such time as the registered nurse (RN) coverage can be filled and the facility achieves compliance. F727: CFR 483.35 (b)(1), RN coverage 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. Findings include: Review of 10/1/2023 through 3/15/24 nursing schedule identified 8 days of no registered nurse (RN) had been scheduled on Saturdays or Sundays. Interview on 3/28/24 at 5:00 p.m., with the administrator identified they were aware of the lack of coverage, they are working to stagger hours and have utilized an RN from a sister facility (in-network facility) in an attempt to meet the requirement. Review of the current advertisements in various sources per their waiver plan for available positions identified the facility was actively attempting to hire full time RN for coverage to meet the requirement.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-28 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data, during 1 of 1 quarter reviewed (Quarter 1) 2024 (October 1 - December 31) to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) according to specifications established by CMS. Findings include: Review of the Payroll Based Journal Report (PBJ) [NAME] Report 1705 D identified the following dates triggered for review 10/07/23, 10/8/23, 11/18/23, 12/16/23, 12/17/23 for failure to have licensed nurse coverage 24 hours per day. Review of staffing schedules and staff timecards identified the facility had 1 or more licensed nursing staff present on the above identified dates and therefore data submitted through PBJ to CMS was inaccurate. Interview on 3/28/24, at 5:00 p.m., with administrator identified they have a person offsite that enters the PBJ data, and she would have to reach out to him for more information. No other information was provided by the end of the survey. A policy was requested and was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-28 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure data submitted to the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee was analyzed and documented to ensure areas identified had oversight for their perspective outcomes brought forth. This had the potential to affect all 34 residents. Findings include: Review of the monthly QAPI meeting minutes from June 2023 through March 2024 identified department heads were bringing data forth to QAPI on various topics such as infection control, falls, grievance reports, other committee meeting minutes, and incident reports etc., however, there was no documented benchmarks for goals the facility was trying to achieve, nor analysis of data brought forth, identified actions the facility was going to take to achieve their goals, and monitoring to determine if goals were met or QAPI needed to continue monitoring to ensure compliance. Interview on 3/28/24 at 3:10 p.m., with the administrator identified the facility had changed their format for QAPI meetings about a year ago. She revealed that the committee did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to have evidence of 1 of 1 Performance Improvement Project (PIP) which focused on high risk or problem-prone areas identified thorough and appropriate data collection and analysis and evaluation of the identified concern(s) during QAPI. This had the potential to affect all 34 residents. Findings include: Interview on 3/28/24 at 2:57 p.m., with director of nursing identified the facility did not have a formal PIP however, each department would do their own thing. Interview on 3/28/24 at 4:10 p.m., with trained medication aide (TMA)-A identified she had training on the computer of what QAPI was but other than that she knew nothing about QAPI. She revealed that the facility did not tell the staff what the committee was working on. Interview on 3/28/24 at 4:15 p.m., with the administrator who confirmed the facility did not have a formal PIP they were working on. There was no policy related to QAPI or a PIP provided by the end of the survey.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-28 · tag F0944 — widespread
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide mandatory training on 1 of 1 facility specific Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program to include goals and various elements of the program, how the facility intends to implement the program, staff's role in the facility's QAPI program, or how to communicate concerns, problems, or opportunities for improvement to the facility's QAPI program. Findings include: Interview on 3/28/24 at 4:00 p.m., with dietary aide identified she had never had any type of training on QAPI however, maybe other staff did she was unsure. She was not sure how to bring a concern to the QAPI committee and she was unaware if the facility was working on any problems. Interview on 3/28/24 at 4:10 p.m., with trained medication aide (TMA)-A identified she had training on the computer of what QAPI was but other than that she knew nothing about QAPI. She revealed that the facility did not tell the staff what the committee was working on. Interview on 3/28/24 at 4:15 p.m., with the administrator identified the facility staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify the county (designated State Mental Health Authority (SMHA)) when 1 of 1 resident (R15) with new on-set of mental illness. Findings include: R15's 6/6/23, nursing progress note identified R15 required law enforcement along with emergency medical services (EMS) to transport him to the local hospital emergency department for behavioral issues. He was later transported from the hospital to a mental health inpatient facility. R15's current physician's orders identified a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Paranoid Personality Disorder. R15's 8/20/23 quarterly MDS identified R15 re-entered the facility on 6/28/23, and had a new diagnoses of PTSD and Paranoid Personality Disorder. R15's 6/21/23 Pre-admission Screening (PAS) (following his behavioral health inpatient stay), indicated R15 had no diagnosis of mental illness, had no symptoms of mental illness that significantly interfered with functioning in life activities, or caused the person significant distress within the past 6 months, and had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to offer and/or administer the most recent Centers for Disease Control (CDC) pneumococcal vaccine for 2 of 5 residents (R22 and R32) reviewed for immunizations. Furthermore, the facility failed to have a method or system to ensure the facility offer or provided any initial or updated vaccine to residents per Centers for Disease Control (CDC) vaccination recommendations. Findings include: Review of the current CDC pneumococcal vaccine guidelines located at https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/pneumo/hcp/pneumo-vaccine-timing.html, identified for: 1) Adults 19-[AGE] years old with specified immunocompromising conditions, a) the PCV-20 at least 1 year after prior PCV-13, b) the PPSV-23 (dose 1) at least 8 weeks after prior PCV-13 and PPSV-23 (dose 2) at least 5 years after first dose of PPSV-23. Staff were to review the pneumococcal vaccine recommendations again when the resident turns [AGE] years old. 2) Adults [AGE] years of age or older, a) If NO history of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to report an allegation of injury of unknown origin with serious bodily injury timely to the State Agency (SA) for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed who had injury of unknown origin. Findings include: A facility Reported Incident (FRI) submitted to the State Agency (SA) on 9/14/23 3:52 p.m., alleged physical abuse and injury of unknown origin when R1 complained of pain with standing, was unable to stand on his own, and had outward rotation of the left foot. R1 was transferred to the hospital for further evaluation. The report identified on 8/27/23 at 8:30 a.m. staff had become aware of the injury. R1's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 was severely cognitively impaired and was independent with ambulating, transferring, and bed mobility. During an interview on 9/21/23 at 12:10 p.m., the director of nursing (DON) stated she was notified by the phone of R1's injury and transfer to the emergency department (ED) on 8/27/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse. Findings include: A facility reported incident (FRI) to State Agency (SA) dated 8/5/23 at 8:20 p.m., indicated a staff member heard a commotion down the east hallway and found R1 punching R2. R1 punched R2 three times before staff was able to get to the residents. R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 was cognitively intact. R2's diagnoses included paraplegia (paralysis of the legs) and chronic pain. The MDS further indicated R2 used a wheelchair. On 8/6/23 at 2:00 a.m., a progress note indicated staff heard a commotion coming from the east wing. When staff looked down the hallway they could see R1 punching/hitting R2 in the face and shoulder. Staff saw R1 hit R2 three times before getting R1 to stop. Trained medication aide (TMA)-A came over and removed R2, and another staff member took R1 to his room. R2 did not sustain any visible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2026-04-23 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was on duty a minimum of 8 consecutive hours per day for 5 of 7 days reviewed. This had the potential to affect all 34 residents living in the facility.Findings include:Review of nursing schedule in the last 30 days identified no registered nurse (RN) had been scheduled on 3/15/26, 3/16/26, and 4/5/26.On 4/22/26 at 11:54 a.m., the administrator stated the facility had obtained a waiver for RN coverage and the facility was currently working on filling the RN positions and actively recruiting RN staff and offering incentives. During the interview the administrator stated the facility was using agency nursing staff to fill the RN coverage, was actively hiring RN's, was aware not all days had a scheduled RN, and confirmed the facility had a waiver. The administrator stated finding RN's in a rural area was difficult and the facility was competing with other facilities such as homecare, hospice, and hospitals.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ROHINSKY, STEVENIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/01/2020
DOMELER, JOSHUAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/01/2020

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+1.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 5%Other / private 21%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$345per resident / day
operating cost
$10,484per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$348per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Minnesota
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,870/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,573/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245273. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next