Maple Lawn Senior Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 46 beds and averages 34.2 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.06 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.83 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.83 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.28 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-02-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was on duty a minimum of 8 consecutive hours per day, 7 days a week for 1 of 92 days reviewed. This had the potential to affect all 33 residents. Findings include: Review of the facilities November 2025, December 2025, and January 2026 schedules identified on 11/29/25 the facility had no registered nurse on duty. Interview on 2/26/26 at 8:23 a.m., with the director of nursing identified she was responsible for the licensed nurse schedule. She reported she was on duty Monday through Friday 8 consecutive hours and if she needed to leave early, she would ensure there was another RN to cover the 8-hour requirement. On the weekends she ensured there was a RN scheduled 8 consecutive hours and if the facility did not have an RN to work over the weekend, she or another facility RN would come in and cover the RN 8 consecutive hours requirement. She confirmed that there had been no RN coverage on 11/29/25. Review of undated, RN Coverage policy identified the facility would ensure the services of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-02-26 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to designate a qualified person to serve as the director of food service to oversee the dietary department. This had the potential to affect all 33 residents.Findings include: Interview on 2/23/26 at 12:00 p.m., with the facility designated dietary manager (DM) revealed she was not certified. She had been enrolled but dropped the class this past December because of personal life issues that made it difficult for her to continue. She had not submitted any of her course work that was required to complete the class and currently was not enrolled in any program. Interview on 2/24/26 at 11:22 a.m., with the registered dietician identified she was the DM's preceptor and was available to her to help her with any questions and review her coursework, however, her understanding was the DM was out on medical leave and was unable to complete the course work, therefore she had dropped the class. Interview on 2/26/26 at 8:31 a.m., with the administrator identified she would have expected the DM to be certified for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had a care conference to be able to participate in the planning process and development of interventions of their care for 1 of 1 sampled resident (R7) who had been at the facility for 3 months with no care conference scheduled. Findings include: R7's 12/01/25, accepted admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified that R7 had admitted to the facility in the middle of November 2025. R7 cognition was intact. She used a walker or a wheelchair for mobility and required partial assistance with some activities of daily living (ADL's). She had diagnoses of arthritis, thyroid disorder, diabetes, renal disease, and hypertension. R7's plan was to remain living in the facility. Additionally, a 2/20/26, accepted quarterly MDS assessment was completed identifying again R7's cognition was intact. Interview on 2/23/26 at 2:33 p.m., with R7 identified, she had not been invited to or attended a care conference since coming to the facility. Review of R7's progress 11/12/25 through 2/22/26, had no mention of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the ombudsman was notified following discharge from the facility for 3 of 3 sampled residents (R1, R3, and R41). Findings include: R1's 1/2/26, accepted discharge return anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified he had an unplanned discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of nursing progress note dated 12/17/25 at 1:47 p.m., identified R1 was sent to the hospital emergency department via ambulance for evaluation due to having poor color, lips cyanotic, and R1 was shaking. Review of nursing progress note dated 12/22/25 at 12:13 p.m., identified the facility had received a nurse-to-nurse report from the hospital. R1 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE], with diagnoses of acute hypoxia with respiratory failure. R1 returned to the facility on [DATE]. Confirmation of ombudsman notice of discharge was requested for R1; however, the facility did not provide one by the end of the survey period. R3's 2/16/26, accepted modified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 5 sampled residents (R28) reviewed for unnecessary medication review. Findings include: R28's 12/29/25, accepted quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified R28's cognition was intact. R28 used a walker or wheelchair for mobility and required partial to moderate assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADL's). R28 took a daily anticoagulant medication. R28's 2/25/26, printed diagnosis list identified persistent atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm), high blood pressure, history of broken wrist, long term use of anticoagulants (blood thinner) and a history of stroke. R28's 2/24/26, Order Summary Report identified R28 took Apixaban (anticoagulant medication to prevent blood clots or stroke for people with atrial fibrillation) 2.5 milligrams twice a day for atrial fibrillation. There was no order or mention of monitoring for side effects of the anticoagulant medication that can cause bleeding, nausea, and increased…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to appropriately assess, document, and revise the care plan for 1 of 1 sampled resident (R8) who had restorative therapies identified on his care plan, but was not receiving or completing those therapies as indicated. Findings include: R8's 2/16/26, accepted quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified R8's cognition was intact. R8 was noted to have impairments bilaterally on his upper and lower extremities. R8 used a wheelchair for mobility. R8 was independent with eating, required substantial assistance from staff for dressing, personal hygiene, and required total assistance from staff for toileting and bathing. R28 used a Sit to Stand mechanical device with substantial assistance from staff for transfers. R8 was not noted to ambulate. R8 had not participated in any formal type of therapy or restorative program. R8's 2/26/26, printed Medical Diagnosis list identified pulmonary disease, symptoms involving the musculoskeletal system, asthma, tremors, radiculopathy of lumbar region (compressed or irritated nerve…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to re-assess nursing interventions and communicate findings for skin wound for 1 of 1 sampled resident (42) once an open area had been identified by nursing. Findings include: R42's 2/24/26, admission Record identified that R42 was admitted to the facility mid-February 2026, from an assisted living facility. R42 had diagnoses of heart failure, diabetes, dementia, high blood pressure, and a history of stroke. Interview on 2/23/26 at 1:08 p.m., with R42 identified she had a sore on the back of her right leg that the nurse kept covered because otherwise she scratched it.'R42's 2/19/26, baseline care plan identified R42 required partial assistance of one staff for cares, transfers, and ambulation. There was no mention of wounds or risk of wounds on R42's care plan. R42's 2/20/26, Weekly Skin Audit/Bath Form identified 3 small bruises on her left arm, and some bruising was noted on her lower abdomen caused by insulin injections for her diabetes. The skin audit identified there were no open lesions, cuts,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide services to maintain and/or prevent decrease in range- of-motion (ROM) for 1 of 1 sampled resident (R35) reviewed for limited range of motion. Findings include: R35's 8/19/2025, comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified his cognition was moderately impaired. He had diagnoses of cerebral palsy (condition primarily affecting leg movement and muscle stiffness) and dementia. R35's 2/10/26, Functional Abilities and Goals assessment identified R35 was dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL)'s. He had no impairment to his upper extremities but was impaired on both sides of his lower extremities and used a manual wheelchair for mobility. R35's current, undated care plan identified he was at risk for decline in his physical condition related to cerebral palsy (condition primarily affecting leg movement and muscle stiffness) and was dependent on a wheelchair for mobility. The goal was for R35 to participate in a restorative exercise program to maintain his upper body strength.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to discard food that had expired, ensure all foods were labeled and dated, and maintain a clean fan that blew in the direction of clean dishes. This had the potential to affect all 37 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation and interview on 12/16/24 at 10:44 a.m., with the dietary manager (DM) during initial tour of the kitchen. An observation of the refrigerator next to the food prep area contained 2 half gallons of milk with best use by date of 12/13/24. The DM stated the milk should have been tossed out on 12/13/24. The walk-in cooler contained 4 dishes of dessert that was not labeled or dated and a pre-made salad in a bowl that was dated 12/14/24 and was brown in color. The DM stated the dessert appeared to be carrot cake, but she was unsure of when that was last served. She confirmed that the dessert and the pre-made salad needed to be discarded. Observation and interview on 12/16/24 at 11:35 a.m., with the DM of the dishwasher room where there was a fan hanging on the wall across…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 narcotic emergency kit (E-kit) containing controlled and/or narcotic substances did not have expired medications, and ensure the E-kit contents label was updated monthly and current. Findings include: Observation on 12/16/24 at 5:40 p.m., with contract registered nurse RN-(A) of the medication room, identified a large narcotic E-kit, with a red numbered tag of 882350. RN-A stated the red tag indicated the E-kit had not been opened. If the container had a green tag, nursing staff were to use the E-kit list that was taped to the inside of the medication cabinet as a guide to fax the pharmacy of the medications that had been removed from the container and would need to be replaced. Review of July 2023 E-kit medication log identified lorazepam (treats anxiety disorders) 0.5 milligrams (mg) had an expiration date of 1/27/24, warfarin (prevent blood clots) 1 mg tablets had no expiration date listed, prednisone (reduces inflammation) 10 mg tablet with an expiration date of 1/7/24, doxycycline…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN