Glenfields Living With Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 55 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 46.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 95.4 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.34 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.01 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.98 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.46 to 1.03 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was completed for 2 of 2 residents (R8, R63) observed for wound care and failed to properly implemented enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 4 of 4 residents (R8, R63, R66, R73)) reviewed for contact precautions. Findings include: R8's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], included R8 was cognitively intact, was able to make self be understood and was able to understand others. R8 had a diagnosis of stage 4 pressure ulcer on her sacral region (a wound caused by pressure extending to underlying tissue like muscle, bone or tendon), multiple sclerosis (MS)(a disease that can cause weakness, pain, fatigue and impaired coordination), and malnutrition (a lack of proper nutrition). During observation on 6/4/25 at 10:38 a.m., registered nurse (RN)-A completed wound care on R8. RN-A washed hands with soap and water and applied gown and gloves prior to starting wound care. RN-A removed soiled dressing and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan included management and monitoring of anticoagulant (blood thinner) therapy for 2 of 3 residents (R30, R66) reviewed for anticoagulants. Findings include: R30's annual minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated cognitively intact. R30 had diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), hypertension (high blood pressure), and history of cerebral infarction (stroke). R30's electronic medical record (EMR) included an order for Eliquis (a blood thinner) 5 milligrams (mg) twice a day, with a start date of 7/4/23. However, failed to include an order to monitor for potential side effects or signs ob bleeding due to Eliquis use. R30's care plan last revised 5/20/25, failed to include anticoagulants or to monitor for side effects of the medication. R66's admission MDS dated [DATE], indicated severe cognitive impairment. R66 had diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to update the primary care physician (PCP) with significant weight gain for 1 of 1 residents (R66) reviewed for nutrition. Findings Include: R66's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], included R66 had severe cognitive impairment. R66 had diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes, Alzheimer's disease (a condition that affects memory, thinking, and behavior), and obstructive sleep apnea (a collapse or closure of the airway during sleep). R66's weight was recorded at 252 pounds (lbs). According to R66's electronic medical record (EMR) on 02/12/2025, R66 weighed 252.0 lbs. On 05/28/2025, R66 weighed 292.0 pounds which was a 15.87 % gain. R66's weight change note dated 2/26/25, included a weight warning that was not likely nutrition related and that the nurse manager was notified to follow up. R66's health status note dated 3/8/25, included R66 had audible wheezing and a 13 lb weight increase since 2/2/25. No update to PCP was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently offer range of motion (ROM) and exercises for 1 of 1 residents (R8) reviewed for restorative nursing program. Findings include: R8's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], included R8 was cognitively intact, able to make self be understood, and able to understand others. R8 had a diagnoses of stage 4 pressure ulcer on her sacral region (a wound caused by pressure extending to underlaying tissue like muscle, bone or tendon), multiple sclerosis (MS)(a disease that can cause weakness, pain, fatigue and impaired coordination), and malnutrition (a lack of proper nutrition). During interview on 6/2/25 at 1:11 p.m., R8 stated she was supposed to get ROM exercises, but staff do not always offer them to her. R8 wanted to complete ROM exercises because she knew it was important to prevent weakness from MS. R8's task documentation for restorative program - exercise orders for dates 5/15/25 to 6/4/25, included 12 yes responses, 3 no responses,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review and interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to maintain safety for 1 of 4 (R1) residents reviewed for choking risks and refusal of care. Findings include: R1's face sheet dated 6/28/24, indicated diagnoses of hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis or weakness) and hemiparesis (one-sided muscle weakness) following stroke affecting left non-dominant side, vascular dementia (lack of blood to carry blood to a part of the brain, results in problems with reasoning, judgement, planning, and memory) with other behavioral disturbance, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, type II diabetes, need for assistance with personal care, reduced mobility, depression, dysphagia pharyngoesophageal phase (when the brain makes the decision to swallow and several reflexes begin) and dysphagia oropharyngeal phase (the first phase of swallowing when food or liquid is contained in the mouth by the tongue and palate). R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff were following standard precaution guidelines to prevent the spread of infection by wearing personal protective equipment (PPE), while processing contaminated linens. This had the potential to affect all 80 resident who resided within the facility. Finding include: On 8/29/23 at 1:04 p.m., nursing assistant (NA)-D provided a tour of the soiled utility room and described the process for rinsing out heavily soiled linen in the hopper. It was observed that the hopper did not have a protective splash screen on the hopper, it was on the floor next to the hopper. NA-D stated she would use gloves to rinse and soak the heavily soiled linens in the hopper. NA-D stated she did not typically wear a protective gown or eye wear, only gloves when using the hopper. On 8/29/23 at 1:15 p.m., NA-C provided a tour of the second soiled utility room and described the process for rinsing out heavily soiled linens. NA-C stated she was not aware any protective gown or eye wear to be worn when using the hopper only gloves. An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure nails were trimmed and clean for 1 of 1 residents (R6) reviewed for dependant cares. Findings include: Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) identified R6 required extensive to total staff assistance with personal hygiene and grooming. She was moderately cognitively impaired. R6's care plan printed 8/30/23, indicated maximum assist from another person to complete personal hygiene. R6's's face sheet printed 8/30/23, included diagnoses of Alzheimer's and diabetes mellitus (DM). On 8/28/23 at 1:06 p.m., R6 was observed to have ½ inch long painted fingernails, with a dark brown, unknown substance caked under each nail on both hands. On 8/29/22, at 10:39 a.m., R6 was observed with ½ inch long fingernails, and a dark brown, unknown substance caked under each nail on both hands. On 8/29/23 at 11:44 a.m., certified nursing assistant (CNA)-C confirmed R6's fingernails were long, dirty, and needed to be clipped. She stated they usually do nails on bath day or sometimes with 1:1 activity unless the resident refused. CNA-C stated R6…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to follow order for treatment and reduction of a pressure ulcer for 1 of 2 residents (R40) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: R40's Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition (able to fully understand). Diagnoses of medically complex conditions (more than one complicated medical diagnosis), anemia (not enough red blood cells), heart failure, and hypertension (high blood pressure). Further, R40 was at risk for pressure ulcers (bed sores) and had an unstageable pressure ulcer present on admission. R40 received pressure ulcer care. R40's orders dated 8/23/23, indicated apply L'Nard splints (heel protecting shoes) to both feet, to keep heels elevated, and wear at all times. R40's care plan revised on 7/5/23, indicated potential for pressure ulcers to upper and lower extremities. Care plan identified intervention of administer medications and treatments as ordered. On 8/27/23 at 2:30 p.m., R40 was seated in a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in MN