Mapleton Community Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 49.4 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.91 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.34 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 18% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and document review the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) accurately reflected the resident's fall history for 2 of 3 residents (R2 and R10) reviewed for falls. Findings include: R2's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated impaired cognition, no behaviors or rejection of care, use of wheelchair, one fall with no injury, one fall with minor injury, and diagnoses of non-traumatic brain dysfunction, high blood pressure, and Alzheimer's disease. R2's care plan dated 11/2/23, indicated at risk for falls related to poor balance, assistive devices for mobility, psychotropic medication use, history of falls. Ensure non-slip footwear, follow facility fall protocol, if sitting on the edge of the bed to play cards, ensure that her bed is made or have her sit in the recliner. R2's facility progress notes reviewed on 6/29/26, indicated falls on 11/17/25, 1/7/26, 3/29/26, 3/30/26, 4/14/26, 4/18/26, 5/18/26, 5/23/26, and 6/15/26. R2's quarterly MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and document review, the facility failed to revise and update the comprehensive care to include new fall interventions implemented for 3 of 3 residents (R2, R3, and R10) reviewed for falls. Findings include: R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R10 had no cognitive impairment, utilized a walker, independent with walking, diagnoses included Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, repeated falls, chronic pain, had falls since admission or the prior assessment, one fall with no injury and one fall with injury (except major). R10's care plan dated 4/29/26, indicated R10 was at risk for falls r/t (related to) poor balance and history of falls and interventions included: anticipate and meet R10's needs, call light within reach and encourage her to use it for assistance as needed and follow facility fall protocol. R10's Accident Report documents which included interdisciplinary team review/investigation decision indicated: Review of R10's Accident Reports,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess new bruises and abrasions for 1 of 2 residents (R3) reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions.Findings include:R3's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated severely impaired cognition, no behaviors, diagnoses of arthritis, hip fracture, dementia, and use of anticoagulant (blood thinning medication).R3's care plan dated 11/23/24, indicated self-care performance deficit related to recent hip fracture and repair. Skin inspection: requires weekly skin inspection. Observe for redness, open areas, scratches, cuts, bruises and report changes to the nurse.During observation on 6/29/26 at 10:39 a.m., R3 was walking in the hallway independently with wheeled walker. R3 stated she fell about a month ago and broke her hip.R3's nursing admission/readmission evaluation completed by registered nurse (RN)-B dated 5/26/26, indicated skin issues present, right antecubital bruising from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure interventions developed following resident falls were implemented through a system that was available to staff to prevent further falls for 3 of 3 residents (R2, R3, R10) reviewed for accidents.Findings include:R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R10 had no cognitive impairment, utilized a walker, independent with walking, diagnoses included Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, repeated falls, chronic pain, had falls since admission or the prior assessment, one fall with no injury and one fall with injury (except major).R10's care plan dated 4/29/26, indicated R10 was at risk for falls r/t (related to) poor balance and history of falls and interventions included: anticipate and meet R10's needs, call light within reach and encourage her to use it for assistance as needed and follow facility fall protocol.R10's Accident Report documents which included interdisciplinary team review/investigation decision…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to implement appropriate infection prevention and control practices by ensuring Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP), including gown and glove use during wound care, were implemented for 2 of 2 residents (R5 and R11) reviewed for skin conditions and by ensuring transmission-based contact precautions, including gown and glove use during direct personal care, were implemented for 1 of 1 resident (R58) reviewed for infection prevention. Findings include: R5's face sheet printed 6/30/26, indicated diagnoses of blister of left and right lower leg. R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, no rejection of care, use of wheelchair, dependent for dressing and hygiene, and application of ointments/medications and nonsurgical dressings. R5's care plan dated 9/28/23, indicated potential for pressure ulcer development, goal of skin remaining intact through review dates, and interventions of administering…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-30 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to offer the recommended update for pneumococcal immunizations for 2 of 5 residents (R1, R9), reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: R1's face sheet printed on 6/30/26, included diagnoses of dementia, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure (when the heart does not pump as well as it should) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung condition that obstructs airflow and causes breathing difficulty).R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, clear speech, could understand and be understood. R1 was dependent upon staff for activities of daily living (ADLs).R1's physician orders did not include vaccinations.R1's vaccine history indicated pneumococcal 23-valent vaccine was received in 2011.PneumoRecs VaxAdvisor application, a product created by the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) for healthcare providers to determine which pneumococcal vaccines were needed, recommended to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide timely repositioning and toileting for 1 of 3 residents (R5) reviewed for pressure ulcer care and who was dependent on staff for repositioning, toileting, and who had a PU on her sacrum. Findings include:R5's face sheet received on 8/20/25, included diagnoses of a stage 4 pressure ulcer (PU) to sacral region, and obesity.R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated severe cognitive impairment. R5 had clear speech, was usually understood and could usually understand. R5 was dependent upon staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs) and had no rejection of care. R5 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R5 was at risk for pressure ulcers and had one stage 4 PU present on admission in May 2022. R5's significant change MDS care area assessment (CAA) dated 9/23/24, indicated R5 was at risk for skin breakdown related to decreased mobility, inability to change or shift positions, urinary and bowel…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure safe and appropriate water temperatures were maintained below 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to prevent potential scalding for 2 of 2 residents (R37, R28) observed for accidents and hazards. Findings include:R37's facesheet received on 8/20/25, included diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. R37's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, clear speech, was understood and could understand. R37 was independent with personal hygiene, toileting and toileting hygiene. R37 used a wheelchair and walker for mobility. R37's care plan with revised date of 12/23/23, indicated R37 needed extensive assist with toileting. R37's care plan with revised date 10/27/23, indicated R37 needed extensive assist of one for personal hygiene.During an observation and interview on 8/18/25 at 2:07 p.m., in R37's room, noted water at the bathroom faucet seemed excessively hot to the touch. R37 agreed and stated he didn't want to tell anyone…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was utilized for 1 of 3 residents (R21) reviewed for pressure ulcers.Findings include:R21's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated sever cognitive impairment, one stage two pressure ulcer present on admission, four stage two pressure ulcers present on admission, and diagnoses included open wound left food, open wound left lower leg, open wound left buttock.R21's care plan revised 6/12/25, indicated actual impairment to skin integrity r/t (related to) decreased mobility, poor nutrition, current wounds; complete wound care as ordered.On 8/19/25 at 11:05 a.m., no signage was posted to indicate R21 was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), and registered nurse (RN)-A and nursing assistant (NA)-A were present in R21's room. RN-A and NA-A were observed with gloves on hands, however, were not wearing gowns. RN-A and NA-A were observed to roll R21 from side to side while in bed, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-07-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff followed appropriate infection control practices when handling cups during food service in the dining room. This had potential to affect all 47 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: During an observation on 7/9/24 at 12:00 p.m., when filling cups with juice for residents seated at tables, dietary aide (DA)-A was observed holding the small, clear plastic tumblers by the rim of the cup with bare hands, and when setting the cup on the table. During an observation on 7/9/24 at 12:05 p.m., when filling beverages for residents, observed DA-B pour milk and orange juice into two small, clear plastic tumblers. With bare hands, DA-B set the cups on the table by holding the rim. During an observation on 7/9/24, at 12:07 p.m., when filling beverages for residents, observed DA-B pour coffee into a navy-blue thermal coffee mug and set it on a residents table by holding the rim of the mug. During an observation on 7/9/24 at 12:11 p.m., observed DA-A pour juice for a resident and set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN