Birchwood Care Home
715 West 31st Street, Minneapolis, MN 55408 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (612) 823-7286 Medicaid only — no Medicare
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568)
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.9% | 18.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.3% | 4.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 1.9% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.8% | 4.1% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.7% | 4.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.9% | 20.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 27.7% | 12.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 86.4% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.5% | 5.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 1.9% | 24.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 66.2% | 17.1% | 17.1% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 54.2 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 1.94 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.06 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-07-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (R2) reviewed was free from significant medication errors. This resulted in actual harm for R2 when he became heavily sedated by a psychotropic medication and required treatment in the hospital. Findings include: Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] indicated R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) had a score of 15, indicating she was cognitively intact. R1's relevant diagnoses included schizoid personality disorder, borderline intellectual functioning, and unspecified urinary incontinence. R1's medication order, dated 6/9/22, indicated R1 received clozapine 600 milligrams (mg) by mouth at 8:00 p.m. nightly for schizophrenia. R1's medication order, dated 6/9/22, indicated R1 received desmopressin acetate 0.2 mg by mouth at 8:00 p.m. nightly for urinary incontinence. R2's MDS admission assessment, dated 2/5/24, indicated R2 admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure episodes of leaving the building unsupervised were evaluated or assessed to determine what, if any, additional supervision or monitoring was needed to help prevent subsequent exits from the building for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for elopement and whom had cognitive impairment. R1 left the care center without staff knowledge was found outside in an adjacent alleyway.Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R1 had moderate cognitive impairment but demonstrated no delusional thinking. The MDS outlined R1 demonstrated no wandering behaviors, however, did have dementia and Alzheimer's Disease. Further, the MDS recorded R1 as being independent with most mobility tasks (i.e., walking, transferring). R1's Wander Risk Assessment, dated 3/6/25, identified R1 had been in the care center for less than 30 days, was un-familiar with the surrounding area(s), and had both short and long-term memory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure food items were properly stored, labeled, and dated to reduce the risk of physical cross-contamination and potential foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents, staff, and visitors who consumed food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 3/17/25 at 12:11 p.m., an initial kitchen tour was completed with dietary aid (DA)-A. In the walking refrigerator a sheet pan cart with several unwrapped and undated trays contained the following items: * Three trays with about 20 cheese and eggs English muffin sandwiches with a piece of parchment paper on top * Two trays with tater tots with a piece of parchment paper on top * Two trays with apple bran bowls, each containing about 35 bowls with a piece of parchment paper on top. * One tray of mint and chocolate dessert with a piece of parchment paper on top * In the bottom of the cart there were two trays of breaded pieces of chicken, with no parchment paper on top. During interview on 3/17/25 DA-A verified the unwrapped and undated trays…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 5 of 5 residents (R9) reviewed for restraints, (R26) reviewed for dialysis and Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), and (R27, R53) reviewed for falls. Findings include: The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, dated October 2024, directed staff under section J to identify whether a resident had any falls since admission, entry or reentry or prior Assessment (OBRA or Scheduled PPS), whichever was more recent. If a resident fell, the RAI directed staff to continue to J1900, number of falls since admission/entry or reentry or prior assessment (OBRA or Scheduled PPS). The RAI further defined prior assessment as the most recent minimum data set (MDS) assessment that reported on falls. J1900 directed staff to code either none, one, or two or more falls in three separate boxes that included: 1. No Injury, defined as no evidence of injury was noted on physical assessment by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure grievances were acted upon and if needed investigated or resolved for 1 of 1 residents (R46) reviewed for grievances. Findings include: R46's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated it was very important to choose what clothes to wear, take care of personal belongings. R46's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, did not have inattention, disorganized thinking, or an altered level of consciousness, did not have hallucinations or delusions, behaviors, and did not reject cares. R46's progress notes were reviewed from 8/7/2023, and lacked information R46 was missing clothing items. R46's progress notes dated 10/4/23, indicated R46 reported missing money and a vulnerable adult report and online police report were completed. R46's care plan dated 2/4/25, indicated R46 had intact cognition. During interview on 3/17/25 at 3:52 p.m., R46 stated when he first came, his clothes were missing and never got them…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were in place for 1 of 1 resident (R46) who self catheterized. Findings include: R46's Optional State Assessment (OSA) dated 2/7/25, indicated intact cognition, did not have hallucinations, delusions, or behaviors, and did not reject cares. The OSA further indicated R46 was independent with activities of daily living (ADLs), was not on a urinary or bowel toileting program. R46's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R46 did not have an indwelling catheter, external catheter, ostomy, or had intermittent catheterizations and was always continent of bowel and bladder. R46's Medical Diagnosis form indicated R46 had the following diagnoses: fusion of the spine, lumbar region, and an unspecified disorder of the prostate. R46's Orders form was reviewed and lacked physician orders on how R46 self catheterized, why R46 self catheterized, what type of catheter was used, how often catheterization was required, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and document review, the facility failed to ensure interventions for safe smoking were implemented for 1 of 2 residents (R6) reviewed for smoking. Findings include: R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, did not have range of motion impairment to upper extremities, did not have physical or verbal behaviors directed towards others, and did not reject care. R6's Medical Diagnoses form indicated the following diagnoses: tobacco use, and mild intellectual disabilities, and schizophrenia. R6's Orders form was reviewed and lacked information regarding safe smoking. R6's care plan dated 12/26/24, indicated R6 had moderate cataracts and a surgical consult was provided, however R6 declined treatment, interventions included staff to observe for visual changes or ability to maneuver safely in the environment. R6's care plan dated 12/26/24, indicated R6 heard voices and had paranoid accusations others wanted R6's money or were in her business. R6's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of one resident (R1) when reviewed for care plans. R1 did not have adequate interventions in place after a history of eloping/wandering from the facility. Findings include: R1's admission Record printed on 6/17/24 indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Record stated R1's medical diagnosis included schizoaffective disorder. R1's minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R1 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated R1 was cognitively intact. R1's care plan dated 2/14/24 indicated R1 has command voices that are loud, whispers that can be intense that tell him things to do and if he is decompensating, he will act on those commands. Interventions indicated staff to ask questions to bring R1 back to reality such as 1. Are you having whispers, intense, or screaming voices? And 2. What are the voices telling you? The intervention indicated to remind R1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-03 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to conduct ongoing quality assessment and assurance activities, develop, and implement appropriate plans of action to correct repeated quality deficiencies identified during the survey the facility was aware of or should have been aware of which had the potential to adversely affect all 60 residents which resided in the facility. Findings include: The facility's QAPI meeting minutes for the past 12 months were requested, however not received. Documentation and evidence of the facility's ongoing performance improvement projects (PIPs) was requested, however not received. Documentation and evidence of a recent performance improvement plan (PIP) was requested, however was not received. When interviewed on 5/2/24 at 5:10 p.m., the administrator stated the facility held quarterly QAPI meetings but due to being interim, he was unable to access the shared network where he believed the previous administrator saved the previous meeting minutes. The administrator stated the facility was also involved in PIPs but was unable to locate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-03 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee that was effective in identifying and responding to quality deficiencies, and developing procedures for feedback, data collection and monitoring systems. In addition, the facility failed to provide evidence of a Performance Improvement Project (PIP) which focused on high risk or problem-prone areas. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 60 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: Quality tracking data was requested from the facility but was not provided. During interview on 5/7/24 at 7:24 p.m., the administrator stated, I think the last administrator had meetings, but was unsure where the meeting minutes were located. The administrator also stated he believed the facility had a PIP but was unable to locate any information regarding the project. A facility policy titled QAPI Plan - 2024 dated 4/2024, indicated the facility implement PIPs to improve processes, systems, outcomes, and satisfaction. The QAPI plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess residents' eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccination according to The Centers of Disease and Control and Prevention (CDC) for 2 of 5 (R360, R26) reviewed for vaccinations. Findings include: The CDC identified on the Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults Chart, dated 3/15/23, Adults 19-[AGE] years old with chronic health conditions, such as diabetes mellitus, who received PCV13 (pneumococcal conjugate vaccine) should receive either one dose of PCV20 or one dose of PPSV23 (pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine). The dose of PCV20 or PPSV23 should be administered at least one year after PCV13. Adults 19-[AGE] years old with chronic health conditions, such as diabetes mellitus, who received PPSV23 should receive either one dose of PCV15 or PCV20 at least one year after the most recent PPSV23 vaccination. R360's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R360 was [AGE] years old, had intact cognition and diagnosis of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 20 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident call light cord was within reach from the shower floor for 1 of 1 multi-resident (R39, R14, R25, R32) bathroom reviewed for call light accessibility. Findings include: R39's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition, had hallucinations and delusions and no refusals of care. R39 was independent with activities of daily living (ADLs) but needed substantial and/or maximal assistance with showers/bathing. R39 had diagnoses which included schizophrenia and cataracts. R39's care plan printed 5/3/24, identified R39 was a low fall risk and directed staff to educate and remind R39 to use the call light and call for staff when weak. R14's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified R14 had short- and long-term memory problems and made moderately impaired decisions regarding tasks of daily life. R14 had hallucinations, delusions, inattention, disorganized thinking, and no rejections of care. R14 was independent with all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a multi-resident bathroom ceiling vent fan was cleaned for 4 of 4 residents (R39, R14, R25, R32) reviewed for cleanliness of environment. Findings include: During observation on 4/29/24 at 12:24 p.m., grayish white colored dust thickly covered 50 to 75% of a bathroom ceiling vent. The ceiling vent fan ran but no air flow felt. During interview on 5/1/24 at 9:16 a.m., the administrator (admin) expected maintenance and housekeeping to keep vents and fans clean as often as necessary. Admin stated usually maintenance cleaned high vents and fans, and housekeeping cleaned lower vents and fans. The facility recently changed housekeeping from in-house to a contracted company, so a cleaning schedule was being developed. During interview on 5/1/24 at 9:22 a.m., the assistant director of maintenance (M)-B stated they cleaned vents and fans when dust was observed or when residents came and told them. M-B stated they tried to check rooms twice a month but sometimes didn't happen. M-B stated they had a log for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify the medical provider of on-going medication refusals for 1 of 1 resident (R14) reviewed for notification of change. Findings include: R14's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], identified R14 had short- and long-term memory problems and made moderately impaired decisions regarding tasks of daily life. R14 had hallucinations, delusions, inattention, disorganized thinking, and no rejections of care. R14 was independent with all ADLs. R14 had diagnoses of diabetes mellitus and schizophrenia. R14's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 11/3/23, dlirium triggered for inattention and disorganized thinking. The CAA identified the symptoms were not new and had abnormal blood sugar levels due to R14's refusal to take insulin. The CAA cognitive loss triggered due to refusal of cognitive assessment and staff indicating short and long-term memory loss, poor decision making, inattention, and disorganized thinking. The CAA indicated R14 received frequent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 residents (R47 and R 53)'s grievances were documented, responded to and resolved in a timely manner. Findings include: R47's 2/23/24 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identified his cognition was intact, and he had behaviors which included hallucinations, delusions, and verbal behavior directed toward others. He had diagnoses which included Schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, dependent personality disorder, and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). R47 was independent with activities of daily living (ADLs), but needed redirection and cueing to correct daily routines. R47's current undated care plan identified target behaviors of hallucinations, thought blocking delusions, paranoia and disorganized thinking. Interventions included validation when he expressed delusional content, Associated Clinic of psychology (ACP) services weekly and as needed (PRN), 1:1 visits to allow R47 to vent his feelings. Medications as ordered, with monitoring for side effects and effectiveness. Observation/interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of potential abuse were reported to the administrator and State Agency (SA) immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, for 1 of 1 residents (R45) reviewed for resident-to-resident verbal altercation. Findings include: R28's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated moderate impairment with tasks of daily life, fluctuating inattention behaviors, continuous disorganized thinking, and no altered level consciousness. R28's MDS indicated he was usually able to make himself understood and was able to understand others. MDS indicated R28 experienced hallucinations and delusions and displayed verbal behaviors directed towards others in addition to other behavioral symptoms not directed towards others. MDS indicated R28 did not have physical behavioral symptoms director towards others. R28's diagnoses included schizophrenia and anxiety. R28's Care Area Assessment (CAA) for communication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of resident-to-resident verbal abuse were thoroughly investigated, and protection provided for 1 of 1 residents (R45) who were involved in a resident-to-resident verbal altercation by R28. Findings include: R28's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated moderate impairment with tasks of daily life, fluctuating inattention behaviors, continuous disorganized thinking, and no altered level consciousness. R28's MDS indicated he was usually able to make himself understood and was able to understand others. MDS indicated R28 experienced hallucinations and delusions and displayed verbal behaviors directed towards others in addition to other behavioral symptoms not directed towards others. MDS indicated R28 did not have physical behavioral symptoms director towards others. R28's diagnoses included schizophrenia and anxiety. R28's Care Area Assessment (CAA) for communication dated 7/7/23, indicated R28 had loose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurately coded to reflect a resident's diagnosis of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (a mental health condition triggered by a traumatic event) for 2 of 2 residents (R57, R14) reviewed for MDS accuracy. Findings include: The resident assessment instrument (RAI) manual version 3.0 indicated under section I, Active Diagnoses, the items in this section were intended to code diseases that have a direct relationship to the resident's current functional status, cognitive status, mood or behavior status, medical treatments, nursing monitoring, or risk of death. One of the important functions of the MDS assessment is to generate an updated, accurate picture of the resident's current health status. Section I in the RAI manual further indicated definitions of active diagnoses were physician documented diagnoses in the last 60 days that have a direct relationship to the resident's current functional status, cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for psychotropic medications for 1 of 5 residents (R56) reviewed for psychotropic medications. Findings include: R56's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R56 had intact cognition and experienced hallucinations. MDS indicated R56 had diagnoses of diabetes, depression, and a psychotic disorder other than schizophrenia. MDS indicated R56 received an antipsychotic on a routine basis and an antidepressant medication. R56's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 2/14/24, for psychotropic drug use indicated R56 had mental illness diagnoses and was being treated with long-term psychotropic medications. The CAA further indicated staff would follow the plan of care to maintain R56's current level of functioning for improvement with symptom relief. R56's physician orders included the following: - Olanzapine (Zyprexa) oral tablet 7.5 milligrams (mg), Give 1 tablet orally at bedtime to treat psychotic depressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate interventions, as a result of multiple falls and comorbidities contributing to the risk of additional falls, were identified and implemented for 1 of 2 residents (R2) reviewed for accidents, hazards and supervision. Findings include: R2's Face Sheet form indicated the following diagnoses: paranoid schizophrenia, end stage renal disease, hypokalemia (low potassium), bilateral myopia (difficulty in focusing on objects that are far away), presbyopia (the loss of your eyes ability to focus on nearby objects), hypertension, and osteoarthritis. R2's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, had hallucinations and delusions, did not reject care, had a cane or crutch and a walker, did not have impairment in range of motion, was independent with activities of daily living (ADLs), was occasionally incontinent of bladder, had two or more falls without injury since the previous assessment, took…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess for and identify potential triggers to avoid re-traumatization for 2 of 2 residents (R57, R14) who had a history of trauma. Findings include: R57's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, had moderate depression symptoms, sometimes socially isolated, had verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others, and other behavioral symptoms not directed at others such as physical symptoms such as hitting or scratching self, pacing, rummaging, public sexual acts, disrobing in public, throwing or smearing food or bodily wastes, or verbal/vocal symptoms like screaming, disruptive sounds 1 to 3 days of the previous 7 days. The MDS indicated R57 had delusions and further, rejected care, was independent with most activities of daily living (ADLs) had bipolar disorder, and manic depression. R57's Medical Diagnosis form dated 1/5/24, indicated R57 had post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (a mental health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was adequate monitoring and provider notification for insulin parameters for 1 of 3 resident (R56) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R56's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R56 had intact cognition, experienced hallucinations, had no delusions, exhibited no physical or verbal behaviors, and had no rejection of cares. The MDS also indicated R56 had diagnoses of type 2 diabetes, depression, and schizoaffective disorder (a disorder characterized by a combination of symptoms of schizophrenia, like hallucinations and delusions, and a mood disorder, like depression). R56's Care Area Assessment (CAA) for self-care and mobility dated 2/14/24, indicated he was able to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) independently but required some cues and reminders as he could loose focus related to having active false fixed perceptions that required staff supervision to ensure follow through. R56's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders and manufacturer guidelines for 3 of 5 residents (R260, R46, R10) observed to receive medication. A total of (3) errors out of 25 opportunities were identified resulting in a 12% (percent) facility error rate. Findings include: R260's physician orders dated [DATE], included the following order: • mucus relief oral tablet extended release 12 hour 600 milligram (MG) (guaifenesin) give 600 mg by mouth two times a day for RSV, respiratory distress related to acute respiratory distress syndrome. There was no stop date on the order. During interview and observation on [DATE] from 7:20 a.m., to 7:32 a.m., registered nurse (RN)-A stated she would be helping to administer medications until the trained medication aide (TMA) arrived. At 7:20 a.m., RN-A prepared R260's medications, except for the mucus relief and stated she did not see the medication for mucus relief. At 7:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to accommodate dietary preferences for 1 of 1 resident (R57) reviewed for food. Findings include: The facility form, Alternate Meal Choices, available seven days a week, indicated if a resident did not like a meal on the menu, a request for an alternate meal: peanut butter and jelly sandwich, grilled cheese sandwich, meat and cheese sandwich, and chef salad could be submitted. The facility Week 4 at a Glance menu dated 4/28/24, through 5/4/24 indicated the following food items: • 4/28/24: the breakfast items indicated choice of cereal, egg bake, sweet roll, milk; the noon meal indicated fried chicken mashed potatoes, chicken gravy, cascade veggies, pie, and milk. The alternate food item was country fried steak and gravy. The evening meal indicated corn dogs, macaroni and cheese, baked beans, seasonal fresh fruit and milk and the alternate was taco salad. • 4/29/24: the breakfast items indicated choice of cereal, fried eggs, toast,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-22 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility's current administration failed to ensure proper oversight for the facility's financial operations. This practice resulted in resident personal funds accounts being unaccounted for. This had the potential to affect all 58 residents who resided in the facility at the time of the survey. Findings include: The facility computerized Trust Transaction History dated 3/21/24, indicated a balance of $74,000.06 in the residents' trust fund bank account. The First Bank and Trust Savings Account statement dated 3/21/24, indicated a balance of $56,359.21. The First Bank and Trust Checking Account statement dated 3/21/24, indicated a balance of $900.72. According to all calculations, the computerized Trust Transaction History indicated a $74,000.06 balance in the resident's personal funds accounts. The First bank and Trusts savings and checking accounts totaled $57,259.93. The current amount of cash within the safe and cash box at the facility was $3,266.35., indicating a discrepancy of $13,473.78 which was unaccounted for. On 3/21/24 at 12:52…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-22 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 53 of 58 residents with personal funds accounts (including R5, R6, R8, R11 and R12) deposited with the facility, had access to the personal funds after hours and on weekends. Findings include: R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R5 was cognitively intact. On 3/21/24 at 8:41 a.m., R5 stated he could only get money out of his account twice a month. R6's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R6 was cognitively intact. On 3/21/24 at 8:44 a.m., R6 stated he could only pull money out of his account Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 10:00 a.m. R6 stated if the banking office was closed, he couldn't get his money. R8's admission MDS dated [DATE], indicated R8 was cognitively intact. On 3/21/24 at 8:54 a.m., R8 stated he would be able to take money from his account during banking hours from 8:00 a.m. until 10:00 a.m. but not after that time frame. R11's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R11 was cognitively intact.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-22 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to reconcile resident personal fund accounts for 53 of 58 residents (including R5, R6, R8, R11, and R12). In addition, the facility failed to provide quarterly statements for resident personal fund accounts for 53 of 58 residents reviewed for personal fund accounts. Findings include: R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R5 was cognitively intact. On 3/21/24 at 8:41 a.m., R5 stated he had not received a quarterly statement for his personal fund account. R6's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R6 was cognitively intact. On 3/21/24 at 8:44 a.m., R6 stated he had not received a quarterly statement for his personal fund account. R8's admission MDS dated [DATE], indicated R8 was cognitively intact. On 3/21/24 at 8:54 a.m., R8 stated he had not received a quarterly statement for his personal fund account. R11's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R11 was cognitively intact. On 3/21/24 at 9:04 a.m., R11 stated he he had not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent elopement, failed to follow safety plan for leaving the premises, and failed to timely report missing person in accordance with care plan and facility policy for 1 of 1 resident (R1) who had a history of multiple elopements related to audible hallucinations. Findings include: During interview on 3/13/24 at 2:20 p.m., R1 stated he enjoyed being able to leave the facility to take walks, use public transportation, go to restaurants, and visiting with his mother. He managed his own money and had a bus card. R1 recalled running away from the facility this week and was not planning on coming back. R1 explained there was two ways he would leave the facility and indicated it was dependent on the voices he heard in his head. The first way was taking his phone, going to the nurses station to sign out, and get his GPS tracker. The other way was when the voices gave him the desire to escape or the need to runaway.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate services and treatment that included medication management and monitoring and failed to ensure coordination of care between mental health care providers to ensure the highest level of mental and psychosocial well being for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who had a diagnosis of schizophrenia with audible hallucinations and a court order for medication management to control symptoms of psychosis. Findings include: R1's court document dated 5/5/22 identified R1 does not have the ability to understand and use information about his mental illness, its symptoms, and treatment. Neuroleptic medications are currently prescribed for respondent (R1) by his treatment provider. They are prescribed to relieve his psychotic symptoms, including command hallucinations and paranoia. The documents included a [NAME] order (court order that gives the court the power to order administration of medication for committed person who is unwilling to take prescribed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-03-20 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, failed to ensure the posted nurse staffing information included the daily census. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the posted nurse staffing information reflected accurate total number and actual hours worked per shift for licensed and registered staff for each shift on a daily basis. This had potential to affect all 56 residents or visitors who wished to review the information. Findings include: During observation on 3/18/25 at 9:48 a.m., the posted nurse staffing information was hung above the main reception area and lacked the facility's daily census. The facility's posted nurse staffing information dated 2/17/25 - 3/18/25 were reviewed on 3/20/25 at 8:19 a.m. and indicated no registered nurse (RN) hours worked for day, evening or night shift on the following dates: 3/8/25, 3/9/25, 3/13/25, and 3/16/25. Additionally, the posted nurse staffing information lacked daily census on all reviewed dates. The facility's staffing schedule dated 2/17/25 - 3/18/25 was reviewed on 3/20/25 at 8:19 a.m., and indicated there was RN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-05-03 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, the facility failed to ensure mail was delivered to residents on Saturdays. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility who received personal mail, including but not limited to 2 of 2 residents (R4, R17) who verbally confirmed mail was not received on Saturdays. Finding include: Resident Council was held on 5/2/25 at 3:00 p.m., with R4 and R17 in attendance. When asked whether residents received their mail on Saturdays, R4 and R17 voiced mail that came on the weekend was not delivered until Monday when the medical records staff person returned to work. Interview on 5/2/24 at 8:51 a.m., with the medical records staff person reported mail was delivered to the facility six days per week including Saturdays, and she was responsible for delivery to the residents. She reported she did not work on the weekends and mail recieved on weekends was not delivered until Monday when she returned to work. Interview on 5/2/24 at 10:30 a.m. with the interim administrator reported his expectation for mail to be delivered six days per week. He reported he was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in MN
CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 24E166. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.