Bywood East Health Care
3427 Central Avenue Northeast, Minneapolis, MN 55418 · For profit - Corporation · 96 certified beds · (612) 788-9757 Medicaid only — no Medicare
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568)
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (77) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.5% | 18.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.6% | 4.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 1.9% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.9% | 4.1% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.1% | 4.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.4% | 20.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.2% | 12.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.0% | 5.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.1% | 24.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 32.1% | 17.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.00 | 1.61 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.37 | 1.90 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 65.5 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.45 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.60 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
77 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 60 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-12-15 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to provide a resident's prescribed therapeutic diet when on 11/17/25, a registered nurse (RN)-A assisted R3 to purchase a sticky bun from the vending machine at the facility because he was unable to do so himself for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for food and drink. While eating the sticky bun R3 started to choke and went unresponsive, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was started and R3 was transferred to the hospital where he subsequently died on [DATE].The immediate jeopardy began on 11/17/25 when RN-A purchased a non-pureed item out of a vending machine for R3, R3 choked on the item resulting in his death was identified on 11/17/25. The chief financial officer (CFO)-A, a director of nursing (DON) was notified of the immediate jeopardy at 3:19 p.m. on 12/15/25. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 12/4/25, and the deficient practice corrected on 12/4/25, prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past Noncompliance. Findings include: R3's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure residents were protected from resident-to-resident abuse for 2 of 2 residents (R3 and R4) who were in a verbal and physical altercation which resulted a thoracic (T9) fracture with facial injuries for R4 and a swollen, bruised hand for R3. This resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for both R3 and R4.The IJ began on 8/14/25 at 10:45 p.m., when R3 and R4 had a verbal altercation, were separated by staff with one verbal redirection towards R3, but no other behavioral interventions were implemented despite a significant history of physical altercations for both residents, leading to R3 seeking R4 out again, re-engaging in the verbal altercation before starting a physical altercation which resulted in R4 needing emergency medical treatment for facial lacerations and a T9 fracture. The director of Nursing (DON) and quality assurance nurse (QA) were notified of the IJ at 3:45 p.m. on 8/22/25. The IJ was removed at 4:25 p.m. on 8/26/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, intervention and document review the facility failed to ensure a safe environment and prevent fire hazards for 2 of 2 residents (R5 and R6) when residents were found to be smoking in resident rooms with staff awareness. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R5 and R6 and could lead to serious harm for all residents, staff, and visitors at the facility. The IJ began on [DATE] at. 4:54 p.m., when a strong smell of cigarette smoke was noted on the third floor near the elevator and trained medication aide (TMA)-A and TMA-B stated the odor was coming from room [ROOM NUMBER] (R6's room). R5 was observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] and was asked to leave by staff. During interview, R5 stated he was in the room and had just been smoking. The nightstand next to bed two was observed to be covered in cigarette ashes and there were multiple cigarettes burns on the floor. The window was also wide open in the room. TMA-A indicated staff often smelled smoke when R5 was in the room. Interview with R6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were completed and interventions implemented for 1 of 1 residents (R1) who was assessed to be unsafe in the community and at risk of elopement. This failure resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) when on R1 left the facility without supervision for appointments, got lost, and was gone for over 5 hours before staff were aware. R1 was found 7 hours later by family member (FM)-A. The IJ began on 9/18/24, at 1:15 p.m. when R1 was sent to his 2:00 p.m. appointment without an escort and subsequently missed a 3:00 p.m. appointment when he became lost. R1 was later found by his family member (FM)-A outside of a highly trafficked area hospital at 10:00 p.m. director of nursing (DON) and administrator were notified of the IJ on 10/10/24, at 12:52 p.m. The facility had implemented corrective action prior to the start of the survey, therefore the deficiency is being issued at past-non-compliance. Findings include: In a Wandering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess to determine cause of falls and implement interventions to prevent further falls for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R5, R6) reviewed for falls. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R1 when he had a fall that resulted in a diagnoses of traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness and subarachnoid hemorrhage, brain bleed (bleeding in the space between the brain and the tissue covering the brain). R1 remained hospitalized . The IJ began on 8/13/24 at 1:30 a.m., when R1 had a second unwitnessed fall and hit his head. R1 was sent to the hospital and was diagnosed with a subarachnoid hemorrhage. R1 had another unwitnessed fall on 8/18/24 at 12:45 p.m., and returned to the hospital. The administrator and director of nursing were notified of the IJ on 9/5/24 at 4:34 p.m. The IJ was removed on 9/6/24 at 4:01 p.m., but noncompliance remained at the lower scope and severity of a D, which indicated no actual harm with potential for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and develop or implement interventions to reduce the risk of ongoing potential physical and/or mental abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for resident-to-resident abuse allegations. R1 was repeatedly harassed and physically grabbed by another resident (R2) which contributed to ongoing emotional distress and hospitalization resulting in psychosocial harm.Findings include:R2's progress notes, dated 8/1/25 to 12/19/25, identified over 20 recorded entries of R2 having behaviors with a note reading, Was behavior observed? YES. However, the notes lacked any additional information on what the behavior was, nor what interventions were done to reduce it. R2's progress note dated 9/5/25, indicated R2 was recorded as being physically and verbally aggressive towards another resident. The note recorded R2 rolled her wheelchair over another resident's foot and needed to be re-directed several times. The note did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-11-21 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide trauma informed care including failure to complete a comprehensive assessment that identified triggers in order to eliminate or mitigate the risk of re-traumatization for 1 of 1 resident (R2) who had a known history of trauma prior to admission. The facility's failures resulted in actual psychosocial harm for R2 when R2 was involved in two resident to resident abuse incidents that caused R2 ongoing fear and aggressive reactions that were uncharacteristic of R2. Findings includeR2's hospital functional assessment dated [DATE] indicated R2 reported significant history of trauma including abuse which have led to intrusive memories/thoughts, nightmares, dissociative reactions, and significant psychological stress.R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R2 did not have cognitive impairment, did not have behaviors, and was independent with activities of daily living (ADL). R2 had diagnoses that included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control while providing laundry services as well as failed to review the facility Infection Prevention Program policy annually. These deficient practices had the ability to affect all residents who resided in the facility.Findings include:Laundry:During a laundry room tour and interview on 5/6/26 at 8:10 a.m., other staff (O)-E stated they put a personal T-shirt on over their clothes when handling dirty laundry and used the same T-shirt when hanging clean laundry. O-E stated they used disposable gowns when handling laundry of a resident with an infection. They stated they had no concerns wearing the same clothing for clean and dirty laundry if the resident did not have an infection.During an interview on 5/7/26 at 12:40 p.m., the director of maintenance (M)-A stated that they work with an external company for on-site laundry and housekeeping services. M-A stated they thought laundry staff wore gloves and a gown when handling dirty laundry, but they were not concerned if no gown…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to have the appropriate funds available for 2 of 3 (R41, R21) Medicare/Medicaid residents who wanted to withdraw funds outside of scheduled withdrawal hours set up by the facility. In addition, insignificant funds were available on the evening shift for any residents. This had the potential to affect all residents who kept funds with the facility. Findings include:R41's comprehensive MDS dated [DATE], identified R41 was cognitively intact.During an interview on 5/4/26 at 1:20 p.m., R41 stated they could get five dollars out on the weekends by going to the nurse's station. R41 stated Monday through Friday they could take their money out from 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m R41 stated if you missed the time the business window was open you could not get your money.R21's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R21 was cognitively intact.During an interview on 5/4/26 at 1:25 p.m., R21 stated the facility kept money for him and he could access…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment for 7 of 7 residents (R24, R33, R62, R9, R56, R12, R20) reviewed for environment. Findings include:R24R24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R24 had diagnoses which included schizophrenia and depression. In addition, R24's MDS identified she was moderately cognitively intact.R24's care plan dated 1/12/26, identified R24 had significant mental health issues. Interventions included to encourage her to not have food in her room, staff were to tell her keeping food out of her room would help keep the mice out of the traps as she identified the mice as her friends.During an interview on 5/7/26 at 9:08 a.m., the infection preventionist (IP) stated they were aware that R24 was trying to feed the mice. The IP stated they would try to get her to eat in the day room and on every shift, staff were supposed to look for food in her room. In addition, housekeeping staff were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure bait stations were monitored and serviced to prevent/reduce pest problems for 6 of 6 residents (R24, R33, R62, R9, R56, R12) reviewed for environment. This had the potential to affect all 64 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include:R24R24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R24 had diagnoses which included schizophrenia and depression. In addition, R24's MDS identified she was moderately cognitively intact.During an interview on 5/7/26 at 9:08 a.m., the infection preventionist (IP) stated they were aware that R24 was trying to feed the mice. The IP stated they would try to get her to eat in the day room and on every shift, staff were supposed to look for food in her room. In addition, housekeeping staff were supposed to be cleaning her room twice a day.During an observation on 5/7/26 at 9:14 a.m., the IP went to the room and looked under the bed. Near the head of the bed on the side facing the inside of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-07 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) level two screening referral was acted upon for 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed for PASARR screening process. Findings include:R2's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified diagnoses of disorganized schizophrenia, dementia with behavioral disturbance, developmental disorder of scholastic skills, and metabolic encephalopathy. R2's care plan dated 4/8/26, didn't identify PASARR level two recommendations.During an interview on 5/7/26 at 2:39 p.m., the director of nursing (DON) confirmed a level two screening was not in R2's electronic medical record. The DON stated it was important so they can identify what services were needed for them. A document, OBRA Level 1 screening dated 4/19/24, identified serious mental illness and referral to level two screening with Hennepin County preadmission screening team (PAS) Team.A policy regarding the PAS process was requested but not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to protect residents from physical abuse by contracted staff for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse.Findings include:R1's diagnoses list dated 2/25/26 included disorganized schizophrenia, dementia, history of traumatic brain injury and mild cognitive impairment.R1's annual Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated R1 was rarely understood and had moderately impaired cognition.R1's care plan dated 1/14/26 included a focus of potential for abuse neglect and/or exploitation related to vulnerable adult status with a goal of [R1] will not be abused. Interventions included but are not limited to staff will follow Vulnerable Adult (VA) policy to keep resident free from exploitation, abuse and/or neglect.R1's general condition note dated 2/11/26 indicated R1 was hit at 2:00 p.m. by an external vendor. R1 had slight redness to his left cheek.During an observation and interview on 2/25/2026 at 1:03 p.m., R1 was observed sitting in a wheelchair…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement written policies to prohibit and prevent abuse from contracted staff and failed to include protocols for providing abuse prohibition education or verification of abuse education for contracted staff. This had the potential to affect all current and future residents residing in the facility.Findings include:On 2/25/2026 at 2:49 p.m. video footage from 2/11/26 at approximately 2:00 p.m. was reviewed in the presence of assistant director of nursing (ADON). The video revealed R1 was sitting in a wheelchair by the elevator doors. Several other residents and staff members were in the area. A tall male (identified by director of nursing (DON) as a contracted laboratory technician (LT-A)) walked up to the elevator and used his hand to motion to R1 to move back away from the closed elevator door. LT-A's mouth was seen moving and his right arm was swinging up and down. LT-A stepped forward and slapped R1's face with his open right hand. R1 lifted his arms as assistant director of nursing (ADON) intervened. At the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident-to-resident physical altercation which contributed to feelings of fear and mental anguish was reported to the State agency (SA) immediately, but not later than two hours after the allegation is made of abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed reporting. R1 was grabbed and had her hair pulled by R2 which caused R1 psychosocial harm. Findings include: R2's progress note, dated 9/9/25, identified R2 called out for her roommate and various other names aloud. The note recorded, She also comes up behind [R1] and attempts to pull her hair. The note included a section labeled, Immediate Intervention(s), which outlined that each time the behaviors are observed, R2 was redirected. However, the redirection is not successful adding, She acts as if she did not understand the words spoken to her . R2's progress note, dated 12/7/25, recorded her as having multiple behaviors which included, . pulling on the hair and dress of [R1] as she passes her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to prevent and protect 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, and R3) from physical and verbal abuse when staff failed to remove R2 and bystanders after R1 demonstrated aggression toward R2 which led to physical altercation between R1, R2, and R3. In addition, facility failed to comprehensively assess for triggering behavior patterns and implement interventions that could decrease the risk and/or prevent for recurrent incidences of resident-to-resident abuse. Findings include:R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, depression, and psychoactive substance abuse. R1 was independent with all activities of daily living (ADL). R1 had verbal behavioral symptoms directed at others 1-3 days and rejection of care 4-6 days during the assessment period.R1's care plan dated 8/28/25 indicated R1 had potential for behavior concerns related to verbal and physical aggression towards…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed in a thorough and timely manner to reflect actual resident' status and ensure appropriate care-planning for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for MDS accuracy.Findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, dated 10/2023, identified the RAI was used to help identify problems for a resident and address them using an individualized care plan. The manual outlined a section labeled, SECTION C: COGNITIVE PATTERNS, which directed the section would be used to help determine the resident's attention, orientation and ability to register or recall information adding, These items are crucial factors in many care-planning decisions; with provided methods and instructions to ensure accurate, thorough coding of the MDS. Further, the manual included another section labeled, SECTION D: MOOD, which outlined the section…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 60 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of sexual abuse to the state agency (SA) for 1 of 1 resident (R1, R2) when R2 was found engaged in a sexual act with R1 without staff's knowledge of R2's consent. Findings include: R2's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 was cognitive impaired. R2's Care Plan dated 8/19/25, indicated R2 had potential for abuse, neglect and/or exploitation related to vulnerable adult status. R1's admission MDS dated [DATE], indicated R1 was cognitively intact. A Facility Reported Incident (FRI) dated 8/14/25 at 1:40 p.m., indicated on 8/13/25 at 7:31 p.m., writer received a call that R2 and R1 were found to be engaging in a sexual act. Writer was told R1 offered R2 a cigarette in exchange for sex. This morning at approximately 11:30 a.m. writer went to go speak with resident (R2) and she stated nothing happed and she was okay and had no memory of the incident, she was her normal routine, had a BIMs of 5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a resident-to-resident abuse allegation for 2 of 2 residents (R3 and R4) and a resident-to-resident sexual assault allegation for 2 of 2 residents (R1, R2) to determine incident details, interview all parties involved, appropriately assess and identify interventions to reduce likelihood of future abuse. Findings include: R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R3 had bipolar disorder, alcohol dependance, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and was cognitively intact. R4's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R4 was cognitively intact with disorganized thinking and had no behaviors. A Facility Reported Incident dated 8/14/25 at 10:45 p.m., indicated R3 and R4 engaged in a verbal altercation on the smoking patio. Staff were able to separate them and R3 went back into the building to his room on the third floor. Several minutes later R3 returned to the smoking patio and R4 was seen on the ground where R3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, document review and interview, the facility failed to comprehensively develop and implement a resident centered care plan for 1 of 1 resident (R2) who was at risk of abuse and interventions were not identified to address the root cause of that risk and decrease the likelihood of abuse re-occurring. Findings include: R2's Care Plan dated 8/19/25, indicated R2 was admitted on [DATE], had Alzheimer's Disease with early onset, nicotine dependance, and verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others. R2's Progress Notes admission date (7/21/25) to 8/20/25, indicated:-7/22/25, out of bed multiples times asking for cigarettes-7/23/25, she was up and out with her cigarettes-7/24/25, R2 comes to writer to get cigarettes, explanation given that she only receives one once an hour, she often comes early. -7/24/25, R2 asks for cigarettes but gets one each hour.-7/25/25. Resident in and out of room requesting cigarette before one hour completion.-7/26/25, Resident is constantly asking for cigarette…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure laundry was handled and transported in a way to prevent the spread of infection to the extent possible. This had the possible to affect all 70 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: During interview and observation on 4/15/25 at 8:06 a.m., the head of maintenance (HOM) stated an outside company laundered the facility's linens and the facility washed the resident personal laundry. The laundry room did not have gowns hanging for use and the HOM confirmed staff did not wear gowns, only gloves and a mask, when handling resident dirty laundry. The facility's linens were brought up to the floors for resident use in large, uncovered bins. Personal laundry was brought up to the floors in uncovered, metal hanging carts. The HOM confirmed clean laundry was not covered when brought up to the floors. On 4/14/25 at 1:24 p.m., the second floor unit was toured and room [ROOM NUMBER] (unoccupied) was found with an open door to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure food was reheated to an appropriate temperature to reduce the risk of foodborne illness for 12 residents who ingested the food item. Findings include: Captain Ken's Bag Heating Protocol, indicated the chicken pot pie filling was to reach a temperature of 165 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The Facility's temperature log dated 4/14/25 through 4/20/25, indicated the temperature of the chicken and dumplings was 170 F on 4/16/25 for the lunch service. During an observation on 4/16/25 at 10:43 a.m., cook (C)-A took out multiple bags of chicken pot pie filling (confirmed in a later interview) from the steam cooker, cut the tops off the bags, and mixed the item into a large metal container. C-A was not observed to take the temperature of the item. During an observation and interview on 4/16/25 at 10:45 a.m., as C-A was observed to continue prepping food for the lunch meal service, temperature logs were found and indicated the chicken and dumplings temperature was taken at 170 degrees. C-A was observed to take the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure voiced allegations of potential verbal and/or mental abuse were reported to the administrator and State agency (SA) in a timely manner for 3 of 4 residents (R21, R26, R55) reviewed who reported potential allegations of abuse. Findings include: R21 R21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R21 had intact cognition but demonstrated delusional thinking during the review period. On 4/14/25 at 12:51 p.m., R21 was interviewed in their shared room with the doorway partially open at her request. R21's roommate was not present, however, a bed and personal belongings were present on their side of the privacy curtain. R21 stated she felt abused by her roommate and expressed the roommate often called her derogatory names and swore at her. R21 added, [Roommate] calls me a slut, and says, F [expletive] you [to me]. R21 named the roommate by name and expressed they had lived together for at least a couple months. R21 stated she wasn't…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure voiced allegations of potential verbal and/or mental abuse were acted upon, investigated, and if needed, adequate protection provided to ensure safety and well-being for 3 of 4 residents (R21, R26, R55) reviewed who reported potential allegations of abuse. Findings include: R21 R21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R21 had intact cognition but demonstrated delusional thinking during the review period. On 4/14/25 at 12:51 p.m., R21 was interviewed in their shared room with the doorway partially open at her request. R21's roommate was not present, however, a bed and personal belongings were present on their side of the privacy curtain. R21 stated she felt abused by her roommate and expressed the roommate often called her derogatory names and swears at her. R21 added, [Roommate] calls me a slut, and says, F [expletive] you [to me]. R21 named the roommate by name and expressed they had lived together for at least a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurately coded with consumed medications to promote continuity of care and ensure accurate care-planning for 2 of 5 residents (R25, R4) reviewed for MDS accuracy. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, dated 10/2023, identified a purpose to offer clear guidance on how to use (i.e., code) the RAI which was divided in multiple sections. The manual outlined, Section N: Medications, which directed an intent to record the number of days during the review period a type of various medications, including hypoglycemic and antipsychotics, were administered to the resident. The manual outlined consumption of these high-risk medications could have potential for side effects which . can adversely affect health, safety, and quality of life. The manual outlined, N0415 B1. Antianxiety: Check if an anxiolytic medication was taken by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were comprehensive and up to date to ensure continuity of care for 3 of 3 residents (R55, R57 and R65) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Findings include: R55 A CDC Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs) manual, dated 7/2022, identified MDRO transmission within a nursing home was common and contributed to substantial resident morbidity and mortality. The feature outlined Enhanced Barrier Protection (EBP) were defined as, . expand the use of PPE and refer to the use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of MDROs to staff hands and clothing . MDROs may be indirectly transferred from resident-to-resident during these high-contact care activities . residents with wounds and indwelling medical devices are at especially high risk of both acquisition of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide ongoing, comprehensive discharge planning to a lower level of care for 1 of 1 residents (R52) who wished to be discharged from the nursing home. Findings include: R52's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated active discharge planning was occurring for the resident to return to another facility but, a referral had not been made to a Local Contact Agency (LCA) and discharge was expected to be more than three months away. The MDS indicated R52 had intact cognition. R52's care plan revised on 1/8/24, indicated R52 had a discharge plan to move into an assisted living facility. The discharge care plan solely included the following two interventions: discharge criteria would be completed upon admission and reviewed quarterly, annually, and as needed, and nursing would get discharge orders and staff would follow through when discharge was pending. R52's progress note dated 2/15/24 at 2:53 p.m., indicated the outside care coordinator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and develop interventions to promote acceptance with bathing and/or personal hygiene cares for 1 of 2 residents (R24) reviewed who appeared disheveled and had a pattern of refusing cares. Findings include: R24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R24's long-term and short-term memory was impaired. The MDS outlined R24 had both physical and verbal behaviors recorded, however, had no rejection of care behaviors during the review period. Further, the MDS identified R27 needed substantial assistance with bathing, however, was independent with personal hygiene. On 4/14/25 at 12:33 p.m., R24 was observed seated on his bedside while in his room. R24 was dressed in gray-colored sweatpants along with a thick winter coat, and his hair appeared greasy along with him having a visible brown-colored substance over both his hands. R24 stated, I dunno, when asked about it and expressed he was not sure what…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure repeated complaints of pleuritic and/or gastrointestinal distress (i.e., heartburn) were assessed and acted upon to determine what, if any, proactive interventions were needed to promote comfort and prevent complication for 1 of 1 resident (R5) reviewed who complained of heart pain. Findings include: R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R5 had moderate cognitive impairment and several medical conditions including non-traumatic brain dysfunction, heart failure, and schizophrenia. Further, the MDS outlined consumed multiple medications including an anticoagulant (i.e., blood thinner). On 4/14/25 at 2:32 p.m., R5 was observed seated in a chair on the second floor unit. A medication cup was present on the arm of the chair which was approximately 1/2 full of a white colored liquid. R5 was asked by the surveyor if she had any pain to which R5 just repeatedly kept saying aloud, Just my heart. R5 stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure voiced complaints of difficulty hearing were acted upon, assessed, and if needed, treatment started or referred to audiology to promote quality of life for 1 of 1 resident (R24) reviewed who was hard of hearing (HOH). Findings include: R24's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R24's long-term and short-term memory was impaired. Further, the MDS outlined R24's hearing was recorded as, 0. Adequate [no difficulty in normal conversation, social interaction, listening to TV], and R24 did not use hearing aids. R24's care plan, printed 4/15/25, identified R24's actual or potential problems and care needs along with corresponding goals and interventions. The care plan outlined, [R24] has potential/actual alteration in communication related to being hard of hearing and needing hearing aids, with a last revised date recorded, 07/11/2022. The care plan directed to minimize background noise, speak with increased volume…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a resident who had multiple incidents of smoking indoors was reassessed for safe smoking for 1 of 2 residents (R32) reviewed for smoking. Findings include: R32's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R32 was cognitively intact and independent with activities of daily living. R32's most recent smoking assessment, dated 2/27/25, indicated R23 smokes only in designated areas and was deemed a safe smoker. R32's progress notes indicated R32 had at least three incidents of smoking indoors in the past 6-7 months: - On 9/30/24 it was documented R32 violated the facility's smoking policy by smoking in her room. R32 stated she would not smoke in the facility and signed the Smoking Policy. - On 4/9/25 it was documented R32 was caught smoking in her room. R32 was again educated on the risks and consequences of smoking in her room with oxygen being used in the room next to her. - On 4/14/25 it was documented staff informed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a physician visit was completed in a timely manner (i.e., every 60 to 70 days) to promote continuity of care and reduce the risk of disease complication for 1 of 5 residents (R5) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R5 had moderate cognitive impairment and several medical conditions including non-traumatic brain dysfunction, heart failure, and schizophrenia. Further, the MDS outlined consumed multiple medications including antipsychotic and anticoagulant (i.e., blood thinner) medications. On 4/14/25 at 2:32 p.m., R5 was observed seated in a chair on the second floor unit. A medication cup was present on the arm of the chair which was approximately 1/2 full of a white colored liquid. R5 was asked by the surveyor if she had any pain to which R5 just repeatedly kept saying aloud, Just my heart. R5 stated the pain just started that day. At this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented appropriate and manufacturer-directed steps to prevent post-administration complication (i.e., thrush) of a steroid-infused inhaler for 1 of 1 residents (R4) observed to receive inhaled medication during the recertification survey. Findings include: R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R4 had moderate cognitive impairment; along with multiple medical conditions including (history of) pneumonia and asthma. On 4/16/25 at 7:20 a.m., medication set-up and administration was observed with trained medication aide (TMA)-A who removed R4's medications from a mobile cart stationed in the hallway. R4 was seated next to the cart and TMA-A removed two inhalers from the cart to provide to R4. These were handed to the surveyor for review and included a metered-dose inhaler labeled mometasone furoate (Asmanex) HFA 200 mcg/act (micrograms/actuation) with an attached pharmacy label which directed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure consulting pharmacist recommendations for standard-of-care laboratory monitoring with a consumed cardiac glycoside medication were acted upon and addressed in a timely manner for 1 of 5 residents (R5) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R5 had moderate cognitive impairment and several medical conditions including non-traumatic brain dysfunction, heart failure, and schizophrenia. Further, the MDS outlined consumed multiple medications including antipsychotic and anticoagulant (i.e., blood thinner) medications. R5's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 4/2025, identified all of her consumed medications and recorded treatments for the period. The orders included, Digox[in] . 125 MCG [micrograms] . one time a day related to CHRONIC DIASTOLIC (CONGESTIVE) HEART FAILURE, with a listed start date recorded, 03/03/2025. The medication was recorded as being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure consumed cardiac glycoside medication was appropriately monitored in accordance with the standard-of-care laboratory testing to help reduce the risk of medication toxicity for 1 of 5 residents (R5) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: A Cleveland Clinic feature titled, Digoxin, dated 4/2023, identified the medication was used to help with certain heart issues. The feature outlined, Various factors affect how much of the drug your body absorbs and excretes. Digoxin levels that are too high can be life-threatening. The feature outlined the medical provider will check a patient's digoxin level adding, You'll need to have a provider check your digoxin level regularly. They'll tell you how often you need to do this. The medication side effects listed included upset stomach, dizziness, and heart block. Further, the article identified a normal digoxin level range of, 0.5 to 2 ng/ml [nanograms/milliliter], and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement the current standards of vaccinations regarding pneumonia for 1 of 5 residents (R22) over [AGE] years old whose vaccinations histories were reviewed. Findings include: The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identified on the PneumoRecs VaxAdvisor Application, revised 12/11/24 to reflect a change in age guidance, advised for patients over [AGE] years of age, Give at least one does of the PCV15, PCV20, or PCV21 at least one year after the last does of PPSV23. R22's face sheet, printed 4/16/25, indicated R22 was [AGE] years old at the time of survey, was cognitively intact and was initially admitted to the care center on 9/15/23. R22's Immunizations listed in her electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R22 received the PPSV23 (Pneumovax 23) on 6/30/11. No other pneumococcal vaccines were listed in R22's EMR. According to the CDC, R22 should receive at least one does of the PCV15, PCV20, or PCV21 at least one year after the last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and appropriately transfer a resident off the floor after an unwitnessed fall with potential head injury for 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed for falls. Findings include: R2's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R2 had diagnoses including a personal history of traumatic brain injury. R2 utilized a manual wheelchair independently and required supervision or touching assistance for transfers. R2's progress note dated 3/16/25, indicated R2 was involved in an altercation with another resident, R1, at 8:08 a.m. R2 was coming out of the elevator, R1 wanted to enter the elevator and started dragging R2's out. R1 grabbed R2's wheelchair which flipped him [R2] backward and R2 fell and hit the back of his head on the floor of the elevator. Progress note identified on assessment, no apparent redness, injury or bump noted at this time, included a set of vital signs, and noted R2 complained of pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) adequately addressed and monitored a known rodent (mouse) infestation that had the ability to affect all 68 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: During interview on 10/09/24, at 12:00 p.m. R4 stated there is mice on second floor where she lives and she sees them all of the time. You really need to check this out while you are here. During observation and interview on 10/09/24, at 12:08 p.m. trained medical assistant (TMA)-A stated R3 takes her lunch trays to her room and sometimes buys snacks to feed the mice in her room. During observation TMA-A walked to R3's room and opened her door, and a mouse was observed to run behind her night stand against her wall next to R3's bed. TMA-A further stated he thinks the mice sometimes come up on her bed. An observation on 10/9/24, at 11:00 a.m. of R3's room revealed a pile of food on top of a large tortilla shell consisting of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to implement effective and timely pest control measures to reduce and/or eliminate a mouse infestation in the facility. This had potential to affect all 68 residents whom resided in the facility. Findings include: During interview on 10/09/24, at 12:00 p.m. R4 stated there is mice on second floor where she lives and see's them all of the time and you really need to check this out while you are here. During observation and interview on 10/09/24, at 12:08 p.m. to follow up on R4's comment, on second floor trained medical assistant (TMA)-A stated R3 takes her lunch trays to her room and sometimes buys snacks to feed the mice in her room. During observation TMA-A walked to R3's room and opened her door, and a mouse was observed to run behind her night stand against her wall next to R3's bed. TMA-A further stated he thinks the mice sometimes come up on her bed. An observation on 10/9/24, at 11:00 a.m. of R3's room revealed a pile of food on top…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide timely notification to a provider/guardian for a missing resident for 1 of 1 residents (R1), who was sent to appointment without an escort and was missing for seven hours at the hospital until family member (FM)-A found him lost and confused looking for his room. Findings include: R1's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had a non-traumatic brain dysfunction, diabetes, asthma, anxiety, and Schizophrenia. R1's MDS further indicated independent with Activities of Daily Living, ambulate independently, and had acute on-set mental status change with disorganized thinking. R1's Care Plan, dated 9/18/24, indicated R1 had cognitive impairment, was not safe in the community, and could not leave the facility without an escort. R1 was at risk for falls due to impaired cognition, received psychotropic medication, and had a history of substance abuse. R1's progress notes identified on: 1) 9/18/24 at 7:30 p.m.: The resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to exercise reasonable care for the protection of the resident's property from loss or theft and ensure a lock box was provided for personal property and/or monies for 1 of 1 resident (R1) who had loss of property after removing $50.00 from his account. R1had recent traumatic brain injury and no recollection where the money went. The facility also failed to investigate where the missing money went or implement safety measures to protect resident property from potential loss or theft. Findings include: R1's significant change minimum data set (MDS dated [DATE], indicated R1 had a non-traumatic brain dysfunction, diabetes mellitus asthma, anxiety, and Schizophrenia. R1's MDS further indicated independence in activities in daily living ambulates independently, had acute on-set mental status change with disorganized thinking. R1's Care Plan, dated 9/18/24, indicated R1 had cognitive impairment, received psychotropic medication, and had a history of substance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to timely report an allegation of missing resident for 1 of 1 resident (R1) who had a traumatic brain injury was cognitively impaired went missing from the facility and was later found on the local hospital grounds. Findings include: In a Wandering and Elopement Risk Assessment, dated 9/17/24, R1 was identified to be at risk for elopement, resident is not safe in the community and cannot leave the facility without an escort. R1 has a recent diagnosis of traumatic brain injury, diabetes, schizoaffective disorder (serious mental disorder), seizure disorder, psychoactive (illicit drug) substance abuse, and opioid abuse. R1 ambulated independently and scored a 99 on his brief interview for mental status (BIM)s, dated 9/17/24, indicating unable to complete. R1's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had a non-traumatic brain dysfunction, diabetes, asthma, anxiety, and Schizophrenia. R1's MDS further indicated independent with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide timely notification to a provider for change in condition related to falls, or treatment after falls for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R5, R6) reviewed for change in condition. Findings include: R1's diagnoses list dated 9/6/24, indicated R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizophrenia, anxiety, depression, diabetes, drug induced subacute dyskinesia (involuntary muscle movement), and orthostatic hypotension (a sudden drop in blood pressure when standing from a seated or lying position with feelings of dizziness or feeling faint). R1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated moderately impaired cognition, and supervision with set-up assistance for bed mobility, transfers, eating, and toileting. R1's progress notes dated 8/12/24 at 10:48 p.m., indicated R1 fell near the elevator, and could not state how he fell, but R1 reported hitting his head, with a reddened area noted on the left side of the forehead. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of verbal abuse were reported immediately (within two hours) to the State Agency (SA) for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R3) reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 was cognitively intact and had no behaviors. On 6/20/24 at 4:40 p.m., a progress note indicated the director of nursing (DON) talked with R1 regarding an incident with a staff member. R1 didn't want police notified, and felt safe in the facility. R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R3 had mild cognitive impairment. On 6/23/24 at 5:50 p.m., a progress note indicated R3 reported that nursing assistant (NA-A) called her a crazy bitch and said, f . you to R3. The Nursing Home Incident Report dated 6/21/24, indicated the staff to resident incident between R1 and maintenance worker (M)-A occurred on 6/19/24 at 2:36 p.m The facility reported the incident on 6/21/24 at 2:16 p.m. nearly 48 hours…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-11 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 54 of 72 residents with personal funds accounts (including R1, R2, R4, R5, R6, R8) with the facility had access (and/or awareness of access) to their funds as soon as possible to meet their individualized needs, after hours, and on weekends. Findings include: State Agency (SA) report dated 4/9/24 at 1:47 p.m. indicated family member (FM)-A was concerned as R1 was not receiving his monthly income since the facility had taken over as payee for R1. FM-A indicated she had called to speak to someone at the facility and they had hung up on her. R1 was needing his money to buy things and was stressed as he did not know where his money was. Staff at the facility informed FM-A they could see R1 had over $600.00 dollars available. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated severe cognitive impairment. R1's admission record dated 4/12/24 at 1:04 p.m. indicated R1 had a guardian in place. R2's annual MDS dated [DATE], indicated R2 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-11 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide quarterly statements for resident personal fund accounts for 54 of 72 residents (including R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, and R9) residents reviewed for personal fund accounts. R2's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 was cognitively intact. On 4/11/24 at 8:28 a.m., stated she does not remember getting a statement of her resident fund account but she would like that. R3's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R5 was cognitively intact. On 4/11/24 at 8:41 a.m., R3 stated he had not gotten any statements from the facility and did not know how much money he has in the facility. R4's annual MDS dated [DATE], indicated R4 was cognitively intact. On 4/11/24 at 9:35 a.m., R4 indicated she had never gotten a statement for her funds in the facility that she could remember. R5's annual MDS dated [DATE], indicated R5 was moderately cognitively impaired. On 4/11/24 at 11:52 a.m., R5 stated he was not aware if he had any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) adequately addressed and monitored a known rodent (mouse) infestation that had the ability to affect all 72 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: R36's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R36 had intact cognition. During interview with R36 on 3/5/24 at 2:50 p.m., R36 stated, yes, I have concerns with mice keep running back and forth [pointing to wall baseboard along head of bed]. R36 stated, I told staff about it and they gave me a trap. R62's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified R62 with intact cognition. During interview with R62 on 3/4/24 at 8:49 a.m., R62 stated the care center had an issue with pests and rodents adding, There's mice all the time [here]. R62 stated he often heard noises around the room, including amongst his personal items, which then moved or would disappear when he tried to locate the source and believed these to be mice running around the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure an infection prevention and control surveillance system was created and implemented to identify, track, and analyze all resident infections to prevent the spread of communicable diseases and infectious organisms. In addition, the facility failed to have the infection control program reviewed annually. This had the potential to affect all 72 residents, staff and visitors in the facility. Findings include: During interview and document review with director of nursing (DON) and infection control preventionist (ICP) on 3/6/24 at 3:50 p.m., a review of the infection surveillance program lacked monitoring data, documentation, and follow-up of infections. DON displayed a spreadsheet that had been established with no data on it and a review of the facility infection surveillance program demonstrated there was no data collection tool completed to document infections, provide analysis and identify infections and infection risks. DON stated he was working with ICP to fill it in with data regarding surveillance. The ICP stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to implement effective and timely pest control measures to reduce and/or eliminate a mouse infestation in the facility. This had potential to affect all 72 residents whom resided in the facility. Findings include: A off-site Vulnerable Adult Maltreatment Report, dated 6/2023, identified several concerns with care at the care care center including, There are also mice running around everywhere at Facility. [Resident] is afraid they are going to crawl in bed with [resident] due to them running under [their] bed. An additional Vulnerable Adult Maltreatment Report, dated 8/2023, identified the reporter had concerns for health and safety of the resident population adding, There is a mice, flies and mold infestation at [the care center]. The report added, Reporter noticed mice was running around and flies when reporter looked at kitchen of Bywood East Health Care Nursing Home . [resident] is concerned with mice running around . this is a disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide the opportunity for 4 of 4 residents (R17, R28, R42, R48) reviewed to participate in care planning and care conferences. Findings include: R17 R17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R17's Brief Interview for Mental Status was left blank. The MDS indicated he was diagnosed with diabetes, depression, and a psychotic disorder. R17's Care Plan Revision/ Review report dated 12/14/23, indicated R17's care plan was revised/ reviewed for activities, dietary, and nursing needs but did not indicate that R17 attended or was invited to this meeting. R17's Brief Interview for Mental Status report dated 2/26/24, indicated that R17 had intact cognition with a score of 15/15. R17's medical record was reviewed and lacked evidence that R17 was invited or attended the care conference held on 12/14/23. During an interview on 3/4/24 at 7:52 a.m., R17 stated he did not recall attending or receiving an invitation to a care conference. R28…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records that contained private, medical, and personal information were not accessible to unauthorized personnel. Findings include: During observation and interview on 3/5/24 at 8:13 a.m., a 2nd floor nursing station laptop was left open with patient identifying information including a medication list was observed. No staff were present with ambulatory residents walking past it. The facility administrator exited a staff room adjacent to the unattended laptop and stated, this [pointing the open laptop] should not be visible to anyone for HIPPA [health information portability privacy act] reasons. During interview with trained medication aide (TMA)-A on 3/5/24 at 8:32 a.m., TMA-A stated she was responsible for the unattended laptop and stated, I should have closed or turned on the screen saver [before leaving the laptop]. TMA-A stated, the information is private and should not be left unattended. During observation and interview on 3/6/24 at 12:59 p.m., a 2nd floor nursing station laptop was left open and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed, retained in the medical record, and readily available to ensure continuity of care with mental health needs for one of two residents (R52) reviewed for PASARR. Findings include: R52's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R52 was cognitively intact and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R52's Medical Diagnoses list, printed 3/7/23, indicated R52 was admitted to the facility with a primary diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type (a mental health condition including symptoms of schizophrenia and mood disorders, such as depression or bipolar disorder) and secondary diagnoses of depression, unspecified mood disorder and bipolar disorder ( a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration that can make it difficult to carry out day-to-day tasks.) The Medical Diagnoses list did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to follow standards of practice related to medication administration for 1 of 1 resident (R228) reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: According to the National Institute of Health article titled, Nursing Rights of Medication Administration, last updated September 4, 2023, [the nurse is] the final person to check to see that the medication is correctly prescribed and dispensed before administration and upholding patient safety known as the 'five rights' or 'five R's' of medication administration. The five traditional rights in the traditional sequence include: Right patient .Right drug .Right route .Right time .Right dose. R228's admission assessment dated [DATE], identified R228 with an admission to the facility on 2/15/24 and with intact cognition. In addition, R228 had diagnoses of heart failure, cirrhosis (liver disease), diabetes, anxiety, manic depression, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure routine personal cares, including bathing and nail care, were offered or provided to maintain a dignified appearance and reduce the risk of complication (i.e., infection, skin impairments) for 1 of 1 resident (R20) reviewed who was legally blind. Findings include: R20's most recent Brief Interview for Mental Status (3.0 BIMS), dated 2/28/24, identified R20 had intact cognition. R20's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R20 demonstrated no rejection of care behaviors, had diabetes mellitus, and required no help for personal hygiene cares but substantial assistance with bathing. However, the spaces to recorded R20's cognition were left blank and not completed. On 3/4/24 at 8:29 a.m., R20 was observed standing upright in his shared room. R20 was dressed in a black-colored sweatshirt which had visible, white-colored dried substance on the front. R20 also had long fingernails present on both hands, with some nails…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess and implement new fall interventions for a resident with multiple falls to attempt to limit falls for 1 of 1 resident (R66) reviewed for falls. Additionally, the facility failed to accurately assess a resident observed with multiple burn holes in their clothing for safe smoking practices for 1 of 4 residents (R4) reviewed for smoking. Findings include: Falls: R66 R66's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated R66 was independent with all activities of daily living, non-ambulatory and had two or more falls since admission without serious injury. R66 refused cognitive testing, however appeared to be cognitively intact during interviews. R66's Medical Diagnoses list, printed 3/7/24, indicated R66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of unspecified paraplegia (Complete paralysis of the lower half of the body including both legs, often caused by damage to the spinal cord.) R66's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to provide therapeutic diets as prescribed by the physician for 1 of 1 (R48) residents reviewed for diet restrictions. Findings include: R48's admission record, dated 3/7/24, identified R48 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (diabetes), heart failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). R48's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and independence with eating. R48's care plan, dated 3/7/24, identified R48 under nutrition at risk for long and short-term complications related to alteration in blood glucose: type 2 diabetes. Goal: [R48] will have no hypoglycemic episodes [low blood sugar] through review dates; maintain weight through review date. Interventions: monitor blood glucose as ordered by MD, provide with oral medication(s) and/or insulin per DO [doctor order]; order labs per DO to monitor treatment; educate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure binding arbitration agreements for 2 of 2 residents (R57, R67) were clearly explained in a form and manner that they understood prior to entering into the binding arbitration agreements. Findings include: R57's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R57 admitted to facility on 4/27/22 and had intact cognition. Review of R57's signed Bywood East Health Care Arbitration Agreement dated 5/2/22, indicated, Resident and Bywood East Health Care will not be able to bring or start a lawsuit in any court and are giving -up all rights to a jury trial to decide any Disputes that Resident may have against Bywood East Health Care. Review of the agreement did not include evidence the binding arbitration agreement was explained in a form, manner and language that the resident or his or her representative understands. During interview with R57 on 3/6/24 at 9:11 a.m., R57 unable to recall signing admission paperwork informing him that he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-22 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to accurately assess 6 of 8 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R6, and R7) reviewed when their cognition and depression was not assessed on the minimum data set (MDS). Findings include: R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) dated 9/29/23, did not indicate R1's cognition, or depression test findings. R1 had a diagnosis of bipolar disease, dementia, chronic pain, panic attacks, heart disease, weakness, and poor nutritional intake. R1's MDS dated [DATE], indicated she had normal cognition and minimal depression. R2's MDS dated [DATE], indicated she had normal cognition and no depression. R2's diagnosis included dementia with behavioral issues, a mood disorder, lung disease, diabetes, and depression. R2's MDS dated [DATE], did not indicate his cognition and depression test results. R3's MDS dated [DATE], indicated mild cognitive impairment and minimal depression. R3's diagnosis included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-22 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — patternEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to develop and implement behavioral health comprehensive person-centered care plans providing care and services for 6 of 8 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R6, and R7) reviewed when their cognition and depression was not assessed, and recommendations from resident's psychologist were not added to the resident's care plans. Findings include: R1's care plan intervention dated 1/25/22, indicated her depression would be monitored per facility policy. In addition, staff were ordered to observe her for any mood or behavior changes. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS [a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents]) dated 9/29/23, did not indicate R1's cognition, or depression test findings. She had Bipolar disease, dementia, chronic pain, panic attacks, heart disease, weakness, and poor nutritional intake. R1's Associated Clinic of Psychology (ACP) note dated 11/28/23, directed staff to encourage her to spend more time in common spaces…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and document review, the facility failed to track behavior charting for resident to resident altercations for 4 of 8 residents (R1, R2, R3, and R4) reviewed when incidents occurred but not documented on the nursing assistant (NA) target behavior charting required to determine the residents' overall response to care plan interventions and meeting their behavior goals. Findings include: R1's MDS dated [DATE], identified she had normal cognition, minimal depression, bipolar disease, dementia, chronic pain, panic attacks, heart disease, weakness, and poor nutritional intake. R1's nursing note dated 1/8/24 at 9:51 p.m., indicated she was in a physical fight with another resident, and she was satisfied how she beat her up. R1's NA behavior charting regarding yelling or hitting others dated 12/24/23 through 1/22/24, did not indicate the 1/8/24, incident when she fought R2. R2's MDS dated [DATE], indicated her cognitive status and depression score was not assessed. He had dementia with behavioral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 residents (R1) was free from the use of manual restraint when staff held onto her wheelchair restraining her movement. Findings include: R1's Diagnoses List undated indicated R1's diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder with both schizophrenia and mood disorder symptoms), nicotine dependence, and alcohol dependence with intoxication. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had intact cognition, and utilized a wheelchair. On 8/20/23 at 4:15 a.m., a progress note written by registered nurse (RN)-A indicated, Around 2:25 a.m., (R1) came to the first floor and pulled on the medication cart, and was able to open it because it was not shut enough. Then the writer noticed she was hiding something in her clothes. The writer asked R1 what she had taken from the cart and R1 replied, I'm just curious about what's inside. When the writer went out of the office to see what she took from the cart, R1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify a resident representative timely of an incident that occurred for 1 of 8 residents (R10) reviewed for notification of change. Findings include: R10's Diagnoses List undated indicated R10 had degenerative disease of the nervous system, schizophrenia, developmental disorder of scholastic skills, history of traumatic brain injury, unspecified dementia, and mild cognitive impairment. R10's Face Sheet indicated an appointed guardian as his emergency contact. R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R10 had a memory problem, severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision-making skills. R10 displayed inattention and disorganized thinking continuously. R10 did not have verbal or physical aggression behaviors, did not reject care, or wander. R10 did not walk was independent with locomotion in his room and around the building in his wheelchair. R10's care plan dated 2/12/22, indicated R10 had alteration in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2026-05-07 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure survey results were available without an individual needing to ask to see the results. This deficient practice had the potential to impact on any person wishing to see, but not ask for, the survey results.Findings include:On 5/5/26 at 6:04 p.m., the administrator stated the survey book was at the front desk behind the desk in a holder, and there was notification of where it was. The book was not visible when facing the desk, a chest-high partition obstructed the book. A posted sign indicated annual state survey results were located at the front desk reception and were available and readily accessible for residents to view 24 hours daily. During an interview with the resident council on 5/6/26 at 2 p.m., an anonymous resident identified the survey results were there, but they had to ask for them.
- No harm found · C2026-05-07 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff posting included the current census and visible hours worked. This had the potential to impact all residents who resided at the facility.Findings include: During observations on 5/4/26, 5/5/26, and 5/6/26, staffing sheets were posted on all three floors of the facility. The name of the facility, staff names and disciplines were visible, but the hours scheduled, and current census were not visible.During an interview on 5/7/26 at 12:04 p.m., the director of nursing (DON) stated the scheduler posted the daily staffing on all three units. The DON confirmed the current census was not being included in the posting.During an interview on 5/5/26 at 6:04 p.m., the administrator stated we post the schedule each day on the unit and showed the location where the schedule was posted on the first floor. The schedule was in an acrylic stand behind a plexiglass window. The front page visible through the plexiglass was dated 5/5/26, and included names of staff, and titles sorted by shift. Hours worked were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure shared resident' rooms had adequate floor space (i.e., at least 80 square feet [SF] per resident) for 23 of 23 rooms (101, 102, 107, 108, 109, 208, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 301, 302, 307, 308, 309, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317 ). This had potential to affect any resident who currently or potentially could occupy these shared room spaces.Findings include:A provided Room Assignment and Census Report (RACR), dated 4/13/26, indicated a facility census of 64 and identified current residents and their corresponding rooms at the care center and also identified rooms with open beds that would be occupied by three residents when full. These identified rooms 101, 102, 107, 108, 109, 208, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 301, 302, 307, 308, 309, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317 each either already had three residents present or accommodation to accept three residents within the same room. The RACR indicated three rooms currently housed three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-04-17 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's state survey results were kept in a location that was readily accessible to all residents. This had the potential to affect all 70 residents and/or visitors who could wish to review the information. Findings include: R47's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R47 had intact cognition. R48's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R48 had severely impaired cognition. During an interview on 4/15/25 at 12:12 p.m. with R47 and R48, they confirmed they did not know that state survey results were available to be read and R47 confirmed he would be interested in seeing them. During an observation and interview on 4/15/25 at 1:03 p.m., the administrator stated the survey results were kept in a binder in the locked office of the first-floor nursing station. The administrator was observed to obtain a binder with the state survey results from a shelf in the locked first-floor nursing station office. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-04-17 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a subset (i.e., discharge) Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed and transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) database in a timely manner for 3 of 5 residents (R58, R62, R30) reviewed for MDS accuracy. Findings include: The CMS Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, dated 10/2023, identified all applicable MDS along with their completion and transmission dates required. This included, Discharge Assessment - return not anticipated, listed with a transmission date of, MDS Completion Date + 14 calendar days. R58 R58's Census List, printed 4/15/25, identified R58's status and location (i.e., room) within the care center for the entire duration of his stay. This identified R58 discharged on 10/25/24 with text adjacent, STOP BILLING, and, DD-discharge date . R58's corresponding progress note, dated 10/25/24, identified R58 had left the care center against medical advice (AMA) and returned home. However, R58's medical record lacked evidence a discharge MDS had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure shared resident' rooms had adequate floor space (i.e., 80 square feet [SF] per resident) for 23 of 23 rooms (101, 102, 107, 108, 109, 208, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 301, 302, 307, 308, 309, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317 ). This had potential to affect 69 of 69 residents who currently or potentially could occupy these shared room spaces. Findings include: A provided Room Assignment and Census Report, dated 4/14/25, indicated a facility census of 70 and identified current residents and their corresponding rooms at the care center and also identified rooms with open beds that would be occupied by three residents when full. This identified rooms 101, 102, 107, 108, 109, 208, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 301, 302, 307, 308, 309, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317 each either already had three residents present or accommodation to accept three residents within the same room. The Aspen Central Office (ACO) database, which is used by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) to track past survey results and,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-09-06 · tag F0714 — widespreadEnsure the physician properly assigns and delegates tasks to a physician assistant, nurse practitioner or clinical nurse specialist.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to develop a policy and procedure for physician delegation of tasks for disciplines working under the physician's supervision. This had the potential to affect all 69 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: On 9/6/24, facility policies were reviewed. The policies lacked a procedure for physician delegation of tasks. On 9/6/24 at 5:22 p.m., the administrator stated he was unable to locate a policy or procedure addressing physician delegation of tasks.
- No harm found · C2024-09-06 · tag F0715 — widespreadEnsure the physician properly assigns and delegates tasks to a qualified dietitian (or other qualified nutrition professional); or to a qualified therapist.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to develop a policy and procedure for physician delegation of tasks to the dietician. This had the potential to affect all 69 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: On 9/6/24, facility policies were reviewed. The policies lacked a procedure for physician delegation of tasks to the dietician. On 9/6/24 at 5:22 p.m., the administrator stated he was unable to locate a policy or procedure addressing physician delegation of tasks to the dietician.
- No harm found · C2024-09-06 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the failed to establish and implement a policy related to the responsibility of the administrator to report to and being held accountable by the Governing Body. This had the potential to affect all 69 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 9/6/24, facility policies were reviewed and documentation was requested from the facility to demonstrate the facility had current policies and procedures related to the Governing Body. On 9/6/24 at 5:22 p.m., the administrator stated the facility did not have a policy about the Governing Body.
- No harm found · C2024-09-06 · tag F0841 — widespreadDesignate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to develop a policy and procedure defining the responsibilities of the Medical Director. Findings include: On 9/6/24, facility policies were reviewed. The policies lacked a policy and procedure for responsibilities of the Medical Director. On 9/6/24 at 5:22 p.m., the administrator stated the facility did not have a policy addressing the responsibilities of the Medical Director, nor a Medical Director position description.
- No harm found · C2024-09-06 · tag F0844 — widespreadFollow rules about disclosure of ownership requirements and tell the state agency about changes in ownership and/or administrative personnel.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the State Agency (SA) was notified as required when the current director of nursing (DON) was hired for the position. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 69 residents in the facility. Findings include: During the extended survey on 9/6//24, evidence was requested to demonstrate the SA had been notified when the DON was hired. On 9/6/24 at 5:22 p.m., the administrator confirmed the SA was not notified when the DON was hired.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure newly admitted residents received a physician visit every 30 days for the first ninety days for 1 of 3 residents (R5) reviewed for 30-day physician visits. In addition, the facility failed to ensure long term residents received routine physician visits (every 60 days) for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R5, R6) reviewed for routine physician care. Findings include: R1's Diagnoses List undated indicated diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, diabetes, seizures, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. R1's medical record indicated R's physician examined R1 on 12/31/23, and 1/31/24, but not since. The clinical record further indicated a nurse practitioner (NP) saw R1 on 2/28/24, 4/17/24 and 6/19/24. R1's record lacked indication R1 had received routine 60-day visits and alternating visits by a physician. R5's Diagnoses List undated indicated diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, vascular dementia, and diabetes. R5's clinical record indicated an NP saw R5 for the initial visit on 7/31/24, and R5's physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-03-07 · tag F0848 — widespreadProvide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to offer a neutral and fair arbitration process by ensuring both the resident and his or her representative, and the facility agree on the selection of a neutral arbitrator, and that the venue is convenient to both parties for 2 of 2 residents (R57, R67) reviewed for binding arbitration. Findings include: R57's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R57 was admitted to facility on 4/27/22 and had intact cognition. Review of R57's signed Bywood East Health Care Arbitration Agreement dated 5/2/22, documented, The arbitration shall be administered by the American Arbitration Association (AAA) in accordance with its Rules of Procedure. additionally, The Arbitration will be conducted at a site selected by Bywood East Health Care which shall be either at Bywood East Health Care or somewhere within a reasonable distance of Bywood East Health Care. R67's admission MDS dated [DATE], identified R67 admitted to facility on 7/3/23 and had intact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure shared resident' rooms had adequate floor space (i.e., 80 square feet [SF] per resident) for 9 of 9 rooms (101, 102, 108, 109, 301, 302, 307, 308, 309) reviewed. This had potential to affect 27 of 27 residents who currently or potentially could occupy these shared room spaces. Findings include: A provided Midnight Census Report, dated 3/4/24, identified the current residents and their corresponding rooms at the care center. This identified rooms 101, 102, 108, 109, 301, 302, 307, 308, and 309 each either already had three residents present or accommodation to accept three residents within the same room. The Aspen Central Office (ACO) database, which is used by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) to track past survey results and, if applicable, any granted waivers of Federal health requirements identified the care center have several shared room(s) which had less than 80 square feet per resident (via total room square…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-08-31 · tag F0836 — widespreadEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to be in compliance with the supplemental nursing service agency (SNSA) requirements when the facility obtained nursing services from Reliable Nursing Staffing Services LLC (an SNSA) which was not registered with the commissioner. This had the potential to affect all 78 residents of the facility who received services from the supplemental staff. Findings include: Document review of the facility's daily schedule from 8/20/23 through 8/24/23, it was verified Reliable Nursing Staffing Services LLC provided supplemental licensed practical nurse (LPN) staffing to the facility. On 8/31/23 at 10:06 a.m., the staffing coordinator (SC)-A stated LPN-A had been providing services in the facility for awhile as he was with two other agencies prior to starting his own agency. SC-A stated LPN-A was the owner of Reliable Nursing Staffing Services LLC. At 10:44 a.m., SC-A stated she could not find Reliable Nursing Staffing Services LLC on the Minnesota Department of Health's (MDH) SNSA registry. On 8/31/23, at 3:00 p.m., SC-A stated she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in MN
CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 24E185. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.