Grand Avenue Rest Home
3956 Grand Avenue S0uth, Minneapolis, MN 55409 · For profit - Corporation · 20 certified beds · (612) 824-1434 Medicaid only — no Medicare
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568, F0570)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.8% | 18.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.3% | 4.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.9% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.6% | 4.1% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 4.0% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.2% | 20.5% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.7% | 12.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 60.0% | 96.1% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.0% | 5.2% | 4.7% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 1.1% | 24.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 81.0% | 17.1% | 17.1% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 20 beds and averages 18.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 0.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.54 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity for 1 of 3 residents (R1) when the facility conducted searches of R1's personal belongings/room without R1's or her representative 's consent.Findings include:R1's admission Record dated 5/29/23 indicated R1's diagnoses included Major depressive disorder, suicidal ideation, anxiety disorder, psychosis, and schizoaffective disorder.R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R1 is completely independent with activities of daily living (ADLs) and had intact cognition.R1's care plan, dated 4/28/25, indicated R1 drinks alcohol when under stress and got into a fight with peer. Staff interventions included random room/personal effect searches when indicated and as needed.R1's treatment administration record (TAR) dated 6/25/25, included and order to checks/searches R1's room for for alcohol (ETOH). The TAR indicated for nursing staff conducted R1's room searches on 10/1/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure soiled linen was covered when transporting it through facility. This had the potential to impact all 19 residents of the facility. Findings include: During observation on 9/8/25 at 11:50 a.m., a staff member was observed walking through first floor living room and dining room with uncovered linen basket that also had no liner or bag. There were 4 residents sitting in the living room and 3 residents sitting in the dining room as he walked past. Staff transported uncovered linen outside of the building and around the corner to the back of the facility and then entered the facility to walk down the stairs to the laundry room.During interview with on 9/8/25 at 2:06 p.m., with trained medication aide (TMA)-A admitted he was the one that transported the uncovered soiled linen from upstairs of the facility (second floor) and walked it down the stairs, through the living room and dining room to outside the facility and around the back to the basement laundry area. TMA-A verified the dirty linen basket he transported had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure facility was kept sanitary and maintained in good repair which had the potential to affect all 19 residents, staff, and visitors of the facility.Findings include:Walls:During observation on 9/8/25 at 12:18 p.m., wallboard under the hand railing leading to second floor had several areas of missing wallboard and peeling paint showing underlayment. The dining room had curling vinyl tile on the floor along wall the with the window and old-style radiator. A window air conditioner unit was attached to the upper sash of window that had curled up blue masking tape surrounding it while it was wedged into the window on a board. Air space was observed on the bottom of the unit. On second floor, the shower room had broken vinyl wall board at the top of wall above the toilet. The second-floor lounge room had an alcove with exposed mechanical venting material, and the three walls were peeling and missing paint and part of baseboard. In addition, dark red carpet on the floor of second floor lounge area had area of 24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed provide and document appropriate nonpharmacological interventions prior to administering as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication consumption for 3 of 5 residents (R16, R17, R1) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: R16’s annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R16 with experiencing hallucinations (false perceptions that seem real but are not) and delusions (misconceptions or beliefs that are opposite of reality), and had psychiatric diagnoses of anxiety, depression, psychotic disorder, schizophrenia and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). R16’s Pharmacist Consultant Report dated July 11, 2025-July 13, 2025, identified “[R16] receives frequent doses of diazepam prn (as needed psychotropic medication). Ensure staff document dangerous or distressful behavior, nonpharmacological interventions attempted before psychotropic administration, and effectiveness of the psychotropic and any adverse effects.” R16’s physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was maintained to ensure appropriate care was provided for 1 of 2 residents (R1) reviewed for discharge planning. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/13/25, indicated R1 had intact cognition with hallucination, delusions with fluctuating disorganized thinking and was independent with all activities of daily living (ADLs). Section Q indicated there was no active discharge plan for resident to return to the community. During an interview on 9/8/25 at 2:44 p.m., R1 stated she was looking forward to moving to an assisted living. R1 stated she had an assessment and was told it might take 6 months to find a place which R1 was frustrated by. R1 stated again that she wants to move out of the facility.R1's care plan, printed 9/8/25, indicated the following: -Discharge plan: discharge plans reviewed with resident on 3/10/25 and R1 wants to remain in the facility and does not have any plans to discharge. Resident only want to be asked about discharge plans…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to collaborate with a resident's external mental health provider to ensure adequate behavioral services were provided if needed for 1 of 2 residents (R4) reviewed for behavioral Health Services. Findings include: R4's quarterly minimum data set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was cognitively intact. R4's diagnoses list, printed 9/18/25, indicated R4 had several medical diagnoses including major depressive disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). R4's care plan, revised 12/19/24, indicated R4 had a history of trauma and was classified high risk and in need for psychotherapy for PTSD. Interventions included ACP [Associated Clinic of Psychology] therapy with her provider. R4's electronic medical record (EMR) lacked evidence the facility was in collaboration with R4's outside therapy provider. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacist recommendations were acted upon timely for 2 of 5 residents (R3, R1) reviewed for unnecessary medication use.Findings include: Findings include: R3’s quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R3 with diagnoses of hallucinations (false perceptions that seem real but are not) and delusions (misconceptions or beliefs that are opposite of reality), anxiety, schizophrenia, and was taking antipsychotics and antidepressants. R3’s physician orders dated 2/22/25 identified the following: Quetiapine Fumarate Oral Tablet 400mg, give 400mg by mouth at bedtime related to SCHIZOAFFECTIVE DISORDER, BIPOLAR TYPE (F25.0) with Medication Class: ANTIPSYCHOTICS/ANTIMANIC AGENTS, Quetiapine Fumarate Oral Tablet 100mg, give 100mg by mouth at bedtime related to SCHIZOAFFECTIVE DISORDER, BIPOLAR TYPE (F25.0) with Medication Class: ANTIPSYCHOTICS/ANTIMANIC AGENTS, and ARIPiprazole ER Intramuscular Prefilled Syringe 400MG, inject…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure recommended influenza, pneumococcal, and Covid-19 vaccinations, as outlined by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), were offered and/or provided in a timely manner to reduce the risk of severe disease for 1 of 5 residents (R3) reviewed for immunizations.Findings include: R3's immunization tab and progress notes in electronic medical record (EMR) lacked evidence R3 was educated about, offered, and received or declined the influenza, pneumococcal and Covid-19 vaccine.During interview with infection control preventionist (ICP) on 9/10/25 at 11:36 a.m., ICP stated expectation of facility to offer and document vaccine status for all residents. ICP stated expectation of staff to document in a progress note of any vaccine education, what was offered, what was received or declined. ICP reviewed R3's EMR and stated R3 EMR lacked documentation of refusals and follow up for influenza, pneumococcal, and Covid vaccine status.Facility policy titled Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations and Covid, updated 05/14/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — widespreadDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare resident care plans with an interdisciplinary team (IDT) to include a nursing aide (NA), the attending physician, or a resident/resident representative. This deficiency had the ability to affect all 19 residents. Findings include: During an interview on 1/21/25 at 9:11 a.m., the director of nursing (DON) stated the IDT consists of an RN, the administrator, herself, the social worker, a member from medical records, the infection preventionist (IP) nurse, the minimum data set (MDS) nurse, and a compliance nurse. During an interview on 1/21/25 at 9:39 a.m., the administrator stated the facility's IDT consists of a RN, the DON, a member of the activities department, herself, the social services director, the social services assistant, and a member of the kitchen. During an interview on 1/21/25 at 11:35 a.m., the DON stated they do not take IDT notes. The DON stated during the IDT meetings they will look at the risk management and then they will update the care plan. The DON stated they do not take notes as to what they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure their director of nursing (DON) was a registered nurse (RN) when the facility had a licensed practical nurse (LPN) in the DON role since 7/30/24. This deficiency had the ability the affect all 19 residents. Findings include: During an interview on 1/16/25 at 11:39 a.m., the administrator stated the DON is a LPN. The administrator she knew the facility has to hire an RN to be in the DON role. There is not a signed DON job description for the current DON. During an email correspondence on 1/16/25 at 2:21 p.m., the administrator stated the DON has been in her role since 7/30/24. During an interview on 1/21/25 at 9:11 a.m., the DON stated she is a LPN who worked a the facility full time. On 1/16/25, the facility provided the DON's LPN license which is valid. The facility provided the DON's education which did not contain any training for the DON role. The facility provided an undated Director of Nursing job description. The description stated an RN must be hired in the DON role.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was scheduled for a minimum of eight consecutive hours a day. This had the potential to affect all 18 residents at the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility staff schedules and staffing hours from 1/1/24 to 3/31/24 revealed there was no RN scheduled for 1/14/24, 1/20/24, 1/21/24, 1/27/24, 1/28/24, 2/3/24, 2/4/24, 2/16/24, 2/17/24, 2/18/24, 2/24/24, 3/2/24, 3/3/24, 3/9/24, 3/10/24, 3/16/24, 3/17/24, 3/23/24, 3/30/24, and 3/31/24. During interview on 8/26/24 at 9:17 a.m., the interim director on nursing (DON) confirmed the dates identified that there was no RN coverage. During a follow up interview on 8/28/24 at 9:39 a.m., the interim DON stated they were to have an RN in the building at least 8 hours a day. Requested a policy regarding staffing, none provided.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-28 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify quality deficiencies and to develop and implement appropriate actions to correct these deficiencies. Furthermore, the facility failed to have evidence of a Performance Improvement Project (PIP) which focused on high risk or problem-prone areas identified thorough and appropriate data collection and analysis and evaluation of the identified concern(s) during Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI). This had the potential to affect all 18 residents. Findings include: A review of the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting (CASPER) system report (a quality measure report for nursing facilities) last updated 8/18/24, indicated the facility had the following deficiencies with a survey exit date of 9/01/23: - F727 RN Coverage for 8 hours per day for 7 days per week. - F758 Free from Unnecessary psychotropic medications. - F880 Infection prevention and control. - F881 Antibiotic Stewardship program - Emergency Preparedness (EP)0009 Local, State, Tribal Collaboration Process - EP0029…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based off interview, observation, and document review the facility failed to utilize proper handling of linen to prevent contamination, failed to have a functioning infection surveillance program, and failed to have a functioning water management program. This had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility. Linen During an observation on 8/26/24 at 2:53 p.m., nursing assistance (NA)-A walked through the kitchen carrying a mesh-designed hamper and within it, dirty resident clothing. During an interview on 8/26/24 at 2:55 p.m., cook aide (CA)-B stated other staff will walk through the kitchen with laundry or go out and around the back. During an observation and interview on 8/27/24 at 2:04 p.m., NA-A carried an uncovered basket of clean linen through the kitchen. NA-[NAME] stated this was their process to bring clothing through the kitchen, clean and dirty. During an interview on 8/28/24 at 9:33 a.m., the interim director of nursing (DON) stated staff should be using the back door to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to have a functioning antibiotic stewardship program. This had the potential to affect any resident who had infections requiring antibiotic use. Findings include: During an interview on 8/28/24 at 10:04 a.m., the infection preventionist (IP) stated they started this role two weeks ago and identified there was no functioning antibiotic stewardship program in place. IP stated it was their intention to rebuild the program. The one-page Grand Avenue Rest Home Antibiotic Stewardship Program policy undated, indicated the IP will track and assess all antibiotic use to review patterns of use and assure appropriate antibiotic use . The IP will review any antibiotic order and reassess the ongoing need for and choice of an antibiotic as more information becomes available. The policy lacked protocols and criteria for determining what was appropriate use.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure orthostatic blood pressure monitoring was in place for 4 of 5 residents (R1, R8, R5, R13) reviewed for psychotropic medications. Findings include: R1 R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated she had intact cognition, had hallucinations and delusions, exhibited no physical, verbal or wandering behaviors, and had diagnoses of high blood pressure, high cholesterol, anxiety, depression and schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by thoughts or experiences, seemingly out of touch with reality, that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly). R1's MDS further indicated she took antidepressant, antianxiety, and antipsychotic medications on a routine basis. R1's Care Area Assessment (CAA) for psychotropic drug use dated 2/28/24, indicated she mental illnesses and was being treated long-term with psychotropic medications for her personal best in mental health stability. The CAA indicated all disciplines…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to notify and consult with the resident's physician after a resident (R1) was tested for Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated she had intact cognition, had hallucinations and delusions, exhibited no physical, verbal or wandering behaviors, and had diagnoses of high blood pressure, high cholesterol, anxiety, depression and schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by thoughts or experiences, seemingly out of touch with reality, that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly). R1's Care Area Assessment (CAA) for nutritional status dated 2/28/24, identified she had a respiratory disease that could affect her appetite or nutritional status. An initial nursing assessment, careplan, and progress notes document dated 2/21/24, indicated R1's lung sounds were clear with no labored breathing noted. The assessment further indicated R1 did not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure personal privacy could be maintained in resident room for 1 of 3 residents (R8) reviewed for privacy. Findings include: R8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated she had intact cognition and was independent with her activities of daily living (ADLs). R8's MDS also indicated she had diagnoses of anxiety, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by thoughts or experiences, seemingly out of touch with reality, that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly). Furthermore, the MDS indicated R8 experienced hallucinations and delusions and exhibited verbal and other behavioral symptoms for 1-3 days during the lookback period. R8's annual MDS dated [DATE], indicated she felt it was very important to take care of her personal belongings and things. A progress note dated 3/25/24 indicated staff knocked on R8's door and when they did not hear a response, opened the door, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a potential incident of neglect was recognized and reported to the State Agency (SA) after the administration had knowledge of the incident. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings include: During interview on 8/27/24 at 11:17 a.m. interim Director of Nursing (DON) stated she was aware of a fire that had taken place a few weeks before she started working at the facility. DON stated she did not see any investigation report regarding the fire. DON stated she did not know if the fire had been reported to the SA. During interview on 08/27/24 at 11:28 a.m. Administrator acknowledged there had been a fire in the smoking room on the second floor of the facility sometime in May 2024 and the incident should have been investigated by the social worker (SW). Administrator went on to say she expected staff to file an incident report, update the management staff and complete all appropriate reporting to SA. Administrator stated the SW was enroute to the facility and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure resident medications were re-ordered in a timely manner for 1 of 1 residents (R1). Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated she had intact cognition, had hallucinations and delusions, exhibited no physical, verbal or wandering behaviors, and had diagnoses of high blood pressure, high cholesterol, anxiety, depression and schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by thoughts or experiences, seemingly out of touch with reality, that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly). R1's Care Area Assessment (CAA) for nutritional status dated [DATE], identified she had a respiratory disease that could affect her appetite or nutritional status. R1's Care Area Assessment (CAA) for psychotropic drug use dated [DATE], indicated she mental illnesses and was being treated long-term with psychotropic medications for her personal best in mental health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to recognize a change in respiratory status for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed for change of condition. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated she had intact cognition, had hallucinations and delusions, exhibited no physical, verbal or wandering behaviors, and had diagnoses of high blood pressure, high cholesterol, anxiety, depression and schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by thoughts or experiences, seemingly out of touch with reality, that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly). R1's Care Area Assessment (CAA) for nutritional status dated 2/28/24, identified she had a respiratory disease that could affect her appetite or nutritional status. An initial nursing assessment, careplan, and progress notes document dated 2/21/24, indicated R1's lung sounds were clear with no labored breathing noted. The assessment further indicated R1 did not have a cough. R1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure smoking interventions were implemented to reduce the risk for avoidable injuries for 1 of 1 (R7) reviewed for smoking. Findings include: R7's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R7 had diagnoses to include depression, schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects a person's thoughts, feelings, and behaviors), and asthma. R7's smoking assessments dated 9/27/22, 12/27/22, 6/23/23, and 8/14/24 indicated R7 had a history of injuries secondary to smoking, and staff should store all smoking supplies in the nursing office. R7's care plan with an initiated date of 10/13/22 and revision date of 8/14/24, indicated R7 was on a smoking plan, could receive 10 cigarettes per day, and facility staff was to store her smoking supplies. The care plan also indicated R7 would be assessed for safe smoking practices at time of admission, significant change, and annually for determination of ability to smoke safely. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure they were free of a medication error rate of five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 8% with 2 errors out of 25 opportunities for errors involving 1 of 5 residents (R1) who were observed during the medication pass. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 was cognitively intact and independent with most activities of daily living. The MDS indicated R1 had anxiety disorder, depression, and shortness of breath with exertion (activity). R1's annual MDS dated [DATE], identified R1 had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease that limits airflow which may cause breathing problems). R1's care plan focus initiated on [DATE], indicated Resident uses Anti-Depressant (Zoloft) related to Diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder: Resident displays: Depression, Feeling depressed, bad about self, sleep problems. Staff were tasked with providing medications per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a once monthly injection was administered per physician orders, resulting in the monthly injection being administered twice over two days for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for medication errors. Findings include: R1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R1 was cognitively intact and independent with activities of daily living. R1's Face Sheet dated 7/18/24 indicated R1 had diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder,and extrapyramidal movement disorder (brain abnormalities that can lead to motor deficits). R1's Physician Order started 7/4/24 directed Invega Sustenna (Antipsychotic) Intramuscular Suspension Prefilled Syringe 234 milligrams/1.5 milliliters (Paliperidone Palmitate). Inject 1 dose intramuscularly one time a day every 28 days related to schizoaffective disorder. R1's care plan dated 7/10/24 indicated on 7/3/24, due to increased behaviors, nursing reviewed medication records and discovered that Invega…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-15 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to maintain a system that assured full and complete accounting of resident personal funds entrusted to the facility which had the potential to affect 14 of 14 residents who had trust fund accounts. In addition, the facility failed to provide quarterly statements for individual resident trust fund accounts for 5 of 14 residents (R6, R9, R1, R10, R14) reviewed who had resident trust accounts accounts. Findings include: On 4/11/24 at 10:09 a.m., the director of nursing (DON) stated the facility kept petty cash withdrawn from the resident trust funds in two locations, a cash box for use during business hours and a cash box in the nursing cart for use after hours. The DON counted the cash in the business hours box which totaled $293.59 and the cash in the after hours box which totaled $99.05. The DON confirmed the combined total cash was $392.64. The business hours box also contained receipts for two resident withdrawals from 4/10/24 totaling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-15 · tag F0570 — patternAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the surety bond contained sufficient funds to insure and protect the total balance of the resident trust fund, which had the potential to affect 14 of 14 residents (R1 to R14) who had a personal trust account managed by the facility. Findings include: The transaction history for the facility's resident trust fund savings account from 4/1/24 to 4/11/24, identified the account balance on 4/11/24 was $21,783.88. The transaction history for the facility's resident trust fund checking account from 4/1/24 to 4/11/24, identified the account balance on 4/11/24 was $2,636. The combined total balance on 4/11/24 of the two resident trust fund accounts was $24,419.88. The facility's surety bond (legally binding contract protecting the resident trust funds) with effective date of 9/9/23, was for a sum of $20,000. The sum was inadequate to cover the balance of the resident trust fund on 4/11/24. During an interview on 4/15/24 at 10:36 a.m., the chief financial officer (CFO) stated the surety bond did not cover the balance of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to update a care plan to include a resident history of leaving the facility against the leave of absence policy for 1 of 3 patients reviewed when R1, who was her own person, left the facility overnight and did not inform staff when she would return. R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 10:10 a.m. from an outside facility. R1's diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, post-traumatic stress disorder, schizoaffective disorder, delusional disorders, and major depressive disorder. On 3/27/24, a progress note indicated R1 left the facility at approximately 10:30 a.m. On 3/28/24 at 8:52 a.m., a progress note indicated R1 had returned at an undetermined point and planned to leave the facility again on 3/28/24. On 3/29/24 at 6:26 a.m., a progress note indicated R1 did not return to the facility during the overnight shift. On 3/29/24 at 10:10 a.m., a progress note indicated R1 refuse to disclose her whereabout to the facility but would contact the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to grant a resident request to access their personal funds within three business days for one of one resident (R1) reviewed for personal funds when the facility was notified on 1/8/24 the resident would like to access her money and the facility denied her access. Findings include: R1's admission Record printed on 2/16/24 indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with primary diagnoses of a traumatic brain injury and depression. R1's Trust Account Authorization dated 8/25/23, indicated R1 authorized the facility to handle any or all her personal funds and to assist her with business mail as needed. R1's care plan initiated 8/1/22 and revised 11/8/22 and 5/23/23 indicated R1 was her own person, and she managed her own finances responsibly. R1's care plan indicated R1 continued to manage her finances independently and staff would assist with money management if requested. R1's care plan indicated R1 brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a resident with quarterly statements and upon request for two of two residents (R1, R2) reviewed for personal funds when R1 and R2 stated they have not received quarterly statements from the facility. Findings include: R1's admission Record printed on 2/16/24 indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with primary diagnoses of a traumatic brain injury and depression. R1's Resident Funds Policy dated 10/27/21 signed by R1 indicated each resident would have a financial record of beginning balances, deposits, and withdraws. R1's Trust Account Authorization dated 8/25/23 signed by R1 indicated quarterly statements would be issued to the resident or guardian at the end of each calendar quarter. The policy indicated review and/or additional statements would be available upon request during regular business hours. R2's admission Record printed on 2/21/24 indicated R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to report staff to resident abuse timely for 1 of 1 resident (R1) who alleged verbal abuse by staff. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition. During an interview on 10/25/23 at 3:30 p.m., licensed social worker (LSW) indicated on 10/22/23, she had gone into the facility electronic records from home to review progress notes and read a progress note the director of nursing (DON) had wrote on 10/20/23 at 12:31 p.m. regarding a staff to resident verbal altercation which should have been reported. LSW stated she spoke with the DON on 10/22/23, around 3:30 p.m. and informed her the incident should have been filed with the state and the immediately investigated. LSW stated she then notified the administrator (out on funeral leave) on 10/22/23. LSW verified they filed the complaint with state agency (SA) on 10/22/23, between 5:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. (more than 48 hours later). During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to prevent potential further abuse during an investigation and ensure allegations of potential abuse were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 1 resident (R1) who reported allegations of staff to resident abuse. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition, hallucinations (perceptual experiences in the absence of real external sensory stimuli) and delusions (misconceptions or beliefs that are firmly held, contrary to reality). R1's medical diagnoses included: anxiety disorder, depression, and schizophrenia (mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally). R1's progress noted on 10/20/23 at 12:39 p.m., director of nursing (DON) indicated R1 reported she had been yelled at by a staff in the morning, felt suicidal, and did not want to get out of bed. DON wrote R1 was out of bed and appeared anxious. DON spoke with R1 and she denied suicidal ideation's, endorsed being yelled at by staff, and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as prescribed by the physician for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who reported symptoms of constipation. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition, hallucinations (perceptual experiences in the absence of real external sensory stimuli) and delusions (misconceptions or beliefs that are firmly held, contrary to reality). R1's medical diagnoses included: anxiety disorder, depression, and schizophrenia (mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally). R1 was independent with personal hygiene, toileting, and continent of bowel. R1's face sheet dated 10/26/23, identified diagnoses constipation and intestinal obstruction. R1's physician orders identified: - 4/20/22, Metamucil Fiber Packet (Psyllium) give 1 packet by mouth two times a day related to constipation. Take in 8 ounce (oz) liquid. -12/24/22, Bowel monitoring 1 unspecified miscellaneous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0570 — widespreadAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the purchased surety bond (a contract or promise by a surety or guarantor to pay if a second party fails to meet the obligation) had sufficient coverage to protect the total account balance of the resident trust fund. This had the potential to affect 15 of 15 residents who had a trust account while residing at the facility. Findings include: A facility provided Trust Transaction History report dated 8/31/23, identified 15 current resident trust accounts were managed by the facility. The sum of all 15 resident trust accounts on 8/31/23 totaled $16,659.88. During an interview on 8/31/23 at 2:06 p.m., the medical records specialist (MRS)-A, who was responsible for the day-to-day accounting for resident trust accounts, indicated he was unaware of a surety bond. During interview on 9/1/23 at 8:02 a.m., the administrator stated he would have to request the surety bond as he did not have it on hand. A Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company Verification Certificate dated 2/1/23 and effective until 1/31/23 was provided on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was scheduled for a minimum of eight consecutive hours a day. This had the potential to affect all 17 residents at the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility staff schedules and staffing hours from 6/1/23 to 8/28/23 revealed there was no RN scheduled for 6/24/23, 7/8/23, 7/9/23, 7/31/23, 8/12/23, 8/26/23 and 8/27/23. During an interview on 8/30/23 at 8:46 a.m., the director of nursing (DON) stated the facility tried to keep an RN on staff 8 hours per day 7 days a week, but sometimes did not happen. The DON stated she was the RN coverage during the weekdays, but there were occasional RN call-ins that took place on the weekend that could only be replaced by licensed practical nurses (LPNs) from a staffing agency. During an interview on 8/31/23 at 10:31 a.m., the administrator reviewed staff schedules and staffing hours from 6/1/23 to 8/28/23. The administrator verified no RN was onsite 6/24/23, 7/8/23, 7/9/23. 7/31/23, 8/12/23, 8/26/23 or 8/27/23. The administrator stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure cooking utensils were properly sanitized (i.e., high temperature) in 1 of 1 commercial dishwashers observed in the main production kitchen. This had potential to affect all 17 residents, visitors, and staff who consumed food from the kitchen. Finding include: During interview on 8/30/23 at 10:49 a.m., dietary manager (DM) stated she usually worked at another facility but was spending more time at this facility due to staffing shortages and was training a new full-time dietary supervisor (DS). DM identified the dishwasher was [NAME], used heat to sanitize, was installed in 1998, held one rack, and required a wash temperature of 150 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) and a rinse temperature of 180°F to ensure dishes were sanitized. Staff tracked temperatures at each meal on a form located on the counter. During observation and interview on 8/30/23 at 1:15 p.m., the dishwasher wash temperature was observes at 134°F, and the rinse temperature…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to transport and store linens to prevent contamination, remove and replace soiled furniture to prevent the spread of bacteria, and failed to implement a surveillance plan, for identifying, tracking, monitoring and/or reporting of infections, communicable diseases and outbreaks among residents and staff. This had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, and staff in the facility. Findings include: Furniture During interview on 8/28/23 at 7:17 p.m., anonymous resident (AR)-A stated staff said the facility would replace the communal living room leather furniture because it was all stained with urine. She stated the residents needed to sit on a towel or their clothes smelled like urine, and both the furniture and the room lighting were so dark it was hard to see what one could be sitting in. R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated she was severely cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance of one staff for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement a process for antibiotic review to determine appropriate indications, dosage, duration, and trends of antibiotic use and resistance. This had the potential to affect any residents who had infections requiring antibiotic use. Findings include: The Grand Avenue Residence Antibiotic Stewardship Monthly Log listed four occurrences where antibiotics were dispensed to residents from 1/1/23 through 8/31/23. The form included resident name, date, infection, antibiotic, completion date and outcome, but lacked evidence of review for appropriate antibiotic use and appropriate action taken. The 'Details Rxs and supplies categorized by therapeutic class and/or products' pharmacy report for the period 1/1/23 through 8/31/23, included 16 dispensed prescriptions for antibiotic/antibacterial medications. During interview on 9/1/23 at 9:33 a.m., director of nursing (DON) stated she was the infection preventionist for the building for the past year. She identified she did not have a report or log of all residents who had orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate side-effect monitoring (i.e. blood pressures [BP], involuntary movements) was completed for 3 of 5 residents (R1, R15, R17), failed to identify a duplicate as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication (drugs that affect a person's mental state) for 1 of 5 residents (R1), failed to ensure residents were reassessed for continued use of PRN antipsychotic medications (used for a variety of mental health disorders), beyond the 14 days for 3 of 5 residents (R1, R9, R15), failed to identify a possible drug allergy for 1 of 5 residents (R1), and failed to appropriately schedule administration of medication to treat orthostatic hypotension (a rapid drop in BP with change in position) for 1 of 5 residents (R15) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R1 - Monitoring of Orthostatic BP and Side Effects, Duplicate Antipsychotic Order, 14-day PRN, Allergy R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure written notice was sent to the resident and/or the resident's representatives after emergent transfer from the facility to the hospital for two residents (R5, R8) who were reviewed for hospitalization. Further, the facility failed to send a copy to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. The failure to provide the required written notices containing all required information places the residents at risk of involuntary transfer and/or not being informed of their rights, including how to appeal their transfer. Findings include: R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated she was cognitively intact. R5's progress note dated 8/22/2023 at 11:44 a.m., indicated she was transferred to the hospital for evaluation and treatment due to a change in medical condition. R5's medical record revealed no evidence a hospital transfer notice was provided to the resident. During interview on 8/28/23 at 6:44 p.m., R5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure each resident and/or responsible party was provided a written bed hold policy/notice at the time of each discharge for 2 of 2 resident (R5, R8) reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated she was cognitively intact. R5's progress note dated 8/22/2023 at 11:44 a.m., indicated she was transferred to the hospital for evaluation and treatment due to a change in medical condition. R5's progress note dated 8/24/23 at 12:09 p.m. indicated medical record specialist (MR) sent a copy of the bed hold policy directly to the hospital, one for the hospital chart and one for R5. R5's medical record revealed no evidence a bed hold policy/notice was provided to the resident. During interview on 8/28/23 at 6:44 p.m., R5 stated she recently went to the hospital via ambulance and indicated she did not receive any paperwork including a bed hold notice. R8's quarterly MDS dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-01 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to make a followup appointment for 1of 1 resident (R7) reviewed for vision received services to obtain assistive devices needed to maintain vision abilities. Findings include: R7's admission Record accessed 8/31/23 indicated R7 had a diagnosis of diabetes and bilateral myopia (difficulty seeing things at a distance). R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Annual assessment dated [DATE] indicated R7 was in need of corrective lenses. During an interview on 8/28/23 at 6:35 p.m., R7 stated they had been to an eye specialist several months ago and received a new lens prescription. R7 further stated they had been waiting to receive new glasses since at least May but had not received any new lenses or a notification from the facility about an appointment to pick up new glasses. A document in R7's medical record indicated R7 went to an optometrist on 4/17/23. During this visit, it was determined R7 needed a lens prescription change and received a recommendation for new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 residents (R6, R15) were offered or received the pneumococcal vaccine (PCV20) in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations. Findings include: R6's Medical Diagnosis list printed 8/31/23, indicated she was [AGE] years old and had diagnoses of Type 2 diabetes mellitus and nicotine dependence, and no allergies to vaccines or contraindications to the pneumococcal vaccine. R6's immunization documentation indicated she had one dose of PPSV 23 on 12/19/09, and another dose of PPSV 23 on 12/19/17. The CDC's PneumoRecs VaxAdvisor indicated for patients aged 19-64 who have not received PCV15 or PCV20, with a risk factor of Type 2 diabetes mellitus and nicotine dependence and had a PPSV23, Give one dose of PCV15 or PCV 20 at least one year after their last dose of PPSV23. If PCV 20 is used their vaccinations are complete. R15's Medical Diagnosis list printed 8/31/23, indicated she was [AGE] years old and had a diagnosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet per resident in three resident bedrooms (room numbers 101,102,103) affecting 9 of 19 residents (R15, R8, R13, R4, R9, R17, R2, R3, R7) whose bedrooms had less than the required square footage.Findings include:During observation on room [ROOM NUMBER] had three residents residing in the room and measured approximately 197.83 square feet of useable space or 65.9 square feet for each resident.During observation on room [ROOM NUMBER] had three residents residing in the room and measured approximately 239 square feet of useable floor space or 79.6 square feet for each resident.During observation room [ROOM NUMBER] had three residents residing in the room and measured approximately 220.71 square feet of useable floor space or 73.6 square feet for each resident.The rooms were observed to pose no safety hazards and were furnished adequately. There was no observable evidence R15, R8, R13, R4, R9, R17, R2, R3, R7 were negatively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet per resident in three resident bedrooms (room numbers 101,102,103) affecting 9 of 17 residents (R1, R12, R5, R9, R170, R3, R4) whose bedrooms had less than the required square footage. The facility's request for a continuing waiver of the following health deficiency has been forwarded to the CMS Region V Office. Approval of the waiver request has been recommended. Findings include: During observation on room [ROOM NUMBER] had three residents residing in the room and measured approximately 197.83 square feet of useable space or 65.9 square feet for each resident. During observation on room [ROOM NUMBER] had three residents residing in the room and measured approximately 239 square feet of useable floor space or 79.6 square feet for each resident. During observation room [ROOM NUMBER] had three residents residing in the room and measured approximately 220.71 square feet of useable floor space or 73.6 square feet for each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-09-01 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure three years of survey results/complaints were readily accessible. This had the potential to affect all 17 residents, their families and any visitors who may have wished to review the information. Findings include: During interview on 9/1/23 at 12:02 p.m., director of nursing stated she was unsure where the facility survey results were located and began to look on a shelf behind her desk in an office unavailable to the residents and their families. DON was unable to locate the binder but stated it should be available for review. During interview on 9/1/23 at 12:06 p.m., R3 stated she did not know where survey results were kept for resident and family review, and suggested asking the office staff. During interview on 9/1/23 at 12:08 p.m. registered nurse (RN)-A stated she normally worked at another site but thought the survey binder was located on the bottom of a table by the front door, however the table was not located where it once was. During observation on 9/1/23 at 12:15 p.m., the facility survey…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-09-01 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — widespreadKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure prompt (within 24 hours of postal delivery) delivery of mail to residents who received mail at the facility. This had the potential to affect all 17 residents (including R4, R5, R16, and an anonymous resident who stated mail was not delivered on Saturdays) residing at the facility who receive or have the potential to receive, personal mail. Findings include: On 8/30/23 a notice on the electronic health record system utilized by the facility directed staff not to handle resident mail, and indicated it was the job of the medical records specialist (MRS)-A only. During an interview on 8/31/23 at 1:14 p.m., R4, R5, R16 and another anonymous resident stated the facility only allowed a single employee to deliver mail to the residents. They further stated this employee was never here on Saturday, therefore they never had personal or business mail delivered to them on Saturday or Sunday. During an interview on 9/1/23 at 11:24 a.m., MRS-A stated for the previous three months, he has been the sole staff member who handled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-09-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the hallways, stairs, and main Livingroom carpet, the upstairs bathroom tiled floors, the dining room vinyl floors, the main bathroom, and furniture were kept in a clean and sanitary manner. Additionally, the facility failed to provide maintenance services to bathroom piping and kitchen windows that had peeling paint, dining room vinyl floors that were peeling up from the floor, and plastic baseboard siding in the bathroom peeling from the wall. This had the potential to affect all 17 residents within the facility reviewed for safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Findings include: Anonymous resident (AR)-A quarterly assessment Minimum Data Set (MDS) accessed on 9/1/23, identified intact cognition. R119's admission assessment MDS dated [DATE], identified intact cognition with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. R16's annual assessment MDS dated [DATE], identified intact cognition with a diagnosis of asthma. R1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet per resident in three resident bedrooms (room numbers 101,102,103) affecting 9 of 20 residents (R1, R3, R4, R5, R8, R10, R12, R15, R17) whose bedrooms had less than the required square footage. The facility's request for a continuing waiver of the following health deficiency has been forwarded to the CMS Region V Office. Approval of the waiver request has been recommended. Findings include: During observation on room [ROOM NUMBER] had three residents residing in the room and measured approximately 197.83 square feet of useable space or 65.9 square feet for each resident. During observation on room [ROOM NUMBER] had three residents residing in the room and measured approximately 239 square feet of useable floor space or 79.6 square feet for each resident. During observation room [ROOM NUMBER] had three residents residing in the room and measured approximately 220.71 square feet of useable floor space or 73.6 square feet for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-01 for 8 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in MN
CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 24E150. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.