No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lakehouse Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center

3737 Bryant Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55409 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 260 certified beds · (612) 827-5931 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (612) 827-5931 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Aug 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (81) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3952 S Lyndale Ave · (866) 948-6145 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1221 W Lake St · (612) 824-1036 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
826 W 36th St · (612) 823-1703 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3900 S Bryant Ave · (612) 370-4948 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased25.1%18.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.0%4.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%1.9%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%2.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.7%4.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%4.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.3%20.5%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.6%12.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.3%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.9%5.2%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.2%24.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.5%17.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.7%1.9%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.3%82.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.5%23.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.1%14.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.491.611.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.611.901.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 209 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
47.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 47.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 67 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.3%CMS range 50.7–64.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.0%CMS range 8.2–14.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge47.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge34.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 4.8–10.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.891.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.70
RN hours/ resident / day
0.71
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.94
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.34
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.58
RN hoursweekends
34.5%
Total nursing turnover
20.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 260 beds and averages 235.0 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-15)
23
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-01)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

81 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 70 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-03 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to follow the Provider Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for 1 of 3 residents (R1), who wished to have CPR in the event of cardiopulmonary arrest (absence of pulse and respirations). This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) when R1 was found absent of pulse and respirations, no CPR was initiated, and R1 passed away. The facility implemented corrective action prior to survey; therefore, the deficient practice was issued at past non-compliance. The IJ began on [DATE], when R1 was found unresponsive with an absence of pulse and respirations, CPR was not initiated, and R1 passed away. The facility administrator and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the IJ on [DATE] at 2:50 p.m. which was identified at the scope and severity of and isolated IJ. The facility implemented immediate corrective action on [DATE] to prevent recurrence, therefore, the IJ was issued at past…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided in accordance with professional standards of nursing practice for 1 of 1 residents (R1) when staff inserted a Foley catheter into a gastrostomy stoma without validated competency for the procedure, without completing appropriate clinical assessment to determine safety prior to insertion, and using improper technique, including inflation of the catheter balloon within the stoma. In addition, the facility failed to ensure feeding tube supplies were labeled according to professional standards to avoid the possibility of feeding tube complications and/or related infections for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for enteral tube feedingFindings include:R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had moderate cognitive impairment and required staff assistance with activities of daily living. R1 had a feeding tube and diagnoses which included stroke, hemiplegia or hemiparesis, heart failure, kidney disease,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure ordered hydration interventions were implemented for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for enteral tubes.Findings include:R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had moderate cognitive impairment and required staff assistance with activities of daily living. R1 had diagnoses which included stroke, hemiplegia or hemiparesis, heart failure, kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, aphasia, malnutrition, and respiratory failure. The MDS indicated R1 had a tube feeding which accounted for 51% (percent) or more of total calories R1 received and 501 cc/day (cubic centimeters per day; total volume of liquid per day) or more of average fluid intake per day.R1's nutrition care plan dated 4/24/26, indicated R1 was NPO (nothing by mouth; may not eat or drink) and required tube feeding related to dysphagia following CVA (cerebrovascular accident; blood flow to the brain is interrupted). The goal was to maintain adequate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) were followed for 1 of 1 resident (R1) when medication was administered via enteral tube. In addition, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices related to syringes and containers used for flushing enteral tubes for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R4) reviewed for enteral tubes. Findings include R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had moderate cognitive impairment and required staff assistance with activities of daily living. R1 had a feeding tube and diagnoses which included stroke, hemiplegia or hemiparesis, heart failure, kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, aphasia, malnutrition, and respiratory failure.R1's infection care plan revised 4/24/26, indicated R1 was at risk for infection due to gastric tube. The care plan directed staff to follow enhanced barrier precautions with all contact cares due to R1's gastric tube.During an observation on 4/29/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and document review, the facility failed to reassess a resident after a change in condition for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for quality of care. R1 was assessed after a change in condition about 12:00 a.m., slept through the night, and was not reassessed until a visiting family member requested R1 transfer to the hospital.Findings include: R1's Provider Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) dated 8/15/16, Indicated if R1 has no pulse and is not breathing instructions were do not resuscitate (DNR), do not intubate (DNI). When not in cardiopulmonary arrest follow sections in the B Goals for Treatment and C Interventions and Treatment area of the form. Section B indicated provide comfort care - do not intubate but use medication, oxygen, oral suction, and manual clearing of airways, etc. as needed for immediate comfort and in an emergency call the person listed. Section C had both boxes checked for oral and IV/IM antibiotics. R1's revised care plan dated 7/18/25, indicated he could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure individualized turning and repositioning programs were based on a completed comprehensive assessment in order to prevent or mitigate the risk of pressure ulcer development and/or deterioration for 1 of 3 resident (R2) reviewed for pressure ulcers.findings include R2's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R2 had impaired cognition with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, diabetes and cerebrovascular accident (stroke) and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs) including eating and mobility. R2 was incontinent of bowel and bladder, requiring staff to change incontinent product and perform peri care. R2 had no nutritional risk factors noted. R2 was at risk for PU but did not have a PU. Formal assessment was completed, but no clinical assessment was completed. R2 did not have a turning or reposition program.R2's Braden's assessment dated [DATE] with a score of 14 out of 18, putting R2 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    During observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure facility was kept sanitary and maintained in good repair on all six resident units which had the potential to affect all 225 residents, staff, and visitors of the facility.Findings include: Walls:During observation on 8/12/25 at 8:56 a.m., on the sixth floor, wall outside R184's room had gouges and underlying wallboard exposed. Partial repair was done but not painted to match the wall. The wall across from aviary was tan in color with nine sections or areas of wall covering four feet by two feet with repairs but no matching paint.During observation on 8/12/25 at 9:26 a.m., in second floor dining room, two residents were seated at a dining room table. The wall of the dining room had gouges and scrapes observed with repairs done but no paint to match the wall cover.During observation and interview with the administrator and director of environmental services (D)-ES on 8/13/25 at 8:31 a.m., on the seventh floor, the D-ES and surveyor observed knee wall in dining room with gouges and visible wallboard repaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was in place to eliminate fruit flies and black flies for 5 residents (R6, R69, R76, R88, and R223) who verbalized concern about flies. This had the potential to affect all 225 residents of the facility.Findings include:R6's admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R6 with no physical or verbal behaviors and did not reject cares, no impairment of upper extremity range of motion, impairment of lower extremity range of motion, utilized a wheelchair for mobility, and required assistance with toileting, and dressing.R69's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified R69 with intact cognition, no physical or verbal behaviors and did not reject cares, no impairment of upper or lower extremity range of motion, utilized a walker for mobility, and required set up or clean-up assistance with eating, oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, dressing, and personal hygiene.R76's admissions MDS dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all staff knocked on individual resident bedroom doors, introduced themselves, and waited for permission to enter room prior to entry for 9 of 9 residents (R69, R77, R106, R119, R146, R167, R178, R196, R252) reviewed for dignity.Findings include: R69's quarter Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R69 with intact cognition.R146's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified R146 with intact cognition.R252's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified R252 with impaired cognition.During observation on 8/11/25 at 1:15 p.m., staff entered R252's room after one knock and did not introduce self or wait for a response or permission to enter. Once the staff entered the room, she looked at surveyor and turned around and left the room without a word. R252 stated, they do that a lot. Don't wait to let me answer or tell me who they are and what they want. I don't like that at all. I think it is rude.During interview with R146 on 8/12/25 at 9:01 a.m., R146…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    During observation and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions to ensure residents' personal care information was kept secured and out of public view when stored on 3 of 7 facility units with mobile medication/treatment carts. This had the potential to affect 9 residents on the 2nd floor, 8 residents on the 5th floor, and 11 residents on the 7th floor whose personal information was listed on unattended care sheets.Findings include:During observation and interview starting on 8/13/25 at 8:21 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A left an unattended resident care sheet including thirteen resident names, room numbers, information on how they take their medications, bath information, and diagnoses and information on pressure ulcer status, assistance required for transfers and applying ordered adaptive equipment and infection control precautions. The form titled 7G ODD Nurse Census Sheet was left unattended on medication cart while two residents in wheelchairs were pushed past the cart by other staff members. LPN-A returned to cart and stated, [I] left the paper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurately coded with the potential for inaccurate federal reimbursement and resident care planning for 1 of 5 residents (R218) reviewed for MDS accuracy.Findings include:R218's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated R218 had memory problems and required assistance with personal cares. The MDS indicated under section N0350-A: Insulin injections. R218 received 7 insulin injections during the look-back period (LBP). R218's orders were reviewed and did not indicate orders for insulin, before or after LBP. R218 was diabetic and received two oral agents to treat her diabetes. R218's April and May's medication administration record indicated, R218 did not received insulin during LBP. During interview on 8/13/25 at 2:35 p.m., MDS coordinator verified R218 did not received insulin during LBP. MDS coordinator indicated probably the mistake was done when one of R218's oral diabetic medications was coded as insulin. MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 70 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a level I Pre-admission Screening (PAS) and, if needed, a Level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed to screen for mental health needs for 3 of 4 residents (R40, R9, R6) reviewed for PAS. Findings include: R40’s quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had intact cognition. The MDS indicated R40 was diagnosed with schizophrenia, post-traumatic stress disorder, and a “psychotic disorder”. R40's PAS notice dated 1/21/25, indicated a copy of the PAS was included with this notice, but the PAS was not final until the lead agency sent a final determination to the nursing home. R40's entire medical record was reviewed and lacked evidence that a final determination had been received. During an interview with the director of admissions (DOA) on 8/13/25 at 9:26 a.m., the final PAS was requested, and the DOA confirmed she would review R40’s medical record and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to ensure correct application of a lower extremity brace for 1 of 3 residents (R178) reviewed for the use of a lower extremity brace. Findings include: R178's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R178 had severely impaired cognition, a functional limitation in the range of motion of both lower extremities, and required staff assistance with all activities of daily living. R178's diagnosis report dated 5/21/25, indicated R178 had a diagnosis of right-sided weakness following a stroke.R178's Medical Record Attestation Statement Delayed Certification Statement dated 7/2/25, indicated the provider instructed staff to continue to apply the right AFO brace as R178 tolerated. The statement included no further instructions for brace use. R178's care plan dated 7/3/25, order report dated 8/8/25, and tasks dated 8/13/25, were reviewed and did not include R178's use of a right lower extremity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update the plan of care 1 of 1 resident (R154) observed for position and mobility. In addition, the facility failed to revise and update a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 1 resident (R222) who had a history of resident-to-resident incidents. Findings include: R154’s quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified mild cognitive impairment, used a wheelchair, and had impairments on one side to upper and lower extremities. The MDS lacked identification of an adaptive device such as a brace or ankle-foot orthosis (AFO). R154’s orders from admission through 8/15/25 were reviewed and lacked orders for the use of an adaptive device such as a brace or AFO. R154’s occupational therapy and physical therapy evaluations and treatment plans dated 5/6/23, lacked documentation pertaining to an AFO. R154’s provider visit dated 5/8/23, indicated an initial assessment and plan of care related to a history of stroke, and identified R154’s left side was flaccid and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure routine personal hygiene (i.e., nail care) was completed and provided to reduce the risk of complication (i.e., infection, skin scratches) for 1 of 1 residents (R87) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) and who were dependent on staff for their care. Findings include: R87's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/14/25, identified R87 had moderately impaired cognition with physical behavioral symptoms (hitting, kicking, pushing, scratching, grabbing, abusing others sexually) occurring 1-3 days that do not put resident at significant risk for physical illness or injury and do not significantly interfere with resident's care or participation in activities or social interactions. MDS identified rejection of care was noted 1-3 days during look-back period and there were no changes in behavioral symptoms since last MDS assessment. MDS identified R87 was dependent on staff assistance for shower/bathing needs and required setup/cleanup assistance from staff for personal hygiene needs.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a therapeutic recreation assessment was addressed in the electronic medical record (EMR) and care planned to ensure a resident was offered appropriate activities for engagement while at the care facility for 1 of 2 residents (R76) reviewed for activities. Findings include:R76 's admission Minimal Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R76 was admitted to the care center on 7/22/25 and was cognitively intact. R76's Activity Interview for Daily and Activity Preferences, dated 7/24/25, included a question How important is it to you to listen to music you like? which indicated R76 answered Very ImportantR76's Therapeutic Rec/Life enrichment Assessment, dated 7/24/25, which had boxes to fill in resident information such as past work experience/professions, religious preferences and current or past interest and hobbies, was left blank with will enter info 7/26/25 typed in to the first blank box of the assessment. A completed paper form…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement interventions to ensure hearing aids were routinely applied or offered daily for 1 of 1 resident (R20) reviewed who had severe hearing loss. Findings include: R20's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R20 with intact cognition, did not reject cares, required hearing aids, and diagnoses of paralysis due to a stroke affecting his non dominant side, hepatitis, seizures, anxiety, and depression.R20's care plan (CP) dated 5/1/25, identified HEARING LOSS: Resident has bilateral hearing loss with Goal of Staff to assist res with placement of hearing aids in bilateral ear.During observation and interview with R20 on 8/11/25 at 1:38 p.m., R20 was lying in bed without hearing aids. R20 asked State Surveyor several times to speak louder. R20 stated he did not know where his hearing aids were. R20 stated, I need to have my hearing aids to hear. No one told me where they are.During interview with nursing assistant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents had received ordered meals to increase calorie intake and weight per provider orders for 1 of 5 resident (R214) reviewed for nutrition and weight loss.Findings include:R214's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified R214 had intact cognition with no hallucinations, delusions, behaviors or rejection of care present. R214 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL's) and needed assistance from staff for set up/clean-up for eating. Pertinent medical diagnoses included traumatic brain dysfunction, quadriplegia (a medical condition described as paralysis of all four limbs), diabetes melilites (DM), osteoporosis, cerebrovascular accident (CVA--a sudden interruption of blood supply to the brain that caused brain cells to be deprived of oxygen and nutrients which led to brain damage, loss of function or death), seizure disorder, and malnutrition. R214 had one, stage three and one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to follow care planned interventions to prevent re-traumatization for 1 of 1 resident (R6) reviewed for trauma informed care who was diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder and had identified triggers.Findings include: R6's admission Minimal Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R6 admitted to the care center on 6/25/25 and had multiple medical conditions including anxiety, major depressive disorder, bipolar, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), schizophrenia and traumatic brain injury. R6's brief interview for mental status (BIMS) assessment, dated 7/1/25, indicated R6 was cognitively intact. R6's trauma history assessment, dated 7/1/25, identified R6 had a history of sexual abuse by males at a young age and could not be in the same room as another male with the door closed. R6's care plan, dated 7/1/25, indicated R6 reported childhood sexual abuse at the hands of two older males, making him distrust the majority of males he has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure medication errors were prevented for 2 of 2 residents (R138, R30) observed during medication administration. This resulted in a medication error rate of 7.14% (percent) with two errors out of 28 opportunities. Findings include:R138R138's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition and diagnoses of anemia, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, hypertension, hyponatremia, hyperlipidemia, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and malnutrition. The MDS indicated R138 had a feeding tube.R138's provider order dated 5/6/25, indicated R138 required potassium chloride (used to treat and prevent low potassium levels in the body) ER (extended-release) 10 mEq (milliequivalents) via PEG-tube (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube; a tube passed into the stomach through the abdominal wall) one time a day with instructions to dissolve in water.During observation and interview on 8/13/25 at 8:14 a.m., licensed practical nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure identified dental concerns (i.e., need for dentures) were acted upon and, if needed, referred to the appropriate resource in a timely manner for 1 of 2 residents (R87) reviewed who voiced dental concerns.R87's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/14/25, identified R87 had moderately impaired cognition. Further, the MDS identified a section labeled, L0200, along with spaces to record no natural teeth or tooth fragments(s) (edentulous). This was answered, None of the above were present. Further, R87's Clinical Census report, printed 8/14/25, identified R87's current payor source listed as, Medicaid MN.During an interview on 8/11/25 at 1:52 p.m., R87 stated, I don't have any dentures, and I want to wear dentures. R87 explained the facility was supposed to make arrangements for getting her dentures but that was a long time ago. Furthermore, R87 stated he was limited on what he can eat due to not having teeth/dentures.R87's care plan, printed 8/14/25, identified R87 was independent with oral care, had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 resident (R9, R105) received ordered therapeutic diet to maintain or improve their nutritional status.Findings include: R9R9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R9 had intact cognition with no hallucinations, delusions, behaviors or rejection of care present. R9 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL's) to include set up assistance for eating. R9's MDS assessment documented height as 76 inches and 171 pounds and was triggered for weight loss. Pertinent medical diagnoses include traumatic brain injury, coronary artery disease (CAD), malnutrition, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and hyponatremia. R9 had one stage four pressure ulcer present upon admission.R9's provider orders indicated on 11/12/24, a therapeutic diet of regular texture, thin consistency, for double portions all meals, cut into bite sized pieces was ordered.R9's Medical Diagnosis list included moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was used for 2 of 7 residents (R3, R12) when providing care for residents in enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Findings include: The CDC article titled Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs), dated 4/2/24, indicated that MDRO transmission in skilled nursing facilities was common and contributed to substantial resident morbidity. EBP is an infection control intervention to reduce transmission of MDROs by using gowns and gloves during high contact resident care activities. The article indicated high-contact activities include providing hygiene, changing briefs, dressing, urinary catheter care, transferring, etc. The article indicated that EBP should be implemented (when contact precautions did not apply) for residents with indwelling medical devices (urinary catheter) or chronic wounds, regardless of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a rapid weight gain for resident with diagnosis of Congestive Heart Failure (CHF)(one warning sign of CHF is rapid weight gain which could indicate fluid buildup in the body) and failed to contact physician to receive clarification on orders for 1 of 3 resident (R1) who was admitted to the facility without weight and notification parameters related to CHF diagnosis.Findings Include:R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified an admission of 6/27/25, intact cognition and a medical diagnosis of CHF.R1's physician order dated 6/27/25 identified R1's indicated to weigh R1 for 1 day, then weekly for 4 weeks then monthly.R1's hospital discharge weight was 188 pounds (lbs.) on 6/27/25.R1's recorded daily weights at the facility were as follows:-6/27/25 194 lbs.-6/29/25 192 lbs.-7/2/25 197 lbs. and199 lbs.-7/3/25 197 lbs.-7/4/25 200 lbs.-7/7/25 207 lbs.R1's Nurse Practitioner visit notes dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan which provided effective and person-centered care direction to meet professional standards of care for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of congested heart failure (CHF). Additionally, the facility failed to implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for 1 of 3 (R1) reviewed. Findings include:R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified an admission of 6/27/25, intact cognition and a medical diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF).R1's physician order dated 6/27/25 identified R1's indicated to weigh R1 for 1 day, then weekly for 4 weeks then monthly.R1's baseline care plan dated 6/30/25, indicated Focus Cardiovascular: the resident has impaired cardia output due to diagnosis of CHF. Interventions listed as:-monitor vital signs and notify MD of significant abnormalities.-Lab work.-Weight monitoring dailyR1's Baseline care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to provide comprehensive nursing care to meet acceptable standards of clinical practice for 1 of 3 resident (R1) who was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF) and no clarification for daily weight and notification parameters were requested to ensure adequate medical care. This resulted in a 13-pound (lbs.) weight gain in ten days. Findings include:The National Institute of Health (NIH) (.gov)Nursing ManagementThe nursing care plan for patients with HF should include:Relieving fluid overload symptomsRelieving symptoms of anxiety and fatiguePromoting physical activityIncreasing medication complianceDecreasing adverse effects of treatmentTeaching patients about dietary restrictionsTeaching patient about self-monitoring of symptomsTeaching patients about daily weight monitoring When To Seek HelpPrompt assessment by the medical team is indicated in the following situations:Worsening symptoms of fluid overloadWorsening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to timely change end of life wishes in the medical record to ensure the advanced directive (a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) was followed for 1 of 3 resident's (R1) reviewed for advanced directives. Findings include: R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had severe cognitive impairment and diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure, diabetes, malnutrition, intellectual disabilities, and adult failure to thrive. R1's care plan dated [DATE], indicated R1 required assistance with all decision making, and was signed by R1's legal guardian and R1's physician. R1's Provider Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form dated [DATE], indicated full code (receive all possible life-saving measures in the event of the event the resident stops breathing or heart stops) and was signed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to accurately document new or changed medication orders for 2 out of 3 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for medical records. R1's seizure medication was changed from tablet form to oral solution, but the tablet form was not discontinued, which resulted in R1 being administered two doses. In addition, R2 did not receive three medications when he returned from a hospitalization resulting in missed doses of medication required for his liver disease and diabetes. Findings include: R1's medication order dated 12/14/24, indicated Levetiracetam 1000 milligram (mg) tablet two times a day. R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated he had prostate cancer, high blood pressure, diabetes, dementia, impaired cognition related to a stroke and epilepsy. He required staff assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLS). He was admitted for Hospice (end of life care) respite (short stay when their caregiver was unable to care for them) care from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide ensure that 1 of 3 residents (R1) received treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice. R1 was discharged from the hospital with identified sores on his lower legs and the facility did not provide any cares for three days to his legs. Findings include: R1's care plan dated 8/22/24 indicated R1 had a potential for impaired skin integrity related to decreased mobility, incontinence, anticoagulation therapy, diabetes type II and predisposing disease. R1's interventions were: -Encourage good nutrition and hydration to promote healthier skin dated 8/22/24. -Avoid scratching and keep hands and body parts from excessive moisture, keep fingernails short dated 8/22/24. -Keep skin clean and dry revision date of 10/15/24 -Apply Mepilex border dressing to coccyx area to prevent skin breakdown over body prominences dated 10/23/24. -Wear padded boots when in bed to protect heels from breakdown dated 10/23/24. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-14 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure an assessment for self-administration of medications (SAM) was completed for 1 of 3 (R2) residents reviewed for self-administration of medications. Findings include: R2's admission Record dated 6/30/23, indicated R2's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, respiratory failure with hypercapnia, weakness, essential tremor, gastro-esophageal reflux disease and major depressive disorder. R2's care plan dated 4/21/24 indicated staff to administer medication as ordered/observe for side effects and effectiveness, and assess her ability to safely self-administer medications specified on admission/re-admission, quarterly, review each medication as necessary with the resident. R2's Physician Orders dated 8/23/24 at 3:54 p.m. indicated R2 had been assessed and deemed safe to self-administer ipratropium 0.5 milligram (mg)-albuterol 3 mg/milliliter (ml) nebulization inhaler (medication used to ease breathing) after nursing set up. The physician order lacked evidence of self-administration of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure laundered linens were handled and sorted in a clean, sanitary environment to reduce the risk of contamination for 1 of 1 main washrooms reviewed; failed to ensure staff consistently implemented transmission-based (TBP) and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) to reduce the risk of infectious spread for 4 of 4 residents (R134, R83, R54 and R2); and failed to ensure general COVID-19 mitigation methods (i.e., masking) were correctly and consistently implemented on units with active infection. These findings have potential for a cumulative effect and, as a result, have potential to affect all 228 residents, staff and visitors within the care center. Findings include: Laundry Room: On 7/30/24 at 8:21 a.m., a tour of the campus main washroom was completed with laundry aide (LA)-A present. The washroom consisted of a large single space with commercial washing machines on one side, and three [NAME] commercial dryers on the opposite. In the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for 6 of 6 residents (R18, R15, R53, R142, R208, R386 ) who were seated at the dining room table with other residents who were served meals without being served meals themselves resulting in them waiting for their meals while tablemates dined and for 1 of 1 resident (R386) who was brought to the dining room ungroomed in a hospital gown. In addition, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for 1 of 1 (R164) observed for lack of clothing in bed. Findings include: Dining R203's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R203 was cognitively intact. During an interview on 7/29/24 at 1:51 p.m., R203 stated food trays would often sit out in a serving cart waiting to be served to residents for over 30 minutes, often causing food to be served cold and past scheduled mealtimes. During observation on 7/31/24 at 7:30 a.m., R53 and R208 were sitting out in the main dining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure vinyl floors were clean and in good condition for 2 of 5 resident dining rooms (2nd floor memory care unit and 3rd floor) and 1 of 1 (R134) resident rooms reviewed for environment. Findings include: R134's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated , 7/20/24 documented R134 with severe impairment of cognitive skills, physical and verbal symptoms directed towards others, had an indwelling catheter. In addition, R134 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, seizures, depression, anemia, renal insufficiency (decreased kidney function), neurogenic bladder (disruption of the nervous system and the bladder) and obstructive uropathy (difficulty voiding). Also, R134 required extensive assistance of one staff member with bed mobility, eating, toilet use and required setup or clean-up assistance with oral hygiene. R134's Profile in the electronic medical record (EMR) listed family member (FM-A) as Responsible Party, primary Emergency Contact, Power of Attorney, Care Conference Person, Essential Caregiver, Financial Responsibility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure routine personal care and hygiene (i.e., bathing, nail care, hair combing) was offered and/or completed for 5 of 6 residents (R39, R184, R134, R179, R383) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) and who required staff assistance to complete such care. Findings include: R39 R39's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R39 had moderate cognitive impairment, demonstrated no delusional thinking, and was not diabetic. On 7/29/24 at 2:01 p.m., R39 was observed seated in his electric wheelchair while in his room. R39 had visibly long fingernails present on both hands, and the edge of the nail being multiple millimeters (mm) long on several nails with a dark-colored substance present underneath multiple nail edges. R39 was interviewed and stated the bathing he was provided at the care center was usually inadequate adding, [They] spray you a little bit and call it done. R39 stated the poor bathing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure mediations were kept locked or under direct observation of authorized staff in areas where residents, staff and guests could access medications on 3 of 5 resident floors. Findings include: During observation and interview on 7/29/24 at 6:14 p.m., an unattended and unlocked medication cart was observed located along a knee-high wall facing the seventh floor dining room during mealtime. Registered nurse (RN)-A returned to the medication cart and verified it was unlocked and, it should be locked to stop anyone from getting in. During observation and interview on 7/31/24 at 1:10 p.m., an unattended and unlocked medication cart was observed located along a knee wall facing the fifth floor dining room with 12 seated residents in wheelchairs and walkers and two residents in wheelchairs rolling past the cart. During interview with licensed practical nurse (LPN)-B stated he was responsible for the unlocked medication cart and stated, I should always lock the cart when I leave it. Because the residents can get access to it.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure food was delivered and served in a timely manner to preserve desired temperatures of food for 3 of 3 residents (R158, R39 and R146) reviewed for dining. This had the potential to affect all residents of facility that received meal trays. Findings include: During survey initial kitchen tour on 7/29/24 at 11:57 a.m., the kitchen supervisor (KS) provided surveyor with printed copy of the document Mealtimes with three columns. First column identified meals and units. The other two columns identified, Dietary Starts: and Cart Arrives on Site: There was notation at bottom of form stating, Note: Meal delivery times may vary by 10 minutes from posted schedule and was documented as below. Meal Times: Cart Arrives on Site BREAKFAST: 2R: 7:15 AM 3G: 7:30 AM 2G: 7:45 AM 7G: 8:00 AM 5G: 8:15 AM 6G: 8:30 AM LUNCH: 2R: 11:15 AM 3G: 11:30 AM 2G: 11:45 AM 7G: 12:00 PM 5G: 12:15 PM 6G: 12:30 PM DINNER: 2R: 4:45 PM 3G: 5:00 PM 2G: 5:15 PM 7G: 5:30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure all food items were properly covered when served to residents to reduce and/or prevent the risk of food borne illness. This practice had the potential to affect all residents who received their meals from the kitchen. Findings include: During observation and interview on 7/29/24 at 6:00 p.m., nursing assistant (NA)-N poured beverages into cups and mugs and placed on multiple meal trays which were on an uncovered cart. Uncovered cheesecake desserts were also on the individual meal trays. NA-N wheeled the uncovered cart from the dining room down the hall and passed the meal trays to at least six individuals in their rooms pushing the cart further down the hall between rooms. NA-N stated the beverages came up to the sixth floor in covered pitchers and could be poured into cups in the dining room and taken uncovered to residents' rooms. During observation and interview on 7/31/24 at 9:12 a.m., NA-P wheeled an uncovered cart passing meal trays on the sixth floor which had uncovered bowels of cereal, brown sugar, milk, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement an effective pest control program to eliminate bed bugs from the building for 1 of 1 resident (R9) with the potential to affect all 11 residents residing on the odd side of the seventh floor. Findings include: R9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R9 had no cognitive deficits and required moderate assistance with transferring, bathing, and toileting hygiene. The pest control company report dated 7/31/24 at 2:15 p.m., indicated R9's original room had been assessed by the pest control company, and a dead bed bug was noted. During an interview on 7/29/24 at 2:09 p.m., R9 stated she was moved from her original room to her current room last week because of a bed bug infestation. R9 stated she was supposed to move back to her old room soon but was scared as she didn't believe that the bed bugs were gone. During an interview and observation on 7/30/24 at 2:55 p.m., R9 was found still residing in the new room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a self-administration of medications (SAM) assessment was completed to allow a resident to safely self-administer medications for 1 of 1 (R184) residents reviewed for self-administration of medications. Findings include: R184's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R184 had moderate cognitive impairment, didn't have signs of delirium, and didn't refuse cares or medications. The MDS indicated R184 was dependent with showers, lower body dressing, toileting, bed mobility, and transfers. R184 needed substantial assistance with upper body dressing, oral hygiene and eating. R184's Clinical diagnosis record printed 1/31/24, indicated diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following unspecified cerebrovascular disease (condition that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain), gastrostomy status (surgical procedure that creates an opening in the abdomen and into the stomach, allowing for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a written notice of transfer was sent to the office of the Ombudsman for long term care for 2 of 4 residents (R60, R27) reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: R60 R60's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R60 with diagnoses of a stroke with paralysis affecting the right dominant side, renal insufficiency, urinary tract infection, diabetes, and an unhealed pressure ulcer to right heel. R60's electronic medical record (EMR) section titled Profile identified primary emergency contact, power of attorney (POA), care conference person, and financial responsibility person as emergency contact (EC)-A. R60's Progress Notes (PN) tab, the notes are listed in vertical columns titled, Effective Date, Type, Note, Care Plan Item or Task, Dept, Shift Report, 24 Hour Report. R60's PN from licensed practical nurse (LPN)-D, dated 4/23/24 at 10:24 p.m. documented, Note Text: Resident send to HCMC ER at 2130. PN on 4/23/24 at 10:28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was completed prior to admission for 1 of 1 residents (R63). Findings include: R63's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R63 had intact cognition. R63's medical diagnoses list dated 4/19/24, indicated R63 was diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition that is marked hallucinations, delusions, and mood disorder symptoms, such as depression, mania) R63's PASARR dated 10/12/23, indicated the PAS [PASARR] is not final until the lead agency sends the documentation to the nursing facility. R63's entire medical record was reviewed and lacked evidence a final determination had been received by the county or managed care program as directed by the PAS. During an interview on 7/31/24 at 8:43 a.m., the director of social services (SW)-A stated after reviewing R63's preadmission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure timeliness of person-centered care conferences for 3 of 5 residents (R9, R103, R134) reviewed for care conferences. R9 R9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R9 was admitted on [DATE], and had no cognitive deficits. A review of R9's medical record indicated R9's last care conference was on 2/1/24 and did not demonstrate that a care conference occurred after 2/1/24 or a reason this would not have been practicable for R9. During an interview on 7/29/24 at 2:21 p.m., R9 stated she didn't remember having a care conference with facility staff since the beginning of the year and wished she had been more updated and involved in her care. During an interview on 7/30/24 at 3:04 p.m., social worker (SW)-B stated the social work department had gone through a lot of turnover and there was a backlog of care conferences. SW-B stated after reviewing R9's medical record it looked like R9 should have had a care conference to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to develop proactive interventions to promote appropriate bowel function and decrease the risk for discomfort or further complications for 1 of 1 resident (R9) reviewed for bowel management. In addition, the facility failed to transcribe prescription orders for 1 of 1 (R78) reviewed for non-pressure related skin breakdown. Findings include: R9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R9 had no cognitive deficits and required moderate assistance with transferring, bathing, and toileting hygiene. The MDS indicated R9 always had bowel incontinence and a toileting program was not currently being used. R9's medical diagnoses dated 3/22/24, indicated R9 was diagnosed with diabetes, bilateral lower extremity ulcers, respiratory failure, heart failure, kidney disease, and chronic pain syndrome. R9's care plan dated 3/22/24 indicated the resident had bowel incontinence with decreased physical functioning. R9's care plan included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure orders for an audiology referral were acted upon in a timely manner to promote better hearing and quality of life for 1 of 2 residents (R39) reviewed who expressed difficulty with hearing. Findings include: R39's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R39 had moderate cognitive impairment but demonstrated no delusional thinking. Further, the MDS identified R39 had adequate hearing (i.e., no difficulty in normal conversation) and did not use hearing aids. On 7/29/24 at 1:56 p.m., R39 was interviewed. R39 stated his hearing seemed to be getting worse as of late and added, The wax has gotta get cleaned out of my ears. R39 stated nobody from the care center had asked him about his hearing and wished they would so he could get new hearing aides. R39 stated he thought an audiology appointment was set-up with the VA (Veterans Administration) but was not adding, I sure wish they'd get it set up. R39's Nursing Assessment -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 residents (R195) with repeated falls had implemented interventions to promote safety and reduce the risk of falls. Findings include: R195's admission minimum data set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R195 had diagnoses including cerebral infarct (stoke), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), and hemiparesis (unable to fully use one side of the body), history of falling with injuries and muscle weakness. Further, R195 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. R195's care plan indicated he was at risk for falls with history of falls related to unsteady gait, cognitive deficits, and syncope. Interventions included R195's call light should be within reach, and to provide a safe environment. R195's physical device assessment, dated 7/25/24, indicated R195 required a perimeter mattress (a mattress that creates a raised edge to decrease falls from bed). Additionally, the medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively reassess to determine what, if any, additional interventions with pain management were needed for 1 of 3 residents (R39); and failed to assessed and develop non-pharmacological interventions to promote comfort for 2 of 3 residents (R69, R131) reviewed for pain management. Findings include: R39 R39's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R39 had moderate cognitive impairment but demonstrated no delusional thinking. The MDS outlined R39 consumed scheduled pain medication and had pain on an almost constant basis during the review period. R39's most recent Pain Interview 23 - V1, dated 6/5/24, identified R39 received schedule pain medication but no as-needed (PRN) or non-pharmacological interventions for pain. The evaluation outlined R39 reported pain almost constantly which occasionally affected his sleep. The pain was listed as being rated, 9, along with Moderate. The evaluation concluded,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure direct-care nursing staff were appropriately trained and competent in the use of a external ventilator machine used for 1 of 1 resident (R17) who used the machine on overnight hours and had significant respiratory disease/impairment. Findings include: R17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R17 had intact cognition along with several medical conditions including heart failure, Parkinson's Disease, seizure disorder, respiratory failure, and chronic lung disease (i.e., asthma, COPD). On 7/29/24 at 2:31 p.m., R17 was observed seated in an electric wheelchair while in her room with oxygen in place via a nasal cannula. R17 had a hospital-style bed placed next to the wall and adjacent to the bed was a [NAME] Respironics Trilogy 100 machine (a portable, external ventilator) positioned on a vertical stand with a nasal mask (i.e., nasal port with strap to secure around head) attached and draped over the device. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure consulting pharmacist recommendations were fully addressed or acted upon for 1 of 5 residents (R164) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R164's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R164 had severely impaired cognition. R164's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R164 did not speak and rarely/never understood verbal content. In addition, R164 was dependent on staff for bed mobility, lower body dressing, and toileting hygiene. R164's medical diagnoses report dated 1/27/23, indicated R164 had dementia without behavioral disturbance, epilepsy, and depression. R164's Order Summary Report dated 3/30/23, included an order dated 3/30/23 for 12.5 milligrams (mg) of quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication) every evening for agitation. The report included an order dated 6/21/24, with no end date for one mg of as-needed lorazepam (a psychotropic medication used to treat seizures) that could be given every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to have an indication for use and resident specific target behaviors while taking antipsychotic medications for 1 of 5 residents (R383) reviewed for unnecessary medications. In addition, the facility failed to ensure as-needed antipsychotic medications were limited to 14 days of use or given a specific duration of therapy to ensure necessity and reduce the risk of complication for 1 of 5 residents (R164) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. In addition, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication was given for continued antipsychotic medication for 1 of 5 residents (R164) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: R383's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R383 was cognitively intact and had received an antipsychotic medication during the seven-day look back period. R383's Orders, dated 7/18/24, indicated an order for Olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication used to treat mental disorders,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than 5 percent (%). Twenty medication administration errors occurred out of 31 opportunities resulting in a 64.52% medication error rate for 2 of 4 residents (R184 and R376). Findings include: R184's admission assessment Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R184 had moderate cognitive impairment, didn't have signs of delirium, and didn't refuse cares or medications. MDS indicated R184 was dependent with showers, lower body dressing, toileting, bed mobility, and transfers. R184 needed substantial assistance with upper body dressing, oral hygiene and eating. R184's Clinical diagnosis record printed 1/31/24, indicated diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following unspecified cerebrovascular disease (condition that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain), gastrostomy status (surgical procedure that creates an opening in the abdomen and into the stomach,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure routine dental services were provided or offered to promote oral hygiene and reduce the risk of complication (i.e., chewing issues, cavities) for 4 of 4 residents (R39, R50, R134, R179) reviewed for dental services. Findings include: R39 R39's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R39 admitted to the care center in April 2024 and had moderate cognitive impairment but demonstrated no delusional thinking. Further, the MDS section labeled, Section L - Oral/Dental Status, outlined spaces to record if R39 had broken or loose-fitting dentures, abnormal mouth tissue, or obvious tooth cavities but the section was answered, Z. None of the above were present. R39's Census listing, printed 7/31/24, identified R39 current payer source recorded as, Veterans Administration. On 7/29/24 at 1:54 p.m., R39 was observed seated in his wheelchair while in his room. R39 was interviewed, and expressed he had little to no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure drinks of preference were offered or served to promote adequate fluid intake and improve meal satisfaction for 1 of 2 residents (R39) reviewed who expressed their preferences of meal items were not honored. Findings include: R39's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R39 had moderate cognitive impairment but demonstrated no delusional thinking during the review period. On 7/29/24 at 1:42 p.m., R39 was observed in his electric wheelchair while in his room. R39 had a meal tray present on his bedside dresser which had a coffee cup filled with coffee and a white Styrofoam cup filled with a dark-red colored juice. R39 expressed multiple complaints about the care center meal service and food quality, and stated he wished they'd serve him milk with meals instead of that red crap as he pointed to the cup on his meal tray. R39 stated he had repeatedly asked for milk with meals but added, I ask them for milk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure recommended pneumococcal immunizations, as outlined by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), were offered and/or provided in a timely manner to reduce the risk of severe disease for 2 of 5 residents (R158, R17) reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: A CDC Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults feature, dated 3/2023, identified several tables with corresponding recommendations when to receive various versions (i.e., PPSV23, PCV13, PCV20) of the pneumococcal vaccine. The graph labeled, Adults 19-[AGE] years old with chronic health conditions ., identified persons who received only a PPSV23 had an option to either get a PCV15 or PCV20 a year after the last PPSV23 dose. The conditions listed including alcoholism and cigarette smoking. Further, The graph labeled, Adults [at or older than] [AGE] years old, outlined persons with a complete series of pneumococcal vaccination (i.e., PCV13 at any age, PPSV23 at or above [AGE] years old) should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-10 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide interpretive services for 1 of 3 residents (R1) to ensure the resident was fully informed in his primary language the risks and benefits, treatment plan and alternative options to treat diabetes when he ate snacks and refused insulin therapy. Findings included: During observation on 6/5/24 at 10:37 a.m. witness two staff knock on R1's door and enter his room. Observed the two staff standing with R1 in front of his open closet. Unable to understand what R1 told them. One of the staff members was holding a bag of snacks in a plastic bag and left the room. During observation and interview on 6/5/24 at 11:05 a.m., while talking to NP-A in the hallway R1 exited his room and saw writer talking to NP-A. Unable to understand what he was saying he looked at me and pointed at the LPN-C who was holding the bag of sweets and said, show her. He appeared agitated by pacing back and forth and kept looking at me and telling LPN-C show her. LPN-C…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations interviews and record review the facility failed to use an interpreter during the admission process when the resident's bill of rights was presented for 1 of 3 residents (R1). Staff identified a resident's code status was a factor to let a resident exercise their right to refuse care. Findings included: R1's care plan dated 12/18/23 indicated his preferred language was Somali but he could speak some English. No interventions to improve communication was listed. R1's minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had moderately impaired cognition, cognitive communication deficit (the inability to pay attention to a conversation, stay on topic, and remember the information presented), depression, and rejected cares from staff one to three times a week. Medical history included metabolic encephalopathy (when diabetes caused impaired brain function), diabetes, severe protein calorie malnutrition, adult failure to thrive, dementia with behavioral disturbances. The assessment determined he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to understand cultural practice, medical history, and diabetic goals for 1-3 residents (R1) when he refused to follow a diabetic diet and develop strategies to encourage him to take insulin for elevated blood sugar levels. Findings included: R1's care plan dated 12/18/23, indicated his preferred language was Somali and he could speak some English. The facility failed to identify staff interventions to enhance his understanding the medical provider's current diabetic treatment plan along with strategies to encourage compliance. R1's minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had moderately impaired cognition, depression, and rejected cares from staff one to three times a week. Medical history included cognitive communication deficit (the inability to pay attention to a conversation, stay on topic, and remember the information presented,) metabolic encephalopathy (when diabetes caused impaired brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify the family of one of six residents (R4) reviewed when R4 had an unwitnessed fall, an unrelated injury, and a change in cognition requiring hospitalization. Findings include: R4's care plan dated 12/27/23 indicated R4 was at risk for falls and included interventions to reduce fall risks. Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], for R4's admission to the facility indicated he was admitted on [DATE]. R4's functional assessment indicated he required minimal standby assistance with ambulating and did not use a wheelchair or scooter. R4's scored a 12 on his Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating he was moderately cognitively intact. R4's relevant diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, and a surgical encounter for repair of a perforated duodenal ulcer. An Un-witnessed fall report, dated 1/14/24 at 9:30 p.m., indicated R4 was found in the floor of his room after he had been assisted to bed. The report indicated R4 believed he had to get…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to reasonable needs and preferences for 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed. R1's remote control for her bed was taken away leaving her dependent on staff for bed mobility. This practice limited R1 in achieving independent functioning and impaired her dignity. R1 was her own decision maker. Finding include: Upon observation and interview on 3/8/24 at 9:37 a.m. R1 was seated in her wheelchair fully dressed and groomed. R1 stated, the staff took her bed remote control away. R1 stated she had never fallen at the facility and was able to use the remote appropriately. Nursing assistant (NA)-A gave R1 her television remote control. R1 turned on her television, changed the channels and used the volume button appropriately. R1 stated she can use the bed remote just as she is able to use the television remote. R1 stated she needed to have the bed remote due to back pain because she liked to lift the head of her bed up and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to document in the resident record the reinserting of an indwelling catheter for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for urinary incontinence. R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R3 had mildly impaired cognition, and an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine). R3's Diagnoses List indicated diagnoses included left hip fracture, diabetes mellitus type 2, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anemia (low iron), and dysphagia (trouble swallowing). R3's Physician Orders dated 1/4/24 directed to remove the indwelling catheter on 1/4/24, do a post void residual (PVR, a scan of the bladder after voiding to determine the amount of urine remaining in the bladder) every shift, straight cath (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine that is removed immediately after bladder is drained) if PVR is greater than 350 milliliters (ml), and if straight cathed more than three times, on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to transfer 1 of 3 residents (R1) safely when staff were observed using a two person transfer with gait belt and the resident was assessed and care planned for the use of a mechanical lift transfer. Findings include: R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 had severe impaired cognition, moderately impaired vision, minimal difficulty hearing, unclear speech, and no behaviors. R1 had no impairment on upper or lower extremities and used walker and wheelchair for mobility. R1 required partial to moderate assistance with eating meals, oral hygiene, and personal hygiene. R1 required substantial/moderate assistance with toileting and transfers. R1 attended speech therapy from 11/11/23, through 11/16/23, and physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) started on 11/11/23. R1's significant change MDS date 12/13/23, identified R1 had impairment on one side of the lower extremities and required substantial/maximal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-28 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure therapeutic diet per physicians orders were followed for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for therapeutic diets. Findings include: R1's admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], identified R1 had severe impaired cognition. R1 required partial to moderate assistance with eating meals. R1 required a mechanically altered diet. R1 attended speech therapy from 11/11/23, through 11/16/23. R1's significant change MDS date 12/13/23, identified R1 had impairment on one side of the lower extremities and required substantial/maximal assistance with eating and oral hygiene. R1's medical diagnoses included a mechanically altered diet. R1's care plan dated 12/19/23, identified regular diet, six, Soft and Bite-sized texture. Number two mildly thick consistency. R1's care plan directed staff to monitor/document/report, signs symptoms of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), pocketing, choking, coughing, drooling, holding food in mouth, several…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to immediately report (within two hours) an allegation of sexual abuse to the State Agency (SA) for 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for abuse. R2's Face Sheet indicated R2's diagnoses included post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and generalized anxiety disorder. R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R2 was cognitively intact, and required assistance of two staff for bed mobility, toilet use and transferring, and one staff for personal hygiene and dressing. A Vulnerable Adult Maltreatment Report submitted on 8/1/23 at 3:15 p.m., indicated R2 had reported an incident to her primary care doctor of being raped on 7/7/23. This was reported to the social worker at the facility. R2's care plan dated 7/6/23 indicated R2 could display physical, biological, social, spiritual, emotional, and/or psychological symptoms resulting from actual trauma (history of physical, sexual emotional abuse along with significant loss and financial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, document review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to have an effective system in place to prevent the spread of infection. The facility failed to have a complete water management program that was consistent with the current ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers) Guideline, which specifically called for documentation of design and maintenance procedures to protect from the potential exposure of Legionnaire's disease (a serious pneumonia infection) within a healthcare facility. This failure created a potential for 193 of 206 facility residents, who were over the age of 65, to be infected by Legionella. In addition, the facility failed to ensure 2 nursing assistants (NA) appropriately sanitized their hands by using soap during hand washing, prior to serving drinks to residents. The facility also failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (R- 198) maintained infection control practices when assisting another resident, (R153), with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from potential hazards to ensure their safety for 1 of 1 resident (R11) who was found by facility staff to have a smoking and a sparking electrical power strip in her room. The power strip was not removed after the incident and was still in use at the time of the survey and discovered to have black soot marks on 1 outlet on that power strip. 2 other power strips were observed in the boiler room and fitness room by the Fire Marshall and has the potential to affect all other residents in R11's wing, those residents and staff located near the boiler room, and who used the fitness room. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the safety of 1 of 1 resident (R92) who failed to discard cigarettes in a safe manner inside the building, had a history smoking in unauthorized places, and had a history of burnt clothing as a result of unsafe smoking. Refer also to K741 and K920 for additional information. Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and at appropriate temperatures to four of 38 residents residing on the 6th and 7th floors (R18, R103, R121, and R123). Foods that were to be served hot were not served at temperatures that met residents' tastes preferences. Findings include: Review of R18's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/02/23, located under the MDS tab. The assessment recorded a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 for R18, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. During an interview on 06/26/23 at 3:07 PM, R18 stated that she eats her meals in her room and the food is cold. Review of R103's EMR revealed a significant change in status MDS with an ARD of 04/13/23, located under the MDS tab. The assessment recorded a BIMS score of 12 out of 15 for R103, which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. During an interview on 06/26/23 at 1:50 p.m., R103 stated he eats his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, document review, and review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Code, the facility failed to assure food was stored, prepared, and served in a sanitary manner. Foods were not dated and /or labeled, covered, and disposed of after expiration. Equipment/surfaces were not clean or were not in good repair. These failures had the potential to increase the risk of food borne illnesses and affect 199 of 206 residents living at the facility who received food from dietary services. Findings include: Review of the, undated, policy titled Food Storage, provided by the facility on 06/29/23, revealed: Dry Storage: All items shall be dated and labeled when needed. (items that have manufacturer expiration dates, will be considered dated.) Items that are fresh for that meal or shift, - i.e., resident meal, resident drhks [drinks] will not need to be individually dated . Opened items will have a date reflecting the date that item was opened on if manufacturer sets open limit. Items will be covered and/or wrapped. Refrigerated Storage: All Foods should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, document review, and review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to revise their pneumococcal vaccine policy to reflect current pneumococcal vaccination guidelines. This failure increased the risk for residents to not be vaccinated per current guidelines and contract pneumonia. Findings include: Review of a policy provided by the facility titled Pneumococcal Vaccines, dated 12/2017, indicated All residents will be offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections. Both 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide (PPSV23®) and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate (PCV13®) vaccines will be administered routinely in series to all adults >65 years. Adults who are immunocompromised and aged 65 years or older should receive PCV13 followed by PPSV23 at least 1 year after PCV13. Review of the Center of Disease Control (CDC) website titled Pneumococcal Vaccination: Summary of Who and When to Vaccinate, last reviewed 01/24/22, indicated CDC recommends pneumococcal vaccination for all adults 65 years or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to honor a resident choice for a private room despite evidence that a private room would promote mental wellbeing for 1 of 1 resident (R191) reviewed for choices. Findings include: R191's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated R191 was cognitively intact and needed extensive assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs). R191's Medical Diagnosis list, dated 2/10/23, indicated R191 had several medical diagnoses including adjustment disorder with anxiety (an emotional or behavioral reaction to a stressful event or change in a person's life) and depression. R191's progress notes indicated at least three occasions R191 expressed concern over moving to a shared room. On 5/5/23 it was documented by social services R191, expressed concern, stating he does not want to be in a shared room. R191 also expressed concern that he did not feel, medically stable and believed a move may, hinder his mental and physical health. On 5/12/23 it was documented by social services R191 was transferring to rooms on 5/16/23. R191…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to notify the medical provider of a significant change in condition for one resident (R-190) of five residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the medical provider when the resident had an increase in abnormal involuntary movements (AIMS) while taking two antipsychotic medications. Findings include: Review of an undated policy provided by the facility, titled Change in Condition, revealed, Lakehouse Healthcare promptly notifies the resident, his or her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. Review of a policy provided by the facility, titled AIMS Assessment, dated 02/10/16, indicated the facility was to Notify the resident's physician/NP [Nurse Practitioner] of the initial AIMS score, and ongoing if there is a change in the resident's AIMS scores. Review of a document provided by the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure there were physician orders upon admission for all necessary care for one resident (R-565) of 35 sampled residents. The facility failed to ensure that there were PICC (Peripherally inserted central catheter) line dressing orders prior to changing R565's PICC line dressing. Findings include: Review of a policy provided by the facility titled Physician Orders.Patient Care Services, dated 01/03/14, indicated admission Orders from a Discharging Hospital.All signed physician orders, and pertinent medical information documented on the hospital transfer forms will be entered into the resident's EHR [electronic health record] by.licensed nurse. Review of R565's Hospitalist Discharge Summary, dated 06/16/23, which was located under the Misc [Miscellaneous] tab in the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R565 had septic arthritis of his hip. The discharge summary indicated the resident had surgery and required six weeks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and document review, the facility failed to provide routine baths and incontinence care to 1 of 1 resident (R92) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings include: R92's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicted R92 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with transfers, bed mobility, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. R92's Care Plan, dated 11/4/22, indicated R92 preferred to take a shower every Thursday morning after breakfast with staff assistance. The care plan further indicated R92 was totally dependent on staff for toilet use, dated 4/15/23, and was to be toileted upon rising, after meals and at bedtime, dated 4/19/22. R92's bathing task in the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R92 received only one shower during the month of June, occurring on 6/6/23. R92's toileting task in the EMR indicated R92 had been toileted on less than all three shifts, 20 times in the month of June. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide weekly baths to 1 of 1 resident (R11) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Findings include: R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R11 had intact cognition, required supervision with eating, and extensive assistance for all other activities of daily living (ADLs). R11's diagnoses included major depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety, suicidal ideations, obesity, overactive bladder, cataracts, hoarding disorder, diabetes, venous insufficiency (decreased circulation to the arms and legs), rectal prolapse, and psoriasis (a skin disease causing itchy, scaly patches). R11's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 6/24/22, indicated R11 triggered for visual function, communication, indwelling catheter, and pressure ulcers. R11's care plan undated, indicated R11 had an ADL self-care deficit related to increased pain, venous insufficiency, depression, and diabetes and bowel incontinence related to decreased…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure individualized activities were provided for 3 of 3 residents (R10, R59 and R 135) reviewed for activities. Findings include: R10 R10's admission Record dated 6/28/23, indicated R10's original admission date was 11/1/2004 with diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following cerebral infarction, aphasia (a language disorder that affects a person's ability to communicate), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move one side of the body) following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R10 had severe cognitive impairment, received enteral feeding via gastric tube, and was totally dependent on staff with all activities of daily living. During documentation review R10's Activity Interview for Daily and Activity Preferences, was last completed on 10/4/21. R10's Therapeutic Rec/Life Enrichment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to timely turn and reposition, and adjust wound treatment and follow physicians orders for a wound consult for 1 of 1 resident (R92) who had a facility acquired Stage II pressure injury (opening in skin caused by pressure that is not in the tissues). R92's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicted R92 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with transfers, bed mobility, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. The MDS further indicated R92 was at risk for pressure injuries. R92's Medical Diagnosis list indicated R92 had a primary medical diagnosis of metabolic encephalopathy (a problem in the brain caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood). R92'S care plan, dated 4/25/23, indicated R92 previously had a Stage II pressure injury to her right buttocks. Interventions included following facility protocols for the prevention of skin breakdown and encouraging R92 to change positions or offload weight.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident with a limited range of motion with a care planned nursing restorative program and splints for 2 of 2 resident (R49 and R141) reviewed for range of motion. Findings include: R141's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R141 needed extensive assistance with all activities of daily living with short-term and long-term memory problems. R141'S Medical Diagnoses list indicated R141 had a primary diagnosis of hemiplegia (one-sided muscle paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following a non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage affecting the right side (bleeding into the substance of the brain in the absence of trauma or surgery). R141's care plan, dated 6/24/22, indicated R141 was on a nursing maintenance program indicating, do these exercises 1xday for right arm: Move shoulder up, down. Move elbow in, out. Rotate forearm up, down. Bend wrist up, down. x10 each movement. Move slowly,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a feeding tube and feeding tube supplies were labeled according to professional standards to avoid the possibility of feeding tube complications and or related infections for 3 of 3 residents (R10, R59 and R135). Findings include: R10's admission Record dated 6/28/23, indicated R10's original admission date was 11/1/2004. Diagnoses included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following cerebral infarction (tissue damage related to lack of blood supply to the brain), aphasia (a language disorder that affects a person's ability to communicate), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move one side of the body) following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R10 had severe cognitive impairment, received enteral feeding via a gastric (stomach) tube, and was totally dependent on staff for all activities of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement immediate interventions for 1 of 1 resident with repeated suicidal ideation and depression, provide 1:1 supervision until it was determined she was no longer a threat to herself, and perform an immediate safety check of the resident and her surroundings to ensure her safety and mental well-being. Findings include: R137's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R137 had moderate cognitive impairment and needed supervision with all activities of daily (ADLs). R137's Medical Diagnosis List indicated R137 had several medical diagnoses including major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life) and adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct (symptoms include behavioral issues such as acting rebellious, destructive, reckless or impulsive), dated 5/26/22, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, document review and review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warnings (www.fda.gov), the facility failed to ensure one resident (R-190) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications had adequate indications for the continued use of two different antipsychotic (Seroquel and Zyprexa) medications. In addition, the facility failed to ensure action was taken in response to possible adverse drug reactions when the resident had an increase in symptoms of abnormal involuntary movements (AIMS) related to taking antipsychotics. Findings include: Review of FDA guidelines titled Highlights of Prescribing Information, dated 1996 and referring to the use of Zyprexa, revealed, Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotic drugs are at an increased risk of death. Zyprexa is not approved for the treatment of patients with dementia-related psychosis. Review of FDA guidelines titled Highlights of Prescribing Information, dated 1997 and referring to the use of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure that food preferences were honored for one resident (R-21) of 35 sampled residents. The resident's request and physician orders for a vegetarian diet were not honored. Findings include: Review of R21's Clinical Census, found in the electronic medical record (EMR), under the Clinical tab revealed R21 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder and adjustment disorder with anxiety. R21's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/29/23, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 out of 15 which indicated R21 was severely cognitively impaired. A recent Social Service note, dated 06/27/23, revealed the resident now had a BIMS score of 9 out of 15 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Physician Orders, found in the Clinical tab of the EMR and dated 09/05/22, revealed an order for vegetarian diet. Review of the Food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 resident (R52, R143) received ordered, therapeutic diets to maintain or improve their nutritional status. Findings include: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2022), Diabetes indicated keeping blood sugar levels within a healthy target range was important to prevent or delay serious health concerns such as heart and kidney disease. The article indicated a healthy target blood sugar to be 80-130 mg/dL prior to meals and less than 180 mg/dL two hours after the start of a meal. Chronically high blood sugar levels can lead to long-term, serious health problems such as fatigue. R52's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R52 had moderate cognitive deficits and required supervision for eating and extensive assistance with personal hygiene and dressing. R52's diagnoses included encephalopathy (a group of diseases that affect brain structure and/or function), urinary retention, diabetes,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and homelike environment for 3 of 3 residents (R10, R59, R135) whose tube feeding poles and equipment had dried tube feeding residue on them. Findings include: R10's admission Record dated 6/28/23, indicated R10 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following cerebral infarction (brain tissue damage related to lack of blood flow), aphasia (a language disorder that affects a person's ability to communicate), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move one side of the body) following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R10 had severe cognitive impairment, received enteral feeding via gastric tube, and was totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. R10's Order Summary Report indicated Enteral Feed order two times a day, Glucerna…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LAKE HARRIET OPERATOR HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/01/2023
CCP MN HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2023
GLEN HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2023
HARMONY HOLDINGS 2005, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2023
HIGHVIEW HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2023
JK 2022 FAMILY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2023
LIGHTHOUSE HOLDINGS 2016, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2023
MIMI HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2023
MN HOLDINGS 101 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2023
MN V ASSOCIATES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2023
SSHG FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2025
YDN FAMILY GRANTOR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2025
HEWITT, REIDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/14/2025
KNOBEL, REUVENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
TARLOW, LEONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2024
FAIRBAIRN, SCOTTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2023
GOTTESMAN, DANIELIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2025
3737 BRYANT AVENUE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$20.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 6%Other / private 23%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$359per resident / day
operating cost
$10,918per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$389per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Minnesota
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,870/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,573/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245055. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next