Mn Veterans Home-Mpls

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 45.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 341 beds and averages 293.5 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.21 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.47 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.00 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.48 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.67 to 0.98 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and document review, the facility failed to follow R1's Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) do not attempt resuscitation (DNR), do not intubate, and to allow natural death for 1 of 3 residents (R1) when R1 became unresponsive after a fall and licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The immediate jeopardy began on [DATE] when R1 became unresponsive after a fall, licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and was identified on [DATE]. The campus administrator, director of nursing, and nurse manager of facility staff were notified of the immediate jeopardy at 3:20 p.m. on [DATE]. The immediate jeopardy was removed on [DATE] and the deficient practice corrected on [DATE], prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past Noncompliance. Findings include: R1's Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) dated [DATE], indicated he was a DNR. R1's progress note dated [DATE] at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-04-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from a significant medication error for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for medication errors. This resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) citation when licensed practical nurse, (LPN)-A administered morphine, a narcotic medication, 20 times the amount that was ordered by the provider. The immediate jeopardy began on 4/11/25 p.m. when LPN-A administered 20 times the amount of liquid morphine to R1 and was identified on 4/17/25. The director or nursing (DON) and the Administrator were notified of the immediate jeopardy at 3:03 p.m. on 4/17/25. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 4/17/25, and the deficient practice corrected on 4/14/25, prior to the start of the survey and was therefore was issued at past noncompliance. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1's primary diagnosis was cerebral vascular accident (stroke). Other diagnoses included: diabetes, dementia and atrial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2026-07-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to monitor dishwasher temperatures in the main kitchen. This had the potential to increase the risk of food borne illness and affect 293 residents who received food from dietary services. Findings include: The dishwasher temperature log for July of 2026, indicated the required temperatures were 160 degrees (Fahrenheit) for the wash cycle and 180 degrees for the final rinse cycle. It further indicated to report low temperatures to the supervisor immediately which was also highlighted in yellow. The following temperatures and dates were recorded on the log and did not meet the requirements for safe dishwashing temperatures: -7/1/26 wash cycle for supper 154 degrees-7/2/26 wash cycle during lunch 157 degrees-7/4/26 final rinse cycle during dinner 173 degrees-7/5/26 wash cycle for supper 150 degrees, final rinse cycle 179 degrees-7/6/26 wash cycle during breakfast 158 degrees-7/7/26 wash cycle during lunch 159 degrees-7/8/26 wash cycle during breakfast 150 degrees and final rinse cycle 174 degrees-7/9/26 final…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure as-needed (PRN) psychotropic medication orders had a defined stop date and were limited to 14 days without a documented rationale for extension for 1 of 5 residents (R279) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R279's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R279 was severely cognitively impaired, and had diagnoses of non-traumatic brain dysfunction, Alzheimer's disease, non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety, and depression. R279 had verbal behavioral symptoms (such as threatening or screaming) directed toward others, behavioral symptoms not directed at others (such as disruptive sounds, pacing, ect.), and wandering. R237 used a wheelchair for mobility. R279's Mood/Behavior care plan focus revised 6/11/26, directed staff to administer prescribed medications per MD/NP orders, monitor for side effects of medications, notify provider with concerns, and refer to behavioral services as needed. R279's Order Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to follow doctor's orders for 1 of 1 resident (R87) reviewed who required daily weights. In addition, the facility failed to ensure services were coordinated with the hospice agency for 1 of 1 resident (R265) reviewed who received hospice services. Finding include: R87's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated severely impaired cognition and diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic kidney disease, and dementia. R87's physician's orders dated 5/18/26, indicated daily weight for CHF, in the morning and to update the provider if the resident gains +2 pounds (lbs.) per day or +5 lbs. per week R87's treatment administration record (TAR) indicated the following weights: -6/1/26 229.5 lbs. -6/2/26 236.2 lbs. R87 gained 6.7 lbs. between 6/1/26 and 6/2/26. R87's care plan dated 6/22/26, indicated R87 had CHF and indicated the following interventions: -Apply oxygen 2-5 liters per minute for desaturation, titrate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were followed for 1 of 1 resident (R11) reviewed for EBP.Findings include:R11's quarterly Minimum Assessment Data (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R11 had moderate cognitive impairment, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, required moderate assistance to transfer to the toilet, and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene. R11's Clinical Diagnosis form dated 7/9/26 indicated a diagnosis of carrier of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). R11's Clinical Profile dated 7/9/26 indicated R11 was on EBP.R11's care plan dated 7/9/26, included a care plan focused on EBP. The EBP care plan indicated R11 required enhanced barrier precautions due to history/diagnosis of MRSA in nares and directed staff to wear gown and gloves when in room providing personal cares.During observation on 7/9/26 at 11:07 a.m., a sign on R11's door indicated he was on EBP. The sign directed staff to wear a gown…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure that recommended pneumococcal vaccinations were offered and/or that shared clinical decision-making regarding pneumococcal vaccinations occurred, as outlined by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), to reduce the risk of severe disease for 1 of 5 residents (R11) reviewed for immunizations.Findings include:A CDC Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults chart dated 3/2025, included a table identifying when each (or all) of the pneumococcal vaccinations should be obtained for adults 50 years and older. The chart indicated that when a resident had received the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) at any age and the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine 23 (PPSV23) at greater than 65 years, the resident and provider may choose to administer the 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) or the 21-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV21). R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R11 was [AGE] years old at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a voiced grievance of a missing shirt was acted upon timely to help facilitate prompt resolution for 1 of 1 resident (R232) who reported such item as missing with no follow-up. Findings include: R232's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R232 was cognitively intact. R232's progress note failed to identify a missing item reported on 2/28/25. However, there was a late entry on 3/6/25 at 9:30 a.m., R232 expressed to writer his black long sleeve shirt was stolen by a p.m. staff member. R232's progress note dated 3/6/25 at 4:33 p.m., (documented as a late entry) identified R232 pointed out the staff member that allegedly stole his black long sleeve shirt, and the nurse writer immediately removed staff from resident care. The writer and ADON interviewed both the resident and staff member and filed a report with MDH (Minnesota Department of Health). R232's progress notes failed to show follow-up after the missing item was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to conduct accurate and on-going assessments for bruising, and implement skin protection interventions for 1 of 1 resident (R10) reviewed for anticoagulant use, and failed to follow orders for ankle compression sleeves (compression stockings) to legs for 1 of 1 resident (R53) reviewed for edema. Findings include: R10's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R10 was independent with mobility, used a walker on and off the unit, was cognitively intact, had a diagnoses of anemia and atrial fibrillation, and took an anticoagulant (blood thinning) medication. No other skin conditions or skin concerns were documented. R10's annual skin assessment dated [DATE], described on going skin issues as, resident bruises easily r/t apixaban usage. R10's care plan dated 11/29/2024, identified the medical management of anticoagulant therapy and included R10 would be free from discomfort, but failed to apply interventions to protect R10's skin while taking…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to follow up and implement treatment for improved hearing for 1 of 1 residents (R277) when complaints of hearing loss were made. Findings include: R277's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R277 had intact cognition, adequate hearing (no difficulty in everyday conversation), and did not use hearing aids. R277's provider Admit Note dated 10/8/24, indicated R277 had stated he had an audiogram which showed some hearing loss and particularly had difficulty with hearing in crowded rooms. The note indicated that R277 was interested in pursuing further evaluation for hearing aids. R277's medical record was reviewed and did not indicate further follow-up on R277's request for hearing aids. The note indicated R277 had declined in-house audiology services but was interested in an audiology evaluation to work towards getting hearing aids. During an interview on 4/7/25 at 12:57 p.m., R277 stated he had a hearing test around the time he was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff assisted 1 of 1 resident (R74), who was reviewed for restorative nursing program, to attend their GI (general term used for government issued) therapy gym sessions or document reasons resident was not available for attendance. The facility further failed to ensure occupational therapist recommendations were care planned and initiated for one of two residents (R184) who was assessed as at risk for bilateral hand contractures and impaired skin due to clenching fist reviewed for services to prevent decrease in range of motion. Findings include: R74 R74's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R74 had severe cognitive impairment and no behaviors or rejection of care. R74 had impairment on one side of upper and lower extremity and required substantial to total assistance with activities of daily living. R74 had diagnoses which included coronary artery disease, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to analyze and care plan R596's multiple declinations to wear supplemental oxygen as ordered for 1 of 1 resident (R596) reviewed for oxygen use. Findings include: R596's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R596 had intact cognition and no behaviors or rejection of care. R596 had impairments to both sides of lower extremities. R596 required substantial and/or maximal or greater assistance with most activities of daily living, setup or clean-up assistance with eating, and supervision or touching assistance with oral hygiene. R596's diagnoses included anemia, heart failure, hypertension, renal failure, diabetes mellitus, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), and respiratory failure. The MDS indicated R596 had oxygen therapy. R596's care plan printed 4/8/25, indicated R596 required oxygen therapy with focus area initiated on 12/31/24. Care plan interventions included:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $544K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN