Southside Care Center
2644 Aldrich Avenue South, Minneapolis, MN 55408 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 17 certified beds · (612) 872-4233 Medicaid only — no Medicare
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (62) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.3% | 18.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 4.1% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.9% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 17.5% | 4.1% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 8.0% | 4.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 0.0% | 20.5% | 16.1% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 38.8% | 12.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.0% | 5.2% | 4.7% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 2.1% | 24.5% | 21.2% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 17 beds and averages 12.6 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 0.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.19 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.97 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
62 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 50 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-04-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident advance directives were accurately and consistently documented between the physician orders in the resident's electronic health record (EHR) and the Provider Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) in the hard chart to ensure the resident's wishes would be followed in the event of a cardiac arrest. This resulted in immediate jeopardy for 2 of 13 residents (R2, R6) whose code statuses were not accurately documented, with an additional resident (R1) discrepancy found in a facility-wide audit.The immediate jeopardy began on [DATE], when interviews with the direct care nurse and director of nursing indicated they would implement incorrect procedures and not started CPR on R2 if found without a pulse and not breathing, and would have started CPR against R6's wishes under those same circumstances. The administrator and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the immediate jeopardy on [DATE], at 7:20 p.m. The immediate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-10-23 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to develop and implement individualized non-pharmacological interventions to manage behaviors for 2 of 2 residents (R1, R3) who had mental health disorders with behaviors. The facility's failures resulted in harm for R1 when she sustained burns from using hot towels to self-soothe to relieve anxiety symptoms and had multiple hospitalization for mental health stabilization. Findings include: R1's face sheet identified R1 was admitted to facility October of 2022 with diagnoses including, borderline personality disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, unspecified mood [affective] disorder, and major depressive disorder, single episode, severe without psychotic features. R1's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 as cognitively intact with no evidence of acute change in mental status from R1's baseline. R1 did not display behaviors. R1 was independent in mobility and activities of daily living. R1's care plan dated 6/22/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — widespreadProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess, develop, and implement meaningful and engaging activities for 4 of 4 residents (R3, R4, R8, R9 ) reviewed who expressed concerns over a lack of activities at the facility. This had the potential to affect all 13 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: R3 R3's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R3 with intact cognition, did not reject care, was independent with most hygiene cares, and medical conditions of schizophrenia, diabetes, anxiety, and a psychotic disorder. The Activity Preferences portion of the MDS identified question of, How important is it to you to do your favorite activities? with response of, very important. R3's care plan (CP) interventions dated 3/21/25 identified, [R3] enjoys a balance between both independent and small group activities that meet her mental and psychosocial needs. [R3] Her favorite small group activities include pizza and ice cream socials…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-06 · tag F0680 — widespreadEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to have a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist (i.e., activities director) whom was successfully qualified and/or credentialed, as required, to ensure competent assessment and implementation of activities programming within the care center. This had potential to affect all 13 residents at the time of survey.Findings include:See F679:During interview with activities director (A)-A on 4/3/26 at 8:31 a.m., A-A stated he was hired in September 2025. A-A stated he was only activities staff at facility and that he created monthly activities calendar and I am supposed to drive [residents] to appointments. A-A stated, nothing is scheduled for time or place of activities. A-A stated he did not write progress notes, update resident care plans with preferences and choices, or keep documentation of activity attendances. A-A stated he did not attend QAPI meetings either. A-A stated he had no previous training, licensure, or full-time experience to be a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was scheduled for a minimum of eight consecutive hours each day. This had the potential to affect all 13 residents who resided at the facility.Findings include: Review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report, submitted for the first quarter of 2026 (October 1-December 31), identified no RN hours for the following dates: 11/5/25, 11/8/25, 11/16/25, 11/20/25, 12/21/25. Review of the facility timecards dated 10/1/25 to 12/31/25, indicated that on 11/5/25, 11/16/25, 11/20/25, and 12/21/25, the facility had no RN hours. During an email communication on 3/31/26 at 4:21 p.m., the building owner (O)-O stated that on:11/5/25: An RN had been scheduled to work, but an LPN had to cover this shift.11/8/25: An RN was scheduled to work and did per timecard data.11/16/25: An RN called in, and an LPN ended up covering for her.11/20/25: An RN was scheduled for a shift, and an LPN ended up covering his shift.12/21/25: An RN was scheduled to work, and an LPN ended up covering the shift. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were properly stored, dated and disposed of to reduce the risk of cross contamination and potential foodborne illnesses in the main production kitchen. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the main production kitchen refrigerator freezer unit was adequately cleaned and maintained and failed to ensure staff followed appropriate infection control techniques while preparing food when staff were observed to prepare food without a hairnet. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 13 residents who consumed food prepared by the facility.Findings include:During initial kitchen tour on 3/30/26 at 11:50 a.m., cook (CK)-A reviewed the main floor refrigerator and attached freezer unit with State Surveyor. The following items were observed:Main refrigerator contents included one opened 3-pound container of sour cream, one 64-ounce container each of orange juice and apple juice, one 32-ounce container of strawberry jam, one gallon of milk, and seven unpasteurized eggs. CK-A verified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan was identified, implemented, and maintained to ensure acceptable levels of performance and continual improvement. In addition, the facility failed to identify and prioritize problems, such as quality deficiencies that the facility was/should have been aware of and then develop and implement appropriate actions utilizing ongoing QAPI activities. This deficient practice affected all 13 residents residing in the facility.Findings include: The facility's QAPI Program policy dated 2/2020, indicated the facility should develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide, data-driven QAPI program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for its residents. The policy indicated the facility would develop a process for:-Tracking and measuring performance.-Establishing goals and thresholds for performance measurements.-Identifying and prioritizing quality deficiencies.-Systematically analyzing underlying causes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee that effectively identified and responded to quality deficiencies, and developed procedures for feedback, data collection, and monitoring systems. In addition, the facility failed to provide evidence of a Performance Improvement Project (PIP), which focused on high-risk or problem-prone areas. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 13 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: QAPI meeting notes dated 10/14/25, 11/11/25, 12/9/25, 1/13/26, 2/10/26, and 3/10/26 were reviewed and lacked tracking of data-driven quality metrics over time or performance improvement projects (PIPs). During an interview on 4/6/26 at 1:28 p.m., the administrator stated that the facility held QAPI meetings monthly, but the QAPI committee was fairly new. The administrator stated they did not currently have a formal process in place for collecting data to track and measure performance or a formal plan for QAPI at the moment. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the Quality Assurance (QA) committee failed to ensure that the required members of the committee attended the meetings. This had the potential to affect all 13 residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: QAPI meeting notes dated 10/14/25, 11/11/25, 12/9/25, 1/13/26, 2/10/26, and 3/10/26 were reviewed and indicated that only four members regularly attended the meetings, including the administrator, the director of nursing (DON), the medical director, and the consultant pharmacist. The notes did not indicate that the infection preventionist attended. During an interview on 4/6/26 at 11:36 a.m., the infection preventionist (IC-MDS) stated she did not regularly attend QAPI meetings. During an interview on 4/6/26 at 1:30 p.m., the administrator stated they had four staff members who regularly attended QAPI which included himself, the DON, the medical director, and the pharmacist. The administrator stated he had tried to include the IC-MDS in the past, but it did not work with her schedule. The administrator stated he was aware they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were maintained during laundry services. This had potential to affect all 13 residents who resided in the facility.Findings include: During observation and interview with housekeeper (HK)-A on 3/30/26 at 2:01 p.m., HK-A stated facility had one washing machine and one clothes dryer located in basement of facility. HK-A stated she was responsible for all personal and facility laundry in addition to sweeping, dusting, vacuuming and washing hard surfaces. HK-A stated she was the facility's only housekeeper and worked 5 days per week. HK-A was observed walking downstairs to basement with soiled resident laundry in an uncovered plastic laundry basket that had holes/openings around it. HK-A stated she did not cover laundry when transporting it from resident rooms to the basement and when transporting clean linen to resident rooms and facility closets where linen and towels were located. HK-A verified she also did not wear personal protective equipment (PPE) gown when sorting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement an active antibiotic stewardship program which included development of protocols and a system to monitor appropriateness of antibiotic including prophylactic antibiotic use to prevent antibiotic resistance and help prevent the spread of infectious diseases. This had the potential to affect all 13 residents of facility who might use antibiotics. Findings include:During entrance conference with administrator on 3/30/26 at 12:00 p.m., the administrator stated the infection control preventionist (IC)-MDS was responsible for the facility's infection control, surveillance, and antibiotic stewardship program.During interview with infection control preventionist (IC)-MDS on 4/1/26 at 12:48 p.m., IC-MDS stated she worked part time at facility since the fall of 2025 and visited facility once per week. IC-MDS stated she usually review the [resident] medication administration records (MARs) for antibiotics and anything that goes with it. In addition, IC-MDS stated, I am notified via email or when I arrive here weekly of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
During observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure facility was maintained in good repair which had the potential to affect all 13 residents, staff, and visitors of the facility.Findings include: Facility Assessment (FA) dated 7/21/2025, identified resident population must be ambulatory and not require a wheelchair. In addition, the Physical Environment-building needs portion of the FA identified, Outside grounds and building is maintained/repaired using the on-line maintenance work-order system.During entrance conference with administrator and director of nursing (DON) on 3/30/26 at 11:30 a.m., State Agency (SA) requested a list of residents who smoked. At 3:13 p.m., an email was received from administrator which identified 6 of the 13 residents (R2, R3, R4, R5, R8, R9) as smokers.During observation and interview with R11 in his shared room on 3/30/26 at 1:07 p.m., R11 pointed to door jamb of his closet which had missing 3 inches of wood where the strike plate and the door latch met. R11 shrugged and said it had been there as long as he could remember and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 50 citations
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-06 · tag F0942 — widespreadEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed mandatory resident rights training for 1 of 5 staff members (registered nurse (RN)-B) reviewed for training requirements. This had the potential to affect all 13 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility assessment dated [DATE], indicated that clinical staff were to receive training on resident rights annually. Review of personnel records indicated that RN-B had not completed education that included resident rights in the last year. During an interview on 4/6/26 at 11:40 a.m., when asked about abuse training, resident rights training, QAPI training, and infection control training, the director of nursing (DON) stated she would expect staff to complete training twice a year. During an interview on 4/6/26 at 12:35 p.m., the human resources analyst (HRA) stated the facility did not usually have staff who continued employment past a year as RN-B had, so she had missed re-assigning her training for resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-06 · tag F0943 — widespreadGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed mandatory abuse/vulnerable adult training for 1 of 5 staff members (registered nurse (RN)-B) reviewed for training requirements. This had the potential to affect all 13 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility assessment dated [DATE], indicated that clinical staff were to receive training on vulnerable adults/abuse annually. Review of personnel records indicated that RN-B had not completed education that included abuse/vulnerable adult training in the last year. During an interview on 4/6/26 at 11:40 a.m., when asked about abuse training, resident rights training, QAPI training, and infection control training, the director of nursing (DON) stated she would expect staff to complete training twice a year. During an interview on 4/6/26 at 12:35 p.m., the human resources analyst (HRA) stated the facility did not usually have staff who continued employment past a year as RN-B had, so she had missed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-06 · tag F0944 — widespreadConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed mandatory quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) training for 5 of 5 staff members (director of nursing (DON), registered nurse (RN)-A, RN-B, licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A, LPN-B) reviewed for training requirements. This had the potential to affect all 13 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility assessment dated [DATE], indicated that clinical staff were to receive training on QAPI annually. Review of personnel records indicated that the DON, RN-A, RN-B, LPN-A, and LPN-B had not completed education that included QAPI in the last year before survey entrance. During an interview on 4/6/26 at 11:40 a.m., when asked about abuse training, resident rights training, QAPI training, and infection control training, the director of nursing (DON) stated she would expect staff to complete training twice a year. During an interview on 4/6/26 at 12:35 p.m., the human resources analyst (HRA) stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-06 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — widespreadInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed mandatory infection control training for 1 of 5 staff members (registered nurse (RN)-B) reviewed for training requirements. This had the potential to affect all 13 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility assessment dated [DATE], indicated that clinical staff were to receive training on infection control annually. Review of personnel records indicated that RN-B had not completed education that included infection control in the last year. During an interview on 4/6/26 at 11:40 a.m., when asked about abuse training, resident rights training, QAPI training, and infection control training, the director of nursing (DON) stated she would expect staff to complete training twice a year. During an interview on 4/6/26 at 12:35 p.m., the human resources analyst (HRA) stated the facility did not usually have staff who continued employment past a year as RN-B had, so she had missed re-assigning her training for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-06 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure private and confidential resident information was secure and not visible to residents and staff members who did not require access, when documents were found stored in an unprotected manner. This had the ability to affect 9 of the 13 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R7, R9, R10, R12) residing at the facility whose medical documents were found unprotected.Findings include: Basement During a continuous observation starting at 3/30/26 at 1:04 p.m., a staircase leading down to a small room was observed. On the left side of the small room were two desks and a small cabinet with a pile of paper that was approximately two feet high. The documents were reviewed and included documents for R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R7, R9, R10, R12 as well as multiple discharged residents. The pile included documents such as resident order summary sheets and medication administration records, and the documents reviewed were dated from 6/2025 to 1/2026. On the right side of the room was a clothes washer and dryer, and various cleaning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a manner to reduce the risk of unauthorized access for 5 of 5 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5) observed to have medications stored in an unsecured facility refrigerator.Findings include:During an observation and interview on 4/1/26 at 9:21 a.m. in the facility dining room, a medication cart with a small mini refrigerator next to it was observed. The mini fridge was not observed to have a lock on it. Registered nurse (RN)-A stated that they stored medications that needed refrigeration in the small mini refrigerator. RN-A was observed to open the mini fridge door and show that they have a small lock box inside, but they did not use it now. No medications were observed inside the lock box. Inside the medication fridge, multiple boxes of medication were observed, including Copaxone (an injection medication used to treat multiple sclerosis), Ozempic (an injection medication used to treat diabetes), and Trulicity (an injection medication used to treat diabetes).During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure recommended influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations, as outlined by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), were offered and/or provided in a timely manner to reduce the risk of severe disease for all 13 residents reviewed for immunizations.Findings include: A CDC Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults feature, dated March 2025, identified several tables with corresponding recommendations for patient on when to receive various versions of the pneumococcal vaccine depending on their age and diagnoses. In addition, recommendations identified importance of shared clinical decision-making with their provider. During interview with director of nursing (DON) on 3/31/26 at 11:38 a.m., DON stated the facility did not have a process in place to document vaccination status of all residents. DON stated the residents were all mobile and we send them to Walgreens and ask for a copy [of their vaccination information]. DON reviewed resident paper charts and electronic medical records (EMR) of all 13 residents and stated they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-06 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to establish and maintain documentation of COVID-19 vaccination status for all 13 residents of facility. In addition, facility failed to establish and maintain documentation of COVID-19 vaccination status for cook (CK)-B to include being offered and/or provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with COVID-19 vaccination. This had the potential to affect all 13 residents and staff of facility.Findings include: Residents:During interview with director of nursing (DON) on 3/31/26 at 11:38 a.m., DON stated the facility did not have a process in place to document vaccination status of all residents. DON stated the residents were all mobile and we send them to [pharmacy] and ask for a copy [of their vaccination information]. DON reviewed resident paper charts and electronic medical records (EMR) of all 13 residents and stated they lacked immunization records. '[it is] hard to tell who needs a vaccine or not at this time. In addition, DON stated facility lacked documentation or messaging to providers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During observation and interview, the facility failed to reasonably accommodate resident preference for a private and usable space for R6 who shared a room.Findings include:R6's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition and was independent with most personal cares. In addition, R6 gad diagnoses of depression, diabetes, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder.During observation on 3/30/26 at 1:15 p.m., R6 was lying in his bed in his two-person room. R6's twin sized bed was located inside the door frame to the hallway. The bed was parallel to and against the North wall of room. The footboard of his bed was against a closet which extended from North wall by 20 inches. A privacy curtain attached to the ceiling started at the closet above the foot of his bed and draped around a dresser which measured 18 inches deep by 30 inches long. The curtain was pulled out to encompass the dresser and then immediately parallel and against R6 bed to the head of his bed and [NAME] wall. There was no carpet or floor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to immediately report incidents of potential resident-to-resident abuse to the state agency (SA) within two hours, as required for 2 of 2 residents (R2, R8) reviewed for abuse.Findings include:R2R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was completed, and R2 had a score of 15/15, indicating intact cognition.R2's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS indicated that the BIMS and the staff assessment for mental status were not completed. The MDS indicated R2 was diagnosed with anxiety and depression.R2's progress notes were reviewed and lacked an indication that R2's allegations of resident-to-resident abuse were reported to the SA.R8R8's admission MDS dated [DATE], indicated that R8 had intact cognition and had verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others (e.g., threatening others, screaming at others, cursing at others) one to three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure complete and comprehensive Minimum Data Set(s) (MDS) were completed for 1 of 5 residents (R7) reviewed for assessment accuracy.Findings include:The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, dated 10/2025, identified the MDS as an assessment tool that facilities are required to use. The manual directed comprehensive assessments, include the completion of both the MDS and the CAA process, as well as care planning. The CMS RAI manual also identified that the RAI process (i.e., MDS) was completed to help evaluate residents' strengths and areas for care planning.R7's annual MDS dated [DATE], included the following information:-Section C- Cognitive Patterns: indicated C0100 (Should Brief Interview for Mental Status (C0200-C0500) be Conducted?) was not assessed, as well as Sections C0200 through C1310, fields regarding mental status, memory, cognitive skills, and signs of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure that quarterly Minimum Data Set(s) (MDS) were completed in a thorough manner for 2 of 5 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for assessment accuracy.Findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, dated 10/2025, identified the RAI consists of three basic components, including the MDS, the Care Area Assessment (CAA), and the utilization guidelines and this process (i.e., use of the entire RAI) was mandated by CMS. The manual outlined that a quarterly assessment was a non-comprehensive assessment which was to be completed every 92 days and was used to track a resident's status between comprehensive assessments . to ensure critical indicators of gradual change in a resident's status are monitored. The manual included a section labeled, SECTION C: COGNITIVE PATTERNS, which outlined how the section would be used to help determine the resident's attention,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurately coded with the potential for inaccurate federal reimbursement and resident care planning for 2 of 5 residents (R1, R3) reviewed for MDS accuracy.Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurately coded with the potential for inaccurate federal reimbursement and resident care planning for 2 of 5 residents (R1, R3) reviewed for MDS accuracy.Findings include:R1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated under Section I: Active Diagnoses, that R1 did not have a diagnosis of non-Alzheimer's dementia.R1's Diagnosis Report dated 12/22/25, indicated R1 had a diagnosis of vascular dementia added on 12/22/25.R1's provider note dated 12/8/25, indicated R1 had a diagnosis of vascular dementia, and there had been some progression of this dementia.R3's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated under Section N - Medications, that R40 had received 1 day of insulin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure timeliness of person-centered care conferences for 3 of 3 residents (R2, R4, R6) and to include periodic review and revision by an interdisciplinary team along with the residents in adjusting their care plan and making decisions about their care.Findings inclide: R2's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated the BIMS was completed, and R2 had a score of 15/15, indicating intact cognition. R2's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS indicated that the BIMS and the staff assessment for mental status were not assessed. R2's medical record was reviewed, and the last care conference note was dated 8/21/25. During an interview on 3/30/26 at 6:05 p.m., the administrator confirmed the note from 8/21/25 was the most recent care conference note he could find for R2. During an interview on 4/1/26 at 1:05 p.m., R2 stated she did not recall being offered or attending a care conference in the last few…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to provide routine dental services to 2 of 2 residents (R3, R4) reviewed for dental services. Findings include: R3R3's face sheet identified R3 admitted to facility on 4/10/2020.R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R3 with intact cognition, did not reject care, was independent with personal and oral hygiene, and diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, bipolar, diabetes, anxiety, and epilepsy.R3's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 3/21/25 identified R3, Teeth show obvious cavities and missing most of upper teeth and triggered a dental care plan due to medications, unstable diabetes,R3's care plan (CP) dated 4/18/20, identified, PERSONAL HYGIENE/ORAL CARE: The resident requires supervision to assistance of 1 PRN to complete hygiene cares and The resident has potential for oral/dental health problems r/t Poor oral hygiene. In addition, CP intervention state, Coordinate arrangements for dental care, transportation as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-03 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to employ a registered dietician or other active qualified clinical nutrition professional to carry out the functions of a facility registered dietician. This had potential to affect 11 of 11 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings include: When interviewed on 1/27/25 at 12:07 p.m., cook (C)-B, who was the head cook, stated eggs were on the menu every day, but they did not serve eggs every day. C-B stated other cooks did not follow the menu which made ordering and using items before perishing more difficult. C-B stated they had one resident who was a vegetarian; otherwise, the other residents were on a regular house diet. When asked about the registered dietician's involvement, C-B stated they thought the registered dietician quit and did not come to the facility anymore. When interviewed on 1/27/25 at 1:24 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-A, who was the facility administrator and director or nursing, stated they had a newly-hired dietician, and the new dietician had not been as involved as the previous one. RN-A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper sanitization of dishware used for meal preparation and resident service, and ensure food was properly stored and dated and disposed of. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure staff followed appropriate infection control techniques while rinsing dirty dishes, placing clean dishes to dry, and placing items into the refrigerator. This deficient practice affected all 11 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 1/27/25 at 12:04 p.m., cook (C)-B, who was the head cook, had gloves on and rinsed dishes in the sink, placed silverware and serving trays into the dish machine, and removed gloves and did not perform hand hygiene. The dish machine ran, and the wash temperature fluctuated between 141 to 144 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) and the rinse temperature raised to 178°F . C-B stated the temperature of the dish machine fluctuated, and the dish machine was fixed multiple times. C-B…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-03 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the administration failed to provide adequate oversight, training, and guidance for appropriate resident care related to accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments, qualified staff and related services, the pre-admission screen and resident review (PASARR) process, and Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan and Quality Assurance and Assessment (QAA) committee requirements. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 11 residents residing in the facility, potential new admissions, visitors, and employees of the facility. Findings include: QUALIFIED STAFF AND RELATED SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR Per Southside Care Center Nursing and Administrator Coverage policy and procedure updated 12/5/24, the administration would have addressed all the proposed plans of correction (POC) to ensure consistent compliance with both state and federal regulations for nursing facilities and would audit these corrective actions throughout the QAPI process. Furthermore, the policy indicated the facility's administration would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-03 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data, during 1 of 1 quarter reviewed (Q4), to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) according to specifications established by CMS. Findings include: Review of the facility's payroll based journal (PBJ) staffing data report dated 7/1/24 - 9/30/24 (Q4), identified the facility failed to have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours/day for the following dates: 7/3/24, 7/6/24, 7/7/24, 7/12/24, 7/13/24, 7/14/24, 7/19/24, 7/20/24, 7/28/24, 7/29/24, 7/30/24, 8/1/24, 8/2/24, 8/3/24, 8/4/24, 8/5/24, 8/6/24, 8/10/24, 8/11/24, 8/12/24, 8/13/24, 8/16/24, 8/17/24, 8/18/24, 8/20/24, 8/23/24, 8/24/24, 8/25/24, 8/27/24, 8/28/24, 8/30/24, 8/31/24, 9/1/24, 9/2/24, 9/3/24, 9/6/24, 9/7/24, 9/8/24, 9/9/24, 9/10/24, 9/10/24, 9/11/24, 9/14/24, 9/15/24, 9/20/24, 9/21/24, 9/22/24, 9/25/24, 9/26/24, 9/27/24, 9/28/24, and 9/30/24. The facility's schedule dated 7/1/24 - 7/15/24 indicated they did have licensed nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to implement a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan assuring care and services were identified to maintain acceptable levels of performance and continual improvement. Additionally, facility failed to identify and prioritize problems and opportunities that reflect organizational process, functions, and services provided to residents based on performance indicators, and resident and staff input. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure governing body oversight of the facility's QAPI program and activities. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 11 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: An undated facility policy titled Quality Assessment and Assurance program (QAA) indicated the facility would maintain a QAA committee which would meet quarterly, and its purpose was to develop an on-going quality assurance program through an interdisciplinary approach and assess the effectiveness of the health care provided to the residents. The policy indicated the structure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA)/Quality Assurance Process improvement (QAPI) committee was effective in implementing appropriate action plans to correct quality deficiencies identified in previous surveys related to Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment inaccuracies, activities, trauma-informed care, food sanitation, and failure to implement a QAPI plan and maintain a QAPI committee with improvement projects which resulted in deficiencies identified during this survey. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings include: A review of the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting (CASPER) system report (a quality measure report for nursing facilities) last updated 1/22/25, indicated the facility had the following deficiencies with a survey exit date of 11/30/23: - F641 Accuracy of Assessments - F679 Activities Meet Interest/Needs of Each Resident - F699 Trauma-Informed Care - F812 Food Procurement, Store/Prepare/Serve Sanitary - F865 QAPI…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and document review, the Quality Assurance (QA) committee failed to ensure required members of the committee attended the quarterly meetings. This had the potential to affect all 11 residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: An undated facility policy titled Quality Assessment and Assurance program (QAA) indicated the facility would maintain a QAA committee which would meet quarterly, and the structure of the committee would consist of the administrator, the medical director, director of nursing (DON), program director, and consulting pharmacist. The policy further indicated the objective of the QAA program was the ensure compliance with standards and regulations and other staff and/or individuals may be asked to attend the meetings by request of the committee. The facility's Quality Assurance Meeting sign-in sheets dated 1/8/24, 4/8/24, 7/8/24, 10/7/24, and 1/13/25 were reviewed on 1/31/25 at 1:47 p.m. and revealed the medical director had not signed in for any QAA meetings. The sign-in sheets further identified registered nurse (RN)-A identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were maintained during laundry services. This had potential to affect all 11 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: During observation and interview on 1/28/25 at 8:05 a.m., housekeeping (HK)-D, who was also the head of housekeeping and laundry services, wore gloves and no gown to put laundry detergent and Clorox Bleach into the washer machine, took linens and bed sheets from a bag on the floor and placed them into the washer machine in multiple loads, and closed the washer machine. HK-D folded clean washcloths with the same gloves. HK-D stated they do not need to wear a gown to load dirty linen and clothes into the washer machine. HK-D verified they used the same gloves to load the dirty laundry and fold the clean washcloths. When interviewed on 2/3/25 at 10:09 a.m., registered nurse (RN)-A, who was the administrator and director of nursing, expected staff to wear gloves to handle soiled laundry and change gloves and perform hand hygiene prior to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-03 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the acting infection preventionist (IP) had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 11 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: After reviewing the facility documents, no certification for Infection Preventionist was revealed. On 1/28/25 at 9:04 a.m., director of nursing (DON) stated he was currently the acting facility infection preventionist and was responsible for overseeing the infection control program. DON verified he had not completed specialized training for infection prevention and control. and no staff were currently enrolled in any specialized training at this time nor had any specialized infection control education scheduled. A facility policy titled Infection Preventionist, revised 7/2024, indicated the following: Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. The facility's infection control policies and procedures apply to all personnel, consultants, contractors, residents, visitors, volunteer workers and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-03 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurately coded for 5 of 7 residents (R1, R6, R7, R10, R11) reviewed for inaccurate MDS assessments. Findings include: R1 - Activity Preferences R1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, or an assessment to determine a person's mental status) score of 11, indicating mild cognitive impairment. Additionally, the MDS indicated she had clear speech with the ability to make herself understood and was able to understand others. The MDS reported the interview for daily and activity preferences should not be conducted because R1 was rarely/never understood and family/significant other was not available. The MDS indicated staff assessed R1 regarding her daily and activities preferences and identified R1 preferred participating in her favorite activities and doing things in groups of people. The MDS identified diagnoses of anxiety, bipolar disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-03 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a level II pre-admission screen and resident review (PASARR) was completed prior to admission for 4 of 5 residents (R7, R9, R10, R11) reviewed who required a level II PASARR screening for mental illness. Findings include: R7: R7's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated she had intact cognition and no hallucinations or delusions with no reported behavioral symptoms. The MDS reported diagnoses including depression and alcohol dependence. Additionally, the MDS reported R7 was not currently considered by the state level II preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition. An admission record dated 11/13/24, indicated R7 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R7's Minnesota Senior Linkage Line preadmission screening results dated 11/21/24, identified a Level II assessment for mental illness was required prior to her admission to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-03 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to serve food according to a menu, and review changes to a menu with a qualified dietician or other qualified nutrition professional. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the menu met the nutritional needs of residents with a cardiac diet and other diets for 5 of 5 residents (R1, R2, R3, R5, R10) reviewed for dietary recommendations. Findings include: R1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had mild cognitive impairment. The MDS identified diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia (condition where there are high levels of fats in the blood), anxiety, bipolar disorder (a chronic mental health disorder characterized by extreme mood swings between extreme periods of elevated moods, or mania, and extreme low moods, or depression), schizophrenia (a chronic mental health illness that affects a person's thoughts, perceptions, emotions, and behaviors), and mild intellectual disabilities (a developmental disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment was completed and implemented using the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process as specified by CMS for 1 of 3 (R7) residents reviewed for trauma-informed care in addition to 1 of 5 residents (R7) reviewed for psychotropic medications. Findings include: R7's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated she had intact cognition and no hallucinations or delusions with no reported behavioral symptoms. The MDS reported diagnoses including depression and alcohol dependence, however, did not identify a post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis. The MDS reported R7 took antidepressant medications and antipsychotic medications on a routine basis only. R7's Care Area Assessment (CAA) for psychosocial well-being dated 11/7/24, indicated R7 reported feeling lonely and that her mood and/or behavior impacted her interpersonal relationships or arose from social isolation. The CAA identified R7 took…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) program by incorporating recommendations from the PASARR level II determination and the PASARR evaluation report into the care plan for 1 of 6 (R6) reviewed for PASARRs. Findings include: R6's modification of annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated she was not currently considered by the state to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition. The MDS indicated she had intact cognition, did not exhibit physical or verbal behaviors directed towards herself or others, but did report hallucinations and delusions during the lookback period. R6's MDS included diagnoses of schizophrenia (a chronic mental health illness that affects a person's thoughts, perceptions, emotions, and behaviors), alcohol dependence in remission, insomnia (a sleeping disorder), history of cocaine abuse, and encephalopathy (a medical condition that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to review and revise the activities care plan with input from the resident and/or resident representative for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed for activities. Findings include: R1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, or an assessment to determine a person's mental status) score of 11, indicating mild cognitive impairment. Additionally, the MDS indicated she had clear speech with the ability to make herself understood and was able to understand others. The MDS reported the interview for daily and activity preferences should not be conducted because R1 was rarely/never understood and family/significant other was not available. The MDS indicated staff assessed R1 regarding her daily and activities preferences and identified R1 preferred participating in her favorite activities and doing things in groups of people. The MDS identified diagnoses of anxiety, bipolar disorder (a chronic mental health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to evaluate a resident's discharge needs or develop a discharge plan to ensure an appropriate discharge location could accommodate resident medical, mental health, oncology, cancer care, and medication needs for 1 of 1 residents (R12) who was discharged to a location where it was unknown if they could meet R12's needs. Findings include: R12's discharge return not anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R12 had a planned discharge to a home/community setting, had intact cognition, mild depression, no behaviors, and was independent with activities of daily living. The MDS identified diagnoses of major depressive disorder, alcohol dependence, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, history of suicide attempt, and a history of other psychoactive substance abuse. The MDS indicated antipsychotic and antibiotic medication use. The MDS indicated there was not an active discharge plan in place for R12 to return to the community, and R12 did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure individualized activities were provided for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed for activities. Findings include: R1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, or an assessment to determine a person's mental status) score of 11, indicating mild cognitive impairment. Additionally, the MDS indicated she had clear speech with the ability to make herself understood and was able to understand others. The MDS reported the interview for daily and activity preferences should not be conducted because R1 was rarely/never understood and family/significant other was not available. The MDS indicated staff assessed R1 regarding her daily and activities preferences and identified R1 preferred participating in her favorite activities and doing things in groups of people. The MDS identified diagnoses of anxiety, bipolar disorder (a chronic mental health disorder characterized by extreme mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate blood pressure monitoring and order was in place for 1 of 5 residents (R3) observed during morning medication administration. Findings include: R3's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R3 had intact cognition, delusions, and no behaviors or rejection of care. The MDS indicated R3 was independent with activities of daily living, had diagnoses of orthostatic hypotension (drop in blood pressure when standing up or sitting down), hyperlipidemia (condition where there are high levels of fats in the blood), depression, and schizophrenia, and medications included antipsychotics and antidepressants. R3's medication and treatment administration record for January 2025, indicated R3 had the following orders: -9/13/23, Midodrine HCL 2.5 milligram (mg) tablet and instructed staff to give [ONE] [TABLET] BY MOUTH TWICE DAILY - HOLD FOR B/P [blood pressure] 110 MMHG [MILLIMETERS OF MERCURY] BUT GIVE IF [R3] IS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-03 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to identify triggers to avoid potential re-traumatization and failed to develop and implement the comprehensive care plan to include individualized trauma-informed approaches for 1 of 2 resident (R7) who had a history of trauma. Findings include: R7's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated she had intact cognition and no hallucinations or delusions with no reported behavioral symptoms. The MDS reported diagnoses including depression and alcohol dependence, however, did not identify a post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis. R7's Care Area Assessment (CAA) for psychosocial well-being dated 11/7/24, identified R7 took psychotropic medications mirtazapine and fluoxetine (antidepressants) to treat depression. Additionally, the CAA identified she utilized non-pharmacologic interventions such as crafting activities, sitting outside on the front porch, smoking cigarettes, and minimal socializing to manage anxiety symptoms. The CAA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication order included an end date or a documented clinical rationale for 1 of 1 residents (R7) reviewed for PRN psychotropic medications. Findings include: R7's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated she had intact cognition and no hallucinations or delusions with no reported behavioral symptoms. The MDS reported diagnoses including depression and alcohol dependence. The MDS reported R7 took antidepressant medications and took antipsychotic medications on a routine basis only. R7's Care Area Assessment (CAA) for psychotropic drug use dated 11/7/24, identified she took an antidepressant, a mood stabilizer, and scheduled antipsychotic medication, however, lacked documentation of her as needed (PRN) antipsychotic medication. R7's signed order summary was requested but not received. R7's medication administration record (MAR) dated 1/25 reflected the following active physician orders: -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was scheduled for a minimum of eight hours per day. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 13 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility Staffing Schedules dated 10/1/2023, through 11/30/23, revealed the facility lacked eight hours of RN coverage for the following dates in 2023: 10/1, 10/7, 10/8, 10/14, 10/15, 10/21, 10/22, 10/28, 10/29, 11/4, 11/5, 11/11, 11/12. 11/18, 11/19, 11/25, 11/26. Review of the Southside Care Center Weekly Staffing posting revealed the facility lacked RN hours on the following dates in 2023: 10/1, 10/7, 10/8, 10/14, 10/15, 10/21, 10/22, 10/28, 10/29, 11/4, 11/5, 11/11, 11/12. 11/18, 11/19, 11/26. During interview on 11/29/23 at 2:49 p.m. the administrator stated they tried to hire staff, but it was difficult to find anyone who was willing to work weekends. They confirmed they did not have any staffing waivers, and the facility did not always have an RN on duty for eight hours each day.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper sanitization of dishware used for meal preparation and resident service when 1 of 1 high-temperature commercial dishwashers was identified as not reaching adequate wash and final rinse temperature (i.e., 150 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and 180 degrees F, respectively). This had the potential to affect all 12 residents within the nursing facility and staff who consumed food in the main production kitchen. Findings include: A facility document titled Dishwasher Temperature Logs dated 11/2023, indicated dishwasher temperatures were tracked after each meal. The log further indicated 14 of 29 days lacked any documentation of dishwasher temperatures. On 11/28/23 12:36 p.m., an initial kitchen tour was completed with cook (CK)-A present. A single Ecolab commercial dishwasher was located next to a two-sided sink. The dishwasher had two digital thermometer readouts on the door: one reading wash and one rinse. Hanging out of the top closed dishwasher door was a dripping-wet towel. Inside cabinet doors under…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan assuring care and services were identified to maintain acceptable levels of performance and continual improvement. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 13 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's QAPI - Quality Assurrance and Performance Improvement - Quality Assurance Assessment policy date 11/4/22, indicated the plan included the policies and procedures to: 1. Identify and use data to monitor our performance 2. Establish goals and thresholds for our performance measurement 3. Utilize resident and staff ideas for improvement 4. Identify and prioritize problems and opportunities for improvement 5. Systematically analyze underlying causes of systemic problems and adverse events 6. Develop corrective action or performance improvement activities The the above policies and procedures were requested but not provided. When interviewed on 11/30/23, at 4:58 p.m., the administrator stated QAPI meeting were held…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee that was effective in identifying and responding to quality deficiencies, and developing procedures for feedback, data collection and monitoring systems. In addition, the facility failed to provide evidence of a Performance Improvement Project (PIP) which focused on high risk or problem-prone areas. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 13 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: Quality tracking data was requested from the facility but was not provided. The agendas for quality committee meetings 1/23 - 11/23, lacked identification adverse events and tracking of data-driven quality metrics or performance improvement projects (PIPs). During interview on 11/30/23 at 4:58 p.m., administrator stated a summary of care concerns was presented at QAPI meetings, however the facility did not track adverse events on a spreadsheet or by other means, and there was no method to monitor and track trends. They stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to implement their infection control program and prevent and control the onset and spread of COVID-19 to the highest extent possible when R10 tested positive for COVID-19. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure transmission-based precautions (TBP) were initiated for 6 of 6 residents (R10, R6, R5, R9, R1, R2) who tested positive for COVID-19. This had the potential to impact all residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R10 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of schizophrenia and anxiety. R10's nursing progress note dated 11/24/23, indicated R10 tested positive for COVID-19. R6's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R6 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of schizophrenia and depression. R5's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R5 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of schizophrenia and high blood pressure. R9's quarterly MDS dated [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident showers/bathtubs were sanitary for 1 of 2 resident bathrooms reviewed for a clean, homelike environment. R13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated she was cognitively intact, ambulatory, and showered independently. During interview on 11/27/23 at 7:51 a.m., R13 stated the bathtubs in both bathrooms did not get cleaned right and sometimes the residents had to clean them themselves before using them. R11's annual MDS dated [DATE], indicated she was cognitively intact, ambulatory, and showered independently. During interview on 11/27/23, at 8:29 p.m., R11 stated the bathrooms were really gross, and things didn't seem to be sanitized. During observation on 11/28/23 at 5:05 p.m., the shower curtain liner in the upstairs bathroom was streaked with large areas of orange, white, and dark brown substances within the folds as it hung on the bar. A dark brownish-black substance was noted along the bottom edge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-30 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 residents (R1, R12, R13) received education and were offered or received the pneumococcal vaccine in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations. In addition, the facility failed to obtain educated consent or refusal for 5 of 5 residents (R1, R3, R11, R12, R13) who were offered the influenza vaccine at the facility. Findings include: R1 R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], included R1 was age [AGE], had a diagnosis of seizure disorder, and indicated R1 received the influenza vaccine outside the facility and was not up to date with Pneumococcal vaccination due to a medical contraindication. R1's History of Communicable Diseases form indicated R1 had the PPSV23 vaccination on 9/29/21, and the influenza vaccine on 10/2/23. The CDC's PneumoRecs VaxAdvisor indicated for patients aged 65 and over who have not received PCV15 or PCV20, had a PPSV23 and did not have a PCV13, Give one dose of PCV15 or PCV…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to assess residents for the ability to self administer medications for 2 of 2 resident (R5 and R6) reviewed for medications at bedside. Findings include: R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R6 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of schizophrenia and depression. R6's medication administration record (MAR) dated 11/2023, indicated a scheduled morning medication pass of the following: -escitalopram oxalate 10 milligrams (mg) tablet (Lexapro) for depression. -fiber unboxed 625mg tablet (Fibercon) for constipation. -molnupiravir 800mg capsules (Lagevrio) for coronavirus 19 (COVID-19) infection. -midodrine hydrochloride (hcl) 2.5mg tablet (Proamatine) for low blood pressure. R6's treatment administration record (TAR) dated 11/2023, indicates R6 required monitoring of medication compliance as resident tried to hide medication in mouth or hand instead of taking it. R6's care plan dated 5/01/22, indicated R6 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurate for 3 of 5 residents (R2, R3, R13) reviewed for unnecessary medication. Findings include: R2's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 had diagnoses of schizophrenia and major depressive disorder. R2's MDS further indicated R2 was taking antianxiety and antidepressant medications. R2's MDS lacked a completed and accurate patient health questioner-9 (PHQ-9) assessment (an assessment used to determine severity of depression and used to monitor response to treatment). R3's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R3 had mild cognitive impairment and diagnoses of bipolar disorder and anxiety. R3's MDS further indicated R3 was taking anti-psychotic medication. R3's MDS lacked a completed and accurate PHQ-9 assessment. R13's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R13 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of bipolar disorder, depression and anxiety. R13's MDS further indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure individualized activities were provided for 2 of 2 residents (R11, R13) reviewed for activities. Findings include: R11's annual MDS dated [DATE], indicated they were cognitively intact and had a diagnosis of depression. R11 identified it was very important for her to do her favorite activities, and somewhat important to have reading material and do thing with groups of people. R11's care plan activity focus areas dated 11/20/22, indicated R11 did not want to participate in activities with interventions to modify daily schedule and treatment plan as needed to accommodate activity participation as requested by the resident, and identified R11's preferred activities were playing bingo, reading, listening to news in the morning, current events, watching football and reality television, and talking on the phone. R11's Care Conference Record dated 4/5/23, included preferred activities of medical appointments part-time work, friend…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess for and identify potential triggers to avoid re-traumatization for 1 of 1 resident (R13) who had a history of trauma. Findings include: R13's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated she was cognitively intact, had diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, depression, manic depression, psychotic disorder, and had delusions. The MDS identified R13 exhibited verbal symptoms (such as threatening, screaming, cursing) directed toward others daily, and often exhibited other behavioral symptoms such as self-injury and pacing on 1-3 of the previous seven days. R13 took antianxiety, antidepressant, hypnotic, antipsychotic, and opioid medications regularly. R13's Medical Diagnosis list printed 11/29/23, included (PTSD). R13's Care Area Summary dated 5/12/23, identified the Mood State and Behavioral Symptoms care areas were not triggered. R13's care plan revised 9/24/23, included mood and depression focus areas, however…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to assess for safety and appropriate use of bed rails, ensure alternate interventions were assessed and/or attempted, and failed to review risks and benefits of bed rails and obtain consent for 1 of 1 resident (R11) who was observed to have a bed rail affixed to their bed. Findings include: R13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated they were cognitively intact, used a walker and wheelchair for mobility, and were independent with bed mobility, standing, and transfers. R13 had diagnoses of high blood pressure, ankle fracture, anxiety, depression, bipolar psychotic disorder, and PTSD and lung disease. The MDS indicated bed rails were not in use. R13's care plan dated 9/4/23, lacked indication for the bed rail. R13's medical record lacked evidence of assessment for safety and use, discussion of risk and benefits, resident consent, and attempted alternatives prior to installation of the bed rail. During observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to assist 1 of 1 residents (R6) with denture pain to obtain an appointment for dental services. Findings include: R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R6 had intact cognition and diagnoses of disorder of teeth and supporting structures. Furthermore, R6's MDS identified R6 had broken or loosely fitting dentures as well as mouth or facial pain and discomfort with chewing. R6's dental Care Area Assessment (CAA) indicated R6 had infrequent gum pain that was relieved by removing dentures and will be care planned to maintain current level of functioning and minimize decline. R6's care plan dated 6/4/21, identified gum pain secondary to dentures. Interventions included removal of dentures when experiencing pain and use of medication to relieve pain. Additionally, R6's care plan indicated to notify R6's dentist if pain did not resolve. R6's care plan also identified that R6 had the potential for oral/dental health problems…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2026-04-06 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the required nurse staffing information was posted daily and contained required information, such as the daily census and total number of licensed nursing staff working. This had the potential to affect all 13 residents residing in the facility and/or visitors who may wish to view the information.Findings include:During an observation and record review on 4/1/26 at 8:08 a.m., the nurse staff posting was observed in a hallway between the dining room and the kitchen, attached to a bulletin board. The posting had five columns, including days of the week, shift, registered nurse (RN) hours, licensed practical nurse (LPN) hours, and the date. The posting did not include a daily census or the total number of licensed staff working every shift. The posting showed the following information:-on Monday 3/29/26: 16 hours worked during the day shift, no hours recorded for the PM shift, and 8 hours recorded for LPN hours for the night shift.-on Tuesday, 3/30/26: eight RN hours for the day shift, eight LPN hours…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-02-03 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the posted nurse staffing information accurately displayed the total number/actual hours worked by the licensed staff for each shift on a daily basis. This had the potential to affect all 11 residents or visitors who wished to review the information. Findings include: A weekly staffing post dated 1/1/25 - 1/7/25 included the facility's name, the date, census and total hours for registered nurses (RNs), licensed practical nurses (LPNs), and trained medication assistants (TMAs). The post lacked actual worked hours for RNs and LPNs. A weekly staffing post dated 1/8/25 - 1/14/25 included the facility's name, the date, census and total hours for registered nurses (RNs), licensed practical nurses (LPNs), and trained medication assistants (TMAs). The post lacked actual worked hours for RNs and LPNs. A weekly staffing post dated 1/15/25 - 1/21/25 included the facility's name, the date, census and total hours for registered nurses (RNs), licensed practical nurses (LPNs), and trained medication assistants (TMAs). The post…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in MN
CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 24E507. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.