Victory Health And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

29.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 79 beds and averages 70.3 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.10 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.33 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to perform complete and thorough investigations of allegations of abuse for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, R3) who were involved in resident-to-resident altercations. Findings include:A Nursing Home Incident Report (NHIR) dated 5/26/26 at 8:20 p.m., indicated at approximately 6:25 p.m., when R2 and R3 were both in the dining room, R2 struck R3 in the chest and face. Facility initiated 15-minute safety checks. The incident was witnessed by activity staff. A NHIR dated 5/26/26 at 10:30 p.m., indicated at 7:39 p.m., R2 and R1 were involved in a physical altercation in which R2 hit and scratched R1. Staff intervened and separated the residents, and staff performed monitoring and safety checks. Review of the investigative files on 6/1/26 of each of the two incidents revealed the investigations did not include interviews with other residents to ensure the other residents did not also have allegations of abuse by R2. During an interview on 6/2/26 at 12:09 p.m., the director of nursing (DON) stated during an investigation for abuse,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a safe environment was maintained and monitoring was implemented as indicated in the medical record for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R3), and as ordered for 1 of 3 residents (R2) after resident-to-resident altercations.Additionally, the facility failed to ensure ongoing assessment and monitoring for 2 of 2 residents (R1, R3) after R1 was hit and scratched by R2, and R3 was hit in the torso and slapped by R2, which had the potential to result in unmonitored decline for R1 and R3.Findings include:A Nursing Home Incident Report (NHIR) dated 5/26/26 at 8:20 p.m., indicated at approximately 6:25 p.m., when R2 and R3 were both in the dining room, R2 struck R3 in the chest and face. Facility initiated 15-minute checks. The incident was witnessed by activity staff. A NHIR dated 5/26/26 at 10:30 p.m., indicated at 7:39 p.m., R2 and R1 were involved in a physical altercation in which R2 hit (did not indicate where ) and scratched R1. Staff intervened and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY F880Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to store soiled linens, and transport linens to prevent the spread of infection. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents whose personal laundry was done at facility.Findings include: An observation on 1/14/26 at 8:16 a.m., laundry assistant (LA) carried an arm load of clean laundry on hangers, draped over arm, up against scrubs and brought into an unidentified resident's room.An observation on 1/14/26 at 8:19 a.m., on the outside laundry room door, a yellow sign stated: NURSING STAFF 1. Soiled linen MUST be bagged and taken to laundry room. Placed in proper container/bin, at the end of every shift. 2. Outgoing laundry must be put in blue bag, placed in proper bin in soiled room [ROOM NUMBER]. DO NOT put any soiled linens on the floor. Inside of the laundry room, there were large containers for facility laundry, empty blue fabric bags on a table, and two filled blue bags sitting on the floor in front of containers. There were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — pattern
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to allow active resident and resident representative participation in the development and review of care plans for 4 of 4 residents, (R3, R25, R30, R14) reviewed for care planning and coordination of services while residing at the facility. Findings include: R3 R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition, no adverse behaviors, and was dependent on staff for wheelchair mobility. R3's medical record identified the most recent care conference was held on 8/20/25, and no additional care conferences were held. R3 had an additional quarterly MDS completed on 11/9/25, There was no indication in the progress notes or medical record of any care conference held at the time of this assessment. During an interview on 1/13/26 at 8:22 a.m., R3's representative (RR)-A stated he was not invited to a recent care conference, and he had concerns about communication with the facility. R25 R25's quarterly MDS dated [DATE],…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to obtain and document an informed consent including explanation of risk and benefits, for 1 of 1 newly admitted resident (R80) reviewed for use of psychotropic medications.Findings include:R80's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition, no adverse behaviors and moderately severe depression. R80 was dependent on staff for bed mobility and had a diagnosis of complete paraplegia (complete loss of sensation and movement from the chest down). Medications included antianxiety and antidepressant.R80's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 12/30/25 through 12/31/25, identified alprazolam (antianxiety medication) 1 milligram (mg) by mouth as needed (PRN) for anxiety was given twice on 12/31/25, and documented as E which meant effective.R80's MAR dated 1/1/26 through 1/15/26, identified PRN alprazolam was given twice on 1/1/26, twice on 1/4/26, once on 1/5/26, twice on 1/6/25, once on 1/7/26, once on 1/8/26 and once on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to follow standards of practice to provide resident education and update the provider for 1 of 1 resident (R33) who routinely refused their diuretic medication.Findings include:R33's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition, no adverse behaviors, was independent with meals and hygiene and had a diagnosis of chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure (CHF).R33's care plan dated 11/8/25, identified he was on a diuretic medication related to CHF. Interventions included administer diuretic medications as ordered by physician and monitor/document/report adverse reactions to diuretic therapy.R33's orders identified start date of 2/20/25, for bumetanide 1 milligram (mg) tablet, give two tablets two times a day related to CHF.R33's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 11/1/25 through 11/30/25, identified bumetanide was refused 45 out of 60 opportunities. The MAR dated 12/1/25 through 12/31/25, identified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to communicate with a resident's emergency family contact when they were hospitalized and subsequently discharged from the facility for 1 of 2 residents (R1) reviewed for discharge process.Findings include:R1's electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 9/13/25.R1's progress note, dated 9/13/25, indicated R1 was not redirectable and walking towards traffic and sent to the emergency department (ED) due to safety concern to self.R1's EMR lacked any evidence the facility communicated with R1's family about any potential safety concerns, his hospitalization, and discharge from the facility. During an interview on 11/10/25 at 9:50 a.m., R1's emergency contact and family member (FM)-A stated she was not informed of any incidents regarding R1 walking outside in traffic and was never informed he was hospitalized . FM-A stated she arrived at the facility on a Wednesday or Thursday to bring R1 some…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a written notice of transfer and bed hold was given to a resident and/or their family upon hospitalization for 1 of 2 residents (R1) reviewed for discharge. Findings include:R1's electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 9/13/25.R1's progress note, dated 9/13/25, indicated R1 was not redirectable and walking towards traffic and sent to the emergency department (ED) due to safety concern to self.R1's EMR lacked any evidence R1 and/or family had received a written notice of transfer and information on the facility's bed hold policy when R1 was hospitalized on [DATE].During an interview on 11/10/25 at 9:50 a.m., R1's emergency contact and family member (FM)-A stated she was not informed when R1 was sent to the hospital, did not received a written notice of transfer or any information on the facility bed hold policy.During an interview on 11/10/25 at 11:12 a.m., the facility social worker…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a self-administration of medications assessment was completed for 1 of 1 resident (R2) observed with medication at their bedside.Findings include:R2's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated intact cognition with diagnoses included morbid obesity and asthma.R2's self-administration of medications assessment dated [DATE] indicated R2 did not want to self-administer any medicationsR2's current provider orders on 10/21/25 included albuterol sulfate inhalation solution. 1 puff inhale orally every 4 hours as needed for shortness of breath due to asthma. R2's care plan dated 9/8/25 did not identify R2 did not identify a focus and/or interventions for self-administration of medication. During an observation and interview on 10/21/25 at 12:41 p.m., an inhaler was observed in a bowl on R2's bedside table. R2 stated he kept the inhaler next to his bed so he could use it as needed a couple of times a week. R2 did not tell…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to accommodate resident needs by ensuring call light buttons were within reach for 1 of 2 (R3) residents reviewed for call light usage.Findings include:R3 quarterly minimum date set (MDS) date 7/31/25 indicated severe cognitive impairment with diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type and catatonic schizophrenia.R3's care plan dated 9/8/25 instructed to be sure resident's call light is within reach and encourage resident to use it.During an observation and interview on 10/20/2025 at 2:41 p.m., R3 was lying in her bed. A cord was coming out of the wall near the head of the bed, but no call button was observed. R3 stated she did not have a call button. If she needed help, she would wave at staff as they walked by or would say help me. During an observation and interview on 10/20/2025 at 2:51 p.m. licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A confirmed R3's call light was lying on the floor under her bed. LPN-A stated the call light should have been attached to R3's bed where she could reach it. Resident's call…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $620K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN