No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hope Springs At Minnetonka

16913 Highway 7, Minnetonka, MN 55345 · For profit - Individual · 21 certified beds · (952) 474-4474 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (952) 474-4474 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0567)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)$9,496 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (12% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $9,496 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-20)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4848 County Road 101 · (952) 401-3814 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4950 County Road 101 · (952) 938-3566 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Cub0.3 mi
4801 County Road 101 · (952) 938-1404 · Call to confirm hours
Park
17500 Excelsior Blvd · (952) 988-8400 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
16205 Highway 7 · (952) 935-2425

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.0%18.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.2%4.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder7.8%1.9%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.5%2.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms14.9%4.1%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.7%4.0%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.6%20.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication53.1%12.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%5.2%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.6%24.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table47.6%17.1%17.1%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

RN hours/ resident / day
LPN hours/ resident / day
Aide hours/ resident / day
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
RN hoursweekends
12.5%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 21 beds and averages 20.1 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.10 on weekdays — 32% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 12% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-04)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-14)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to submit accurate data for staffing information, including agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data during 1 of 1 quarter reviewed (Quarter 1 2026) to the centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) according to specifications established by CMS. This had the potential to affect all 21 residents living in the facility.Findings include:Review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) [NAME] Report 1705D for quarter 1 2026 (October 1st through December 31st), identified the metric for excessively low weekend staffing, and failure to have licensed nursing coverage for 24/hours a day had been triggered for the facility on the following days: 10/1/25, 10/11/25, 11/28/25, 11/29/25, 12/28/25, 12/29/25.Review of the facility's schedule and nursing staff census sheets for quarter 1 2026, indicated the facility did in fact have appropriate coverage on the weekends and 24 hours licensed coverage, however, indicated incorrect data had been reported for the PBJ to CMS. On 6/4/26 at 1026 a.m., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings were held on a quarterly basis. This had the potential to affect all 21 residents residing at the facility.Findings include:On 6/3/26 at 9:17a.m., The last 3 meeting minutes for QAPI had been requested via email, one of the three requested was provided for April 6th. The other two meeting minutes requested were requested again on 6/3/26 at 12:30 p.m., 6/3/26 at 3:45 p.m., and 6/4/26 at 8:40a.m., Neither were provided.On 6/4/26 at 12:38 p.m., the Director of nursing (DON) stated the facility had not conducted their QAPI meeting in January, had planned to reschedule the meeting, however, were unable to. Furthermore, the DON stated they had met in the fall, however, were unable to open the notes. The opportunity was presented for them to resend them or send in another format. The document was never provided.The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan last updated 6/19/2024, indicated the QAPI concerns, updates, or changes are to be reviewed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to obtain informed consents including risk and benefit for 1 of 5 residents (R11) reviewed for psychotropic medications.Findings include:R11's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R11 was admitted [DATE], was severely cognitively impaired and had the following diagnoses: Hyperlipidemia (HLD) (high levels of fat in the blood), Alzheimer's Disease, non-Alzheimer's Dementia, anxiety, and schizophrenia. R11's Order Summary Report dated 6/3/26, indicated R11 was currently prescribed Clozaril (anti-psychotic) start date 10/20/25, Lexapro (anti-depressant) start date 5/7/2018, lorazepam (antianxiety) start date 8/19/2026, and Olanzapine (anti-psychotic) start date 10/20/25.R11's medical record lacked evidence of informed consents regarding risk and benefits for any of the above listed medications being completed.On 6/3/26 at 11:42 a.m., the director of nursing (DON) stated they were responsible for completing the consents for psychotropics.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to obtain diagnostic testing related to recommendations from a speech language pathology (SLP) evaluation for 1 of 1 resident (R11) reviewed for SLP recommendations.Findings include:R11's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R11 was admitted [DATE], was severely cognitively impaired and had the following diagnoses: Hyperlipidemia (HLD) (high levels of fat in the blood), Alzheimer's Disease, non-Alzheimer's Dementia, anxiety, and schizophrenia. The Speech Language Pathology Initial Evaluation and Treatment Telehealth visit dated 12/11/25, indicated a referral had been made by R11's primary care provider (PCP) to SLP for evaluation. The report indicated R11 had the diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and the need for instrumental imaging of swallow and was required to provide intervention for decreased aspiration and choking risk, and improve the residents quality of life.The Speech Language Pathology discharge report dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report a COVID-19 outbreak in their facility. This had the potential to affect all 21 residents in the facility, staff, and visitors.Findings include:According to the Minnesota Department of Health website (MDH) https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/coronavirus/hcp/report.html, SARS-CoV-2 Infection (COVID-19) must be reported to MDH within one working day.The Quarterly infection Control Log undated, indicated one staff member (LPN-A) tested positive for COVID-19 on 5/2/25 and one resident R7 tested positive for COVID-19 on 5/3/26. The facility provided evidence that the staff was sent home and R7 was put on precautions. However, no evidence was provided to show the outbreak was reported to state officials per regulations.On 6/3/26 at 2:28 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility had a COVID-19 outbreak of one staff and 1 resident, and furthermore, it was never reported to MDH. The DON stated the task of reporting was previously done by a recently retired staff member, and the task of reporting had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was scheduled for a minimum of eight consecutive hours per day. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 21 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: The PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report triggered for no continuous 8-hour RN coverage in 24-hour period for four or more days within 4th quarter. Infraction dates were 7/17/24, 7/18/24, 7/24/24, 7/26/24, 9/21/24 and 9/22/24. Document review of the schedule from 10/1/24 - 2/9/25, identified the facility failed to have RN coverage for the dates of: 11/9/24, 11/10/24, 11/28/24, 11/29/24, 12/21/24, 12/25/24, 1/1/25, 1/18/25 and 1/20/25. During interview on 2/10/25 at 9:37 a.m., R12 stated no concerns were reported in resident council. R12 stated the facility was staffed very well with knowledgeable and well-established staff. During interview on 2/13/25 at 1:03 p.m., director of nursing (DON) indicated they were responsible for staffing the facility and submitting the PBJ reports. They confirmed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure cups were completely dry before storing and stacked bowls stayed dry to prevent bacterial growth. In addition, the facility failed to ensure food items were properly labeled and dated, failed to ensure staff covered their hair, assess food temperature during food prep, and to ensure staff followed appropriate infection control technique during food service. This had potential to affect all 21 residents who were served food from the kitchen. Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour on 2/10/25 at 12:26 p.m., a refrigerator in the main kitchen had sliced cheese with no opened date or expiration date and half of Smithfield boneless ham wrapped in plastic with expiration date of February 26, 2025 and no opened date. The freezer in the main kitchen area had a few packages of bratwurst unlabeled and not dated, multiple packaged tortillas with no label or date, and a packaged cheese omelet with white flakes with no date on them. The clean dish area had four stacks of clean cups, and multiple cups…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to maintain documentation and demonstrate evidence of a comprehensive, data-driven quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) program. These findings had potential to affect all 21 residents residing within the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 2/13/25 at 2:49 the director of nursing (DON) stated the QA committee, consisting of herself, the administrator and the medical director, met quarterly to review adverse events. However, the committee did not have a system to identify, collect and use data from all departments and had not identified any opportunities for improvement or performance improvement projects to implement. The DON further stated the facility did not record any meeting minutes or documentation of their ongoing QA meetings. A facility policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), dated 6/19/24, indicated, QA [quality assurance] and PI [performance improvement] combine to form QAPI, a comprehensive approach to ensuring high quality care. QAPI concerns, updates, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-14 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance (QA) committee identified and implement performance improvement projects to address any identified concerns. These findings had potential to affect all 21 residents residing within the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 2/13/25 at 2:49 the director of nursing (DON) stated the QA committee, consisting of herself, the administrator and the medical director, met quarterly to review adverse events. However, the committee did not have a system to identify, collect and use data from all departments and had not identified any opportunities for improvement or performance improvement projects to implement. A facility policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), dated 6/19/24, indicated, a Performance Improvement Project (PIP) is a concentrated effort on a particular problem in one area of the facility or facility wide; it involves gathering information to clarify issues or problems, and intervening for improvements. The facility conducts PIPs to examine and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance (QA) committee consisted of the minimum required members. These findings had potential to affect all 21 residents residing within the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 2/13/25 at 2:49 p.m., the director of nursing (DON) stated the committee, consisting of herself (also the infection preventionist), the administrator and the medical director, met quarterly to review adverse events. The DON confirmed the QA did not consist of at least two additional staff members to meet the required members however, they had discussed having a nursing assistant join the committee. A facility policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), dated 6/19/24, indicated, members of the team will include the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON), the medical director and other key staff members from other departments, along with a designated resident as designated by the Resident Council if they wish to participate, and family or guardians if they wish to participate.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded to reflect correct medication use for 5 of 5 residents (R1, R3, R6, R9, and R15). Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual (RAI Manual), dated 10/2024, indicated medications are to be indicated as taken by a resident based on pharmacological classification, not how it is used. The RAI Manual further indicated herbal and alternative medicine products are considered to be dietary supplements by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These products are not regulated by the FDA (e.g., they are not reviewed for safety and effectiveness like medications) and their composition is not standardized (e.g., the composition varies among manufacturers). Therefore, they should not be counted as medications (e.g., melatonin). R1 R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 was admitted to the care facility 7/24/23 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure residents who self-administered topical medications creams were assessed for safe and appropriate use for 2 of 3 residents (R11 and R15) reviewed for self-administration of medications. Findings include: R11: R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R11 was admitted to the care facility on 4/6/23 and was cognitively intact. R11's Orders, indicated R11 had an order for Betamethasone Valerate External Cream 0.1% (a steroid cream used to help relieve redness, itching, swelling, or other discomfort caused by skin conditions), apply to affected skin as needed for rash unsupervised self-administration. Apply to affected skin twice daily PRN [as needed] for rash up to five days a month and two times a day for rash for two weeks. R11's care plan, dated 6/26/24, indicated for staff to provide medications as ordered, including Betamethasone cream PRN for rash outbreaks. R11's electronic medical record (EMR) indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure food preferences were honored for 1 of 1 resident (R4) reviewed for choices related to food. Findings include: R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R4 had intact cognition, disorganized thinking, verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others, and did not reject cares. R4 required supervision or touching assistance with eating and was independent with most activities of daily living. R4 had diagnoses of orthostatic hypotension (condition where blood pressure drops when standing up from a sitting or lying position), dementia and schizophrenia (chronic mental illness characterized by disruptions in through process, perceptions, emotions, and social interactions). R4's oral intake care plan revised 12/13/24, indicated R4 had potential for inadequate oral intakes related to history of varying appetite secondary to mental health and had been hospitalized for not eating and weight loss. Care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure provider orders code status [e.g. full code or do not resuscitate (DNR)] were updated, consistent, and accurate throughout the resident's medical record for 1 of 4 residents (R4) reviewed for advance directives. Findings include: R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R4 was admitted to the care facility on [DATE]. The MDS indicated R4 had intact cognition, disorganized thinking, verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others, and diagnoses including orthostatic hypotension (condition where blood pressure drops when standing up from a sitting or lying position), dementia and schizophrenia (chronic mental illness characterized by disruptions in through process, perceptions, emotions, and social interactions). R4's care plan dated [DATE], lacked documentation of code status. R4's Health Care Directive dated [DATE], indicated they did not want CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation; emergency procedure which combined chest…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a process for missing clothing was followed and residents received appropriate follow up after reporting concerns of missing clothing for 3 of 5 residents (R1, R4, and R9) reviewed for personal property. Findings include: R1: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 was admitted to the care facility 7/24/23 and was cognitively intact. During an interview on 2/11/25 at 8:41 a.m., R1 stated missing clothing was a common occurrence in the facility and she was currently missing a blue hoody. R1 confirmed she had let the facility nursing assistants (NA) know but had not received any follow up. R5: R5's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R5 was admitted to the care facility 10/1/24 and was cognitively intact. During an interview on 2/12/25 at 8:54 a.m., R5 stated she had not been getting all of her clothing back after getting it washed and was currently missing a pair of jeans, socks, and underwear. R5 stated she had told…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to assess and monitor skin alterations for 1 of 2 residents (R8) reviewed for skin integrity. Furthermore, the facility failed to follow up with urology after several urinary tract infection and failed to comprehensively monitor and assess (i.e bladder scanning to assess for urine retention, proactive UTI assessments or assessing if R3 required more assistance with toileting or bathing) to timely treat, if needed, and prevent hospitalization for 1 of 1 resident (R3) reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R3 was cognitively intact and was independent with most activities of daily living and required set up assistance with bathing. R3's progress notes dated 8/6/24 - 2/12/25, indicated R3 had three UTIs in the past six months resulting in two hospitalizations and was displaying current UTI symptoms. On 8/6/24 it was documented R3 had complaints of strong smelling/cloudy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who wished to smoke off facility grounds was properly assessed for safety, and risks of unsupervised smoking were discussed for 1 of 1 resident (R5) reviewed for smoking. The facility further failed to ensure residents at risk for falls were assessed for a root cause and new interventions were put in place to prevent falls for 2 of 3 residents (R10 and R8) reviewed for falls. Findings include: R5 R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R5 was cognitively intact. The MDS further indicated R5 utilized a walker for locomotion and was independent with most activities of daily living (ADLs) except bathing. R5's progress note, dated 1/6/25, indicated R5 asked staff if it was okay for her to go outside and walk down the trail. Staff assured R5 it was okay as long as staff knew where she was. That afternoon R5 came back to facility smelling of smoke. R5 confirmed she was aware the care facility was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess pain and attempt non-pharmacological pain interventions for 1 of 1 resident (R11) receiving multiple medications for pain. Findings include: R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R11 was cognitively intact and had pain almost constantly that frequently effected sleep and day to day activities. The MDS further indicated R11 had received pain medication during the look back period however had not received any non-pharmacological pain interventions. R11's Orders, printed on 2/13/25, indicated R11 received several medications for pain including Ajovy (used to prevent migraine headaches) 225 milligram (mg)/1.5 milliliters (ml) inject subcutaneously once a month for intractable migraines, alpha-lipoic acid (used in alternative medicine to aide treating nerve pain) 300mg by mouth two times a day for polyneuropathy (a condition where multiple peripheral nerves throughout the body become damaged or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure alternate interventions were assessed and/or attempted, risks and benefits of bed assist devices were reviewed, and consent was obtained for 1 of 2 residents (R9) reviewed for bed assist devices. Furthermore, the facility failed to remove a bed assist device or re-evaluate its use after an assessment indicated the bed assist device was not needed for 1 of 2 residents (R14) reviewed for bed assist devices. Findings include: R9 R9's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R9 had moderately impaired cognition, inattention, disorganized thinking, hallucinations, delusions, verbal and other behaviors, and rejected cares. R9 had no upper or lower extremity impairments and used a walker. R9 required partial and/or moderate assistance for dressing and supervision for footwear application and removal, toileting, personal and oral hygiene, and ambulation. The MDS indicated R9 had arthritis (general term for conditions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure orthostatic hypotension (characterized by a sudden drop in blood pressure that may lead to dizziness, lightheadedness, or fainting) was communicated the physician to ensure psychotropic medications (which can commonly cause orthostatic hypotension due to their effect on the body's blood vessels) did not need to be reduced to prevent falls, over sedation or complications for 1 of 5 residents (R3) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R3 was admitted to the care facility on 9/21/09 and was cognitively intact. R3's Diagnoses, printed 2/13/25, indicated R3 had several medical and mental health diagnoses including bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. R3's Orders indicated R3 was receiving several medications including Venlafaxine (an antidepressant medication which may cause orthostatic hypotension) 225 milligrams (mg) by mouth one time a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the appropriate, modified diet was given, and risks versus benefits of refusing a modified diet were discussed with 1 of 2 residents (R18) who had difficulty swallowing and recent coughing episodes after meals. Findings include: R18's quarterly [NAME] Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R18 was admitted to the care facility on 11/8/23, and was cognitively intact. The MDS further indicated R18 had coughing/choking episodes during meals. R18's Diagnoses, dated 11/7/23, indicated R18 had several medical diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. R18's Orders, dated 7/15/24, indicated an order for mechanical soft texture, regular consistency, easy to chew texture. R18's Care Plan, dated 11/24/23, and revised on 2/10/25, indicated R18 was able to feed himself and staff was to provide soft food and ground meat, indicating at times R18 would ask that his meat not be ground. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-16 · tag F0576 — widespread
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure mail was delivered to residents on Saturdays and also failed to ensure mail was delivered unopened to residents. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility who received personal mail, including but not limited to 2 of 12 residents (R5, R6) at the resident council meeting who verbally confirmed not receiving mail on Saturdays and that their personal mail was opened by the facility. Findings Include: During interview on 5/13/24 at 1:26 p.m., R5 stated staff were opening her mail and reading them and had been receiving her mail opened before it was delivered to her ongoing. R5 verbalized she did not like that her mail was being opened by the facility and had communicated to the facility that she wanted her mail delivered unopened. During interview on 5/15/24 at 2:30 p.m., R6 stated her personal mail was being delivered opened by the facility and that she had asked the facility not to open her mail however, this practice remained ongoing. During interview on 5/15/24 at 10:11 a.m., the administrative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse (RN) was scheduled for a minimum of eight consecutive hours per day. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 20 residents who resided in the facility. Finding include: Review of the facility PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report dated 10/1/23 - 12/31/23, identified the facility failed to have RN coverage for the dates of: 10/1/23, 10/14/23, 10/15/23, 10/16/23, 10/18/23, 10/19/23, 10/20/23, 10/21/23, 10/22/23, 10/24/23, 10/28/23, 11/04/23, 11/5/23, 11/11/23, 11/19/23, 11/23/23, 11/25/23, 11/26/23, 11/27/23, 11/29/23, 11/30/23, 12/1/23, 12/4/23, 12/6/23, 12/9/23, 12/10/23, 12/22/23, and 12/23/23. The undated, facility payroll sheets confirmed the facility did not have RN coverage for the dates of: 10/18/23, 10/19/23, 10/20/23, 10/21/23, 10/22/23, 11/4/23, 11/5/23, 11/19/23, 11/23/23, 11/29/23, 11/30/23, 12/1/23, 12/4/23, 12/6/23, 12/23/23. During interview on 5/14/24 at 11:26 a.m., RN-A stated the facility was required to have at least one RN on site every day, including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure frozen, refrigerated, and dry food items were properly stored, labeled, and dated and disposed of after expiration date. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure dishware was cleaned and sanitized in a manner to reduce the risk of foodborne illness. This had potential to affect all residents and staff who eat from the main kitchen. Findings include: Food storage During the initial kitchen observation on 5/13/24 at 12:46 p.m., the refrigerators in the main kitchen contained the following: - opened 2% [NAME] select white milk and skim vitamin a and d white milk with no opened date. - slices of circular meat wrapped in plastic wrap with no opened date or label identifying what the item was. - Hormel roast beef was opened and in a Ziplock bag. The Hormel bag read 5/23/24 as the prepare by or freeze date but did not have an open date. - an unopened tight sealed package of meat was thawing in a serving container with typed label of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data, during 1 of 1 quarter reviewed (Q1), to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) according to specifications established by CMS. Findings include: Review of the facility PBJ Staffing Data Report dated 10/1/23 - 12/31/23 (Q1), identified the facility failed to have RN coverage for the dates of: 10/1/23, 10/14/23, 10/15/23, 10/16/23, 10/18/23, 10/19/23, 10/20/23, 10/21/23, 10/22/23, 10/24/23, 10/28/23, 11/04/23, 11/5/23, 11/11/23, 11/19/23, 11/23/23, 11/25/23, 11/26/23, 11/27/23, 11/29/23, 11/30/23, 12/1/23, 12/4/23, 12/6/23, 12/9/23, 12/10/23, 12/22/23, and 12/23/23. The report also indicated the facility failed to have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours per day on the following dates: 10/12/23, 10/17/23, 11/4/23, 11/19/23, 12/23/23, and 12/29/23. In addition, the report identified the facility was triggered for low weekend staffing. Review of the facilities undated payroll sheets indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan assuring care and services were identified to maintain acceptable levels of performance and continual improvement, and failed to conduct ongoing quality assessment and assurance activities, develop, and implement appropriate plans of action to correct repeated quality deficiencies identified during the survey the facility was aware of or should have been aware of which had the potential to adversely affect all 20 residents which resided in the facility. Findings include: The facility's QAPI meeting minutes, attendance, and evidence of the facility's ongoing performance improvement projects (PIPs) was requested, however not received. During interview with director of nursing and administrator on 5/16/24 at 2:30 p.m., the administrator stated the facility held quarterly QAPI meetings but had not developed any performance improvement projects and did not have any formal documentation relating to the correction of previous and repeated quality…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop an infection prevention control program that included written standards, policies and procedures that included when and to whom possible incidents of communicable disease or infections should be reported, when and how transmission-based precautions (TBP) and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) should be implemented to prevent infections, hand hygiene procedures to be followed by staff involved in direct resident care and a process fpr surveillance and monitoring of infection control practices were implemented by staff. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure the antibiotic stewardship protocol included a system to monitor antibiotic use. This had the potential to affect all 20 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: The facility's policy titled Infection Control revised 6/2023, directed staff to follow to utilize infection control procedures related to standard precautions and droplet and airborne TBP. However, the policy lacked direction or procedure for EBP, contact precautions and enteric…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-16 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — widespread
    Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff were educated to standards, policies, and procedures of their infection control program. This had the potential to impact all 20 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: Staff education for infection control was requested however wasn't received. When interviewed on 5/15/24 at 12:32 p.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A stated if a resident had any signs of infection or change, they would alert the Director of Nursing (DON) and the provider. The provider would determine next steps. LPN-A stated there was not a specific way to monitor residents when they have an infection or when an antibiotic was used. LPN-A stated use of TBP would depend on how the infection spreads. LPN-A further stated when the DON was notified about the signs of an infection, she would direct us if any TBP were required and what should be done. LPN-A stated there had been an in-service on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) recently and wasn't sure about education about the policies and procedures. When interviewed on 5/15/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to assist the resident council in setting up regular meetings. This had the potential to affect 12 of 12 residents (R1, R2, R5, R6, R7, R9, R10, R12, R14, R17, R19, R20) who met to discuss resident council. Findings Include: Resident Council (RC) notes documentation indicated the following documented meetings: 4/5/24, 10/27/23, and 7/24/23, were the only meeting notes documented after 6/2023. During interview on 5/14/24 at 11:23 a.m., activity director (AD)- stated they was in charge of setting up resident council meetings but was on a medical leave from 11/2023, and returned in 3/2024, with no one else setting up and arranging resident council meetings in her absence. AD explained did not think about arranging RC meeting coverage in her absence but should have had someone else take the responsibility of setting up RC meetings monthly. AD- also verified RC meetings were not consistently being held monthly. During resident council (RC) meeting with surveyor on 5/15/24 at 2:30 p.m., R1, R2, R5, R6, R7, R9, R10, R12, R14, R17,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to petty cash, including on weekends, for 3 of 3 residents (R6, R10, R12) who had personal funds deposited with the facility. This had the potential to affect all 20 residents who utilized a personal funds account. Findings include: During interview on 5/13/24 at 2:40 p.m., R10 verified she had a personal account with the facility and stated the facility had allocated every Wednesday as money pass day and could only have access to personal funds during money pass on Wednesdays. R10 further stated she could not get money on the weekends or other days of the week. During interview on 5/13/24 at 4:33 p.m., R12 verified she had a personal account with the facility but that she only had access to the money on Wednesdays which was assigned by the facility as money pass day. R12 stated she could not access personal account funds on the weekends or other days of the week besides Wednesdays, when the facility would distribute money from resident account for the week as they needed. During interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included resident-specific interventions for 2 of 2 residents (R11, R19) reviewed for care planning. Findings include: R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R11 was cognitively intact, had diagnoses of chronic pain, constipation, bladder dysfunction, anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and schizophrenia. R11's Care Areas Assessment (CAA) dated 7/31/23, identified the following triggered concerns: Visual function Communication Indwelling catheter Psychosocial well-being Mood Activities Falls Nutritional status Dehydration/Fluid maintenance Pressure ulcer/injury Psychotropic drug use Pain Acitivies of daily living (ADL) functional/rehabilitation potential R11's care plan printed 5/15/24, lacked desired goals and person-centered interventions for visual function, communication, indwelling catheter, activities, dehydration/fluid maintenance, pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0696 — isolated
    Provide appropriate care/assistance for a resident with a prosthesis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide assistance and coordination of services to ensure timely referral and treatment for prosthetic fit for 1 of 1 resident (R17) reviewed who needed a prosthesis. Findings include: R17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated they were cognitively intact, used a wheelchair for mobility, and had diagnoses of vascular disease, diabetes, malnutrition, and right lower leg amputation. R17's admission Orders included R17 could walk with a walker up to 100 feet with modified independent and an order to remind R17 to put on right leg prosthesis between 10:00 a.m., and 11:30 a.m., daily. R17's provider Nursing Home Visit note dated 11/16/23, included, Per RN, patient has not been utilizing the R (right) leg prosthesis due to complaints of itchy/skin irritation. In addition, discussed with RN to follow up with prosthetic company regarding reassessing patient for prosthesis exchange. R17's New admission Appointment Referral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to act upon the consultant pharmacist's recommendation for 2 of 5 residents (R11, R15) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Furthermore, the consulting pharmacist failed to address duplicative medication orders for 1 of 5 residents (R9) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R11 was cognitively intact, had diagnoses of chronic pain, anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and schizophrenia, and did not take an opioid medication. R11's care plan dated 5/15/24, lacked identification of pain focus and opioid medication. R11's Order Summary Report dated 5/15/24, included an order for hydromorphone HCl (an opioid pain medication) 2 milligrams (mg) every three hours as needed for pain starting 11/17/23. R11's Medication Administration Records (MARs) for 1/1/24 - 5/15/24, indicated R11 had not taken any doses of hydromorphone during that time. R11's progress notes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure duplicative medications were not prescribed for 1 of 5 residents (R9) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R9's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R9 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder and chronic pain. A review of R9's provider orders indicated R9 had the following orders: -on 1/19/24, acetaminophen (non-narcotic pain medication) 325 milligrams (mg) give every for hours as needed (PRN)for pain was prescribed. There were no parameters for when to administer this dose. -on 1/19/24, acetaminophen 650mg give every 4 hours PRN for pain was prescribed. There were no parameters for this dose. -on 3/7/24, Tylenol (acetaminophen) 1000mg three times a day for chronic pain was prescribed. R9's medication administration record for 3/2024-5/13/24, indicated R9 had been currently using all Tylenol orders prescribed. When interviewed on 5/15/24 at 5:37 p.m., licensed practical nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure dental status was accurately assessed and routine dental services were provided for 1 of 2 residents (R6) reviewed for dental concerns. Findings include: R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated they were cognitively intact, had diagnoses of renal insufficiency or failure, diabetes mellitus, hemiplegia (a severe or complete loss of strength or paralysis on one side of the body), and hemiparesis (a mild loss of strength on one side of the body), The MDS indicated R6 was independent with oral hygiene and did not reject cares. R6's annual MDS dated [DATE], indicated R6 had no natural teeth and did not indicate loosely fitting dentures. R6's dental care area assessment was triggered but not provided. R6's care plan dated revised 4/9/24, indicated R6 was independent after set-up with oral hygiene and did not mention dentures. During interview on 5/13/24 at 7:08 p.m., R6 stated they told the facility they wanted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure influenza immunization were offered to 2 of 5 (R20, R11) residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: R20's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R20 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of bipolar disorder and depression. Furthermore, R20's MDS indicated no influenza vaccination was given this season and the influenza vaccine was not offered. R20's Minnesota Immunization Information Connection Report (MIIC) dated 1/11/24, indicated R20 had not received the influenza vaccine for the 2023-2024 season. R20's medical record lacked indication R20 had been offered, received or declined the influenza vaccination. R20's declination of influenza vaccination was requested however was not received. R11's MDS dated [DATE], indicated R11 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder and depression. Furthermore, R11's MDS indicated R11 had been offered and refused the influenza vaccination. R11's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-05-16 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure survey results were posted in a location visible and easily accessible to residents and visitors. This had the potential to affect all 20 residents residing in the facility and their visitors. Findings include: The facility's survey results were observed on 5/15/24 at 3:25 p.m., on the second floor at the nurse's station, in a folder tucked among several binders on the counter. The survey binder was not visible when entering the facility and was not accessible to residents or visitors as it was stored behind the nurses' station and not visible. During resident council meeting on 5/15/24 at 1:00 p.m., R1, R2, R5, R6, R7, R9, R10, R12, R14, R17, R19, R20, who had attended the meeting indicated they were not aware where the survey results were located and were interested in reading the survey results. On 5/15/24 at 3:35 p.m., The administrative assistant (AA) stated they were responsible to post the survey results in an accessible location. AA also stated they had previously placed the binder at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$9,496 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $2,659 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
  • $2,279 — penalty dated 2024-02-12
  • $4,558 — penalty dated 2024-01-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in MN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Minnesota
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,870/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,573/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245606. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next