St Clare Living Community Of Mora

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 63 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 47.3 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.96 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.36 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.22 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the code alert system (a wander management system to protect residents from elopement) was functioning properly, failed to follow manufacture recommendation for weekly testing, and failed to follow manufacture recommendations for inspection. This resulted in an immediate Jeopardy situation for two residents (R19, R12) who were at risk for elopement and were able to get through the main doors, due to failure of the doors to lock as required per the code alert system. In addition, the facility failed to adequately assess and develop care plans for residents identified at risk for elopement and wandering for 14 of 14 residents (R19, R12, R3, R4, R13, R17, R18, R22, R25, R28, R32, R34, R37, R46) who were assigned code alert devices and had the potential for elopement.The IJ began on [DATE] at 2:18 p.m., when R12 was able to exit the building due to code alert system malfunction. The administrator and director of nursing (DON) were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure accurate MDS coding of the use of a code alert device occurred for 14 of 14 residents (R3, R4, R12, R13, R17, R18, R19, R22, R25, R28, R32, R34, R37, R46) who were identified as at risk for elopement and wandering. Findings include:The code alert system log titled Wander Guard Monitor dated 4/2026, identified the following 14 residents as having a code alert device: R3, R4, R12, R13, R17, R18, R19, R22, R25, R28, R32, R34, R37, and R46.R3 was admitted on [DATE]. R3's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated R4 was severely cognitively impaired with a diagnosis of dementia neurocognitive Lewy body disease. MDS. Section P. indicated a wander guard alarm was not in use. Section E900 indicated R4 had not exhibited wandering. R3's care plan last reviewed on 3/16/26 lacked interventions for elopement and wandering.R4 was admitted on [DATE]. R4's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated R4 was severely cognitively impaired with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan with individualized elopement and wandering interventions with review and revision after subsequent MDS assessments or elopement status changes for 14 of 14 residents (R3, R4, R12, R13, R17, R18, R19, R22, R25, R28, R32, R34, R37, R46) who were identified as at risk for elopement and wandering. In addition, the facility failed to care plan necessary interventions for 3 of 3 residents (R7, R14, and R26) who were addressed for care planning.Findings include: The code alert system log titled Wander Guard Monitor dated 4/2026, identified 14 residents who had code alert devices: R3, R4, R12, R13, R17, R18, R19, R22, R25, R28, R32, R34, R37, and R46. R3 was admitted on [DATE]. R3's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated R4 was severely cognitively impaired with a diagnosis of dementia neurocognitive Lewy body disease. MDS. Section P. indicated a wander guard alarm was not in use. Section E900 indicated R4 had not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene and use of an ice scoop was followed during the snack pass. This deficient practice affected 3 of 3 residents (R29, R30, R7) and any other residents who received snacks during the snack pass. Finding include:R29's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified she was moderately cognitively intact and had diagnoses which included heart disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease.R30's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified she was moderately cognitively intact and had diagnoses which included heart failure (a chronic serious condition in which the heart muscle cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for oxygen), diabetes mellitus and depression.R7's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified he was moderately cognitively intact and had diagnoses which included heart failure and diabetes mellitus.During an observation on 4/29/26 at 1:56 p.m., nursing assistant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure resident preferences for nail care were honored for 1 of 1 resident (R8).Findings include:R8's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R8 was moderately cognitively impaired with the diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia, renal insufficiency, hypertension, and depression.R8's care plan last reviewed 3/26/26 indicated R8 had limited range of motion in their upper extremities and required an assist of 1 for daily bathing, weekly showers, daily grooming, oral care, and dressing.R8's progress notes indicated R8 had last had a shower on 4/3/26. Nail care was not addressed in progress notes.During an observation on 4/28/26 at 12:48 p.m., R8 was seated in wheelchair in room with their tv remote partially on their bedside table between their hands. Noted tremor in both hands, fingernails were long beyond tips of fingers. R8 stated they were trying to get their remote onto the bedside table, but their hands were so…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to monitor orthostatic blood pressures with the use of an antipsychotic medication for 4 of 5 residents (R1, R19, R7, and R13); failed to obtain signed consent with use of an antidepressant medication for 1 of 5 residents (R38); failed to implement other interventions before initiating antipsychotic medication for 1 of 5 (R38); failed to implement appropriate target behaviors for 1 of 1 resident (R1); and failed to have an appropriate diagnosis for 1 of 1 resident (R19) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R1 R1's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 had severe cognitive impairment, required extensive assististance with all activities of daily living (ADL's), and received antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. R1's dianoses included Alzheimers disease, age-related osteoporosis, anxiety, femur fracture, and repeated falls R1's physician orders included order for citalopram (antidepressant)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure correct use of personal protective equipment (PPE) to prevent the spread of COVID. This had the potential to affect all 4 residents, visitors and staff in short term stay unit. In addition, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive infection control program that incorporated virasurveillance ofl infections and illnesses not treated with antibiotics to reduce the risk of spreading infections to other residents in the facility. This has the potential to affect all 44 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: Mask and eye protection use During observation and interview on 2/10/25, at 1:58 p.m. registered nurse (RN)-A donned (put on) personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to entering COVID positive room. RN-A removed N95 mask from paper bag, placed on face then removed goggles from same paper bag, placed on face. RN-A stated that the facility had always reused the masks and goggles, placed inside paper bags when not in use. During observation on 2/11/25, at 10:10 a.m. overbed table was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were comprehensively assessed for self-administration of medications for 2 of 2 residents (R3, R10) reviewed and observed for self-administration of medications. Findings include: R3 R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R3 had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL)'s. R3's diagnoses included heart failure, chronic kidney disease, generalized anxiety disorder, chronic obstuctive pulmonary disease, encephalopathy, hypertension and type II diabetes mellitus and unspecified dementia with psychotic disturbance. R3's physician orders included order for Ipratropium bromide inhalation solution 0.02% - 0.5 mg(milligram) - Inhale 0.5 mg via neb twice daily related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. During observation on 2/11/25 at 8:29 a.m., R3 was sitting in her recliner holding the nebulizer mask to her face. Nebulizer cup contained a clear…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide smoking opportunities to promote quality of life and resident choice for 1 of 1 resident (R13) reviewed for choices. Findings Include: R13's Continuity of Care document (CCD) printed 2/11/25, included diagnosis of tobacco use, weakness and dementia without behavioral disturbance. R13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R13 had intact cognition. R13's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, hypertension, non-Alzheimer's dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia, unspecified mood disorder and peripheral vascular disease. R13's electronic health record (EHR) lacked evidence R13 was asked about or assessed for smoking. Progress note dated 6/17/24, indicated R13 expressed concerns and anger towards someone confiscating her cigarettes. Progress note dated 6/29/24, indicated R13 yelled at multiple staff to take her outside and smoke. When staff refused, R13 went outside by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to complete neurological assessments following falls for 2 of 2 residents (R7 and R25) who had unwitnessed falls. Facility also failed to ensure medications were administered per physician's orders for 1 of 2 residents (R30) reviewed for bowel management and failed to ensure vitals were obtained per physician's order for 1 of 1 resident (R30) reviewed for following physician orders. Findings include: R7 R7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R7 had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL)'s. R7's diagnoses included unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance, malnutrition, depression, varicose veins on right lower extremity with inflammation, peripheral vascular diseases, hypothyroidism, essential hypertension, osteoarthritis and systemic sclerosis. R7's progress note dated 6/5/24 at 1:51 p.m., identified an unwitnessed fall. R7 was heard screaming and staff found her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper treatment was provided to maintain hearing for 1 of 1 resident (R10) reviewed for hearing. Findings include: R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R10 had moderate cognitive impairment and required assistance with most ADL's. R10's care plan, indicated R10 was hard of hearing and has difficulty with normal conversations. Care plan indicated qualified nursing staff would monitor for changes with my [R10's] abilities with communication and would offer to arrange hearing evaluation as needed. R10's electronic health record (EHR) lacked evidence R10 was offered an audiology appointment. During observation and interview on 2/10/25 at 4:04 p.m., R10 stated he had difficulty with hearing and asked surveyor to speak louder as it was really hard to hear people talking. R10 did not have hearing aides in his ears. R10 stated he had three pairs of hearing aids; one pair won't stay in ears and his daughter took the other…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$41,955 in federal fines across 12 penalties.

• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
• $4,545 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
• $4,196 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
• $3,846 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
• $3,496 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
• $3,147 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
• $2,797 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
• $2,447 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
• $2,098 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
• $1,748 — penalty dated 2023-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $567K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN