New Brighton Care Center
805 Sixth Avenue Northwest, New Brighton, MN 55112 · For profit - Corporation · 57 certified beds · (651) 403-5241 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (28) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 32.4% | 18.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.5% | 4.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 1.9% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.2% | 2.6% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.9% | 4.1% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.0% | 4.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 35.6% | 20.5% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.9% | 12.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.2% | 5.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.2% | 24.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.4% | 17.1% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 61.3% | 82.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.0% | 23.5% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.7% | 14.8% | 12.0% | typical |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 74 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.9%CMS range 35.9–59.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 7.0–14.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 66.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 70.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 63.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 95.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 3.1–13.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.79 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 57 beds and averages 40.4 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.24 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.46 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.41 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2025-11-20 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to develop and document a facility assessment that includes plans for the recruitment and retention of staff. This had the potential to affect all 43 residents.The provided facility assessment dated [DATE], included sections on how to obtain staffing records, a general staffing plan, staff assignments, staff training and competencies, however did not include a section on staff recruitment and retention. During interview on 11/18/25 at 4:20 p.m., the administrator confirmed the facility assessment did not include information on the facilities plan to maximize recruitment and retention of direct care staff. Facility policy for a facility assessment requested and not provided.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to submit complete and accurate direct care staffing information based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data, for 1 of 1 quarters reviewed (quarter 3), to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) according to specifications established by CMS. This had the potential to affect all 43 residents residing at the facility.Review of the Payroll Based Journal Report (PBJ) [NAME] Report 1705D for April 1st to June 30th 2025, identified Excessively Low Weekend Staffing, No registered nurse (RN) Hours, and Failed to have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours a day. Report also triggered for One Star Staffing Rating. Dates identified for no RN coverage include 5/4/25, 5/31/25, 6/15/25, 6/22/2025, 6/28/25, and 6/29/25. Dates identified for not having 24 hour licensed nursing coverage included 5/3/25, 5/4/25, 5/18/25, 5/31/25, 6/1/25, 6/15/25, 6/28/25, 6/29/25. Review of schedules for April 1st to June 30th 2025, included RN coverage for all dates, 24 hour licensed nursing coverage for all dates, and staffing equal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0572 — isolatedGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide ongoing communication to residents about their rights for 2 of 2 residents (R12, R28) who attended the resident council meetings.R12's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], included R12 was cognitively intact and could understand others and make herself understood.R28's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], included R28 was cognitively intact and could understand others and make herself understood.Review of resident council meeting minutes for July 2025, August 2025, September 2025 and October 2025, failed to include information on resident rights.During a meeting about resident council on 11/19/25 at 1:30 p.m., R12 and R28 confirmed they did not discuss resident rights in the resident council meetings. R12 and R28 stated they do not remember going over the resident rights during admission. R12 and R28 were not aware resident rights were posted on a bulletin board in the building.During interview on 11/20/25 at 9:23 a.m., activities director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
During observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and distributed under sanitary conditions for 1 of 1 food trays dished up. During observation 11/19/25 starting at 11:10, cook (C - A was preparing the midday meal. C-A was wearing a pair of disposable gloves while setting up trays to be used for meal service.At 11:15 a.m., C-A left the kitchen by touching the door handle to open the door while keeping his gloves on. C-A returned less than 1 minute after holding a kitchen appliance with gloves still on his hands. C-A did not wash his hands or put new gloves on upon returning to the kitchen. C-A again opened the door with gloved hands and took a can of soup from a staff person to warm up for a resident. C-A did not wash hands or change his gloves.At 11:20, C-A placed oven mitts over gloves, took the temperature on breadsticks in the oven, and removed the oven mitts. C-A did not change his gloves or wash his hands.At 11: 23 a.m., C-A left the kitchen with gloves on by opening the door using the door knob and brushing his gloved right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper personal protective equipment (PPE) was used when providing cares for 1 of 1 resident (R37) reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Further, the facility failed to properly disinfect shared equipment between use for 1 of 1 glucometer (medical device used to check blood sugar levels) reviewed during medication administration.R37's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], included R37 received nutrition through a parenteral or tube feeding source while a resident. R37's care plan dated 11/21/25, included R37 was on EBP due to his gastronomy tube (G tube or a surgically placed tube that provides direct access to the stomach for feeding, hydration or medications) . During observation on 11/19/25 at 7:04 a.m., registered nurse (RN)-A and the director of nursing (DON) entered R37's room after preparing medications for tube feeding administration. R37's door had signage for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of potential abuse was reported timely to the State agency (SA), for 1 of 1 residents (R1) reviewed for an allegation of abuse. Findings include: R1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R1 was cognitively intact with mild depression. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, anxiety, depression, morbid obesity, chronic pain, and arthritis. R1 required partial to moderate physical assistance with upper body dressing and substantial/maximum assistance with lower body dressing and bed mobility. R1's weight was 379 pounds, and she was free of upper and/or lower extremity range of motion impairments. R1's comprehensive care plan identified on 1/27/20, R1 was a vulnerable adult due to her living in a skilled nursing facility. Interventions directed any suspicions of abuse/neglect, or maltreatment, to be investigated and reported as necessary to the proper agencies. Review of facility form titled A Grievance report,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of potential abuse for 1 of 1 residents (R1) who reported an allegation of potential abuse by staff. Findings include: R1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified R1 was cognitively intact with mild depression. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, anxiety, depression, morbid obesity, chronic pain, and arthritis. R1 required partial to moderate physical assistance with upper body dressing and substantial/maximum assistance with lower body dressing and bed mobility. R1's weight was 379 pounds, and she was free of upper and/or lower extremity range of motion impairments. R1's comprehensive care plan identified, on 1/27/20, R1 experienced an activity of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to weakness, obesity, and history of a CVA (stroke). Interventions directed setup assist of one staff for upper body dressing and two staff for lower body dressing, along with the use of bilateral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-17 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review and interviews the facility failed to ensure the required staffing information was posted daily. This had the potential to affect all 41 residents residing in the facility and their visitors who may wish to review the information. Findings include: During review of the staff posting documentation from April, May, June, and August 14th through October 14th the facility failed to provide evidence of the staff postings for the following dates: April: 6th, 7th, 13th, 14th, 20th, 21st, 27th, and 28th of 2024. May: 4th, 5th, 11th, 12th, 18th, 19th, 25th, and 26th of 2024. June: 1st, 2nd, 8th, 9th, 14th, 15th, 16th, 22nd, 23rd, 29th, 30th of 2024. August: 17th, 18th, 24th, 25th, and 31st of 2024. September: 1st, 7th, 8th, 14th, 15th, 21st, 27th, 28th, 29th of 2024. October: 5th, 6th, and 12th of 2024. On 10/16/24 at 4:11 p.m., the staffing coordinator (O)-C confirmed they had not been completing the staff posting on the weekends and was unaware it was required to be posted daily. On 10/17/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review the facility failed to submit any data for staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data, during 1 of 1 quarter reviewed (quarter 3), to the centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) according to specifications established by CMS. Findings Include: Review of the Payroll Based Journal Report (PBJ) [NAME] Report 1705D for quarter 3 2024 (April 1st through June 30th), identified no data had been submitted. As a result, the metric for excessively low weekend staffing, Registered Nurse (RN) hours and licensed nursing coverage was suppressed for the quarter. On 10/17/24 at 09:43 a.m., the human resources specialist (O)-B stated they were responsible for gathering and submitting the data for each quarter to CMS. O-B confirmed they had forgotten the last step and did not submit it to CMS for quarter 3. O-B stated the importance of completing and submitting this information because it could interfere with the facility's overall star rating, admissions related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-17 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the acting infection preventionist (IP) had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. This had the potential to affect all 41 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 10/17/24 at 9:59 a.m., the interim director of nursing (DON) stated the DON and assistant director of nursing (ADON) shared IP duties. The DON stated she had not completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. On 10/17/24 at 10:29 a.m., the administrator stated the DON and the ADON had not completed specialized training in infection prevention and control. A policy related to infection preventionist specialized training was requested, but not provided.
Show the remaining 18 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure insulin flexpens and eye drops were appropriately labeled with an opened on date to prevent expired medications from being administered in 3 of 3 medication carts. In addition, the facility failed to ensure controlled substances were stored in a manner to reduce the risk of theft and/or diversion in 1 of 3 medication carts, and 1 of 1 medication refrigerators. This had the potential to effect all residents. Findings include: On 10/15/24 at 7:36 a.m., the medication cart located on the [NAME] wing was reviewed. Licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A stated the top drawer contained an opened multidose bottle of Dorzolamide-timolol 2-0.5% eye drops. However, it had not been labeled with the date the bottle had been opened. On 10/16/24 at 4:26 p.m., the medication cart located on the East wing was reviewed. LPN-C stated the cart contained an opened Ozempic 4 mg/3 mL (insulin) flexpen. The flexpen and/or box had not been labeled with the date the insulin had been opened. On 10/16/24 at 4:42 p.m., the medication cart located on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice-Centers for Medicare and Medicaid-10055 (SNFABN-CMS-10055) was provided to 2 of 3 residents (R194 and R195) reviewed for beneficiary notices. Findings include: R194's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R194 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE]. R194's Notice of Medicare non-coverage form-CMS-10123 (NOMNC-CMS-10123), undated, indicated R194's services would end on [DATE]. However, R194 remained in the facility until [DATE]. R194's undated SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form, indicated the facility/provider initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A when benefit days were not exhausted. R194's medical record lacked evidence the SNFABN-CMS-10055 was provided to R194 or their representative as required. R195's death in facility tracking record MDS dated [DATE], indicated R195 was admitted on [DATE] under the Medicare A benefit which may…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a written notification of transfer was provided for 1 of 3 residents (R7) upon transfer to the hospital. In addition, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman for Long Term Care (LTC) of resident transfers to the hospital for 1 of 3 residents (R7), reviewed for hospitalization. This had the potential to affect all residents transferred to hospital. Findings include: R7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R7 was cognitively intact. Diagnoses included diabetes, cerebral infarction (stroke), bipolar disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). R7's clinical record indicated R7 was hospitalized from [DATE] through 9/6/24. R7's discharge MDS dated [DATE], indicated R7 had an unplanned discharge to a short-term general hospital and return was anticipated. R7's record lacked progress notes which indicated the circumstances of the transfer to the hospital on 9/4/24. R7's entry tracking MDS dated [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of a bed hold at the time of transfer for hospitalization for 1 of 3 residents (R7) reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: R7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R7 was cognitively intact. Diagnoses included diabetes, cerebral infarction (stroke), bipolar disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). R7's clinical record indicated R7 was hospitalized from [DATE] through 9/6/24. R7's discharge MDS dated [DATE], indicated R7 had an unplanned discharge to a short-term general hospital and return was anticipated. R7's record lacked a progress note indicating the reason for the transfer to the hospital on 9/4/24. R7's entry tracking MDS dated [DATE], indicated R7 returned from short-term general hospital on 9/6/24. However, R7's recorded lacked evidence a bed hold notice was provided to the resident and/or responsible party at the time of transfer for hospitalization. R7's clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 1 of 1 residents (R7) reviewed for skin conditions. Findings include: R7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R7 was cognitively intact. Diagnoses included diabetes, cerebral infarction (stroke), bipolar disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). R7's progress note dated 10/5/24 at 10:23 p.m., indicated R7 called 911 at 7:50 p.m. R7 wanted to go to the hospital because the cream (ammonium lactate) that was applied to her legs made them feel numb. R7's progress note dated 10/6/24 at 2:00 p.m., indicated R7 returned from the hospital at 1:30 p.m., with no change in condition noted, no new orders, and still complained of pain in her legs. During observation on 10/13/24 at 2:52 p.m., R7's lower extremeties were swollen and red with multiple blisters covering both legs from under the knees to the ankles. On 10/13/24 at 3:07 p.m., R7 stated approximately a week prior, she had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain infection control measures when performing wound care for 1 of 1 residents (R25) reviewed for wound care. Findings include: R25's annual minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R25's cognition as intact and included diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (a blood disorder characterized by impaired ability of the body to maintain proper levels of sugar in the blood), heart failure and hypertension. Further, R25 had a stage 4 full thickness pressure ulcer (an injury to the skin and tissue due to pressure on the skin for a long time) with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle. R25's current care plan identified R25 had skin alteration related to stage 4 sacral ulcer. Nursing staff were to keep skin clean and dry, provide wound care per orders, observe for changes and update provider as needed. Furthermore, R25 was to receive a skin assessment per protocol and nursing staff to observe skin with personal cares. R25's nurse practitioner (NP)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 residents (R2, R3) reviewed for immunizations were offered and/or provided the pneumococcal vaccine series as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to help reduce the risk of associated infection(s). Findings include: A CDC Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults feature dated 3/15/2023, identified various tables when each (or all) of the pneumococcal vaccinations should be obtained. This identified when an adult over [AGE] years old, or an adult 19-[AGE] years old with specified immunocompromising conditions, had received the complete series (i.e., PPSV23 and PCV13) then the patient and provider (shared clinical decision-making) may choose to administer Pneumococcal 20-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20). R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 was [AGE] years old and diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic respiratory failure. R2's immunization report, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper sanitization of dishware used for meal preparation and resident service when 1 of 1 high-temperature commercial dishwashers was identified as not reaching adequate wash and rinse temperatures. In addition, the facility failed to store dishware in a manner preventing contamination. Further, the facility failed to ensure the ice dispensing machine was clean and free of excess mineral build up or cleaned on a regular schedule. This had potential to affect all 36 residents within the nursing home, staff, and visitors who consumed food from the main production kitchen and/or ice from the dining room ice machine. Dishwashing Machine During observation and interview on 11/20/23 at 12:38 p.m., the label on the side of the [NAME] AM-14 dishwasher indicated dish sanitization required a wash temperature of 150°F for a minimum of 40 seconds and rinse temperature of 180°F for a minimum of nine seconds. Dietary aide (DA)-A stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure fans in the dish sanitization and storage area were maintained in a clean and sanitary manner to prevent dishware contamination. This had potential to affect all 36 residents within the nursing home, staff, and visitors who consumed food from the main production kitchen. Findings include: During observation of the dish washing room on 11/20/23 at 11:57 a.m., a large fan was attached to the wall near the ceiling on the dirty side where the soiled dishes came in and another smaller fan was attached to the wall on the clean side where the clean dishes were stored and put away. Both fans were turned on, oscillating, and moving air about the room, and both were covered in thick, brown dusty substance. The fan on the clean side was located approximately three feet from a shelf containing clean cups just above the counter where clean dishes were placed when removed from the dishwasher. During observation on 11/20/23, at 12:50 p.m. the smaller fan was blowing on two trays containing 16 clean cups and a tray…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed for 3 of 3 residents (R23, R25, R24) observed during wound cares. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed for 1 of 1 residents (R23) reviewed for toileting. Findings include: R23 R23's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R23 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of chronic venous insufficiency (poor blood flow) and bilateral lower extremity vascular wounds. Furthermore, R23's MDS indicated R23 required assist of one for toileting. An observation on 11/21/23 at 7:10 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A entered R23's room without performing hand hygiene. R23 requested to use the bed pan. Without hand hygiene, LPN-A donned gloves and obtained R23's bedpan from the bathroom. LPN-A assisted R23 to turn in bed and placed the bedpan. LPN-A then removed gloves and without performing hand hygiene left R23's room and walked down hall to obtain washcloths. At…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 5 residents (R1, R9, R18, R21, R27) were provided education regarding risks and benefits, offered, and/or received the pneumococcal vaccine in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations. R1's Medical Diagnosis list dated 11/22/23, included lung disease, heart failure, and opioid dependence. The CDC's PneumoRecs VaxAdvisor indicated for patients aged 19-64 who have not received PCV15 or PCV20, with a risk factor of heart and lung disease and had a PCV13, Give one dose of PCV20 at least 1 year after PCV13. Or Give one dose of PPSV23 at least 1 year after PCV13. R1's Order Summary Report dated 11/22/23, included May receive Pneumovax if not already received unless contraindicated starting 11/2/23. R1's Immunization Report dated 11/22/23, indicated R1 refused the PPSV23 vaccine. R1's medical record lacked evidence of provision of education regarding risks and benefits. R9's Medical Diagnosis list dated 11/22/23, included autistic disorder and high blood pressure. The CDC's PneumoRecs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-22 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to assess residents for the ability to self administer medications for 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed for medications at bedside. Findings include: R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 had intact cognition and diagnoses of congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and type II diabetes. R2 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, locomotion off the unit, and toileting, limited assistance with transfers and dressing, and supervision with locomotion on the unit. R2's physician's orders included orders for the following medications: 1. Albuterol Sulfate Aerosol Solution, inhale 2 puffs orally four times a day for shortness of breath. 2. Nystatin external powder 100000 unit/gram, apply to vulva topically two times a day for yeast active 9/22/2023 3. Nystatin Powder , apply to groin topically two times a day for yeast until resolved active 5/25/2021 4. Biofreeze external gel 4 %, apply to neck and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure effective collaboration between the facility and a contracted hospice organization which affected 1 of 1 resident (R13) reviewed for hospice services, and failed to ensure vascular wounds were assessed for 1 of 2 residents (R23) reviewed for wounds. Findings include: Hospice R13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. Further, the MDS indicated in section O R13 received hospice services in the past 7 days. Review of R13's significant change MDS date 6/9/23, indicated in section O R13 did not receive hospice services in the past 14 days. R13's Medical Diagnosis form indicated the following diagnoses: severe sepsis with septic shock (a life threatening complication of an infection), urinary tract infection, atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure a resident (R2) was assessed to safely use and store a curling iron for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accidents. Findings include: R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 had intact cognition and diagnoses of congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and weakness. It further indicated R2 was independent with personal hygiene after staff set up the supplies. R2's care plan dated 11/15/23, indicated R2 had a self care performance deficit related to weakness with an intervention of assistance of one staff with personal hygiene. During observation on 11/20/23 at 12:39 p.m., R2 was laying in bed. Next to the bed (on the right side) there was an extension cord with four outlets and one of the outlets had a curling iron plugged into it and the curling iron was laying inside the second drawer of the nightstand. During observation and interview on 11/21/23 at 8:30 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure coordination of dialysis care for 1 of 1 resident (R25) who required dialysis (treatment to filter blood when kidneys are no longer able). Findings include: R25's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R25 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of diabetes and kidney failure. Furthermore, R25's MDS indicated R25 required dialysis treatment. R25's provider order dated 9/30/23, directed the morning nurse to ensure dialysis communication form goes with R25 for dialysis treatments every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. R25's care plan dated 10/20/23, indicated R25 refused scheduled dialysis treatments and a goal of no missed appointments through the next review period. R25's dialysis communication sheets and dialysis run sheets were requested however not received. When interviewed on 11/20/23 at 5:08 p.m., R25 stated he had never been sent with any paperwork from the facility when going to dialysis appointments. When interviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to re-evaluate the continued use of an as needed (PRN) antianxiety medication every 14 days as required for 1 of 1 residents (R13) reviewed for PRN antianxiety medication. Findings include: R13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R13 had severely impaired cognition. R13 was assessed to have depression. R13 had behaviors of refusing cares 1 - 3 times a week. R13 had diagnoses of depression, acute kidney failure, and atrial fibrillation. R13 received an antianxiety on a routine and PRN basis. R13's Medication Administration Records (MAR) for October 2023, and November 2023, identified R13 had an order for Lorazepam (an antianxiety)1 milligrams (mg) by mouth every four hours as needed for anxiety/restlessness. The order originated on 10/16/23, and there was no end date indicated on the MAR. R13 received the PRN medication 10 times in October and 15 times in November. R13's completed pharmacy Consultation Report with recommendation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's environment remained free from accidents as possible to prevent falls for 4 of 4 residents (R3, R5, R6, and R7) reviewed for falls when there was a lack of evaluation of factors to prevent future falls. Findings include: R3's 5-day MDS dated [DATE], noted R3 had intact cognition, required extensive assistance of one for most activities of daily living (ADL's) and had diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure, COVID-19, and type II diabetes mellitus. R3's fall risk evaluation dated 8/7/23, noted R3 was a moderate risk for falls. R3's care plan initiated on 8/7/23, noted R3 was at risk for falls due to chronic atrial fibrillation, history of falls, loss of vision. Interventions noted R3 should have his call light within reach and answered timely and to remind him to ask for assistance with transfer and ambulation. A progress note dated 8/14/23, noted R3 had a fall at 11:10 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-23 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an agency nurse was oriented to the facility medication administration system for 5 of 5 resident (R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5) reviewed for medications when a nurse did not perform blood glucose testing or administer insulin. Findings include: R1's 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], noted she was cognitively intact, required limited assistance of one person for most activities of daily living (ADL's). Her diagnoses included fracture of the left humerus, obesity, lymphedema, and type II diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease. R1's physician order dated 7/31/23, to check blood sugar levels before meals and at bedtime. R1's electronic medical record (EMR) contained a diabetic (DIAB) administration report for August of 2023, noted blank spaces for scheduled blood sugar checks on 8/10/23, for 7:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. R1's blood glucose logs for August of 2023, noted her blood glucose was checked at 4:43 p.m. and was 152 and checked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHIES, MICHAEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 33% | since 01/01/2018 |
| CHIES, STEVEN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | 33% | since 01/01/2018 |
| CHIES, TIMOTHY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 33% | since 01/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245421. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.