Fairway View Neighborhoods

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 51 beds and averages 48.0 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.24 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.10 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.08 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-12-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (R1) was free from neglect when R1 had a fall, intentionally not reported by staff, which delayed necessary medical care for two hours. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R1 when, as a result of the fall, she was treated at the emergency department (ED) where she was diagnosed with a laceration to her forehead, an abrasion, bruising, concussion and a fracture of the sternum. The IJ began on 12/15/25 at 7 p.m., when nurse aide (NA)-A transferred R1 alone (care plan directs assist of two) and R1 fell off the edge of the bed which resulted in bleeding laceration on her forehead and NA-A intentionally did not report the fall or seek appropriate medical care until two hours later. The administrator, director of nursing (DON), and primary care provider medical doctor (MD) were notified of the IJ on 12/23/25 at 4:30 p.m. The facility implemented corrective action by 12/18/25, prior to the start of the survey,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2025-05-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure fire suppression pipes located directly above the deep fat fryer, and stove top grill surface were free from accumulation of dirt and grease. This buildup had the potential to contaminate food being prepared and served. In addition, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 meat slicer was appropriately cleaned and sanitized following use. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all 51 residents who received food prepared in the facility kitchen. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 5/12/25 at 12:33 p.m., with the certified dietary manager (CDM) identified the vent hood located above the stove top grill and deep fat fryer, contained metal pipes identified as the fire suppression system, which were coated with a black fuzzy substance the CDM identified as dirt and grease buildup. Both the pipes and light fixtures in the hood had multiple areas identified as rust. The CDM stated she had only been in her position for two weeks and had not noticed the buildup on the ends of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an insulin SoloStar Insulin pen was appropriately primed prior to insulin administration for 1 of 2 residents (R30) who received 25 units of Lantus insulin daily. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 5/12/25 at 5:50 p.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A prepared to administer R30's ordered dose of Lantus insulin. The current physician orders for Lantus Solostar insulin identified he was to receive 25 units subcutaneously (subcutaneous injections are used to administer medications between skin and muscle) once per day, with a special note which identified the insulin was to be administered between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. daily per resident request. LPN-A checked the pen against the Medication Administration Record (MAR), performed hand hygiene, removed the pen cap, wiped the end of the pen with an alcohol pad, attached the needle, dialed the pen to one unit and depressed the plunger, no insulin was observed exiting the needle. LPN-A then dialed the pen to 25 units, retrieved a new…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  During an observation and interview on 5/12/25 at 12:03 p.m., TMA-B cleansed hands and applied gloves prior to checking resident blood sugars. TMA-B placed a test strip into the common use glucometer, cleansed R1's middle right finger with an alcohol wipe, used a lancet to prick her finger and dropped the sample of blood onto the test strip. At 12:08 p.m., TMA-B sanitized the common use glucometer with a single use Sani wipe by wiping the front and back briefly and placed the glucometer on her cart. When interviewed, TMA-B stated she believed the glucometer was sanitized after wiping it as she had. TMA-B removed gloves and sanitized her hands. TMA-B entered the results into R1's electronic medical record and moved her cart down the hallway to the hallway located to the right of the dining room. At 12:12 p.m., TMA-B was bringing R9 to a private area to check her blood sugar when surveyor stopped her and asked her to review the manufacturer's guidelines for the Sani wipe she used for sanitizing the glucometer. TMA-B reviewed the instructions and did confirm the instructions identified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide assistance with routine grooming cares which included facial hair removal for 1 of 1 residents (R14) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) who required assistance with grooming and personal hygiene. Findings include: R14's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R14 had moderate cognitive impairment and diagnoses which included: Alzheimer's disease, arthritis and hypertension. Indicated R14 required partial/moderate assistance for personal hygiene and dressing. R14 required maximum assistance with bathing. Identified R14 had physical and verbal behavior symptoms one to three days and did not exhibit rejection of cares. R14's care plan revised 6/18/24, identified R14 required assistance with ADLs related to Alzheimer's disease. R14's care plan approaches identified R14 required extensive assistance with bathing and dressing. In addition, R14 required cueing, set up and extensive assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document interview, the facility failed to conduct an accurate and timely smoking assessment for 1 of 1 residents (R16) who currently smoked. Findings include: R16's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R16 was cognitively intact and was independent with mobility, transfers, toileting, and required limited assistance with dressing. Identified R16 had hypertension (high blood pressure), arthritis and a wound infection. R16's care plan updated 7/8/24, indicated R16 was a current smoker and was at risk for injury related to smoking. Identified R16 demonstrated safety with smoking and disposed cigarette butts in the appropriate designated location. R16's initial smoking assessment dated [DATE], was completed by therapy staff and indicated R16 was a safe smoker, was able to get to/from smoking location and demonstrated safe use/disposal of cigarette butts. During an observation and interview on 7/8/24 at 2:53 p.m., R16 indicated it was hard to go from the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene during a medication pass for 3 of 7 (residents R44, R15, R48 ) observed for medication administration and during personal cares for 1 of 4 residents (R45) observed for captivities of daily living (ADL's). In addition, the facility failed to implement appropriate donning/doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE) practices and to ensure PPE was readily available for use to prevent the spread of infection for 1 of 5 residents (R16) observed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) (an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities). Findings include: HAND HYGIENE/MEDICATION PASS R44's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R44 had intact cognition and diagnosis which included: hypertension (elevated blood pressure) Diabetes and glaucoma. Identified R44…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• No harm found · C2026-07-22 · tag F0732 — widespread
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to include the resident censes on the facility nurse staff posting. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 49 who resided in the facility and any visitors who may have wished to view the information. During an observation on 7/20/26 at 3:46 p.m., nurse staff posting dated 7/20/26, was observed on a bulletin board by the director of nursing (DON) office. The staff posting included the total number of nursing staff hours, broken down into sections of day shift, evening shift, and overnight shift, with spaces in each section for registered nurse (RN), licensed practical nurse (LPN), trained medication aide (TMA), and certified nursing assistant (NA). The posting lacked information on the resident census. During an interview on 7/20/26 at 4:00 p.m., DON indicated that the process was for the night shift to post the nurse staff posting. DON verified that the census area was blank and should have been included in the posting. DON indicated that it is important to list the censes and staffing in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in MN