No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Mission Nursing Home

3401 East Medicine Lake Boulevard, Plymouth, MN 55441 · Non profit - Corporation · 70 certified beds · (763) 231-5924 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$14,015 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2026
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $14,015 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-11)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2800 Campus Dr Ste 20 · (763) 398-6050 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4445 Nathan Ln N · (763) 557-0377 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4445 Nathan Ln N · (763) 559-9419 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3110 Medicine Lake Blvd E · (763) 545-5631

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.8%18.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.5%4.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder4.4%1.9%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.9%2.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.8%4.1%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.5%4.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.3%20.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.7%12.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.0%5.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.3%24.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.4%17.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.6%1.9%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.7%82.7%79.4%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.641.611.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.801.901.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.32
RN hours/ resident / day
0.11
LPN hours/ resident / day
0.66
Aide hours/ resident / day
1.09
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
24.0%
Total nursing turnover
11.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 61.8 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 1.09 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 0.66 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 1.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 1.10 on weekdays — 3% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-22)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-12)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2026-02-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to protect 1 of 1 resident (R1) from staff to resident abuse when R1 was physically and verbally abused by nursing aid (NA)-A which resulted in psychosocial harm to R1 who was crying and visibly upset during the abuse incident. The facility implemented corrective action, and the deficient practice was corrected on 2/19/26, prior to the survey and was issued at past non-compliance. Findings include: R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses of stroke and cancer with prognosis less than six months to live. The MDS indicated severe cognitive impairment, no mood or behaviors, no rejection of care and required staff dependance with activities of daily living, occasionally incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel. R1's Care Plan (CP) dated 2/19/25, indicated diagnoses of Hemiplegia (total paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness) affecting one side of the body caused by stroke, aphasia (impaired speech and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2025-04-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure pain medications were re-ordered and available for administration per physician orders for 1 of 3 residents (R2), who had chronic pain and utilized pain medication. This resulted in actual harm when R2 was not administered the physicians ordered pain medication before a pre-scheduled surgery prior to leaving the facility for surgery, and arrived at the surgery center tearful and in severe pain. The facility implemented immediate corrective action prior to the survey and was therefore issued at past non-compliance. Findings include: R2's admission Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness or paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (or stroke, a condition where a part of the brain is damaged or dies due to a lack of blood supply) affecting left non-dominant side, chronic pain syndrome, depression and anxiety disorder. R2's cognition was intact.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and document review the facility failed to ensure the State Ombudsman for Long Term Care (LTC) was notified of a transfer to the hospital for 1 of 3 residents (R6) when transferred to the hospital for medical treatment. Findings include: R6's Continuity of Care document undated, indicated diagnosis of schizophrenia, diabetes, and epilepsy. A progress note dated 9/4/25 at 9:16 p.m., indicated R6 went to the hospital for seizure activity. The facility notified the provider and family of the hospitalization. R6's medical record lacked evidence the State Ombudsman for LTC was notified of the transfer. The facility Bed Hold Policy and Notification of Transfer dated 9/4/25, indicated R6 had been sent to the hospital. However, there was no verification that the LTC Ombudsman was notified of the transfer. An interview on 5/21/26 at 11:21 a.m. the assistant director of nursing (ADON) stated they could not verify if the LTC Ombudsman had been notified unless the nurses wrote they sent it to the LTC Ombudsman the progress notes. ADON stated that sometimes the nurses will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to monitor and implement interventions per physician orders for 1 of 1 resident (R16) reviewed for heart failure. Findings include: R16's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R16 diagnoses included congestive heart failure (CHF), hypertension, and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (episodes of irregular heart rhythm). R16's Physician Order Report, signed by provider 4/15/26, indicated the following orders:Lasix (furosemide) 20 milligrams (mg) daily as needed (PRN) if weight up over 3 pounds (lbs) in one day or 5 lbs/weekCheck weight daily and update provider if weight is up 5 lbs in one week or 3 lbs in one day R16's weight summary, printed 5/22/26, indicated R16's weight was 208.2 lbs on 4/17/26, and 212.2 lbs on 4/18/26, which indicated a weight gain of 4 lbs in one day. R16's weight continued to be elevated with weights documented as 211.6 lbs on 4/19/26, and 211.6 lbs on 4/20/26. However, R16's record lacked evidence that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was used for 2 of 2 residents (R11 and R44) who required enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). In addition, the facility failed to ensure nationally accepted standards of practice for bodily fluid removal from catheter drainage bag were followed for 2 of 2 residents (R11 and R44). Findings include: R11's admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated R11 diagnosis included neurogenic bladder and cancer. R11 was total assist with toilet hygiene. R11 had an indwelling urinary catheter. An observation on 5/19/26 at 4:16 p.m., R11's room had a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) sign that indicated EBP was to be worn when staff were doing high contact resident care activities: dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, changing linens, providing hygiene, changing brief or assisting with toileting, device care or use: central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident receiving hospice services had a comprehensive written plan of care included both the most recent hospice plan of care and a description of the services furnished by the facility to help the resident attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well being for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for hospice services. Findings include:R1's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], identified R1's primary diagnoses included repeated falls, Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia and dementia with hospice care as discharge disposition.R1's hospice initial coordination note dated 2/10/26 indicated goals related to pain management as well as the initial visit frequency (once a week for nursing staff and once a month for social workers) but none of these goals or interventions were integrated into the facility's care plan. The note further indicated hospice will deliver to the facility the initial plan of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to perform comprehensive skin assessments (at least weekly) as ordered, which included assessment for new wounds and documenting wound measurements and other wound characteristics for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for pressure injury. Findings include: R1R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, pressure ulcers (PU) upon admission, and risk to develop PU. The MDS data indicated R1 admitted [DATE], discharged [DATE], re-admitted [DATE], and discharged on 1/14/26. R1's diagnoses included cancer, deep vein thrombosis (a blood clot in a deep vein), bowel and bladder incontinence, and malnutrition. R1 was on chemotherapy upon admission. R1 had mobility limitations that required a wheelchair for mobility. R1's provider orders dated 12/5/25 indicated perform skin check, head to toe, to be completed weekly on Fridays. R1 had ongoing pressure wound care orders for both the right and left ischial tuberosities (large…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0729 — pattern
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a system of registry verification approved by the State before allowing nursing assistant to do nursing or nursing-related services in the facility for 4 of 7 nursing assistants (NA-A, NA-B, NA-C, NA-D) reviewed for the required certificate status.Findings include:NA-A's registered certificate dated 9/16/2006, indicated NA-A had an inactive registry status effective 8/24/2025, and the personal file did not contain any evidence of renewal.During an interview on 1/7/2026 at 10:42 a.m., NA-A stated he had been working for the facility since 2006 as a nursing assistant and was trained three years ago to administer medications under a nurse's supervision as a trained medication aide (TMA). However, NA-A's personal file lacked evidence of verifying active NA status or TMA certification. NA-A stated he provided nursing related care to residents this morning.NA-B's registered certificate dated 11/21/1995, indicated NA-B had an inactive registry status effective 4/02/23 and the personal file lacked any evidence of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner for 2 of 3 residents (R3, R4) reviewed for dignity. Findings include: Resident council meeting minutes dated January 2025 identified call light times were long, March 2025 meeting notes identified call light times were still long. R3's admission MDS dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and no behaviors. He required substantial/maximal assistant with personal hygiene and upper body dressing, dependent upon staff to provide toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, and chair/bed to chair transfers. He had an indwelling urinary catheter and frequently incontinent of bowel. Medical diagnoses included neurogenic bladder (bladder dysfunction caused by neurologic damage due to brain, spinal cord, or nerve problems), urinary tract infection (UTI), paraplegia (paralysis that affects the lower half of the body on both sides), and seizure disorder. R3's care plan dated 4/22/25, identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 resident (R2) was free of significant medication errors when physician's orders for Darbepoetin (causes the bone marrow to produce red blood cells and used to treat anemia in people with chronic kidney failure) was not administered as prescribed, resulting in seven missed doses of Darbepoetin.Findings include: R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified moderately impaired cognition and no behaviors. R2's quarterly MDS date 5/30/25, identified medical diagnoses of anemia (low red blood cell count), coronary disease (CAD), high blood pressure (HTN), renal failure, neurogenic bladder, diabetes mellitus (DM), anxiety, and depression. Currently taking a diuretic (reduces fluid buildup in body) and daily insulin. R2's emergency department (ED) record dated 8/23/24, identified . labs notable for hemoglobin of 6.8 which is baseline between 8 and 9. Creatinine is 3.2 with prior values between 2.5 and 3.3. Emails exchanged with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene was performed during personal cares for 1 of 1 resident (R4) reviewed for infection prevention and control.Findings include: R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition, impairment of functional range of motion (ROM) on one side and required substantial/maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, upper body dressing, personal hygiene, roll left and right, dependent for lower body dressing, all transfers, and used a manual wheelchair for mobility. He was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Medical diagnoses include stroke, hemiplegia/hemiparalysis (paralysis or severe weakness on one side of the body), and depression. R4's care plan dated 9/26/25, identified self-care deficit with activities of daily living (ADL) and directed staff to provide extensive assistance of one to two staff with all ADL, bed mobility toileting, dressing, grooming, and wheelchair mobility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach and accessible for 1 of 3 residents (R2) who was dependent on staff for care. Findings include: R2's admission Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness or paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (or stroke, a condition where a part of the brain is damaged or dies due to a lack of blood supply) affecting left non-dominant side, chronic pain syndrome, depression and anxiety disorder. R2's cognition was intact and R2 required substantial assistance by staff for toileting, dressing, and bed mobility. On 4/9/25 at 12:16 p.m., R2 was observed in his room sitting in his standard manual wheelchair. R2's call light was wrapped around the grab bar of his bed on the left side along the window and wall side of his room. R2 was in front of the television and call light was not within reach. R2 stated he would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure adaptive equipment was provided for 1 of 2 residents (R3) reviewed for safety while smoking. Findings include: R3's significant change Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R3 had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizophrenia, and R3 was cognitively intact. R3's Smoking assessment dated [DATE], indicated R3 used 6-10 cigarettes a day and did not have a preference on time of day he liked to smoke. R3 was assessed to need a smoking apron for adaptive equipment while smoking. Further, interdisciplinary team reviewed and determined R3 had a modified smoking plan, wears an apron for safety and had not been observed falling asleep with current assessment. Review of facility document titled Mission Nursing Home Resident Leveling and Smoke Program, undated, identified R3 as a smoker, on a modified smoking program, and required a smoking apron. On 4/8/25 at approximately 10:00 a.m., R3 was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-12 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a plan that defined measurable goals and create a system to collect feedback from resident and resident representatives. This had the potential to affect all 56 residents in the facility. Findings Include: During entrance interview on 3/10/25 at 12:54 p.m., a request for a copy of the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan was made to the director of nursing (DON). On 3/13/25 at 1:37 p.m., another request was made for a copy of the QAPI plan. On 3/13/25 at 2:25 p.m., the facility's QAPI program policy was provided. On 3/12/25 at 2:44 p.m., the director of nursing (DON) provided meeting minutes for the last four quarters, but failed to provide an overall plan. QAPI meeting minutes included attendees, agenda, and data related to focuses such as infections, wounds, medication errors, admission/discharges, and weight changes. The document lacked evidence of target goals for sustainability. The document failed to provided evidence that resident and resident representative feedback was obtained to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a thorough smoking assessment was completed on residents who wished to smoke for 5 of 5 residents (R54, R16, R34, R52 and R19) reviewed for smoking. Findings include: An undated facility document titled Mission Nursing Home Resident leveling and Smoking program identified R54, R16, R34, R52 and R19 as current smokers. R54's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R54 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had the following diagnoses: Stroke, Non-traumatic brain dysfunction, traumatic brain dysfunction, progressive neurological conditions, and traumatic spinal cord dysfunction. The MDS further indicated R54 was cognitively intact and identified R54 as a current tobacco user. R54's face sheet printed 3/12/25, identified R54 as a current daily smoker. R54's care plan with a last review/revision date of 3/10/25, indicated R54 was an independent smoker, had a goal of remaining safe while smoking and would be reassessed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a level II pre-admission screen and resident review (PASSAR) was completed prior to admission for 1 of 1 residents (R54) reviewed who required a level II PASSAR screening for mental illness. Findings include: R54 quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R54 was cognitively intact, and had experienced feeling down, hopeless or depressed, had trouble falling asleep or staying asleep, felt tired or had little energy, and had difficulty concentrating on things at least half or more days in the two weeks prior to the assessment. R54's face sheet printed 3/12/25, indicated an admission date of 11/26/25, identified R54 as a veteran and listed diagnoses to include major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and opioid dependency. R54's Minnesota Senior linkage Line preadmission screening results dated 11/25/24, indicated R54 met the requirements for a mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the infection control program included symptom tracking and ongoing analysis of trending of resident infections to prevent the spread of infections. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 58 residents in the facility. Findings include: The facility's infection control logs were reviewed for March and April 2024. The logs identified tracking records of residents with infections, cultures, and treatments. However, the facility lacked documentation of analysis and/or trending of patterns identified. The facility utilized a form titled infection control log which had sections for each of the following items: identifying location, date, the patient, admission date, room number, unit, type, site and date of onset of infection, cultures, organisms, antibiotic resistance. Additionally, whether an antibiotic was started, infection definition (type of), classification section to select community or healthcare acquired infections, date resolved and if the resident was isolated or not. Furthermore, the form…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-31 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review the facility failed to implement a process for antibiotic stewardship to determine appropriate indications, dosage, duration, symptoms, analysis of trends and efficacy of antibiotic use. This had the potential to affect any of the 58 residents in the facility. Findings include: The facility's infection control logs were reviewed for March and April of 2024. The logs identified tracking records of residents with infections, cultures, and antibiotic treatments. However, the facility lacked documentation of analysis, trending of patterns identified or efficacy of antibiotics used. The facility utilized a form titled infection control log which had sections for each of the following items: identifying location, date, the patient, admission date, room number, unit, type, site and date of onset of infection, cultures, organisms, antibiotic resistance. Additionally, whether an antibiotic was started, infection definition (type of), classification section to select community or healthcare acquired infections, date resolved and if the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for 1 of 1 resident (R19) reviewed for dignity. Findings include: R19's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated a brief interview for mental status (BIMS-cognitive test) score of 15/15 indicating cognitively intact, self-care deficit requiring substantial/maximal assistance for toileting hygiene, upper and lower dressing, positioning and transfers. R19's diagnoses included but were not limited to hemiplegia (weakness or paralysis of one side of the body), bipolar disease (a mental health condition that causes mood swings), and hypertension (high blood pressure). R19's care plan dated 2/14/24 indicated R19's ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL's) had deteriorated related to a diagnosis of hemiplegia and required extensive staff assistance of one to two staff for toileting, dressing, bathing, grooming and bed mobility. Total dependence with Hoyer lift (a device designed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident received unopened mail for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for their right to receive communication with privacy. Findings include: R55's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) was 14 and R55 was cognitively intact. R55's MDS listed the following diagnoses: congestive heart failure (heart does not pump blood efficiently), Diabetes Mellitus, depression, and post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). On 5/30/24 at 10:29 a.m., resident council met and R15 stated sometimes social services (SS)-A went through their mail for contraband. On 5/30/24 at 11:03 a.m., SS-A stated they were responsible for sorting and delivering the mail on the weekdays. SS-A stated they delivered the mail unopened but had performed searches of the mail for suspected illicit drugs or alcohol, with the consent of the resident. On 5/30/24 at 4:04 p.m., the administrator stated they were unaware SS-A had been going…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives were accurately documented in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) under physician orders for 1 of 1 residents (R109) reviewed for accurate code status. Findings include: R109's hospital discharge orders dated [DATE], identified the need for postoperative care and an order for full code (the initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the absence of a pulse). R109's facility signed physician order report dated [DATE], identified an order dated [DATE] for full code. R109's EMR banner identified a code status of do not resuscitate (DNR). R109's facility face sheet dated [DATE] identified an admission date of [DATE], diagnoses of cholecystectomy (a procedure to remove the gallbladder) aftercare, abscesses (confined pockets of pus caused by infection) of the liver and peritoneum (the tissue that lines the abdominal wall and pelvic cavity). The face sheet identified R109's code status as DNR. R109's facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were kept clean and in good condition for 1 of 2 residents (R36) reviewed for environment. Findings include: R36's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of 9, moderately cognitively impaired, and diagnoses included: heart failure (heart not pumping blood efficiently), hypertension (HTN), and hemiparesis (inability to move part of the body). On 5/28/24 at 12:51 p.m., R36's room had large amount of what resembled brown ground meat across the floor starting from approximately 2 feet to the left of the bed across the main walkway of the room and under the table across from the resident's bed about 2 feet into the room's threshold, spanning approximately 3 feet across the floor. There were straw wrappers and other paper debris on the floor. The resident was in bed resting. On 5/28/24 at 4:52 p.m., the resident's family member (O)-G stated they had recently come to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure a written notification of transfer was sent to the office of the Ombudsman for long term care for 1 of 2 residents (R44) reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: R44's undated face sheet listed the following diagnoses: heart failure, arthritis, pain, cellulitis (infection of the cell), pleural effusions (collection of fluid, air, pus, or blood between the lining of the lung and the lung itself, causes difficulty breathing), atrial fibrillation (top chambers of the heart beat erratically), lymphedema (collection of fluid in the extremities), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- lung disease that makes it difficult to breath), chronic kidney disease-stage 4 (CKD-end stage kidney disease), atherosclerotic heart disease, prosthetic heart valve, pacemaker, obstructive sleep apnea (spells of absent breathing when sleeping), transient ischemic attack (TIA-brief stroke like event), depression, shortness of breath, and dizziness. R44's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately implement physician's orders for 1 of 1 resident (R44) reviewed for hospitalizations. Findings include: R44's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of 15/15, cognitively intact. R44's undated face sheet listed the following diagnoses: heart failure, arthritis, pain, cellulitis (infection of the cell), pleural effusions (collection of fluid, air, pus, or blood between the lining of the lung and the lung itself, causes difficulty breathing), atrial fibrillation (top chambers of the heart beat erratically), lymphedema (collection of fluid in the extremities), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- lung disease that makes it difficult to breath), chronic kidney disease-stage 4 (CKD-end stage kidney disease), atherosclerotic heart disease, prosthetic heart valve, pacemaker, obstructive sleep apnea (spells of absent breathing when sleeping), transient ischemic attack (TIA-brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to prevent an avoidable pressure injury related to improper placement and use of a mechanical lift sling for 1 of 1 residents (R19) reviewed for pressure injuries. This deficient practice resulted in actual harm for R19 who developed pressure and shearing related injury to his groin, thighs, and buttocks. Findings include: R19's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], showed R19 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15/15 indicating cognitively intact, self-care deficit requiring substantial/maximal assistance for toileting hygiene, upper and lower dressing, positioning and transfers. R19's diagnoses included but were not limited to hemiplegia (weakness or paralysis of one side of the body), bipolar disease (a mental health condition that causes mood swings), and hypertension (high blood pressure). R19's care plan dated 2/14/24 indicated performance of activities of daily living (ADL's) had deteriorated related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Surveyor: [NAME], [NAME] M. Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to perform mechanical lift and lift sling assessments for 1 of 1 residents (R19) to ensure appropriate use and proper size. Further the facility failed to adequately train staff on manufacturers guidelines for use of mechanical lift. This deficient practice had the potential to effect all residents requiring assist with a mechanical lift. Findings include: R19's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], showed R19 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15/15, cognitively intact, self-care deficit requiring substantial/maximal assistance for toileting hygiene, upper and lower dressing, positioning and transfers. R19's diagnoses included hemiplegia (weakness or paralysis of one side of the body) and muscle weakness. R19's care plan dated 2/14/24 indicated R19's ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL's) had deteriorated related to a diagnosis of hemiplegia and required extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure ongoing monitoring of weight was completed as directed for 1 of 3 residents (R45) reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: R45's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R45 was cognitively intact, had poor appetite or overeating, and was independent with eating. The MDS also included diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (too much fat in a patient's blood), and paraplegia (partial or complete paralysis of the lower half of the body. Additionally, the MDS indicated R45 was at risk for pressure ulcers and had at least one stage two, partial thickness pressure ulcer, at least one stage three, full thickness pressure ulcer, one stage four, full thickness pressure ulcer with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle, and at least one unstageable pressure ulcer. R45's care plan dated 1/24/24 indicated R45 had a nutritional risk due to diagnoses of paraplegia, hypertension and hyperlipidemia, weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure post-dialysis assessment and monitoring was completed for 1 of 2 residents (R42) reviewed for dialysis. Findings include: R42's Resident Face Sheet dated 5/31/24, included diagnosis of end stage renal disease (ESDR), hypotension of hemodialysis (low blood pressure), anemia in chronic kidney disease (low red blood cells), and dependence on renal dialysis. R42's physician order report dated 5/31/24, included an order to prepare a PRN dose of midodrine 10 mg (a medication to treat low blood pressure) to send with resident to dialysis Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. Physician order report failed to include orders to monitor AV fistula for a thrill (a specific feeling over the dialysis graft) and a bruit (a whooshing sound heard with a stethoscope over the dialysis graft site) daily. R42's treatments administration history for May 2024 printed 5/30/24, included an order to avoid taking blood pressure or lab draws on left arm and to remind/encourage R42 to keep the pressure dressing intact after dialysis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a clinical rationale for the extended use of an as needed (PRN) antianxiety medication (Ativan) beyond 14 days was documented for 1 of 1 resident (R25) reviewed for hospice services. Findings include: R25's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R25 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of 11 and was a substantial to maximum assist for dressing and cares and dependent for bathing. R25's MDS indicated diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus, dementia (loss of cognitive functioning), hemiparesis (loss of ability to move part of one's body) and anxiety disorder. R25's current physician orders signed 5/1/24, indicated an order for lorazepam (Ativan) 1mg by mouth (PO) every 2 hours as needed (PRN). The start date was 3/13/24 and end date of 9/13/24. R25's medical record lacked clinical rationale for the extended use beyond 14 days. R25's electronic medical record (EMAR) reviewed 5/31/24, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 residents (R35) received a pneumococcal vaccine offered by the facility. Findings include: R35's undated face sheet indicated R35 was [AGE] years of age, admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses of current smoker, traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness (stroke related to bleeding in the brain), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation (top chambers of the heart beat erratically), congestive heart failure (heart does not beat efficiently), and depression. R35's current physician orders reviewed 5/31/24, indicated a physician's order on 2/29/24 which read may receive pneumococcal vaccinations if indicated. R35's progress note dated 3/15/24, indicated R35 had received education and given consent upon admission to receive a dose of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) 15 or PCV-20. R35's vaccination record dated 5/29/24, lacked evidence a pneumococcal vaccination was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure confidentiality of personal records for one of one resident (R1) reviewed. The facility gave R1's medical information to his probation officer and the electric health monitor case manager. Findings Include: R1's Face sheet printed on 4/24/24 indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included alcoholic gastric without bleeding, alcohol induced acute pancreatitis, and alcohol dependence. R1's progress note dated 2/16/24 indicated R1 was admitted to the facility for alcohol induced gastritis, esophagitis, and metabolic acidosis. R1's brief interview for mental status (BIMS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R1 had a score of 15 which meant R1 was cognitively intact. R1's progress note dated 3/14/24 indicated facility staff found empty bottles of alcohol in R1's room. The progress note indicated R1 admitted to drinking two pints of alcohol in the last eight days. R1's progress note dated 3/18/24 indicated R1 had anxiety, nausea,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for source control was worn by all staff, per the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) grid, directing everyone should mask in communal areas of the facility while in COVID-19 outbreak status. This had the opportunity to affect all residents and visitors. Findings include: The CDC PPE grid directs source control is recommended by those residing or working on a unit or area of the facility experiencing a SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) or other outbreak of respiratory infection; universal use of source control could be discontinued as mitigation measure once the outbreak is over; no new cases of COVID-19 have been identified for 14 days. On 12/12/23 at 9:27 a.m., at the entrance of the facility, a sign indicated the facility had three cases of COVID in the building. On 12/12/23 at 9:27 a.m., a facility document posted on the wall in the entrance of the facility dated 4/17/23 directed masks were no longer required while in the building. On 12/12/23 at 9:27 a.m., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide a timely influenza immunization as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) for 1 of 5 residents (R2) residents reviewed for immunizations. Findings include: The CDC recommends before an outbreak occurs the influenza vaccination should be provided routinely to all residents and healthcare personnel of long-term care facilities. If possible, all residents should receive inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) annually before influenza season. For persons aged =65 years, the following quadrivalent influenza vaccines are recommended: high-dose IIV, adjuvanted IIV, or recombinant influenza vaccine. If not available, standard-dose IIV may be given. R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated he had a medial diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease. The MDS assessment lacked documentation of influenza immunization. R2's Influenza Consent form signed by R2 on 10/18/23 indicated he wished to receive the influenza immunization. R2's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$14,015 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $14,015 — penalty dated 2026-02-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MISSIONS, INC PROGRAMSOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 04/17/1975
AURAND, CLAUDIAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2021
BARKER, JOELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2021
BILLY, STACEYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2021
BOBO, CYNTHIAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2023
DANIELS, KATHRYNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2022
DETERMAN, TERESAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2022
FALLON, TAMARAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2021
KIWUS, KELLYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2023
MANNIX, PETERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/01/2023
MEYER, ELLENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2022
MONCRIEF, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/20/2025
NETTLES, ANDREAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2023
SENKBEIL, MARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2020
SONNTAG, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2010
SPAULDING, WENDYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2023
WHITMAN, ANDREWIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2020
WOLD, DENNISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2022
COLLINS, LUCASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/05/2018
O'BRIEN, LINDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/26/2019
RODRIGUEZ, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 92%Medicare 1%Other / private 7%

About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$428per resident / day
operating cost
$13,001per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$397per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Minnesota
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,870/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,573/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245546. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next