Samaritan Bethany Home On Eighth

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 140 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 112 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 94.2 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.77 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-03-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to follow the care plan for transfers to prevent or mitigate risk for falls and/or falls with major injury for 2 of 4 residents (R1 and R4) reviewed for falls. This resulted in actual harm for R1 who experienced a witnessed ground level fall resulting in a subdural, subarachnoid, and intraventricular hemorrhages, two left rib fractures, and a left clavicle fracture, requiring intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization for eight days. Findings include: Subdural hemorrhage is a serious medical condition where blood collects beneath the dura mater, the outermost membrane surrounding the brain. This accumulation of blood puts pressure on the brain, potentially causing life-threatening consequences. Subarachnoid hemorrhage is bleeding in the space between the brain and the tissue covering the brain. Intraventricular hemorrhage is bleeding inside or around the ventricles-spaces in the brain that contain the cerebral spinal fluid. Bleeding in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-26 · tag F0552 — pattern
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to obtain and document an informed consent, including with explanation of risk and benefits and alternatives for psychotropic medications for 3 of 5 residents (R10, R22) reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include:R22R22's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/10/26, indicated R22 had intact cognition with no hallucinations, delusion, or rejection of care. MDS indicated R22 was on an antidepressant (psychotropic medication).R22's medical diagnosis report, dated 3/24/26, included the following relevant diagnoses: major depressive disorder, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a critical condition where the lungs are unable to adequately oxygenate the blood), acute on chronic congestive heart failure (a life-threatening condition when your heart cannot deliver enough oxygen to your body), and type 2 diabetes (condition which results in elevated blood sugar levels).R22's Order Summary Report, dated 3/24/26, included the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe independent medication administration for 1 of 1 residents (R59) reviewed for self-administration. Findings include: R59's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated R59 was cognitively intact with no delirium or behaviors, no upper/lower body impairment, and was independent with activities of daily living and transfers. R59's diagnoses list included back pain, high blood pressure, depression, high cholesterol, osteoporosis, indigestion, and vitamin d deficiency R59's careplan indicated R59 was independent with activities of daily living. R59's medication administration record indicated R59 receives the following scheduled medications: -Morning: atorvastatin 40mg (high cholesterol), vitamin d 50 mcg (supplement), losartan 37.5 mg (high blood pressure), omeprazole 20 mg (indigestion), sertraline 100 mg (depression), senna-s 1 tablet (stool softener), acetaminophen 1000 mg (pain)-Noon: calcium citrate 3 tablets (calcium…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide a clean room and bathroom for 1 of 1 resident (R11) reviewed for a safe, clean, comfortable, home-like environment.Findings include: R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), identified R11 was cognitively intact, was hard of hearing, had clear speech, had the ability to understand, and had no refusals of care. R11's diagnosis included heart failure, high blood pressure, anxiety and malnutrition (requiring feeding through an external tube medically inserted through the abdominal wall) During an observation and interview on 3/23/26 at 8:36 a.m., R11's room identified the intravenous (IV) pole, used when giving tube feeding, had several drops of tube feeding on all four legs extending from the base. The floor around the IV pole had carpet stained with tube feeding residue. The bathroom sink counter had dried brown drops that appeared to be residue from crushed medication. The bathroom sink basin had dried, tan-colored residue in it. The floor between the television and foot of bed had 3 pieces of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure appropriate medication side effect monitoring for psychotropic medication use was completed for 1 of 5 residents (R22) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: R22's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/10/26, indicated R22 had intact cognition with no hallucinations, delusion, or rejection of care. MDS indicated R22 was on an antidepressant (psychotropic medication). R22's medical diagnosis report, dated 3/24/26, included the following relevant diagnoses: major depressive disorder, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a critical condition where the lungs are unable to adequately oxygenate the blood), acute on chronic congestive heart failure (a life-threatening condition when your heart cannot deliver enough oxygen to your body), and type 2 diabetes (condition which results in elevated blood sugar levels). R22's baseline care plan, dated 3/4/26, indicated R22 used antidepressant medications related to depression with the goal to be free from adverse reactions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed according to standards of care to prevent respiratory infections for 1 of 1 residents (R22) who was admitted for acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a critical condition where the lungs are unable to adequately oxygenate the blood) who required oxygen.Findings include:R22's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/10/26, indicated R22 had intact cognition with no hallucinations, delusion, or rejection of care with admission date of 3/4/26. Section O indicated R22 required continuous oxygen therapy.R22's medical diagnosis report indicated on 3/4/26, R22's primary diagnosis for admission to the facility was acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Additional relevant diagnoses included: acute on chronic congestive heart failure (a life-threatening condition when your heart cannot deliver enough oxygen to your body), acute eosinophilic pneumonia (lung disease that develops suddenly that progresses rapidly to sever respiratory failure), and atrial fibrillation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 direct-care nursing staff (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-A) was appropriately trained and competent in the assessment and care of tube feeding and lidocaine patch application for 1 of 1 (R11) resident.Findings include: R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], R11 had a gastric tube surgically implanted 8/14/25 to provide enteral feedings due to malnutrition R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), identified R11 was cognitively intact, was hard of hearing, had clear speech, had the ability to understand, and had no refusals of care. R11's diagnosis included heart failure, high blood pressure, anxiety, and malnutrition requiring a feeding tube medically inserted through R11'S abdominal wall. R11's current, undated physician's orders included:Enteral tube Feed of Nutren 1.5 at 100 (milliliters/hour (ml/hr) for a total of 250 ml, twice per day.60 ml water flush before and after enteral feedings.Medications given via…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for 1 of 1 resident (R11) reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP).Findings include: R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R11 was cognitively intact, was hard of hearing, had clear speech, had the ability to understand, and had no refusals of care. R11's diagnosis included heart failure, high blood pressure, anxiety and malnutrition (requiring feeding through an external tube medically inserted through the abdominal wall). R11 had a percutaneous endoscopic gastronomy (PEG tube) placed on 8/14/25 due to complete intestinal blockage. A PEG tube is considered an indwelling medical device, according to the Center for Disease Control (CDC). Due to this, R11 required additional personal protective equipment (PPE) requiring Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) isolation. EBP are designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to accommodate resident needs by ensuring the call light was accessible for 2 of 2 residents (R60, R187) reviewed for call lights. Findings include: R60's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified R60 with cognitive impairment, diagnoses included Parkinson's, heart failure, osteoarthritis, and non-Alzheimer's dementia. R60's care plan with start date of 12/6/23 identified, Be sure my call light is within reach and encourage me to use it for assistance as needed. I need response to all requests for assistance. R60's [NAME] (nursing assistant care sheet) printed 12/12/24 at 11:13 a.m., instructed nursing assistants to, Please remind me to utilize my call light, as I am getting used to my new environment. During observation and interview on 12/9/24 at 3:00 p.m., R60 sitting in wheelchair in his room watching the television set. Call light cord was placed on nightstand behind him out of reach. R60 stated the call light, [was] not in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately transcribe physician's orders into the electronic heath record (EHR) for 1 of 3 residents (R1) who recieved 14 wrong doses of aspirin. Findings include: R1's physician visit dated 2/23/24, identified R1 to have quite a bit of drainage from her nose, constant in nature and many times is bloody/serosanguinous (yellowish with samll amounts of blood) from history of recurring nose bleeds was receiving aspirin (medication to thin the blood) 325 milligrams (mg) daily. New orders to discontinue aspirin 325 mg daily and change to aspirin 81 mg daily due to frequent nose bleeds. R1's order summary dated 2/23/24, identified an order of aspirin 325 mg daily for permanent atrial fibrillation. R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 to have severe cognitive impairment and diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (An irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), thrombocytopenia (low platelets) and hypertension…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE) when entering a COVID positive resident (R73) room after the facility failed to ensure all staff were fit tested (test used to determine appropriately sized N95 mask) for the use of N95 masks. This had the potential to affect all 84 residents in the facility. In addition, the facility failed to ensure protection from blood-borne pathogens when an outside lab technician (lab tech) was observed drawing blood from R334 at the dining room table. This had the potential to affect 2 of 2 residents (R3 and R51) and a family member who were also seated at the table. Findings include: During an observation on 1/30/24 at 12:25 p.m., a dietary aide (DA-A) was observed entering R73's room wearing face shield, gown, and surgical mask. A sign on the outside of R73's room indicated caution PPE required. Another sign on the door demonstrated putting on PPE. A white cart containing PPE supplies…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$27,555 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $27,555 — penalty dated 2024-03-14
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-09 for 3 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN