Sholom Home West

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 241 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 157 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 139 beds and averages 130.1 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.39 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.34 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.90 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.51 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.46 to 1.04 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 19% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman for Long Term Care (OMB - LTC) was notified of resident transfers or discharges for 3 of 5 residents (R73, R139, R141) reviewed for transfers or discharges from the facility. Findings include: R73's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R73 was cognitively intact, and diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, and neuralgia and neuritis (general nerve pain or inflammation). R73's progress note, dated 2/16/26 at 5:43 p.m., indicated R73 was sent to the hospital for blood emesis and loss of consciousness. A subsequent progress note, dated 2/25/26 at 4:05 p.m., indicated R73 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] at 2:00 p.m. The facility's Monthly Notice to OMB-LTC of Emergency Acute Care Transfers and Discharges, dated February 2026, lacked notice of R73's hospital transfer on 2/16/26. R139's comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE], indicated R139 had moderate cognitive impairment and diagnoses included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident records upon discharge were complete and accurate for 1 of 1 resident (R141) reviewed for discharge.Findings Include - R141's Face Sheet (undated) documented the diagnoses of sepsis due to methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus ( a germ found on people's skin ), pneumonia, acute and subacute infective endocarditis (inflammation of the heart's inner lining).R141's Minimum Data Set (MDS), with a registered nurse signing date of 2/07/26, documented R141 was moderately cognitively impaired and require set up to moderate assistance with all activities of daily living.R141's nurse progress notes on 2/08/26, indicated R141 had eloped from the facility and was later found wondering at Target. Family arrived and returned R141 to the facility (this was later investigated by the Minnesota Department of Health - Rapid Response Team). Upon returning to the facility, R141's daughter insisted on taking resident home. R141's provider was contacted, and discharge orders were received.R141's electronic medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to complete proper disinfection of a blood glucose monitor for 1 of 1 resident (R10) reviewed for glucose monitoring.Findings include: R10's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R10 was cognitively intact, and diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, chronic kidney disease and diabetes. R10's Physician Order Report, dated 2/18/26 - 3/18/26, indicated an order for blood glucose monitoring twice a day for diabetes. During observation and interview on 3/18/26 at 8:26 a.m., registered nurse (RN)-C was observed using an Assure Platinum blood glucose monitor (BGM) to check R10's blood glucose level. After RN-C completed the task and returned to the medication cart with the BGM, RN-C donned gloves, pulled a wipe from a blue-topped canister of PDI Sani-Hands Instant Hand Sanitizing Wipes, wiped the entire BGM with the wipe, and stated she would leave it out to dry. During interview on 3/18/26 at 8:55 a.m., RN-C stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain resident equipment cleanliness of intravenous (IV) poles for 1 of 1 resident (R86) reviewed for tube feeding.R86's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R86 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). R86 diagnoses included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing food or liquids) following stroke, hypertension, gastrostomy tube (tube into stomach for feeding), hemiplegia (paralysis on one side) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness) following stroke, and encephalopathy (group of conditions that cause brain dysfunction). On 3/17/26 at 8:40 a.m., observed IV pole in R86's room with tube feeding pump attached. The pole, pole legs, and floor below were observed to have tan colored, dried substance that dripped down the pole, covered all five legs with several dried spots on the floor. Follow up observations on 3/18/26 at 10:08 a.m.; 3/18/26 at 1:55 p.m.;…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide a call light to one of three residents (R2) reviewed for access to call lights when R2 did not have a functioning call light for an unknown number of weeks. Findings Include: R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE], indicated R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS indicated R2 was continent of bowel and bladder, and independent with toileting. R2's brief interview for mental status (BIMS) was 15 indicating intact cognition. The census report, undated, indicated R2 moved to room [ROOM NUMBER] on 3/7/24. R2's Quarterly Review MDS dated [DATE], indicated R2 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. R2's Significant Change in Status MDS dated [DATE], indicated R2 required moderate assistance with toileting. R2's care plan indicated the call light was to be accessible and within reach whenever the resident was in his room. The facility was unable to provide call light log for R2's room for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure grievance forms and procedures were posted in prominent locations throughout the facility for residents and resident representatives to file grievances, and anonymously if desired for 4 of 4 residents (R26, R35, R102 and R104) reviewed for grievances. Findings include: On 1/7/25 at 1:37 p.m., a resident council meeting was held with four residents which included R26 R26, R35, R102 and R104. During the resident council meeting, all four residents indicated they were not aware how to file a grievance form. R35 stated she thought there was a form at the front door that could be filled out and turned into a nurse. R35 further stated she did not think the form could be filled out without the help of a nurse. During an observation on 1/7/25 at 4:36 p.m., the 340 wing had a slot for grievance forms but no forms were present. During an observation/Interview on 1/7/25 at 4:43 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-F stated grievance forms are not kept on the 340 wing. RN-F further stated the forms were down stairs and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to hold care conference meetings with the resident and/or their representative to allow the resident and/or representative the opportunity to review and participate in the revision of the care plan for 5 of 5 residents (R14, R105, R6, R74,R97) reviewed for care planning. Findings include: R14's facesheet printed on 1/8/25, included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia, depression, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and congestive heart failure (heart doesn't pump as it should). R14's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R14 was cognitively intact, had clear speech, could understand and be understood. R14 was independent with activities of daily living (ADL) and with ambulation. R14's care plan dated 4/14/23, indicated R14's wishes would be respected, and her wishes would be reviewed at quarterly care conferences. Care plan dated 8/2/24, indicated R14's code status would be reviewed with each care conference. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and document review, the facility failed to provide a process by which residents could make their own food selections for meals for 6 of 6 residents (R241, R73, R6, R23, R104, R35) reviewed for food. Findings include: R241's facesheet printed on 1/8/25, included diagnoses of chronic kidney disease and congestive heart failure (heart doesn't pump as it should). R241's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R241 was cognitively intact, had clear speech, could understand and be understood. R241 required supervision for most activities of daily living (ADL) and could eat independently after set-up help. R241's orders dated 12/17/24, indicated a heart healthy diet. R241's care plan dated 12/20/24, indicated R241's preferences would be honored during her stay. Staff responsible for this included nursing and nutritional services. During an interview on 1/6/25 at 3:49 p.m., R241 stated she had been at the facility since 12/17/24, and had not been given a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to complete a level II preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) for 1 of 2 residents (R95) reviewed with a new mental illness diagnosis. Findings include: R95's facesheet printed on 1/8/25, indicated R95's original admission date was 12/16/22, and diagnoses at the time of admission included malnutrition, failure to thrive, anxiety, and repeated falls. Further review of the diagnosis listed on face sheet, indicated R95 was diagnosed with delusional disorders, major depressive disorder, and borderline personality disorder on 7/16/24. R95's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R95 had moderately impaired cognition, felt depressed half or more of the days and felt bad about himself nearly every day. R95's current physician orders printed 1/8/25, included risperidone 0.5mg tablet at bedtime for delusional disorders and citalopram 20mg tablet daily for psychosis. Record review of R95's PASARR screen completed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's preferred activities for individual entertainment were offered for 1 of 1 resident (R97) reviewed for activities. Findings include: R97's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R74 was admitted on [DATE], preferred language was Spanish and needed/wanted an interpreter to communicate with a doctor or health care staff, moderate cognitive impairment, required partial/moderate assistance with toileting hygiene, upper body dressing, personal hygiene, and utilized a wheelchair, diagnoses included dementia, anxiety, and depression and no rejection of care. R97's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated it was somewhat important to participate in favorite activities, listen to music, and to go outside and get fresh air when the weather is good. R97's progress note dated 9/16/23 at 1:05 p.m., therapeutic recreation (TR)-A indicated R97 often fatigued/sleeping, pleasant and sometimes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN