Capital View Transitional Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 295 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 185 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 2.66 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 100% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 50% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 32 beds and averages 29.2 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.36 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.31 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 6.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.91 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.44 to 2.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a skin tear had continued monitoring and treatment for 1 of 1 resident (R17) reviewed for non-pressure skin injuries. Findings include: R17's face sheet dated 11/12/25, indicated R17 was recently admitted to the facility and had diagnoses of pathological compression fractures of the cervical spine and squamous cell cancer involving the bone.R17's Wound Care Alert dated 11/12/25, indicated R17 had a skin tear on the right forearm that was covered with a mepelix (foam protective dressing). The document lacked indication of an assessment or description of the skin tear. R17's daily skin assessments dated 11/12/25- 1/17/25, indicated R17 had a skin tear, however lacked where it was located or if further monitoring or treatments were provided.R17's provider and nursing orders as of 11/17/25, lacked indication of treatment orders for R17's skin tear.A facility document titled Standing Orders dated 2/2025, directed staff to cleanse minor skin tears, and cover with non-adherent dressing. Furthermore, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the State Agency (SA) immediately (within two hours) for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for allegations of abuse. Findings include: R1's 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R1 had moderately impaired cognition with diagnoses which included diverticulitis with recent surgery on the gastrointestinal tract. A Facility Reported Event (FRI) submitted to the SA on 6/11/25 at 4:25 p.m. indicated on the evening shift of 6/6/25 R1 told a social worker a nurse had put their hands on R1's neck, and pushed her back into bed. R1 was not sure if the nurse was going to choke her. R1 was in shock over what happened, but was not physically harmed. On 6/16/25 at 3:31 p.m., R1 stated she told nursing assistant (NA)-A, registered nurse (RN)-A had tried to choke her on the evening of 6/6/25. NA-A told her he would report it to someone higher. RN-A came back into R1's room and was questioning her. R1 stated she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a self-administration of medications (SAM) assessment was completed to allow residents to safely administer their own medications for 1 of 1 resident (R171) observed with medications at the bedside. Findings include: R171's Entry Tracking Record dated 11/25/24, indicated R171 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R171's face sheet dated 12/4/24 at 11:23 a.m., indicated the following diagnoses: reactive airway disease, closed fracture of the right humerus (upper arm), closed left hand fracture, osteoporosis (a disease that weakens bones) with pathological fracture (a fracture due to underlying disease), closed nondisplaced fracture of first metacarpal (bone near the thumb) bone of the left hand, closed displaced (out of alignment) fracture of shaft of first metacarpal bone of left hand. R171's temporary care plan (TCP) dated 11/25/24, indicated intact cognition. Additionally, the TCP indicated on 12/4/24, R171 could SAM inhalers…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure that an opened medication was labeled and contained the correct expiration date for one of one resident (R126), and failed to ensure an expiration date was documented on an opened medication for one of one resident (R176) reviewed. Further, staff were not aware of the correct expiration date of an insulin medication once opened. Findings include: The Admelog website, products.sanofi.us/admelog/admelog.pdf indicated opened Admelog insulin vials must be used within 28 days or be discarded, even if they still contained Admelog. R126: R126's face sheet form dated [DATE] at 11:32 a.m., indicated R126 had a diagnosis of type two diabetes. R126's physician's orders form indicated the following order: • [DATE], insulin lispro (Humalog, Admelog) injection vial, inject 10 units three times a day with meals. During interview and observation on [DATE] between 8:10 a.m., and 8:45 a.m., registered nurse (RN)-B pulled a multi-dose vial of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to follow nationally recognized best practices regarding isolation precaution for communicable diseases for 1 of 4 residents (R7) this had the potential to affect 8 residents who resided on the unit. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during incontinent cares for 1 of 1 resident (R6) reviewed for infection control practices. Findings include: R7's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R7 was cognitively intact, did not refuse cares, and incontinent of bladder and bowel. R7 had impairment to both upper extremities. R7 required substantial/maximal assistance for dressing and toileting hygiene, partial/moderate assistance for toilet transfers, and supervision or touching assistance for eating. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, urinary tract infection in the last 30 days, diabetes mellitus, and hemiplegia (loss of ability to move one side of the body) or hemiparesis (partial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess residents' eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccination according to The Centers of Disease and Control and Prevention (CDC) for 5 of 5 (R7, R6, R74, R4) residents reviewed for vaccinations. Findings include: R7's admission MDS dated [DATE], indicated R7 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of diabetes and chronic kidney failure. Furthermore, R7's MDS indicated R7 was up to date with the pneumococcal vaccine. R7's facility immunization record dated 12/26/23, indicated R7's PPV status was up to date and was received 10/9/17. R72's immunization record lacked what PPV dose(s) had previously been given. R7's Minnesota Immunization Information Connection (MIIC) report printed 2/5/24, indicated R7 had recieved PCV13 on 10/19/17. Review of the current CDC recommendations 03/15/23, indicated one dose of the PCV20 given at least one year after the PCV13 would complete R7's pneumococcal vaccinations. R6's admission Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were passed without an error rate greater than 5 percent (%) by failing to follow administration instructions for 1 of 6 residents (R74) observed for medication administration. There were 30 opportunities for medication administration with two errors. This resulted in an error rate of 6.67%. Findings include: R74's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated no cognitive impairment with diagnoses including pneumonia, acute (short-term) respiratory failure, heart failure and atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rhythm). R74's physician orders observed for morning medication pass included the following: - potassium chloride (Klor-Con M) extended release 20 milliequivalents (mEq) oral tablet once daily, should be swallowed whole, for treatment of low potassium levels, dated 1/23/24. - furosemide (Lasix) tablet 40 milligrams (mg) oral tablet once daily for treatment of heart failure, dated 1/17/24. -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN