No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Cerenity Care Center On Humboldt

512 Humboldt Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55107 · Non profit - Corporation · 93 certified beds · (651) 220-1700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (651) 220-1700 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0609) — most recent Mar 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 actual-harm citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$69,031 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $69,031 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-15)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2004 Ford Pkwy · (612) 256-8225 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
130 Wabasha St S · (651) 829-2240 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
466 S Robert St · (651) 224-2433 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Ken Yackel-West Side Arena, 44 Isabel St E · (651) 215-0000 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.2%18.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.2%4.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.9%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.3%2.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.3%4.1%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%4.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.4%20.5%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.8%12.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.5%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.9%5.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.2%24.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.1%17.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.9%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine79.3%82.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.9%23.5%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.3%14.8%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.8%CMS range 36.5–59.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 7.8–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge63.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge69.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.2%CMS range 4.7–13.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.831.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.03
RN hours/ resident / day
0.83
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.98
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.84
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.74
RN hoursweekends
52.9%
Total nursing turnover
70.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 93 beds and averages 80.1 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.03 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.15 to 0.74 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-05)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement physician prescribed treatment orders for wound care, notify the physician of signs and symptoms of infection and labs results for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for wound care. This resulted in a delay of treatment for R1 when R1's right great toe trauma injury wound and left second toe trauma injury developed osteomyelitis (bone infection) and required amputation of both toes. The IJ began on 11/30/24, when R1's right great toe and left second toe were amputated. The administrator and director of nursing (DON) were informed of the IJ on 12/5/24 at 5:17 p.m. The facility had implemented corrective action on 12/3/24, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet dated 7/23/24, indicated R1 had diagnoses of type 2 diabetes with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage which can cause pain or numbness to feet, hands, and legs), peripheral vascular disease (circulation disorder that affects blood vessels outside of the heart), and end stage renal disease (ESRD)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for falls. This resulted in actual harm when R4 fell and suffered a femur fracture. The facility implemented immediate corrective action, so the deficient practice was issued at past non-compliance. Findings include: R4's face sheet dated 5/16/25, identified diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (a disease of the central nervous system that affects movement), depression (persistent sadness), and anxiety (a common human emotion involving feelings of worry, nervousness, or unease). R4's Physical Therapy (PT) evaluation dated 4/22/25, identified that R4 was admitted the facility due to weakness and without further PT she would be at increased risk for falls and functional decline. R4 was modified independence with contact guard assistance (one or two hands on body to support balance or steady body) for transfers. R4's admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to ensure residents received the care and assistance they needed in a timely manner for 4 of 5 residents (R5, R1, R3, & R6) reviewed for call lights. This caused actual harm to R5 when she waited nearly three hours for her call light to be answered causing her to experience increased anxiety, distress, fear, and feelings of worthlessness and helplessness. Findings include: R5 R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated she had intact cognition and no behaviors or rejections of care. R5 had diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (chronic disease affecting the central nervous system), anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and morbid obesity. R5 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder and required substantial staff assistance with toileting hygiene, bathing, dressing, and mobility in bed. R5 was dependent on staff for transfers and used a motorized wheelchair independently. R5's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to comprehensively assess and follow the hospital discharge orders to keep a cast completely dry for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for orders. R1 was harmed when he was admitted to the facility with a post-surgical cast covering his right leg with orders that the cast must remain dry, and the facility failed to keep the cast dry. R1 was sent to the hospital where the cast was found to be soiled with urine and feces, contributing to continuous infections. Findings include: R1's hospital discharge information to the facility dated 6/25/24 indicated R1 was medically complicated. R1 had a right knee open reduction dislocated hinged total knee arthroplasty revision on 6/20/24 with confirmation of infectious bacteria: staphylococcus aureus and pseudomonas aeruginosa. Following the lab results R1 underwent placement of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line to directly treat the bacteria infections with antibiotics. R1 had a history chronic and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-07-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for pressure ulcers received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure or worsening of pre-admission pressure ulcers. R1 was harmed when the facility failed to promote healing of current pressure ulcers and prevent new ulcers from developing. R1 was admitted with two pressure ulcers, and a shearing wound on 6/26/26. R1 discharged from the facility on 7/7/14 with three pressure ulcers and the shearing wound turned into stage II pressure ulcers in multiple areas from his thigh to his mid-dorsal back. R1's hospital discharge information to the facility dated 6/25/24 indicated R1 was medically complicated. R1 had a right knee open reduction dislocated hinged total knee arthroplasty revision on 6/20/24 with confirmation of infectious bacteria: staphylococcus aureus and pseudomonas aeruginosa. Following the lab results R1 underwent placement of a peripherally inserted central catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, homelike environment for 2 of 2 residents (R45, R2) who received nutrition via tube feeding.Findings include: R45 R45's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R45's cognition could not be assessed, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs), and required nutrition through a feeding tube. R45's diagnosis included traumatic brain injury (a condition resulting from an injury to the head causing disruption of normal brain function and can affect cognition, speech, and physical abilities). R45's care plan dated 10/3/25, indicated potential for altered nutritional/hydration status related to tube feeding. R45's care plan instructed staff to administer tube feeding with water flushes per provider order. R45's care plan further indicated R45 also received an oral diet with modified textures for pleasure or comfort. R45's provider order dated 3/2/26, indicated, Tube Feeding: Continue with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure an antipsychotic medication (medication that works by changing the effects of chemicals in the brain) had a qualifying diagnosis to support its use for 1 of 5 residents (R8) reviewed who required antipsychotic medicationsFindings include:R8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified moderate cognitive impairment. R8 did not hallucinate, have delusions, behaviors, wander or reject care during the assessment period. R8 took an antipsychotic medication in the last seven days, and an indication was noted.R8's psychotropic drug use care plan dated 2/27/26, identified psychotropic medication was in use, to administer medications per MD (medical doctor) order, monthly medication record review by pharmacist, and monitor for target behaviors daily.R8's provider orders dated 9/17/25, identified Risperdal (risperidone, an antipsychotic medication) two milligrams (mg) tablets by mouth at bedtime for a diagnosis of major depressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure the manufacturer's recommended sling size was used for 1 of 1 resident (R79) reviewed for mechanical lift transfers. Findings include: R79's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition and no behaviors. R79 had impairment to upper and lower extremities, was dependent staff for bed to chair transfers and had a diagnosis of traumatic brain dysfunction. R79 had no falls since the prior assessment.R79's admission Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 9/17/25, identified the CAA triggered due to assistance required in ADLs, impaired balance and transition during transfers and functional impairment in activity. Contributing factors included generalized weakness.R79's ADL care plan dated 9/11/25, identified two staff assist was required with full body mechanical lift with a sling size of medium.R79's Safe Lifting and Movement assessment dated [DATE], identified he could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure administration of tube feeding formula according to provider orders for 1 of 1 resident (R45) reviewed for tube feeding. Findings include:R45's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R45's cognition could not be assessed, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs), and required nutrition through a feeding tube. R45's diagnosis included traumatic brain injury (a condition resulting from an injury to the head causing disruption of normal brain function and can affect cognition, speech, and physical abilities). R45's care plan dated 10/3/25, indicated potential for altered nutritional/hydration status related to tube feeding. R45's care plan instructed staff to administer tube feeding with water flushes per provider order. R45's care plan further indicated R45 also received an oral diet with modified textures for pleasure or comfort.R45's nutrition progress note by registered dietician (RD)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was properly maintained for 1 of 1 resident (R44) reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include:R44's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R44 had intact cognition, required partial/moderate assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs), and required oxygen therapy while a resident. R44's diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, congestive heart failure (CHF) and dependence on supplemental oxygen. R44's care plan dated 1/15/26, indicated R44 required special treatments including oxygen therapy. R44's treatment administration record (TAR) dated 2/15/26 through 3/2/26, indicated, Change humidifying jar [bubbler] weekly.once a day on Sun. The TAR indicated the task was signed off as completed on 2/15/26, 2/22/26, and 3/1/26. During observation on 3/2/26 at 1:35 p.m., R44 was in her room in a wheelchair with oxygen administered via nasal canula at 2 liters per minute. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure new medication orders were transcribed correctly to ensure accurate medication administration for 1 of 1 resident (R79) who was reviewed for recent medication changes. Findings include:R79's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition and no behaviors. R79 had impairment to upper and lower extremities, was dependent on staff for bed to chair transfers and had a diagnosis of traumatic brain dysfunction.R79's Cognitive loss/Dementia care plan dated 1/20/26, identified a diagnosis of cognitive loss from a traumatic brain dysfunction. R79 would receive services and assistance needed specific to his cognitive function. R79's family member assisted with decision making.R79's hospital After Visit Summary (AVS) dated 2/27/26 at 9:53 p.m., identified he was seen due to redness of skin, seizure like activity and fever. Instructions included to stop taking lacosamide which is an anti-seizure medication, and to start taking levetiracetam (Keppra) which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure consultant pharmacist recommendations were followed up timely for 1 of 5 residents (R8) reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include:R8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified moderate cognitive impairment. R8 did not hallucinate, have delusions, behaviors, wander or reject care during the assessment period. R8 took an antipsychotic medication (medication that works by changing the effects of chemicals in the brain) in the last seven days, and an indication was noted.R8's psychotropic drug use care plan dated 2/27/26, identified psychotropic medication was in use, to administer medications per MD (medical doctor) order, monthly medication record review by pharmacist, and monitor for target behaviors daily.R8's prescription orders dated 9/17/25, identified Risperdal (risperidone. antipsychotic medication) two milligrams (mg) tablets by mouth at bedtime for a diagnosis of major depressive disorder, single episode,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 2 of 2 residents (R19 and R2) observed for EBP.Findings include: R19 R19's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified moderately impaired cognition, no behaviors or rejection of care. R19 required substantial/maximal assistance with eating, bathing and dressing. Diagnoses included orthopedic aftercare. R19 had two unhealed pressure ulcers classified as unstageable (wounds where the extent of tissue damage cannot be identified) and present upon admission. R19's admission pressure ulcer Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 12/17/25, triggered due to actual pressure ulcers. Care plan interventions would be initiated to improve current activities of daily living status and functional ability. R19's care plan dated 2/14/26, identified he was on EBP for osteomyelitis (bone infection) and presence of a wound. Interventions included implement EBP according to facility protocol. Clear…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of maltreatment to the state agency within two hours after the allegation was made for 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed for reporting of alleged violations of maltreatment. R2 reported the allegations of maltreatment to dietary aide (DA)-A on 11/11/2025 and the facility did not report the allegations to the state agency.Findings include: R2's face sheet printed on 11/18/25, indicated R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a primary diagnosis of repeated falls. R2's additional diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, unspecified dementia with unspecified severity and other behavioral disturbance, adult failure to thrive, psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition, major depressive disorder, restlessness and agitation, violent behavior-aggression, vascular dementia that is severe with agitation, and anxiety disorder. R2 had two admissions to the facility prior to her current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-15 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee identified, investigated, analyzed, and responded to excessively long call light response times by developing and implementing action plans for process improvement identified to be a current concern with past identified non compliancy. This had the potential to affect all 81 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: The facility's QAPI Program Plan dated September 2024, identified the purpose of the quality program was to provide quality and performance excellence in care and service delivery. The plan included various areas of care and service with an ongoing process to select and monitor data. Quality focus areas identified by both the facility and community included regulatory compliance and customer concerns. Data was collected for regulatory compliance from CMS-2567 forms as it occurred and the threshold (level of performance that requires a reaction) was identified as compliance. Customer concern data was collected monthly from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders and failed to identify and report medication errors for 2 of 3 (R1, R2) residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: R1 R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute pain due to trauma and dorsalgia (pain in the upper back). R1 was on a scheduled pain medication regimen and received as needed (PRN) pain medications. R1's care plan revised 2/6/25, identified R1 experienced pain and discomfort. Interventions included administration of scheduled and PRN pain medication. R1's care plan also identified risk for alteration of skin status. Interventions included ensuring protective skin measures (barrier cream to dry areas and wheelchair cushion) were in place. R1's physician orders included an order for miconazole nitrate 2% topical cream (antifungal cream used to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to provide adaptive eating utensils according to the care plan for 1 of 1 resident (R7) reviewed for nutrition. Findings include R7's face sheet dated 5/16/25, identified diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic inflammatory disorder affecting joints in hands or feet). R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R7 was independent in eating and had intact cognition. R7's nutritional status focus care plan dated 5/7/25, identified a potential for altered nutrition related to rheumatoid arthritis, with an intervention of built-up utensils with all meals and culinary to provide. R7's nursing assistant care sheet dated 5/15/25, identified that R7 needed built-up utensils provided by the kitchen. R7's daily meal cards dated 5/15/25, identified R7 was to have built up utensils for all meals. R7's registered dietician progress note dated 3/6/25, identified R7 has continued to need built-up silverware to help with self-feeding related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain a complete, accurately documented, and readily accessible medical record in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 2 of 3 residents (R2, R3) reviewed for documentation. Findings include: R2 R2's facesheet indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R2's electronic health record (EHR) was reviewed on 5/15/25. The EHR lacked any primary care provider (medical doctor, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant) visit notes from R2's current admission starting 12/3/24. During an interview on 5/15/25 at 10:46 a.m., the director of nursing (DON) confirmed there were no primary care provider visit notes in R2's EHR. R2's primary care provider visit notes were retrieved from the primary care provider's external medical records system by facility staff. Visit notes provided to surveyors absent from the facility's EHR included eight total visits from dates: 12/4/24, 12/17/24, 12/24/24, 1/7/25, 2/19/25, 3/25/25, 4/2/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to ensure residents received care and assistance they needed (R127, R35, R281, R11, R25, R59) for 6 of 7 residents reviewed for staffing needs. This had the potential to affect all 85 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: The facility's payroll-based journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report dated 7/1/24 through 9/30/24, identified excessively low weekend staffing as an area of concern. R127's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition and diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side and abnormalities of gait and mobility. It further indicated R127 was frequently incontinent of bowel, bladder and required assistance with toileting. R127's care plan dated 2/1/24, indicated R127 will have less than 2 episodes of bowel incontinence per day, will be continent of bowel at all times, and will be continent of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure expired food items were removed from service, food items were labeled and dated, and food was stored in a manner to prevent cross contamination from resident care items. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure follow up and maintenance of a leaking refrigerator, routine maintenance of the dishwasher and overall cleanliness of the kitchen was maintained. Findings include: A facility kitchen/kitchenette cleaning log was requested however was not received. An email recieved 1/13/25, at 2:50 p.m., the administrator stated the last work order for the 4th floor refirdgerator was on 7/16/24. A new order was placed and contractors have been notified to remedy the issue. Kitchenettes An observation on 1/13/25 at 8:56 a.m., the 4th floor kitchenette was reviewed. The refrigerator contained a container of opened Molly's Kitchen premade egg salad with a use by date was 1/7/25. An opened bottle of [NAME] prune juice had a best by date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure transmission-based precautions (TBP) were followed for 1 of 1 resident (R38) who required TPB during medication administration and failed to ensure a glucose meter was disinfected per manufacturer's guidelines after resident use for 1 of 1 residents (R31) observed for glucose monitoring. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure resident clothing was transported in a manner to ensure cleanliness and protect from dust and soil during transport. This had the potential to impact all residents residing on the 3rd floor and who the facility provides laundry services for. Findings include: R31's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R1 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of diabetes. R31's provider order dated 12/17/24, indicated R31 required a blood glucose check on Sun, Tue, Thu, Sat, at 5:00 p.m. R38's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R38 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of cellulitis (skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for 2 of 4 residents (R11, R277) reviewed for dignity. Findings include: R11's Optional State Assessment (OSA) dated 1/6/25, indicated intact cognition, and did not have behaviors or reject care. R11's face sheet form in the electronic medical record indicated R11's given name, name A, along with quotations around another name, name B. R11's care plan was reviewed and lacked information R11 had a preferred name. R11's care sheet dated 1/13/25 at 9:08 a.m., included R11's given name A. Name B was listed in quotations. R11's physician progress notes dated 1/7/25, indicated R11 wanted to be called by name B. During interview and observation on 1/13/25 between 9:28 a.m., and 9:48 a.m., R11 had signage on her door that indicated R11's given name A. Name B was listed in quotations. R11 stated the staff were calling her name A and not her preferred name, which was name B. R11 stated it got tiring having to tell them the same thing. During interview on 1/15/25 at 11:35 a.m., nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's ability to self-administration of medications (SAM) was assessed prior to leaving medications with the resident for 3 of 3 residents (R10, R278, R59) reviewed who had medications in their rooms. Findings include: R10's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified diagnoses of Parkinsonism (neurological condition which makes body movements difficult), mild cognitive impairment, personality disorder, bipolar disorder, depression, and arthritis. High risk medications included antidepressant, antipsychotic, anticoagulant, antibiotic, hypoglycemic and anticonvulsant medications. R10 required supervision with eating meals. R10's Cognition Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 10/22/24, was triggered and identified staff were to monitor for changes in cognition and assist with decisions. R10's Care Plan dated 10/22/24, identified she was a vulnerable adult and needed assistance to remain safe within the community.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure timely assistance with toileting for 2 of 2 (R50, R127) residents. Findings include: R50 R50's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition and diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following other cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side, chronic pain, muscle weakness, reduced mobility, and a need for assistance with personal care. It further indicated R50 required substantial assistance with toileting was dependent on staff with mobility, and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. R50's care plan dated 11/25/24, indicated R50 experienced bladder and bowel incontinence due to diagnoses of cerebral vascular accident, dysphagia, hemiplegia/hemiparesis, seizures, hypertension, atrial fibrillation and history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). It further indicated the following interventions: -check and change brief 2-3 times per shift and as needed. -keep call light in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and document review, the facility failed to ensure symptoms of loose stools was acted upon and assessed to determine what, if any interventions were needed to promote appropriate bowel management. Findings include: R11's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, did not have behaviors, and did not reject cares. Further, R11 required substantial to maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, and transfers, did not have a catheter or ostomy, was frequently incontinent of urine and bowel and a toileting program trial had not been attempted. Additionally, R11 had diagnoses of noninfective gastroenteritis and colitis, nausea and vomiting, The MDS indicated R11 was at risk for developing pressure ulcers and application of ointments and medications were completed other than to feet. R11's Facesheet form undated, indicated the following diagnoses: noninfective gastroenteritis and colitis, diarrhea, and other sites of candidiasis (a fungal infection) to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to implement interventions necessary to maintain continence for 1 of 1 resident (R72) reviewed for bowel and bladder. Findings include: R72's Facesheet form identified the following diagnoses: brachial plexus disorders carpal tunnel (a small passageway in the wrist that contains the median nerve and tendons that control the thumb and fingers), encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the nervous system carpal tunnel release (a surgical procedure where a ligament is cut to relieve pressure on the median nerve), sepsis (a condition where the body responds improperly to an infection), severe sepsis without septic shock, malignant neoplasm of the prostate, autistic disorder ( a condition related to brain development that impacts how a person perceives and socializes with others), rhabdomyolysis (a condition where muscle cells break down and release their contents into the bloodstream), legal blindness, wrist drop (paralysis of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure pain medications were administered timely in accordance with physician's orders and care plan for 1 of 1 residents (R25) reviewed for pain management. Findings Include: R25's minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R25 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of 15, showing intact cognition. R25 had a diagnosis of hypertension, diabetes, arthritis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). R25 receives both scheduled and as needed pain medication related diagnosis of chronic pain syndrome and non-displaced oblique fracture of the shaft of the right fibula. R25's care area assessment (CAA) dated 1/15/25 at 12:16 p.m., indicated pain made it hard for R25 to sleep at night, day-to-day activities were limited because of pain, pain was described as moderate to very severe and occurred frequently or almost constantly daily. R25's care plan dated 11/29/24, indicated scheduled pain medications to be administered per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to assess trauma history and identify potential triggers for 1 of 1 resident (R54) who had a diagnosis of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Findings include: R54's quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and diagnoses of anxiety, depression, mild cognitive impairment and PTSD. Daily medications included an antispychotic. R54's annual Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 6/20/24, triggered for psychosocial needs; indicating little interest or pleasure in doing things on the PHQ-9 (depression screen). R54 was seen by a therapist and care plan was established to minimize risks. R54's Behavioral Symptoms Care Plan dated 12/30/24, lacked identification of potential triggers related to PTSD. R54's LTC (long term care) Social services assessments dated 3/22/24, 6/19/24, 9/17/24 and 12/16/24 lacked assessment of PTSD and triggers. R54's Associated Clinic of Psychiatry notes dated 11/21/24, 10/24/24, 9/19/24 8/16/24, 7/11/24, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure call lights were accessible for 1 of 1 resident (R9) reviewed. Findings include: R9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition and diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, repeated falls, chronic pain, unspecified displaced fracture of sixth cervical vertebra, need for assistance with personal care, dependence on wheelchair, and history of a traumatic brain injury (TBI). It further indicated R9 had an impairment on one side of his upper and lower extremites and required substantial/maximal assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL) and mobility except eating and oral hygiene. R9's care plan last reviewed on 12/16/2024, indicated R9 was at risk for falls due to Basal Ganglia stroke resulting in left hemiparesis, history of TBI, subdural hematoma, and mild degenerative retrolisthesis of C3- C4, with an intervention of call light…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify family and physician regarding a resident change in condition for one of one resident (R1) reviewed when R1's venous ulcer wound worsened requiring hospitalization. Findings include: R1's medical record indicated R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of venous insufficiency. R1's additional diagnoses included non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of right lower leg with fat layer exposed on right shin, methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere- wound culture, pseudomonas (aeruginosa) (mallei) (pseudomallei) as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere-wound culture, chronic kidney disease stage 3, pressure ulcer of right heel (unstageable), pressure ulcer of sacral region (unspecified stage), morbid obesity due to excess calories, non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of right foot with unspecified severity on right toe, non-pressure chronic ulcer of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to reduce the risk of harm for one of one resident (R2) reviewed accidents and hazards. R2 required the use of an EZ Stand and facility staff were using a large sized harness. The EZ Stand manufacturer guidelines state a large harness fit a person between one hundred ninety pounds to three hundred twenty pounds. R2 exceeded the weight limit. Findings include: The facility provided the EZ Way Smart Stand operator's instructions that stated a large sling was to be used on a resident between forty to fifty-six inches in circumference around the resident's torso and weighed between one hundred ninety to three hundred twenty pounds. During an observation on 8/26/24 at 9:20 a.m., there was a EZ Stand outside R2's door with a large harness on the back of it. The EZ Stand stated it had a four-hundred-pound capacity. During an observation on 8/26/24 at 9:34 a.m., the occupational therapy assistant (OTA) was getting R2 up from her wheelchair for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an EZ Stand was maintained in accordance with manufacturer guidelines for one of one resident (R2) reviewed for EZ Stands. It is unknown when R2's EZ Stand was last maintained due to no record of it being maintained. Findings include: The facility provided an operator's instructions for EZ Stand with the serial number 907725. The operator's instructions states the manufacturer suggests that components and operating points be scheduled for inspection at intervals not greater than six months. R2's medical records indicated R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. R2's additional dizziness and daffiness, morbid obesity, and muscle weakness. During an observation on 8/26/24 at 9:20 a.m., there is a EZ Stand outside R2's room that had a sticker stating the next maintenance check was due in May 2024. The EZ Stand is called an EZ Way Smart Stand. The EZ Stand's serial number was 907725. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and home like environment for 10 of 25 residents (R12, R13, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11) reviewed and all independently mobile residents on the 3rd floor when concerns related to resident bathrooms and flooring, cleaning practices and cleaning product storage were observed. Findings include: R4's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition. R5's annual MDS dated [DATE], identified moderately impaired cognition. R6's annual MDS dated [DATE], identified moderately impaired cognition. R7's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition. R8's annual MDS dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition. R9's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition. R10's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition. R11's annual MDS dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition. R12's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately assess 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed upon admission to the facility. R1 was admitted with two pressure ulcers, a deep tissue injury and a shearing wound that the facility did not assess or create inventions for during his stay at the facility. R1's hospital discharge orders dated 6/25/24 indicated R1 had: -A Stage 3 (an injury that extends through the skin into deeper skin and fat but does not reach muscle tendon or bone) pressure ulcer on the dorsum (upper surface) of his second right toe. R1 had this pressure injury since 1/6/23. -A dermatologic condition of his right foot since 1/6/23 -Incision on the anterior portion of his right knee since 6/20/24 -A Stage 4 (an injury that extends to the muscle, tendon, and bone) pressure injury on the dorsum of his third right toe since 6/21/24. -A dermatologic condition of generalized rash and pruritis since 6/21/24 -A Shearing wound to his buttocks bilaterally from friction and adhesive from sacral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to serve food at a palatable temperature to 4 of 4 residents (R4, R9, R11, R10) reviewed for dietary and nutrition. Findings include: On 5/21/24 at 12:57 p.m., during an interview social worker (SW)-B stated residents expressed the food was cold, and it remained a, Prevalent concern. On 5/21/24 at 1:30 p.m., during an interview SW-C stated, Cold food is a big complaint, and had been for years. R4's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R4 was cognitively intact. On 5/21/24 at 4:56 p.m., during an interview R4 stated the hot food was usually served cold. On 5/22/24 at 8:50 a.m., during an observation and interview the director of culinary services (DCS) performed temperature checks on R9's food prior to staff serving the food to R9. The meal came in a hot box (cart designed to hold food trays at an appropriate temperature before service) from the building next door, and sat on a cart to be distributed to the resident rooms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a clean, safe and home-like environment for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R4, R11) reviewed for a clean environment on the 4th floor and [NAME] end. Findings include: R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 was cognitively intact and admitted on 4/2024. R1's progress note dated 4/16/24, indicated R1 wanted to move to another facility due to housekeeping and other concerns. On 5/21/24 at 12:38 p.m., during an interview family member (FM)-A stated R1 was concerned the facility was not clean and didn't have sufficient staff to clean. On 5/21/24 at 12:57 p.m., during an interview social worker (SW)-B stated R1 expressed general concerns to her about cleanliness of her room and said her room was dirty. On 5/21/24 at 1:30 p.m., during an interview SW-C stated R1 complained about a dirty tray table and had other isolated complaints about facility cleanliness, and facility maintenance. On 5/21/24 at 4:14 p.m., during an observation the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and document review the facility failed to ensure baths were given as ordered for 2 of 3 residents (R4, R10) who needed assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings include: R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R4 was cognitively intact, and was fully dependent upon staff to bathe. R4's care plan dated 4/17/24, indicated a self-care deficit for bathing, assistance of one staff for weekly bath dated 10/17/23, and offer a second shower weekly dated 10/17/23. R4's physician orders dated 2/5/24 indicated R4 was to bathe twice weekly on Thursday and Sunday. R4's Point of Care (POC) nursing assistant (NA) bath documentation in the electronic health record (EHR) indicated from 4/1/24 to 5/22/24, R4 missed baths on 4/7/24, 4/18/24, 5/2/24, 5/5/24, 5/16/24, and 5/19/24. R4's record did not identify the reason why these baths were missed. The POC documentation further identified R4 required maximum assistance of staff to bathe. On 5/21/24 at 4:56…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure medications were appropriately transcribed into the electronic health record (EHR), ordered timely and correct medication dosages were administered in accordance with physician orders for 1 of 1 residents (R3), reviewed for missed medication errors. Findings include: R3's face sheet printed 5/22/24, indicated R3 admitted to the facility with diagnoses of enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile, cirrhosis of the liver, acute gastric ulcer with hemorrhage, ascites, and reflux disease. R3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], was not complete as R3 was in the facility less than 24 hours. R3's medication orders dated 5/2/23, were as follows: -cholestyramine-aspartame powder in packet (medication to lower cholesterol), 4 grams by mouth with meals twice daily at 8:00 a.m., and 4:00 p.m. (start date 5/2/24). -pantoprazole tablet delayed release (medication for gatroesophageal reflux (heart burn)) 40 milligrams (mg) twice daily by mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 kitchenettes were cleaned,including the cleaning of the kitchenette refrigerators and also failed to monitor refrigerator temperatures daily to maintain food safety. This had the potential to affect all residents who resided at the facility. Findings Include: During observation and record review on 11/30/23 at 9:34 a.m., the second-floor kitchenette countertop was noted with debris and dust buildup. The refrigerator freezer had spilled brownish matter frozen to the bottom lining of the freezer. The refrigerator had brown buildup and dark brownish stains in the refrigerator shelving and door compartments. During record review, the refrigerator temp log on the door of the refrigerator was dated 5/23 and was missing several days of documented temperature checks for May 2023. Only the following temperatures were documented: -5/2/23-temperature was recorded as 36 degrees Celsius -5/8/23-temperature was recorded as 36 degrees Celsius -5/16/23-temperature was recorded as 36 degrees Celsius…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure catheter drainage bags were properly cleaned and stored in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (R38) reviewed for catheters. Findings include: The Center for Disease Control (CDC) Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTI) guideline dated 11/5/2015, identified after aseptic insertion of the urinary catheter, a closed drainage system should be maintained. If the aseptic technique was broken, disconnected, or if leakage occurred, the catheter and collecting system should be replaced with aseptic technique and sterile equipment used. R38's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified moderately impaired cognition and diagnoses of chronic kidney disease and urinary retention. R38 had an indwelling catheter and required extensive assist with toileting. R38's Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 9/11/23, identified the CAA triggered due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to monitor a resident (R59) with involuntary muscle movements who was taking antipsychotic medications. R59's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated moderately impaired cognition and diagnoses of alzheimer's disease (early onset), dementia with other behavioral disturbance and adjustment disorder with anxiety. It further indicated R59 required total dependence with transfers, required extensive assistance with all other activities of daily living (ADL), and received an antipsychotic 7 out of 7 days in the look back period. R59's physician's orders dated 11/03/22, indicated quetiapine tablet 50 milligrams by mouth, three times a day (8:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m., 7:00 p.m.) for agitation. R59's care plan dated 9/29/22 indicated R59 received a psychotropic medication with interventions to administer medication per medical doctors order, monitor for target behaviors daily, monthly medication record review by pharmacist, and observe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-08-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow resident meal tickets , provide palatable meals, and provide meals to meet the needs of the residents for four of four residents (R2, R4, R5, R6) reviewed for meals and food . R2 requested a butterscotch square and French bread for lunch but received chocolate cake and no bread. R4, R5, and R6 were not able to finish their lunch due to the food either being too dry or could not eat the lunch due to not having teeth. Findings include: During an observation on 8/26/24 at 12:08 p.m., R4 had a hard time cutting up his pork chop. R4 was putting pressure on his fork and knife while attempting to cut his pork chop. During an observation on 8/26/24 at 12:20 p.m., R4 wheeled out of the dining room in his wheelchair. On his plate was a pork chop and some carrots. During an observation on 8/26/24 at 12:09 p.m., R5 had a hard time cutting up her pork chop. R5 was putting pressure on her fork and knife while attempting to cut her pork chop.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$69,031 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $51,948 — penalty dated 2025-05-15
  • $17,083 — penalty dated 2024-12-05
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-08 for 4 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FAIRVIEW BETHESDA HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 07/01/2005
ROBINSON, FRANKIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/09/2021
CARLEY, GERALDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/02/2018
FOUSSARD, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/24/2010
GRZYWINSKI, JOANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/13/2014
KSEPKA, DAWNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/13/2013
LUNDBERG, JONATHANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/01/2018
BERGIEN, TRICIAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/16/2016
BRUHN, JENNIFERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/25/2019
RYMANOWSKI, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2005
BENEDICTINE HEALTH SYSTEMOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2005

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$976K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 5%Other / private 28%

This home reported $976K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$448per resident / day
operating cost
$13,616per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$413per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Minnesota
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,870/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,573/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245255. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next