No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Episcopal Church Home The Gardens

1860 University Avenue West, Saint Paul, MN 55104 · Non profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (651) 632-8801 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (651) 632-8801 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited May 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1690 University Ave W · (800) 881-5101 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
800 Transfer Rd Ste 29 · (651) 917-4029 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1818 Minnehaha Ave W · (651) 644-1233 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1884 University Ave W · (651) 266-6400 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1955 University Ave W · (651) 917-1090

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased32.2%18.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.5%4.1%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.3%1.9%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.8%2.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.5%4.1%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.1%4.0%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened33.2%20.5%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication6.5%12.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.5%5.2%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control32.7%24.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.1%17.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.0%82.7%79.4%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.57
RN hours/ resident / day
0.93
LPN hours/ resident / day
4.19
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.69
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.54
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 54.4 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.19 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.30 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.85 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-09)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement individualized fall interventions for 2 of 3 residents (R27, R35) and failed to ensure a route cause analysis was completed and new interventions were implemented following a fall for 1 of 1 resident (R6), who was at risk for and had a history of falls. This resulted in harm when R6 had a subsequent fall on 5/16/23 and sustained a lumbar fracture. Findings include: R6's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition and diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF), unspecified fall, abnormalities of gait and mobility, low back pain, and history of falling. It further indicated R6 was independent with all activities of daily living (ADL), occasionally incontinent of bladder, frequently incontinent of bowel, had a previous fall history prior to admission, and had received an antidepressant 7/7 and a diuretic 6/7 days in the look back period. R6's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 5/4/23, indicated R6 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure foods were stored in a manner to prevent spoilage and freezer burn and failed to ensure food items in 6 out of 6 kitchenettes were sealed, labeled and dated. This had the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility. Findings include:An observation on 4/7/26 at 3:22 p.m., the 2nd floor kitchenette was reviewed. The freezer had undated, opened packages of bacon, pancakes, waffles, hot dog buns and a container of red and white substance. Nursing assistant (NA)-H verified these items and stated all items should have been sealed, dated and labeled.An observation on 4/8/26 at 8:16 a.m., the 3rd floor kitchenette was reviewed. The freezer had undated, opened packages of french toast, waffles, pepperoni, english muffins, omelets and bacon. NA-G verified these items and stated all items should have been sealed, dated and labeled.An observation on 4/7/26 at 2:29 p.m., the 4th floor kitchenette was reviewed. The freezer had undated, opened packages of omelets, pancakes, french toast, corn dogs,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure appropriate glove use and hand hygiene for 1 of 1 resident (R19) during personal cares. The facility further failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 1 of 1 resident (R19) who had a nephrostomy tube and for 1 of 1 resident (R4) who had a catheter and was receiving catheter cares. The facility also failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (R54) on droplet precautions was wearing a mask when out of her room. This had the potential to affect all 10 residents residing on the 3rd floor. Findings include: Hand Hygiene/Glove Use R19's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R19 had intact cognition, was dependent on staff for toileting and personal hygiene, and was always incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel. R19's diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, anxiety, and need for assistance with personal care. R19's care plan revised 4/6/26, indicated R19 required assistance of one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were safe for self-administration of medication (SAM) for 1 of 1 residents (R36) observed with a medication at the bedside. Findings include:R36's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R36 had intact cognition and required set up/clean up assistance to partial/moderate assistance for all self-care activities of daily living (ADLs). R36's diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (a disease affecting the nervous system and may cause weakness, numbness, and difficulty walking), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), arthritis, and need for assistance with personal care. R36's care plan revised 12/8/25, indicated R36 had inability to manage self-care related to functional and cognitive decline. R36's care plan further indicated R36 had multiple sclerosis which affected ADL independence. The care plan identified R36 wanted to be involved in her care and medications, but instructed staff to administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure personal privacy was maintained for 1 of 1 residents (R19) observed during personal cares.Findings include:R19's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R19 had intact cognition, was dependent on staff for toileting and personal hygiene, and was always incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel. R19's diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, anxiety, and need for assistance with personal care. R19's care plan revised 4/6/26, indicated R19 required assistance of one for personal hygiene and substantial to total assistance for toileting. During observation on 4/7/26 at 10:05 a.m., nursing assistant (NA)-A entered R19's room and offered a brief change. R19 stated that she did need to be changed and cleaned. NA-A donned gloves and put the head of the bed flat, lifted R19's gown and removed her brief. NA-A did not close R19's door, which was open to the hallway. NA-A walked into the bathroom to obtain a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was administered and maintained as ordered by the provider for 1 of 2 residents (R15) reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include:R15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R15 was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff for most self-care activities of daily living (ADLs), bed mobility and transfers. R15's diagnoses include chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety, and dyspnea (shortness of breath). R15's provider orders dated 7/29/25, included the following:-Oxygen via nasal cannula at 4 liters per minute (lpm) continuous for dyspnea. -Change cannula/mask and tubing, date and initial weekly every Tuesday evening.R15's shortness of breath interview and evaluation assessment dated [DATE], indicated R15 was oxygen dependent.R15's care plan dated 8/6/25, indicated R15 had orders for oxygen therapy related to diagnoses and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed timely for 1 of 5 residents (R10) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include:R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R10 had moderate cognitive impairment, was frequently incontinent of bowel, and was taking opioid medications during the seven-day lookback period. R10's diagnoses included adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, chronic pain syndrome, and constipation. R10's care plan dated [DATE], indicated R10 used antidepressant medication and instructed staff to monitor adverse medication reactions such as constipation fecal impaction (when stool becomes hardened and stuck in the rectum due to long term constipation. The care plan further indicated R10 had chronic pain syndrome and instructed staff to give pain medications as ordered. R10's consultant pharmacy review (CPR) dated [DATE], indicated, The resident has orders for MiraLAX PRN [as needed]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and document review, the facility failed to follow professional standards when a staff crushed delayed release medications and crushed pill capsules with other medications instead of opening and emptying the pill capsules for 1 of 3 (R2) residents reviewed for medication administration.Findings include: R2's face sheet dated 10/16/25 indicated R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses of severe vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, aphasia, dysphagia, epilepsy, chronic kidney disease stage 1 through 4 and depression.R2's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R2 was severely cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living.R2's October 2025 medication administration record (MAR) included physician orders for-Aspirin Enteric Coated Low Dose Oral Tablet Delayed Release 81 milligrams (aspirin). Give 81…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed had a dignified existence when the three residents had been told to use an incontinent brief to toilet rather than staff assisting them to the bathroom.Findings include: Upon observation and interview on 8/14/25 at 8:40 a.m. R1 was struggling to find her call light as it was wrapped around her bed rail and hanging to a floor. A voice from her camera saw the surveyor and asked to assist R1 as she needed to use the bathroom. A nursing assistant could not be found in the hallway, so licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A was asked to come into the room at 8:44 a.m. LPN-A placed her call light within her reach. At 8:45 a.m. R1 pushed her call light. At 8:47 a.m. nursing assistant (NA)-B entered the room, turned off the light and told R1 she would return. At 9:07 NA-B returned with another NA and started morning cares on R1. R1 stated it was common practice for the nursing assistances to turn off her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to reduce the risk of accidents for residents 2 of 3 (R1 and R2) reviewed for supervision. The facility did not assess and document the aimed use for the intent of alarms to be used temporarily to assess patterns and routines of the residents. R1 and R2's family requested the alarms following multiple falls and concerns about adequate supervision.Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R1's Brief Inventory of Mental Status was a 13 indicating R1 was cognitively intact. R1 was dependent upon staff for dressing, bathing, toileting, and hygiene cares. She was dependent upon staff for all transferring in and out of bed. R1's pertinent diagnoses were cerebral vascular disease (a group of conditions that affect blood flow and blood vessels in the brain), hypothyroidism (the thyroid gland doe does not produce enough thyroid hormone, chronic kidney disease, pain, and unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to attempt alternative devices before using bedrails on residents beds. The failed to accurately assess the residents for risk of entrapment by assessing residents medical diagnosis, size and weight, cognition, communication, and mobility for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed for bed rails. In addition, R2 had side rails used in conjunction with an air mattress. Findings include: Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual retrieved from https://www.cms.gov/files/document/finalmds-30-rai-manual-v11811october2023.pdf indicated a physical restraint or method physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the residents body that the individual cannot remove easily, which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. Residents who are cognitively impaired are at a higher risk of entrapment and injury or death caused by physical restraints. It is vital that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a system to reduce the risk of significant medication errors for transdermal opioid patches for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for medication administration. R1 was ordered by her hospice agency to have a transdermal opioid patch (narcotic medicated patch that slowly releases the medication into the body) placed on her skin every seven days. On two occasions the nursing staff failed to remove the old patch from her skin when the new patch was placed on her.Findings include: R1's hospice care plan dated 5/28/25 indicated buprenorphine (Butrans) 5 micrograms per hour (mcg/hr.) patch (an opioid patch used to treat opioid use disorder but also used for pain management) was to be applied once every week. Remove old patch prior to new patch application for chronic pain. R1's facility providers order dated 5/29/25 indicated Butrans transdermal patch 5 mcg/hr. Apply 1 patch transdermal one time a day every seven days for pain. The facility's order did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to establish a communication process between the facility and the hospice provider to ensure that the needs of a resident were addressed and met for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for hospice services. R1 did not receive the necessary care and services when she had the same medication error occur twice. In addition, the facility failed to have a designated member of the interdisciplinary team who was responsible to work with hospice to ensure residents receiving hospice services needs were met.Findings include: R1's hospice care plan dated 5/28/25 indicated buprenorphine (Butrans) 5 micrograms per hour (mcg/hr.) patch (an opioid patch used to treat opioid use disorder but also used for pain management) was to be applied once every week. Remove old patch prior to new patch application for chronic pain. R1's facility providers order dated 5/29/25 indicated Butrans transdermal patch 5 mcg/hr. Apply 1 patch transdermal (on the skin) one time a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to conduct regular inspections of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails as a part of the regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed. The bed manufacturer guidelines indicated to visually inspect the bed and accessories monthly and indicated to follow the FDA guidance.Findings include: Recommendations for Health Care Providers Using Adult Portable Bed rails dated 2/27/2023 retrieved on 8/14/25 from https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/general-hospital-devices-and-supplies/hospital-beds indicated, when evaluating the safe use of a hospital bed, component or accessory, manufacturers and caregivers should recognize that the risk for entrapment may increase if a hospital bed system is used for purposes, or used in a care setting, not intended by the manufacturer. Evaluating the dimensional limits of gaps in hospital beds may be one component of a bed safety program which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported immediately to the state agency and administrator of the facility, but not later than two hours after the allegation is made for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse. R1 reported to multiple staff members the care she received was rough causing pain, staff yelled at her, and a staff member heard another staff member yelling at R1. Findings include: The facilities grievance log dated 1/1/25 - 5/16/25 did not indicate any grievances about R1. R1's re-admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R1's Brief Inventory of Mental Status (BIMS) score indicated a 99 meaning unable to complete. R1 was dependent upon staff for toileting hygiene, bathing, lower body dressing, and moving from a lying to a sitting position on the side of her bed. R1's pertinent diagnoses were hypovolemia (deficiency of volume of blood in the body), cirrhosis of the liver (scar tissue in the liver), unspecified dementia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to revise the care plan for 1 of 3 residents (R2) who were reviewed for falls. Findings include: R2's face sheet dated 3/27/25, identified diagnosis of Parkinson's disease, dementia, and kidney disease. R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified moderate cognitive impairment, maximum assistance for bed mobility, dependent for transfers, and two or more falls since admission without injury. R2's fall focus care plan dated 11/13/24, identified at risk for falls. Goal of will not sustain serious injury. Interventions added as followed: -11/13/24 to place call light within reach and encourage to use it -12/11/24 ensure R2's phone is close to her bed where can be easily reached. -12/23/24 R2 sometimes wakes up confused and agitated, she will scream and attempt to get out of bed on her own, staff to provided reassurance and redirection until calmed. -12/26/24 R2 sometimes wakes up confused and attempts to climb out of bed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess and monitor a skin tear (a traumatic wound that occurs when the top layer of skin separates from the underlying layers) for 1 of 1 resident (R3) reviewed for injury of unknown origin. Findings include: R3's face sheet dated 3/26/25, identified diagnoses of heart failure (condition in which heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a common, preventable and treatable disease that is characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms like progressive breathlessness and cough), and peripheral vascular disease (a condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs). R3's care plan dated 1/22/25, identified R3 had actual impairment to skin integrity related to a healing skin tear on right upper arm. No other areas of skin impairment were identified. R3's admission nursing assessment dated [DATE], identified skin tear on right forearm measuring 3.2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have a process in place to monitor refrigerator, dishwasher and breakfast food temperatures in all six unit kitchens in the care facility. In addition the facility failed to ensure opened food and beverage containers were dated to prevent unsafe consumption by residents. This had the ability to affect all 55 residents residing in the care facility. Findings include: During interview and observation on 9/9/24 at 11:45 a.m., the registered dietician (RD) stated there was one central kitchen where lunch and dinner were cooked, and each resident floor (two through seven) had their own full kitchen. Breakfast was cooked to order for each resident on the floors and lunch and dinner were kept warm in a steamer on the floors. Each floor had an industrial refrigerator, one unit residential type refrigerator and a high temperature dishwasher. During observation the second-floor kitchen lacked any temperature logs for the industrial and unit refrigerators and the dishwasher. The industrial refrigerator was showing two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to the facility failed to ensure proper use of gloves while providing personal cares for 1 of 1 resident (R35) observed for personal cares. In addition, the facility failed to sanitize a standing lift sling shared by residents for 2 of 2 residents (R35 and R9) observed for infection control practices. Findings include: Hand Hygiene R35's quarterly Minimum Assessment Data (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R35 had moderate cognitive impairment, needed setup to eat, supervision with oral hygiene, and was dependent with bathing, toileting, dressing, bed mobility and transfers. R35's clinical diagnoses record printed 9/12/24, indicated diagnoses of epileptic syndrome (a unique combination of symptoms or by the location in the brain where the seizures originate), malignant neoplasm of the frontal lobe (brain cancer), essential hypertension(abnormally high blood pressure that's not the result of a medical condition), pain, unspecified dementia, type…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0659 — isolated
    Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure unqualified staff did not administer as needed (PRN) medication used for skin rash for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for qualified staffing. Findings include, R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 was cognitively intact, and had diagnoses of coronary artery disease (damage or disease in the heart's major blood vessels), peripheral vascular disease (circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs) , hypertension (high blood pressure), and diabetes. R1's Clinical Diagnoses record printed 9/12/24, indicated diagnoses of local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue (under the skin), and irritant contact dermatitis (a skin rash caused by contact with a certain substance) due to fecal and urinary incontinence. R1's Clinical Orders record printed 9/12/24, included an order for Nystatin powder (used to treat fungal or yeast infections) 100,000 unit/gm (gram) topical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure assistance with personal hygiene for 2 of 2 residents (R6, R44 ) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) for dependent residents. Findings include: R6 R6's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severe impairment of cognition, diagnoses of Alzheimer's and heart failure, and R6 required extensive assistance with ADL's. In addition, R6 did not display rejection of cares. R6's Care Area Assessment (CAA) identified triggers for delirium, cognitive loss/dementia, functional abilities, psychosocial well-being, mood state, and psychotropic drug use (medications used to treat mental health disorders). R6's care plan (CP) dated 8/2/22, and revised 8/21/23 identified, PERSONAL HYGIENE/ORAL CARE: I require limited to extensive assist of 1 staff for personal hygiene and oral care. R6's nursing assistant (NAR) task form in the electronic medical record (EMR) for dates of 8/12/24 to 9/9/24 identified, PERSONAL HYGIENE:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to assess and implement interventions to assist a resident, who was unable to maintain positioning for 1 of 1 resident (R40) reviewed for positioning. Findings include: R40's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated R40 was admitted to the care facility on 4/4/22, had severe cognitive impairment, and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS further indicated R40 had 2 or more falls with injury since the last assessment. R40's Diagnoses list, printed 9/12/24, indicated R40 had several medical diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease, vascular dementia, and legal blindness. R40's care plan, printed on 9/12/24 lacked interventions to address R40's positioning. During observation on 9/9/24 at 1:21 p.m., R40 was in the common area in a black, high back wheelchair. R40 was leaning over at her waist to the right with her right arm hanging over the side of the wheelchair arm. An unnamed nurse approached R40 to ask if she needed toileting, R40 stated no. The unnamed nurse did not attempt to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to implement, and care plan, new and appropriate fall interventions to prevent falls for 2 of 2 residents (R40 and R51) reviewed for falls. Findings include: R40 R40's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R40 was admitted to the care facility on 4/4/22, had severe cognitive impairment, and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS further indicated R40 had 2 or more falls with injury since the last assessment. R40's Diagnoses list, printed 9/12/24, indicated R40 had several medical diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease, vascular dementia and legal blindness. R40's past two fall assessments, dated 4/27/24 and 7/27/24, indicated R40 has at risk for falls. R40's care plan, dated 4/5/22 and revised on 8/2/24, indicated R40 had behaviors where I try to stand up, wander and occasionally grab at staff during cares. However, the care plan problem lacked any new interventions since 4/5/22. R40's care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to monitor orthostatic blood pressures during the use of an antipsychotic medication (used to manage delusions, hallucinations, paranoia, or disordered thought) for 1 of 5 residents (R51) reviewed for antipsychotic medications. Findings include: R51: R51's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified admission to facility on 7/26/23, intact cognition, independence with ambulation, standing and transfers and was taking antipsychotics (medications prescribed for mood disorders). R51's Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 7/22/24, identified care plan triggers for delirium, cognitive loss/dementia, communication, functioning abilities, psychosocial well-being, mood state, behavioral symptoms, falls, and psychotropic drug use. R51's Medical Diagnoses downloaded from electronic medical record (EMR) on 9/10/24, identified R51 with dementia (group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities), bipolar (mental health condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure mediations were safely and securely stored for 1 of 1 resident (R38) reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: R38's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R38 had moderate cognitive impairment, was dependent with dressing, toileting, bathing, transfers, but ate independently. The MDS indicated the following diagnoses, peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), diabetes (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood), anxiety, depression, and hyperlipidemia (a condition in which there are high levels of fat particles in the blood). R38's care plan printed 9/12/24, indicated R38 was unable to ambulate, transferred with assist of staff and a standing lift, and used a manual wheelchair with brake extenders. The care plan also indicated R38 had poor safety awareness, and impaired cognitive function related to mild cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a care plan for one of one resident (R3) reviewed for care plans when interventions were not put into the care plan following a care conference that led to a fall. Findings include: R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of dementia. Additional diagnoses included osteoarthritis, abnormalities of gait and mobility, pain, muscle weakness, morbid obesity, difficulty walking, reduced mobility, Alzheimer's Disease, fecal urgency, urinary incontinence, and incontinence of feces. R3's care plan dated [DATE] indicated R3 was at high risk for falls related to cognitive impairment, difficulty remembering to use walker, and incontinence. Interventions placed included making sure the call light is within reach, encourage the use of her call light for assistance, and evaluate and treat pain as needed. R3's Fall Risk Evaluation dated [DATE] indicated R3 had a history of falls. The evaluation indicated R3's predisposing fall risks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was utilized to prevent the spread of infection when rinsing contaminated laundry. Furthermore, the facility failed to transport clean laundry in a manner which ensured protection from dust and soil. This had the potential to impact all 60 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: R51's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R51 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of heart disease and diabetes. R10's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R10 had cognitive impairment and diagnosis of dementia. An observation on 7/31/23 at 9:03 a.m., a white laundry basket was on the floor outside of R51's room. The laundry basket contained two small piles of clean folded clothes and the clothes were not covered. R51 stated that's a job for me to do later and indicated his clean clothes needed to be put away. An observation on 8/1/23 at 9:03 a.m., a white laundry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a self-administration of medication assessment (SAM) was completed to allow residents to safely administer their own medications for 1 of 1 resident (R14) observed with medications at bedside. Findings inclued: R14's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R14 had intact cognition and diagnoses of mild intermittent asthma, heart disease , and chronic kidney disease. It further indicated R6 required extensive assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL) except walking in room/corridor in which she required limited assistance. R14's medical record lacked a doctor's order to be able to self administer her medication. R14's Self Administration of Medications assessment dated [DATE], indicated R14 had no desire to self administer medications. During observation and interview on [DATE] at 12:09 p.m., R14 was sitting in her recliner with her bedside table next to her. On the bedside table she had 2 albuterol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary equipment for 1 of 1 residents (R45) reviewed for environmental cleanliness. Findings include: R45's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R45 had severe cognitive impairment and diagnosis of stroke. R45's MDS further indicated R45 had a mechanically altered diet and required tube feedings. An observation on 7/31/23 at 7:09 a.m., R45 was in bed. Next to R45's bed was a pole with a pump that was used to administer R45's tube feeding. On the bottom feet of the pole were small and large drops of a tan/brown dry substance. In between the feet of the pole the same substance was on the carpet. An observation on 8/1/23 at 4:11 p.m., R45 was sitting in her wheelchair. R45's tube feeding pole was up towards the head of the bed. The same tan/brown dry substance was on the feet of the pole. When interviewed on 8/2/23 at 7:49 a.m., housekeeper (HSK)-A was not sure if equipment was cleaned by the housekeeping…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to report a fall with major injury for 2 of 5 residents (R6, R27) reviewed for accidents. Findings include: R6's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition and diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF), unspecified fall, abnormalities of gait and mobility, low back pain, and history of falling. It further indicated R6 was independent with all activities of daily living (ADL), occasionally incontinent of bladder, frequently incontinent of bowel, had a previous fall history prior to admission, and had received an antidepressant 7/7 and a diurectic 6/7 days in the look back period. R6's Care Plan dated 4/28/23, included R6 was at high risk for falls related to a history of impaired mobility, diabetes, dementia, CHF, a history of falls, and a recent fall on 5/16/23. It further included interventions to anticipate and meet the resident's needs, ensure his call light was within reach and encourage him to use it for assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain a walking program for 1 of 1 residents (R25) reviewed for restorative rehabilitation. Findings include: R25's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R25 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of stroke and dementia. R25's MDS further indicated R25 required assist of one for walking. R25's assistance of daily living (ADL) care area assessment (CAA) dated 7/12/23, indicated R25 was unsteady with transitions, required staff assistance to stabilize, and required limited assistance with transfers and ambulation. R25's care plan revised 5/20/22, indicated R25 had limited physical mobility related to a fall with fractures, weakness and history of stroke. R25's care plan further indicated R25 required assistance of 1 person, gait belt, and walker for mobility. R25's nursing assistant care sheet revised 8/2/23, indicated R25 had a restorative nursing program and required ambulation with assist of one staff, gait belt…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to monitor, assess, and ensure provider wound care orders were followed for 1 of 1 resident (R51) who had facility acquired pressure ulcers. Findings include: R51's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R51 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of peripheral vascular disease (PVD, poor blood flow to extremities), diabetes, and stage 2 pressure ulcers (a shallow wound with skin loss and pink or red base). R51's pressure injury care area assessment (CAA) dated 5/3/23, indicated R51 was at risk for worsening pressure ulcers related to limited to extensive assist with mobility, limited range of motion to left lower extremity, stage 2 pressure injury and history of diabetes, PVDs and right below the knee amputation. R51's care plan revised 6/23/23, indicated R51 had history of pressure injuries related to decreased mobility and impaired circulation. R51's care plan instructed staff to assess, measure, and record wounds…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure an antibiotic medication was properly labeled and secured for 1 of 1 residents (R38) reviewed for antibiotic use. Findings include: R38's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R38 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (disease that disrupts the nerve signals between brain and body), enlarged prostrate and urine retention. R38's provider order dated 5/17/23, indicated R38 required gentamicin (antibiotic) 200 milligrams/liter bladder irrigation on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for prophylactic urinary tract infection. When observed on 8/2/23 at 3:21 p.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)- B entered R38's room to administer R38's antibiotic medication. LPN-B entered R38's room and asked R38 if he was ready for the medication and R38 replied yes. LPN-B then retrieved a graduate cylinder with a 60 milliliter (ml) syringe containing clear liquid inside of it that was placed on top of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-26 for 22 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
EPISCOPAL HOMES ON UNIVERSITY AVENUE, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/27/2013
EPISCOPAL HOME CARE AND SERVICESOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/27/2013
EPISCOPAL HOMES OF MINNESOTAOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/27/2013
WELLS FARGO BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 05/01/2013
FRANCO, KEANANIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 10/27/2015
CUTLER, LOISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2016
FORBES, CAROLIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2016
GILBERTSON, MELISSAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2016
GOVE, PETERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2016
HAWTHORNE, REBECCAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2017
HOVE, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/27/2013
HUBER, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2017
MCGOWAN, DIANEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/27/2013
NOWLIN, SARAHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/27/2013
OSTENSO, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2015
SLAWICK, JEROMEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2016
CLEM, MARYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2017
HENRY, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/19/2015
MORK, STEVENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/12/2016
PLAKUT, MARVINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/27/2013
EH SERVICES INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/27/2013

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in MN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Minnesota
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,870/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,573/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245625. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next