Little Sisters Of The Poor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 73 beds and averages 35.6 residents a day — about 49% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.28 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.08 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to identify, comprehensively assess, implement individualized interventions for wandering, exit seeking behaviors, and elopement for 2 of 2 residents (R1, R2) who had a history of repeated exit seeking behaviors. The facility's failures resulted in immediate jeopardy (IJ) when R1 eloped from the facility, was found on a city street, and returned by a passerby. The immediate jeopardy began on 9/5/24 after R1 attempted elopement multiple times, the facility failed to complete comprehensive wandering/elopement assessments, monitoring system, and appropriate intervention resulting in R1's actual elopement on 9/21/24. The immediate jeopardy was identified on 9/26/24 and the chief executive officer and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the immediate jeopardy on 9/26/24 at 6:18 p.m. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 10/3/24 at 11:11 a.m., but noncompliance remained at the lower scope and severity level 2 (D), which indicated no actual harm with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure all required discharge documentation was provided to the resident and receiving facility; and failed to ensure transfer and discharge notices were sent to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (OOLTC) for 1 of 1 resident (R37) reviewed for discharge.Findings include: R37's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition, independent with dressing, hygiene and mobility. There was no active discharge planning in place and medications included anticoagulants and anticonvulsants.R37's care plan dated 7/24/25, identified resident desires to transfer to assisted living when opening is available. Interventions included social services will assist in finding assisted living per doctor's orders. R37's Order Recap Report dated 1/01/25 through 1/31/26, lacked an order to discharge.R37's provider visits summaries dated 9/11/25 and 11/13/25, lacked information or orders related to discharge. R37's progress note dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure routine personal hygiene care (i.e., nail care) was provided for 1 of 1 resident (R19) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs), and who was dependent on staff for her care.Findings include:R19's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R19 had moderate cognitive impairment, had no behaviors, and did not refuse personal cares. R19's MDS indicated she was independent with hygiene, bathing, transfers and used a rolling walker for mobility.R19's medical diagnosis report dated 1/28/26, indicated diagnoses of congestive heart disease, cerebral infarction (stroke) without residual deficits, dementia, back pain, and hypertension.R19's care plan dated 1/28/26, indicated R19 was independent with dressing and needed limited assistance of one staff member with personal and toileting hygiene. This care plan directed one staff member to assist R19 with dressing and applying shoes. R19's Kardex indicated she received…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure narcotic and controlled substances destruction was completed in accordance with established policies and procedures to reduce the risk of diversion and/or theft for 1 of 1 resident (R7) reviewed for fentanyl patch removal. Findings include:R7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) date 1/14/26, indicated R7 was cognitively intact, required substantial/maximal assistance with most activities of daily living (ADLs) and mobility, and experienced almost constant pain. The MDS indicated R7 was taking opioids as scheduled pain medication regimen. R7's diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (neurological disease affecting movement), respiratory failure, and chronic pain.R7's care plan dated 5/27/25, indicated R7 required pain management due to chronic pain as a result of osteoarthritis, kyphosis (condition of humpback), scoliosis (abnormal curvature of the spine), and dorsalgia (pain anywhere in the back). R7's physician orders included:-Fentanyl Transdermal Patch 72 hour 12/mcg/hr.apply 1 patch transdermal every 72 hours for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure open refrigerated items were dated and covered. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure expired items were removed from storage. This had the potential to impact all 32 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: An observation on 12/9/24 at 11:40 a.m., the main kitchen was reviewed. A walk-in refrigerator contained an open package of Hillshire Farm sliced turkey lunchmeat. The lunchmeat was wrapped in saran wrap and had no label or date. At 11:57 a.m., the walk-in dairy refrigerator was reviewed. The refrigerator contained 4 half gallons of [NAME] 2% milk. The best by date for all 4 containers was 12/1/24. Dietary aide (DA)-A verified the expired milk and stated they should be thrown away. At 11:59 a.m., the DietaryDirector entered the refrigerator and verified the expired milk. Dietary Director stated they were aware the date was close and didn't realize it had been expired for that long. after reviewed the date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered according to physicians orders for 1 of 2 residents (R11) reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: R11's Optional State Assessment (OSA) dated 10/10/24, indicated moderate cognitive impairment, did not reject cares, did not have shortness of breath, and used oxygen. R11's medical diagnoses form indicated the following diagnosis: pulmonary fibrosis (scarring and thickening of the tissue and between the air sacs in the lungs). R11's physician's orders dated 6/26/24, indicated the following order: • oxygen 1 to 6 liters per minute per nasal cannula or mask as needed for dyspnea (shortness of breath keep oxygen saturations greater than 91% and notify the physician). R11's medication administration record (MAR) and treatment administration record (TAR) dated November 2024, indicated R11 used oxygen on 11/1,24, 11/3/24, and 11/7/24. The MAR and TAR lacked information regarding R11's oxygen saturation levels. R11's MAR and TAR dated December 2024, and printed on 12/11/24,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to comprehensively assess and implement individualized person centered dementia care for 1 of 2 residents (R2) reviewed for dementia care. Findings include: R2's Clinical Diagnosis form, indicated the following diagnoses: vascular dementia with agitation, age-related macular degeneration, legal blindness, other symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness, primary generalized osteoarthritis, unilateral primary osteoarthritis of the left knee, aphasia (a language disorder making it difficult to communicate), insomnia, cerebral infarction (stroke) due to embolism (blood clot), type two diabetes mellitus with polyneuropathy (a complication where peripheral nerves are damaged throughout the body), and other cerebrovascular disease (a condition that affects blood flow to the brain). R2's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 had unclear speech, had short and long-term memory problems, severely impaired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure consultant pharmacist recommendations were acted upon timely for 2 of 5 residents (R2, R29) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R2's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 had a short-term and long-term memory problem, did not have physical, verbal, or other behavioral symptoms, did not reject cares, had diagnosis of non-traumatic brain dysfunction, hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus, aphasia (a disorder that affects how you communicate), and non-Alzheimer's dementia. Further, R2 had applications of ointments and medications other than to feet, and R2 took an antipsychotic. R2's physician orders indicated the following orders: • 7/29/21, nystatin powder apply to affected areas topically as needed for moist, abdominal, groin, breast folds that become red or odorous add routine for 7 to 10 days when rash recurs and continue as needed dose after treatment completed. • 1/15/24, nystatin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a topical antibiotic was transcribed as written and further failed to ensure the topical antibiotic was still necessary for 1 of 1 residents (R14) reviewed for antibiotic use. Findings include: R14's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R14 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of diabetes and hidradenitis suppurativa (disease causing puss filled boils on the skin). Furthermore, R14 was on an antibiotic. R14's dermatology provider note dated [DATE], indicated R14 was seen for a skin check. The note indicated R14s hidradenitis was clear and ordered R14 to continue the clindamycin lotion (antibiotic) for 1 year. R14's active provider orders indicated on [DATE], R14 required clindamycin phosphate 1% lotion to be applied to the abdomen/groin topically for hidradenitis. R14's clindamycin order had no end date. R14's medication administration record (MAR) dated 12/2024, indicated clindamycin 1% lotion as an active order. The MAR further indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0773 — isolated
  Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure physician notification of an abnormal lab for 1 of 1 resident (R29) reviewed for diabetes. Findings include: R29's Optional State Assessment (OSA) dated 9/11/24, indicated intact cognition, had diabetes mellitus, and received insulin injections 7 of 7 days. R29's admission Orders form dated 3/19/24, indicated a check box, Yes R29 could use Standing House Orders. Directly under the line, May use Standing House Orders, indicated a heading, Diabetes Mellitus Standing Orders If Applicable, with check boxes for Yes, No, or N/A. None of the check boxes were marked. A form, Standing Orders for Skilled Nursing Facilities revised 2023, indicated the following standing orders for diabetes management: • Notify the provider if two BG (blood glucose) results are less than 70 or greater than 400 in a 24 hour timeframe and or change in condition; if no condition change, notify provider on the next business day. • For a BG less than 70, if patient is symptomatic, administer 6 ounces of fruit juice, milk, other high carbohydrate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-03 · tag F0837 — widespread
  Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility's governing body failed to establish and implement policies regarding the management and operation of the facility and further failed to ensure the administrator reported to and was held accountable to the governing body. This had to effect all current and future residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Policies: During a review of facility policies, the facility was unable to provide a copy of numerous requested policies which included: policy on physician visits, including frequency; policy on emergency physician care; policy on physician delegation of tasks; policy on physician delegation of dietary orders; policy on governing body; policy on communication between administrator and governing body; policy on administration accountability to governing body; policy on staff licensure verification. Policies provided after requested by surveyors dated after the survey began included: Policy Regarding the Governing Body, Administration Appointment and Accountability to the Governing Body dated 9/28/24; Policy Regarding…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$13,265 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $8,021 — penalty dated 2024-10-03
• $5,244 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-10-30 for 9 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

What families pay in MN