Lyngblomsten Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 201 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 107 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 225 beds and averages 200.9 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.88 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.66 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 17% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) accurately reflected current resuscitation wishes for 2 of 4 residents (R1, R4) reviewed for advance directives. This deficient practice resulted in an immediate jeopardy (IJ) for R1 and R4 who would have received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), contrary to their wishes, in the absence of a pulse or respirations. The IJ began on [DATE] when R1's POLST dated [DATE] indicated full code status with comfort cares contrary to R1's wishes for do not resuscitate (DNR) status with comfort cares. The administrator and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the IJ on [DATE] at 1:25 p.m. The IJ was removed on [DATE] at 4:33 p.m. when the facility had implemented corrective action, however; non-compliance remained at the lower scope and severity level of D, isolated with no actual harm but potential to cause more than minimal harm. Findings include: R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to complete a safe transfer assessment for the use of sit-to-stand mechanical lift and follow manufacturer instructions and maintenance of the lift for 1 of 1 resident (R1) which resulted in a fall from the lift with a fracture. This resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for R1. The IJ began on [DATE], when R1 became tired and weak from standing in the lift while staff changed out two batteries and were unaware of the emergency lowering features which resulted in R1 letting go sustaining left arm fracture and left wrist tendon tear. The Administrator and director of nursing (DON) were notified of the IJ on [DATE] at 5:24 p.m. The IJ was removed on [DATE] after it could be verified that the facility had implemented an acceptable removal plan, however, non-compliance remained at D isolated severity level, which indicated no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy. Findings include: R1's Diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a self-administration of medication (SAM) assessment was completed and a provider order obtained to self-administer medications for 1 of 3 residents (R13) reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: R13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated severely impaired cognition and diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive neurological disorder affecting a person's memory, thinking, and behavior), heart failure and anxiety. The MDS indicated R13 required partial to moderate assistance for oral hygiene and substantial to maximum assistance for personal hygiene cares. R13's self-administration of medication assessment dated [DATE] indicated R13 did not wish to self-administer her medications. R13's undated order summary report included the following orders: - Resident is not capable of safely self-administering medications, dated 10/31/23. - Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation Nebulization Solution…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure freedom of movement was not restricted for 1 of 1 resident (R143) who was reviewed for physical restraints. Findings include: R143's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/16/25, identified severely impaired cognition. R143's diagnoses included; Parkinson's disease (a chronic progressive neurological disorder), dementia, and progressive neurological conditions accompanied by a psychotic disorder. R143 required maximum assistance to ambulate ten feet and was fully dependent on others when using the wheelchair. They also needed maximal assistance for transfers, including rolling from side to side, seating, and positioning in bed. A bed alarm was used daily. R143's care plan reviewed on 4/10/25, identified interventions for self care deficits, fall risk, and mood enhancement. The interventions included placing the resident in the common area recliner to engage in activities-such as watching the news-and for staff to observe and intervene when R143 attempted to self transfer. Staff were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was accurately coded to reflect discharge status for 1 of 1 resident (R200) reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: R200's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R200 admitted to facility on 2/10/25, from a Short-Term General Hospital, and discharged from facility on 3/6/25, discharging to Short-Term General Hospital. R200's progress note dated 3/5/25 at 10:00 a.m., indicted R200 discharge home back to [name of assisted living] signed onto hospice so no home services. R200's nursing progress note dated 3/6/25 at 11:04 a.m., indicated R200 discharged to [name of assisted living]. On 6/4/25 at 10:05 a.m., registered nurse (RN)-F, know as a MDS coordinator reviewed R200's MDS dated [DATE], and confirmed the MDS was inaccurately coded and R200 discharged home and not to the hospital. RN-F stated the MDS was expected coded correctly and correction would need to be completed. On 6/4/25 at 2:49…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to consistently utilize a communication device or provide an interpreter for 1 of 1 resident (176) reviewed who was deaf and used ASL to communicate care needs. Findings Include: R176's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified no cognitive impairment, primary language was American sign language (ASL), and an interpreter was needed to communicate with doctors and health care staff. R176's care plan revised on 12/3/24, identified impaired communication. R176's care plan identified methods for communicating such as short, direct simple phrases, visual aids, and indicated please provide me with an ASL interpreter for all significant meetings/interactions such as care conferences, cognitive/mood assessments, etc. R176's active provider orders last reviewed 5/5/25, indicated weekly pain and skin assessments, daily ambulation program and a fluid restriction order which could have required staff to communicate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure individualized activities were provided for 2 of 4 residents (R88 and R143) reviewed for activities. Findings include: R88's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R88 was admitted to the facility 2/1/25, severe cognitive impairment, sometimes feel lonely or isolated from those around, no rejection of care, wandering occurred four to six days, but less than daily, utilized a walker and wheelchair, required substantial/maximal assistance with dressing, supervision with personal hygiene, sit to lying, sit to stand, and walking, and diagnoses included hip fracture and non-Alzheimer's dementia. R88's care plan printed 6/3/25, indicated R88's leisure interests include going to church, listening to music, talking with others and watching TV and interventions included document attendance/refusals, encourage to tell staff of leisure needs, encourage short durations of activities as able, monitor activity…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess transfers with a mechanical lift or develop and implement policies to ensure the safety and supervision for 1 of 4 residents (R20) reviewed for accidents. Findings include: R20's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition and had limited function to the right arm and hand, used a wheelchair, required maximal assistance for mobility and was on hospice. R20's diagnoses included cerebral palsy, seizure and psychotic disorders, and post-polio syndrome. R20's care plan (CP) created on 6/2/23, identified mobility as an area of concern and indicated one staff assisted with bed mobility, repositioning, and sitting up. Furthermore, the CP identified R20 had a history of compression fractures to the spine and spasticity/hemiparesis of the right hand since birth, was not ambulatory and needed one to two staff for transfers with the mechanical lift (EZ Stand). R20's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 6 residents (R115) reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: R115's face sheet printed 6/5/25, indicated diagnoses of reduced mobility, cardiac pacemaker, personal history of sudden cardiac arrest, Alzheimer's disease, and heart failure. R115's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated moderately impaired cognition, use of wheelchair, substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene, lower body dressing, and bathing. R115's care plan printed revised 8/14/24, indicated self-care deficit related to congestive heart failure, pacemaker in left chest, and dementia. Staff crush my pills, mix together in applesauce to aide in swallowing. R115's physician's orders printed 6/5/25, indicated an order for metoprolol succinate extended release 50mg tablet (blood pressure medication) daily for high blood pressure. An additional order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to have a water management program consistent with nationally accepted standards, e.g., ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers) or CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). This had the potential to effect all 212 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 3/14/24 at 8:07 a.m., the director of physical plant (DPP)-A, stated he was responsible for the water management program, however was unfamiliar with regulations for a water management program which would prevent growth of Legionella and other waterborne pathogens. DDP-A explained the actions he took related to a water management program which included measuring water temperatures at various sites within the facility and annual testing for Legionella. DDP-A was not aware of additional requirements including completion of a Legionella risk assessment, creating a detailed diagram of the facility water system and following nationally accepted standards for a water management program.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide routine shaving for 1 of 1 resident (R36) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) who was dependent on staff for cares. Findings include: R36's face sheet printed 3/14/23, indicated R36 had diagnoses including heart failure (progressive disease that affects pumping action of heart muscle), morbid obesity, arthritis, and respiratory failure (serious condition that affects breathing and oxygen levels). R36's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R36 had intact cognition, no care refusal behaviors, and requires partial to moderate assist with personal hygiene. R36's care plan dated 6/28/23, indicated R36 had a self care deficit and will be clean and well groomed through the review period. The care plan indicated R36 required assist of one as needed with dressing, grooming and bathing. The care plan did not include shaving. R36's resident care sheet indicated shaving as needed. R36's task list…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to make a follow-up appointment for 1 of 2 residents(R54) reviewed for vision. Findings include: R54's face sheet printed 3/14/24, indicated admission date of 11/8/22 and included diagnoses of diabetes mellitus type 2, end stage kidney disease, bilateral below the knee amputations, and cataract (clouding of lens of the eye that affects vision) extraction bilateral. R54's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R54 had intact cognition, was dependent on staff for toileting, and required partial to moderate assist with personal hygiene, and transfers and rolling required substantial to maximum assistance. The MDS also indicated adequate vision, and no corrective lenses. R54's care plan printed 3/14/24, did not include a visual impairment. During interview on 3/11/24 at 6:11 p.m., R54 indicated she has asked more than once to see an eye doctor over the past year. R54 stated she feels like she is losing her vision and it is blurry…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$101,482 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $86,775 — penalty dated 2024-08-29
• $14,707 — penalty dated 2024-05-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 28 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN