Shirley Chapman Sholom Home East

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 228 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 109 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.65 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 91% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 91.7 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.21 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.47 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.72 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.55 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.65 to 1.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-07-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure multi-dose medications were labeled upon opening and discarded in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 2 medications rooms reviewed and 1 of 5 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. Findings include:R92's entry tracking Minimum Data Set (MDS), indicated R92 admitted for short term rehabilitation on 7/16/26. An observation and interview on 7/20/26 at 5:19 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-E was preparing to administer Lispro insulin to R92. When R92's insulin pen was removed, the open date and initials label was blank. RN-E stated all insulin pens were supposed to be dated with the open date, but on the transitional care unit (TCU) residents were not here for very long so it gets missed sometimes. R42's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated R42 had severe cognitive impairment and received hospice services.R25's significant change MDS dated [DATE], indicated R25 had severe cognitive impairment and received hospice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, document review, the facility failed to ensure a proper sanitization technique was used to obtain food temperatures from ready-to-serve meals from the steam table. This finding had the potential to increase the risk of cross contamination and affect 17 residents who resided on the fourth floor. Findings include: During observation on 7/21/26 at 11:50 a.m., on the fourth floor, dietary aid (DA)-A placed stainless steel trays containing food on the steam table. DA-A washed her hands, put on gloves, got a food thermometer and started to check the food temperatures. DA-A checked the soup temperature first and wiped the thermometer with a napkin, then she checked the steamed vegetables temperature and once again used the same napkin to wipe the thermometer. DA-A stated she always used a napkin to clean the thermometer before she checked the next food item. DA-A stated she was never told to do otherwise. During interview on 7/21/26 at 1:16 p.m., DA-B was cleaning the kitchenette after serving lunch to residents on the second floor. DA-B explained he used a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-23 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure self-administration of medications was assessed and determined to be appropriate for 1 of 1 resident (R9) reviewed for self-administration of medications.Findings include:R9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R9 was cognitively intact and required varying levels of assistance with activities of daily living and mobility. Diagnoses included low blood pressure when standing, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, lung disease, and a pacemaker.R9's Self-Administration of Medications (SAM) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R9 responded No when asked whether he wanted to self-administer medications or treatments.R9's care plan dated 6/26/26, failed to identify interventions related to bedside storage or self-administration of eye medications.R9's medical record, reviewed on 07/21/26, lacked evidence of provider orders for Systane Complete or ketotifen fumarate eye drops or authorization for the medications to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-23 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the use of as needed (i.e., PRN) psychotropic medication was limited to 14 days or extended to a certain date with supporting rationale provided by the medical provider for 1 of 5 residents (R8) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: R8's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R8 had severe cognitive impairment, received hospice services, and had diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, renal failure, Alzheimer's disease, depression and psychotic disorder. R8's medical orders dated 7/22/26, included an order for lorazepam (anti-anxiety medication) 0.5 milligrams (mg) orally every 6 hours as needed (PRN) for anxiety, with a discontinuation date of 9/2026. R8's medical administration records (MAR) indicated R8 did not receive any doses of lorazepam between 3/2026 and 7/2026. R8's medical record lacked supporting rationale for the lorazepam order. During interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-23 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure that a discharge notice was sent to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (OOLTC) for 2 of 2 resident (R87, R89) reviewed for discharge.Findings include: R87 R87's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R87 was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of hepatic encephalopathy (a brain condition caused by severe liver disease), chronic liver failure, cirrhosis (scarring of the liver), systolic congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. R87's face sheet reviewed on 7/23/26, indicated R87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and transferred to United hospital on 4/27/26. R87's progress notes dated 4/27/26, indicated R87 had a change in condition. The nurse notified the provider, who ordered transfer to United Hospital for further evaluation. R87 left the facility with paramedics at 10:50 p.m. A facility document titled Monthly Notice to MN Office of Ombudsman for Long-Term Care of Emergency Acute Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure provider orders were followed to put on leg wraps for 1 of 1 resident (R6) reviewed for edema. In addition, the facility failed to ensure effective collaboration between the facility and the hospice agency for 1 of 1 resident (R8) reviewed who received hospice services. Findings include: R6 R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R6 had intact cognition, had no behaviors and did not reject cares. MDS indicated R6 needed moderate assistance with dressing, putting her shoes on, and showers. R6's Profile form dated 7/23/26, identified diagnoses of essential hypertension, non-rheumatic aortic stenosis, diabetes type II, prosthetic heart valve replacement, morbid obesity, and metabolic encephalopathy. R6's medical orders form dated 7/23/26 included an order to apply leg wraps to bilateral lower extremities; on in the morning and off at night. This order was dated 11/10/25. R6's July treatment medication record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented for 1 of 3 residents (R90) who were at risk of falls. Findings include:R90's face sheet printed 7/22/26, indicated R90 was recently admitted and had diagnoses of stroke with aphagia (trouble finding words to speak), dementia with mood disturbance, and a history of falling. R90's Comprehensive Nursing assessment dated [DATE], indicated R90 had short and long-term memory problems, had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, and had a history of falling prior to admission. R90's care plan revised 7/20/26, indicated:-R90 had a self-care deficit with mobility and required assist of 1 staff with a gait belt and four wheeled walker for transfers and mobility.- R90 was at risk for falls related to dementia and wandering. Interventions included keeping bed at transferring height, call light in reach and to ensure R90 wore appropriate footwear. R90's medical record lacked indication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure documentation of clinical indications for the continued use of a foley catheter was in place and failed to ensure interventions were in place to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 1 residents (R90) reviewed with a catheter. Findings include: R90's face sheet printed 7/22/26, indicated R90 was recently admitted and had diagnoses of stroke with aphagia (trouble finding words to speak), dementia with mood disturbance, urine retention and had a urinary device. R90's Comprehensive Nursing assessment dated [DATE], indicated R90 had short and long-term memory problems, had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, and was admitted with a foley catheter. R90's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], indicated R90 had hematuria (blood in the urine) with urinary retention and required a urology consultation. A foley catheter was placed with a plan to discharge with the catheter and have a trial of void in clinic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed proper infection prevention and control practices by using the required personal protective equipment (PPE) during Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 1 of 1 resident (R11) reviewed for infection control. Findings include: R11's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R11 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for total body care, bed mobility, and transfers. Diagnoses included chronic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage (brain bleed).R11's care plan dated 7/21/26, indicated EBP had been initiated on 6/17/26, due to a pressure wound on the right heel. The care plan instructed staff to wear a gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities, including dressing, providing hygiene care, and changing briefs.During observation on 7/21/26 at 8:45 a.m., nursing assistant (NA)-A provided personal care to R11…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure dietary staff was wearing beard guards/restraints when preparing food. This had the potential to affect all 93 residents who reside at the facility and consume food from the kitchen. During observation on 4/16/25 at 10:03 p.m., cook (C)-A had a beard and was preparing roast beef and slicing it on the meat slicer. C-A was not wearing a beard guard/restraint. During observation on 4/16/25 at 10:11 a.m., the culinary manager (CM) had a beard and was stiring a large vat of beef stew. Then he started taking food temperatures and putting the food into an insulated food cart. The CM was not wearing a beard guard/restraint. During interview on 4/16/25 at 10:33 p.m., the CM verified the staff with beards were not wearing beard guards and it had never been an expectation for them to do so. He further verified the facility didn't have any beard guards/restraints available to use, stating if it had been an expectation to wear one he wouldn't have a beard. During interview on 4/16/25 at 2:08 p.m., the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $712K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN