St Anthony Health & Rehabilitation
3700 Foss Road Northeast, St Anthony, MN 55421 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 110 certified beds · (612) 788-9673 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $10,203 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-07)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.6% | 18.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.3% | 4.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.9% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.0% | 2.6% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.9% | 4.1% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.2% | 4.0% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 22.4% | 20.5% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.3% | 12.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.9% | 96.1% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.9% | 5.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.0% | 24.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 21.2% | 17.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.3% | 1.9% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 72.7% | 82.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.4% | 23.5% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.3% | 14.8% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.48 | 1.61 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.20 | 1.90 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 90 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 64.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 56 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.9%CMS range 38.0–58.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 7.2–15.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 64.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 51.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 51.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.3%CMS range 5.4–13.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.03 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 77.9 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.13 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.88 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.21 to 0.92 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper usage of personal protective equipment (PPE) while sorting soiled linens and personal laundry. This had the potential to affect all 92 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:During tour of the laundry room on 6/16/26 at 3:17p.m. no PPE was observed anywhere in the dirty linen sorting area.On 6/16/26 at 3:17 p.m. housekeeping supervisor (HS) confirmed staff do not wear the required PPE while sorting soiled laundry. HS stated they will wear gloves but no other items. This had been the practice since they started working in the laundry room the previous year.On 6/16/26 at 3:09 p.m. administrator stated their expectation was staff wore full PPE, including gown, gloves, and goggles while sorting laundry.On 6/16/26 at 3:47 p.m. administrator stated the facility did not have a laundry policy.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure privacy for 1 of 1 resident (R101) reviewed for dignity. Findings include: R101 face sheet indicated admission on [DATE], diagnoses included Urinary Tract Infection, Neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, Infection and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter. During observation on 6/17/26 at 10:29 a.m. R101 was ambulating with occupational therapist (OT)-A. An uncovered urinary catheter bag was hanging on the lowest bar of the wheeled walker. R101 and OT-A ambulated down the hallway, past the nurse's station and dining room, to the end of another hall before he sat down to rest. R101 walked past 2 staff and 2 residents. During interview on 6/17/26 at 10:40 a.m. OT-A stated she forgot to move the privacy bag with the catheter bag to the walker. She stated catheter bags should remained covered for resident's privacy. During interview on 6/17/26 at 1:20 p.m. R101 stated preference to have catheter bag covered when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow standards of practice for medication management for 1 of 8 residents (R72) reviewed for medication administration.Findings include:During a medication administration observation on 6/16/26 at 5:20 p.m., it was noted R72's order in the facility's electronic medication administration record (EMAR) indicated R72's Morphine Sulfate order was dispensed as 15 milligram (MG) tablet (TAB) with a dose of 2.5mg to be given sublingually (under the tongue) every (q) 3 hours. However, the Morphine sulfate card from the pharmacy showed the medication was a 2.5mg sublingual tablet to be given q6hrs. Registered nurse (RN)-A confirmed they did not match and tended to happen with sublingual tablet orders.R72's annual minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R72 was admitted [DATE], severely cognitively impaired, and had the following diagnoses: atrial fibrillation (top two chambers of the heart don't pump correctly), coronary artery disease,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed for 1 of 5 residents (R13) reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include:R13's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R13 was admitted [DATE], severely cognitively impaired, and had the following diagnoses: hypertension (HTN) (high blood pressure), renal insufficiency, diabetes, thyroid disorder, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and a stroke.R13's Clinical physician orders printed 6/17/26, indicated R13 was currently prescribed the following HTN medications:Metoprolol Succinate extended release (ER)-50 milligrams (MG) tablet- give 50MG by mouth once daily for HTN. Start date-2/26/26Lisinopril 40MG table- give 1 tablet daily for HTN- start date 2/26/26Amlodipine Besylate 10MG tablet- Give 1 tablet by mouth every night at bedtime for HTN- start date-2/25/26R13's monthly pharmacy recommendation dated 3/13/26, indicated the pharmacist had requested hold parameters for the above medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure binding arbitration agreements were clearly communicated in a form and manner residents understood prior to signing for 1 of 3 residents (R43) reviewed for binding arbitration. This had the potential to affect residents who signed binding arbitration prior to 5/1/26. Findings include: R43's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) indicated admission on [DATE], intact cognition with diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia, and moderate vision impairment (limited vision: not able to see newspaper headlines but can identify objects), and R43 always needed to have someone help with reading written materials. Exhibit H- Binding Arbitration Agreement undated, included signature of R43. During interview on 6/17/26 at 11:23 a.m. R43 stated he would have not signed a binding arbitration agreement. R43 stated legal issues at the time of his admission would have kept him from signing an arbitration agreement. He would never agree to a mediator. He was not able to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 residents (R11, R76) were offered, educated and/or provided the pneumococcal vaccination series as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), who were reviewed for immunizations.Findings include: A CDC Adult Immunization Schedule by age topic, dated 08/07/2025, identified various tables when each (or all) of the pneumococcal vaccinations should be obtained. This identified when an adult over [AGE] years old had not received the complete series of pneumococcal vaccination (i.e., PPSV23, PCV20 and PCV13) or their history is unknown, then the patient and provider may choose to administer Pneumococcal 20-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20), 1 dose of PCV-15, or PCV-21. R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R11 was admitted on [DATE], [AGE] years old, severely cognitively impaired, and had the following diagnoses: hypertension (HTN) (high blood pressure), renal insufficiency, diabetes (DM), non-Alzheimer's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and document review, the facility failed to update the care plan with specific interventions for 1 of 1 resident (R3) reviewed for falls.Findings include: R3's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R3 had severe cognitive impairment, disorganized thinking, and needed extensive assistance with toileting, bed mobility and transfers. The MDS lacked identification of falls for R3. R3's document titled with R3's name undated, indicated after a fall on 6/8/25, an intervention for PRN medications was put in place. Furthermore, the document indicated after a fall on 6/9/25, interventions for frequent rounding and hospice to review side effect monitoring for medications was put in place. R3's care plan revised 6/20/25, lacked interventions for PRN medications after a fall on 6/8/25 and frequent rounding and hospice to review side effect monitoring for medications after a fall on 6/9/25. During an interview on 7/22/25 at 12:03 p.m., nursing assistant (NA)-A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance Assessment and Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI) committee effectively sustained ongoing compliance related to repeat citations from past surveys in regards to quality of care, care plans and self-administration of medications (SAM) which were also identified during this survey. This had the potential to effect all 74 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility CASPER Report dated 3/17/2025, identified the facility was cited F684 for quality of care, F656 development/implementation of comprehensive care plans, and F554 SAM during the survey exited 3/7/2024. See F684: Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to follow current physician orders and parameters for 2 of 5 residents (R28, R61) reviewed for medications. See F656: Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed and maintained to ensure appropriate care was provided for 1 of 1 residents (R66) reviewed for increased care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure a self-administration of medications assessment was completed to allow residents to safely administer their own medications for 1 of 1 residents (R66) observed with medications at bedside. Findings include: R66's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated she had intact cognition, did not refuse care or medications and had the following diagnoses: cancer, malnutrition, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and/or chronic lung disease. The MDS further indicated R66 took antipsychotic, antianxiety, antidepressant, opioids and required oxygen therapy. R66's order summary report printed on 4/10/25, included antianxiety medications, antidepressant medications, antipsychotic medications and narcotic pain medications which can cause blurriness, dizziness and sedation. Additionally, R66 required nebulizer breathing treatments 4 times throughout the day and the use of supplemental oxygen. The order summary lacked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to update a care plan 1 of 1 residents (R66) reviewed for a declining resident. Findings include: R66's minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated she had intact cognition, did not refuse care or medications and had the following diagnoses: cancer, malnutrition, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and/or chronic lung disease. The MDS further indicated R66 was independent with eating, personal hygiene, toileting, dressing, mobility, transfers and received hospice services. R66's face sheet indicated R66 was contracted Hospice of the Midwest to receive hospice cares and services. R66's care plan indicated R66 had a self-care deficit and required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's) due to terminal lung cancer/respiratory failure. The care plan also indicated R66 received hospice services, and the nurse manager was the designated facility interdisciplinary team (IDT) member to collaborate with hospice to ensure the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 22 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provided nail care for 1 of 4 residents (R15) reviewed for dependent activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings include: R15's PPS 5 day scheduled Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], included R15 was admitted [DATE] and had moderate cognitive impairment. R15 had impairment on one side and was dependent with bathing. Personal hygiene assessment was not recorded on the MDS submission. R15's undated care plan included a focus of being at risk for excessive bruising and bleeding due to use of coumadin (a blood thinner) with an intervention to remind R15 to use extra caution when shaving. The care plan included R15 had a self care deficit and required assistance with ADLs due to weakness, impaired mobility and having multiple disease processes and had an intervention of needing assistance with all ALDs. On 4/7/25 at 2:52 p.m., R15 was observed to have fingernails that extended past the tips of his fingers on both hands.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to follow current physician orders and parameters for 2 of 5 residents (R28, R61) reviewed for medications. Findings include: R28's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], included R28 had moderate cognitive impairment. R28 had diagnoses of gastroparesis (a disease of the digestive system), malnutrition, fecal impaction (a blockage of stool in the intestine). R28's last signed physician orders dated 3/4/25, included an order for prochiorperazine maleate (a medication to treat nausea and vomiting) 10 mg by mouth every 5 hours as needed for nausea and vomiting, polyethylene glycol (a medication to treat constipation) 17 grams by mouth one time a day, and metoprolol tartrate 25 mg by mouth twice a day with instructions to hold the medication if systolic blood pressure was less than 100. R28's medication administration record (MAR) for April included record of medication being given different than the most recent provider orders. Administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to provide range of motion (ROM) exercises for 1 of 1 residents (R61) reviewed for mobility. Findings include: R61's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], included diagnoses of neuromyelitis optica (inflammation of the nerves of the eye and spinal cord which may cause vision loss and muscle weakness), diabetes, encephalopathy (a disorder of the brain which may cause confusion, memory loss and personality changes). R61's MDS included she was dependent for dressing, eating and oral hygiene. R61's undated care plan, included R61 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) due to impaired or decreased mobility, weakness and multiple disease processes. Interventions included to assist with positioning and mobility as needed. R61's care plan failed to include specific ROM exercises. R61's care conference note dated 3/19/25, included R61's family requested therapy for ROM due to stiffness. R61's medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the consulting pharmacist (CP) failed to identify and report irregularities related to resident parameters for 2 of 2 residents (R28, R61) reviewed for physician ordered parameters. Findings Include: R28's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], included R28 had moderate cognitive impairment. R28 had diagnoses of gastroparesis (a disease of the digestive system), malnutrition, fecal impaction (a blockage of stool in the intestine). R28's last signed physician orders dated 3/4/25, included an order for metoprolol tartrate 25 milligrams (mg) by mouth twice a day with instructions to hold the medication if systolic blood pressure was less than 100. R28's medication administration record (MAR) for April included record of medication being given without documentation of blood pressure having been checked prior to administration. The order on the MAR included metoprolol tartrate 25 mg by mouth twice a day without instructions to hold the medication. R28's previous six…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of sexual abuse for 2 of 2 residents (R1 and R2) when they failed recognize the need to assess R1 for the ability to consent prior to the incident. Findings include: Review of the report to the State Agency (SA) indicated on 2/05/25, at 5:55 p.m. R1 and R2 were being sexually intimate in R1's room. Staff attempted to separate the two and have R2 go to his room. The report indicated the residents were closely monitored throughout the night to prevent further incident, investigation was initiated, and physician was updated. Review of the 5-day investigation report to the SA indicated on 2/12/25, R1 had BIM's of 4 which was severely cognitively impaired and R2 of 10 mild cognitive impairment both residents have not been deemed needing legal guardian and both make their own decisions with family input. In addition the investigation indicated both residents were seen by Associated Clinic of Psychology (ACP) who noted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 resident (R1) was comprehensively assessed for their capacity to consent prior to engaging in sexual activity with R2. Findings include: Review of the report to the State Agency (SA) indicated on 2/05/25, at 5:55 p.m. R1 and R2 were being sexually intimate in R1's room. Staff attempted to separate the two and have R2 go to his room. The report indicated the residents were closely monitored throughout the night to prevent further incident, investigation was initiated, and physician was updated. Review of the 5-day investigation report to the SA indicated on 2/12/25, R1 had BIMMS of 4 which was severely cognitively impaired and R2 of 10 mild cognitive impairment both residents have not been deemed needing legal guardian and both make their own decisions with family input. In addition the investigation indicated both residents were seen by Associated Clinic of Psychology (ACP) who noted they were alert and oriented to family…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-07 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman for Long Term Care (LTC) of resident transfers to the hospital for 3 of 3 residents (R3, R4 and R5) reviewed for hospitalization. This had the potential to affect all residents transferred to hospital. Findings include: R3's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated diagnoses included cerebrovascular accident (stroke), diabetes, anemia, malnutrition, and epilepsy. R3's progress notes indicated R3 was hospitalized from [DATE] to 5/17/24. R3's record lacked evidence the Ombudsman for LTC was notified of R3's transfer to the hospital. R4's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]/24, indicated diagnoses which included peripheral vascular disease or peripheral arterial disease (impaired circulation to the peripheral (distant arteries) of the hands and feet), methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (an antibiotic resistant organism) infection, pressure ulcer of unspecified joint, and local…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-07 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of a bed hold upon transfer for hospitalization for 3 of 4 residents (R3, R4, and R5 ) reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: R3's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated diagnoses included cerebrovascular accident (stroke), diabetes, anemia, malnutrition, and epilepsy. R3's progress note dated 4/28/24 at 6:27 p.m., indicated licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A found R3's gastrostomy tube (G-tube) had been pulled out, the on-call nurse practitioner (NP) was contacted and ordered R3 to be transported to emergency department (ED) for G-tube replacement. LPN-A notified family member (FM)-B of the situation via phone. R3's progress note dated 4/28/24 at 9:42 p.m., indicated R3 was admitted to Hennepin County Medical Center hospital (HCMC) due to a fever and the need for further testing. R3's progress note dated 5/17/24 at 9:46 p.m., indicated R3 returned to the facility from HCMC on 5/17/24 at 5:28…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-07 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure long term residents received routine physician visits (every 60 days) for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for routine physician care. Findings include: R3's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated diagnoses included cerebrovascular accident (stroke), diabetes, anemia, malnutrition, and epilepsy. R3's clinical record indicated R3's physician completed routine physician visits on 2/5/24 and 5/22/24, greater than 60 days between visits. However, R3's clinical record lacked evidence a physician visit had been provided between 2/5/24 and 5/22/24. On 10/4/24 at 1:28 p.m., the administrator provided an email which contained the entire chart from the provider for R3. The provided chart indicated physician visits had been completed on 2/5/24 and 5/22/24, with no evidence of a physician visit within 60 days of 2/5/24. On 10/7/24 at 12:19 p.m., director of nursing (DON) and infection preventionist (IP) stated the medical records…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 4 residents (R3, R9) reviewed for immunizations were offered and/or provided the pneumococcal vaccine series as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to help reduce the risk of associated infection(s). Findings include: A CDC Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults feature dated 3/15/2023, identified various tables when each (or all) of the pneumococcal vaccinations should be obtained. This identified when an adult over [AGE] years old had received the complete series (i.e., PPSV23 and PCV13; see below) then the patient and provider may choose to administer Pneumococcal 20-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20) for patients who had received Pneumococcal 13-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV13) at any age and Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine 23 (PPSV23) at or after [AGE] years old. R3's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R3's date of birth was 2/10/1948 ([AGE] years old), and diagnoses included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated food items were disposed of after expiration date and were properly stored, labeled, and dated. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated foods were disposed of after expiration on 1 of 4 resident fridges. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 72 residents who recieve food from the kitchen. Findings include: During an observation on 3/4/24 at 6:21 p.m., the kitchen walk in refrigerator was reviewed. The following items were found to be expired and not to contain labels. -egg salad in a plastic container with plastic wrap covering had no date of when it was made. -a container of macaroni noodle salad with a mayonnaise dressing was made on 2/25/24 and was to be used by 3/1/24. -a container of cranberries was prepared on 2/25/24 and was to be used by 3/1/24. -a opened container of [NAME] heavy whipping cream had no open date however had a use by date of 3/3/24. During an observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to develop and implement a corrective action plan related to repeat deficiencies regarding food storage, labeling and food safety. This had the potential to affect all 80 residents who resided at the facility. Findings Include: Review of the QAPI monthly and quarterly meeting minutes included the following data: The dietary director (DD) and registered dietician (RD) did not attend the following QAPI meetings, and the committee did not discuss issues regarding quality improvement plans regarding food storage, labeling and food safety in the kitchen: 4/18/23-DD and RD not in attendance; food storage, labeling and safety not discussed. 5/16/23- DD and RD not in attendance; food storage, labeling and safety not discussed. 6/20/23- DD and RD not in attendance; food storage, labeling and safety not discussed. 7/18/23- DD and RD not in attendance; food storage, labeling and safety not discussed. 8/15/23- DD and RD not in attendance; food storage, labeling and safety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure personal protection equipment (PPE) was used when sorting laundry. This had the potential to impact all 77 residents who reside in the facility. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure resident ice packs were stored separately from resident food in 2 of 4 unit resident refrigerators. This had the potential to impact all 30 residents who reside on those units. The facility further failed to ensure proper glove usage and handwashing was implemented for 1 of 1 resident (R22) reviewed for personal cares. Laundry During an observation on 3/6/24 at 7:45 a.m., housekeeping assistant (HA)-B was observed in the laundry room. HA-B had gloves in place. HSK-A took a clear bag of dirty laundry from a laundry cart that was filled with several clear tied bags. Without donning an isolation gown, HA-B had opened the bag and sorted it into appropriate laundry carts. HA-B then obtained another clear bag from the same cart and without donning a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess residents' eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccination according to The Centers of Disease and Control and Prevention (CDC) for 3 of 5 (R48, R66, R72) reviewed for vaccinations. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure education and declination was obtained for declining the pneumococcal vaccination for 2 of 5 (R66, R72) residents reviewed for vaccinations. Findings include: The CDC identified on the Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults Chart, dated 3/15/23, Adult 65 years of age or older who had received the PPSV23 (pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine 23) only at any age should receive one dose of either pneumococcal 20-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20) or pneumococcal 15-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV15). The dose of PCV20 or PCV15 should be administered at least one year after the most recent PPSV23 dose. R48's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R48 was [AGE] years old, had sever cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a self administration of medication assessment (SAM) and physician's order to self administer medications was completed to allow residents to safely administer their own medications for 3 of 3 residents (R331, R45, R1) observed with medications at the bedside. In addition, the facility also failed to prevent 1 of 1 resident (R1) from self-administering water flushes via gastrostomy tube without a SAM assessment. Findings include: R331's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated moderately impaired cognition, did not have behaviors, did not reject cares, had complaints of difficulty or pain when swallowing, had coughing or choking during meals. R331's State Optional Assessment (SOA) dated 2/27/24, indicated R331 required extensive assist with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting, and limited assistance with eating. R331's Medical Diagnosis form indicated the following diagnoses: dysphagia following cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to immediately report an injury of unknown cause to the administrator or State agency for 1 of 1 resident (R27) who was assessed to have a purple bruise to right side of back measured at 14 centimeters (cm) by 21 cm, reviewed for abuse. Findings Include: R27's significant change Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], indicated R27 was cognitively impaired with limited range of motion to one upper extremity, impairment to both lower extremity and was dependent on staff for toileting. R27's vulnerable adult care plan updated 2/14/24, indicated staff were to assist R27 in removing self from dangerous, abusive situations. Assist R27 in reporting of abuse and neglect as appropriate. Staff were to investigate all signs, symptoms, or accusations as appropriate and provide a safe environment for R27. R27's face sheet printed 3/7/24, indicated diagnosis included alcoholic cirrhosis of liver with ascites (the increased pressure in the portal vein can cause fluid to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan and develop and implement new interventions following a resident (R38) with a history of suicidal ideation and multiple suicide attempts reviewed for comprehensive care plan. Findings include: R38's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R38 had moderately impaired cognition and diagnoses of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, acute stress reaction, and suicidal ideation. It further indicated R38 required substantial/maximal assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL) and mobility. R38's after visit summary dated 12/4/23, indicated R38 was seen on an emergency basis for depression and diagnosed with suicidal ideation. It also included a crisis stabalization plan (safety plan) to be used once R38 left the hospital and included the following: -warning signs of: feeling sad and arguing with her sister - coping strategies of: listening to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with personal hygiene for 1 of 3 residents (R54) reviewed for activities of daily living who needed assistance from staff. Findings Include: R54's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated R54 was cognitively intact, did not exhibit rejection of cares, and required supervision with toileting and dressing, R54's self care deficit care plan, revised 2/1/24, indicated status post right hip replacement impaired mobility and multiple disease process. Interventions included assist with activity of daily living (ADL), positioning and mobility as needed; provide guided maneuvering of extremities, verbal cueing and sufficient time for resident to perform and or assist during dressing and other ADL's as needed; extensive assist of 1 after incontinent episodes. R54's behavior careplan dated 11/24/23, indicated R54 was resistive to care often and interventions included allow R54 to make decisions,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line dressing change was completed per standard practice for 1 of 1 resident (R181) reviewed for PICC lines. In addition, the facility failed to ensure an order was completed for a weight re-check on 1 of 1 resident (R57) reviewed for nutrition who had a 14.2 percent weight loss in one month. Further, the facility failed to ensure effective collaboration between the facility and a contracted hospice organization that affected 1 of 1 resident (R47) reviewed for hospice services. Findings included: R181 R181's admission record printed 3/6/24, indicated R181 admitted to facility on 2/29/24 with diagnoses including bacterial infections, acute cystitis (bladder infection), acute embolism and thrombosis of left calf muscular vein (blood clot), type 2 diabetes mellitus, and morbid obesity. R181's admission evaluation (AE) dated 2/29/24, indicated R181 had mild cognitive impairment. The AE…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to assess for and identify potential triggers for 1 of 1 resident (R38) who had a history of trauma. Findings include: R38's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R38 had moderately impaired cognition and diagnoses of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, acute stress reaction, and suicidal ideation. It further indicated R38 had little interest or pleasure in doing things and feeling down, depressed or hopeless nearly every day in the look back period. Trouble falling/staying asleep or sleeping too much and trouble concentrating several days and thoughts of being better off dead or hurting herself, half or more of the days. R38's admission trauma screening dated 4/3/23, lacked notation of trauma history or potential triggers. R38's medical record lacked any additional trauma screenings. R38's mood and behavior care plan dated 10/25/23, indicated R38 sees on site psychology for behaviors…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to monitor side effects for 2 of 2 residents (R32, R181) reviewed for anticoagulation (blood thinner) therapy. Findings include: R32's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated intact cognition, had a diagnosis of longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rhythm that can lead to blood clots in the heart), and received anticoagulant therapy. R32's physician orders indicated R32 had an order on 3/1/22, for Eliquis (blood thinner) 5 milligrams take one tablet twice daily for atrial fibrillation. The orders lacked interventions for monitoring for side effects of taking the blood thinner. R32's care plan lacked interventions for monitoring for side effects of taking the blood thinner. R32's medical record lacked evidence R32 required monitoring for side effects of anticoagulation therapy. During interview on 3/7/24 at 8:31 a.m., trained medication aide (TMA) stated Eliquis was taken for pain and staff should watch for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure beverages were served in the appropriate consistency for 1 of 1 resident (R48) reviewed for therapeutic diets. Findings include: R48's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R48 had severe cognitive impairment, required assistance with eating, required a therapeutic and regular textured diet. R48's had diagnoses of vascular dementia, chronic kidney disease, degenerative disease of nervous system, and cognitive deficit. R48's nutrition care area assessment (CAA) dated 1/14/24, identified a functional problem that affected R48's ability to eat to include, Need for special diet or altered consistency which might not appeal to resident. R48's care plan dated 1/17/24, indicated R48 was at risk for altered nutrition and instructed staff to Provide, serve diet as ordered. R48's physician order dated 1/24/24, indicated per speech language pathology (SLP) recommendation, R48's diet changed to regular diet texture with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$10,203 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $10,203 — penalty dated 2024-03-07
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $732K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245267. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.