Stewartville Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 45.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 42.7 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.36 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.60 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.09 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-04-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from verbal abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R4) when R1 who had a history of cognitive impairment, personality changes, impulsiveness, and making poor choices, repeatedly yelled at R4, made a threat to shoot him in the head, and entered his room on three different occasions.Findings include: R4's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], he was cognitively intact, no depression or behaviors. He was occasionally incontinent with bowel movements and frequently incontinent with urination. His care areas triggered activities of daily living, urinary incontinence, falls, and pressure ulcers. R4's care plan dated 1/15/26, indicated he had polyneuropathy (nerves to the arms and legs are damaged causing numbness, tingling, pain, and weakness), repeated falls, heart issues, pain in the right hip and knees, weakness, and lower back pain. He needed assistance with the toilet, bathing, grooming, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to implement care planned fall interventions for 1 of 2 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents. This resulted in actual harm for R1 who had an unwitnessed fall while self-transferring when the motion sensor alarm did not sound and failed to alert staff that R1 was self-transferring as intended per care plan. Additionally, the facility failed to determine why the motion sensor alarm did not alert staff following the fall and added a second alarm. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had dementia, anxiety, and depression with severe cognitive deficits. R1 used a wheelchair and walker, was frequently incontinent of bladder and occasional incontinent of bowel. R1's care plan dated 2/20/23, indicated R1 had delusional disorders, neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies (a type of progressive dementia that leads to a decline in thinking, reasoning, and independent function) and was at risk for falls…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure resident assessment to self-administer medications, was implemented and followed consistently in accordance with physician orders for 1 on 1 resident (R8) reviewed for self-administration of medications.Findings include: R8's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/11/26, identified R8 had impaired cognition and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living(ADL) and maximal assistance with mobility. R8's care plan dated 05/04/26 indicated, resident would like to administer oral medications and be more independent with ADL's. Resident was unable to self-administer safely medications, may self-administer inhalers/nebs after set up only. R8's active medications list review included an order for R8 to self-administer inhalers and nebulizer treatments only after set up by staff and could not self-administer oral medications safely dated 11/09/23. R8's self-administration of medication assessment dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the required Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was provided timely to 1 of 3 residents (R27) reviewed for beneficiary notices.Findings include: R27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R27 had intact cognition. R27's Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form dated 6/15/26, indicated R27's last covered day of Medicare Part A service was on 2/15/26. R27's NOMNC form dated 6/15/26, indicated R27's last covered day of Medicare Part A service was on 2/14/26. The form was signed by the resident dated 6/15/26. Additionally, R27's Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review form dated 6/15/26, indicated R27's last covered day of Medicare Part A service was on 5/23/26. R27's NOMNC form dated 6/15/26, indicated R27's last covered day of Medicare Part A service was on 5/23/26. The form was signed by the resident dated 6/15/26. During an interview on 7/1/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for 2 of 3 resident (R4, R1) reviewed for hospice care and smoking. Findings Include: R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R4 was moderately cognitively impaired. R4's diagnosis included dementia (syndrome characterized by a decline in cognitive function, affecting memory, thinking, behavior, and the ability to perform everyday activities) with moderate agitation During record review on 6/16/26 at 10:01 a.m., noted R4 was admitted to hospice on 1/30/26. R4's comprehensive care plan failed to include a resident-specific hospice care plan, including hospice diagnosis, hospice provider information, and resident choices and preferences. During an interview on 6/16/26 at 1:24 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-A stated she is unsure why R4 was put on hospice, probably due to his infections or maybe his worsening dementia. RN-A stated she didn't know what end-of life preferences R4 had.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide supervision to 1of 1 resident (R8) reviewed for activities of daily living who was left unattended on the toilet for more than 1 hour. Findings Include: R8's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/11/26, identified R8 had impaired cognition and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living and maximal assistance with mobility. R8 's care plan dated 5/4/26 indicated, resident had a history of falling related to impulsiveness and perceived abilities. Motion sensor alarm to monitor movements due to unattended / unassisted transfers resulting in falls, reminders to use call light for all transfers. Record review indicated R8's had an unwitnessed fall on 6/12/26 at 10:06 a.m., in the bathroom, right beside the toilet and the wheelchair. R8's head was found leaning against the corner of the doorway. During an observation on 6/16/26 9:03 AM, R8 was assisted onto the toilet by nursing assistant (NA)-A. At 9:40 a.m., R8 was observed sitting on the toilet, chin to chest,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to complete weekly wound assessment and documentation for 1 of 1 resident (R6) reviewed for pressure Ulcer/Injury who had 2 unhealed stage 4 pressure ulcers (full-thickness skin and tissue loss, exposed bone, ligament, cartilage, or muscle) on bilateral buttocks. This had the potential to delay identification of changes in wound status and impact timely interventions to promote healing. Findings Include:R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/3/26, identified R6 had intact cognition and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living and mobility. MDS identified two stage 4 pressure ulcers, pressure reducing device for bed, chair and application of nonsurgical dressing and ointment.R6's diagnoses included stage 4 pressure on right and left buttock, hereditary spastic paraplegia (inherited disorders that cause progressive stiffness and weakness in the legs, often leading to mobility challenges).R6's care plan dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were available for administration per physician order for 1 of 1 resident (R37) reviewed for pharmacy services. Findings include: R37 face sheet indicated R37 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R37's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/9/26, indicated R37 was cognitively intact with no delirium and no behaviors. R37 had upper and lower body impairment and required assistance with all activities of daily living. The MDS also indicated R37 had diagnoses of anxiety and depression. R37's diagnoses list included heart disease, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. R37's care plan indicated R37 received an antianxiety medication related to anxiety disorder.R37's hospital discharge orders dated 6/3/26, indicated clonazepam (prescribed to treat anxiety)0.5 mg tablet give 1/2 tablet twice a dayR37's Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated R37 had an order for clonazepam 0.5 mg tablet. Give 1/2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to identify alternatives prior to installing or using grab bars (bars installed at the head of the bed for a resident to hold onto for bed mobility or transfers), ensure grab bars were comprehensively assessed to determine if they were appropriate and safe, discuss the risks and benefits, and obtain informed consent prior to use of grab bars for 2 of 3 residents (R3, R4) who were observed to have grab bars on their bedsR3's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated intact cognition with diagnoses included Type 2 diabetes and chronic heart failure.R3's care plan dated 6/16/25 indicated R3 was independent with bed mobility and utilized bilateral grab bars.R3's Informed Choice Consent for Assistive Devices dated and signed 11/17/23 indicated risks and benefits were discussed and consent obtained from R3 for bilateral grab bars. R3's electronic health record (EHR) lacked evidence a grab bar assessment had been completed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure discontinued medications were returned to the pharmacy or destroyed in a timely manner to decrease the potential for drug diversion for 1 of 1 medication rooms. Findings include: During an observation and interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-A on 4/2/25 at 11:00 a.m., the shelf in the medication room had 108 cards of varying oral medications including blood pressure medications, supplements, antidepressants, etc. There were also two plastic bins with varying creams, bulk powdered medications, bottled liquid medications, boxes of insulin pens, and IV (intravenous) antibiotic medications. These medications included: -One unopened box of 5 glargine insulin pens dated 12/8/24 and an unopened box of 5 aspart insulin pens dated 1/2/24 for R39. -Ten medicine balls of intravenous cefazolin (antibiotic) dated 1/13/25 for R92, two unopened bottles of liquid Haldol (antipsychotic medication used to treat mental health disorders) containing 15 ml (milliliters) and 30 ml's liquid medication dated 3/4/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served warm/hot and palatable to promote quality of life and nutritional intake for 2 of 2 residents (R16 and R29) reviewed for dining. This had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings include: During an observation on 4/02/25 at 7:07 a.m., the cook (C)-A was preparing breakfast, food observed on the heat table included oatmeal, malt-o-meal, ham, and western style eggs. Toast was sitting above the steam table on a metal baking sheet. 4/02/25 at 7:34 a.m., plating begins for the residents seated in the dining room, C-A stated meals are served to dining room first then resident who prefer a tray in their rooms. 4/2/25 at 8:15 a.m., plating begins for East wing, trays put inside transport cart and delivered, last tray delivered to R16 in the East wing 4/2/25 at 8:22 a.m. 4/2/25 at 8:36 a.m., plating begins for North wing, trays put inside transport cart and delivered. 4/2/25 at 8:47 a.m., plating begins for [NAME] wing; extra tray added to transport…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure food stored in the refrigerators and dry storage were labeled, dated and discarded properly. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 40 residents, staff and visitors who received food from facility kitchen. Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour on 3/31/25 at 11:35 a.m., dietary manager (DM) stated the dates listed on the food was the date of opening or when it was prepped and should be tossed after one week. The following items were observed in the fridge or dry storage with expired or undated food: -Hot dogs dated 3/16/25 -Bratwurst dated 3/17/25 -Tuna Salad dated 3/15/25 -Clam chowder dated 2/25/25 -Cranberry preparation date 3/19/25 -Celery preparation date 3/1925 -Corn preparation undated -Ground all spice, manufacturer expiration date 7/19/24 -Ground Cloves, manufacturer expiration date 9/5/24 During interview on 4/2/25 at 9:11 a.m., cook (C)-A and dietary aide (DA)-A stated the date on foods in the fridge are the dates they were open or prepped on. C-A and DA-A both…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$11,911 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $11,911 — penalty dated 2023-09-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN