Oakland Park Communities, Inc.

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 35 beds and averages 33.9 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.09 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.02 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.30 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure staff transporting residents in a facility vehicle were trained on safe transport practices and had appropriate driver's license clearance for 3 of 3 (R1, R2, R3) residents reviewed for accidents. This resulted in an immediate jeopardy for R1 when he fell from his wheelchair to the floor of the van during transport after being improperly secured. Findings include: The immediate jeopardy (IJ) began on 7/2/25, at approximately 4:00 p.m., when nursing assistant (NA)-A was directed to transport R1 to the hospital, loaded him in the front passenger's seat of the van, securing only two out of the four required four-point tie downs, and no seat/lap belt. R1's wheelchair fell backwards onto the floor of the van during transport resulting in a skin tear on top of the left hand. Additionally, NA-A driver's license had not been cleared by the facility's insurance prior to this incident. The IJ was identified on 7/17/25, the administrator was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to implement standards of practice to ensure an assessment was completed to safely use of a lift chair for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents. This resulted in actual harm when R1 had an unwitnessed fall from the lift chair and sustained a trimalleolar fracture (a severe, unstable ankle injury involving fractures of three distinct bones: the lateral malleolus (fibula), medial malleolus (tibia), and posterior malleolus (back of the tibia)) with lateral subluxation of the talus (high-energy trauma (falls) forcing the foot into severe eversion.) R1 was sent to the emergency room (ER) via ambulance and required medical evaluation and treatment. The facility implemented corrective action, so the deficient practice was issued at past non-compliance.Findings include:R1's Hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], identified discharge diagnoses left-side posterior cerebral artery (PCA) stroke territory infarct (affecting the left…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2025-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure manufacturer's instructions were followed for the use of a microwave heating of a gel pack, complete a comprehensive assessment of the burn and implement timely interventions to promote the healing of a burn for 1 of 1 resident (R15) reviewed for burns. This resulted in actual harm to R15 who sustained a 3rd degree burn (destroys your first three layers of skin and fatty tissue) from a gel pack. Findings include: R15's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R15 had a moderate cognitive impairment and diagnoses that included weakness, type 2 diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. R15 required partial to moderate assistance to roll her body left and right and currently had no wounds. R15's care plan dated 10/16/24, identified R15 was at risk for pain related to spinal stenosis, osteoporosis, weakness, impaired mobility, shoulder pain, spondylolisthesis osteoarthritis, chronic gout, low back pain, and amputation of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and document review, the facility failed to contact the resident's physician of medication administration omissions for 1 of 3 resident (R1) reviewed who did not receive medications as ordered. Findings include:R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified she was admitted to the facility from an acute hospital 1/15/26. R1's care plan dated 1/16/26, identified she had a recent diagnosis of CVA. Staff were directed to administer medications as ordered and report abnormal labs and/or vital signs to primary care provider. R1's Hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], identified discharge diagnoses left-side posterior cerebral artery (PCA) stroke territory infarct (affecting the left temporal-occipital lobe as well as thalamus area), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol levels), hypertension (HTN) (high blood pressure), arteriosclerotic disease, hypokalemia (low potassium), urinary tract infection (UTI), and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis. Hospital course: hypokalemia felt to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed for medication errors was free of significant medication errors when orders for Potassium (electrolyte that carries an electrical charge to balance fluids in the cells, contacts muscles including the heart and transmits nerve signals to the brain) was not transcribed into the electronic medical record according to physician's orders and resulted in at least six missed doses of Potassium 10 milliequivalent (mEq).Findings include:R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified she was admitted to the facility from an acute hospital 1/15/26. R1 had slurred or mumbled words, responded adequately to simple, direct communication only, impaired vision, disorganized thinking, and severely impaired cognition. R1's medical included history of cerebral vascular accident (CVA) (stroke) and urinary tract infection (UTI).R1's care plan dated 1/16/26, identified she was at nutritional risk due to aphasia (a sudden…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN CMS10055) and the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC CMS-10123) was provided to 1 of 3 residents (R17) reviewed for beneficiary notification. Findings include: R17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R17 was cognitively intact. R17 was admitted on [DATE], and there was functional range of motion in both upper and lower extremities and was not receiving therapy services. R17's medical record identified R17 started Medicare Part A services on 5/22/25, and last covered day of Medicare Part A services was 7/1/25. R17's medical record that a SNFABN or NOMNC was issued to the resident. The medical record lacked evidence R17 was made aware of the cost of continuing services or on how to appeal the ending of services. During an interview on 12/30/25 at 4:26 p.m., the administrator stated the notices were to be completed by the social services designee or the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide written bed hold notice to resident/resident's representative at the time of transfer to hospital for 1 of 1 resident (R12) reviewed for hospitalizations.Findings include: R12's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R12 had an unplanned discharge with return anticipated. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diastolic heart failure (CHF), atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat) and myocardial infarction (heart attack). R12's progress note dated 12/9/25, identified R12 was admitted to the hospital for fever and shortness of breath with concern of a CHF exacerbation. R12's medical record lacked evidence a written notice for bed hold was provided, that specified the duration of the bed hold, the reserve bed payment policy and the nursing facility's policies regarding bed hold periods. During interview on 12/30/25, at 2:20 p.m. the unit manager (UM)-B stated when the facility received a call from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to revise the resident's care plan to reflect accurate behaviors and interventions to mitigate behaviors for 1 of 1 resident (R18) reviewed for behavioral health.Findings include:R18's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R18 had moderately impaired cognition. R18 required maximum assistance with dressing and grooming, dependent with toileting and transfers and was unable to ambulate. R18 exhibited physical behavioral symptoms toward others such as hit, kick, push or grab one to three times per week and other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others such as rummaging, and/or verbal symptoms one to three days per week. R18 received antipsychotic and antidepressant medications on a routine basis. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, restlessness and agitation, diabetes and depression. R18's nursing progress notes identified the following:11/19/25, Seen by physician on rounds with orders to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the facility antibiotic stewardship program was followed for antibiotic use for 1 of 1 resident (R23) reviewed for antibiotic use. Findings include:R23's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R23 had significant cognitive impairment. R23 required total assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs) and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, anxiety, and urinary tract infection (UTI).R23's progress notes identified R23 was seen in the emergency room on [DATE] for possible seizure activity. R23 was diagnosed with a UTI and Keflex (an antibiotic) was ordered 500 milligrams (MG) two times per day for seven days. R23's medical record identified the following:12/15/25, a urine sample was obtained which identified many bacteria and was set up for culture. 12/16/25, a physician progress note identified R23 was seen on rounds. The physician noted R23 had been started on Keflex to treat a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide the most recent Centers for Disease Control (CDC) education regarding the potential risks and benefits for vaccinations being offered along with offering the most recent pneumococcal vaccine for 1 of 5 residents (R21) reviewed for immunizations.Findings include:R21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], was [AGE] years old, had moderate cognitive impairment, and had a diagnosis of heart failure. R21's immunization record dated 12/31/25, identified R1 had a historical record R1 had received the pneumovax vaccination on 10/23/02. However, R21's medical record failed to identify R21 or R21's representative was provided the most recent Centers for Disease Control (CDC) education regarding the potential risks and benefits of the pneumococcal.During an interview on 12/31/25 at 10:38 a.m., the interim director of nursing (IDON) stated a resident's immunization stated was reviewed upon…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-30 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff hours were submitted accurately on the payroll-based journal. This had the potential to affect all 32 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The PBJ (payroll-based journal) Staffing Report CASPER Report 1705D FY [fiscal year] Quarter 4 2024 (July 1 - September 30) identified the facility had excessively low weekend staffing and failed to have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours/day on the following days: 7/23/24, 7/24/24, 7/25/24, 7/26/24, 7/27/24, 7/28/24, 7/29/24, 7/30/24, 7/31/24, 8/20/24, 8/21/24, 8/22/24, 8/23/24, 8/24/24, 8/25/24, 8/26/24, 8/27/24, 8/28/24, 8/29/24, 8/30/24, 8/31/24, 9/16/24, 9/17/24, 9/18/24, 9/19/24, 9/20/24, 9/21/24, 9/22/24, 9/23/24, 9/24/24, 9/25/24, 9/26/24, 9/27/24, 9/28/24, 9/29/24, and 9/30/24. The facility payroll and working scheduled were reviewed for 7/1/24 through 9/30/24 and there was a licensed nursing staff 24 hours/day consecutively on all 36 days identified on the PBJ report. During an interview on 1/29/25 at 8:49 a.m., registered nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-30 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and document review, the facility failed to develop, monitor, and evaluate their identified performance measures. This had the potential to affect all 46 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The Facility assessment dated 1/2025, identified the facility was a Medicare and Medicaid certified skilled nursing facility. The facility was licensed for 35 beds with an average daily census in the past year of around 34. The facility provided skilled nursing, unskilled nursing, short- and long-term care. Additional services offered are care for those with dementia or other cognitive deficits, end-of-life care, behavioral health, spiritual care, nutritional services, housekeeping, laundry, wound care, ostomy care, dialysis coordination, care of chronic and acute illnesses, oxygen therapy, physical/occupational/speech therapies, restorative and functional maintenance programs, care coordination with physicians, clinics and specialists. Facility Assessment and QAPI Information from the Facility Assessment was used to inform the Quality Assurance Performance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-30 · tag F0868 — widespread
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the quality assurance (QA) committee held meetings with the required members on a, at minimum, quarterly basis. This had potential to affect all 32 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. Findings include: The Quality and Safety Meeting minutes dated 7/18/24, failed to identify the medical director was in attendance or had been provided the information for review and provide opportunity for feedback. The Quality and Safety Meeting dated 10/16/24, identified the director or nursing, consultant pharmacist and medical director were not in attendance or had been provided the information for review provide opportunity for feedback. During an interview on 1/30/25 at 2:13 p.m., with the director of nursing (DON) and registered nurse (RN)-D, RN-D stated the administrator was unavailable for interview. RN-D stated the information in the meeting minutes identified the required members did not attend; however, believed they were available by phone at any time needed. The facility policy Quality…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$44,030 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $26,685 — penalty dated 2025-12-30
• $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-07-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $182K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN